Council

Tuesday 17 March 2020 at 10.30am

 

 

AGENDA

 


Council Meeting

17 March 2020

Northland Regional Council Agenda

 

Meeting to be held in the Council Chamber

36 Water Street, Whangārei

on Tuesday 17 March 2020, commencing at 10.30am

 

Recommendations contained in the council agenda are NOT council decisions. Please refer to council minutes for resolutions.

 

Item                                                                                                                                                                                   Page

Housekeeping/Karakia

1.0       apologies (ngĀ whakapahĀ) 

2.0       DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (NGA WHAKAPUAKANGA)

             Councillors will be asked to confirm any pecuniary or non-pecuniary interests in the ports issue and the wider Supply Chain issue.

3.0       Health and Safety Report February 2020                                                                                           5

4.0       Council Minutes/Action Sheet/Council Working Party and Working Group Updates

4.1       Confirmation of Minutes - 18 February 2020                                                                                    8

4.2       Receipt of Action Sheet                                                                                                                          18

4.3       Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings                                                                   20

4.4       Working Group Updates and Chairperson's Briefings                                                                 21

5.0       Financial Reports

5.1       Financial Report to 29 February 2020                                                                                               22

5.2       Regional Rates Collection - Update to 31 December 2019                                                        26

6.0       Decision Making Matters

6.1       Local Body Election Matters                                                                                                                  31

6.2       Māori Representation                                                                                                                             50

6.3       Authority to Develop a Proposal for an Inter-regional Marine Pest Pathway Plan           55

6.4       Draft Council Submission on Proposed NES Outdoor Storage of Tyres                                 62

6.5       Northland Water Storage and Use Project: Additional Project Funding                               68

6.6       LGNZ Remits                                                                                                                                                71

6.7       Regional Software Holdings Limited - Six Month Report to 31 December 2019                77

6.8       Regional Software Holdings Limited Draft Statement of Intent for 2020-2022                 97


 

 

7.0       Operational Reports

7.1       Chair's Report to Council                                                                                                                     118

7.2       Chief Executive’s Report to Council                                                                                                 120

7.3       Northland Inc. Limited: Second Quarter 2019/20 Reporting Against Statement of Intent 2019-2022                                                                                                                                                                       147

7.4       Legislative Compliance for the Period 1 July - 31 December 2019                                       154

8.0       Receipt of Committee Minutes                                                                                                              156  

9.0       Business with the Public Excluded                                                                                                    161

9.1       Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - 18 February 2020

9.2       Receipt of Confidential Committee Minutes

9.3       Human Resources Report

9.4       Appointment of Northland Inc. Directors

9.5       Freeholding Industrial Area Ground Leases

9.6       Natural Hazards Request for Budget Carry Forward   

 


 

ACC - Accident Compensation Corporation

ALGIM - Association of Local Government Information Management

AMA - Aquaculture Management Area

AMP - Asset Management Plan/Activity Management Plan

AP - Annual Plan

BOI - Bay of Islands

BOPRC - Bay of Plenty Regional Council

CAPEX - Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets)

CBEC - Community, Business and Environment Centre

CDEM - Civil Defence Emergency Management

CEG - Co-ordinating Executive Group – Northland Civil Defence management team

CEO - Chief Executive Officer

CIMS - Co-ordinated Incident Management System (emergency management structure)

CMA - Coastal Marine Area

CPCA - Community Pest Control Areas

CRI - Crown Research Institute

DHB - District Health Board 

DOC - Department of Conservation

DPMC - Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet

ECA - Environmental Curriculum Award

ECAN - Environment Canterbury

EECA - Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority

EEZ - Exclusive Economic Zone

EF - Environment Fund

ELT - Executive Leadership Team

EMA - Employers and Manufacturers Association

EOC - Emergency Operations Centre

EPA - Environmental Protection Authority

ETS - Emissions Trading Scheme

FDE - Farm Dairy Effluent

FNDC - Far North District Council

FNHL - Far North Holdings Limited

FPP - First Past the Post – voting system for NRC elections

GE - Genetic Engineering

GIS - Geographic Information System

GMO - Genetically Modified Organism

HSNO - Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act

HBRC - Hawke's Bay Regional Council

HEMP - Hapū Environmental Management Plan

Horizons - Brand name of Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council

HR - Human Resources

HSWA - Health and Safety at Work Act 2015

IEMP - Iwi Environmental Management Plan

IPPC - Invited Private Plan Change: a process to allow Aquaculture Management Areas to be established

IRIS - Integrated Regional Information System

KDC - Kaipara District Council 

KPI - Key Performance Indicator

LATE - Local Authority Trading Enterprise

LGA - Local Government Act 2002

LGNZ - Local Government New Zealand

LGOIMA - Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

LGOL - Local Government Online

LTP - Long Term Plan

LTFS - Long Term Financial Strategy

MCDEM - Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management

MFE - Ministry for the Environment 

MHWS - Mean High Water Springs

MMH - Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited

MNZ - Maritime New Zealand

MBIE - Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

MOH - Ministry of Health

 

MOT - Ministry of Transport

MPI - Ministry for Primary Industries

MSD - Ministry of Social Development

NCMC - National Crisis Management Centre

NES - National Environmental Standards

NDHB - Northland District Health Board

NZRC - New Zealand Refining Company (Marsden Point)

NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation

NIF - Northland Intersectoral Forum

NINC - Northland Inc.

NIWA - National Institute of Water and Atmosphere

NORTEG - Northland Technical Advisory Group

NPS - National Policy Statement

NZCPS - New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement

NZTA - New Zealand Transport Agency

NZQA - New Zealand Qualifications Authority

NZWWA - New Zealand Water and Wastes Association

OFI - Opportunity for Improvement

OSH - Occupational Safety & Health

OSPRI - Operational Solutions for Primary Industries

PCBU - Person Conducting Business or Undertaking

PDF - Portable Document Format

PPE - Personal Protective Equipment

RAP - Response Action Plan

RAQP - Regional Air Quality Plan

RCP - Regional Coastal Plan

RFI - Request for Information

RFP - Request for Proposal

RTC - Regional Transport Committee

RLTS - Regional Land Transport Strategy

RMA - Resource Management Act 1991

RMG - Resource Managers Group (Regional Councils)

RMZ - Riparian Management Zone

ROI - Return on Investment

RPMP - Regional Pest Management Plan

RPMS - Regional Pest Management Strategy

RPS - Regional Policy Statement

RSG - Regional Sector Group

RSHL - Regional Software Holdings Ltd

RTO - Regional Tourism Organisation

RWASP - Regional Water and Soil Plan

SIPO - Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives

SITREP - Situation Report

SMF - Sustainable Management Fund

SOE - State of Environment (or) State Owned Enterprise 

SOLGM - Society of Local Government Managers

SPARC - Sport & Recreation New Zealand

STV - Single Transferable Vote

SWAG - Surface Water Allocation Group

SWPA - Sustainable Water Programme of Action

TAG - Technical Advisory Group

Tier 1 - Site level plan or response for an oil spill

Tier 2 - Regional level plan or response to an oil spill

Tier 3 - National level plan or response to an oil spill

TLA - Territorial Local Authority – City & District Councils

TMP - Treasury Management Plan

TOR - Terms of Reference

TPK - Te Puni Kōkiri (Ministry of Maori Development)

TUANZ - Telecommunications Users Association of NZ

UNISA - Upper North Island Strategic Alliance

WDC - Whangarei District Council

WHHIF - Whangarei Harbour Health Improvement Fund

WRC - Waikato Regional Council

WSMP - Workplace Safety Management Practices

WWTP - Wastewater Treatment Plant

 

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 3.0

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Health and Safety Report February 2020

ID:

A1291458

From:

Andree James, Health and Safety and Human Resources Advisor and Beryl Steele, Human Resources Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report provides an overview of health and safety activity during the month of February 2020.  It has been a relatively quiet month, however, there were two serious near-misses reported. 

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Health and Safety Report February 2020’ by Andree James, Health and Safety and Human Resources Advisor and Beryl Steele, Human Resources Manager and dated 28 February 2020, be received.

 

 

Background/Tuhinga

 

Injury Related

Hazards

Period

Loss time Injury

(LTI)

Accident Work

(ACC W)

Accident Not Work

(ACC NW)

Medical Treatment Incident

(MTI)

First Aid Treatment Incident

(FTI)

No Medical Treatment Incident

(NMTI)

Near Miss

Hazard

(HAZ)

Incident

(INC)

Security

(SEC)

2018

7

8

0

2

4

0

13

35

17

6

2019

1

20

1

0

2

1

18

15

8

1

2020

1

2

0

0

3

61

4

4

2

0

Jan

1

0

1

0

0

61

4

3

0

0

Feb

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

1

1

0

 

Events of interest

·    Near miss:  Two of our staff were in the Awanui river collecting samples.  One was acting as a spotter.  A truck arrived overhead some time later and proceeded to dump rocks into the river bed.  The spotter noticed this, and our staff were able to escape the area unharmed.  The Far North District Council, who contracted this work, are investigating to find out the identity of the contractors and address the issue with them.

·    Near miss:  There was an incident of road rage where one of our staff members felt it necessary to call 111.  A driver threw out a piece of rubbish in front of them when they were driving.  When our staff member pulled up at the traffic lights, they asked him why he threw out his rubbish.  It was at this stage the driver got aggressive.  After abusing our staff member, he followed them, driving erratically and dangerously.  The driver did end up turning off leaving our staff member to return to the Whangārei office.

·    Incident:  While at traffic lights a member of public tried to squeeze passed the rear of one our council vehicles and a traffic island to get into a turning lane.  The driver scrapped their vehicle while doing this.  No one was harmed and the damage to the council vehicle included a bent tail light and cracked lens. An insurance claim for our vehicle has been lodged.

 

Issues register

 

Legislative updates

Nil

Notifiable events

Nil

Wellness Committee

·    The Wellness Group sent out a thank you to those working in the drought team to acknowledge their work.  The feedback was positive.

·    The CEO from Vitae (our counselling service) visited where we discussed wellness programmes and services.

·    The updated flexible working policy was communicated to staff.

·    The stress project has been picked up by the Organisational Management Team to determine the cause of our worker’s stress, as it relates to them in the workplace, as reported in last year’s survey.  Once this is established an appropriate plan of action can be put in place.

 

Completed training

 

Training Completed February 2020

Pax

Risk assessment briefings

5

H&S Rep duties

5

Chemical handling and storage

1

Grand Total

11

 

·    Module 2 Health and Safety cancelled due to staff working on the drought and having other priorities.

·    STMS (Site Traffic Management Supervisor course) no nominations came in.

·    Customer Service Manager and Chairperson for the Health and Safety Committee will attend EMA Health and Safety Committee Member training and deliver in-house training to the Health and Safety Committee in April.

 

Forecasted training for March 2020

 

Training Forecasted March 2020

Pax

Site Traffic Management Supervisor Level 1 (STMS)

2

Grand Total

2

 

Working priorities for March 2020

 

Working priorities for March 2020

Executive Leadership Team action plan

Awaiting Traffic Management Plan approval

Escalated HSNO (hazardous substances) inventories

Traffic controllers trained to STMS

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

10 March 2020

 

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 4.1

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Confirmation of Minutes - 18 February 2020

ID:

A1292071

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager

 

Recommendation

That the minutes of the council meeting held on 18 February 2020 be confirmed as a true and correct record.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Council Minutes - 18 February 2020  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Chris Taylor

Title:

Governance Support Manager

Date:

10 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 4.1

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 4.2

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Receipt of Action Sheet

ID:

A1294098

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakārapopototanga

The purpose of this report is to enable the meeting to receive the current action sheet.

 

Recommendation

That the action sheet be received.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Council Action Sheet - March 2020  

Authorised by:

Name:

Chris Taylor

Title:

Governance Support Manager

Date:

09 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 4.2

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 4.3

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings

ID:

A1287953

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings’ be received.

 

Planning and Regulatory Working Party                                                                         (Chair: Cr Joce Yeoman)

The Planning and Regulatory Working Party met on Wednesday 29 January 2020.  The topics for discussion included:

Ÿ  Planning and Policy Work Programme

Ÿ  Regulatory Services Work Programme

Ÿ  Update on Regional Plan Appeals

Ÿ  Overview of Central Government Initiatives

Ÿ  Council Water Policy Development

Following discussion, the working party decided on the following next steps:

Ÿ  Present Coastal Occupation Charging to full council workshop by April

Ÿ  Project plan for the fishing controls project to be presented to the March WP meeting

Ÿ  Update on wetland mapping to be presented to the March WP meeting

Ÿ  Present water quality potential engagement models to the March WP meeting

 

Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party                                                                 (Chair: Cr Jack Craw)

The Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party met on Wednesday 29 January 2020.  The topics for discussion included:

Ÿ  Work Programme highlights

Ÿ  Work Programme gaps and issues

Ÿ  National issues

Following discussion, the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:

Ÿ  Examine strategic priorities at the March meeting

Ÿ  Review funding at the March meeting

 

 

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

10 March 2020

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 4.4

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Working Group Updates and Chairperson's Briefings

ID:

A1293116

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Working Group Updates and Chairperson's Briefings’ be received.

 

Awanui River Working Group                                                                                            (Chair: Cr Colin Kitchen)

The Awanui River Working Group met on Thursday 20 February 2020.  The topics for discussion included:

Ÿ  Budget

Ÿ  Works Programme 2019-2020 and 2020-2021

Ÿ  Awanui Scheme upgrade update

Following discussion, the Awanui River Working Group decided on the following next steps:

Ÿ  Obtain new contact for FNDC and DOC representatives

Ÿ  Send reminder to FNDC regarding NRC being an affected party for any works that may impact on the scheme

Ÿ  Review practicality of new 50m3 rule in flood hazard areas with NRC staff

Ÿ  Send letter of thanks to Mike Finlayson for his commitments and contribution to the Awanui River Working Group

 

Poutō Catchment Working Group                                                                                    (Chair: Cr. Penny Smart)

The Poutō Catchment Working Group met on Monday 17 February 2020.  The topics for discussion included:

Ÿ  Catchment plan implementation budget allocation

Ÿ  Canada Geese

Ÿ  Hornwort signage

Following discussion, the Poutō Catchment Working Group decided on the following:

Ÿ  Allocate $2,500 for native plants for lakeside planting in the winter of 2020

Ÿ  Allocate $4,800 for a fencing audit on up to 21 dune lakes on the Poutō Peninsula

 

 

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Bruce Howse

Title:

Group Manager - Environmental Services

Date:

10 March 2020

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 5.1

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Financial Report to 29 February 2020

ID:

A1292571

From:

Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant

 

Executive Summary / Whakarāpopototanga

This report is to inform council of the year to date (YTD) financial result to February 2020.  Council has achieved a YTD surplus after transfers to and from reserves of $3.08M, which is $397K favourable to budget ($47K higher than last month).

 

Recommendation / Ngā mahi tūtohutia

That the report ‘Financial Report to 29 February 2020’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 3 March 2020, be received.

 

Report


Revenue

Year to date revenue is $35.23M, which is $1.38M or 4.0% above budget.

 

In November, council’s externally managed funds transitioned from four funds to two funds.  As such the above table shows historical gains for the four older funds and gains since November for the two newer funds.  The performance of these funds in aggregate is $1.56M higher than budgeted.  Note that this does not include any accruals for February as the market turmoil has indicated that we should expect unfavourable performance for that month. An update on actual February performance will be provided at the March council meeting.

 

Additionally, council is now aware that the Marsden Maritimes Holdings Limited interim dividend has come in lower than budgeted by three quarters of a cent.  This equals $116K and will be present in the March financial result.

 

 

Expenditure

Year to date expenditure is $30.09M, which is $1.38M or 4.0% below budget. 

Note that across council there is a $370K favourable salaries variance predominantly due to delays in the recruitment of positions identified in the LTP and AP and the time to fill vacancies.  Some of these have associated external funding.  Additionally, across council there is a $61K favourable variance on annual leave movements as staff take leave accrued in prior financial years.

 

Transfers to reserves

For the year to date there has been a net transfer to reserves of $2.06M compared to a budgeted net transfer from reserves of $303K.  This is predominantly due to:

Ÿ $1.49M higher than budgeted transfers to externally managed fund reserves representing reinvestment of gains above budgeted levels.

Ÿ $201K lower than budgeted transfers from the Investment and Growth Reserve predominantly due to economic development grants not occurring as budgeted.

Ÿ $144K higher than budgeted transfers to the Whangārei and Far North bus reserves due to higher NZTA subsidies than budgeted.

Capital Expenditure

Actual capital expenditure year to date of $2.48M is $873K lower than budgeted capital expenditure of $3.35M.  At this stage there is anticipated to be carry forwards requested for the Awanui Flood Infrastructure, Water Street building reconfiguration, and the Kaipara Service Centre capital projects, but the exact value of any carry forwards is not yet known.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

10 March 2020

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 5.2

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Regional Rates Collection - Update to 31 December 2019

ID:

A1292873

From:

Simon Crabb, Finance Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The three district councils administer the collection of the regional council rates on our behalf.  The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the collection of this year’s current rates and the rate arrears owing to the regional council by each district council.

