Council Wednesday 28 July 2021 at 10.30am
|
|
|
|
Council Meeting
28 July 2021
Northland Regional Council Agenda
Meeting to be held in the Council Chamber
36 Water Street, Whangārei
on Wednesday 28 July 2021, commencing at 10.30am
Recommendations contained in the council agenda are NOT council decisions. Please refer to council minutes for resolutions.
RĪMITI (Item) Page
1.0 Ngā Mahi Whakapai (Housekeeping)
Key Health and Safety points to note:
· If the fire alarm goes off – exit down the stairwell to the assembly point which is the visitor carpark.
· Earthquakes – drop, cover and hold
· Visitors please make sure you have signed in at reception, and that you sign out when you leave. Please wear your name sticker.
· The toilets are on the opposite side of the stairwell.
2.0 Karakia Timatanga – Tauāki ā roto (Opening karakia)
3.0 Ngā Whakapahā (apologies)
4.0 Ngā Whakapuakanga (DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST)
5.0 Ngā Whakaae Miniti me te Mahere Mahi (Council Minutes and Action Sheet)
5.1 Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meeting 15 June 2021, Extraordinary Council Meeting 22 June 2021 and Extraordinary Council Meeting 7 July 2021 6
5.2 Receipt of Action Sheet 31
6.0 Ngā Take (Decision Making Matters)
6.1 2021 Representation Arrangements Review Initial Proposal 33
6.2 'Ngā Taumata o te Moana' - NRC Climate Change Strategy and Implementation Plan 68
6.3 Biosecurity Operational Plan 2021-2022 97
6.4 Appointment to Investment and Property Subcommittee 125
6.5 Natural and Built Environment Bill - Exposure Draft 127
6.6 CEO Recruitment - Job Description and Person Specification 131
7.0 Ngā Ripoata Mahi (Operational Reports)
7.1 Health and Safety Report 138
7.2 Chair's Report to Council 147
7.3 Chief Executive’s Report to Council 149
8.0 Receipt of Committee Minutes and Working Party/Group Updates
8.1 Receipt of Committee Minutes 178
8.2 Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings 202
9.0 Kaupapa ā Roto (Business with the Public Excluded) 204
9.1 Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - Council Meeting 15 June 2021
9.2 Receipt of Committee Confidential Minutes
9.3 Human Resources Report
9.4 Purchase of Whangārei CBD Properties
9.5 NIWA Kingfish RAS Project
ACC - Accident Compensation Corporation ALGIM - Association of Local Government Information Management AMA - Aquaculture Management Area AMP - Asset Management Plan/Activity Management Plan AP - Annual Plan BOI - Bay of Islands BOPRC - Bay of Plenty Regional Council CAPEX - Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets) CBEC - Community, Business and Environment Centre CCO – Council Controlled Organisation CCTO – Council Controlled Trading Organisation CDEM - Civil Defence Emergency Management CEEF – Chief Executives Environment Forum CEG - Co-ordinating Executive Group CEO - Chief Executive Officer CIMS - Co-ordinated Incident Management System (emergency management structure) CMA - Coastal Marine Area CPCA - Community Pest Control Areas CRI - Crown Research Institute DHB - District Health Board DOC - Department of Conservation DP – District Plan E350 – Extension 350 programme ECA - Environmental Curriculum Award ECAN - Environment Canterbury EECA - Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority EF - Environment Fund EMA - Employers and Manufacturers Association EOC - Emergency Operations Centre EPA - Environmental Protection Authority ETS - Emissions Trading Scheme FDE - Farm Dairy Effluent FNDC - Far North District Council FNHL - Far North Holdings Limited FPP - First Past the Post GE - Genetic Engineering GIS - Geographic Information System GMO - Genetically Modified Organism HBRC - Hawke's Bay Regional Council HEMP - Hapū Environmental Management Plan Horizons - Brand name of Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council HR - Human Resources HSNO - Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act HSWA - Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 IEMP - Iwi Environmental Management Plan ILGACE - Iwi and Local Government Chief Executives Forum IPPC - Invited Private Plan Change IRIS - Integrated Regional Information System KDC - Kaipara District Council KPI - Key Performance Indicator LAWA – Land, Air, Water Aotearoa LEA - Local Electoral Act 2001 LGA - Local Government Act 2002 LGNZ - Local Government New Zealand LGOIMA - Local Government Official Information & Meetings Act 1987 LIDAR – Light detection and ranging LTI – Long time injury LTP - Long Term Plan MBIE – Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment MFE - Ministry for the Environment MFL – Māori Freehold Land MHWS - Mean High Water Springs MMH - Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited MNZ - Maritime New Zealand MOH - Ministry of Health MOT - Ministry of Transport |
