Council

Tuesday 19 February 2019 at 10.30 am

 

 

AGENDA

 


Council Meeting

19 February 2019

Northland Regional Council Agenda

 

Meeting to be held in the Council Chamber

36 Water Street, Whangārei

on Tuesday 19 February 2019, commencing at 10.30 am

 

Recommendations contained in the council agenda are NOT council decisions. Please refer to council minutes for resolutions.

 

Item                                                                                                                                      Page

Housekeeping

1.0    apologies (whakapahĀ) 

2.0    declarations of conflicts of interes

3.0    Health and Safety Report for December 2018 and January 2019                                        5

4.0    Council Minutes/Action Sheet/Council Working Party and Working Group Updates

4.1      Confirmation of Minutes - 11 December 2018                                                                                 7

4.2      Receipt of Action Sheet                                                                                                                          15

4.3      Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings                                                                   18

4.4      Council Working Group Updates                                                                                                         20

5.0    Financial Reports

5.1      Financial Report to 31 January 2019                                                                                                  22

5.2      Credit note for approval                                                                                                                         26

5.3      Approval to Borrow to Fund Flood Protection Infrastructure                                                  28

5.4      Regional Rates Collection - Update to 31 December 2018                                                        31

5.5      Externally Managed Funds: Transfer of Private Equity Funds from PRF to CIF                   36

5.6      Emergency Services Fund Update - Funding Uptake, Engagement and Promotion Plan and Reserve                                                                                                                                                                         39

6.0    Decision Making Matters

6.1      Treasury Management Policy                                                                                                               44

6.2      Adoption of Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 and approval to consult                      62

6.3      Adoption of the Annual Plan 2019/20 Supporting Information                                             135

6.4      Adoption of the Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document and Approval to Consult 202

6.5      Manea Footprints of Kupe - Request for a funding contribution from Council                211

6.6      Environment Fund Criteria Review                                                                                                   271

6.7      Inter-regional Marine Pest Management - Discussion Document                                        275

7.0    Operational Reports

7.1      Chair's Report to Council                                                                                                                     292

7.2      Chief Executive’s Report to Council                                                                                                 295

8.0    Receipt of Committee Minutes                                                                                                              324

9.0    Business with the Public Excluded                                                                            340

9.1      Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - 11 December 2018

9.2      Receipt of Confidential Committee Minutes

9.3      Human Resources Report

9.4      Sale of Council's Lessor's Interest in a CBD Property

9.5      Remission Policy t (WHAKAPUAKANGA O MUA)

 


 

ACC - Accident Compensation Corporation

AHB -  Animal Health Board

ALGIM -  Association of Local Government Information Management

AMA -  Aquaculture Management Area

AMP – Asset Management Plan/Activity Management Plan

BOI -  Bay of Islands

BOPRC - Bay of Plenty Regional Council

CAPEX - Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets)

CBEC -  Community, Business and Environment Centre

CDEM -  Civil Defence Emergency Management

CEG -  Co-ordinating Executive Group – Northland Civil Defence management team

CEO -  Chief Executive Officer

CIMS -  Co-ordinated Incident Management System (emergency management structure)

CMA -  Coastal Marine Area

CPCA -  Community Pest Control Areas

CRI -  Crown Research Institute

DHB - District Health Board 

DOC -  Department of Conservation

DOL -  Department of Labour

DPMC -  Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet

ECA -  Environmental Curriculum Award

ECAN -  Environment Canterbury

EE -  Environmental Education

EECA -  Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority

EEZ -  Exclusive Economic Zone

EF -  Environment Fund

EMA -  Employers and Manufacturers Association

EMC - Environmental Management Committee

EOC -  Emergency Operations Centre

EPA - Environmental Protection Authority

FDE -  Farm Dairy Effluent

FNDC -  Far North District Council

FNHL -  Far North Holdings Limited

FPP -  First Past the Post – voting system for NRC elections

GE -  Genetic Engineering

GIS - Geographic Information System

GMO - Genetically Modified Organism

HSNO - Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act

HBRC -  Hawke's Bay Regional Council

HEMP -  Hapū Environmental Management Plan

Horizons - Brand name of Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council 

HR - Human Resources

HSWA - Health and Safety at Work Act 2015

IEMP - Iwi Environmental Management Plan

IPPC -  Invited Private Plan Change: a process to allow Aquaculture Management Areas to be established

IRIS -  Integrated Regional Information System

KDC -  Kaipara District Council 

KPI -  Key Performance Indicator

LATE - Local Authority Trading Enterprise

LGA -  Local Government Act 2002

LGNZ -  Local Government New Zealand

LGOIMA -  Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

LGOL -  Local Government Online

LTP -  Long Term Plan

LTFS -  Long Term Financial Strategy

MCDEM -  Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Mgmnt

MFE -  Ministry for the Environment 

MHWS - Mean High Water Springs

MMH -  Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited

MNZ -  Maritime New Zealand

MOH -  Ministry of Health

MOT -  Ministry of Transport

MPI – Ministry for Primary Industries

MSD -  Ministry of Social Development

NCMC -  National Crisis Management Centre

NES – National Environmental Standards

NDHB -  Northland District Health Board

NZRC -  New Zealand Refining Company (Marsden Point)

NGO -  Non-Governmental Organisation

NIF -  Northland Intersectoral Forum

NIWA - National Institute of Water and Atmosphere

NORTEG - Northland Technical Advisory Group

NZCPS - New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement

NZTA - New Zealand Transport Agency

NZQA - New Zealand Qualifications Authority

NZWWA - New Zealand Water and Wastes Association

OFI - Opportunity for Improvement

ORC -  Otago Regional Council

OSH -  Occupational Safety & Health (now Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment)

PCBU – Person Conducting Business or Undertaking

PDF - Portable Document Format

PPE -  Personal Protective Equipment

RAP -  Response Action Plan

RAQP -  Regional Air Quality Plan

RCP -  Regional Coastal Plan

RFI - Request for Information

RFP - Request for Proposal

RTC - Regional Transport Committee

RLTS - Regional Land Transport Strategy

RMA - Resource Management Act 1991

RMG - Resource Managers Group (Regional Councils)

RMZ - Riparian Management Zone

ROI - Return on Investment

RPMS - Regional Pest Management Strategy

RPS - Regional Policy Statement

RSG - Regional Sector Group

RTO - Regional Tourism Organisation

RWASP - Regional Water and Soil Plan

SIPO – Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives

SITREP - Situation Report

SMF - Sustainable Management Fund

SOE -  State of Environment (or) State Owned Enterprise 

SOLGM -Society of Local Government Managers

SPARC -  Sport & Recreation New Zealand

SRC - Southland Regional Council (Environment Southland)

STV -  Single Transferable Vote

SWAG - Surface Water Allocation Group

SWPA -  Sustainable Water Programme of Action

TA - Territorial Authority: City & District Councils

TAG -Technical Advisory Group

Tier 1 - Site level plan or response for an oil spill

Tier 2 - Regional level plan or response to an oil spill

Tier 3 - National level plan or response to an oil spill

TLA - Territorial Local Authority – City & District Councils

TMP - Treasury Management Plan

TOR - Terms of Reference

TPK - Te Puni Kōkiri (Ministry of Maori Development)

TRAION - Te Rūnanga a Iwi o Ngāpuhi

TRC - Taranaki Regional Council

TROTR -Te Rūnanga o Te Rarawa

TUANZ - Telecommunications Users Association of NZ

WCRC - West Coast Regional Council

WDC -  Whangarei District Council

WHHIF -  Whangarei Harbour Health Improvement Fund

WRC - Waikato Reginal Council

WSMP – Workplace Safety Management Practices

WWTP -  Wastewater Treatment Plant

 

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 3.0

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Health and Safety Report for December 2018 and January 2019

ID:

A1159977

From:

Tracey Warboys, Health and Safety Specialist

 

Executive Summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report provides an update from the Health and Safety Specialist for the months of December 2018 and January 2019.  Four medium events for the period, with three investigations raised.   Lack of generic traffic management plans to be raised as a medium risk on the risk register as currently in non-compliance with the Code of Practice for Temporary Traffic Management Plans.  Informative workshops held and affected departments to determine sites to be included in the TMP. 

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Health and Safety Report for December 2018 and January 2019’ by Tracey Warboys, Health and Safety Specialist and dated 4 February 2019, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Total of 24 reports for the period: December 2018 – 10, January 2019 – 14.  Medium events are:

Security:                        Flyger Road nursery break in (tools stolen).  Police notified.

Serious Near Miss:     Excavator slipped down the river bank during Kaihu River Maintenance.  Nil injury or damage to plant.

Incidents:                      Small fire while using gas bottle during Rose Street transport promotion.  Nil injury.

                                          Employee distracted while driving and ran off the road.  Minor injury to staff member, front end damage to vehicle.

Legislation              

Health and Safety at Work Strategy for 2018–2028 launched by WorkSafe.  WorkSafe advise that the Government, sectors, businesses and communities must take steps to align their health and safety related work with the strategy.  Further material, reports and updates will be published on their website.

 

Policy and documentation review

Processes continue to be mapped.  Population of staff’s health and safety training records commenced (in Promapp). 

 

Health monitoring

Fifty staff participated in the annual skin checks, with three referrals for further investigation.

 

Audit and inspections

·    Final renovation inspection undertaken with ARCO.  Overall the contract managed well with minor housekeeping issues resolved as they arose.

·    Internal quality audit undertaken – waiting on report.

·    Mt Tiger pre-harvest inspection undertaken – minor recommendations made.

·    Mt Tiger aerial spraying stopped due to Northland Forestry Management not completing the annual contractor assessment.   Assessment undertaken and spraying observation undertaken with minor recommendations.

 

Other

·    Year in Review presented to ELT (Dec).  Presentation to the Risk and Working Party scheduled (Feb).

·    HR and H&S Strategic Management Review undertaken.

·    4x4 and defensive driver training completed (16 staff).

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

05 February 2019

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 4.1

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Confirmation of Minutes - 11 December 2018

ID:

A1158038

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager

 

Recommendation

That the minutes of the council meeting held on 11 December 2018 be confirmed as a true and correct record.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Council minutes - 11 December 2018  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Chris Taylor

Title:

Governance Support Manager

Date:

12 February 2019

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 4.1

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 4.2

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Receipt of Action Sheet

ID:

A1157209

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakārapopototanga

The purpose of this report is to enable the meeting to receive the current action sheet.

 

Recommendation

That the action sheet be received.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Council Action Sheet - January 2019  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Chris Taylor

Title:

Governance Support Manager

Date:

12 February 2019

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 4.2

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 4.3

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings

ID:

A1154691

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings’ be received.

 

Planning Working Party (Chair, Councillor Joce Yeoman)

The Planning Working Party met on 5 December 2018. The topics for discussion included:

·        Far North District Plan Feedback

·        General Business

Following discussion, the Planning Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:

·        A number of amendments to the feedback were suggested.  Once the suggested amendments are made by staff it was requested it be sent through to the working party chair for review before sending to the Far North District Council.

·        Staff to report back  with an update on the Planning Department’s work programme.

 

Pest Management Working Party (Chair, Councillor Mike Finlayson)

The Pest Management Working Party met on 12 December 2018.  The topics for discussion included:

·        Deer control programme

·        Pest Fish Plan

·        Biosecurity 2025 “Ko ta tou – This is Us” launch

·        Ōpua fanworm response update

·        Communications and Engagement Strategy for Biosecurity

Following discussion, the Pest Management Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:

·        Staff to include a repeat of the farm survey for pest fish and plants in the Pest Fish Plan.

·        School biosecurity educational kits (House of Science) were to be investigated for Enviroschools.

·        Several recommendations for council and public biosecurity communications were made.

Natural Resources Working Party (Chair, Councillor Justin Blaikie)

The Natural Resources Working Party met on 4 December 2018. The topics for discussion included:

·        Stewardship of our ancient iconic trees

·        Final draft of Environment Fund criteria review

·        Hill Country Erosion Fund contract bid

·        Water Strategy/Flood Strategy and Communications/Engagement Plans


 

Following discussion, the Natural Resources Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:

·        Staff to check the science around the benefits of fencing vs riparian planting and provide an update to council.

·        Staff to check the district council rules/initiatives around wetlands for the Whangārei district.

·        Report back to Natural Resources Working Party to advise results of hill country erosion funding round.

 

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

12 February 2019

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 4.4

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Council Working Group Updates

ID:

A1159587

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Council Working Group Updates’ be received.

 

Awanui River Working Group (Chair - Councillor Mike Finlayson)

The Awanui River Working Group met on 9 November 2018.  The topics for discussion included:

·    Budget 2018 – 2019 and Proposed Work programme.

·    Bells Hill slip and Te Ahu works update.

·    Preliminary scheme design.

·    Flood modelling update.

 

Following discussion, the Awanui River Working Group provided advice on the following next steps:

·        Provide the depreciation process on scheme assets.

·        Consideration to placing bollards/gates at Allen Bell Drive.

·        Liaise with FNDC on a possible recreation area for Kaitāia, once works is complete at the Firth site.

·        Update district councils when new flood mapping is released.

 

 

Whangārei Harbour Catchment Group (Chair – Lorna Douglas)

The Whangārei Harbour Catchment Group met on 3 December 2018.  The topics for discussion included:

·        Update on Whitebait Connection work in the catchment.

·        Presentation from NRC staff updating the Hātea water quality project.

·        Update from WDC staff on progress with stormwater management in the catchment.

·        Discussion regarding allocation of funding to projects that support objectives in Catchment Plan.

Following discussion, the Whangārei Harbour Catchment Group agreed on the following next steps:

·        The group agreed to a request from WDC councillors to write a lettter formally supporting prioritisation for stormwater pollution mitigation in the catchment.

·        The group will decide on allocation of budget to specific projects as more detail comes available for the Takahiwai and Mair Park inanga restoration projects, potentially via group email;

o   Any funds remaining after support for the inanga projects could be allocated for further fish passage barrier removal.


 

 

Mangere Catchment Group (Chair – John Ballinger)

The Mangere Catchment Group met on 26 November 2018.  The topics for discussion included:

·        Where’s your Wai?

·        Implementation of non-regulatory actions.

·        Frequency of meetings.

Following discussion, the Mangere Catchment Group provided advice on the following next steps:

·        Whole group to network and send suggested planting site ideas to NRC in the next week.  Looking for high profile sites that are already fenced on Kara Road and / or life style blocks and / or sheep and beef farmers.

·        Investigate design of a sign combining all collaborators e.g. Mangere Catchment Group, NRC, Enviroschools.

·        Contact Finnisha to see whether elver transfers are still taking place, and if so, how the catchment group might help.

 

 

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Bruce Howse

Title:

Group Manager - Environmental Services

Date:

07 February 2019

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 5.1

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Financial Report to 31 January 2019

ID:

A1161254

From:

Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant

 

Executive summary

This report is to inform council of the year to date (YTD) financial result to January 2019.  Council has achieved a YTD surplus after transfers to and from reserves of $1.21M, which is $1.89M unfavourable to budget.  Excluding the negative impact of externally managed funds ($2.24M) council has achieved a $350K favourable YTD variance to budget.

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Financial Report to 31 January 2019’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 7 February 2019, be received.

 

Report


Revenue

Year to date revenue is $24.06M, which is $2.82M or 10.5% below budget.

 

Expenditure

Year to date expenditure is $22.23M, which is $293K or 1.3% below budget. 

Note that across council there is a $266K favourable salaries variance predominantly due to a deferral in the recruitment of positions identified in the LTP.

Transfers to reserves

Year to date transfers to reserves are $638K lower than budget. This is due to having no externally managed fund gains to be transferred to reserve of $765K offset by lower reserve funding being required for Investment and Growth Reserve (IGR) projects that are running behind budget and higher than budgeted transfers to the bus reserves. Of the net $2.1M impact of the externally managed funds up to $1.6M can be funded from previously reinvested externally managed fund gains with the balance to be funded from operational savings.

Capital Expenditure

Capital expenditure of $1.98M (excluding commercial property purchases and the Kensington commercial development) is lower than budgeted $2.73M.  This is predominantly due to the timing of flood infrastructure work compared to budget.

 

 

Attachments

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

12 February 2019

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 5.2

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Credit note for approval

ID:

A1136567

From:

Trish Wells, Accounts Receivable Officer

 

Executive summary

After an internal review, our processing of the resource consents we granted for APP.39163.01.01, which was the subject of Judicial Review proceedings lodged by Forest and Bird and later the Department of Conservation, it was discovered that the wrong template for the notification decision was used.  In light of this mistake, a credit note has been requested by council’s Group Manager – Regulatory Services for the costs of processing the consent application.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Credit note for approval’ by Trish Wells, Accounts Receivable Officer and dated 10 December 2018, be received.

2.         That the issue of credit note 7403973 to the value of $8,441.32 including GST (as detailed in the report from the Accounts Receivable Officer, Trish Wells, dated 10 December 2018) be approved.

 

Background

The credit note has been authorised by the appropriate manager.  The following credit note amount is higher than that delegation and is therefore listed for the council’s ratification:

 

Credit Note No.

Credit Amount inc. GST

Original Amount inc. GST

Customer/Reason

7403973

$8,441.32

$8,441.32

APP.039163.01.01

 

Following the granting of this consent, the council received notice from the High Court of a Judicial Review of its notification and substantive decisions lodged by the Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc (Forest and Bird).

 

The council engaged a law firm to represent it in these proceedings, who then undertook a risk assessment of the council’s decisions process.  As a result of this assessment, it was found that council had used the wrong notification decision template.  Based on this information, council made the decision not to defend the Judicial Review.  The credit note for the outstanding consent application fees is an acknowledgement of the notification decision error council has made.

 

 

 

Considerations

1.      Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

To approve the credit note

To prevent the council from defending the Judicial Review as per legal instruction.

NA

2

To not approve the credit note

NA

Council would have to reinstate the charges and defend the Judicial Review incurring further costs both legal and in staff time.

The staff’s recommended option is to approve the credit note

2.      Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance because it is part of council’s day-to-day activities and is in accordance with the approved Delegations Manual – Financial Delegations from the Council to Officers.

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The decision is consistent with the Delegations Manual – Financial Delegations from the council to officers.

 

Being a purely administrative matter, Community views, Māori impact statement, Financial implications and Implementation issues are not applicable.

 

Attachments

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

12 February 2019

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 5.3

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Approval to Borrow to Fund Flood Protection Infrastructure

ID:

A1156622

From:

Simon Crabb, Finance Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

Council signalled in the 2018–28 Long Term Plan that future flood protection infrastructure would be funded by external borrowing, and programmed to be repaid from the equity component of related targeted rates and regional wide flood infrastructure rates.

For the seven months to 31 January 2019, capital expenditure on Awanui flood protection infrastructure has totalled $1M, and council approval is sought to borrow this amount from the Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA) at a rate in the vicinity of 4.13% pa over 14 years.

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Approval to Borrow to Fund Flood Protection Infrastructure’ by Simon Crabb, Finance Manager and dated 25 January 2019, be received.

2.         That council enters into a loan from the Local Government Funding Agency of $1,016,260 (inclusive of 1.6% Borrower Notes) at a fixed borrowing cost in the range of 4% pa and 4.25% pa for a term of 14 years, to fund Awanui flood protection infrastructure capital works, and be repaid from the Awanui River Targeted Rates and the Regional Wide Flood Infrastructure Rates.

 

Background/Tuhinga

It is proposed that council take a loan of $1M from the LGFA at a fixed rate in the vicinity of 4.13% pa over the longest term available of 14 years (repayable on 14 April 2033) to fund the capital works incurred on Awanui River flood protection infrastructure for the 7 months to 31 January 2019. Repayment of this loan (partially after 14 years with the balance fully repaid after 30 years) will be funded from the equity component of the Awanui River Targeted Rate and Regional Wide Flood Infrastructure Rate collected over the next 30 years.  As the equity component of these rates are collected it will be periodically deposited and financially separated in the Infrastructure Investment Fund.