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Regional Rates Collection - Update to 31 December 2019’ by Simon Crabb, Finance Manager and dated 4 March 2020, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Table one over the page presents a full reconciliation of councils’ 2019/20 current rates and rate arrears that have been collected by each district council in the six months to 31 December 2019, and the outstanding amounts that remain to be collected.

Far North District Council (FNDC)

The Far North District Council has collected 45.7% of our current year rates (2018: 47.0%). 

7.9% ($306,458) of the outstanding rate arrears balance (2018: 7.5%; $221,517) has also been collected in the first six months of this financial year resulting in a closing rate arrears balance (excluding current year rates) still to be collected of $3,550,850.  Māori freehold land (MFL) accounts for $2,680,082 of the total rate arrears balance.

Attachment 1 is the revenue and collections report provided by Far North District Council outlining the actions they have in place to collect outstanding rate arrears. 

 

Kaipara District Council (KDC)

The Kaipara District Council has collected 50.5% (2018: 49.1%) of our current year rates.

28.4% ($253,841) of the outstanding rate arrears balance (2018: 23.6%; $143,645) has also been collected in the first six months of this financial year resulting in a closing total rate arrears balance of $640,773.

 

Whangarei District Council (WDC)

The Whangarei District Council has collected 58.5% of our current year rates (2018: 60.4%). 

 

39.5% ($136,264) of the outstanding rate arrears balance (2018: 40.3%; $132,572) has also been collected in the first six months of this financial year resulting in a closing rate arrears balance of $209,033.

 

When rates are received from the district councils they are deposited into council’s Short Term Investment Fund.  When council receives a lower level of rating revenue, it can result in a reduced level of returns derived from the Short Term Investment Fund.

The next rates collection update will be prepared for the nine months to March 2020 and presented to council at their May 2020 meeting.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: 2019/20 Q2 Far North District Council Rates Revenue and Collections Report  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

 

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                               ITEM: 5.2

17 March 2020                                                                                                                                                                Attachment 1

CMEETING:                 FINANCE COMMITTEE – NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL

 

Name of item:            REVENUE AND COLLECTIONS QUARTERLY REPORT as at 11 December 2019

 

Author:                          Margriet Veenstra, Manager - Transaction Services

 

Date of report:               16/12/19

 

Document number:       A2799434

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of the report is to provide quarterly reporting to Northland Regional Council on action taken to collect current rates and rate arrears, and to provide information on how collection is tracking against targets.

 

 

1)         Background:

 

This document has been prepared to highlight the actions taken by Far North District Council for the collection of the Northland Regional Council’s rates and to reduce the monies outstanding. This report is prepared as at the end of the second quarter of the financial year 2019/20.

 

 

2)         Discussion and options

 

General Title arrears update:

 

·    Last rating year, 64 properties were referred to an external Law Firm to proceed with legal action.

Action commenced on 45 properties;

§ Judgment by default was received for one property and another 6 have been submitted this month. A further 14 to be submitted in January 2020 once the deadline has passed.

§ 5 were paid in full and 11 have a Deed of Settlement agreement in place

§ Owners for 3 properties are to officially abandon the land

§ 5 require additional action, including serving of substituted service.

Remaining properties were withdrawn from legal proceedings as they were deemed to be Maori Land or subject to the 1967 Act.

·    Collation and investigation of the records for Abandoned Land properties is also in progress. Details are passed on to Council, Community Groups, iwi and Maori Land Court for feedback in January 2020.

·    Debt Management team participated in a Continuous Improvement workshop which identified 33 actions of which 17 are scheduled to be completed by January 2020. Some of the actions for rates & water include:

Direct Debit switch/set up offer in February and March supported by ASB

Improve accuracy of owner contact details and introduce track & trace

Create new chasing letter templates and improve current customer letters

Increase awareness of instalment due dates and payment options

New rate payer welcome pack

·    First phase of the Mortgage Demand process commenced in December for 194 accounts. Another 300 identified for the second phase due to take place in February.

·    The Te Hono team is still in the early stages of establishment.

·    Ongoing promotion of the Internal Affairs Rates Rebates Scheme in day to day communications with Ratepayers.

 

 

Collection Data

 

An analysis of the arrears, by collection status, is included in the following table. Arrears are the debt outstanding at the beginning of the 2019-20 financial year, together with arrears on rates for the 2nd quarter as at 11 December 2019.

 

 

Of the total number of accounts marked as ‘Balance to be collected by other means’:

 

·    For 55%, the arrears balance is made up of last year’s rates only. New initiatives are due to be introduced as part of continuous improvement actions.

·    For 24%, the arrears balance is made up of the last two years. These either require further action by Council Debt Management, Rates or Legal team or are waiting to be referred for Legal proceedings

·    Of this 79%, we are due to commence the next tranche of Mortgage Demand for another 30-35% in February 2020.

·    For the remaining 21%, the arrears balance is split across several years. These have received Final Demand letters and are waiting to be referred for Legal proceedings once the first groups have been completed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Council’s remission policies

 

Council’s remission policies are designed to recognise the unique nature of the Far North with its significant areas of unoccupied Maori freehold land. Overall the policies address issues of financial hardship and the protection of areas of land with particular conservation or community values. The following table shows the instance of remissions for each policy and the financial impact of these remissions.

 

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 6.1

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Local Body Election Matters

ID:

A1288315

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report serves a dual purpose:

 

1.    To present the report from Election Services Limited summarising the 2019 local government triennial elections (statistics, costs, upcoming issues); and

2.    To enable council to formally consider the electoral system to be used at the 2022 triennial election.

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Local Body Election Matters’ by Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager and dated 19 February 2020, and the report ‘2019 Triennial Elections’ by Elections Services and dated 17 February 2020, be received.

2.         That pursuant to Section 27 of the Local Electoral Act 2001, the council resolves to retain the First Past the Post (FPP) electoral system for the 2022 triennial election, and no later than 19 September 2020 give public notice of the right of electors to demand a poll on the electoral system to be used by the council.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Under the Local Electoral Act 2001 (LEA), every three years a local authority is required to consider the electoral system to be used for the next triennial election - unless the electoral system has recently changed (by resolution or outcome of a poll).

Accordingly, under Section 27 of the LEA, council may resolve by 12 September 2020 to change the electoral system it used at the last triennial election (the First Past the Post (FPP) electoral system), to the Single Transferable Voting (STV) electoral system.

Under Section 28 of the LEA, council must, no later than 19 September 2020, give public notice of the right of 5% of the region’s electors to demand that a poll be held on the electoral system to be used at the 2022 and 2025 triennial elections.  If a resolution to change the electoral system has been made by 12 September 2020, then this must be included in the public notice.

A brief explanation of the two systems available to the council is as follows:

First Past the Post (FPP) – the council’s current electoral system

The Northland Regional Council, along with the Whangarei District Council and the Far North District Council, currently use the FPP electoral system.  Electors vote by ticking their preferred candidate(s) and the candidate(s) with the highest number of votes is declared elected. 

Single Transferable Voting system (STV) – is an option for the council to consider

The second option available to the council is the STV electoral system.  This system is used for the Northland District Health Board (mandatory) and the Kaipara District Council elections in 2019.  Under this system, electors rank candidates in their order of preference.  The number of votes needed for a candidate to be elected (called the quota) depends on the number of positions to be filled and the number of valid votes cast.  The necessary number of candidates to fill all vacancies is achieved by:

·    The counting of the first preferences;

·    A transfer of the proportion of votes received by any candidate where the number of votes for that candidate is in excess of the quota; and

·    The exclusion of the lowest polling candidates and the transfer of these votes in accordance with the voter’s second preferences.

Considerations

1.         Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Retain the First Past the Post electoral system for the 2022 triennial election, and no later than 19 September 2020 give public notice of the right of electors to demand a poll on the electoral system to be used by the council.

·    The system is generally understood by most electors resulting in very few invalid votes (<.5%).

·    It is a simple and straightforward system for counting votes.

·   Once a candidate receives enough votes to be elected – any surplus votes are “wasted”.

 

2

Change to the Single Transferable Voting (STV) electoral system for the next two triennial elections, and no later than 19 September 2020 give public notice of the right of electors to demand a poll to countermand this decision.

 

·   STV attempts to promote proportional representation – the rationale is that when a candidate receives sufficient votes to be elected, any surplus votes are not wasted but are available to other candidates based on the second or subsequent preference of voters.

·   In NZ around 10% of votes are invalid due to voters filling out the voting forms incorrectly.

·    Will require a significant publicity campaign so that people understand the system and know how to vote correctly – increasing the probability that their votes will be valid.

·    More costly to implement.

·    Longer time to process and know the outcome of an election.

3

Undertake a poll of electors on whether the First Past the Post (FPP) or the Single Transferable Voting (STV) electoral system should be used.

·    The electoral system adopted would be a true reflection of the community’s preference.

·    The cost of the poll is estimated to be $180,000.

 

4

‘Do nothing’ apart from publicly notify the right to demand a poll on the electoral system to be used for 2022 triennial elections by 19 September 2020.  This option is not recommended, as it is considered good practice for the councils to articulate a position on the matter, plus if a poll is demanded, council would still need to fund it.

·    None apparent.

·    It is best practice for council to articulate a position on the matter.

·    If a poll is demanded council would still need to fund the estimated $180,000 cost for a poll.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.

2.         Significance and engagement

In relation to Section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is an administrative matter and part of council’s day to day activities.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

 

3.         Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

This report complies with Sections 27 and 28 of the Local Electoral Act 2001 in determining the electoral system to be used at the next local authority elections.  It also complies with the decision making requirements set out in Sections 76–81 of the Local Government Act 2002.

Further considerations

4.         Community views

It is considered that the community will support staying with FFP as it is an easier / less confusing system with a lower level of invalid votes.

5.         Māori impact statement

It is considered that Māori will support staying with FFP as it is an easier / less confusing system with a lower level of invalid votes.

6.         Financial implications

If the council resolves to adopt option 2, a budget needs to be set aside for a publicity campaign on change from FPP to STV.  This would represent unbudgeted expenditure if implemented in the current financial year.

If a poll is required (either by way of a resolution or demand by electors), the $180,000 cost would represent unbudgeted expenditure if implemented in the current financial year.

 

 

 

 

7.         Implementation issues

There are no implementation issues with the recommended option to stay with First Past the Post.  As above, if council elects to move to STV consideration would need to be given to the format and funding of a publicity campaign.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Election Services Report - 2019 triennial elections  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

03 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.1

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 6.2

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Māori Representation

ID:

A1290120

From:

Jonathan Gibbard, Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

At a workshop on 18 February 2020, councillors had a preliminary discussion about the prospect of establishing Māori constituencies prior to the next election in 2022.  Council has no legal obligation to consider this issue at this time as the legislative requirement to conduct a representation review does not apply until the 2025 election.  A council can, however, review its representation arrangements at any time and some councillors have indicated their desire to consider this issue at this time. 

Councillors are now being asked to indicate whether they would like staff to carry out more detailed investigations into the case for and against establishing Māori constituencies and how this may practically work.  A formal decision would then be put to the May 2020 council meeting to establish Māori seats for the 2022 election.  Should council decide to establish Māori seats in May, then there is a detailed statutory process to follow to identify the number of seats, constituency boundaries and consultation. 

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Māori Representation’ by Jonathan Gibbard, Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement and dated 25 February 2020, be received.

2.         That staff undertake further investigation into the establishment of Māori constituencies prior to council making a formal decision at its May 2020 council meeting.

Or

3.         That Māori constituencies not be established for the 2022 triennial elections.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Council conducted its last representation review in 2018 where it resolved not to establish Māori constituencies.  At that time, Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) and Iwi CEOs Forum indicated that they supported the establishment of Māori constituencies and saw this as an opportunity to strengthen council’s relationship with Māori and provide a real opportunity for Māori to participate in council decision making.  Given how recently this issue has been canvassed with Māori, it is unlikely that their position of support has changed.  With new councillors now settled in following the 2019 election, it is an opportune time to check whether council’s views on Māori seats have changed. 

Should council support further investigation into the establishment of Māori seats, preliminary discussions leading up to the May council decision paper could include:

·    More detailed discussion on the case for and against establishing Māori constituencies;

·    Experiences / comment from other councils who have already introduced Māori seats;

·    Feedback from Taitokerau Māori leaders;

·    Options for the number of elected representatives;

·    Possible scenario for workable constituency boundaries; and

·    Identification of additional cost implications should the council decide to proceed with this work in 2020.

Should the May decision support the establishment of Māori constituencies, the statutory process to develop an Initial Proposal, as prescribed in the Local Electoral Act 2002 (LEA), would commence with a view to being adopted by council before 31 August 2021.  An overview of the statutory process and timing is included as Attachment 1.

This matter is now set down for discussion.

Considerations

1.         Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Undertake further investigations into the establishment of Māori constituencies for the May 2020 council meeting.

Will provide the new council with more complete information on which to make a well-informed decision on whether they wish to pursue the establishment of Māori seats.

May create tension / divisions within council.

2

Do not establish Māori constituencies for the 2022 triennial elections.

No change to current constituencies.

No additional budget required to establish Māori constituencies.

Continued frustration and disenfranchisement of some parts of the Māori community at the continued lack of Māori representation around the council table.

No certainty that there will be Māori representation on regional council through local body elections.  The council currently has no Māori councillors.

A continued lack of Māori representation increases the likelihood that council decision making does not reflect the views and outcomes sought by Māori.

Unable to quantify the opportunity cost of the lack of diversity at governance / decision making level of council.

 

The staff’s recommended option is option 1.

 

 

2.         Significance and engagement

The decision sought today is only to conduct further investigations into the establishment of Māori constituencies, not the final decision as to whether they will be created.  In addition, the decision sought by this report is only one step towards a longer legislative process under the Local Electoral Act which provides for specific provision for community engagement and input into the decision at a later stage in the process.  For these reasons, council is able to make this decision without undertaking further community engagement at this time.

3.         Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

 The decisions sought meet the Electoral Act 2001 requirements, and in particular section 19Z.  This decision is also compliant with council’s decision making requirements as specified under the Local Government Act 2002.  Should council decide to conduct further investigations into the establishment of Māori seats, a full risk assessment will be completed at that time.  The risks of deciding not to establish Māori seats are outlined in the options section of this report.

Further considerations

4.         Community views

Should council decide to proceed with the establishment of Māori seats, views from the wider community will be sought as part of the public consultation process required under the Local Electoral Act 2001.

5.         Māori impact statement

As a result of previous discussions with Māori on this issue, it is anticipated that their indication of support for the establishment of Māori seats has not changed.  Should council decide to investigate this issue further, part of that work will involve seeking comment from Taitokerau leaders to be taken into consideration in future decision-making.

6.         Financial implications

Conducting investigations into the issues surrounding the establishment of Māori constituencies can be completed from existing resources.  Should council decide to proceed, the ongoing financial implications will form part of the report to be presented to a future council meeting.

7.         Implementation issues

Should council decide not to establish Māori constituencies and retain the status quo, there are no further implementation issues to consider.  Alternatively, should council resolve to establish, then the legislative process outlined in the Local Electoral Act 2001 will need to be followed and an Initial Proposal prepared for public consultation by 31 August 2021.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Statutory process and timing (A1291607)  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

10 March 2020

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.2

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 6.3

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Authority to Develop a Proposal for an Inter-regional Marine Pest Pathway Plan

ID:

A1291665

From:

Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist; Don McKenzie, Biosecurity Manager and Kathryn Lister, Biosecurity Officer - Marine

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The Top of the North Biosecurity Partnership (a collaboration between Waikato, Northland, Bay of Plenty, Gisborne and Hawkes Bay Regional Councils, Auckland Council, Biosecurity New Zealand and the Department of Conservation) has assessed a range of options and identified the management of biofouling on vessels as the preferred option.  This report seeks authority from council to develop a formal proposal for an inter-regional marine pest pathway plan under the Biosecurity Act 1993 to manage the spread of marine pests in a consistent manner across the Northland, Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty regions.  If council approves this step, staff would develop the proposal and supporting information required under the Biosecurity Act 1993 for council consideration later this year. 

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Authority to Develop a Proposal for an Inter-regional Marine Pest Pathway Plan’ by Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist; Don McKenzie, Biosecurity Manager and Kathryn Lister, Biosecurity Officer - Marine and dated 28 February 2020, be received.

2.         That council authorises staff to develop a formal proposal for an inter-regional marine pest pathway plan under the Biosecurity Act 1993 in conjunction with project partners.

3.         That council authorises staff to engage with Māori and key stakeholders in developing the proposal. 

4.         That staff bring the proposal back to council for consideration later in 2020, including the supporting information required under the Biosecurity Act 1993 and the results of further consultation with Māori and key stakeholders.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Marine pests pose a major threat to the ecological, cultural, economic and recreational values of the marine environment of the Top of the North (TON) regions.  They can out-compete, smother, predate on or otherwise adversely affect native species and impact marine habitats, with consequential impacts on ecological, cultural, economic and recreational values.  Once established, marine pests are extremely difficult to eradicate or contain and prevention methods are far more effective.