MPI - Ministry for Primary Industries MSD - Ministry of Social Development NCMC - National Crisis Management Centre NDHB - Northland District Health Board NEMA – National Emergency Management Agency NES - National Environmental Standards NFT – Northland Forward Together NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation NIF - Northland Intersectoral Forum NINC - Northland Inc. Limited NIWA - National Institute of Water and Atmosphere NORTEG - Northland Technical Advisory Group NPS - National Policy Statement NZCPS - New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement NZRC - New Zealand Refining Company (Marsden Point) NZTA – Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency NZTE - New Zealand Trade and Enterprise NZWWA - New Zealand Water and Wastes Association OFI - Opportunity for Improvement\ OPEX – Operating Expenditures OSH - Occupational Safety & Health OTS – Office of Treaty Settlements PCBU - Person Conducting Business or Undertaking PGF – Provincial Growth Fund PPE - Personal Protective Equipment RAP - Response Action Plan RBI - Regional Broadband Initiative RCP - Regional Coastal Plan RFI - Request for Information RFP - Request for Proposal RLTP - Regional Land Transport Plan RMA - Resource Management Act 1991 RMG - Resource Managers Group (Regional Councils) RMZ - Riparian Management Zone ROI - Return on Investment RP – Regional Plan RPMP - Regional Pest Management Plan RPMS - Regional Pest Management Strategy RPS - Regional Policy Statement RPTP – Regional Public Transport Plan RRSAP – Regional Road Safety Action Plan RSG – Regional Sector Group RSHL - Regional Software Holdings Ltd RTC - Regional Transport Committee RTO - Regional Tourism Organisation SIG – Special Interest Group SIPO - Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives SITREP - Situation Report SOE - State of Environment (or) State Owned Enterprise SOI – Statement of Intent SOLGM - Society of Local Government Managers STV - Single Transferable Vote TAG - Technical Advisory Group Tier 1 - Site level plan or response for an oil spill Tier 2 - Regional level plan or response to an oil spill Tier 3 - National level plan or response to an oil spill TLA - Territorial Local Authority – City & District Councils TON – Top of the North (regions) TTMAC – Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party TTNEAP – Tai Tokerau Northland Economic Action Plan TMP - Treasury Management Plan TOR - Terms of Reference TPK - Te Puni Kōkiri (Ministry of Maori Development) TUANZ - Telecommunications Users Association of NZ UNISA - Upper North Island Strategic Alliance WDC - Whangarei District Council WHHIF - Whangarei Harbour Health Improvement Fund WRC - Waikato Regional Council WSMP - Workplace Safety Management Practices |
![]() |
Council Meeting item: 5.1
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meeting 15 June 2021, Extraordinary Council Meeting 22 June 2021 and Extraordinary Council Meeting 7 July 2021 |
ID: |
|
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager, on 14 July 2021 |
That the minutes of the council meeting held on 15 June 2021, and the Extraordinary Council Meeting held on 22 June 2021 be confirmed as a true and correct record.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Council Meeting Minutes
15 June 2021 ⇩
Attachment 2: Extraordinary Council
Meeting Minutes 22 June 2021 ⇩
Attachment 3: Extraordinary Council
Meeting Minutes 7 July 2021 ⇩
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Receipt of Action Sheet |
ID: |
|
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager, on 12 July 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
The purpose of this report is to enable the meeting to receive the current action sheet.
That the action sheet be received.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Council Action Sheet -
July 2021 ⇩
Council Meeting item: 6.1
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
2021 Representation Arrangements Review Initial Proposal |
ID: |
|
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Ben Lee, GM - Strategy, Governance and Engagement, on 20 July 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The purpose of the report is to present the 2021 Northland Regional Council Representation Arrangements Review Initial Proposal for adoption and release for formal public consultation, in accordance with the requirements of the Local Electoral Act 2001.