Currently council has external borrowing totalling $18.5M of which $14.7M relates to infrastructure assets and $3.8M relates to the loan that council issued to Northland Emergency Services Trust (NEST).  Council currently does not carry any internal borrowing associated with its infrastructure projects. 

Of the total $18.5M borrowings, $8.5M is currently issued from the Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA).  Council’s borrowing limit is $62M of which $20M is permitted to come from the LGFA in council’s current capacity as a non-guaranteeing member.  At the time of writing, the LGFA fixed interest rate for a 14 year loan is 4.13% per annum.  Trading banks are not lending beyond 5 years and even the commercial institutions are having problems lending long term to unrated councils because of their own investment policies requiring a credit rating.

All councils that borrow from the LGFA must subscribe to borrower notes (convertible debt securities) in an amount equal to 1.6% of their borrowings.  In this case, council will be subject to $16,260 of borrower notes that will be retained by the LGFA, earn interest and be repaid to council when the related loan is repaid.

The benefits associated with securing a borrowing cost in the vicinity of 4.13% pa as opposed to withdrawing funds from the Infrastructure Investment Fund at a cost of capital of 5.75% pa (based on the IIF targeted rate of return) will be passed directly onto the Northland community.

It should be noted that the above rates are based on the New Zealand yield curve and official cash rate at the time of writing, and are indicative and subject to change between now and the date any drawdown is undertaken.

To align the timing of the interest payments with council’s other borrowings the first interest payment date will be on 13 August 2019 and then semi-annually thereafter.

Considerations

1.      Options

2.                                  

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Enter into a loan with the LGFA at a fixed interest cost in the vicinity of 4.13% per annum over a 14-year term to fund $1M of capital works to date related to the Awanui flood protection scheme.

Provide certainty and savings to the Northland community.

 

 

There is no opportunity to take advantage of any future favourable interest rate movements as the LGFA loan is locked into a fixed interest rate.

2

Utilise funds from the Infrastructure Investment Fund (IIF) to fund the capital works related to the Awanui flood protection scheme, and charge a cost of capital of 5.75%.

No additional borrowing

is entered into and capacity is maintained for any future borrowing.

An increased cost is placed on Northland community due to the increased cost of capital associated with IIF funding.

 

The staff’s recommended option is 1.

2.      Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan and is in accordance with the approved Treasury Management Policy.

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with council’s Treasury Management Policy and the 2018–28 Long Term Plan.

Further considerations

4.      Community views

The impact of external borrowing from the Local Government funding agency has been consulted on with the community through the appropriate consultative procedures in accordance with s82 of the Local Government Act 2002.


 

5.      Māori impact statement

Targeted consultation on the council’s intention to borrow externally from the Local Government Funding Agency was undertaken with iwi as part of the 2018–28 Long Term Plan consultation process using existing relationship channels.

6.      Financial implications

Interest rates are based on the current New Zealand interest rate yield curve at the time of writing, and are indicative and subject to change between now and the date any drawdown is undertaken.

7.      Implementation issues

There are no implementation issues that council needs to be aware of.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

07 February 2019

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 5.4

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Regional Rates Collection - Update to 31 December 2018

ID:

A1156884

From:

Simon Crabb, Finance Manager

 

Executive Summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The three district councils administer the collection of the regional council rates on our behalf.  The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the collection of this year’s current rates and the rate arrears owing to the regional council by each district council.

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Regional Rates Collection - Update to 31 December 2018’ by Simon Crabb, Finance Manager and dated 25 January 2019, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Table one over the page presents a full reconciliation of councils’ 2018/19 current rates and rate arrears that have been collected by each district council in the six months to 31 December 2018, and the outstanding amounts that remain to be collected.

Far North District Council

The Far North District Council has collected 47% of our current year rates (2017 48.8%). 

$221,517 (2017 $204,034) of rate arrears has also been collected in the past six months resulting in a closing total rate arrears balance (excluding current year rates) still to be collected of $2,720,599 (Dec 2017 $3,071,935).  Māori freehold land accounts for $2,084,427 of the total rate arears balance.

Attachment 1 is the revenue and collections report provided by Far North District Council outlining the actions they have in place to collect outstanding rate arrears.  A representative from FNDC will attend the council meeting.

 

Kaipara District Council

The Kaipara District Council has collected 49% of our current year rates.

$143,645 of rate arrears has also been collected in the past six months resulting in a closing total rate arrears balance of $464,256.

 

Whangarei District Council

The Whangarei District Council (WDC) has collected 60% of our current year rates (2017 59%).    $132,572 (2017 $113,129) of rate arrears has also been collected during the past six months resulting in a closing rate arrears balance of $196,214 (Dec 2017 $232,137).

 

When rates are received from the District Councils they are deposited into council’s Short Term Investment Fund.  When council receives a lower level of rating revenue, it can result in a reduced level of returns derived from the Short Term Fund.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Far North District Council - Revenue and Collections Quarterly Report to 31 December 2018  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

13 February 2019

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                       ITEM: 5.4

19 February 2019                                                                                                                                                           Attachment 1

MEETING:          FINANCE COMMITTEE – NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL

 

Name of item:            REVENUE AND COLLECTIONS QUARTERLY REPORT

                                    31 December 2018

 

Author:                          Margriet Veenstra, Manager - Transaction Services

 

Date of report:               25/01/2019

 

Document number:       A2343696

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of the report is to provide quarterly reporting to Northland Regional Council on action taken to collect current rates and rate arrears, and to provide information on how collection is tracking against targets.

 

 

1)         Background:

 

This document has been prepared to highlight the actions taken by Far North District Council for the collection of the Northland Regional Council’s rates and to reduce the monies outstanding.  This report is prepared as at the end of the second quarter of the financial year 2018/19.

 

 

 

2)         Discussion and options

 

·    An Urgent Demand process in cooperation with the in-house Legal team commenced in September 2018.

Focus on 180 highest arrears General Title properties without a mortgage. Three letters were created to support the process: Urgent Demand, Final Urgent Demand and Legal proceedings to commence.

Audit of all accounts has been completed

§ 75% of customers have received both urgent demand letters, of which 85% are due to move to legal proceedings.

§ 3% of customers paid their arrears in full

§ 11% are now on a payment plan.

§ 12% are either deceased rate payers or abandoned land

§ 10% of customers require further investigation

Next steps: Meeting with external Legal provider is to take place early February to identify a select number of properties to commence court proceedings.

·    A review commenced in November of all accounts referred to the external collection agency with the view of taking back all accounts to Councils Debt Management Team.

So far 47% of accounts have been taken back to Council

Of those taken back, 47% have received first and/or second letters as part of the Urgent Demand process.

37% have either returned mail and/or need further investigation.

6% accounts are now paid and/or have a payment plan in place.

10% are abandoned land or deceased rate payer

·    Audit is taking place of all fixed direct debits currently in place with Council. So far, 80% of customers have now been switched to variable direct debit or have a new fixed direct debit within minimum Rates Easy Pay requirement.

·    Continuous audit of existing Arrangements to Pay to ensure the agreements are being met. Contacting the customer where this is not the case and either reschedule the agreement or cancel and move to next recovery step.

·    A review of all procedures is being undertaken to ensure adequate monitoring and actions are proceeding in a timely manner

·    The ongoing promotion of the Internal Affairs Rates Rebates Scheme in day to day communications with Ratepayers and regular meetings with relevant community organisations is another key focus.

 

 

Collection Data

 

An analysis of arrear, by collection status, is included in the following table. Arrears are the debt outstanding at the beginning of the 2018/19 financial year, together with arrears on rates for the 2nd quarter to 31 December 2018. Note: the data used for the below analysis was extracted on 23/01/19 which resulted in a difference of $12,721 for the total debt to be collected.

 

 

 

Council’s remission policies

 

Council’s remission policies are designed to recognise the unique nature of the Far North with its significant areas of unoccupied Maori freehold land. Overall the policies address issues of financial hardship and the protection of areas of land with particular conservation or community values. The following table shows the instance of remissions for each policy and the financial impact of these remissions.

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 5.5

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Externally Managed Funds: Transfer of Private Equity Funds from PRF to CIF

ID:

A1156890

From:

Simon Crabb, Finance Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

In light of the potential cashflow required for the Kensington and Kaipara Service Centre development projects it is proposed to swap the illiquid private equity funds currently held in the Property Reinvestment Fund (PRF) with cash redeemed from the Community Investment Fund. Once transferred, all of council’s investment in private equity will be held in the CIF, which is council’s longest term fund.

 

Any amendment to council’s Statements of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPOs) to reflect the proposed private equity transfer (and the associated capacity to absorb the committed yet uncalled capital component of $2.3M) will be incorporated as part of a wider review following the presentation from council’s Independent Investment Advisor (Jonathan Eriksen of EriksensGlobal) at the council workshop on 5 February 2019.

 

The SIPO review will also incorporate the necessary changes to reflect an ongoing strategy of transferring PRF growth assets to PRF income assets as a means of providing funding certainty for council’s two major development projects.  Once construction contracts are in place, EriksensGlobal will be provided with a projected cashflow, and subsequently recommend any future fund transfers.

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Externally Managed Funds: Transfer of Private Equity Funds from PRF to CIF’ by Simon Crabb, Finance Manager and dated 25 January 2019, be received.

2.         That the private equity funds held in the Property Reinvestment Fund are transferred to the Community Investment Fund and reimbursed with cash redeemed from Community Investment Fund Income assets, in line with the recommendations provided by EriksensGlobal.

3.         That growth assets held in the Property Reinvestment Fund are transferred to Income assets as necessary to provide funding certainty for the costs of the Kensington and Kaipara Service Centre development projects, in line with the recommendations provided by EriksensGlobal.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Tables 1 and 2 over the page present recommendations from EriksensGlobal to:

 

·     transfer the private equity funds currently held in the PRF into the CIF as the CIF has the longest investment time horizon of all council’s managed funds and therefore is best positioned to tolerate a higher level of volatility (and greater returns) associated with private equity assets;

 

·     replace the private equity funds transferred out of the PRF with cash redeemed from the CIF - Milford and Mint Income funds with a view to creating liquidity and funding certainty in the PRF to draw upon as the costs of the Kensington and Kaipara Service Centre development fall due. This cash will be used as the first funding source to pay for the initial development project costs.

 

Table 1 - CIF

 

Table 2 – PRF

A strategy of continuing to increase the weighting of PRF Income assets is proposed to be incorporated into the SIPO review process currently underway.  Income assets typically are less volatile, have a lower risk of capital loss, and are easier and quicker to convert into cash.  As such, they enhance the certainty of cashflow required to fund the costs of council’s upcoming development projects.

 

Considerations

1.                                   Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Transfer the private equity funds currently held in the Property Reinvestment Fund into the Community Investment Fund and reimburse with the equivalent amount from CIF Income funds.

Hold funds in the PRF that are easily and quickly converted to cash, are less volatile and have a lower risk of capital loss and thus provide funding certainty for the Kensington and Kaipara development projects.

The CIF increases its exposure to private equity which is illiquid.

2

Status Quo

No additional risk is taken in the CIF, and the CIF maintains its current level of liquidity.

The target return of the CIF (council’s longest fund time horizon) is not increased and the PRF will continue to hold an element of illiquid investment that will not be available as funding for development projects.

 

The staff’s recommended option is 1.

2.      Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance because it is part of council’s day-to-day activities and is in accordance with the approved Treasury Management Policy.

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with council’s Treasury Management Policy, the 2018–28 Long Term Plan both of which were approved in accordance with council’s decision-making requirements of sections 76–82 of the Local Government Act 2002.

Being a purely administrative matter, Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications and Implementation Issues are not applicable.

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

13 February 2019

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 5.6

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Emergency Services Fund Update - Funding Uptake, Engagement and Promotion Plan and Reserve 

ID:

A1160121

From:

Tony Phipps, Group Manager - Customer Services - Community Resilience and Natasha Stubbing, Marketing and Engagement Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the uptake of the Emergency Services Fund (ESF), progress with engagement and promotion and to recommend the use and distribution of the accumulated funds from the ESF reserve.

Engagement and Promotion

Over the past six months our Marketing and Engagement team have been meeting with each of the Emergency Services Funding recipients to formulate a publicity and promotions plan that is mutually beneficial.  A summary of the activities to date and proposed future activities is outlined and it is recommended that council approve up to $10,000 a year of any reserve funds be spent each year on ESF engagment and promotion.

 

Distribution of Reserve

A reserve balance has accumulated in the Emergency Services Fund due to higher actual rate collection and lower collection costs than budgeted.  A recommendation is made to distribute any accumulated reserve funds to the current fund recipients in proportion to current allocations.

 

Recommendation

1.         That the report ‘Emergency Services Fund Update - Funding Uptake, Engagement and Promotion Plan and Reserve  ’ by Tony Phipps, Group Manager - Customer Services - Community Resilience and Natasha Stubbing, Marketing and Engagement Manager and dated 5 February 2019, be received.

 

2.         That council approves the use and distribution of the Emergency Services Fund Reserve as follows:  up to $10,000 a year can be spent on ESF engagement and promotion, and the remainder distributed to ESF recipients in direct proportion to current allocation.

 

 

Background/Tuhinga

Funding Uptake

Table 1 below shows the Emergency Services Fund recipients, annual allocations and funding uptake for (financial year) FY 18/19 to 31 January 2019.

Emergency Service Provider

Funding Purpose

Annual Allocation (in each of three years, GST exclusive)

Funding Uptake as at 31 Jan 2019

Northland Emergency Services Trust

Operational costs for the air rescue and ambulance services

$525,000

$262,500

Emergency Service Provider

Funding Purpose

Annual Allocation (in each of three years, GST exclusive)

Funding Uptake as at 31 Jan 2019

Surf Life Saving Northern Region

Professional guards at popular beaches outside volunteer paid hours

$201,000

$201,000

St John
Northern Region

Partially-fund replacement of Northland ambulances

$90,000

$90,000

Coastguard
Northern Region

Operating, support and training costs for Northland units

$84,000

$42,000

 

Engagement and promotion

In the past council has not actively promoted our support of the emergency services funding recipients.  Given ratepayers’ increased desire to be informed about where their rates are spent and how they receive value for money for their rates, it is imperative council communicate our funding of these vital services.

Ratepayers contribute about $12 each a year, creating a funding pool to support organisations whose primary purpose is to save lives that are in immediate or critical danger.

We met with each of the funding recipients and developed a promotional campaign plan; however, this has been challenging with getting information and outputs from the organisations.  Another issue has been dealing with the organisations’ internal protocols and procedures which has meant a number of our proposed activities not yet coming to fruition.

 

The engagement and promotions include some external costs for advertising and promotional materials, signage and banners, etc. estimated at up to $10,000 per year.  As we have no current budget to cover those costs it is recommended that they be funded from the ESF reserve.

 

Table 2  below shows a summary of our activities to date and our proposed future activities. 

Organisation

Activity/action

Status

Additional expenditure costs

ALL

·    Promotion at the annual emergency services open day

·    Article included in new council newsletter To Tatou in both the electronic and print version

·    Updated content on council website

·    Social media advertising on Facebook and Instagram

·    Pull up banners promoting all emergency services funding recipients

Complete

                Complete

                

 

Complete 

Complete

 

In progress

n/a

 

n/a          

 

 

n/a

n/a      

 

$1600

NEST

·    Radio advertising during NEST annual appeal and 30-year celebration

·    Print advert in Northern Advocate

·    Advertorial in Northern Advocate NEST 30-year celebration edition

·    Pullup banner at NEST office (temporarily on loan need to supply permanent solution)

·    Signage on hanger

·    Branding on new helicopters

Complete

                 Complete

Complete

 

 

 

Complete

 

 

On hold

On hold

$4000

 

$400

n/a

 

 

 

n/a

 

 

$2000

TBC

Surf Lifesaving Northern Region

·    3.9m blade flying flags at each Northland beach with paid lifeguards

·    Print advert in January edition of Savvy magazine

·    Information included in national media release

·    Branding on uniform

·    Permanent signage at lifeguard facilities

Complete

                 Complete

 

Complete

            

Unavailable    Need to progress

$2600

 

$270

 

n/a

 

 

Approx. $1500

CoastGuard Northern Region

·    Promoted Old4New lifejacket campaign on social media

·    Promotion of Coastguard messages during safe boating campaign

·    Permanent signage at Coastguard facilities

·    Promotion around volunteer week

Complete

 

Ongoing

 

Need to progress

                         

May

n/a

 

n/a

 

Approx. $1500

n/a

St Johns Ambulance Northern Region

·    Unveiling and ceremony of new ambulance

·    Branding on new ambulance

·    Signage at buildings (note this will be minimal and internal only)

TBC

                          TBC                      On hold

n/a

 

n/a 

Approx. $500

The promotion and activities still to be completed will cost approx.

Note: This includes money to find a better solution to display flying flags on beaches for next summer’s patrol as current solution not viable.

$7500-8000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 5.6

19 February 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Reserve use and distribution

In January 2018 $22,500 was paid from the reserve to Surf Lifesaving Northern Region to cover the cost of a Lifeguard Service at Baylys Beach from 23 December 2017 to 14 January 2018.

The options for distribution of the reserve funds was discussed by a council workshop on 22 November 2017 (refer to A1006389) and council expressed support for paying out the accumulated reserve to current fund recipients in proportion to the fund allocation to those recipients.  However, due to an oversight this was not formally put to council and resolved. 

To rectify this, a recommendation is made with this paper.

·    As at 30 June 2017 the Emergency Services Fund reserve balance was $117,885.

·    As at 30 June 2018 the Emergency Services Fund reserve balance was $148,736.

·    $22,500 was paid to SLSNR in January 2018 and up to $10,000 per year allocated to ESF promotion and recognition advertising and signage for use at Northland events and ESF recipient sites.

·    The total funds in reserve for the purpose of the calculations below is $140,736.

 

The distribution of the reserve funds based on the above is set out in table 3 below

 

Emergency Services Fund Recipient

Annual Allocation 2015/18
(GST Exclusive)

Pro-Rata percentage of Reserve Balance

Amount already paid to Fund Recipient

Balance to pay to Fund Recipient

Annual Allocation 2018/21
(GST Exclusive)

NEST

$525,000

 (64%)

-

$104,471

$525,000

SLSNR

$120,000

 (15%)

$22,500

$1,985

$200,000

ST JOHN

$90,000

 (11%)

-

$17,626

 

$90,000

COASTGUARD

$84,000

 (10%)

-

$16,324

 

$84,000

Total

$819,000

 

$22,500

$140,736

$899,000

 

 

 

 


 

Considerations

1.      Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Use and distribute the accumulated ESF reserve funds to: up to $10,000 per year for advertising and promotional materials, with the remainder distributed to fund recipients in direct proportion to current allocations.

Provides for promotion and recognition of the ESF and recipient emergency services and is a logical and straightforward distribution amongst recipients.

Up to $10,000 less per year for distribution directly to ESF recipients.

2

As for 1 above, with no allocation for advertising and promotion materials.

Up to $10,000 more per year for distribution directly to ESF recipients.

Little or no promotion of the ESF.

3

Use some other than proportional distribution formula.

None apparent.

Less logical and straightforward.

The staff’s recommended option is option 1.