Most marine pests are predominantly introduced to New Zealand waters by ‘hitchhiking’ on incoming vessels and can be subsequently spread through domestic vessel movements.  These marine pest ‘pathways’ are typically hull biofouling (the build-up of marine organisms on hulls) and the discharge of ballast and bilge water.  Scientific evidence to date indicates that biofouling on vessels is the most common and highest risk pathway for the spread of marine pests.[1]  For vessels coming from overseas, there are national rules in place to manage the risk of marine pests being introduced to New Zealand (under the Craft Risk Management Standards managed by Biosecurity New Zealand).  However, there are no equivalent national rules that apply to domestic vessel movements.  It is estimated that the four main TON regions are home to approximately 50% of New Zealand’s domestic ‘fleet’.  This, in combination with the wide variety of relatively benign habitats available, means the wider TON area is particularly vulnerable to marine pest incursions.

To address these risks, the TON Biosecurity Partnership (a collaboration between Waikato, Northland, Bay of Plenty, Gisborne and Hawkes Bay Regional Councils, Auckland Council, Biosecurity New Zealand and the Department of Conservation) has been assessing options for better managing marine pests in the upper North Island.  This included the release of a discussion document seeking feedback on a range of options to manage marine pests released in March 2019 - ‘Better ways to stop marine pests? Ētahi tikanga pai atu mō te ārai orotā ō te moana?’  The discussion document focused primarily on options for consistent management of the ‘pathways’ for marine pest spread across the four key TON regions (Northland, Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty).  The consultation results were reported to the July 2019 council meeting.  The consultation indicated there is a good level of support for more action to prevent the spread of marine pests.  Council subsequently authorised staff to develop a preferred option for managing marine pests across the four regions in conjunction with the TON partnership.

The options considered and preferred approach with supporting rationale are discussed below.

The options assessment is summarised in Table 1 below.  Note: the inclusion of rules under the Biosecurity Act 1993 for bilge and ballast water discharges were initially considered but were not pursued on the basis of a lack of information and implementation difficulties (implementation and associated difficulties is a key consideration in the Biosecurity Act plan making process).

Table 1

 

Options

Criteria

Option 1

Status quo – each council continues with its own programmes

Option 2

Develop consistent inter-regional pathway rules requiring biofouling thresholds for craft be met at all times

Option 3

Develop consistent inter-regional pathway rules requiring biofouling thresholds for craft be met when moving*

Option 4

Develop consistent inter-regional pathway rules requiring biofouling thresholds for craft be met when moving into / between designated places

Consistency

X

üü

üü

üü

Efficiency (including compliance costs)

ü

x

üü

ü

Effectiveness (across regions)

X

üü

üü

ü

Ability to implement, monitor and enforce

ü

ü

üü

ü

*moving = when not moored or berthed at a structure designed and authorised for that purpose

The preferred approach recommended by the project partners is: a joint marine pest pathway plan applying within the coastal marine area of all four regions that sets a requirement for all craft to meet biofouling standards when moving (i.e., when they are not moored or berthed).  The rationale for this recommended approach is:

·    The movement of biofouled craft / vessels is the primary mechanism for the spread of marine pests. 

·    Requiring craft to comply with a specified level of fouling is proactive in that it manages risk without relying on detecting pest species on craft / vessels (i.e., compliance action can be taken in relation to fouled craft / vessels without needing to confirm the presence of marine pests which can be costly / problematic in many cases).

·    The four regions of Northland, Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty have a high proportion of New Zealand’s vessel fleet and therefore face the greatest risk from this pest pathway.

·    The approach is generally consistent with the controls that already apply to craft / vessels entering New Zealand under the international craft risk management standards.  

·    There is a precedent established through the Fiordland and Northland marine pest pathway plans and the Biosecurity Act 1993 provides for pathway plans to be jointly prepared and implemented by councils.

·    Requiring vessels to meet a biofouling standard at all times is likely to be cost-prohibitive (Option 2 is likely to have very high compliance costs).

·    Tracking vessel movements between designated places can be problematic (Option 4 relies on establishing a vessel has moved between places).

·    The status quo will not lead to consistency and is complex for boat owning public (with different rules / standards in each region).

Initial cost / benefit analysis indicates Options 3 and 4 are more likely to result in net benefits than Options 1 and 2 (Note: the cost / benefit analysis uses upper and lower ‘bounds’ to test variations in costs and benefits rather than generating a single net cost / benefit figure).  Table 2 below represents an average of the upper and lower bounds for each option.  The results of the initial cost / benefit analysis are summarised in Table 2 below:

Table 2 - Initial Northland benefit cost analysis[2] for inter-regional marine pest management pathway options[3]

While Option 4 is more likely to have a better net benefit (largely due to lower private costs of compliance and slightly lower public costs), experience to date with the Northland Marine Pest Pathway Plan indicates ability to monitor and enforce (implementation) is another key factor for decision making – Option 3 is likely to be simpler for all parties and easier to monitor and enforce as it does not rely on monitoring movement between places.

If council were to authorise development of a formal proposal (as recommended) and subsequently make an inter-regional pathway plan based on the preferred option outlined above, there would need to be an amendment to the current pathway rules in Northland.  However, this is a relatively simple procedural matter.  Implementation approaches and costs are expected to remain much as they are currently, with the exception that the change would likely mean monitoring and compliance is simpler.

Next steps

If council approves the development of a proposal for an inter-regional marine pest pathway plan, staff would present the formal proposal (with supporting information required under the Biosecurity Act 1993) to council for consideration later in 2020.  Council (and the other partner councils) would then consider the proposal against six key steps in the Biosecurity Act 1993.  The process for making an inter-regional marine pest pathway plan can effectively be condensed into two sets of decisions.  These are summarised in Table 3 below.

Table 3: Statement of Proposal process

Plan making step

Section of the Biosecurity Act

Steps 1 – 3

·      Initiate the plan by proposal under section 90 BSA;

·      Assess the draft against the requirements of section 91 BSA; and

·      Decide to publicly notify the proposal for a submissions and hearings process under section 92 BSA. This step would also decide on the nature of that process.

Steps 3 – 6

·      Achieve satisfaction on consultation under section 92 BSA after the public submissions and hearings process;

·      Approve preparation of the plan and decide the management under section 93 BSA;

·      Assess the plan against the requirements of section 94 BSA (which includes satisfaction that there will be adequate funding for the implementation of the plan for the shorter of its proposed duration and five years; and

·      Decide on the plan under section 95 BSA by producing a report which sets out the reasons for accepting or rejecting submissions, and the decided form of the plan.

 

The development of the ‘proposal’ itself is not expected to require significant resource and for the most part can be progressed by the project partners in-house and on a cost-sharing basis (as has been the case to date).  In the event the proposal is pursued, submissions could be heard by independent commissions or a panel of elected representatives from each council to ensure consistent recommendations back to each partner council.

Staff recommend that council authorise the development of an inter-regional marine pest pathway proposal on the basis of Option 3 as outlined above.  Once developed, the proposal would be put to council for consideration and a decision on whether or not to proceed further (i.e., public notification and submission processes).  It is also recommended that staff / project partners be authorised to undertake targeted engagement with Māori and key stakeholders[4] in further developing the proposal and preferred option.  The results of this consultation would be reported to council.

 

Considerations

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Maintain the status quo (do not authorise development of a formal proposal).

No further resourcing requirements.

No further progress is made to develop a consistent approach to managing the risk of marine pests spreading across (and beyond) the four regions.

2

Delay the decision to proceed with a formal proposal.

Opportunity for further consultation / analysis.

Risk losing stakeholder and agency support for improved rules.

Risk that partner councils proceed without Northland Regional Council.

3

Authorise staff to develop a formal proposal for an inter-regional marine pest pathway plan under the Biosecurity Act 1993 in conjunction with project partners (targeting the movement of bio-fouled vessels).

 

Further progress is made on the consistent management of marine pests across the top of the North Island.

Staff resources will be needed to manage the project.

4

Develop a proposal based on another option (e.g., require biofouling thresholds be met at all times).

Further progress is made on the consistent management of marine pests across the top of the North Island.

Likely to be inconsistent with partner regions / agency recommendations.

Staff resources will be needed to manage the project.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 3 as per the recommendation in this item.  This will provide staff with the authority to prepare the proposal, refine the cost / benefit analysis, engage with Māori and wider stakeholders and bring the formal proposal back to council for consideration.  Council can then make a decision on how to proceed.

2.         Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.  The decision to develop a formal proposal for a pathway plan under the Biosecurity Act 1993 does not commit council to a particular course of action at this time.  Once a formal proposal has been developed council can then decide on the need for further engagement / consultation or analysis and the process by which this should occur (and in fact council is required to consider these matters under the Biosecurity Act).  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions on this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.  The development of a proposal for a joint pathway plan under the Biosecurity Act 1993 has been the subject of consultation across the four subject regions and further engagement will be undertaken in development of the proposal.

3.         Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The decision to authorise the development of an inter-regional marine pest pathway plan proposal is the first step in meeting the requirements of section 90 and subsequent sections of the Biosecurity Act 1993 relevant to the making of Regional Pathway Plans.  The decision is therefore consistent with the relevant legislation.  The legislative steps in the Biosecurity Act 1993 will also be applied should council decide to proceed further, including the requirement that council is satisfied consultation / engagement has been adequate.

Further considerations

4.         Community views

The results of the public discussion document during 2019 indicated there is a good level of support for more action to prevent the spread of marine pests, and in particular ensuring consistent rules are put in place.  While there are also known sectors of the community who oppose (further) controls, much of this concern relates to how costs are apportioned rather than the pathway rules.  However, specific consultation on the preferred option outlined in this item has yet to be undertaken.  The Biosecurity Act process of making the Pathway Plan (subject to future council decisions) requires council to be satisfied consultation has been adequate and this decision on whether to develop a formal proposal in itself does not impact on any stakeholders staff are aware of.

5.         Māori impact statement

Engagement with Māori to date (through Te Taitokerau Maori and Council Working Party and the Māori Technical Advisory Group) indicates a good level of support for more action to prevent the spread of marine pests.  Also, past submissions received from iwi, whānau and hapu have supported rules aimed at preventing the spread of marine pests. However, specific consultation on the preferred option outlined in this paper has yet to be undertaken.  The Biosecurity Act process of making the Pathway Plan (subject to future council decision) requires council to be satisfied consultation has been adequate and this decision on whether to develop a formal proposal in itself does not impact on any stakeholders staff are aware of.

6.         Financial implications

Costs for developing the proposal can be met within existing budgets and are shared across partner agencies.  The financial implications of implementing a joint pathway plan (if such were to proceed) are more significant but likely to be similar in scale to those associated with the current pathway plan.  Staff also consider there would likely be some efficiency gains in implementing a joint pathway plan across four regions – more detail on implementation and costs will be provided with the formal proposal.  

7.         Implementation issues

There are no anticipated issues in developing the proposal other than coordination with multiple partners.  If a joint pathway plan is pursued, each region has discretion over how it would be implemented in its jurisdiction.  There is a risk that available resources or implementation challenges (e.g. a high number of vessels) will lead to inconsistent implementation across the regions.  However, it is likely an agreed approach to implementation will be developed to ensure a level of consistency is provided for council and public certainty.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Bruce Howse

Title:

Group Manager - Environmental Services

Date:

10 March 2020

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 6.4

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Draft Council Submission on Proposed NES Outdoor Storage of Tyres

ID:

A1292030

From:

Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report seeks the approval of a draft submission on a Proposed National Environmental Standard for the outdoor storage of tyres (Proposed NES).  The Proposed NES aims to provide a consistent regulatory approach for outdoor storage of tyres. The primary risks associated with stockpiled tyres are fire risk and leachate.  Currently each council is responsible for developing rules on tyre storage as appropriate (i.e. there are no national standards/rules).  Staff have developed a draft submission for consideration by council (attached).  Submissions close on 25 March 2020.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Draft Council Submission on Proposed NES Outdoor Storage of Tyres’ by Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and dated 2 March 2020, be received.

2.         That council approves the submission and that it be lodged with the Ministry for the Environment before 25 March 2020.

3.         That council authorise the Chief Executive Officer to make minor typographical, formatting or grammatical changes prior to it being lodged with the Ministry for the Environment.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Outdoor storage of tyres has the potential to create fire hazards and associated discharge of toxic / carcinogenic compounds that in the past have required evacuation of nearby residents – contaminants resulting from fires (and fire suppressants) can also enter soil and water.  Poorly stockpiled tyres can, over time, leach contaminants such as cadmium, lead, aluminium, manganese and zinc that can enter soil and water.  Stockpiled tyres can also provide habitat for pests (such as mosquitos and rodents), and impact on amenity values.  Removal of abandoned tyre stockpiles has created significant financial liabilities that in some cases have been borne by landowners and councils.  There are currently no national standards, regulations or rules that apply to the outdoor storage of tyres and each council develops rules as needed – this has led to tyres being moved between jurisdictions to avoid stringent rules / enforcement action. 

The Proposed NES aims to manage the risk from harm to human health and the environment from the outdoor storage of tyres and establish a nationally consistent regulatory regime.  The key features are summarised as follows:

·        A permitted activity rule for outdoor tyre storage less than the discretionary activity threshold (with conditions, including setbacks from water and the national grid).

·        A threshold for when consent is required for outdoor tyre storage – two options are being consulted on 100m3 and 200m3 (discretionary activity).  Note: Tyres used for weighting silage piles would be exempt from the consent process, but the permitted activity conditions would apply. 

·        Regional councils would be responsible for implementing and administering the NES on the basis that the key risks are more aligned with the regional council functions than those of district councils – it also means the issue of existing use rights would not apply to existing stockpiles (existing use rights do not apply to regional plan rules).

Staff have developed a draft submission for council consideration.  The key points are summarised below:

·        Support for the intent of the Proposed NES;

·        Support for a discretionary activity consent process with a threshold volume for outdoor storage of 200m3 threshold;

·        Support for permitted activity standards to be applied to outdoor storage of between 40m3 and 200m3 (with controls on setbacks from water, the national grid and plantation forestry);

·        Support for implementation / administration of the NES by regional councils (given the issues related to the outdoor storage of tyres are a better fit with the functions of regional councils than districts and regional consenting negates the effect of existing use rights); and

·        Support for the exemption from consenting for tyres used for silage (provided they are subject to permitted activity standards).

 

The Proposed NES is likely to provide an efficient and effective response to the issues associated with the outdoor storage of tyres experienced by multiple councils – especially the phenomenon where storage relocates to more lenient jurisdictions.  A draft submission is attached for consideration of council.  The consultation period closes on 25 March 2020.

Considerations

1.                                     1.         Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Council does not submit on the consultation document / Proposed NES

No staff time required.

The Ministry does not receive council’s views on the proposals.

2

Council submits on the consultation document / Proposed NES

The Ministry receives council’s views on the proposals.

Minor staff time required.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 2.

2.         Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

3.         Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The decision is consistent with policy and legislative requirements and is considered low risk.

 

 

 

Further considerations

4.         Community views

It is likely the subject matter is of some interest to sectors of the community, but no consultation has been undertaken on this specific issue.  However, the council submission does not impact adversely on these groups, and in fact is likely to represent a balanced view on the issue.

5.         Māori impact statement

It is likely the subject matter is of interest to Māori but there are no known particular impacts which are different from the general Northland community.

6.         Financial implications

There are no financial implications with council lodging a submission.  Financial implications of implementing the NES (associated with consenting and compliance) are expected to be minor.

7.         Implementation issues

There are no significant implementation issues anticipated.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Draft NRC submission - Proposed NES on outdoor storage of tyres  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

03 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.4

17 March 2020Attachment 1

 

 

Submission

 

To:                   Ministry for the Environment

By:              Northland Regional Council

On:                  Proposed National Environmental Standard for the outdoor storage of tyres

1.   Introduction

1.1.  Northland Regional Council (NRC) is grateful for the opportunity to comment on the Proposed National Environmental Standard for the outdoor storage of tyres (proposed NES). NRC’s submission is made in the interest of promoting the sustainable management of Northland’s natural and physical resources and the social, economic, and cultural wellbeing of its people and communities. Council welcomes the intent of the Proposed NES and considers it will be an improvement over the status quo.

2.   Background

2.1.  NRC generally supports the Proposed NES and considers the issue warrants intervention in the form of national standards given a consistent regulatory framework will provide an efficient means to resolve a number of issues across NZ.  Although we do not have a complete understanding of the scale of the issue in Northland, we have experienced several examples of tyres stored in inappropriate locations or in a manner that has the potential to cause environmental harm in our region – these tend to be on the smaller scale (around 50m3) but have been found close to waterbodies, the coastal marine area or in flood plains posing potential risks of impacts on water quality. 