1. That the report ‘2021 Representation Arrangements Review Initial Proposal’ by Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager and dated 3 June 2021, be received.
2. That in accordance with section 19I and clauses 3 and 4 Schedule 1A of the Local Electoral Act 2001, it is proposed that for at least the 2022 triennial election:
a) The Northland Regional Council comprise a total of nine (9) councillors, being seven (7) general councillors to be elected from seven (7) general constituencies (one from each), and two (2) Māori councillors elected from one (1) region-wide Māori constituency.
b) The proposed names and boundaries of the eight constituencies be as described and illustrated in the Initial Proposal (included as Attachment One pertaining to Item 6.1 of the 28 July 2021 council meeting agenda).
3. That the population that each general constituency councillor represents is within the population range 20,986 +/- 10% (18,887 – 23,084) in compliance with section 19V(2) of the Local Electoral Act 2001.
4. That the number of Maori constituency councillors complies with Schedule 1A of the Local Electoral Act 2001.
5. That the reasons for the changes to the representation arrangements for the Northland region are:
· To ensure new arrangements are in place for the 2022 local government elections following council’s decision to establish one or more Māori constituencies;
· To better reflect regional communities of interest;
· To improve effective representation; and
· To provide for fair representation in determining the number of general councillors to be elected by the electors of each general constituency, satisfying section 19V of the Local Electoral Act 2001.
6. That the Initial Proposal (included as Attachment One pertaining to Item 6.1 of the 28 July 2021 council meeting agenda or as amended at this meeting), be adopted and submitted for formal consultation commencing 10 August 2021 in accordance with the requirements of the Local Electoral Act 2001.
7. That the GM- Strategy, Governance and Engagement be authorised to make any necessary minor drafting, typographical, rounding or presentation corrections to the 2021 Northland Regional Council Representation Arrangements Review Initial Proposal prior to release for public consultation.
8. That the Representation Arrangements Review Hearings Committee be a committee of all councillors.
Due to the tight legislative timeframes of the Representation Arrangements Review, late submissions will not be accepted.
Options:
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Adopt the Initial Proposal |
· Allows council to progress the representation review process and meet the requirements and timeframes set in the Local Electoral Act 2001. |
· None apparent. |
2 |
Do no adopt the Initial Proposal |
· None apparent. The formal consultation process will allow the community to inform council’s thinking which could refine the proposal through the deliberations process. |
· A delay in progressing the representation review with a risk of council not meeting the 31 August 2021 timeframe as set in the Local Electoral Act 2001. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
Not directly applicable.
2. Community views
The one month formal consultation period will enable council to hear from the community and its views on the proposed representation arrangements.
3. Māori impact statement
There was considerable consultation and engagement with Māori in the earlier part of the representation review process when council made the decision to establish Māori seats. Furthermore, the one month formal consultation period will look to specifically engage Māori and hear their views on the proposed representation arrangements.
4. Financial implications
The representation review process was not a scheduled programme of work, and it will exceed current governance budgets. This will need to be addressed through internal savings.
5. Implementation issues
A communications strategy will be rolled out to promote and support the consultation period. This will require councillor involvement and staff resourcing.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this issue is considered to be potentially significant when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has a moderate impact on a large number of people and could generate high levels of public interest.
However, the public consultation requirements of the Local Electoral Act 2001 apply regardless. The 2021 Representation Arrangements Review Initial Proposal will be made available with a month long submission period. Council will consider all feedback on the proposal and use this to guide decision making.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The 2021 Representation Arrangement Review process and Initial Proposal have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Local Electoral Act (LEA) 2001.
The biggest risk at this time would be for council to opt for an alternate option and the ability for staff to undertake the necessary analysis in order for council to meet the statutory deadlines set out in the LEA.