2.      Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long-Term Plan and/or is part of council’s day to day activities.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

Being a purely administrative matter, Community views, Māori impact statement, Financial implications and Implementation issues are not applicable.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Tony Phipps

Title:

Group Manager - Customer Services - Community Resilience

Date:

06 February 2019

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 6.1

19 February 2019

p

 

TITLE:

Treasury Management Policy

ID:

A1102988

From:

Dave Tams, Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

 

Executive Summary

This report seeks council approval of the Treasury Management Policy and the financial instruments and named counterparties and limits, and the changes to the Terms of Reference of the Audit and Finance Working Party and the delegations, which are required to make this policy operational.

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Treasury Management Policy’ by Dave Tams, Group Manager Corporate Excellence and dated 3 December 2018 be received.

2.         That an update to the Terms of Reference of the Audit and Finance Working Party to include ‘recommend new borrowing to council’ be approved.

3.         That the following updates to the Financial Delegations from the council to officers be approved:

a.      Change the ‘Overall management’ delegation to ‘Overall responsibility for day to day treasury management activities including establishing appropriate structures, procedures and controls’ and delegate this to the General Manager – Corporate Excellence.

b.     Delegate the General Manager – Corporate Excellence to ensure financial policies comply with legislation.

c.      Remove the delegation to the Chief Executive Officer to approve new counterparties and counterparty limits.

d.     Remove the delegation to the Chief Executive Officer to enter international swaps and derivatives.

4.         That the Delegations Manual be amended accordingly to reflect recommendation 2 above and to make other minor changes for consistency and clarity, including updating references to Treasury Management policies.

5.         That the financial instruments be approved:

Category

Financial instrument

Cash management and borrowing

Bank overdraft

Committed cash advance and bank accepted bill facilities (short term and long-term loan facilities)

Floating rate note (FRN)

Fixed rate note (MTN)

Investments <181 days

Short term bank deposits

Bank registered certificates of deposit (RCDs)

Investments (other)

LGFA borrower notes

Bank term deposits linked to pre-funding maturing debt

Interest rate risk management

Forward rate agreements (FRAs) on bank bills

Interest rate options on:

·    Bank bills (purchased caps and one for one collars)

·    Interest rate swaptions (purchased swaptions and one for one collars only)

 

6.         That the named counterparties and limits be approved:


Counterparty/issuer

Maximum investments per counterparty ($m)

NZ Government

Unlimited

Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA)

20.0

NZ registered banks:

·    ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited

·    ASB Bank Limited

·    Bank of New Zealand (BNZ)

·    Kiwibank Limited

·    Westpac New Zealand Limited

20.0

 

Background

The last treasury management document: ‘Treasury Risk Management Policy including liability and investment policies’ was long, included two other policies, and had extensive operational detail.  For the 2018–2028 Long Term Plan process, the Treasury Management Policy was streamlined into three smaller documents.

The Investment Policy and Liability Management Policy are required by sections 104 and 105 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), and were approved by council as part of the 2018–2028 Long Term Plan process.  The Treasury Management Policy (TMP) gives policy and operational guidelines and limits for council’s treasury management activities.

During the development of the TMP, staff found a gap between the Liability Management Policy - which identifies that the Audit and Finance Working Party is responsible for recommending new borrowing to council - and the Terms of Reference (TOR) of the working party - which is silent on this matter.  Staff recommend that council approve an amendment to the TOR to remedy this inconsistency.

The Chief Executive Officer and Audit and Finance Working Party reviewed the draft TMP during September and October 2018.  It was then taken to the 17 October 2018 council workshop, and consulted with the Executive Leadership Team at its 1 November 2018 meeting.

The revised TMP contains altered responsibilities – some of which will require changes to the Financial Delegations from the council to officers in the Delegations Manual, as outlined in Attachment 2.

The financial instruments outlined in the TMP were approved by council in the previous treasury policy.  Staff recommend that this continues.  Since that policy, interest rate swaps and derivatives have been removed from the list, as these are not used by council.  Staff recommend that council approves the list of financial instruments, as outlined in the TMP.  Once this list is approved, any other financial instrument must be specifically approved by the council on a case-by-case basis and only be applied to the one singular transaction being approved.

The counterparties and limits summary guide in the TMP was approved by council in the previous treasury policy.  Staff recommend that council expand on this summary guide by approving the existing counterparties on a named basis as outlined in Attachment 3.

Once this list is approved, any new named counterparties must be approved by council.

 

Considerations

Recommendations 2, 3d, 4, 5 and 6 are of low impact, as they confirm the status quo.

Recommendations 3a and 3b give the General Manager – Corporate Excellence greater responsibility for the treasury management function.

Recommendation 3c increases the responsibilities of council, where they once sat with the CEO.

 

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Approve the financial instruments and named counterparties and limits, and the changes to the TOR of the Audit and Finance Working Party and the delegations.

The TMP and council approvals are clear and consistent, and the TMP is fully operational.

Slower approval of new counterparties, international swaps and derivatives, and financial instruments.

2

Do not approve the financial instruments and named counterparties and limits, and the changes to the TOR of the Audit and Finance Working Party and the delegations.

Status quo is retained.  No implementation work is required.

The TMP is not fully operational, so will need to be amended.

3

Approve all but recommendations 2, 3d, 4, 5 and 6.

Status quo.

The TMP is not fully operational, so will need to be amended.

4

Approve all but 3a and 3b.

Responsibilities stay at CEO level.  No implementation work is required.

The TMP is not fully operational, so will need to be amended.

5

Approve all but recommendation 3c.

Approval of new named counterparties could occur faster in future.

The TMP is not fully operational, so will need to be amended.

Staff recommend option 1.

 

Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.

 

Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The decision is consistent with policy and legislative requirements.

Being a purely operational matter, Community Views and the Māori Impact Statement are not applicable.

 

Financial implications

Making the TMP operational does not have any direct financial implications, but it does change how some of council’s financial decisions are made.

 

Implementation

The General Manager – Corporate Excellence will ensure the treasury procedures, and that both the Treasury Management Policy, and the treasury procedures are maintained and complied with.

 

Attachment 1: Treasury Management Policy DRAFT

Attachment 2: Treasury Management Policy - Proposed changes to Delegations Manual

Attachment 3: Named counterparties and limits 29 8 2018  

 

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

04 February 2019

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.1

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.1

19 February 2019Attachment 2

Treasury Management Policy

Proposed changes to Delegations Manual: Financial Delegations from the Council to Officer

Delegation

Delegated to:

Proposed changes

Reason for change

Overall management of day to day treasury management activities including establishing appropriate structures, procedures and controls.

Chief Executive

Text change: “Overall responsibility for day to day…”

Delegated to: General Manager – Corporate Excellence

Clarification.

 

As per Treasury Management Policy.

Borrowing and investment

Undertaking new borrowing or re-financing of existing debt in accordance with LTP / AP, requirements of the LGA 2002, approved policies, including Treasury Management Policy, counterparties, approved expenditure limits and any relevant council resolutions.

Approve new counterparties & counterparty limits.

Chief Executive

Text change: “…approved policies, including Investment, Liability Management and Treasury Management Policies, counterparties…”

 

Delete text: “Approve new counterparties & counterparty limits.”

As per new policy structure.

 

 

 

 

 

As per Treasury Management Policy, this now sits with council.

Investments – in accordance with Treasury Management Policy, Statement of Investment Policy & Objectives (SIPO) & relevant sub-committee or working party Terms of Reference.

Chief Executive

Group Manager – Corporate Excellence

Text change: “– in accordance with Investment Policy, Treasury Management Policy, Statement of Investment…”

As per new policy structure.

Compliance with legislation

Ensuring the Treasury Management Policy and other financial policies included in Part 6 subpart 3 of LGA 2002 comply with existing and new legislation.

Chief Executive

Group Manager – Corporate Excellence

Text change: “Ensuring the financial policies included in Part 6 subpart 3 of LGA 2002 comply with existing and new legislation.”

 

Delegated to: General Manager – Corporate Excellence

Exclude reference to Treasury Management Policy as this no longer contains content required by the LGA.

 

As per Treasury Management Policy.

International Swaps & Derivatives

Enter into ISDA agreements with NZ Banks as required to fulfill investment objectives within LTP / AP and relevant council policies.

Chief Executive

Remove delegation

Swaps and derivatives have been removed from the financial instruments to be approved, as they are not used.

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.1

19 February 2019Attachment 3

Named counterparties and limits

This expands on the counterparties and limits summary guide in the Schedule of Treasury Limits in the Treasury Management Policy (TMP). Any new named counterparties must be approved by council.

Counterparty/issuer

Credit ratings required in TMP

Credit rating at 28.8.2018

Recommended limit $m

NZ Government

N/A

N/A

Unlimited

Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA)

N/A

N/A

20.0

ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited

Long term: A-

Short term: A2

Standard and Poor’s: AA-

Moody’s: A1

20.0

ASB Bank Limited

Long term: A-

Short term: A2

Standard and Poor’s: AA-

Moody’s: A1

20.0

Bank of New Zealand (BNZ)

Long term: A-

Short term: A2

Standard and Poor’s: AA-

Moody’s: A1

20.0

Kiwibank Limited

Long term: A-

Short term: A2

Standard and Poor’s: A

Moody’s: A1

20.0

Westpac New Zealand Limited

Long term: A-

Short term: A2

Standard and Poor’s: AA-

Moody’s: A1

20.0

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 6.2

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Adoption of Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 and approval to consult

ID:

A1157911

From:

Robyn Broadhurst, Policy Analyst and Kyla Carlier, Corporate Planning Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The purpose of this report is to present the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 for adoption, and approval to commence consultation using the special consultative procedure set out in section 83 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA).

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Adoption of Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 and approval to consult ’ by Robyn Broadhurst, Policy Analyst and Kyla Carlier, Corporate Planning Manager and dated 31 January 2019, be received.

2.         That council adopts the Statement of Proposal and the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 (Attachment 1 pertaining to Item 6.2 of the 19 February 2019 council agenda) for the purposes of consultation, pursuant to section 150 of the LGA, and that this be carried out in conjunction with consultation on the Annual Plan 2019/20.

3.         That council delegates to the Chief Executive the authority to make any necessary minor formatting, typographical and administrative changes to the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 prior to formal public consultation.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Council maintains a schedule of fees and charges in what was previously referred to as the Charging Policy (hereafter referred to as User Fees and Charges schedule) and this is reviewed and updated annually.  The User Fees and Charges schedule sets out charges fixed and/or authorised under various enactments including: Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA); Local Government and Official Information and Meetings Act 1987; Local Government Act 2002 (LGA); Building Act 2004; Biosecurity Act 1993; and Property Law Act 2007.

 

Section 150 of the LGA sets out the process by which a local authority may prescribe fees and charges in respect of any matter provided for either under a bylaw, or under any other piece of legislation if that legislation does not specifically authorise the local authority to charge a fee.  If not part of a bylaw, fees and charges prescribed under section 150 of the LGA must be prescribed following consultation using the principles of consultation (section 82 of the LGA).

 

In terms of fees and charges authorised by the RMA, a local authority can fix a charge only in the manner set out in section 150 of the LGA, and after using the special consultative procedure set out in section 83 of the LGA.

 

The last review of the User Fees and Charges schedule was carried out during the process of developing the Long Term Plan 2018–2028, which also set out inflationary increases for the coming years.  At this time, RMA fees were set within the User Fees and Charges schedule and approved inflation increases applied. 

 

To ensure that the appropriate process is followed for the setting of charges under the RMA, the special consultative procedure is being used for the development of this Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20.

 

The Biosecurity Act 1993 authorises a local authority to fix charges for cost recovery, however it does not set out the process by which this should be done.  Council is therefore referred to the decision-making requirements set out in Part 6 of the Local Government Act, and is undertaking a consultation process so that the council can be informed of community views.

 

Changes proposed

Council undertakes an annual review of fees and charges as part of the relevant annual or long term planning process.  This ensures that the fees and charges are updated using, at minimum, the principles of consultation.

 

The Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 is very similar to the current Charging Policy, with several minor amendments and updates to fees, charges, and policy proposed.  These include inflationary increases, clarification to wording, minor updates to charges, and removal of redundant charges.

 

Due to recent changes in the RMA, three new charges have been added for deemed permitted activities, new moorings in a moorings area, and reinstatement of a mooring following suspension/ cancellation.

 

A new structure for charging water permit holders is also proposed to ensure fees and charges are fair, equitable and relevant to the amount consented.

 

More information on the changes, and a consideration of alternatives, can be found in the attached Statement of Proposal on the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20.

Considerations

1.      Options

Consultation on the charges set out in the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 is required under section 150 of the LGA, and the special consultative procedure under section 83 of the LGA is being used to provide the appropriate and most prudent process for adoption of charges authorised under the RMA.  Preparation of material setting out the proposal, a draft of the schedule, details of the proposed changes, and making these publicly available, are key requirements of consultation.

Options are set out below.  Staff recommend option 1, to adopt the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 and associated Statement of Proposal for consultation concurrently with the consultation process of the Annual Plan 2019/20.

 

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Adopt the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 and associated Statement of Proposal for consultation

Fees and charges can be updated for the 2019/20 financial year.

Resources will need to be allocated to the consultation process.

2

Do not adopt the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 and associated Statement of Proposal for consultation

Resources will not need to be allocated to the consultation process.

Fees and charges will not be able to be updated for the 2019/20 financial year, resulting in under recovery of costs.

 

2.      Significance and engagement

Section 76AA of the LGA directs that council must adopt a policy setting out how significance

will be determined, and the level of engagement that will be triggered.  This policy assists

council in determining how to achieve compliance with LGA requirements in relation to

decisions.

 

This decision itself is of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is for the purpose of achieving compliance with sections 83 and 150 of the LGA and does not, in itself, impact the community other than to provide them with information.

 

The decision to adopt the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 for consultation, while not significant in itself, will enable council in the future to make decisions on charges while having full regard to community views in relation to the proposals set out in the schedule.  This will assist council in achieving compliance with procedures in relation to decisions as set out in Part 6 of the LGA.

 

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The decision to adopt the Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 and associated Statement of Proposal will achieve compliance with sections 83 and 150 of the LGA.  This decision will also achieve compliance with council’s Significance and Engagement Policy, in particular ‘We will consult when we are required to by law, when a proposal is considered significant, and when we need more information on options for responding to an issue’.

 

Further considerations

The decisions contained within this report will enable consultation, which will provide council

with feedback on community views and potential impacts on Māori.  Any financial impacts or

implementation issues are addressed in the attached documentation.

 

Further consideration of community views, impacts on Māori, financial impacts and

implementation issues will be addressed through the deliberations process and subsequent

council decision to adopt the final schedule of User Fees and Charges 2019/20.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Draft User Fees and Charges 2019/20 and Statement of Proposal  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

12 February 2019

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.2

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 6.3

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Adoption of the Annual Plan 2019/20 Supporting Information

ID:

A1159110

From:

Kyla Carlier, Corporate Planning Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report seeks council approval and adoption of the supporting information to the Annual Plan 2019/20, and for this to be released for consultation purposes.

The supporting information underpins the Consultation Document for the development of the Annual Plan 2019/20.

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Adoption of the Annual Plan 2019/20 Supporting Information’ by Kyla Carlier, Corporate Planning Manager and dated 1 February 2019, be received.

2.         That council adopts the supporting information for the Annual Plan 2019/20 (Attachment 1 pertaining to Item 6.3 of the 19 February 2019 council agenda) for the purposes of consultation, pursuant to sections 95 and 95A of the LGA.

3.         That council delegates to the Group Manager – Strategy, Governance and Engagement the authority to make any necessary minor formatting, typographical and administrative changes to the supporting information prior to formal public consultation.

 

Background/Tuhinga

The Local Government Act 2002 (the LGA) requires the council to develop an Annual Plan for years two and three of the Long Term Plan.

The LGA directs that a clear and simple consultation document must be produced, in conjunction with supporting information, for the purposes of consultation.  The adoption of the consultation document is covered in a separate agenda item.  The consultation document is not permitted to contain or have attached to it a draft of the Annual Plan, a full draft of any policy, or detailed information that is not necessary to explain the differences from the Long Term Plan 2018–2028.

All supporting information that the consultation document relies upon must be adopted in advance of the Consultation Document (section 95A(4) of the Local Government Act).  The Annual Plan 2019/20 Supporting Information document contains the information that is relied on by the content of the consultation document.  This agenda relates to the adoption of the supporting information only.

 

Supporting information

Information must be provided in addition to that in the consultation document, to provide the level of detail and reference information that is sufficient for the community to be informed on the changes proposed.

The supporting information for the Annual Plan 2019/20 is divided into two sections as follows:

(1)       Moving forward:

·    A welcome message

·    A re-cap of the direction set out in the Long Term Plan 2018–2028

·    A summary of the initiatives proposed that differ from what was proposed in the Long Term Plan.

 

(2)       Finances:

·    Funding Impact statement

·    Rates (including rating examples and a summary of rates)

·    Financial statements.

 

Considerations

1.      Options

Consultation on an annual plan is required under section 95 of the Local Government Act (LGA) if the proposed annual plan contains significant or material differences from the content of the Long Term Plan, for the financial year to which the plan relates. 

 

Consultation requires the production of a consultation document, which must not contain any detailed information not necessary to identify differences from the Long Term Plan, or any full draft of any policy.  Section 95A of the LGA requires that the information that is relied on by the content of the consultation document is adopted by council before the consultation document is adopted.

 

Two options are set out below.  Staff recommend option 1, to adopt the Annual Plan 2019/20 Supporting Information document for consultation.

 

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Adopt the Annual Plan 2019/20 Supporting Information for consultation.

Council will achieve compliance with the LGA 2002, and the community will be able to review the information that is relied on by the content of the consultation document in a convenient location.

None

2

Do not adopt the Annual Plan 2019/20 Supporting Information for consultation.

None.

Consultation will not occur in accordance with the requirements of the LGA, and council may not be able to implement the proposed changes for the 2019/20 financial year.

 

2.      Significance and engagement

Section 76AA of the LGA directs that council must adopt a policy setting out how significance will be determined, and the level of engagement that will be triggered.  This policy assists council in determining how to achieve compliance with LGA requirements in relation to decisions.

This decision itself is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is for the purpose of achieving compliance with sections 82A and 95 of the LGA and does not, in itself, impact the community other than to provide them with information.

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The decision to adopt the Annual Plan 2019/20 Supporting Information will achieve compliance with section 95A of the Local Government Act 2002.  This decision will also achieve compliance with council’s Significance and Engagement Policy, in particular ‘We will consult when we are required to by law, when a proposal is considered significant, and when we need more information on options for responding to an issue’.

Further considerations

The decisions contained within this report will enable consultation, which will provide council with feedback on community views and potential impacts on Māori.  Any financial impacts or implementation issues are addressed in the attached documentation. 

Further consideration of community views, impacts on Māori, financial impacts and implementation issues will be addressed through the deliberations process and subsequent council decision to adopt the final Annual Plan 2019/20.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Annual Plan 2019/20 - Supporting Information  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

07 February 2019

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.3

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 6.4

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Adoption of the Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document and Approval to Consult

ID:

A1158997

From:

Kyla Carlier, Corporate Planning Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The purpose of this report is to present the consultation document for the Annual Plan 2019/20.

 

The report seeks the adoption of this document and approval to commence consultation, using the principles of consultation under section 82 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA).

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Adoption of the Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document and Approval to Consult’ by Kyla Carlier, Corporate Planning Manager and dated 31 January 2019, be received.

2.         That council adopts and approves for release the Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document (included as Attachment 1 pertaining to Item 6.4 of the 19 February 2019 council agenda) for consultation pursuant to sections 82, 95 and 95A of the Local Government Act 2002.

3.         That council delegates to the Group Manager – Strategy, Governance and Engagement the authority to make any necessary minor formatting, typographical, and administrative changes to the Consultation Document prior to formal public consultation.