2.2.  NRC would like to acknowledge the Ministry's contribution to upgrading the infrastructure at Golden Bay Cement near Whangarei to enable use of tyres in the manufacturing of cement as this provides an innovative method of disposal. We anticipate the Proposed NES will generally encourage use of end of life tyres at Golden Bay Cement but would be concerned if it added administrative costs / burden to this initiative (i.e. storage associated with use of tyres at the site were subject to unnecessary controls). We comment in more detail on the Proposed NES below.  

3.    Submission

3.1.  Regional council function: We agree that administration and implementation of the NES should be primarily a regional council responsibility. This is largely on the basis that risks are primarily related to water quality and the fact that ‘regional rules’ negate the effect of existing use rights available under Section 10 RMA.  If the function were left to district councils under district rules, the Proposed NES could not be applied to existing stockpiles, leaving a significant gap in regulation.

3.2.  Definition of site: We agree that thresholds (for permitted activity and consented volumes) should apply cumulatively per ‘site’ to avoid the situation where multiple storage piles are created on a property to avoid the volume thresholds. We support using the same definition of ‘site’ as used in National Planning Standards.

3.3.  Thresholds: In our view it is the larger stockpiles that are the real concern and we therefore consider the threshold for a discretionary activity consent of 200m3 is appropriate and do not see a need for consenting volumes below 200m3 – lowering the threshold to 100m3 would expose significantly higher number of parties to consenting costs for what we expect would be minimal benefit. This view is predicated on the basis that a permitted activity standard also applies to smaller volumes (40m3 – 200m3) to ensure the activity is managed appropriately. In other words, we consider permitted activity standards are adequate to manage stockpiles below 200m3 and see no need to reduce the consenting threshold below 200m3. We therefore support Option B in the consultation document.

3.4.  Permitted activity rule: We strongly support the inclusion of a permitted activity standard for outdoor tyre storage of between 40m3 and 200m3. Storage of tyres at this scale is common in Northland – primarily associated with the making of silage and with tyre retail outlets / auto industry. The conditions of the permitted rule appear sound and we strongly support the setbacks from the coastal marine area (50m), freshwater (20m) and the national grid. The exemption from water setbacks where storage is on impermeable surfaces with bunds to collect contaminants is logical but would benefit from a requirement that any discharge from the storage site must be managed (i.e. discharged to a wastewater network or treated to an acceptable standard prior to discharge to land or water). We would also suggest adding a setback of at least 100m from plantation forestry to mitigate fire risk – a similar requirement for setbacks from residential zoned land (or habitable dwellings) may also be worth considering.

3.5.  Exemption for tyres used for silage: We support an exemption for the storage of tyres used for farm silage from the consenting requirements in the Proposed NES. This is the most common tyre storage activity in Northland and while most would not exceed 50m3 or so, there is some potential for adverse effects on water quality if not managed appropriately. For these reasons we support storage of volumes of 40m3-200m3 being subject to permitted activity standards (subject to the comments above).

3.6.  Processing end-of-life tyres: It is increasingly likely that new uses for old tyres will be found (such as use at Golden Bay Cement) and that this will require some form of processing such as chipping / shredding.  The Proposed NES as it stands appears to be silent on the outdoor storage of chipped / shredded tyres (although this may be clarified in definitions). While there is the potential for discharges to exacerbated once tyres are chipped / shredded (given larger surface area) in our experience it is more likely that this material would be stored in containers and present far less water quality and /or fire risk. On this basis we do not consider there is a need for the Proposed NES to address this activity.

3.7.  Guidance: We support the development of guidance to support implementation of the Proposed NES. In our view this should focus on assisting those likely to fall within scope of the permitted activity rules (E.g. farmers, tyre dealers and auto wreckers) – in Northland these parties will be the cohort most affected and likely to require the most support to achieve compliance.

4.    Conclusion

4.1.  We thank the Ministry for opportunity to comment of the Proposed NES. As noted above we support the intent and proposals in the consultation document (subject to the comments above) – our preference is for Option B to be applied in the Proposed NES (200m3 threshold for resource consent and permitted activity standards applied to volumes of 40m3 – 200m3), with exemption from consenting for storage of tyres used for silage.  

 

Signed on behalf of Northland Regional Council

 

 

 

Malcolm Nicolson (Chief Executive Officer)                                 Dated:  XX March 2020

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 6.5

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Northland Water Storage and Use Project: Additional Project Funding

ID:

A1292235

From:

Darryl Jones, Economist and Andrew Carvell, Project Development Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

At its meeting on 16 April 2019, council formally endorsed the Northland Water Storage and Use Project and authorised the Chief Executive to finalise and sign the contract with Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) to secure up to $18.5 million in funding from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF).  Council subsequently applied for further funding from the PGF and have been successful in securing an additional $12 million in funding for the project. 

 

The purpose of this additional funding is to allow schemes in both the Kaipara and Mid-North option areas to proceed past the current Pre-feasibility Phase.  The additional PGF funding requires a commensurate lift in the co-funding requirement, but all other conditions of the existing signed funding agreement remain the same.  The additional funding and co-funding requirements were discussed at the council workshop on 25 February 2020, after which the Chief Executive Officer signed the funding variation agreement in order to expediate the agreement with MBIE so that the funding would be available for the Feasibility Phase which will commence in April.   

 

This paper seeks retrospective approval for the Chief Executive Officer to sign the funding variation agreement associated with the Northland Water Storage and Use Project.  

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Northland Water Storage and Use Project: Additional Project Funding’ by Darryl Jones, Economist and Andrew Carvell, Project Development Manager and dated 3 March 2020, be received.

2.         That council gives retrospective approval to the Chief Executive Officer to sign the Funding Variation Agreement with MBIE to secure the additional $12 million in funding from the Provincial Growth Fund for the Northland Water Storage and Use Project.

 

Considerations

1.         Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Authorise the CEO to sign the funding variation agreement.

Provides an additional $12 million in central government funding, bringing their total funding commitment to $30.5 million.

Requires council to secure additional co-funding.

2

Not authorise the CEO to sign the funding variation agreement.

Keeps co-funding commitment at current level. 

Limits the opportunity to proceed with developing viable scheme options in both Kaipara and Mid-North areas. 

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.

2.         Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it does not qualify as a significant decision when considered against the criteria in the 2018/28 LTP.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

3.         Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

 The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with the IGR criteria, the Long Term Plan, and council’s decision-making process as prescribed in the Local Government Act 2002.

Further considerations

4.         Community views

As part of the methodology used in the scoping of water use scheme options report, the project team identified and spent time with a selected group of stakeholders in both the Kaipara and Mid-North communities.  During the current Feasibility Phase of the Project public meetings have been held in these communities, as well as meetings with many individuals and interest groups.  Positive feedback has been received from these meetings.  A Project Advisory Group, consisting of land owners, tangata whenua representatives, local community representatives, NGOs, and industry, has been established and they are providing valuable insight into the process.

5.         Māori impact statement

Māori representatives are participating on the Project Advisory Group.  Approximately 20% of land in the two Mid-North study areas is Māori freehold land.  A specific plan to engage with Māori landowners to determine likely demand for water storage and use infrastructure is being developed.

6.         Financial implications

As discussed, the additional $12 million in funding from the PGF will require a commensurate increase in the co-funding requirements for the various project phases going forward (Table 1).  The total co-funding requirement for the remainder of the pre-construction phases (Feasibility and Commitment Phases) has increased from $1.2 million to $1.75 million, an increase of $550,000. 

Table 1. PGF and co-funding requirements by project development phase

 

 

Pre-feasibility

Feasibility

Commitment

Construction

Total

Indicative timing (fiscal year)

 

2019/20

2020/21

2021/22

2022 onwards

 

PGF funding

Original

$3M

$2M

$2m

$11.5M plus whatever is left over

$18.5M

Revised

$3M

$2.5M

$3M

$22M plus whatever is left over

$30.5M

Co-funding requirement

Original

$100,000 (3.2%)

$200,000 (9.1%)

$1.0M (33.3%)

To be determined

$1.30M

Revised

$100,000 (3.2%

$250,000 (9.1%)

$1.5M (33.3%)

To be determined

$1.85M

 

For the next phase of the Project, the Feasibility Phase, the co-funding requirement has increased from $200,000 to $250,000.  Council is seeking funding from the Far North and Kaipara District Councils to assist with this co-funding requirement.  In the meantime, council’s one-third share has been allocated from the Investment and Growth Reserve Project Development category by the board of Northland Inc.  For the Commitment Phase, it is intended that a good portion of the funding requirement would be secured from the private sector, proving that there is a commercially viable scheme option developed. 

7.         Implementation issues

The additional funding will require council to proceed with developing a viable water storage and use scheme option in both Kaipara and mid-North areas.  Council has been able to engage several contractors to support this project.  The additional funding allocation from the PGF is a signal that central government is confident that council can deliver the Project based on work done to date.  

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

10 March 2020

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 6.6

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

LGNZ Remits

ID:

A1292387

From:

Linda Harrison, Organisational Project Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The purpose of this report is to confirm council’s approval to submit two remits to the next Zone 1 and Regional Sector meetings with a view to gaining the support needed to take the remits to the LGNZ AGM in July 2020.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘LGNZ Remits’ by Linda Harrison, Organisational Project Manager and dated 3 March 2020, be received.

2.         That council support the submission of the remit to extend the electoral cycle from three to four years to the next Zone 1 and Regional Sector meetings and subsequently the LGNZ AGM.

3.         That council support the submission of the remit to request LGNZ provide video conferencing capability to the next Zone 1 and Regional Sector meetings and subsequently the LGNZ AGM.

 

Background/Tuhinga

It was resolved at the February council meeting to make a remit to Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) to extend the electoral cycle from three to four years.  Following that decision, further investigation into the process for doing this has been clarified and explained later in this report.  In addition, council has indicated that they would also like to make a remit to LGNZ to provide video conferencing capability for both elected representatives and staff.

LGNZ HQ has no video conferencing capability.  Informal requests to provide this service have been made previously but no progress has been made.  The lack of video conferencing capability puts the sector at complete odds with global and national priorities on reducing emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change.  Providing councils with no option but to undertake travel, often for only a few hours of meeting benefit, also puts LGNZ at direct odds with its own position on climate change and its own submission on the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill.  This council is of the opinion that LGNZ must live up to its own stated vision of enabling best practice and providing the maximum value possible for its members. 

Copies of both remits are attached to this report for council’s final confirmation or amendment.

LGNZ has a detailed format and process that must be followed to make a remit at their AGM which will be held in July 2020.  Included in these requirements is that remits must have the formal support of at least one zone or sector group or five councils prior to them being submitted for the AGM agenda.  Consequently, it is proposed to take these two remits to the next Zone 1 and Regional Sector Group meetings.

This matter is now set down for discussion.

 

 

 

 

Considerations

1.         Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Submit remits to Zone 1 and Regional Sector Group meetings to gain the formal support needed to include these items on the agenda for the LGNZ AGM

Councils will have the benefits of a longer term in office before elections.

Every three elections, local government elections will occur in the same year as national elections – unless the national election cycle is also extended to four years.

 

 

Councils will have the opportunity to reduce their carbon emissions by reducing travel to national meetings.

Council’s will lose the perceived benefits of meeting face to face instead of via technology.

2

Do not submit remits

There will be no change.

Councils will not have the benefits of a longer term in office before elections.

 

 

 

Councils will not have the opportunity to reduce their carbon emissions by reducing travel to national meetings.

 

The staff’s recommended option is option 1.

2.         Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, the decision to submit remits to LGNZ is considered to be of low significance because it is part of council’s day to day activities.

3.         Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

 The activities detailed in this report are part of the normal operating of the governance function and as such have been approved in the 2018–28 Long Term Plan approved in accordance with the council’s decision-making requirements of sections 76-82 of the Local Government Act 2002.

Further considerations

Being a purely administrative matter, Community Views, Maori Impact Statement, Financial Implications and Implementation Issues are not applicable.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Remit - Electoral Cycle

Attachment 2: Remit - Video Conferencing  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

10 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.6

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.6

17 March 2020Attachment 2

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 6.7

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Regional Software Holdings Limited - Six Month Report to 31 December 2019

ID:

A1292399

From:

Dave Tams, Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

Regional Software Holdings Limited (RSHL) produce a six month report for shareholders each year (Attachment 1).

 

 

Recommendation(s)

That the report ‘Regional Software Holdings Limited - Six Month Report to 31 December 2019’ by Dave Tams, Group Manager, Corporate Excellence and dated 3 March 2020, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Six Month Report to 31 December 2019

RSHL is a council controlled organisation owned by Waikato Regional Council (32.75%), Northland Regional Council (16.75%), Horizons Regional Council (15.50%), Taranaki Regional Council (15.50%), Southland Regional Council (15.50%), and West Coast Regional Council (4.00%).

RSHL provides a framework for collaboration between its owners and across the wider regional council sector, supporting the procurement or development of shared software services and products.  While the current flagship of RSHL is the Integrated Regional Information System (IRIS), the scope of activities for RSHL is not just limited to the IRIS application. 

Council’s Chief Executive Officer, Malcolm Nicolson, is one of the six RSHL directors.

Of note is the financial report that they are at risk of not meeting their financial target of operating within 5% plus or minus of its approved shareholder budget (P4).

·   At Risk spend on capital development has been reduced in favour of operational spend to identify the eventual replacement of IRIS,

·   ReCoCo activity continues to be unpredictable, although this does not impact on RSHL balance sheet.  All variations to budget have been approved by the board.

 

Considerations

1.         Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Receive the six month report.

Shareholder updated on financial performance.

No material disadvantage.

2

Do not receive the revised RSHL six month report.

None.

Shareholder not undertaking appropriate governance.

 

The staff’s recommended option is 1.

2.         Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The decision is consistent with policy and legislative requirements.

Further considerations

Being a purely administrative matter, Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications and Implementation Issues are not applicable.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: RSHL Six Month Report  to Shareholders 31 December 2019  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

03 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.7

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 6.8

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Regional Software Holdings Limited Draft Statement of Intent for 2020-2022

ID:

A1292456

From:

Dave Tams, Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The Regional Software Holdings Limited (RSHL) Statement of Intent specifies that a set of half yearly financials are presented to council before the end of February every year.

 

Regional Software Holdings Limited (RSHL), in which council has a 16.75% shareholding, updates its Statement of Intent annually.  The 2020–2022 Statement of Intent is presented for review as Attachment 1. RSHL draft statement of Intent 2021- 2023

Attachment 2. RSHL Covering letter for Draft 2020 -21 Statement of Intent

 

Recommendation(s)

That the report ‘Regional Software Holdings Limited Draft Statement of Intent for 2020-2022’ by Dave Tams, Group Manager, Corporate Excellence and dated 3 March 2020, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Statement of Intent (SOI) for 2020–2022

RSHL submitted their draft SOI to council for review.

 

·    RSHL is committed to ensuring that the IRIS software solution is based on a fully supported and future-facing technology platform.  As part of this commitment, RSHL is intending to invest in a technology refresh programme that will see capital investment shifting from the current platform towards the design and delivery of a future technology platform.  As the roadmap for this technology refresh is developed the investment profile and level of member contributions will be reviewed and reflected in the future SOI’s.

 

·    This decision is reflected in changes to the mix of capital and operating expenditure in 2020-21 along with an increase in investment in subsequent years to prepare the next generation IRIS platform.

 

Considerations

1.         Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Receive the revised RSHL Statement of Intent

Compliant with legislative requirements.

Revised SOI has the potential to create additional value to council’s investment.

No material disadvantage.

2

Do not receive the revised RSHL Statement of Intent

No advantage through not receiving the SOI.

Not compliant with legislative requirements.

Potentially destroys council’s value in our CCO.

 

The staff’s recommended option is 1.

2.         Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

3.         Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

 Schedule 8(2) of LGA 2002 requires a draft SOI to be delivered to shareholders on or before 1 March each year.

Further considerations

Being a purely administrative matter, Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications and Implementation Issues are not applicable.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Reginal Software Holdings Limited Draft Statement of Intent 2021-2023 final

Attachment 2: Regional Software Holdings Limited Covering Letter for Draft 2020-21  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Dave Tams

Title:

Group Manager, Corporate Excellence

Date:

03 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.8

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.8

17 March 2020Attachment 2

PDF Creator


 

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 7.1

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Chair's Report to Council

ID:

A1290994

From:

Penny Smart, Chair

 

Purpose of Report

This report is to receive information from the Chair on strategic issues, meetings/events attended, and correspondence sent for the month of February 2020.

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Chair's Report to Council’ by Penny Smart, Chair and dated 28 February 2020, be received.

 

Strategic issues

As I write the big dry in Northland continues.  Our Northland Regional Council (NRC) staff, our District Council counterparts and many other agencies have been working tirelessly to make sure that all of Northland continues to have access to water.  The commitment and standard of care that is being exhibited by the staff and agencies is second to none.  NRC is also monitoring and will be reporting back to council on the effects of this drought on our precious fauna and flora.  There will be many lessons learnt and changes made in the short to medium term in order to be better prepared for future droughts. 

I was very pleased to be present at the recent opening of the NRC Dargaville pop up office in Victoria Street, Dargaville.  While NRC very much appreciated being able to operate from Kaipara District Council offices it will be great to be more visible and accessible to Kaipara ratepayers in the main street until we move to our permanent premises on Hokianga Road next year.