Background/Tuhinga
The Representation Review 2021 Initial Proposal (included as Attachment One) provides a comprehensive explanation of the background to the representation review, the aspects of the proposal that council is seeking feedback from the community and the process going forward.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Northland Regional
Council Representation Review - Initial Proposal ⇩
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
'Ngā Taumata o te Moana' - NRC Climate Change Strategy and Implementation Plan |
ID: |
|
From: |
Matt De Boer, Climate Change Resilience Coordinator |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Jonathan Gibbard, Group Manager - Environmental Services, on 07 July 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
This report presents ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’, the proposed climate change strategy for council, as well as ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan’.
The Strategy includes a high-level vision, goals, responsibilities and prioritised action areas. It frames climate change issues in three pou: Adaptation, Emissions reduction, and Carbon removal, and outlines key responsibilities and actions. The Implementation Plan documents projects, both planned and underway, that represent the actions that will help council reach the objectives and outcomes of the Strategy.
Both documents have been developed with input, feedback and assistance from staff, council, TTMAC, MTAG and council’s Climate Change Working Party. They will be reviewed periodically, with progress to deliver projects in the Implementation Plan reported on regularly.
Staff seek council’s formal endorsement and adoption of ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ and ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan’.
1. That the report ‘'Ngā Taumata o te Moana' - NRC Climate Change Strategy and Implementation Plan’ by Matt De Boer, Climate Change Resilience Coordinator and dated 22 June 2021, be received.
2. That council adopts the documents ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ and ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan’.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Council adopts Ngā Taumata o te Moana and Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan |
Council has a clear strategic direction for NRC’s response to climate change, reducing risks associated with climate change governance and providing leadership across the region. |
There are no known disadvantages to adopting the Strategy and Implementation Plan. |
2 |
Council does not adopt Ngā Taumata o te Moana and Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan |
There are no known advantages to not adopting the Strategy and Implementation Plan. Council has already set budget to deliver the majority of projects identified in the Implementation Plan. |
Council will lack cross-council integration on climate change, resulting in ad hoc programmes and lack of strategic direction. Council fails to provide regional leadership, and lack of formal climate change programme increases organisational risk. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1 - that council adopts ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ (Attachment 1) and ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan (Attachment 2).
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
This decision will significantly increase the ability of council to proactively reduce organisational emissions, respond to the impacts of climate change and protect carbon-storing ecosystems by setting out a long-term strategy and cross-organisational work programme.
2. Community views
Staff have considered the need for public consultation on the Strategy and Implementation Plan and consider the overwhelmingly supportive feedback received in the LTP consultation as being clearly in support of council’s direction on climate change.
However, staff recommend informal engagement with district councils in Northland to facilitate ongoing collaboration and consistency between councils, but do not consider a broad community consultation process necessary.
3. Māori impact statement
Climate change is a significant issue for Māori, and has been repeatedly raised in discussions with tangata whenua. The development of a climate change strategy was identified by TTMAC as one of six strategic priorities. The delivery of ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ and ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan’ is a key step on council’s journey to ensuring a tika response to climate change, working with Māori as partners every step of the way.
During the development of the Strategy, the draft documents were presented to TTMAC on two occasions and MTAG on two occasions. Feedback from both groups was supportive and constructive. During strategy development an LTP new initiative from TTMAC (Hapū-led climate change facilitator) was successfully funded - this boosts the ability of councils to support iwi and hapū to plan for climate change.
4. Financial implications
Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ and ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan articulate a high-level direction for council work programmes, as well as defining specific projects over the coming three years.
Projects listed in the Implementation Plan represent climate change-specific projects that are being developed to complement council’s business-as-usual work programmes. Nearly all the projects have existing budgets, or Long Term Plan funding allocated.
However, there are some projects that will require additional resourcing through future Annual Plan or Long Term Plan process (two projects) or via an external funding source (four projects). Unfunded projects have only been included where we believe they form an essential component of our comprehensive approach.
It is likely that additional funds will be required in the future to implement climate change work programmes, such as investment in electric vehicles or additional staff resources. Priority projects will be proposed through council’s annual and long term planning processes, and the financial implications of these will be considered at this stage.
5. Implementation issues
Continued development of a climate change work programme, and reporting on Implementation Plan progress will likely require greater cross-council coordination. Delivery of the Implementation Plan will be monitored and reported on to the Climate Change Working Party. Future work programme development and delivery that require additional funding will be workshopped with council, and if supported progressed through future annual and long term planning processes.