 

Background/Tuhinga

The corporate planning and finance teams have been working with council to develop an Annual Plan for the 2019/20 financial year.  The Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) requires a consultation document (CD) to be adopted by council and released for consultation, in conjunction with a supporting information document.  The adoption of the supporting information is covered in agenda item 6.3.

The Annual Plan 2019/20 will set out budgets for work scheduled for year two of the Long Term Plan 2018–2028(LTP).  The CD provides a re-cap of our LTP direction, a summary of the matters that are proposed to be included in the Annual Plan 2019/20 that differ from the direction set out in the LTP, and directs people to supporting documentation for more detail where appropriate. 

The matters of difference outlined in the CD includes the following new spending:

·    Helping our computer systems cope with the extra workload ($377,500);

·    Buy vital water monitoring gear ($37,800);

·    Keeping the Northern Transportation Alliance ticking along ($65,000);

·    Replacing the engines on the Waikare a year earlier than planned ($110,000).

 

Please refer to Attachment 1 for a copy of the Consultation Document.

The CD will be the primary method for engaging with council’s communities during a period of consultation that will run from 4 March – 5 April 2019.  This consultation period coincides with consultation on council’s user fees and charges, with the processes run in parallel. 

Communication tools appropriate to the relatively minor consultation points (when compared to other years) will be used, and feedback will be invited via an online form, email, hardcopy, social media, and verbally.

It is not proposed that hearings be held as part of this process, but there will be an opportunity for members of the community to talk to councillors should they wish, by appointment.  A day has been set aside for this in councillors’ diaries on Wednesday 10 April 2019.

Council will be invited to discuss each of the proposals in the context of feedback received at a deliberations meeting, which is scheduled for 7 May 2019.  It is proposed that final adoption of the Annual Plan 2019/20 takes place at an extraordinary council meeting scheduled for 4 June 2019.

 

Considerations

1.      Options

Two options are set out below.  Staff recommend option 1, to adopt the Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document for consultation.

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Adopt the Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document for consultation.

Council will achieve compliance with the LGA 2002, will be informed of community views when making decisions on the Annual Plan 2019/20, and will be able to proceed with proposals for the 2019/20 financial year.

None

2

Do not adopt the Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document.

None

Consultation will not occur in accordance with the requirements of the LGA, and council will not be able to implement the proposed changes for the 2019/20 financial year.

 

2.      Significance and engagement

Section 76AA of the LGA directs that council must adopt a policy setting out how significance will be determined, and the level of engagement that will be triggered.  This policy assists council in determining how to achieve compliance with LGA requirements in relation to decisions.

This decision itself is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is for the purpose of achieving compliance with sections 82A and 95 of the LGA and does not, in itself, impact the community other than to provide them with information.

The Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document has been prepared because the proposals in the annual plan are considered to be significant or material.  The decision to adopt the Consultation Document, while not significant in itself, will enable council in the future to make decisions on the Annual Plan itself while having full regard to community views in relation to the proposals set out in the document.  This will assist council in achieving compliance with procedures in relation to decisions as set out in section 79 of the LGA.

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

Consultation on an annual plan is required under section 95 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) if the proposed annual plan contains significant or material differences from the content in the Long Term Plan 2018–2028 for the financial year to which the plan relates; preparation and adoption of an Annual Plan Consultation Document is required under section 82A of the LGA as part of consultation.

The decision to adopt the Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document will achieve compliance with sections 82A and 95 of the Local Government Act 2002.

Further considerations

The decisions contained within this report will enable consultation, which will provide council with feedback on community views and potential impacts on Māori.  Any financial impacts or implementation issues are addressed in the attached consultation document and the supporting information document. 

Further consideration of community views, impacts on Māori, financial impacts and implementation issues will be addressed through the deliberations process and subsequent council decision to adopt the final Annual Plan 2019/20.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Annual Plan 2019/20 Consultation Document  l

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

07 February 2019

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.4

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 6.5

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Manea Footprints of Kupe - Request for a funding contribution from Council

ID:

A1132029

From:

Jon Trewin, Economic Policy Advisor and Darryl Jones, Economist

 

Executive summary

The Manea Footprints of Kupe proposal at Opononi (‘Manea’) involves the establishment of a cultural heritage tourism and education centre, including displays, guided tours and interactive performances, with a total development cost of $8.2 million.  The proponents are seeking project grant funding of $500,000 from council towards this total cost.  In September 2018, council sought a recommendation from the Northland Inc. Board on the viability of the project.  The Northland Inc. Board has now formally recommended that council invest the requested sum in the Manea proposal (Attachment 1).  Council staff also concur with this recommendation. However, there is presently not enough available funding in the IGR to meet this request in full.  The purpose of this agenda item is therefore to recommend the transfer of $500,000 from the Community Investment Fund (CIF) into the Investment and Growth Reserve (IGR) and to allocate $500,000 from the Investment and Growth Reserve to the Manea proposal, subject to conditions being met.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Manea Footprints of Kupe - Request for a funding contribution from Council’ by Jon Trewin, Economic Policy Advisor and Darryl Jones, Economist and dated 22 November 2018, be received.

2.         That $500,000 be transferred from the Community Investment Fund into the Investment and Growth Reserve once the conditions of funding set out in recommendation 3 have been met.

3.         That $500,000 (excluding GST) be allocated as Enabling Investment funding from the Investment and Growth Reserve to the Manea Footprints of Kupe project subject to the following conditions being met.

a.         All resource and building consents are obtained for all elements of the project to proceed;

b.        Fixed price construction tenders that permits all elements of the project to proceed is secured;

c.         All funding has been secured to cover the development of the entire project;

d.        A funding agreement is signed between Te Hua o Te Kawariki Trust, Manea Footprints of Kupe Ltd, Far North Holdings (FNHL), and council that includes:

i.          a list of key performance indicators;

ii.         a schedule of payment instalments that are linked to construction milestones with the first payment not occurring prior to 1 November 2019;

iii.        an undertaking that any cost overruns for the construction of the buildings will be covered by supplementary funding and not by reducing the experience/fit-out development; and

iv.        an undertaking that Manea will be held in perpetuity for the benefit of the local community and that should it ever be sold into private ownership that council will be refunded its $500,000 funding allocation.

e.        Confirmation that an overdraft facility of $200,000 has been secured.

 

Background

The Manea Footprints of Kupe project has been developed by the Te Hua o te Kawariki Trust (the Trust) to establish a cultural heritage tourism and education centre in Opononi that would celebrate the journeys of Kupe.  Manea will tell the stories (footprints) of Kupe using a combination of guided tours, 4D interactive performances and technology stations.  This will be complemented by taonga repatriated from various museums. 

 

At its meeting on 21 November 2017, council allocated $40,000 from the IGR as Feasibility Assessment and Business Case funding to assist with the validation of development plans, quantity surveying, technical review, architectural plans and producing high definition images to attract investment. 

 

The project is being supported by the Shane Lloyd Family Trust (owners of the Copthorne Hotel and Resort Hokianga) and FNHL. The experience involves the construction of a building to be built by FNHL and leased to the Trust, making up the Manea – Footprints of Kupe Education and Heritage Centre (its full title). 

 

FNHL has agreed to purchase the land from the Lloyd Family Trust once all the funding has been secured.  FNHL will also project manage the build, and will incur ‘in kind’ costs in this regard.  Once Manea has opened, FNHL will continue to own the building and land that it sits on, and lease the building to the Trust at a rate of $120,000 per annum (an annual rate of return of 10% for FNHL on an initial investment of $1.2M). 

 

A charitable limited liability company, Manea Footprints of Kupe Ltd, has been established by the Trust to operate the business. The Board of Directors includes a number of experienced individuals in the tourism sector including Shane Lloyd, Anton Haigh, and Northland Inc. board members Nicole Anderson and Denis Callesen.  Profits not required for operational or capital requirements of the business will be returned back to the Trust for community charitable purposes.  As per the deed of Trust this includes any purpose which promotes the educational, spiritual, economic, social or cultural advancement of iwi and hapu in the Hokianga including the provision of facilities or is otherwise for the benefit of communities in the Hokianga.

 

It is understood that the Trust intends to purchase the land and buildings from FNHL as funding allows, with the intention of this being several years after opening.  The Trust will be given first right of refusal to purchase in this regard.  In addition, as part of the funding agreement with MBIE for Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) funding, FNHL cannot sell or dispose of the land and buildings without approval from MBIE and the Trust for a period of 20 years.

 

Manea business case

 

The attraction is likely to have positive economic benefits for the Hokianga area and complement existing attractions such as Footprints Waipoua.  For example, the total economic impact from visitors is estimated to be approximately $5.5M per annum, and the total economic impact from construction is estimated to be approximately $12M.

 

The business case for the project has evolved over time.  An update to the business case in January 2019 (Attachment 2) envisages 17 FTEs employed by the end of Year 3 and onwards.  A ‘conservative’ estimate of 44,100 visitors in Year 1 rising to 59,000 in Year 3 has been adopted based on existing operator estimates and accepted by Deloitte as reasonable (p.32 of business case).  By comparison other figures produced by Crowe Horwath, commissioned to provide a ‘second opinion’ to the operator figures, suggested visitor numbers could be 10-20% higher.  As with other attractions, most of these visitors will arrive in the peak summer months of December to February dropping off considerably into the winter season.

 

A varied pricing structure will be used, with the majority of visitors paying $45 (gross).  The overall net revenue for the business will be less factoring in GST and commission to tour operators. Local visitors will pay a koha. Based on the above visitor numbers, the overall three-year profit and loss calculations in the business case estimate a company profit (after GST calculations) of $207,537 in 2020/21 (Year 1), dropping to $160,631 in 2021/22 (Year 2) and rising to $591,655 in 2022/23 (Year 3) (page 44 of business case). Overall it is estimated that a cumulative profit of $959,823 will be generated by 2022/23. However, the growth in company profit in Year 3 assumes the removal of the requirement to fund the lease, due to a desired purchase of the land and buildings from FNHL by the Trust in 2022/23. Clearly this intended purchase is dependent on the projected growth of visitor numbers and retail income in the business case.

 

Northland Inc. has carried out extensive testing of the financial model and its various assumptions.  Their analysis suggests that an overdraft facility of up to $200,000 (rather than $100,000) should be obtained by Manea Footprints of Kupe Ltd to cover a possible lower number of visitors during the first year of operation than assumed in the business case. 

 

The proponents were successful in receiving an allocation of $4.6 million from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) in February 2018, one of the first PGF projects announced.  However, changes to the project design have since occurred including relocating the ticket office, additional car park development, and the reposition and orientation of the building to face the harbour entrance.  This has increased the project development cost and triggered the request for council investment. 

 

The total indicative project cost, as of January 2019, is $ 8.2 million and can be broadly broken down into three components (Table 1).  It should be noted that this cost only includes gravel carparking and temporary pre-fabricated toilet and reception facilities.  It is envisaged that the sealing of the carpark and a future reception building will be added as funding is applied for/becomes available, e.g. via the Tourism Infrastructure Fund.

 

Table 1. Breakdown for project costs by component

Cost element

Total

Share of total

Comments

Trust costs and company operation development

$919,646

11%

 

Experience development

$3,395,746

41%

Includes design, fitout, content and equipment.

Construction

$3,881,903

48%

Includes concept design, site works, building shell, ancillary buildings and contingency.

TOTAL

$8,197,295

100%

 

 

 

Funding sources and amount still required

 

FNHL is contributing $1.2 million ($0.4 million for the purchase of the land and $0.8 million for construction).  A contribution of $1.1 million was sought from Foundation North in 2018.  However due to oversubscription of the fund, only 56% of the sought-after funding was awarded.  To make up the shortfall, funding from the Lotteries New Zealand Significant Project Fund is again being sought and the Trust are planning on making an application to this fund.  The proponents have also indicated that the Ministry of Culture and Heritage’s Regional Culture and Heritage Fund – a fund of last resort – could also be used to cover any funding gap but they need to demonstrate that regional funding sources have been exhausted. 

 

Table 2. Breakdown for project costs by funding source

Funding agency

Total

Share of total

Comments

Provincial Growth Fund

$4,600,000

55%

Awarded

Far North Holdings

$800,000

10%

Awarded – does not include ‘in-kind’ support, advice and project management, and the cost of land purchase ($400,000).

Foundation North

$653,439

8%

Awarded, however, due to oversubscription of the fund only 56% of the sought after $1.15M was awarded.

Lotteries NZ

$1,643,856

22%

To be applied for. Funding from Lotteries Significant Projects Fund was sought in June 2018, however, the application was unsuccessful. Feedback from Lotteries NZ was that the proponents should first seek funding from a regional fund. Another application will be submitted prior to the close of the next funding round in March 2019.

Northland Regional Council

$500,000

6%

Applied for (the subject of this agenda item)

Total

$8,197,295

100%

 

 

The proponents of the project are flexible on when council funding could be available – for example funding could be available to draw down towards the latter part of the build and fit-out (envisaged to be Q2 and Q3 of 2019/20).

 

In January 2019, the Northland Inc. Board formally recommended to council that the request for funding from the IGR be approved by council. The Board recommended two conditions:

 

1.    That the full quantum of project funding ($8.2M) be secured before any drawdown from IGR funds occurs. Any cost overrun for the building development be funded by supplemental funding and not from any funding to be used to develop the experience, fit-out or start-up operating costs.

2.    Following stress testing on the financial model, an overdraft of $200,000 is likely to be required (an extra $100,000).

 

Considerations

1.      Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Transfer $500,000 from the CIF to the IGR and then allocate $500,000 to Manea subject to conditions being met.

A good proportion (73%) of funding has already been secured.  Council funding would provide certainty and would allow the proponents of the project to show there is “skin in the game” from the region.

Can “piggyback” on PGF funding and agreed requirements from MBIE.

Would provide project funding to the west coast of Northland (Hokianga area) which has not historically received much investment from the IGR.

Would reduce the funds available in the CIF that could be invested in other projects or retained for growth (refer to Section 6 – Financial Implications below). 

2

Transfer a lesser amount from the CIF to the IGR and then allocate to Manea subject to conditions being met.

The advantages are  similar to Option 1 with the exception that a greater amount of funding would be retained in the CIF that could be invested in other projects or retained for growth.

Would reduce the funds available in the CIF that could be invested in other projects or retained for growth (refer to Section 6 – Financial Implications below).

Would not fully meet the requested sum of $500,000 and therefore the proponents would have to source this shortfall from elsewhere.

3

Decline the request for funding

Would maintain funding in the CIF for other projects or retained within the fund for growth.

Would provide proponents with a clear decision and therefore allow them to modify their funding applications to the Lotteries Significant Project Fund and other funding streams such as the Minister of Culture and Heritage’s Regional Culture and Heritage Fund (a fund of last resort).

Uncertainty would remain around the funding shortfall of $2,143,856.

$4.6M of central government funding awarded could be lost from the PGF if the project does not proceed.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1 as this option provides a regional contribution to a worthwhile project whilst safeguarding existing commitments budgeted in the IGR (refer to Section 6 – Financial Implications below).

The following conditions are recommended by staff to be set for Option 1 before funding is released:

 

a.         All resource and building consents are obtained for all elements of the project to proceed;

b.        Fixed price construction tenders that permits all elements of the project to proceed is secured;

c.         All funding has been secured to cover the development of the entire project;

d.        A funding agreement is signed between Te Hua o Te Kawariki Trust, Manea Footprints of Kupe Ltd, Far North Holdings (FNHL) and council that includes:

i.          a list of key performance indicators;

ii.         a schedule of payment instalments that are linked to construction milestones with the first payment not occurring prior to 1 November 2019;

iii.        an undertaking that any cost overruns for the construction of the buildings will be covered by supplementary funding and not by reducing the experience development; and

iv.        an undertaking that Manea will be held in perpetuity for the benefit of the local community and that should it ever be sold into private ownership that council will be refunded its $500,000 funding allocation.

e.        Confirmation that an overdraft facility of $200,000 has been secured.

 

2.      Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy as the ability to transfer money between the CIF and IGR and allocate funding from the IGR has been specifically considered and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan.

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

 The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with the IGR criteria, the Long Term Plan 2018–2028, and council’s decision-making process as prescribed in the Local Government Act 2002.

 

Further considerations

4.      Community views

The project is supported by local marae through the Te Hua o Te Kawariki Trust.  Shane Lloyd Family Trust operates and manages several local businesses and has a mutual partnership with the Trust to contribute meaningfully to the local community through a Māori cultural tourism project.  The project proponents have held several community meetings, leading to some of the changes in layout and design described above.

5.      Māori impact statement

The project is being led by Te Hua o Te Kawariki Trust who represent four local maraes who are invested in the project.  The project will showcase Māori culture and contribute to economic development in the Hokianga area. There is no known opposition to this project from Māori.

6.      Financial implications

Staff have reviewed funding available in the IGR and conclude that there are insufficient funds available to cover the $500,000 investment requested in the timeframe required without significantly impacting on existing commitments. Presently the IGR has a forecast closing balance of $238,000 in 2018/19 taking into account current funding commitments and policy settings.  The following table shows that there are insufficient funds available to allocate $500,000 from the IGR for Manea, assuming all other commitments are maintained and providing for ongoing project development ($300,000) and enabling investment funding.

 

Table 1. Investment and Growth Reserve cash flow balance

Cumulative value for the three years 2019/20-2021/22
based on current funding commitments and settings

 

 

Note:

Analysis does not take into account other income, e.g. interest earned.

 

The Long Term Plan 2018-2028 allows council to make discretionary additional input from the Community Investment Fund (CIF) into the IGR as needed for economic development initiatives provided the CIF does not fall below $12.5 million.  The current CIF balance (as at 31 December 2018) is $13,862,081. Deducting $12.5 million from this, we can assume an available funding envelope of $1,362,081 at present which could be transferred to the IGR (Table 2).

 

Table 2. Available funding from the Community Investment Fund

 

Note:

Analysis does not consider any gains in the value of the CIF.

 

Over the last few months, council’s managed funds (including CIF) have been hit by volatility in the global share market. This has had a negative effect on the performance of these funds, falling below the objective set. The performance of the CIF is however expected to improve in the year to 30 June 2019. However, this is contingent on global economic factors and the inherent risk of volatility in the stock market. 

 

In terms of the effect of the withdrawal of funding on the CIF under Option 1, a $500,000 withdrawal in 2019/20 (for example in Q2 November 2019) is projected to reduce gains in the fund by around $20,000, i.e. from $739,827 to $726,337 in 2019/20, with a closing forecast 2019/20 balance of $14,410,065.

 

7.      Implementation issues

The project will be implemented by Far North Holdings Limited who have been involved in developing a number of infrastructure projects in the Far North so no implementation issues are envisaged. 

 

Attachments

Attachment 1: Letter to NRC from NINC recommending Manea

Attachment 2: Manea Business and Development Plan - January 2019  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

13 February 2019

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.5

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.5

19 February 2019Attachment 2

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 6.6

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Environment Fund Criteria Review

ID:

A1156376

From:

Imogen Field, Land Management Advisor - Freshwater Improvement Project; Lorna Douglas, Eastern Coast Manager and Duncan Kervell, Land Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report proposes new Environment Fund criteria, to update the current criteria which were last reviewed in 2015.  The proposed changes aim to improve clarity for landowners and land management staff.  They will also introduce new project-specific fund criteria, to promote innovation and ensure equitable allocation of the overall fund, whilst targeting maximum environmental benefit and catchment priorities.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Environment Fund Criteria Review’ by Imogen Field, Land Management Advisor - Freshwater Improvement Project; Lorna Douglas, Eastern Coast Manager and Duncan Kervell, Land Manager and dated 24 January 2019, be received.