The NRC Annual Plan and Fees and Charges are out for consultation.  The Long Term Plan forecast was for a 4% increase in rates.  What we are consulting on is a further increase of 4.6%.  This money will be used to increase our work in areas that we would otherwise fall behind in if we did not increase our spending.  Information and how to submit on the proposed Annual Plan increases and our Fees and Charges is available on the NRC website.

Council and councillors are six months into this triennium and work streams are going well.  The councillors are working very well together with everyone contributing to good discussion and debate.  Working Parties and Sub Committees have all met and set their priorities for the term.  We have a lot to cover this triennium and I am confident that we have a high calibre of skills around the council table, and also in our CEO and NRC staff.

 

Meetings/events attended

During this period, I attended the following meetings/events/functions:

·        Meetings attended with the council’s CEO, Malcolm Nicolson:

o   Mayors, Chair, and CEOs meeting with Minister of Local Government in Kerikeri.

o   Regional Sector Group meeting.

o   Northland Mayoral Forum held at Whangarei District Council.

o   Philippa Fourie, Mike Borrie and Rowan Hartigan, Fonterra.

o   Meeting with Kiwi Rail – Marsden Point line land acquisition.  Strategic Projects Manager, Phil Heatley, and Property Officer, Alicia Juricish, also attended.

o   Blessing for the new interim Kaipara Service Centre.

o   Northland wide water strategy discussions with Mayors, Chair, CEOs and Councillors from the four Northland councils.

·        Ko Waitangi Te Awa Trust launch at Te Tii Waitangi Marae.

·        An evening programme honouring Māori service in the Armed Forces at Waitangi Treaty Grounds.

·        Regular Mayors/Chair teleconference calls.

·        Tai Tokerau Northland Economic Action Plan Advisory Group meeting at Northland Inc.

·        Karen Adair, Deputy Director-General Agriculture and Investment Services, MPI – adverse events.

·        Regional Sector dinner and breakfast meetings.

·        Mayors/Chair only session prior to Northland Mayoral Forum.

·        Luke Beehre and Vaughan Cooper, Northland Inc. – E350.  Councillors Justin Blaikie and Jack Craw also attended.

·        LW Nelson Charitable Trust – annual meeting for 2020.

Correspondence

During February I sent out the following correspondence:

Date

Addressed To

Subject

04.02.20

Klaus-P Kurz

Northland Mooring Owners and Ratepayers

Answering questions from letter of 26 January 2020

11.02.20

Mr S J Ashby

Resource Consent Application APP.040976.01.01

14.02.20

Klaus-P Kurz

Northland Mooring Owners and Ratepayers

Issues with biosecurity charge and MPMP policy in general

26.02.20

John Schwartfeger

Presentation to council workshop

28.02.20

Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment

Investigation into effectiveness of marine biosecurity

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 7.2

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Chief Executive’s Report to Council

ID:

A1277003

From:

Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer

 

Recommendation | Tūtohutanga

That the report ‘Chief Executive’s Report to Council’ by Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer and dated 29 February 2020, be received.

 

7.2.1   AREAS OF FOCUS

Water Use

Water management continues to be a high priority with the ongoing drought being experienced in Northland, placing significant pressure on monitoring staff, albeit alleviated by everyone helping each other out where they can.

Rivers / Rain Situation

At our long operating river flow stations, the lowest seven-day mean flows on record occurred in the Awanui (since records began in 1958), Whakapara (since records began in 1959), Maungaparerua (since records began in 1967), Ngunguru (since records began in 1969) and the Wairua (since records began in 1960) Rivers, and second lowest on record in the Hikurangi and Ahuroa Rivers.

What’s notable is how much lower these rivers are than they have ever been recorded, with seven-day mean flows in the Awanui being 30% lower than the previously recorded; in the Whakapara they are 170% lower than the previously recorded; the Maungaparerua 50% lower and the Wairua 24% lower than previously recorded.

7.2.2   CEO’s Office

Council Property Update

The Project Control Group for Kensington Crossing is maintaining pressure to ensure construction remains on track to meet the May 2020 target for handover of the medical precinct tenancies to Kensington Health.  Opening is scheduled for Thursday 4 June, 2020.

The Kaipara Service Centre ‘Registration of Interest’ is being tendered on GETS.  The detailed design, budget and KDC lease is now being finalised for May 2020 Council consideration.

Kiwirail, Investment and Property Subcommittee Chair, Cnr Stolwerk, the Chief Executive and the Property Team met to discuss the transfer of Marsden Point Rail Link properties from Council to full Kiwirail ownership.  The ability for Council to retain ownership of the Flyger Road poplar nursery land was canvassed and agreed in principle.

Carter Holt Harvey have formally advised Council of their intention to exit the Council-owned 27-45 Union East Street and 50 Union East Street sites.  Council are in discussion with them regarding the termination date, ‘making good’ on exit and future easement arrangements for both parties.

Shared Services

Prioritising of four 2019-2022 Triennium Priority Projects (i.e. Economic Development, Four Waters, Climate Change and Refinement of the NTA) is being considered by councils. The deferment of current and future Northland Forward Together (NFT) projects would occur, however, ‘business as usual’ NFT projects, and the PGF initiative and Digital Enablement program, would continue.


 

Current Legal Proceedings

Department

Description

Status

Consent decision appeal

Replacement consents for, and new consents for an expansion of, Doug’s Opua Boat Yard in Walls Bay, Ōpua.

No further progress to report.

Consent decision appeal

Replacement discharge consents for East Coast Bays Wastewater Treatment Plant (Taipā)

Pre-hearing conference has been set for 12 March 2020.

7.2.3   Corporate Excellence

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Procurement of IT Hardware

Due to coronavirus, there is a lot of panic buying of computers occurring around the globe.  Long delays now being experienced in delivery of orders placed earlier this year, with laptops ordered in January now not expected to be received until May.  This is placing additional pressure on current stock levels with all spares now also deployed to staff, and the greatest pressure point being the request for laptops.

Cyber Security

Cyber security training continues to be provided for staff, with 141 staff having now completed the course.

FRAUD DECLARATION

I am not aware of any fraud nor am I investigating any incidence or suspected incidence of fraud at this time.

7.2.4   Regulatory Services

Consents in Process

During February 2020, a total of 110 decisions were issued.  These decisions comprised:

Ÿ Moorings                                                                   6

Ÿ Coastal Permits                                                     35

Ÿ Air Discharge Permits                                           0

Ÿ Land Discharge Permits                                     11

Ÿ Water Discharge Permits                                     3

Ÿ Land Use Consents                                              26

Ÿ Water Permits                                                       16

Ÿ Bore Consents                                                       13

The processing timeframes for the February 2020 consents ranged from:

Ÿ 154 to 2 calendar days, with the median time being 53 days;

Ÿ 89 to 2 working days, with the median time being 20 days.

Thirty-nine applications were received in February 2020.

Of the 112 applications in progress at the end of February 2020:

Ÿ 49 were received more than 12 months ago (most awaiting further information from the applicant);

Ÿ 15 were received between 6 and 12 months ago (most awaiting further information from the applicant);

Ÿ 48 less than 6 months.

Appointment of Hearing Commissioners

No commissioners were appointed in February 2020.

Consents Decisions and Progress on Notified Applications in Process, Objections and Appeals

The current level of notified application processing activities at the end of February 2020 is (by number):

Ÿ Applications Publicly/Limited Notified During Previous Month                    0

Ÿ Progress on Applications Previously Notified                                                       3

Ÿ Hearings and Decisions                                                                                                 0

Ÿ Appeals/Objections                                                                                                        2

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

The results of compliance monitoring for the period 1 – 29 February 2020 (and year-to-date figures) are summarised in the following table and discussed below.

Classification

Total

Full compliance

Low risk
non-compliance

Moderate non-compliance

Significant non-compliance

Not exercised during period

Air discharges

29

26

1

1

0

1

Coastal permit

59

55

2

1

0

1

Discharge permit

91

75

10

4

1

1

Land use consent

29

23

4

1

0

1

Water permit

127

68

26

31

0

2

Total

335

247

43

38

1

6

Percentage

73.7%

12.8%

11.3%

0.3%

1.8%

YTD

5,592

4289

532

374

184

213

Percentage

76.7%

9.5%

6.7%

3.3%

3.8%

Coastal

The majority of consents monitored during the reporting period related to coastal discharges and coastal structures.

Water, Waste, Air and Land Use (WWALU) Compliance Monitoring

Ÿ Aupōuri Groundwater Monitoring

Irrigation has commenced and monitoring staff are dealing with a lot of enquiries from both the public regarding the commencement of irrigation, and the 17 consent holders regarding the monitoring processes and costs.  Our new Compliance Specialist is taking a lead on the project to ensure we are managing and meeting our monitoring obligations.

Ÿ Air Monitoring

Monitoring staff were involved in discussions with Horticulture NZ throughout February about the rules in the Proposed Regional Plan.

 

Ÿ Land Use

Dust mitigation is a serious issue at present.  With water availability becoming an issue throughout the region, many earthworks sites are struggling to manage dust.  Monitoring officers are encouraging sites to change operational practices onsite to reduce dust without using large volumes of water. 

Ÿ Waste Management

Six incidents involving the discharge of hazardous substances and 14 enquiries regarding contaminated land were received and responded to.  475kg of hazardous waste was disposed of during the reporting period.

 

Environmental Incidents

There were no incidents recorded during the reporting period that resulted in a significant environmental impact.

ENFORCEMENT

Abatement notices, infringement notices and formal warnings

The following enforcement actions were taken during the period:

 

Infringement
Notice

Abatement
Notice

Total*

Nature of Offence

No. Offences

No. Notices

No. Offences

No.  Notices

No.  Offences

No.

Notices

Burning and smoke nuisance

0

0

1

1

1

1

Illegal activity in coastal marine area

1

1

1

1

1

2

Illegal take, dam or diversion of water

0

0

1

1

1

1

Illegal use of lake bed or river bed

0

0

1

1

1

1

No offence

0

0

3

3

3

3

Sediment

0

0

2

3

2

3

Sewage

0

0

1

2

1

2

Water abstraction

0

0

2

2

2

2

Total

1

1

12

14

12

15

*An infringement notice and an abatement notice may be issued for the same offence.  This means that in the above table, Column 5 (Total No. Offences) is not necessarily the sum of Column 1 (Infringement Notice No. Offences) + Column 3 (Abatement Notice No. Offences).

Other Enforcement

Ÿ Enforcement Order – Paihia wastewater treatment plant

Following a pre-hearing conference/settlement conference held on 4 March 2019, the Environment Court issued Enforcement Orders against the Far North District Council (FNDC) on 20 March 2019.  The orders set out milestones to complete an upgraded wastewater treatment plant.  FNDC have met the first four milestones – achieving the fourth one ahead of schedule.

Ÿ Farm dairy effluent – Pūrua

Charges were laid against a farm owner and his company, as well as the farm manager and his company for offences which occurred in August 2019.  There are five charges against each of the four defendants.  The farm has a poor history of compliance with regional rules for animal effluent disposal.  Disclosure has not yet been done.

Ÿ Sand dune removal – Tokerau Beach

Charges have been laid against two parties – an individual and his company for offending which occurred in July 2019.  The alleged offences include the removal of a sand dune at Tokerau Beach.  There are four charges against each of the two defendants.  Disclosure has not yet been done.

Ÿ Water Shortage Directions (WSDs)

WSDs were issued during February in relation to the following water resources:

-     Awanui River catchment

-     Awanui River (Kaitāia public water supply)

-     Wairoro Stream and Monument Hill groundwater (Kaikohe public water supply)

-     Waiotemarama and Waiarohia streams (Opononi and Ōmāpere public water supply)

-     Petaka Stream (Rāwene public water supply)

-     Hātea River (Whangārei city public water supply).

Ÿ WDC interim Enforcement Orders – waste removal from Sustainable Solvents site

The Group Manager Regulatory Services provided an affidavit to support the Whangarei District Council’s application for interim Enforcement Orders against Sustainable Solvents Limited, Brian Thomas Smith, Solvent Services NZ Limited, John Manus Pretorius and Aaron Geoffrey Baldwin.

Coastal / Water Quality Field Operations

Ÿ The recreational bathing programme has continued and weekly sample results were reported on the LAWA website. 

Ÿ Monthly cyanobacteria samples were collected at the four lakes we routinely sample and at an additional lake – Lake Rotopotaka or Coca Cola Lake – was sampled following notification of an algal bloom.  Results for Lake Rotopotaka identified very high cyanobacteria levels and as such the Northland District Health Board issued a public health warning and ‘closed’ the lake.

Ÿ Our monthly water quality sampling programmes were completed (four coastal runs, 13 freshwater quality and periphyton runs, and 7 continuous monitoring “validation” visits) and 27 lakes were monitored as part of our quarterly lake monitoring programme. 

Ÿ Fortnightly sampling was carried out at two locations, Hātea River Falls and Waiotu river, as part of a national sampling programme. The Ministry for the Environment is commencing a review of the recreational bathing guidelines. This programme aims to ensure the national guidelines remain fit for purpose, having not been reviewed for 20 years.

Ÿ On 3 March 2020, a telemetered coastal monitoring buoy was deployed in Lake Omapere to assist with assessing the water quality in real time for an emergency water supply to Kaikohe township.

HYDROLOGY

Groundwater

The latest round of conductivity readings at coastal bores are similar to previous readings and indicate no saline intrusion with the current low groundwater levels.  Groundwater levels continue to decline.  Many coastal aquifer levels are at or near lowest recorded since monitoring commenced in the early 1990s. 

Ÿ Water shortage directions have been issued for the small East Coast aquifers and consent holders taking water from these aquifers have been individually contacted.

Ÿ Monthly groundwater quality sampling of the state of environment monitoring bores in coastal aquifers commenced, with initial results expected to be available early in March 2020. More frequent (fortnightly) sampling is being planned for the Ruawai and Russell aquifers because of the risk of saline intrusion into those aquifers. Additional bores in the Russell township will also be sampled as a result of consistently low groundwater levels in the sentinel bore located near the Russell foreshore.

Hydrology Projects

Ÿ A low flow and water quality/ecology survey of the Waitangi catchment was conducted in late February 2020.

Ÿ A low flow survey of the Otaika and Ruakākā catchments was also done.  This data is important to build a picture of the impact of the drought and for later analysis and modelling.

Rivers / Rain Situation

Ÿ February 2020 has been another very dry month, with most gauges recording only around 0.5 to 10 mm, whereas just over 70 mm would be expected normally.

Ÿ The highest rainfall of 19 mm was recorded in the Opouteke and Te Puhi Catchments, but overall the region was very dry throughout, with periodic showers producing small rainfall totals.

Ÿ The dry February follows a very dry January with rainfall records showing that the last two months of rainfall was the driest two-month period on record at Kerikeri, second driest at Whangārei and third driest two-month period on record in Kaitāia.

A close up of a map

Description automatically generated

Natural Resources Data

Ÿ Implementation of the biological database (KiECO) continues.  The Data Team is currently focused on the import of “taxonomy trees” and formatting historical data. 

Ÿ During 2016, 25 water level and temperature sensors were installed in lakes in the Aupōuri and Poutō region.  The data recorded by these sensors is being processed and imported into our database.

Ÿ A number of data requests linked to the drought response are being processed and the Data Team has also been providing assistance to the Civil Defence Emergency Management Team.

Ÿ Set up is being carried out for automatic data transfer of level recorders installed in specific rivers to assist with compliance monitoring of water takes (i.e. Ahuroa at WDC weir, Wairoro at FNDC weir, etc.).

Ÿ Electronic data collection: A drought catchment survey was developed to enable data collection of low-flow, ecological and water quality field measurements.  Work was also done on a new electronic form to complete calibration and validation of meters in the laboratory.

Ÿ Coordinating LAWA requests:  LAWA Groundwater Quality Module – Final review and edits are scheduled in February and March.  The module is scheduled to “go live” on 27 March 2020.

Natural Resources Science

Ÿ Development of the science strategy and environmental monitoring network review has slowed as the Science Team has been involved in our drought response.

Freshwater Ecology

Ÿ On 19 February 2020, a drought ecological impact survey was conducted in the Waitangi catchment in conjunction with the Hydrology Team which has been undertaking low flow gaugings.  Twenty-seven sites were surveyed for periphyton growth, macrophyte growth and several physiochemical variables.

Ÿ As Lake Ōmāpere has a number of pest plant and fish, macrophyte and fish surveys were conducted in the Wairoro Stream at the Kaikohe water supply intake on 26 and 27 February 2020 to assess the current status of pest plants and fish at the site.  This information will be used to assess what mitigation measures could be put in place to reduce the risk of introducing ‘new’ pest fish and plants into the Wairoro Stream if lake water is used to supplement flows in the stream.

Ÿ The Science Team is working to identify a number of sites around the region for the deployment of further continuous dissolved oxygen (DO) and temperature loggers, with priority being given to water allocation priority catchments and catchments/sites where record low flows are being experienced.  This will increase the data we are currently receiving from the eight sites which have these in place.  Continuous DO and temperature are key indicators of ecosystem health.

Marine Ecology

Ÿ Samples were collected from Ahipara, Waipapakauri, Rarawa and Paihia beaches for microplastics analysis.  Microplastics include all plastic beads, fibres and fragments less than 5mm.  This work is part of an ESR led MBIE Endeavour Fund 5-year project, “Aotearoa Impacts and Mitigation of Microplastics”, which aims to assess the levels of microplastics in different environments, including the water, sediments and biota, so that we can better understand the risks that they pose to ecosystem health and primary industries.  This project is a unique opportunity to collect important baseline information about the levels of microplastics at some of our Northland beaches, that we wouldn’t otherwise have had the budget to test for currently.

Air Quality

Ÿ Ambient PM10 monitoring results for January 2020 for the Whangārei and Marsden Point airsheds and Kawakawa township show that compliance was met with the National Environmental Standards for Air Quality.  PM2.5 monitoring results for Whangārei were within the Ambient Air Quality Guideline value.

Ÿ Elevated PM10 and PM2.5 averages, recorded at our monitoring sites in November and December 2019, are back to normal in January 2020.  Australian bushfires and normal particulate monitoring results at NRC’s monitoring sites confirm that the elevated result was due to the bushfires.

Ÿ Unsealed road PM10 monitoring started in January 2020, with monitoring being undertaken at three sites to date.

Freshwater Quality

Ÿ Freshwater microplastic sampling:  A NIWA research scholar, Jen Drummond from the University of Birmingham, undertook river microplastic sampling from our SoE monitoring site “Hātea River at Mair Park” on 17 February 2020.  The microplastic sample from the Hātea River River is one of the few samples from five rivers in New Zealand, which will contribute to a global study known as “100 Microplastic Rivers”.  The objective of this study is to understand the transport and fate of microplastics in riverine systems.

Ÿ We are currently reviewing our water quality data and are in the process of identifying sites that fail the national bottom line under the NPS-FM.  We will work with the Land Management Team to provide details for each site as to what the results are, what the issues are, what is currently being done about them and what else could be done to improve the situation.

Freshwater Quantity

Ÿ A report on current drought and comparable drought events in the past has been drafted and is expected to increase understanding of the current drought characteristics and tendencies over time.

7.2.5   Environmental Services

LAND MANAGEMENT

Farm Plan and Environmental Fund Update

Farm Environment Plans 2019/2020

Environment Funds 2019/2020

FEP’s Commenced 2019/20

FEP’s Completed 2019/20

No of Environment Funds Granted

Amount Granted

99

105

147

$1,010,755*

*This includes MfE fund proportion of Hatea projects.

Waimā Waitai Waiora – Freshwater Improvement Fund

Objective

Status

Te Kawa Waiora

Two research positions could not be recruited as there were no suitable candidates.  Reconnecting Northland are looking at how they can meet the project requirements with available skills. The first wānanga is scheduled for 4 April in the upper catchment.

Farm Environment Plans

Ten Farm Environment Plans (FEP’s) have been completed in the catchment this calendar year bringing the total to 31 of a target of 40 this financial year.

Landowner grants

No further updates.

Communication and engagement

The first video on Mātauranga Māori is in its’ final production stage.  This video aims to enrich discussion on improving freshwater ecosystems and the solution it has to offer to reduce the impact of land use.

Water quality monitoring

The first monitoring wānanga in January was a success, and the team is now looking at how it can support hapū to continue this work in identified areas.

Sustainable Hill Country and Regional Priorities

Milestones

Status

Research

Coastal erosion buffers

A project plan has been developed and work has started on some of the objectives.

Mature poplar/ willow

A project plan has been prepared and costings are being determined.  Some poplar has been milled for treatment and lab testing.


 

Farm Environment Plans

 

There are 89 completed plans of the 112 required in the 2019-20 year.

Stakeholder Engagement

 

An engagement strategy has been developed.  The review of existing publications and preparation of new material (publications and website) is underway.  Organisation is also underway for the first stakeholder field day event, planned for some time in March-April.

Land Treatments

Retirement fencing

Thirteen fencing projects with retirement fencing of highly erodible land have been approved, with a forecast fence length of 13.9 km.  The fencing projects have a total value of $59,450.

Contractor capacity development

A list of contractors has been prepared.  There is a contractor field day event scheduled in March-April.

Hātea Project

The changed funding deed to extend the project until September still has not come through from the Ministry for the Environment (MfE) but is expected soon.  The final three fencing contracts are expected to be signed off within the next month.

Letters of appreciation have been sent from the Whangārei Harbour Catchment Group to the owners of two of the larger blocks in the Hātea catchment to thank them for their efforts to improve water quality.  Both landowners fenced over 3km of waterway each.

BIODIVERSITY

FIF Dune Lakes Project

Objective

Status

Aquatic weed and pest fish control

8,655 tench were removed from Lake Kapoai (west of Te Kōpuru) over three nights, with >99% of those caught juveniles.  Two large adult fish were also captured.

Sediment and nutrient mitigation

Planning continues for this work which will occur over the next two years.  A meeting held with landowners at Lake Waihopo (Ngataki, Far North) to discuss options.  Northland Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) mapping of sub-catchments has begun using provisional data.

Māori Lakes Strategy

A second iwi partner wānanga rescheduled for 24-25 February to progress the Māori Lakes Strategy was postponed for the second time because of staff secondment to assist Civil Defence with the drought response. 

The second of five dune Lake Education Days was held with more than 55 senior students at Lake Ngatu.  This event was moved to Lake Ngatu (Karikari peninsula) from Lake Rotopotaka (Awanui, Far North) because of a toxic algal bloom.  Once again, this event was successful.

Fencing

Plans to complete a short section of fencing at Lake Ngatu are underway.  A draft agreement between the Department of Conservation (DOC) and the Far North District Council (FNDC) to fence the road reserve was drawn up and is with DOC for signoff.  Works will commence after the agreement is signed.

Lakes

The dry summer has highlighted risks around using high value dune lakes for firefighting operations. Biodiversity staff have met with Fire and Emergency New Zealand and are working on protocols for reducing risks such as moving pest weeds and fish between waterbodies and water quality impacts.

Biodiversity and Biosecurity staff attended a council display at the Poūto Lighthouse Challenge event focusing on vehicles in dunes, dune restoration and prevention of spreading freshwater pests to lakes which included the Check, Clean, Dry message.

Terrestrial

Biodiversity staff assisted the Patuharakeke Iwi Trust with seed collection of more than 30 native species for a kauri dieback resistance testing project as part of a training day to increase kaitiaki capability in identifying forest plant species.

CoastCare

The Far North Kaitiaki programme has been running over the summer in partnership between council, FNDC, DOC and local hapū/iwi organisations. 

A team of 16 paid kaitiaki rangers and 8 youth volunteers representing their specific marae and the Ngāti Kahu, Ngāi Takoto and Te Rarawa Iwi have been patrolling popular coastal and responsible camping destinations. 

After the success of last year’s Karikari Peninsula programme, locations were extended to other holiday hotspots at Taipā, Kaimaumau and Ahipara including a stretch of Te Oneroa-a-Tōhē (Ninety Mile Beach) up to Hukatere.

Site visits and meetings with CoastCare groups have been held to plan dune restoration work. CoastCare staff attended the Waitangi Day event at Waitangi.

BIOSECURITY INCURSIONS AND RESPONSE

Myrtle Rust – Update

Myrtle rust has rapidly spread around the world in the last 40 years and is now established as a pest in many countries, including South Africa, China, Indonesia, Hawaii, New Caledonia and along Australia's eastern and northern seaboards.  It was found for the first time on the New Zealand mainland in May 2017, in a Kerikeri nursery (likely carried to New Zealand by strong winds from Australia).  Since then, myrtle rust has been found throughout most of the North Island, and across the top and on the west coast of the South Island.

Biosecurity New Zealand is no longer collecting, analysing, or reporting myrtle rust data.  Given the widespread distribution of the disease, targeted surveillance and control activities have ceased and the focus is firmly on:

Ÿ Research to build our understanding of myrtle rust.

Ÿ Research to identify possible tools, treatments, and future management options.

Ÿ Supporting landowners to minimise the impacts of myrtle rust on their plants, through advice on the myrtle rust website.

Further information can be found at https://www.myrtlerust.org.nz/.

KAURI DIEBACK

Management Plans

Kauri dieback management plans continue to be developed for all positive sites as well as those that are identified as medium – high risk sites.  All site occupiers receive advice and a basic management plan about how to best protect their kauri and forest from kauri dieback and other diseases.

Kauri Dieback Sampling

Potentially infected kauri are identified by both aerial surveillance and concerned landowners, and staff are visiting these properties to take samples for laboratory analysis of kauri dieback disease.  Results received between November 2019 – February 2020 are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1: Kauri Dieback Sampling Results (2019-2020 Year to Date)

 

Individual Sample Sites

Properties Involved *

Samples

54

28

Results received

8

8

Positive result obtained

4

4

Multiple sample sites are often present on a single property.

Community Engagement

Staff attended the Broadwood A&P show and engaged with landowners and the wider community about the importance of hygiene in preventing the spread of kauri dieback.

 

 

The council stand at the Broadwood A&P show attracted a steady stream of landowners and public seeking information on kauri dieback and other pest control issues.

A group of people standing in the grass

Description automatically generated

WILD ANIMAL CONTROL

Deer Skin Sighting

Biosecurity staff have responded to a report of deer skins hanging on a bridge barrier in Ōkaihau.  The skins have been confirmed as fallow deer and the skin condition placed hanging time within a 10-day period.  There have also been anecdotal reports from pig hunters of fallow deer sightings and fallow deer skins hanging on fences within the Ōkaihau /Puketī area. 

The Puketī area is currently under surveillance by the deer response contractor whose range has now been extended to include the new site and surrounding landscape.  Council staff are also conducting follow up enquiries with farmers located near the site.

Sika Deer Eradication

Biosecurity staff and the deer response contractor have met with a manager and lessee of two large farm blocks bordering the Ngaiotonga reserve (adjoining Russell Forest) with an objective to eradicate Sika Deer in the area.  After the discussions, surveillance and control plans for sika deer have been requested for both properties.

Feral Pigs

There have been several requests for pig traps.  In particular, small block landowners with heavily covered wooded areas, dams, or swampy conditions are havens for mobs of feral pigs.  These pigs cause destruction to regenerating areas of under growth.  A rise in pig numbers and public requests are expected this autumn, so provisions are being made to employ a pig contractor to assist with the response. 

A Rāhiri landowner has designed a pig trap with potential to catch and hold mobs of five or more pigs.  Biosecurity and Department of Conservation staff are working with the landowner to develop the trap into a modular design for the ease of transportation.

Feral Cattle

Council staff are continuing to assist multiple land owners in Pākanae (South Hokianga) to deal with feral cattle.  A local farmer to setting up a facility on one of the properties to attempt a muster of the cattle for removal.

Check, Clean, Dry

Biodiversity staff and the Check, Clean, Dry Advocate attended the Poutō Lighthouse Challenge on 15 February.  The challenge is an 18 km run, walk, bike (or combination) return trip from Waikaretu Marae to the Poutō Lighthouse.  The event was well attended with approximately 150 participants and spectators – many of whom visited the Check, Clean, Dry Stand.

The Check, Clean, Dry stand at the
 
Poutō Lighthouse Challenge.

A sign on the side of a building

Description automatically generated

PARTNERSHIPS

Kiwi Coast Trust

The Kiwi Coast Trust’s main highlights for the month included:

Ÿ Backyard Kiwi Release:  The trust supported the release of five kiwi at Pārua Bay. 

Ÿ Kiwi Listening Blitz:  Analysis of data from the second Kiwi Listening Blitz fieldwork is progressing.  The Blitz investigated changes in Northland kiwi distribution and will be used to map changes in kiwi distribution.

Ÿ Trap Catch Data:  The response to the trust’s request for 2019 trap catch data (from all groups and projects involved in the trust) has been excellent.  The seven-year trap catch tally is already well over 300,000 (with more data still to be added).

A picture containing person, grass, small, holding

Description automatically generated

Hancock the kiwi at the Backyard Kiwi release.  Hancock was named after
Hancock Forestry who are doing sterling work protecting kiwi in Northland. 

Tutukaka High Value Area

Highlights include:

Ÿ Predator Control:   Trap catch data for the start of the 2020 calendar year is detailed in Table 2. Stoat and rat catches are declining in the start of the year whilst there is a steady increase in possum catches.

Table 2: Trap Catches by Tutukaka Landcare 2020 Calendar Year

 

Species

Jan - Feb 2020

Total Catch 2019

 

 

Possum

110

727

 

 

Rat

59

1,467

 

 

Stoat

6

68

 

 

Weasel

2

48

 

 

Cat

1

16

 

 

Hedgehog

14

151

 

Ÿ Public Awareness and Education:  The annual Trapper’s Workshop was hosted at Tawapou (Matapōuri) on 8 February with excellent attendance by around 60 community members.   A comprehensive (and entertaining) overview of the importance of predator trapping with useful advice for those setting up voluntary trap stations was given by a Predator Free 2050 affiliate.  Tutorials on the various trap types were held generating a stream of questions.  Around 20 SnapE box traps were distributed to the eager members for them to get started in trapping operations.

The Tutukaka Landcare Chairman addresses a large crowd at the annual Tawapou Trapper’s Workshop.

Ÿ School Awareness and Education:  Two half day sessions were attended at Ngunguru School teaching the senior classes on subjects including:

Ÿ Food chains and invasive animals.

Ÿ Setting up and maintaining school rat traps safely, hygienically, and effectively.

Ÿ Logging of trapping data into Trap.NZ.

Ÿ Tutukaka Landcare internship positions were also opened to the Ngunguru School year 7 students Cameron with 8 responses to date.  The Landcare is currently working with the school’s teachers to select the two successful applicants for the 2020 year.

Ÿ Weed Control:  The core Specialist Weed Assistance Team (SWAT) have put in over 60 hours in the month focused mainly on community events including the Trappers Workshop at Tawapou, and a stand at the Tutukaka Twilight Market.

Piroa-Brynderwyn High Value Area

The group is continuing to extend the coverage of the Celium remote trap monitoring network.  The trap monitoring devices (nodes) are placed on predator traps throughout the landscape and communicate to a base station called a hub.  The hubs then transmit the data via satellite or a cellular network.  The group is investigating the installation of a second Hub on the high point of the Brynderwyn range that will enable predator traps to be monitored on both sides of the range and possibly extend over 50 km as far north as the Whangarei Heads.

Whangārei Heads High Value Area

Once again Backyard Kiwi received huge support with their kiwi release.  Over 400 people turned up to see the release of 5 kiwi into the Pārua Bay area and hear about the protection of kiwi.  These kiwi will be roaming between the Kiwi Link and Whangārei Heads High Value areas.

Over 400 people attended the Backyard
Kiwi Release at Pārua Bay.

Centre of attention!  An NRC Biosecurity Officer introducing  a soon-to-be-released kiwi to the crowd.

Mid-North High Value Area

Ÿ Predator Control:  More stoat and possum traps have been deployed in the field with some impressive results.  Huge pest kill numbers have been recorded in the 2019 calendar year from new groups where pest control has been limited in the past including 2,968 possums from one group and 3,221 from another.  Momentum is continuing to increase with skill building a key part in getting more people involved and confident in trapping.

Ÿ Distressed Kiwi:  Kiwi are stressed with the dry weather and are being spotted more often in the daytime.

Daytime kiwi.  An unusual and upsetting sight, kiwi stressed from
the dry conditions are being spotted more frequently in daytime…

Western Northland Pest Control

Ÿ Predator Control:  Ground based possum control using Feratox has been completed by community members in the Wekaweka Landcare Community Pest Control Area (CPCA).  Work has started on marking bait station lines for possum and rat control in the Te Toa Whenua CPCA project area along the Waipoua river.  Pūpūrangi Nature Sanctuary volunteers have begun installing 200 “bait safe” bait stations received through their CPCA agreement.  These stations prevent rat interference with baits increasing the amount of bait available to kill possums.

Ÿ Wilding Conifer Control:  Planning for wilding conifer control at the Kai Iwi Lakes is well underway with operational work to begin in March.

Ÿ Paparoa A&P Show:  The 144th annual Paparoa A&P show was held on 1 February.  The council stand (empathising pest animals and weeds) attracted a steady flow of enquiries from landowners seeking information and assistance with various pest issues.

Predator Free 2050

Planning for this landscape scale project continues.  Activities included:

Ÿ Whangārei Predator Free Project Plan: The plan and milestones continue to be refined with input from key project partners – this plan will be used to finalise the contract agreement with Predator Free 2050 Ltd.

Ÿ Ngunguru Marae Hui:  Council staff hosted a hapū representative’s hui at Ngunguru Marae.  The proposed predator free program of work was openly discussed and opportunities for hapū and whanau identified.  Engagement with further hapū representatives will continue over coming months.