2.         That council approve the new Environment Fund criteria.

 

Background/Tuhinga

The Environment Fund criteria were last reviewed in 2015.

The criteria review process is to align years 2, 3 and 4 of the LTP and new Fresh Water Improvement Fund funding criteria for the Northern Wairoa Freshwater Improvement Fund (NWFIF) project.

Fencing buffer distance from waterway (e.g. metres from stream edge) will be specified clearly on the grant agreement schedule of works, based on a water quality risk analysis metric (to be developed by the NRC staff based on a literature review underway).

LTP Environment Funding Criteria and Tables

Table One: Proposed criteria compared with existing criteria

 

Current criteria

Proposed new criteria

·    Fencing General waterway:  fencing rivers, streams, drains and wetlands

·    Fencing for Soil Conservation: Erosion control permanent retirement fencing and afforestation

50% funding via delegated authority (DA)

 

Dairy farm cap: up to $5,000

 

Drystock caps:

·    Up to $10,000, 1-199ha

·    Up to $15,000, 200–599ha

·    Up to $20,000, 600+ha

Up to 50% funding via DA

 

Note: With waterway fence buffers defined and required

 

Equal dairy and drystock caps:

·    Up to 4ha ($2,000 limit)

·    Up to $5,000 for 4-49ha

·    Up to $10,000 for 50–199ha

·    Up to $15,000 for 200–599ha

·    Up to $20,000 for over 600ha

 

Top 150 wetlands and dune lakes

50% funding via DA or up to 100% with council approval

Retain

Terrestrial biodiversity projects

50% funding via DA

Retain

Planting

Traditionally granted approx. $1,000 of plants, 100% funded for riparian plants

Funds in 2019/20 available from 1BT Boost Year Fund, Hill Country Erosion Fund and Regional Afforestation Grant Scheme (RAGS)

Exceptional projects

Up to 100% for staff recommended exceptional projects not fitting other criteria, with council approval

Retain

 

Northern Wairoa Fresh Water Improvement Fund (NWFIF) Criteria

The Northern Wairoa Fresh Water Improvement Fund (NWFIF) Project has a specific set of objectives around water quality improvement.  These proposed criteria aim to structure a funding system using the NWFIF budget of $1.6m (over four years).  The key changes recommended are:

Multiple Year Funding applications:

·    Projects will be planned and budgeted for up to three years of treatment works via the Farm Environment Plan (FEP).  These projects will be recommended from the partnership and approved by council via the delegated authority process used for the Environment Fund.

 

·    NOTE: This proposed process provides more value to the Farm Environment Plan and helps guide and monitor implementation.

 

·    The NWFIF FEP and funding proposal provides for a wider diversity of works to be funded (see table two) to achieve the objectives of the project and improve the diversity of treatment types and extend the technical service of NRC staff.  

 

Table Two: Proposed qualifying works and % contribution from the FIF Environment Fund

Qualifying work categories 

Percentage contribution

Fencing

Up to 50%

Alternative Water Supplies

(Cost of troughs and tanks)

Up to 50% (will cover costs of troughs and tanks, with landowner contribution being installation and other materials required)

Native plant establishment and maintenance 

Up to 50%

Wetland construction and restoration *

Up to 100%

Detention bund construction 

Erosion tree planting

Up to 50%

Works to restore fish passage (culvert remediation, weirs, floodgates)

Up to 50%

 

* Due to the significance of wetland restoration the project can fund up to 100% for priority projects.

 

In order to recognise the landowner contribution, the retirement of land from grazing for wetlands can be valued as an in-kind contribution to the project at a rate of up to $2,500/ha at a minimum of 5ha.  This creates further incentives for wetland enhancement and improved farmer buy-in.

 

The NRC Environment Fund is in a transition period with potential regulation from Ministry for Environment ‘Essential Freshwater Packages’ and NRC Regional Plan regulations becoming operative.  As these regulations progress and additional funding becomes available (i.e. One Billion Trees and Freshwater Improvement Fund) the Environment Fund will need to be agile and require further review in the near future.  One of these changes may be to transition away from funding of stream fencing to other high value and non-regulated water quality initiatives (i.e. gully retirement, fencing of seeps).

 

Considerations

1.      Options

 

2.                    

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Approve proposed criteria for the Environment Fund and Northern Wairoa Fund

Improved efficiency and better environmental outcomes and FIF project progression.

Nil

2

Reject the proposed criteria for the Environment Fund and maintain status quo

 Nil

This will prevent the adoption of process to match criteria of new funding streams and LTP implementation. 

 

The staff’s recommended option is option 1.

2.      Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan (the increased fund budget helps meet the council and community’s aspirations for improved water quality.  It has also been a part of council’s day to day activities since 1996).

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

 Not applicable.

Further considerations

4.      Community views

The community is likely to support the revised criteria as the fund supports aspirations for clean water.

5.      Māori impact statement

Tangata whenua are likely to support the revised criteria as the fund supports aspirations for clean water.

 

6.      Financial implications

The total fund budget has already been approved by council under the LTP process.  The new criteria will still work within that budget, with grants approved by council via delegated authority.

7.      Implementation issues

No implementation issues.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Bruce Howse

Title:

Group Manager - Environmental Services

Date:

07 February 2019

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 6.7

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Inter-regional Marine Pest Management - Discussion Document

ID:

A1160314

From:

Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and Don McKenzie, Biosecurity Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

Executive summary

The purpose of this report is to seek council approval to release a discussion document and undertake an engagement process to seek feedback on the management of marine pests in the upper North Island.  This consultation project is a partnership between Northland Regional Council, Auckland Council, Waikato Regional Council, Bay of Plenty Regional Council, the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI), and the Department of Conservation (DOC).  The discussion document includes the option to develop consistent rules across the four regions to address marine pests.  The proposal to embark on a discussion document of this nature was endorsed by the Upper North Island Strategic Alliance (UNISA) in late 2017.

This consultation project would be run at the same time in the four participating regions as far as practicable using consistent engagement and communications processes (we anticipate the feedback period running from 18 March to 24 May 2019).  Feedback received will inform future decisions on marine pest management - and potentially, the development of an inter-regional marine pest pathway management plan under the Biosecurity Act 1993 across the four participating regions.  The discussion document is not a statutory process but would fulfil many of the consultation requirements if a regulatory mechanism under the Biosecurity Act 1993 (such as an inter-regional marine pest pathway plan) was to be progressed. 

It is recommended that council authorise the release of the draft discussion document and commencement of the engagement process (in conjunction with the project partners).  The draft discussion document is attached in Attachment 1 and an outline of the proposed consultation/ engagement approach is provided in the report.  The feedback received will be brought back to council for consideration once collated and assessed. 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Inter-regional Marine Pest Management - Discussion Document’ by Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and Don McKenzie, Biosecurity Manager and dated 5 February 2019, be received.

2.         That council approves the release of the draft discussion document and the associated consultation process.

3.         That council delegates authority to the Deputy Chief Executive to make minor changes to the discussion document prior to the start of the consultation (for the purpose of formatting, adding agency logo’s and minor changes to text).

4.         That council appoint a political spokesperson for the purposes of consultation in Northland being Councillor _____________. 

 

Background/Tuhinga

The threat of marine pest incursions is particularly high in the coastal waters of northern New Zealand.  This has been evident with the recent spread of pest species such as Mediterranean Fan Worm.  Northland’s coastal waters are particularly susceptible to incursions of marine pests given the range of habitats available, relatively benign climate and the high number of visiting and resident vessels that are a vector for spread (the movement of ‘fouled’ vessels is the biggest pathway for the spread of marine pests).  Northland also has significant cultural, natural heritage and economic values that are potentially impacted by marine pests.  These issues are also faced by neighbouring regions such as Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty, which in combination with Northland accommodate the majority of New Zealand’s vessel movements.

Controlling marine pests once established is extremely difficult and preventing their arrival is far more cost-effective – this is one of the reasons council recently developed a marine pest ‘pathway’ plan targeting the movement of bio-fouled vessels.  However, preventing the spread of marine pests is likely to be far more effective if a coordinated and consistent multi-region approach is adopted – there are also likely to be efficiency gains in implementation.  The concept of consistent rules (targeting hull-fouling) across the four regions has been identified as an option to address the issue. 

Pathway plans are a mechanism available to regional councils under the Biosecurity Act 1993.  They provide the ability to regulate activity that risks spreading pests rather than the pest itself (e.g. a rule on vessel hull fouling like those recently developed in Northland) – this is a more effective means of addressing risk than traditional pest management plans, which rely on pest presence or controlling the sale, distribution or release of pest species.  The Biosecurity Act also provides for one or more councils to jointly prepare a pest management plan or pathway management plan that applies across regions (a joint/inter-regional pest or pathway management plan), but requires that each council approve the procedural steps set out in the Act and each council has discretion over how costs are allocated in their respective regions.

A project to undertake initial scoping and consultation on an inter-regional approach to marine pest management was endorsed by UNISA in late 2017.  The project has been progressed through the Top of the North Biosecurity Group with partners being Northland Regional Council, Auckland Council, Waikato Regional Council, Bay of Plenty Regional Council, with support from MPI and DOC.  Council approved development of a draft discussion document at the meeting of 21 August 2018. The proposal has also been discussed with Te Taitokerau Māori Advisory Committee Working Party and the Māori Technical Advisory Group. 

Staff in conjunction with the project partners have now developed the draft discussion document setting out options to manage the incursion and spread of marine pests.  These focus on key pathways.  The options include:

·        Develop consistent rules requiring clean vessel across the four biggest boating regions – Northland, Auckland, Waikato, and Bay of Plenty.

·        Go further – make rules for other pathways like ballast water, aquaculture, bilge water and marine equipment.

·        Rely on a national approach - wait for the Ministry for Primary Industries to develop a national ‘pathway’ approach for marine pests (with each region retaining the option to develop their own rules for managing marine pests).

 

The consultation (assuming approval by all participating councils) would be coordinated across the participating regions and consultation and communications approaches would be consistent as is practical allowing for regional nuances.  A summary of the approach to consultation and engagement is provided below:

·        The discussion document and supporting information would be hosted on the Bionet website (a national website for biosecurity information) and linked to each participating council’s website.

·        A feedback form would be available electronically and the feedback period would extend from 18 March to 24 May 2019.

·        Each participating council would target engagement to suit stakeholders (such as local marina operators, yacht/boat clubs and relevant marine industry), tāngata whenua and interested parties in their regions, but would use the same key messages and supporting material.  The timing enables engagement at the Hutchwilco New Zealand boat show in Auckland between 16 and 19 May 2019.

·        Broader advisory notices would be sent to other stakeholders with a likely interest (such as mooring owners).

·        Advice from the Māori Technical Advisory Group has been sought on engagement with tāngata whenua.

·        A coordinated approach would be used for ‘inter-regional’ stakeholders to avoid duplication – MPI is likely to take a strong role in this engagement. 

·        Council may wish to appoint a councillor as spokesperson for the purposes of consultation in Northland.

 

Feedback received would be reported to UNISA and partner councils mid-2019.  The feedback would inform future decisions on marine pest management and potentially, the development of an inter-regional marine pest pathway management plan under the Biosecurity Act 1993.

The project would be aligned as far as possible with the national processes to ensure it has applicability and utility across New Zealand – so similar approaches can be adopted in other regions and/or incorporated into national pathway planning by central government in the future.  The discussion document will increase community understanding of the risks associated with marine pests and the options available.  Feedback received will assist the councils to understand community views and inform future decisions on marine pest management.

The project costs can be met within the current Biosecurity budget.  It is recommended that council approve the release of the discussion document and enable staff to start the consultation process.  The same mandate is sought from each participating council with the timing of these decisions aligned as far as practicable. 

 

Considerations

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Do nothing (e.g. status quo/await national initiative).

No costs associated with consultation.

·    Uncertainty on timeframes for measures to address marine pest spread.  

·    No understanding of stakeholder/community views on the matter.

2

No discussion document – seek council approval to start the statutory process for inter-regional marine pest pathway plan.

Shorter timeframe and statutory methods have earlier effect.

·    Risk consultation does not meet requirements of the Biosecurity Act.

·    Risk of strong negative reaction from communities if not given opportunity to comment prior to formal process.

3

Release discussion document and engage/ consult the community to seek their views.

·    More confidence in management options (tested in consultation).

·    Greater stakeholder/ community understanding of issues and options (better buy-in).

·    More confidence consultation meets requirements of Biosecurity Act if statutory options pursued.

·    Costs associated with consultation (estimated at approximately $15,000-$20,000).

·    Delay in statutory process/legal effect of rules (if pursued).

·    Feedback received may identify unforeseen issues/problems or opportunities.

 

The staff’s recommended option is option three on the basis it provides greater confidence in selecting management options, better meets consultation requirements of the Biosecurity Act 1991 (in the event a statutory approach is pursued), and is likely to achieve more buy-in from tāngata whenua, stakeholders and communities.

2.      Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it does not commit significant resources or result in regulatory change.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tāngata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.   

3.      Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

Being a non-statutory consultation process, the decision to release a discussion document does not present any policy or legislative issues and is considered good practice.  For similar reasons, risks are considered to be low.

Further considerations

4.      Community views

While Northland communities have an interest in marine biosecurity, the discussion document does not result in any regulatory or financial initiatives with material effect on Northland communities.  If progressed, the discussion document would provide an opportunity for the community to express their views.

5.      Māori impact statement

While Māori have an interest in marine pest management, the release of the discussion document does not have any substantive regulatory or financial implications with material effect on Māori.  Also, if progressed, the discussion document would provide an opportunity for the community to express their views.  The proposal has also been discussed with Te Taitokerau Māori Advisory Committee Working Party and the Māori Technical Advisory Group with both indicating support for the consultation.

 

6.      Financial implications

The project can be met within existing budget.

7.      Implementation issues

Coordinating the project across four regions will present some implementation issues, however, careful project management should ensure these are managed.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Discussion document DRAFT 30 January 2019  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Bruce Howse

Title:

Group Manager - Environmental Services

Date:

12 February 2019

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.7

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 7.1

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Chair's Report to Council

ID:

A1156744

From:

Bill Shepherd, Chairman

 

Purpose of Report

This report is to receive information from the Chair on strategic issues, meetings/events attended, and correspondence sent for the months of December 2018 and January 2019.

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Chair's Report to Council’ by Bill Shepherd, Chairman and dated 31 January 2019, be received.

 

Strategic issues

Upper North Island Supply Chain Strategy

Government is currently conducting a review of transport logistics for the Upper North Island.  The review is defined on the Ministry of Transport’s website which says that:

 “Government is conducting a comprehensive Upper North Island logistics and freight review to ensure New Zealand’s supply chain is fit for purpose in the longer-term.

The review will guide the development and delivery of a freight and logistics strategy for the Upper North Island.  This includes a feasibility study to explore moving the location of the Ports of Auckland, with serious consideration to be given to Northport.”

Our council has been invited to participate in the review and to that end, Chief Executive Malcolm Nicolson, Councillor John Bain as Chair of the Northland Regional Transport Committee, and I met with the Working Party just before Christmas to present our views.

The Working Party questioned us as to why Ports of Auckland and Port of Tauranga have grown significantly more than Northport in recent years.  Clearly this is partly because of the geographic location of Northport, but more importantly because successive governments have not invested in the onshore transport infrastructure of road and rail that is necessary for Northport to play a greater part in the economy of the Upper North Island.

It is very clear that Northport has capacity that can be part of the solution to Auckland city’s expansion needs, but it will need significant investment in onshore transport infrastructure of road and rail from central government.

Relationship Agreement

The Northland Regional Council, the Far North District Council, and the Kaipara District Council, all signed an historic relationship agreement with Te Kahu o Taonui (which is the Northland Iwi Leaders Forum and similar to the Northland Mayoral Forum), at Waitangi on 31 January 2019.

This Agreement formalises the willingness of iwi leaders and local government leaders of Taitokerau at a governance level, to work together and collaborate on issues of mutual interest and/or benefit.  It does not confer special privileges on to any one party, it builds on the governance structures that already exist.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first relationship agreement to have been made in New Zealand between multiple iwi and multiple councils.

At this stage two iwi and the Whangarei District Council have chosen not to join the Agreement.  However, the door is open for any of those organisations to join at a later stage if they so desire.

Meetings/events attended

During this period, I attended the following meetings/events/functions:

·        Meetings attended with the council’s CEO, Malcolm Nicolson:

o   Brent Wilson, Leigh Hopper, and Felix Richter – fanworm in Whangārei Harbour.  Councillor David Sinclair also attended.

o   Northland Inc. Limited – Annual General Meeting.  Councillor David Sinclair also attended.

o   Sir John Goulter and Jon Moore, Northport – methyl bromide.  Group Manager – Regulatory Services, Colin Dall, also attended.

o   Addressed the Upper North Island Supply Chain Strategy Study Group.  Councillor John Bain also attended.

o   Chris Saxby, Babcock International – progress project on move to Whangārei.  David Wilson and Vaughan Cooper from Northland Inc. also attended.

o   Northland Mayoral Forum held at Far North District Council.

o   Northland Mayors, Chair and CEOs – NZTA announcement on four laning.

o   Signing of the Council Governance Relationship Agreement and dinner with the National Iwi Chairs Forum at Waitangi.

·        Kristen Edge, Northern Advocate – four lane highway.

·        Regular Northland Mayoral Forum conference calls.

·        Enviroschools Green-Gold celebration at Comrie Park Kindergarten.  Environmental Education Officer, Susan Karels, also attended.

·        Kawakawa Hundertwasser Christmas celebration.

·        Craig Fenton, Operations Manager, Google UK – speaking about ‘Okay Google what’s next’.

·        Mayor Sheryl Mai – Hundertwasser Whangārei.

·        GoodGround Christmas celebration.

·        Luke Beehre and Vaughan Cooper, Northland Inc. – Extension 350 update.  Councillor Penny Smart also attended.

Correspondence

During December 2018 and January 2019 I sent out the following correspondence:

Date

Addressed To

Subject

11.12.18

Jim Kilpatrick

Chair

Ngunguru Sandspit Protection Society Inc.

Ngunguru Sandspit

14.12.18

Fergus Gammie

Chief Executive

New Zealand Transport Agency

Thank you letter for the work carried out in Northland

19.12.18

Sarah Petersen, Chair

David Wilson, Chief Executive Officer

Northland Inc.

Northland Inc. Ltd Statement of Intent 2019-2022 – letter of expectations

21.01.19

Mayors

Whangārei District Council

Kaipara District Council

Far North District Council

Invitation to attend session with Dame Diane Robertson, Chair, Data Futures Partnership, on governance responsibilities of data management

22.01.19

Ngaire Tyson

Kiwi Coast Coordinator

Kiwi Coast Trust

Congratulatory letter on Kiwi Coast’s achievement as a finalist for the New Zealander of the Year Award

25.01.19

Executive Officer

Nature Heritage Fund

Northland Regional Council’s support to community efforts to protect Ngunguru Sandspit and Whakareora Maunga

30.01.19

Hon Phil Twyford

Minister of Transport

New road infrastructure in Northland

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 7.2

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Chief Executive’s Report to Council

ID:

A1156933

From:

Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Chief Executive’s Report to Council’ by Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer and dated 29 January 2019, be received.

 

7.2.1 Highlights

Signing of historic relationship agreement

Council’s Chairman and CEO attended the National Iwi Chairs Forum at Waitangi on Thursday 31 January, where the Mayoral Forum and Taitokerau Iwi Chairs Forum (Te Kahu O Taonui) signed an historic governance to governance Relationship Agreement.

Best Trade Exhibit

This year council won the Best Trade Exhibit at the Whangārei A&P show, and attributed this to its combined partner effort that creating linkages between biosecurity pest animals and adjacent site partners Pukenui Forest Trust and Kiwi Coast.

Sustainable Hill Country and Regional Priorities Programme

Northland was notified late December 2018 that the proposed “Sustainable Hill Country and Regional Priorities” ( SHARP) programme funded through the Hill Country Erosion Fund (2019-2023) (a subset of the PGF and One Billion Trees programme ) has been approved, in principle, subject to contracts being finalised.  The $3.6 M of funding, over 4 years, will allow the hiring of 4FTE, provision of advisory services for soil conservation and afforestation, grant funding for planting and fencing and research funds for coastal vegetative buffers and managing ageing poplars and willows in the landscape.  The SHARP programme will enable Northland to progress our Long Term Soil Conservation Plan, over and above the Long Term Plan and consolidate NRC’s land management advisory, soil conservation nursery, Environment Fund, Farm Environment Plans and One Billion Trees workstreams around one programme. 

Kiwi Coast finalist for New Zealander of the Year

The Kiwi Coast Trust is a finalist in the Kiwi Bank New Zealander of the Year Awards.  Kiwi Coast has been nominated for the Mitre 10 New Zealand Community of the Year category with the winners to be announced at the New Zealander of the Year Awards Gala in Auckland on February 13.  Read more about the awards here: https://nzawards.org.nz/news/2019-new-zealander-year-awards-finalists-confirmed/

 

7.2.2 CEO’s Office

Shared services

Nine shared services/collaborations are now business as usual, complete or at operational stage:

·    Active Recreation and Sports Facilities (NRC rate funding)

·    Joint Procurement/Contracts

·    One Calendar

·    Whanaketia te Whenua

·    Contact Centre – KDC and FNDC

·    Northland One Voice Collaboration

·    Northland Transportation Alliance

·    Civil Defence

·    Health and Safety.

Focus remains on Northland councils working together on applications for the Provincial Growth Fund a part of the Northland Forward Together’s ‘One Voice’ advocacy program. The four councils’ other priorities also include four waters, IT services, and LIDAR (survey restarted in December with Mainland Air).

Regional Economic Development has been an addition to the Shared Services program following CEOs workshop in January 2019. Three potential business model concepts are to be progressed with a recommendation on a preferred business model, funding and benefits targeted to go to Mayors then councils August/September 2019. 

Council property update

An offer by way of a Sale & Purchase Agreement to purchase a Waipapa property is currently before the vendor.

Redevelopment at 8 Kensington Avenue:  the resource consent application has been submitted. There is significant interest from prospective tenants. All consultants have been engaged. Detailed design has begun.

Kaipara Service Centre:  HB Architecture and Griffiths & Associates have been contracted as Architect and Project Manager respectively. Consultant engagement has commenced. Engagement with KDC on detailed design has begun.

Preparation for the Autumn 2019 Mt Tiger Forest harvest is well underway.

In response to the LTP, Water Street Office’s renovations Stage 1 complete. Stage 2 currently on hold.

Current Legal Proceedings

Department

Description

Status

Consent decision appeal

To construct a boardwalk as part of a coastal walkway in Back Bay, Mangawhai Estuary

No further progress to report.  Mediation adjourned until 30 June 2019.

Consent decision appeal

Seventeen groundwater takes for horticultural irrigation at Houhora, Motutangi, and Waiharara

The Court hearing closed on Friday 14 December 2018.  The Court undertook a site visit on 21 January 2019 and the council is awaiting its decision on the applications.

Consent decision appeal

Proposed deepening and realignment of Whangārei Harbour entrance and approaches

Appeal resolved via consent order issued 14 December 2018.

Consent decision appeal

Replacement consents for, and new consents for an expansion of, Doug’s Ōpua Boat Yard in Walls Bay, Ōpua.

Appeal of the decision lodged with the Environment Court on 27 November 2018.  Judicial teleconference held 22 January 2019.

The Appellant made a partial withdrawal of the parts of the appeal relating to coastal structures and dredging (new activities) on 31 January 2019.  The remaining matters subject to the appeal are the existing discharges associated with the boat yard that are continuing under section 124 of the Act.  A Court hearing has been set down for the weeks of 8 or 15 April 2019.

An objection to costs of processing the application was received on 10 December 2018.

Consents and notification decisions judicial review

Peat/kauri gum and resin extraction operation

The judicial review proceedings were withdrawn following surrender of the consents by the Consent Holder.  One of the plaintiffs (Forest and Bird) has applied for costs from the council, which the council is opposing.  The application is currently before the High Court for determination.

 

7.2.3 Corporate Excellence

Fraud Declaration

I am not aware of any fraud nor am I investigating any incidence or suspected incidence of fraud at this time.

Information Technology

The following provides an update to the presentation made at the Council workshop in November, with further investigation occurring in these areas.

Auckland Council - Discussions have continued with Auckland Council to gain a better understanding of the opportunity to leverage their systems as a shared service, with the focus around costs and the value proposition of a shared service.

Waikato Regional Council – Waikato have prepared a comprehensive business case including the recommendation of a preferred supplier. Once approved, our council can review the decision and determine the level of alignment and syndicated procurement opportunities.

Our council – workshops were completed to capture and model the intended business benefits that will come from a transformation project such as this. The process utilises a quality framework that facilitates the capture of the proposed improvement and associated business metrics.

All of these elements will assist with the preparation of the high-level business case and evaluation of options.

An update back to council is scheduled for early March.

 

7.2.4 Regulatory Services

Consents in Process

During December 2018 and January 2019, a total of 96 Decisions were issued.  These decisions comprised:

December 2018 (38)

January 2019 (58)

0

Moorings

2

Moorings

13

Coastal Permits

14

Coastal Permits

0

Air Discharge Permits

1

Air Discharge Permits

11

Land Discharge Permits

7

Land Discharge Permits

1

Water Discharge Permits

0

Water Discharge Permits

10

Land Use Consents

26

Land Use Consents

2

Water Permits

1

Water Permits

1

Bore Consents

7

Bore Consents

 

The processing timeframes for the December 2018 consents ranged from:

·    59 to 10 calendar days, with the median time being 29 days;

·    38 to 6 working days, with the median time being 20 days.

 

The processing timeframes for the January 2019 consents ranged from:

·    278 to 8 calendar days, with the median time being 48 days;

·    179 to 5 working days, with the median time being 18 days.

 

34

Applications were received in December 2018.

23

Applications were received in January 2019.

 

Of the 99 applications in progress at the end of January 2019:

 

29

were received more than 12 months ago (most awaiting further information);

20

were received between 6 and 12 months ago (most awaiting further information);

50

less than 6 months.

Appointment of Hearing Commissioners

The following commissioner was appointed in January 2019 for one consent hearing:

·    Dr Robert Lieffering for consents associated with a new marina at Port Road, Whangārei.  The hearing is scheduled for 29 March 2019.

Consents Decisions and Progress on Notified Applications in Process, Objections and Appeals

The current level of notified application processing activities at the end of January 2019 is (by number):

·    Applications Publicly/Limited Notified During Previous Month

0

·    Progress on Applications Previously Notified

5

·    Hearings and Decisions

0

·    Appeals/Objections

4

 

Compliance monitoring

The results of compliance monitoring for the period 24 November 2018 – 31 January 2019 (and year-to-date figures) are summarised in the following table and discussed below.

Classification

Total

Full compliance

Non-compliance

Significant non-compliance

Not exercised during period

Air discharges

35

23

6

5

1

Coastal permit

68

45

19

2

2

Discharge permit

150

104

32

11

3

FDE – Discharge permit

67

1

2

1

63

FDE – Permitted activity

3

2

0

1

0

Land use consent

37

35

1

0

1

Water permit

232

211

16

0

5

Total

592

421

76

20

75

Percentage

71.7%

12.8%

3.4%

12.7%

YTD

4827

3836

543

216

232

Percentage

79.4%

11.2%

4.5%

4.8%

Coastal

The majority of consents monitored during the reporting period related to coastal discharges (treated municipal sewage) and coastal structures. 

Monitoring of the dredging at Marsden Point was undertaken on a number of occasions due to non-compliance relating to water clarity. The method of dredging (trailing suction hopper dredge) had not been used in Northland before, and while an efficient method of dredging, results indicated it resulted in more disturbance than previously used dredging methods at Marsden Point. 

Hazardous substances

Twelve incidents involving the discharge of hazardous substances and 47 enquiries regarding contaminated land were received and responded to.

340.9kg of hazardous wastes was disposed of.

Discharge and land use monitoring

Routine compliance monitoring of discharge and land use consents continued during the period.  Council staff attended a meeting with the Far North, Kaipara and Whangarei district councils to discuss sharing of information and working together on the National Environmental Standard – Plantation Forestry (Forestry NES).

Since 1 May 2018 (when the Forestry NES came into effect), NRC has received 289 notices of activities.  The majority (about 57%) of these have been in relation to harvesting.

Notices of Activities NES–PF

Subpart 1

Afforestation

7

Subpart 3

Earthworks

92

Subpart 4

River crossings

23

Subpart 5

Forestry quarrying

3

Subpart 6

Harvesting

164

 

Total

289

 

Farm Dairy Effluent (FDE) Monitoring

FDE annual inspections commenced on 16 July 2018 and were completed prior to Christmas, with a total of 855 farms being visited by our contractor or council staff. The results for consented and permitted activity farms are tabled below and compared with those for the same period last year.

Consented FDE discharges

A total of 642 consented farms were visited. There was a marked improvement in the significant non-compliance rate for consented farms, dropping from 21% last year to 15% this year. The full compliance rate improved by the same percentage.

Full Compliance

Non-Compliance

Significant Non-Compliance

This Year

Last Year

This Year

Last Year

This Year

Last Year

387

358

158

167

97

142

60%

54%

25%

25%

15%

21%

Non-consented FDE discharges

A total of 213 non-consented farms were visited. There was a slight improvement in the significant non-compliance rate for non-consented farms (2% drop).

Full Compliance

Non-Compliance

Significant Non-Compliance

This Year

Last Year

This Year

Last Year

This Year

Last Year

138

162

30

17

45

52

65%

70%

14%

7%

21%

23%

The overall significant non-compliance for all farms was 16.6%.  This is an improvement of 5% compared with last year. It is obviously pleasing that the compliance rate has moved in a positive direction this year.

Environmental incidents

A total of 223 environmental incidents were received during the reporting period. Regardless of the dry conditions and fire restrictions imposed for the region by Fire and Emergency Services, 53 of these related to burning and smoke nuisance. There were no incidents recorded during the reporting period which resulted in a significant environmental impact.

January recorded the second highest number of incidents reported to council since records began in 1994 (122 as compared with 124 in February 2007).

Enforcement

Abatement notices, infringement notices and formal warnings

The following enforcement actions were taken during the period:

 

Infringement Notice

Abatement Notice

Total

Nature of Offence

No. Offences

No. Notices

No. Offences

No.  Notices

No.  Offences

No. Notices

Boat maintenance

1

1

1

1

1

2

Burning & smoke nuisance

0

0

14

14

14

15

Discharge to land

1

1

1

1

2

2

Farm dairy effluent

7

15

8

8

10

23

Illegal activity in CMA

0

0

4

4

5

5

Other air discharge

0

0

1

1

1

1

Other water discharge

1

1

1

1

1

2

Sediment

0

0

1

2

1

2

Sewage

1

1

1

1

2

2

Total

11

19

32

33

37

54

 

Other Enforcement

Dumping and burning of demolition waste, Kaikohe

Charges have been laid against two companies and one individual (associated with one of the companies) and a land owner for the dumping and burning of demolition waste near Kaikohe. One of the companies entered guilty pleas on 14 November 2018. The other company and the land owner have elected jury trial. The landowner has requested a sentence indication hearing. There were Case Review Hearings held on 12 and 17 December 2018.  A call over date has been allocated for 28 February 2019.

Enforcement Order – Paihia Wastewater Treatment Plant

The Far North District Council (FNDC) was provided with draft enforcement orders and staff affidavits relating to the Paihia Wastewater Treatment Plant for consideration/response. Following the FNDC’s response changes were made to the enforcement orders, which were then lodged with the Environment Court. It is the NRC’s preference that we get an enforcement order by consent and this is currently being worked through with the FNDC.

Hydrology

It was an exceptionally dry start to the 2019 year. Over half of the region’s rainfall stations recorded totals of less than 10mm for the month, with the driest areas in the north and east coasts. The lowest, as yet unconfirmed, rainfall for the month was Ōruru with zero, 4mm at Cape Rēinga, 3.5mm at Kerikeri, 5mm at Ōpua and Ōākura,  6.5mm at Glenbervie (the lowest January rainfall recorded since 1947), and 1.5mm at Marsden Point.  About 75% of Northland received less than 20% of normal January rainfall. 

More information will be provided in the climate reports available on the NRC website ,    see below for the regional rainfall map

Low flow gauging project work has been carried out in Whangārei Harbour tributaries. This is to be carried out multiple times over low flows, with the aim of using the data to calibrate a MALF model. We will aim to get these measurements at least once more over the summer period.

Low flow gaugings have regularly been carried out at stations used for compliance purposes. Some compliance gaugings at consent holder water takes have been carried out in the Kerikeri and Kaihū catchments.

Some equipment at the Awanui At School Cut river recorder have been shifted upstream to make way for the river works currently under way. The equipment will be moved back to its original position soon after the completion of the river benching work.

A continuous dissolved oxygen/water temp sensor has been installed at the river recorder, Mangere at Knights road. This is the second of five sensors to be installed.

IRIS270 data loggers have been tested and installed at two stations (Tarawhataroa at Redan Road and Mangere at Knights Rd). These will be used at the remainder of our GPRS sites (around 45) over this financial year and the next.  

The Waitangi at McDonald Road rainfall recorder has been switched to radio communications to decrease communications outages.

Natural Resources Science

Envirolink

Bill Dyck, Envirolink National Coordinator will be visiting us at the end of February.

NRC managed to get seven Envirolink grants this year for a total of $130K. Projects topics are listed below:

·    Drivers of periphyton biomass in Northland streams

·    Developing a Fish IBI for Northland

·    Dune lake galaxid aging using otolith growth rings – training advice package

·    Meteorological drought localisation for Eastern region

·    Real-time radar rainfall estimation and correction for Northland

·    Review of 1080 recent science

·    Application to introduce two biological control agents for the weed Sydney golden wattle

SWIM SIG convener

Jean-Charles Perquin to be taking over from Tim Davie (ECan) as the Surface Water Integrated Management (SWIM) SIG convener. Handover is estimated to be by the end of 2019.

Natural Resources Science projects - Water quantity


NRC is working on securing a site to deploy a temporal vertical pointing radar that will operate for one month as part of the real-time radar rainfall estimation project. Below is an image of the radar that the University of Auckland developed, this unit will be deployed in the autumn period.


 

Coastal

·    A surveillance camera and local volunteers have been used to monitor nuisance algae (seaweed) at Waipū Cove. The observations will be matched to weather patterns to help predict future incidents of nuisance algae.

·    Coastal water quality buoys have been deployed in the Hātea River and Waitangi Estuary.  These buoys will be deployed for one month and record water quality parameters every 15 minutes.  The results can be viewed by the public in real-time on the NRC website. www.nrc.govt.nz/buoydata.

Freshwater quality/Freshwater ecology

·    Seven additional water quality monitoring sites in the Northern Wairoa catchment will be established through the Northern Wairoa FIF project. Four of these sites will fill in gaps in our existing SOE monitoring network in the lower catchment. The remainder will be used to monitor effectiveness of targeted mitigation measures.

·    A review of the first three years of periphyton monitoring data has been commissioned to NIWA; to be completed by June 2019. This work will be essential in informing a proposed plan change in 2021.  Critical to this is understanding the role of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) in driving periphyton growth and ultimately deriving appropriate in-stream nutrient concentrations and limits/criteria for Northland rivers.

·    Victoria University has been contracted to develop an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for fish communities specific to Northland utilising data from the NIWA NZFFD and relevant models. The Fish IBI developed for Northland will provide an assessment of the state of regional fish communities.

·    Targeted monitoring of low flows will be undertaken in the Kerikeri River catchment to inform the impacts of low flows on ecosystem health.

Water allocation

A workshop on NRC’s Water Allocation Calculator was held on the 24 January 2019 with Bay of Plenty Regional Council Staff (BoP).  BoP are considering using the tool to meet their water quantity accounting requirements.

Air quality

·    Ambient PM10 monitoring results for November and December 2018 for the Whangārei and Marsden Point airsheds, and Kaikohe, showed that compliance was met with the National Environmental Standards for Air Quality (NESAQ).  PM2.5 monitoring results for Whangārei were within the Ambient Air Quality Guideline value.

·    Unsealed Road PM10 monitoring started in early December 2018 with some difficulties due to instrument failure.  A technician is due to visit Whāngarei in early February to repair the instrument.

·    A project was initiated to calculate NRC CO2 emissions. The first results show that NRC produced 859.88 tCO2-e (including buses, air travel, electricity, cars, boats, waste generation, air conditioning and refrigerator) for the financial year 2017-18.

Natural Resources Data

·    NRC attended the Environmental Data Workshop on 21 January 2019. The workshop focused on the environmental data management needs of the different councils rather than the solution.  Non-functional and functional requirements (i.e. QC, security, provenance, accessibility, usability, interoperability, supportable platform, types of data, interfaces, outputs). The project is supported by ReCoCo.

·    Survey 123: NRC attended a workshop session at ECan in Christchurch on Survey 123 for environmental data collection. The Data team will be creating electronic data capture forms and testing in the field in February and March 2019.  The GIS team is supportive of the project.  Survey123 proof of concept will be tested by the Natural Resources Team

·    Ki Eco: NRC attended a workshop session at Auckland Council on the biological database to provide direction with commissioning the system at NRC over the next six months

·    Quality System: working on options to restructure the field monitoring manual to better reflect the responsibilities/tasks of the different teams.

·    Water use records: The online submission system is currently being tested by several consent holders until the end of February 2019.

 

7.2.5 Environmental Services

LAND MANAGEMENT

Environment Fund Update

28 Environment Fund projects have been completed and signed off to date for this financial year totalling $126,180.

Farm Environment Plans (FEP) – 2018/19

This financial year 91 FEP’s have been commenced and 69 have been completed.  We anticipate approximately 150 plans will be undertaken during the year, surpassing the LTP KPI of 25,000 ha.

One Billion Trees Programme  Update

The Hill Country Erosion Fund boost year (June 2018-June 2019) team have been making good progress commissioning Northland consultants and afforestation experts , developing best practice afforestation guides and forming partnerships to enable Northland to respond to the One Billion Tree Programme.  By July 2019 we are progressing the planting of 20,000 or more trees on farms for riparian planting through this funding programme.

BIODIVERSITY

FIF Dune Lakes Project

Four fencing and three water reticulation projects are now underway (Lakes Waiparera, Ngatu, Shag, Midgley’s), to be completed by the end of the financial year.

Pest fishing work began with Lake Parawanui (North Dargaville) which is the first lake targeted for rudd removal.

Ngāti Kuri, Te Aupouri and NgaiTakoto have indicated support for aquatic weed control herbicide operations for Lakes Ngakeketo South, Waiparera, Ngatu, Mini Split and Waimimiha North. Te Uri o Hau and DOC have indicated they support the plant aquaculture (phyto-remedication) work at Lake Rototuna.

Wetlands

Wetland condition monitoring is well underway.  This is the third repeat monitoring of 28 wetlands over 18 properties, that were originally monitored in 2011.  As at the end of January, 13 wetlands have been monitored.  Nine have improved overall wetland condition scores and four had stable scores.