Ÿ Communication and Engagement Workshop:  A workshop was held with representatives of key project partners.  Output of the workshop will be used in the development of the Whangārei Heads Predator Free Communication and Engagement Plan.

Tānekaha CPCA

Kiwi Microchipping: Local support in the Tānekaha CPCA continues to grow, staff completed a kiwi chick microchipping and education event on 28 January.   Over 70 members of the public attended where they got to meet two kiwi chicks up close.

Kauri Landcare

Local involvement and engagement has formed a new landcare group at Kauri.  The Kauri Landcare group was spurred on by the enthusiasm of Fonterra staff who have been actively trapping on their farm site in the last 6 months.  The group will encourage the wider area to become involved in predator control, and their early priorities are expected to involve setting up a trapping workshop to upskill local residents on trapping/pest control tools.

MARINE BIOSECURITY

Hull Surveillance Programme

In the month to 20 February 2020, the 2019/2020 Hull Surveillance Programme surveyed 186 vessels (refer Table 3).  There were three incidents; all were of Sabella spallanzanii (Mediterranean fanworm) – one on a vessel at anchor in Whangaruru Harbour and two vessels on moorings in Mangonui Harbour.  Two were resolved rapidly via diver removal, and the third was directed for an immediate haul-out and clean. Two Sabella were also found on the substrate beneath one of the infected vessels in Mangonui. 

Marine biosecurity staff alongside Biosecurity New Zealand are currently conducting an assessment of the surrounding area to determine the extent of this possible incursion; however, it is highly likely these had recently dropped off the vessel in question and do not indicate a local population.  Staff will keep the local community and wider public appraised of this situation as the assessment progresses.

Table 3:  Hull Surveillance Programme Results (21/01/2020 – 20/02/2020)

Hull Surveillance Programme Results (21/01/2020 – 20/02/2020)

Total this period

Total
YTD

Number of vessels surveyed this period

186

1,329

% Pathway Plan Compliance*

46%

54%

Vessels found with Marine Pests

 

 

Sabella spallanzanii (fanworm)

3

64

Styela clava (clubbed tunicate)

0

169

Undaria pinnatifida (Japanese kelp)

0

1

Eudistoma elongatum (Australian droplet tunicate)

0

2

Pyura doppelgangera (sea squirt)

0

0

*    This is the percentage of vessels surveyed that complied with the acceptable level of ‘light fouling’ as defined in the Marine Pathway Plan.  Note: actual compliance is higher given not all these vessels will move from one designated place to another.

Top of the North (TON) Marine Biosecurity Partnership

The Top of the North Marine Biosecurity Partnership (TON) group have been very active in recent months.  The group met formally in Auckland on the 20 February, to arrive at a preferred option for managing the risks of invasive marine species in the Northland, Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty regions.  The option has been agreed on and indictive regional cost-benefit analyses conducted with the support of economists and science staff from across the regions.  The option will be presented to the four councils between March and May 2020 and next steps decided on (Item 6.3).  The TON group also continues to set a powerful example of collaborative management investing widely in engagement and research

Maritime and Marine Biosecurity working closely together

The Marine Biosecurity Manager spent the day out with councillors in and around Ōpua on the 5 February, alongside maritime staff.  This was a great opportunity to discuss critical issues facing both maritime and marine biosecurity staff working to protect Northland’s marine environments. 

Marine Biosecurity and maritime staff have also been finding ways to collaborate and work effectively together to mutually support each other as we work in the challenging marine environment.  Staff from both teams spent a day conducting a preliminary assessment on a vessel that had sunk on a mooring as well as conducting hull surveillance checks in Whangaruru Harbour.

PEST PLANTS

Exclusion Plant – Houttuynia cordata

Follow up inspection undertaken at the two known Houttuynia cordata sites.  Regrowth was observed at both sites and treated.  In addition, an extensive survey involving four staff was conducted at the newly discovered incursion site in Whangārei to ensure the full extent of the infestation had been identified.  No further infestation areas were identified.

Eradication Plants – Batwing Passionflower

The third and final area of grid searching in the Kamo reserves and associated private forest areas was undertaken by contractors.  This area is the furthest from the core of the infestation and the interior areas were found to be relatively clean.  However, new sites were located at the margins indicating that additional surveillance on properties to the west and south west is required.

Eradication Plants – Evergreen Buckthorn

Abseiling work undertaken to control evergreen buckthorn on the coastal cliffs at Sandy Bay.  The infestation levels have been significantly reduced from the previous year.

Eradication Plants – Spartina

A new spartina infestation was reported and confirmed in the Mangawhai estuary. This is the first known site in this harbour.  Staff have undertaken an initial delineation and will begin discussions with landowners and iwi about undertaking control.  Wider aerial surveillance may also be required.

Kaipara Harbour:  17 spartina management sites visited and extended survey undertaken.  These sites were prioritised for surveillance as they were either considered historic or had incomplete records.  Of the prioritised sites:

5 had no plants observed upon survey.

4 had undocumented infestations of reasonable size.

 

Encroaching spartina growing under
mangroves in the Kaipara Harbour.


FRESHWATER PESTS

Lake Kapoai Tench Netting

Netting at Lake Kapoai in late January removed 8,655 tench (Tinca tinca) whilst 19,075 native common bullies (Gobiomorphus cotidianus) were caught and released back into the lake.  This work involved a collaboration of council Biodiversity and Biosecurity staff working with the local Fish and Game Ranger to count the 27,500+ fish.

 

 

Large tench taken from Lake Kapoai. 
The large fish on the right is a gravid female.

Dune Lakes Education Events

The second of five dune lake education events was held at Lake Ngatu on 20 February.  Some 50 students from three kura (Te Rangi Āniwaniwa, Te Hāpua, Ngātaki) learned about pest and native fish, tuna, water quality testing, and lake plants.  These events provide an opportunity for council to demonstrate the importance of not releasing unwanted pets like turtles and goldfish into the wild, while educating students about pest fish species and their impact on New Zealand’s water ways.  These events are part of the FIF Dune Lakes project, administered by the Ministry for the Environment, and in conjunction with Enviroschools and Te Aho Tū Roa.

Royal Society Te Apārangi, Science Teaching Leadership Programme

This month saw the commencement of a Royal Society Te Apārangi Science Teaching Leadership placement.  The Council is a host for a participating teacher from Whangarei Girls High School who will be based in the Biosecurity Pest Plant and Freshwater team until early July.

This programme provides opportunities for nominated science teachers to enhance the teaching of science within school communities, by experiencing roles that incorporate ‘science in action’ and building links between schools and industry.  Participating teachers are placed with a host for six months then return to school to work with their colleagues to improve science teaching and student learning.

Work experience will involve observing and participating in science used in pest management and biodiversity protection in Te Tai Tokerau, as well as collaborative activities with local communities, iwi/hapū, landowners, scientists, and central government agencies.  The placement is expected to lead to more community engagement opportunities for council. 

Activities so far have included assisting with koi surveys, turtle trapping, and setting up for Dune Lake Education Events.

Science field work in action – setting a trap to
catch an invasive red-eared slider turtle

A person standing next to a tree

Description automatically generated

Inter-Regional Collaboration – New Zealand Biosecurity Institute Northland/Auckland Branch

Members of the Biosecurity team attended the New Zealand Biosecurity Institute (NZBI) Northland/Auckland Branch at Unitec, Auckland on 19 February.  These meetings offer valuable knowledge sharing opportunities to connect people and organisations working in Biosecurity.  The meeting was well attended with members from council, Ministry for Primary Industries, Auckland Council, and the Department of Conservation.   Presentations included:

Ÿ Monitoring Invasive Species (Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research)

Ÿ Biocontrol in Auckland (Auckland Council)

Ÿ Journal: Perspectives in biosecurity (Unitec)

Ÿ Back to Basics: Predator traps that work (Northland Regional Council)

Ÿ Northland Hull Surveillance Programme (Northland Regional Council)

There was also a presentation from the Auckland Council Environmental Services team on their new structure and discussion on how the councils can work more collaboratively.  NZBI meetings are an important opportunity for staff from neighbouring regions to network and work closely together on shared issues.  The forum is being promoted vigorously.

RIVERS

Long Term Plan Projects

Rivers

Comments

Awanui

Works kicked off on 24 Feb at the Juken New Zealand spillway.

Landowner engagement is progressing, however, approximately 30% of landowners did not return emails or calls.  The team will look at Public Works Act provisions to progress engagement.

Kawakawa – Taumārere

The New Zealand Transport Association is tendering the project and expected to start works mid-March.  Staff met at Ōtīria Marae on 19 February to present the project timeline to the committee.

Whāngārei

Woods Road Flood Wall asphalt re-surfacing is scheduled for April.

Panguru

Practical completion of major works, with topsoil and re-grassing on hold for rain.   

Kaihū

The second helicopter spraying of Manchurian Rice Grass is scheduled for early March.

Kerikeri-Waipapa

The design work for the Whiriwhiritoa flood mitigation work has been awarded. 

NATURAL HAZARDS

Work Streams

Status

Comments

Awanui Flood Model

95%

Review identified 3 breakout points on the Tarawhataroa Stream.  We are investigating options to mitigate this flooding.  

Coastal erosion hazard mapping

20% complete

Site visits for 10 new erosion assessment locations were undertaken by Tonkin and Taylor during January.

40% complete

Auckland University (co-funded by the National Science Challenge) is undertaking mapping of Northland historic shorelines which will give a picture of erosion risk across Northland.

Coastal flood hazard mapping

Project is 50% complete

DHI New Zealand are developing a hydrodynamic flood model for the Northern Kaipara harbour, which will produce coastal flood maps for the harbour.  The model builds on an existing model developed by Auckland Council.

Tonkin and Taylor have been awarded the tender for the region-wide coastal flood hazard assessment. The project will involve coastal flood hazard mapping for entire coastline, at a range of sea level rise scenarios, to be used for regulatory hazard maps and climate change adaptation planning.

Region-wide flood mapping

Planning Phase

Project to develop area-specific design storm rainfall characteristics to improve the accuracy of flood models is being led by Auckland University.

The tender to develop a hydro-enforced digital elevation model will be advertised early March.

The tender for a region wide river flood model will be advertised shortly, with the project to begin at the start of June.

Climate Change Response

Ÿ National Climate Change Risk Assessment workshops:  Council staff have attended these National Risk Assessment workshops in both Wellington and Auckland. 

Ÿ Northland Climate Change Risk Assessment: Council staff are also conducting a risk assessment for Northland.  The data collation phase is nearly complete and involved two days of staff workshops held in mid-February.  Over 50 staff and Māori representatives from across the region attended the workshops.  A spatial risk mapping process will now be undertaken over the next three months.  A tender for GIS services was advertised recently and preliminary results are expected by the end of April, with final deliverables due end of May.  The climate change risk assessment will feed into the regional adaptation strategy due in August 2020.

Ÿ Regional Adaptation Group:  The next group meeting will take place at council on 5 March and will focus on integrating climate change adaptation into the long term plan for all councils and developing the adaptation strategy.

Ÿ Chief Executive’s Forum:  Council staff presented to the Chief Executive’s Forum last month and as a consequence put forward a paper to the Mayoral forum recommending the formation of an inter-council joint committee on climate change adaptation.  This will be consulted on with iwi and hapū and will be presented at the next Northland Forward Together meeting at the end of March.

Ÿ Council Climate Change Working Party:  Staff are reporting to the council Climate Change Working Party and developing options for the declaration of a climate change emergency.

Ÿ Long Term Plan:  Staff are including council’s climate change adaptation work programme in the Natural Hazards Management Activity area for the long term plan.

Northland Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Capture

After review, some small areas required re-capture and flying of these sites finished 23 February.  Data has been couriered to Australia for processing, and results are expected in early April. 

7.2.6   STRATEGY, Governance And Engagement

PROPOSED REGIONAL PLAN

There are 23 appeals (to the Environment Court) against the council’s decision on the Proposed Regional Plan for Northland (Proposed Plan). 

The Council circulated a reporting memorandum to the Court and appeal parties on 28 February  2020.  This outlined that through mediation, the parties have managed to reach consensus on a large number of appeal points.   The council has drafted consent memorandum documents for topics/sub-topics where multiple appeal points have been resolved and these documents have been circulated to parties to sign.

There remain a number of appeal points that are unresolved but resolution is possible.  Discussions on these provisions are ongoing.  There are a number of appeal points that require case management towards hearings.  A Pre-Hearing Conference is set down for 12 March to discuss procedural issues around the identified provisions.  The Presiding Judge has also directed that a hearing be set down for unresolved air quality provisions in April and a hearing be set down for unresolved mangrove management provisions in May.

Additionally, Court-assisted mediation on the appeal relating to GE/GMO occurred on 24 February 2020.  Discussions between the parties are ongoing with regards to this appeal. 

CORPORATE PLANNING

Council has two LGA Section 17A service delivery reviews underway.  Consultants have been engaged to conduct reviews on both the maritime and investment property activities.  Drafts of both reviews are due at the end of February.  No other services are due for review in the 2019/2020 financial year.

NATIONAL INITIATIVES

Proposed Amendments to the National Environmental Standards for Air Quality

The Government is seeking feedback on its proposed amendments to some provisions of the National Environmental Standards for Air Quality.  The aim of the amendments is to better control the release of fine particles into our air.

The proposed amendments also include controls on mercury emissions.  These would help New Zealand meet our obligations under the Minamata Convention on Mercury.

The closing date for submissions is 5.00pm on Friday 24 April 2020. A draft submission will be put to the 21 April Council meeting for consideration.

Proposed National Environmental Standard for Outdoor Storage of Used Tyres

The Government is seeking feedback on its proposed national environmental standard for the outdoor storage of tyres.  The proposed standard builds on an earlier consultation in 2017.

Three key variations to the original NES proposal:

1.      Responsibility for the NES - It is now proposed regional councils be responsible for administering the NES.

2.      Threshold for consent - Feedback is now sought on two potential NES thresholds for requiring discretionary resource consents for the outdoor storage of tyres.  These are the option consulted on in 2017 (200m3) and a new option of 100m3, which is intended to provide a stronger framework for mitigating key environmental and public health risks.

3.      Permitted activity rule with requirements - Introducing a permitted activity rule with requirements for outdoor tyre storage between 40m3 and the volume threshold for discretionary resource consent.

Submissions close at 5.00 pm on Wednesday 25 March 2020.  A draft submission is included in the council agenda (Item 6.4).

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Investment and Growth Reserve – Projects Report

Project

Update

Future developments/ reporting

Resources Enterprise Limited (REL)

High Court not prepared to grant judgement based on documents alone, set date for hearing from parties. 

Continue to work with lawyers and REL on repayment of money owed. Court hearing date scheduled for 3 March 2020.

Northland Water Storage and Use

Final draft reports received from consultants on water resources and scheme design and costings.  Planning for next phase has begun.

Final Pre-feasibility reports and recommendation on Feasibility work to MBIE by end of March.

Manea Footprints of Kupe

Invoice for second tranche of funding received.  Seeking additional information. 

Payment of second tranche once conditions of funding meet.

Hundertwasser Art Centre (Whangārei)

Letter received from WAM requesting additional funding to complete HAC.  Request passed to Northland Inc for assessment.

Recommendation from Northland Inc. on additional funding request due in April.

Extension 350

Quarterly report for period ending 31 December received and third quarter payment made.

 

Extended Regional Promotion

Six monthly report for period ending 31 December received and first half year payment made.

 

ONLINE CHANNELS

Most popular content on Facebook for February – An education post urging those saving water by bathing in our rivers, to leave soap and detergents at home.  When river levels are low and not flowing like they normally do, the effect of soap, shampoos and detergents is even greater.  The post reached more than 29,000 people and engaged with over 700.

*Engaged – number of people who ‘reacted’, commented or shared the post

Key Performance Indicators

Oct-19

*Nov-19

Dec-19

Jan-20

*Feb-20

WEB

 

 

 

 

 

# Visits to the NRC website

23,500

25,300

28,452

31,900

35,500

E-payments made

12

8

13

5

12

# subscription customers (cumulative)

1,159

1,160

1,171

1,172

1,176

SOCIAL MEDIA (cumulative)

 

 

 

 

 

# Twitter followers

1,486

1,488

1,493

1,503

1,515

# NRC Facebook fans

9,053

9,131

9,163

9,231

9,976

# NRC Overall Facebook Reach

128,300

72,900

94,591

250,500

327,700

# NRC Engaged Daily Users

8,900

8,842

6,995

6,132

23,500

# CDEM Facebook fans

17,100

17,200

17,300

17,400

18,000

# CDEM Overall Facebook Reach

44,200

68,000

96,064

75,500

404,200

# CDEM Engaged Daily Users

3,626

6,752

12,428

5,969

42,500

# Instagram followers

960

977

991

1,033

1,103

*November 2019 report was for 29 days, February 2020 for 28 days (usually 30-day reports)

ENVIROSCHOOLS / EDUCATION

Ngā Tupuranga o Te Taitokerau

On 11 February, a training session was held at the Northtec Marae in preparation for the youth leadership course to be held at the end of March.  Content included experiential learning, behaviour change and the sustainable development goals. 