CoastCare

Prior to Christmas two new CoastCare brochures were produced, one aimed at summer tourists to the region and the other at people driving on Northland’s beaches.  These have been provided to Ambassadors in the Whangārei and Far North districts as well as to I-sites, agencies and CoastCare groups for distribution. 

A CoastCare – Northland’s Coast and Us social media campaign is currently running to share dune protection messages and promote the work being done around the region by CoastCare volunteers.  The campaign includes a photo competition to encourage public involvement.

Check, Clean, Dry

The Check, Clean, Dry (CCD) advocacy programme is funded by the Ministry for Primary Industries to reduce the spread of freshwater pests between water-ways.  The programme includes a user survey, signage and interaction with users of fresh-water sites.

To date this summer, 115 surveys have been completed and around 700 people have been spoken to about CCD messages.  435 CCD packs containing information, detergent and spray bottles were given out to the public and relevant businesses around Northland for distribution to their clients. 

NRC CCD advocates have attended popular lakes and waterways throughout Northland including the Kai Iwi lakes (Taharoa and Waikere), Lake Ngatu, Lake Rotopokaka (Coca Cola Lake) and Lake Manuwai.  The overall engagement from surveys taken at these lakes has been good.  In addition, events including Whangārei A&P show, waka ama trials and the Kai Iwi Lakes Open Day have been attended.

BIOSECURITY

Biosecurity Threats/Incursions

Mycoplasma bovis

As of January 2019, assistance provided by NRC to the Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) response has concluded.  Council’s involvement with the response began in March 2018 through to December 2018 – with all staff costs (approximately $120,000) charged back to Asure Quality.  A new Farm Case Manager (ICP Manager), employed by Asure Quality and based in Whangārei, continues to assist Northland farmers who have controls and restrictions placed upon their properties due to the response.

During December 2018, council’s Biosecurity Incursion Management Officer completed a handover of Northland’s current existing Notices of Direction and Restricted Place Notices to the new ICP manager.  Latest updates on the M. bovis response can be found by following the link below:

https://www.mpi.govt.nz/protection-and-response/responding/alerts/mycoplasma-bovis/

Kiwi Coast – NRC Partnership

Kiwi Coast has collaborated with Department of Conservation to refresh the kiwi roadside billboards around Northland.  The first of the two new Kiwi Coast roadside billboards have been installed at Ngunguru and on SH1 near Hikurangi.  Further billboards have been requested at Russell, Mangamuka and Purerua.  The purpose is to support communities who are working hard to increase kiwi numbers with a dog control message, in a positive and eye-catching way.

Biosecurity High Value Areas (HVAs)

Council’s recently established Biosecurity High Value Areas have all established community-based working groups to help ensure outcomes and objectives that have been developed in each HVA management plan are achieved.  Each HVA working group have drafted individual terms of reference using a template previously approved by council.

Whangārei Heads High Value Area

Landowner engagement and predator trapping throughout the Whangārei Heads is ongoing and a high turnout of the public is expected at the next kiwi release which is planned for 17th February. 

Weed Action Whangārei Heads (WAWH) has continued to support community weed control projects which includes managing the “community store”, a place where locals can borrow equipment for managing weeds.  The community is supported by council staff and advice on how to control weeds will be available at the upcoming kiwi release.  Staff are also developing a community pest control plan with WAWH to address large infestations of privet around Parua Bay. 

Mangawhai – Waipū (Piroa-Brynderwyn) High Value Area

The working group for this high value area have renamed their high value area to the Piroa-Brynderwyn HVA to better reflect the focus area of the pest control work being carried out.  Piroa is the traditional name for the Brynderwyns as recognised by local iwi Patuharakeke and Te Uri o Hau which will be used to refer to this high value area.  The Piroa-Brynderwyn Landcare (PBL) group has progressed with the extension of a comprehensive predator trapping network throughout the project area.  Predator trap boxes are built by the Waipū Men’s Shed and deployed and serviced by local landowners and contractors.  Increasing numbers of landowners are requesting support and wanting to get involved in pest management.

The Piroa Brynderwyn Weed Action Committee and Weed Action Coordinator are progressing the establishment of a ‘community store’ modelled on that of the Weed Action Whangārei Heads store, where locals can access free advice, tools and herbicide.  They have three community events scheduled over the next three months and have begun developing a project plan for engaging the local community and raising awareness of the priority weeds they have identified for their area.

Mid North Bay of Islands High Value Area

Kiwi Coast Coordinator, Andrew Mentor has continued to coordinate and manage the Mid-North / Bay of Islands High Value Area alongside council staff.  Northern Regional Corrections Facility at Ngāwhā have constructed hundreds of stoat trap boxes which are now being delivered to landowners, groups and projects within the Mid North High Value Area.  These traps will help to intensify existing stoat trapping operations, fill gaps to link neighbouring projects into continuous trapping networks and kick start new projects wanting to protect local kiwi populations.

Tutukākā High Value Area


Biosecurity staff have been supporting the community in the Tutukākā HVA with kiwi monitoring work over December and January.  This included the collection of an egg from a monitored male kiwi’s nest which was under threat.  The chick hatched at the Whangārei Native Bird Recovery Centre and was released back into the Tutukākā area in January with community members in attendance.  Staff also supported the capture and transmitter change of a monitored kiwi in the Sandy Bay Area and followed up on a kiwi nest reported by a member of the public in the Matapōuri area.

Image: Kiwi chick due for release back into protected land in Tutukākā high value area

Image: Externally pipping kiwi (hatching) egg salvaged from monitored nest in Tutukākā

A sub-committee of Tutukākā Landcare representatives has been convened with a focus on weeds.  This group has great representation for the various local community ‘hubs’ and will use that model to create a network of key local contacts for the community to access weed advice, equipment and support.  They have also appointed a new coordinator who has begun developing a volunteer event kit and a prioritisation exercise to determine the ‘dirty dozen’ focus weed species, as well as a plan for raising awareness about these target species in their community.  They are at the early stages of defining this group and are yet to determine if they will use the same Weed Action branding as the Whangārei Heads and Piroa-Brynderwyns group.

Kai Iwi Lakes High Value Area

Staff have continued to liaise with landowners surrounding the lakes regarding the development of a community pest control plan.  A western-Northland based project manager has continued to build landowner relationships and encourage participation in community pest control.  Local Te Roroa contractors have delivered weed and animal pest control operations at the lakes and surrounding areas.  Wilding pine and acacia control has been ongoing with more scheduled over the coming months.

Western Northland Pest Control

Staff delivered 242 stoat trap boxes and 484 stoat traps were provided for council’s Western Northland Pest Control programmes.  These traps will be used for predator control in new established community pest control areas such as Wekaweka Landcare CPCA, and Pupurangi Nature Sanctuary CPCA as well as several others which are currently being finalised.

Russell Forest Pest Control

Following on from the Department of Conservation’s aerial 1080 operation last year in Russell Forest, staff are continuing to work with the Russell State Forrest Roopu in developing the twenty-year forest health plan.  Council has collaborated with Nga Whenua Rahui and Guardians of the Bay to fund a one-off ground operation on 3B2 Trust land to complement the aerial operation on Cape Brett.  Council is supporting Manaaki Whenua /Landcare Research’s MBIE Vision Mātauranga proposal, a project that would replicate the forest vegetation and bird survey recently undertaken in the Warawara Forest.  Ngāti Manu’s pest control team based at Kāretu have begun laying out traps and eventually bait stations in a small pilot area to train hapū members, with the long-term goal to expand throughout the Whaakaurau Valley.

Image: Ngati Manu’s pest control team based at Kāretu setting up their pilot pest control block.

Kauri Dieback

Staff are continuing to groundtruth potential kauri dieback sites identified through aerial surveillance in Northland.  Results are presented in the following table.

Kauri Dieback management plans are currently being developed for all positive sites as well as those that are identified as medium – high risk sites.  Nearly all sites council staff have inspected will receive advice and a basic management plan about how to best protect their kauri and forest from kauri dieback and other diseases.

Staff have provisionally secured additional funding of approximately $160,000 from the Kauri Dieback programme to groundtruth priority sites and fence off kauri in Northland. 

Table 1 below: Summary of samples taken

 

Number of Sites Inspected

Soil Samples Taken

Soil Sample Results

Month

Total Sites Inspected

Priority 1 Sites

Priority 2 Sites

Landowner Requested Sites

Number of Samples Taken

Positive

Undetected

Pending

October

5

0

2

3

17

6

11

0

November

11

3

3

5

38

2

32

6

December

11

8

3

0

44

 

 

44

January

15

7

3

5

40

 

 

40

YTD Total

42

18

11

13

139

8

43

90

 

Marine Biosecurity

The Hull Surveillance Programme has been running since October and is on track, with 53% of the annual target (2,000 vessels) completed as of 23 January 2019.  In December and January, surveillance was carried out at Whangārei Harbour, Bay of Islands and Whangaroa Harbour and included a total of 630 vessels checked by divers for marine invasive species.

In three instances, fanworm were found in the Bay of Islands on the bottom of keels of boats that were recently cleaned in Auckland by the same facility (and a fourth one was reported by the boatyard).  The team will work with this facility to improve their operations and ensure compliance.  Overall, we have seen a very positive change in attitude this summer, in particular from vessels from Auckland, with a much higher compliance with the Pathways Plan (69% of vessels surveyed) and support for the clean hull rule and Hull Surveillance Programme.

Results of the 18/19 Hull Surveillance Programme for December 2018 and January 2019

Number of vessels surveyed

630

Total year to date

1061

% of target for 18/19

53%

 

 

Vessels detected with fanworm (Sabella)

11

Vessels detected with Styela sea squirt

40

Vessels detected with Japanese kelp (Undaria)

0

Vessels detected with Australian droplet tunicate (Eudistoma)

11

Vessels detected with Pyura sea squirt

0

Pathways plan compliance

69% of vessels

The Ōpua Fanworm Eradication Programme continues but was delayed due to very poor visibility; divers could not successfully conduct surveys.  As soon as visibility improves, dive surveys and removal of any fanworm found will resume and be completed.  This may not happen until May when it is anticipated that visibility will improve.

A fisherman reported catching four large shrimps in a flounder net in Whangaroa on 18 January and staff confirmed them as Japanese mantis shrimp, a species not currently known from Whangaroa but is found in the harbours of the Hokianga, Kaipara harbours and also reported from Mangonui.  This aggressive, predatory shrimp is known to prey on a variety of fish, molluscs and crustaceans, however the impacts of high numbers of mantis shrimp on other fisheries such as flounder are unclear and currently there are no means of eradication once the shrimp is established.  Many Northland harbours do not have the shrimp however they can hitchhike on vessels as part of biofouling and it is important that vessel hulls are kept clean to avoid their transfer.

The Ministry for Primary Industry provided a marine pest identification workshop on 24 January, hosted at NRC.  Approximately 25 people attended including commercial divers, boatyard operators, port environmental officers, biosecurity officers, and local vessel owners.

Staff were required to attend a disputes tribunal hearing in Whangārei concerning the marine pest charge.  The applicant claimed the charge was unfair and unjust however the referee determined the claim was not within the jurisdiction of the tribunal to hear and dismissed the claim.

 

 

 

Pest Plants

Eradication and Progressive Containment plants

Staff have started the biannual inspections for Mickey Mouse plant (Ochna serrulata).  There are currently 470 active or surveillance sites throughout Northland.  Ninety-Four sites were inspected in January, with 8 new management sites added to the programme.  Two of these are within Biosecurity High Value Areas at Tutukākā and Whangārei Heads.

The annual spartina control program is also now underway with control undertaken at Kaipara management sites.  Whangaroa sites are scheduled to begin this month.

Inspections and control have also been undertaken for Senegal tea, yellow flag iris and cathedral bells.  A new cathedral bells site was found in Onerahi while conducting searches for Mickey Mouse plant.  There are now six known active eradication sites for this species in Northland.

Staff undertook control for progressive containment species pultenaea sites outside of the containment area and further initial knockdown work was undertaken by contractors at main pultenaea infestation site inside the containment area.

The summer period has also been an extremely busy time for customer requests for weed identification, advice and herbicide, with particular interest in moth plant and ragwort and tradescantia biocontrol, as well as the expected privet and wild ginger enquiries.

Manchurian Wild Rice

The first round of Manchurian wild rice spraying has commenced after delays due to unsuitable weather conditions.  Local contractors have since been able to fast track control effort and have nearly completed the first round of contracted spray hours.

Stop Wild Ginger

The inaugural bi-annual Stop Wild Ginger stakeholders meeting was held, with relatively good representation of stakeholders in attendance.  The meeting covered progress on the acquisition and testing of potential wild ginger biocontrol agents.  Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research Containment Facility Manager, Hugh Gourlay, who is overseeing the project with CABI, provided a detailed update on the project.

One agent, the stem mining fly has been successfully exported from northern India to the UK, and host testing has begun.  They are currently waiting on the emergence of the stem mining fly larvae from the host testing experiment and can expect the results in May/June. 

A second agent, the ginger weevil, is proving more difficult to collect due to a number of factors such as weather and collection site numbers.  It is expected that the weevil is to be collected and taken to the UK by October 2019.

The current target is for a release date in Northland is summer 2021.

RIVERS

River Contract Works

Priority Rivers

Work

Status

Comments

Awanui

OpEx

90% complete

Mid-Awanui stop-bank re-alignment completed some remaining spraying, mulching and minor maintenance.

Awanui

CapEx 

55% complete

Te Ahu stopbank stabilization works and grade control.

Awanui

CapEx 

75% complete

Bell’s Hill Benching.

Kaihū

OpEx

65% complete

~ 40% long-reach digger work and 50% of the Spraying.

Minor Rivers

OpEx

32% complete

Only high priority work is being progressed.

LTP Projects

Rivers

Comments

Awanui

Bell’s Hill Benching and the Te Ahu Rock Armouring projects has progressed well given the good weather in January. 
Modelling work is progressing and we expect the Preliminary Scheme design results to be delivered in March. 

Matangirau

Preliminary modelling has been completed, staff have shared the modelling results with the Matangirau community and with FNDC.  We have scoped additional modelling to refine the preferred options.   

Kawakawa – Taumārere

The Resource Consent has been lodged as “Draft” for the Turntable Hill river benching works to allow FNDC and NRC to process and identify any gaps while an Archaeology Authority lodgement with HNZ is running concurrently.  Staff have met with the affected landowners and with Iwi to get agreement for the works.

Whangārei

Detailed design for the Woods Road floodwall is finalised.  We expect the Resource Consent to be lodged mid-February and works tendered shortly thereafter.

Panguru

Preliminary Modelling has been completed and staff are scoping and refining the modelling ahead of 12 February Committee meeting and 28 February Community Meeting.

NATURAL HAZARDS

Work Streams

Status

Comments

Priority Rivers Flood Hazard Maps

95%

Staff are reviewing the Paparoa and Waipū River models and preforming final checks.  We expect the maps to be released in March.

Awanui Flood Model

75%

 

DHI has completed two model calibration runs, with only one remaining.  This is the most complex part of the modelling work.  Once the remaining calibration run is complete, DHI will start design storm runs

Regional LiDAR

26%

 

RPS has flown over Christmas and New Year and have completed approximately 26% total capture.

 


 

Northland LiDAR Capture

Northland LiDAR as of 7 February 2019

 

7.2.6 Strategy, Governance And Engagement

Proposed Regional Plan

The Hearing Panel is preparing its recommendations with the aim of presenting them to the April 2019 council meeting for approval.  The aim is also for council to make its decisions on the provisions for managing genetically modified organisms at the same council meeting.

The council decisions version of the Proposed Regional Plan will have legal effect.

Once council has released its decisions, submitters will then have the ability to appeal provisions to the Environment Court.

National Initiatives

The Productivity Commission has started an inquiry into local government funding and financing with the release of an Issues Paper on 6 November 2018. Council has lodged a submission on the paper under authority delegated to the Chairman and Chief Executive officer. The submission outlines council views on the local government funding and finance issues raised by the Commission.

Corporate Planning

The process of developing the Annual Plan 2019/20 is progressing well and is running to an earlier than usual timeframe to accommodate elections.  Community consultation is scheduled to begin on 4 March.

The second quarter of reporting on the performance measures set out in the Long Term Plan 2018-2028 is now complete.  The second quarter covers the three month period October – December 2018. 

Quarter two provides an opportunity to check in on the progress of some of the annual measures, with reporting demonstrating that annual targets are tracking well.  Targets were achieved for all but three of the measures reported on in the second quarter.  Those not achieved are shown in the table below:

LTP performance measure

Target

Q2 result

Commentary

Percentage of official information requests that are responded to within 20 working days.

100% compliance

92%

Two LGOIMA requests not responded to within 20 working days during the reporting period.

Percentage of monitored permitted farm dairy effluent activities that are not graded as significantly non-compliant.

90%

79.20%

A total of 212 permitted activity dairy farms were monitored.  Of these, 44 were significantly non-compliant.

Percentage of environmental incidents with more than minor effects reported to the Environmental Hotline that are resolved within 30 working days.

80% resolved within 30 working days

72.70%

There has been a total of 11 incidents with more than minor adverse effects.  Of these 8 were resolved within 30 working days.

District Planning

Staff attended a hearing for Whangarei District Council’s Proposed Plan Change 129 (Notable and Public Trees) in early December.  The regional council requested amendments to the plan change to allow tree works to be undertaken by Northland Regional Council staff as ‘permitted activities’, where trees have the potential to cause/exacerbate river flooding and stream bank erosion.

The Hearing Panel are currently deliberating on the plan change and will make a recommendation to Whangarei District Council in the next few months.  Staff will provide a further update when the district council releases the Council’s decision.

Economic Development

Investment and Growth Reserve – Projects report

Project

December/January update

Future developments/ reporting

Extension 350

Nothing new to report.

Resources Enterprise Limited (REL)

Discussed with business consultant on plans to reopen the sawmill.  December interest payment has not yet been paid. 

Meeting with REL directors set for 8 February.

Hundertwasser Art Centre (Whangārei)

Nothing new to report.

Second invoice due at 50% works complete.

Kawakawa Hundertwasser Park Centre (Te Hononga)

Funding agreement signed and all conditions met. First invoice received and paid ($200,000).

Stone laying ceremony 1 February 2019. Second invoice expected in April 2019.

Extended Regional Promotion

Nothing new to report.

Report for the first six months 2018/19 due in February.

Twin Coast Cycle Trail (TCCT)

Contacted FNDC who informed that one of the five outstanding easements have been finalised. 

Awaiting further progress report on remaining four easements to complete funding commitment.  Maybe Q4.

Other activities

·   Issue 22 of the Northland Economic Quarterly published on 11 December (www.nrc.govt.nz/economicquarterly). The annual section looks at some key primary sector results for the 2017/18 season while the spotlight section focuses on the latest business demography statistics for Northland. 

·   Internet Speed Survey 2018/19 launched 11 December and closed 1 February.  The Digital Enablement Group (comprising the four Northland councils and Northland Inc) ran the internet speed survey to gather information that will assist us in our work with central government to expand and improve broadband coverage in Northland. 376 completed surveys were received.

·   Letter of Expectations for the Statement of Intent 20019-2022 sent to Northland Inc.

·   Second meeting held with NZTA, consultants, NInc and district council on developing walking and cycling business cases using funding awarded through the PGF.

Online Channels Highlights

·    Most popular post on Facebook for December – Internet speed test survey promotion. The post reached over 14,000 people.

·    Most popular post on Facebook for January – Call for our community to keep an eye out for pest plants in flower right now like the Cathedral Bells pest plant. The post reached over 7,000 people.