New Early Childhood Enviroschools
On 18 February, a ‘Welcome to Enviroschools workshop’ was held for ten early childhood centres and five kindergartens.  Participating teachers and centre managers explored the Enviroschools resources, tried out experiential learning activities and shared environmental mahi. 

Dune Lakes Education Day
On 20 February, a ‘Getting to know your dune lake’ day was held at Lake Ngatu (Waipapkauri).  The day included four action stations: pest and native fish, dune lakes plants, tuna (eels), and water quality testing.  Tamariki from Ngataki and Te Hapua Schools and Te Rangi Aniwaniwa took part in this Freshwater Improvement Fund Dune Lakes Project education initiative.

Hokianga Festival for Change
On 28 February, one of council’s Enviroschools Facilitators participated in the Hokianga Festival for Change with a display and activities.  Connections were made with Enviroschools from Hōreke, Kohukohu, Mangamuka, Omanaia, Opononi, Panguru and Rāwene.  This is the first year that staff attended this Rawene based festival providing information on pest animals and kauri dieback.

MARKETING AND ENGAGEMENT

Waitangi Day

NRC attended the Waitangi celebrations with a display in the lower treaty grounds (adjacent Te Tii marae).  In 2019 this was where other environmental groups were based, so it was thought that this would be a more suitable location than with the food and market stalls in the upper sports field.  Coast Care and Maritime were present, along with messages on NRC Scholarships and Environmental Awards.

North Hokianga A&P Show

NRC attended the Broadwood show with information on pest trapping, land management and kauri die back.  Staff had a number of enquiries in each area and felt that some useful conversations were held.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INFORMATION (LGOIMA) REQUESTS

Month

LGOIMA requests
received 2018/19

LGOIMA requests
received 2019/20

July

15

15

August

20

22

September

7

16

October

5

29

November

10

11

December

9

12

January

11

14

February

15

21

March

9

 

April 

12

 

May

19

 

June

11

 

TOTAL LGOIMA REQUESTS RECEIVED

143

140

Total LGOIMA requests not responded to within 20 working days*

1

7

*       REQ.598078 ­ The staff member was busy responding to drought matters and did not respond in 20 working days.  Further clarification is required and has been sought.

         REQ.598045 ­ This was the second request by the same person for the same information that council does not hold on its database, so it was not able to be provided.  The staff member was on leave and did not respond in 20 working days.

7.2.7   CUSTOMER SERVICE – COMMUNITY RESILIENCE

CUSTOMER SERVICES

Telephone Inbound Call Statistics & Enquiries

 

February 2020

Target

Call volume via Customer Services

2,841

 

Conversion rate

98.7%

>95%

Average wait time

4 sec

 

Calls answered in under 30 sec

97.7%

>90%

In February, call volumes were 30% up on normal levels with many calls relating to the drought situation.  Most civil defence calls bypass the switchboard, so the increase is predominately from members of the public.  As the drought has progressed, the type of enquiries has changed from requests for information about water restriction to more calls reporting incidences of potential unauthorised water take.

Satisfaction Monitoring

•    Feedback Cards, Compliments and Complaints

Feedback cards have been included with compliments and complaints, as appropriate.

Compliments received

Total

Service provided by a specific person

·    P Dickson - Maritime

·    H Giles – Monitoring

2

Overall service

·    Consents

2

Total compliments recorded

4

Complaints received

Total

Standard of service provided

·    Transport - Bus Service x2

·    Transport - BeeCard

3


 

Disagree with decision or process

·    Maritime

·    Monitoring

2

Lack of information or communication

·    Biosecurity

1

Staff / contractor behaviour or attitude

·    CDEM

·    Monitoring

·    Transport - Bus Service

3

Total complaints recorded

9

Four of the complaints related to various aspects of the bus service, for example bus running early, bus driving past bus stop, frustration with setting up BeeCard.  All bus complaints have been acknowledged.

Two customer complaints were about driving and cite lack of courtesy in merging.  Both complaints mention the drivers being in a hurry (not speeding) and are most likely an indication of the current pressures on our staff as both were attending to drought-related activities.  The relevant managers have been advised of the complaints for follow-up with their staff.

The two complaints where there is a disagreement with council decision are ongoing.  All other complaints have been closed.

Interim Kaipara Office

A small blessing ceremony was held for our new Kaipara office at 100 Victoria Street, Dargaville.  The office will be open to customers from Monday 2 March and will be an interim base for our Kaipara staff until the new building in Hokianga Road is ready.

TRANSPORT

Regional Transport Committee

The Regional Transport Committee (RTC) met on 12 February, where the following was covered:

·   Regional Land Transport Plan 2018/2021 funding assistance uptake by the regions approved transport authorities;

·   Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) quarterly regional update;

·   Regional Road Safety quarterly update;

·   Update on the progress of the “Investigation into the Needs and Availability of Total Mobility, Disability Transport and Services in Northland”;

·   A request from the Far North District Council to vary a project in the Regional Land Transport Plan 2018/2021; and

·   A progress report on the Draft Regional Land Transport Plan 2021/2027.

The next RTC meeting is scheduled for 8 April.

Government Policy Statement 2021/2027

The Government Policy Statement 2021/2027 which was to be released in December 2019 will now be released to the public on 10 March 2020.  The engagement period is 11 March to 24 April 2020.

Regional Land Transport Plan and Regional Passenger Transport Plan

The compilation of the Draft Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) and the Draft Regional Passenger Transport Plan (RPRP) is on schedule.

 

Staff are in the process of securing the service of an accredited facilitator to undertake an Investment Logic Mapping (ILM) workshops to identify and agree Northlands transport related Objectives, Problems and Actions that need to be addressed.  It is planned to hold this workshop in either March or April 2020.

The ILM is a requirement of NZTA when applying for funding assistance through the National Land Transport Programme. The ILM will also serve to support a business case for transport related projects or services when national subsidy is applied for.

In addition to the above, the NZTA are re-assessing a number of their funding related policies and procedures in an effort to make the compilation and of RLTP’s and RPTP’s easier and make funding applications less onerous. Local and regional government have been kept up to date on the progress of the above.

Passenger Transport Administration

Total Mobility

Total Mobility (TM) figures are reported one month in arrears, due to the required information being unavailable at the time of the agenda deadline.

 

Total Clients

Monthly Actual Expend

Monthly Budgeted Expend

Monthly Variance

Year/Dat Actual Expend

Year/Date Budgeted Expend

Annual Variance

Jan 2020

1607

$17,171

$25,000

-$7,829

$137,641

$175,000

-$37,359

BusLink Operational Statistics

Bus Link stats for January

(revenue ex GST)

Actual

Budget

Variance

Year/Date Actual  

Year/Date Budgeted 

Year to Date Variance

City Link Passengers

21,194 

24,592

-3,398

204,671

198,808

+5,863

CityLink Revenue 

$31,987

$33,199

-$1,213

$266,542

$268,391

-$1,849

Mid North Link Passengers

149

144

5

1,225

1,074

151

Mid North Link Revenue

$561

$720

-$159

    $4,644

$5,370

-$726

Hokianga Link Passengers

 51

72

-21

389

540

-151

Hokianga Link Revenue

 $477

$939

-$462

$3,790

$7,042

-$3,252

Far North Link Passengers

408

580

-172

3,449

4,066

-617

Far North Link Revenue

$1,051

$1,598

 -$547

$8,191

$11,086

-$2,895

Bream Bay Link Passengers

57

24

33

396

150

246

Bream Bay Link Revenue

$355

$86

+$269

$2,383

$540

+$1,843

The abnormality between actual and budgeted passengers carried and farebox revenue received can be attributed to the reduced cash fares introduced during the implementation of the new electronic ticketing system.


 

ROAD SAFETY UPDATE

Regional Road Death/Serious/Minor Injury Crashes – Comparison Year to Date

 

2020

2019

 

D

S

M

D

S

M

Far North

1

11

35

3

10

34

Whangārei

2

7

27

2

13

33

Kaipara

0

3

9

0

2

8

Northland

3

21

71

5

25

75

National

41

328

1,219

5

0334

1,488

Ride Forever (R4E) Rider Training Update

One hundred and sixty-five motorcyclists have undertaken the ACC initiated R4E training courses held in Northland since 1 July 2019.  Forty riders successfully completed the Bronze Course, 93 the Silver Course and 32 the Gold Course.

Communities at Risk

At a recent Road Safety Action Planning meeting, the annual ‘Community at Risk Register’ was released.  This register compares the trend in High, Medium & Low death and injury related crashes between 2018 and 2019.   It highlights the priority issues and factors in Northland across both the State Highway and local road networks.

The ‘Evidence Based’ issues identified will be used to update the Regional Road Safety Action Plan and will result in a targeted approach to road safety initiatives by Northland’s road safety partners.

Maritime

Twelve cruise ships called to the Bay of Islands, with the run of good weather continuing. Amendments to vessel itineraries due to the corona virus outbreak are also resulting in some additional bookings being made.

Thirty incidents were received over the month of February.  Most incidents were minor in nature, with minor offenses against the bylaw, Aid to Navigation light failures and mooring related incidents.  More seriously, one collision was reported between a vessel returning to Marsden Cove Marina during hours of darkness and a moored yacht.

The NRC Maritime Operator Safety System (MOSS) underwent a periodic audit by Maritime New Zealand at the Ōpua office.  No deficiencies were found, however, points for improvement were noted and will be incorporated.  Overall the council vessels were found to be managed to a high standard.

The Maritime Department has been working through a section 17 review.  A preliminary summary of the review was received on 25 February, with the final report due by 6 March.

The regular Whangārei harbour safety meeting was also held on 25 February.

Two new Harbour Wardens have been appointed and inducted - one for Whananaki and the other for Kai Iwi lakes.  These two areas have proven to be challenging to monitor and enforce bylaws in the past.  Both wardens are already proving to be valuable support to the maritime team.

The councillors had the opportunity to visit the council vessel Waikare as part of their induction and take a tour of the Bay of Islands.  It was an opportunity to demonstrate and discuss the function of the maritime team, with members of marine biosecurity, coastal consents and planning also taking the opportunity to discuss the work being carried out in that sector.

The initial phase of the pile mooring project (40 moorings) in Kerikeri has been completed successfully.  These moorings constituted a safety hazard with the piles in a decrepit state.  Phase 2 will require further surveying prior to progressing. General feedback thus far has been very positive.

CIVIL DEFENCE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Due to high priority being given to the drought situation in the Far North region, the Northland CDEM group are unavailable to provide an update at the time this paper was due.

Council have been provided with weekly updates of the situation via document uploading to the council Hub.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 7.3

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Northland Inc. Limited: Second Quarter 2019/20 Reporting Against Statement of Intent 2019-2022

ID:

A1290452

From:

Darryl Jones, Economist and Simon Crabb, Finance Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

Council has received the second quarter report for the 2019/20 financial year from Northland Inc. Limited against the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in its Statement of Intent 2019-2022 (Attachment 1).  Staff have assessed the information provided for the 16 KPIs.  Reporting for two is not possible at this early stage (Investment recommendations are accompanied by a robust business case, and Client satisfaction score for Māori businesses).  Most are on track to be met, with one target already met for the year (Value of NZTE and Callaghan Innovation grant funding facilitated for Māori business).  A few others are behind target, but these are expected to catch-up in quarter three or four, although the impact of Covid-19 and the Australian bush fires may impact on tourism spending. 

 

The Northland Inc. financial performance for the six months to 31 December 2019 is tracking ahead of budget, with a favourable operating surplus variance of $72,880.  The forecasted year end operating surplus is $5,750 which is also favourable compared to the budgeted year-end surplus of $769.  Northland Inc’s cash position at 31 December 2019 is $556,539, which is well ahead of its December 2019 forecasted financial position of $375,002, and there appears to be no cashflow management issues for the period to 30 June 2020.

 

Representatives from Northland Inc. will attend the council meeting.

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Northland Inc. Limited: Second Quarter 2019/20 Reporting Against Statement of Intent 2019-2022’ by Darryl Jones, Economist and Simon Crabb, Finance Manager and dated 26 February 2020, be received.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Northland Inc. Limited reporting against SOI - Quarter 2 2019/20  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

03 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 7.3

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 7.4

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Legislative Compliance for the Period 1 July - 31 December 2019

ID:

A1292263

From:

Kyla Carlier, Corporate Planning Manager

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report presents the findings of council’s legislative compliance programme for the six month period 1 January – 30 June 2019.

 

Recommendation

That the report ‘Legislative Compliance for the Period 1 July - 31 December 2019’ by Kyla Carlier, Corporate Planning Manager and dated 3 March 2020, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

The Office of the Auditor-General encourages local authorities to apply a systematic process to managing the legal risks that might arise in relation to the functions and activities that they are responsible for. 

Council’s current legislative compliance framework was developed in 2011.  A comprehensive review of the programme was carried out last year in conjunction with council’s auditors (Deloitte Limited), resulting in efficient reporting processes. 

 

The current framework provides assurance for compliance with legislation that is fundamental to the council’s operations and/or poses significant potential risk:

 

·    The Local Government Act 2002

·    The Local Government (Financial Reporting and Prudence) Regulations 2014

·    The Non-financial Performance Measures Rules 2013

·    The Local Government Borrowing Act 2011

·    The Local Government (Rating) Act 2002

·    The Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

·    The Local Authorities (Member’s Interests) Act 1968

·    The Resource Management Act 1991

·    The Health and Safety at Work Act 2015

·    The Holidays Act 2003

·    The Employment Relations Act 2000

·    The Biosecurity Act 1993

·    The Building Act 2004

·    The Fire Security Act

·    The Civil Defence and Emergency Management Act 2002

·    The Land Transport Act 1998

·    The Maritime Transport Act 1994

·    The Fire and Emergency New Zealand Act 2017

 

There are several other pieces of legislation that also have relevance to council operations, but compliance is managed via other internal processes and procedures.

 

Reporting is completed six-monthly by group managers.  Reporting requires group managers to indicate compliance with the relevant legislation and identify action that has been carried out to ensure that council is aware of any new legislation or regulations.  Group managers must also sign a declaration confirming their level of compliance.

 

Reporting has been completed for the six-month period 1 July – 31 December 2019, and the results are reported here by exception.

 

Reporting indicated that compliance was achieved with all of council’s core legislation, with one exception:

·    Part compliance was achieved with the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act (LGOIMA).  Five LGOIMA requests were not processed within the statutory timeframe, which were reported to council during the period.  All other requirements were met in full.

 

No new legislation requiring consideration of implementation was reported by group managers.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Jonathan Gibbard

Title:

Group Manager - Strategy, Governance and Engagement

Date:

10 March 2020

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                         item: 8.0

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Receipt of Committee Minutes

ID:

A1292539

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager

 

Recommendation

That the unconfirmed minutes of the:

·        Investment and Property Subcommittee – 26 February 2020

be received.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Unconfirmed Investment and Property Subcommittee Minutes - 26 February 2020  

Authorised by Group Manager

Name:

Chris Taylor

Title:

Governance Support Manager

Date:

10 March 2020

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.0

17 March 2020Attachment 1

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator

  


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                          ITEM: 9.0

17 March 2020

 

TITLE:

Business with the Public Excluded

 

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider the confidential matters detailed below for the reasons given.

Recommendations

1.              That the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider confidential matters.

2.              That the general subject of the matters to be considered whilst the public is excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to this matter, and the specific grounds under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution, are as follows:

Item No.

Item Issue

Reasons/Grounds

9.1

Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - 18 February 2020

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting.

9.2

Receipt of Confidential Committee Minutes

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting.

9.3

Human Resources Report

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a).

9.4

Appointment of Northland Inc. Directors

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a).

9.5

Freeholding Industrial Area Ground Leases

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i).

9.6

Natural Hazards Request for Budget Carry Forward

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i).

3.              That the Independent Financial Advisor be permitted to stay during business with the public excluded.

Considerations

1.    Options

Not applicable. This is an administrative procedure.

2.    Significance and Engagement

This is a procedural matter required by law. Hence when assessed against council policy is deemed to be of low significance.

3.    Policy and Legislative Compliance

The report complies with the provisions to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting as detailed in sections 47 and 48 of the Local Government Official Information Act 1987.

4.    Other Considerations

Being a purely administrative matter; Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.

 



[1] Cranfield et al., 1998. Adventive marine species in New Zealand. NIWA Technical Report 34. ISSN 1174-2631; Kospartov et al. 2008. Non-indigenous and cryptogenic marine species in New Zealand – current state of knowledge: interim report. NIWA MAFBNZ Project BNZ10740.

[2] Numbers in the table are the cumulative ten-year present value of benefits and costs using a 4% discount rate. 

[3] For each management option, consideration was given to the extent to which it would reduce both the introduction and spread of marine pests in Northland.

[4] Key stakeholders include TON partnership agencies, iwi representatives, marinas and haul-out facilities, regional harbourmasters, science partners (Cawthron institute, NIWA, Universities, independent experts), boating and fishing clubs, and community groups.