Key Performance Indicators

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

Dec-18

Jan-19

WEB

 

 

 

 

 

# Visits to the NRC website

13,000

14,800

14,700

16,100

18,400

E-payments made

25

11

6

2

4

# subscription customers (cumulative)

1,169

1,154

1,153

1,159

1,167

SOCIAL MEDIA (cumulative)

 

 

 

 

 

# Twitter followers

1,405

1,415

1,413

1,418

1,416

# NRC Facebook fans

6,623

6,910

7,132

7,198

7,611

# NRC Overall Facebook Reach

203,600

137,800

137,200

70,275

87,800

# CDEM Facebook fans

16,000

No data

16,200

16,400

16,500

# CDEM Overall Facebook Reach

59,100

No data

47,200

59,299

14,800

# Instagram followers

540

596

615

646

663

* November data is for a 25-day period due to early reporting deadlines.

Enviroschools / Education

Enviroschools Reflections

Date

School / Kindergarten

Stage

4 December

Sharing and decision-making session

 

14 December

Celebration with Chairman Bill Shepherd

Comrie Park Kindergarten (Matarau)

Green-Gold

5 December

Celebration with Cr Joce Yeoman

 

Bay of Islands International Academy
(Te Tī)

Silver

11 December

Sharing and decision-making session

 

18 December

Celebration with Cr John Bain

 

Whangaruru School

Silver

12 December

Celebration with Cr Joce Yeoman

Whananaki School

Bronze

On 3 December, Otaika Valley School reported to the Whangārei Harbour Catchment Group on their work in and around the Otaika River.

 

School communities facilitated

Despite the school holidays, 21 school communities were visited by Enviroschools facilitators during December and January.

Marketing and Engagement

Whangārei A&P Show (1 December 2018)

Our display focused on biosecurity pest animals and pest plants, hygiene and the conclusion of the Where’s your Wai freshwater consultation. Our focus on partnerships influenced site set up this year, creating linkages between biosecurity pest animals and adjacent site partners Pukenui Forest Trust and Kiwi Coast. The partnership was an efficient way of maximising the messages to this audience. Pest plants also focused on joint messages with Pukenui and provided advice on predominantly urban control species. The hygiene display covered Kauri Dieback, Check, Clean, Dry and information was also available on Mycoplasma bovis given the current interest regarding this concern in Northland.

It was felt, however, that the show was not as well attended as in previous years. Approximately 200 people interacted with council’s site. The rainy morning would have contributed to this, but feedback will be given to the A&P Society.

Bay Bush Action-Paihia Green (15 December 2018)

Biosecurity team attended an event co-ordinated by Bay Bush Action on the Paihia Green. Although the event was poorly publicised the two staff attending felt it was a worthwhile event and that there was benefit in supporting the work being done in this area.

Kai Iwi Lakes Open Day (26 January 2019)

Council continued its usual presence at this event with information on wetlands, dune lakes animal pests and weeds.  A check, clean, dry station also showed people the methods to ensure freshwater pests are not spread between waterways via the gear used in water activities.

Ngati Hau Festival – Akerama marae (26 January 2019)

This event was trialled as a new opportunity to engage with Māori.  Unfortunately, attendance at this new event was marginal and engagement with the two council staff representing biosecurity pest animals was not significant.

Māori Engagement

At its November meeting, the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhē Board resolved to erect safe swimming signage at four sites along Te Oneroa-a-Tōhē/90 Mile Beach, and develop collateral to be distributed via the i-site centre Kaitāia as part of a summer campaign to raise awareness of the Board and its purpose. Signs were erected at Ahipara, Hukatere and Te Paki and the summer collateral provided to Te Ahu i-site centre for distributing to summer visitors.

The Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) by-monthly regional marae based hui was held at Takahiwai Marae, hosted by Patuharakeke Te Iwi Trust.

Staff continue to work with Auckland Council and Kaipara Uri on drafting advice around a mitigation proposal associated with the Kaipara Harbour for central government consideration.

During January, Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua welcomed Alan Riwaka as their new Chief Executive. Councillors Dimery and Smart attending the pōwhiri for Mr Riwaka supported by the Chief Executive and staff. 

 

 

 

Governance Support

Local government official information (LGOIMA) requests

Month

LGOIMA requests received 2017/18

LGOIMA requests received 2018/19

July

7

15

August

10

20

September

16

7

October

15

5

November

12

10

December

14

9

January

12

11

February

14

 

March

12

 

April 

14

 

May

15

 

June

18

 

 

 

 

Total LGOIMA requests received

159

77

Total LGOIMA requests not responded to ≤ 20 working days*

15

0

 

Details on the requests not completed within 20 working days:

REQ.592230 – Request for bullying and harassment claims.  This was not completed within 20 working days due to the need to seek legal advice.

REQ.592349 – Request for informatin on farm cattle consents.  This was not completed within 20 working days because of a misunderstanding of the LGOIMA definition of working days.

 

7.2.7 Customer Service – Community Resilience

CUSTOMER SERVICE

Telephone Inbound Call Statistics

 

December 2018

January 2019

Target

Call volume

1848

2334

 

Conversion rate

97.0%

95.3%

>95%

Average wait time

7 sec

8 sec

 

Calls answered in under 30sec

94%

91.8%

>90%

The dip in performance in January is attributed to staff being on leave requiring Customer Services Officers to make multiple calls to locate suitable staff for referrals.

Telephone Performance

Although most post-installation issues have been resolved, there are still intermittent call quality issues and instances of calls not ringing internal numbers.  Northcloud are responsive to issues and are meeting regularly with NRC to resolve these issues.  A follow up staff survey is planned to identify any remaining problems and opportunities for improvement.

 

Satisfaction Monitoring

Feedback Cards, Compliments and Complaints

Some departments are including an online feedback link.  Feedback from this source and from feedback cards has been included with compliments and complaints.

Compliments received December and January

Total

Overall Service

             Biodiversity

             Civil Defence

             Consents

             Records

6

1

1

3

1

Service provided by a specific person

             Mike Knight, Biosecurity

             Diane Lawrence, Biosecurity & Customer Services

             Paula Munn, Customer Services

4

1

2

1

The two compliments received on behalf of Diane both related to her advice on pest control.  Mike’s compliment related to his practical advice and offers of further assistance at Trefoil Park.  Paula’s was an acknowledgement of her warm and friendly welcome.

Complaints received December and January

Total

Standard of service provided

             Consents via web form with no additional detail

             Armourguard inaction on hotline complaint

             Fish died after salvinia removed from pond by NRC

             Drinking water testing

             Felled wilding pines not cleared up

             Miscommunication and runaround over abandoned car

             Gold card holder dissatisfied

8

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

Disagree with decision or process

             Inaction over neighbours use of Roundup

             Objected to display of taxidermied animals

2

1

1

Lack of information or communication

          Delay in information because address not checked

             Lack of detail on invoice

             Delay in receiving application information

3

1

1

1

All non-anonymous complaints have been managed and responded to by their department and/or the Customer Services Manager.  The web form has been amended to encourage dissatisfied customers to include their contact details.


 

Regional Customer Service Centres (CSC)

Other Activity

By creating a virtual call centre, the new phone system has increased Customer Service’s capacity to answer incoming calls relieving pressure for the officers to refer calls quickly.   The officers now spend more time with callers ensuring they get through to a subject expert rather than voice mail.  An on-line knowledge base is being developed to ensure more enquiries can be satisfied at first point of contact without the need for referral.

CIVIL DEFENCE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Warnings and activations

No weather watches or warnings have been issued during December or January for the Northland region.  A National Warning System test message was carried out by the Ministry on 29 January.  Response to the test was carried out in accordance with group operating procedures.  

Emergency Management System Reform

The Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management (MCDEM) is working to implement many of the recommendations made in the Government’s response to the Technical Advisory Group Report on the Ministerial Review on better responses to natural disasters and other emergencies.  Many of the recommendations relate directly to CDEM Groups.

This work includes the Ministry working towards the establishment of “Fly in Teams,” (NZFIT) which is effectively surge capacity and capability to support groups at the local and regional level during an emergency.  A draft concept paper on the design and implementation of NZFIT was circulated to groups prior to Christmas 2018.

The Northland CDEM Group has now provided comments on the proposal.  It is apparent that the Ministry is working to a very tight timeframe to put in place the arrangements and personnel.  This time pressure seems to have impacted the consultation and development outcomes.  The Group comments relate to the limited consultation and input to the design, team name, deployment process and funding arrangements, the proposed reporting lines and governance.  The target date for having the NZFIT up and running is 30 June 2019. 

The Ministry recently released details outlining the new Response and Recovery Leadership Capability Development Programme.  (Previously referred to as Controllers and Recovery managers professional development programmes).  A contract has been signed with Massey University on behalf of the Response and Recovery Aotearoa (RRANZ) consortium in December and a draft programme outline has subsequently been developed, consisting of an on-line component and two face-to-face Tiers:  Tier 1 focussing on common capabilities for response and recovery, and Tier 2 focussing more on the response and recovery leadership capabilities. 

Significant costs are associated with this programme and matters such as prior learning and current levels of capability are yet to be resolved.

Iwi engagement

The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet assisted by Te Puni Kōkori, has been asked to engage with iwi and CDEM Groups to explore how best to involve iwi in governance/management of Civil Defence and to better recognise the role of marae in a response capacity.  This work is underway, including consideration of support that may be needed to support the work of groups/iwi/marae.

Emergency Response Software

The Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management are progressing with development of an Office365 solution to replace the Emergency Management Information System (EMIS).  A Project Reference Group is being established as part of the build.  The project is expected to be completed by July 2019.

Council shared services

A presentation was made by CDEM Group office personnel to the Mayoral Forum in mid-December and a follow up presentation has also been made to Whangarei District councillors.  The presentation focused mainly on shared services, work programmes and the changes to the on-call arrangements.

The work program for each of the three councils have been agreed for the coming year. 

TRANSPORT

Regional Land Transport Planning

The Local Government sponsored Transport Special Interest Group (TSIG) is presently looking into the New Zealand Transport Agencies (NZTA) policies and procedures relating to the compilation of Regional Land Transport Plans (RLTP).   The present process is onerous, time consuming and does not align with local governments Long Term Plans.

The TSIG does not consider that enough emphasis is placed on the importance of the RLTP’s, particularly during the compilation of National Land Transport Plans and the subsequent allocation of funds.

PASSENGER TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATION

Total Mobility      

Total Mobility (TM) figures are reported on one month in arrears, as the required information is unavailable at the time of the agenda deadline.

 

Total clients

Monthly

Actual

Expend

Monthly Budget Expend

Variance

Year/Date

Actual Expend

Year/Date

Budgeted Expend

Variance

November

1423

$19,587

$25,000

-$5,413

$89,843

$125,000

$35,157

December

1425

$16,215

$25,000

-$8,785

$106,058

$150,000

$43,942

On 7 December, Northland Regional Council staff attended the International Day of People with Disabilities event held in Whangārei, the event was widely advertised and was well attended.  Staff took the opportunity to fully promote the TM Scheme.

Total Mobility Awareness campaign   

The Transport team is working with the Communications team on creating more awareness around Total Mobility, through radio advertising, posters for doctor surgeries and rest homes, and incorporating a social media campaign.  

Contracted Bus Services   

Due to information for this report being required prior to the month end, complete statistics are not available.  Therefore, the information included below is one month in arrears.

* Please Note - Cash fares were lowered to $2 Adult and $1 Child for the month under review.  This reduction in fares was to offset any passenger related problems with the closure of the Snapper system and the introduction of the new INIT interim cash fare only system.  This reduction in fares is expected to continue to about March 2019 when the INIT system becomes fully online (activation of card-based fares).

Operational Statistics

December 2018

 

(revenue ex GST)

 

Actual

Budget

Variance

Year/Date

Actual  

Year/Date

Budgeted 

City Link Passengers

29192

22353

6839

161975

158805

City Link Revenue

*$29,689*

$45,130

*- $15,441

$258,188

$315,272

Mid North Link Passengers

157

402

-245

1153

2496

Mid North Link Revenue

$545

$2,660

-$2,115

$3,311

$15,714

Hokianga Link Passengers

26

42

-16

159

174

Hokianga Link Revenue

$229

$313

-$84

$1,674

$2,268

Far North Link Passengers

461

501

-40

3486

3827

Far North Link Revenue

$1,126

$1,253

-$127

$7,916

$9,568

Operational Statistics

November 2018

(revenue ex GST)

Actual

Budget

Variance

Year/Date

Actual  

Year/Date

Budgeted 

City Link Passengers

30315

27930

2385

132783

136452

City Link Revenue

$40,327

$56,644

-$16,318

$228,499

$270,142

Mid North Link Passengers

219

414

-195

996

2094

Mid North Link Revenue

$808

$2,699

-$1,891

$3,676

$ 13,053

Hokianga Link Passengers

35

30

5

133

132

Hokianga Link Revenue

$397

$391

$6

$1,445

$1,721

Far North Link Passengers

668

667

1

3025

3326

Far North Link Revenue

$1,650

$1,667

-$17

$6,790

$8,314

BusLink Services - Christmas Cheer event

On Friday 21 December, the Transport team ran a promotion for all BusLink services.  This consisted of riding the bus free.  In Whangārei, staff and Councilors, John Bain and Paul Dimery did a sausage sizzle at the Rose Street Bus Terminus.  This was much appreciated by our regular bus passengers, and was well attended.

Road Safety Update

Despite continued and increased efforts from the regions Road Policing, Roading Engineers and Road Safety promotion partners, Northland’s provisional road toll for 2018 was 35.  The Provisional national figure is 379 but a number of crash victims are still hospitalised as critically injured so these figures could change.

Key advertising themes by the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for November and December 2018 was centred around ‘Speed and Motorcycling, Alcohol, Drugs’.

Nationally, the highest risks for fatal and serious injury crashes to date for November and December 2018 were –

·    Alcohol; Speed; Drugs; Fatigue; Motorcycling and Young Drivers.

Hospitalistion Provisional Data Northland Transport Injuries 2018 – Length of Stay (LOS).  There were 1258 <1 Day stays – 142 1-3 Day stays & 166 >3 Day stays for a total of 1566.  In 2017 there were 1158 <1 Day stays – 188 1-3 Day stays & 160 >3 Day stays to total of 1506.

Regionally the year to date road deaths stands at 2 with the main contributing factors being -

·    Speed;

 

Regional Road Toll Statistics – 2019 & 2018 Comparison Year to Date

Location

YTD 2019

YTD 2018

Far North

2

0

Whangārei

0

0

Kaipara

0

1

Northland

2

1

National

20

21

 

 

Maritime

Two new Maritime Officers started in November providing much needed additional resources to the team, along with a summer student who is assisting with some technical projects.

The infringement regulation for the Navigation Safety Bylaw was signed off by Parliament on 5 November and the new regulation came into effect on 7 December 2018.

A spare second hand engine has been purchased and serviced for the Waikare, which will serve as back up in case of sudden failure, and assist with the engine reconditioning over winter.  A reconditioned third engine will now always be on standby, as parts can take weeks to be delivered.

The month of November saw nine cruise vessels visit the Bay of islands with one double up day, in which both the Maasdam and the Pacific Explorer called.  There were six ships in December and thirteen in January plus some extra superyachts visiting.  The weather has been calm so no ships have cancelled this season so far.

The tier two oil spill response exercise scheduled for 14 November was suspended after an actual spill occurred at the refinery.  The incident was caused by a leak from a bunker fuel line on Jetty #2.  Loss of containment was minor and dispersed quickly, the refinery handled the incident as a tier one response with NRC staff in attendance.   The incident provided a good opportunity to test the combined Marsden Point response plan with all three ROSC present.  A follow up revalidation exercise was held on 22 January.  The ROSCs attended the annual oil spill conference in Tauranga.

The harbourmaster and maritime manager presented to the Maori Advisory Committee on how the oil spill response system works.  The Harbourmaster attended a two-day oil and gas workshop in Wellington in his position as National on Scene Commander.   The Deputy Harbourmaster attended a LINZ workshop on digital chart development in Auckland along with a Northtugz pilot.

All navigation beacons in Tutu kaka harbour have been renewed with positive feedback received. These were some of the last harbour board beacons to be replaced, with some found to be imbedded seven metres into the ground.  K12, a bent beacon in the Kioreroa Reach caused some concern amongst local residents.  It was removed and replaced with a buoy.

The annual Harbour Wardens meeting was held, in Waitangi on the 28 November 2018 with a good turnout.  This forum updates the Regional Wardens on latest safety advice, changes to regulations and this year’s summer boating safety campaigns.  Topics covered during the meeting included summer safety campaigns, the new bylaw and infringement regulation.  Peter Wiessing also attended as a guest speaker and presented on the Awanui flood scheme.

Summer bylaw and safety patrols were carried out over 16 days in the peak season in Bay of islands, Whangaroa, Tutukākā, Hokianga, Kai Iwi, Mangawhai, Whananaki, Whangārei and Ngunguru.  Fifteen days of biosecurity and pollution water runs were provided in support of those departments.

The on-water garbage service ran according to schedule with no days missed and received good reviews on a welcome service.

The bay has been busy with sail week, tall ships race and Millennium cup race, along with cruise ships.

Twenty one incidents were received over the month of November.  A large portion of the incidents are mooring related with several oil spill incidents.

Forty three incidents in December with the same number in January giving an overall total of eighty six.  Out of these incidents the majority consisted mostly of unregistered jet skis, speeding, sinking and dragging yachts. 2 abandoned boats were removed and destroyed.

No major oil spills were recorded.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                  item: 8.0

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Receipt of Committee Minutes

ID:

A1158061

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager

 

Recommendation

That the unconfirmed minutes of the:

·        Investment Subcommittee - 28 November 2018

·        Civil Defence Emergency Management - 4 December 2018

·        Regional Transport Committee - 5 December 2018

·        Property Subcommittee - 5 December 2018

be received.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Unconfirmed Investment Subcommittee Minutes - 28 November 2018

Attachment 2: Unconfirmed CDEM Group Meeting Minutes - 4 December 2018

Attachment 3: Unconfirmed Regional Transport Committee Meeting Minutes - 5 December 2018

Attachment 4: Unconfirmed Property Subcommittee Minutes - 5 December 2018  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Chris Taylor

Title:

Governance Support Manager

Date:

12 February 2019

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.0

19 February 2019Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.0

19 February 2019Attachment 2

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.0

19 February 2019Attachment 3

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.0

19 February 2019Attachment 4

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         ITEM: 9.0

19 February 2019

 

TITLE:

Business with the Public Excluded

 

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider the confidential matters detailed below for the reasons given.

Recommendations

1.              That the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider confidential matters.

2.              That the general subject of the matters to be considered whilst the public is excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to this matter, and the specific grounds under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution, are as follows:

Item No.

Item Issue

Reasons/Grounds

9.1

Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - 11 December 2018

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting -.

9.2

Receipt of Confidential Committee Minutes

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting -.

9.3

Human Resources Report

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a).

9.4

Sale of Council's Lessor's Interest in a CBD Property

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i).

9.5

Remission Policy

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, free and frank expression of opinions by or between or to members or officers or employees of any local authority s7(2)(f)(i) and the withholding of which is necessary to maintain legal professional privilege s7(2)(g).

3.              That the Independent Financial Advisor be permitted to stay during business with the public excluded.

Considerations

1.   Options

Not applicable. This is an administrative procedure.

2.   Significance and Engagement

This is a procedural matter required by law. Hence when assessed against council policy is deemed to be of low significance.

3.   Policy and Legislative Compliance

The report complies with the provisions to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting as detailed in sections 47 and 48 of the Local Government Official Information Act 1987.

4.   Other Considerations

Being a purely administrative matter; Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.