The release of ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ and ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan’ provides an appropriate opportunity for council to make a public statement about council’s position and commitments regarding action on climate change. In consultation with the Chair and Chair of the Climate Change Working Party staff will prepare a media release and other associated publicity to promote the Strategy, Implementation Plan and other initiatives council is currently participating in relating to climate change. As the programme proceeds a more comprehensive communications plan will be developed in consultation with the Climate Change Working Party.
6. Significance and engagement
Climate change is an issue of significant concern to our communities. However, the development of the Strategy and Implementation Plan does not trigger council’s Significance and Engagement policy.
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan and/or is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
Climate change is a known risk multiplier, and is included in our corporate risk register. The two documents presented here are intended specifically to reduce risks to council and communities associated with climate change, including operational, strategic and political risks associated with both climate change adaptation and mitigation (carbon management).
The legislative environment around council’s climate change responsibilities is a fast-moving area of development, including recent changes to the Climate Change Response Act and the Resource Management Act are creating new obligations for regional councils, as well as the development of a new Spatial Planning Act, a Built and Natural Environment Act and a Climate Change Adaptation Act. All of these have the potential to significantly change our legal obligations in relation to climate change. Nonetheless, we have attempted to follow best practice and legal advice in developing the Strategy and Implementation Plan to ensure we have established a strong foundation for climate change response.
Background/Tuhinga
Rationale for the Strategy
Climate change is one of the most significant challenges of our generation, and has been acknowledged by council as being a key focus area for NRC.
The ongoing effects of climate change pose significant challenges to the people and natural environment in Northland. The region is likely to experience significant impacts of climate change, including increases in coastal and river flooding and erosion, drought, wildfire, pest incursions and ecosystem stresses. Māori are likely to be disproportionately affected by climate change impacts, due to both the geographic location of many Māori communities and cultural assets, and the interaction of climate impacts with existing inequities.
Climate change is largely driven by greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, and these are increasing to dangerous levels globally. This locks in future climate change that will affect generations to come. Despite investment in electric vehicles and solar panels, NRC’s carbon footprint has been increasing year on year, largely due to council’s increasing level of delivery and resourcing required to achieve this.
Although council currently undertakes a range of activities related to climate change, there has been to date no NRC policy or strategic direction to enable a coordinated and comprehensive response to adapt to the effects of climate change or to enable a consistent reduction in carbon emissions.
Process for developing the documents
In mid-2020, staff commenced the development of a climate change strategy for council. The draft documents were developed over several months, in conjunction with LTP project proposals, including discussion at the following staff and governance meetings:
· Climate Change Steering Group - staff (2020-2021)
· Climate Change Working Party (June 2020, June 2021)
· Te Taitokerau Maori and Council Working Party (July 2020, June 2021)
· Maori Technical Advisory Group (September 2020; March and June 2021)
· Executive Leadership Team (June 2021)
‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ is aligned with the goals, responsibilites, and actions available to NRC. It provides a high-level vision and strategic framework to underpin future investments in organisational capacity, recognising that a response to climate change from council must be cross-organisational. It considers the need to reduce carbon emissions and to promote the storage of carbon in our natural environment, as well as the need to enhance resilience and adaptation to the impacts of climate hazards and stressors.
‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan’ has also been developed alongside the strategy document. The Implementation Plan will coordinate climate change related activities and projects across council and ensure that council’s response is comprehensive, consistent, transparent, accountable and uses appropriate standards.
‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana Implementation Plan’ documents a total of 43 existing and planned NRC projects relating specifically to climate change across 14 NRC teams, and includes recently approved 2021–24 LTP projects. Key staff and managers were engaged during the development of LTP projects in late 2020, and to corroborate details in the Implementation Plan in early 2021. Group Managers confirmed project resourcing and timeframes, and ELT provided feedback on the documents on 3 June 2021.
Final edits and endorsement of the documents were received at the June 16 Climate Change Working Party meeting.
The Implementation Plan will be reviewed regularly, and formally updated following approval of the next LTP funding round. Reporting on the progress of projects in the implementation plan will be provided to the Climate Change Working Party, council and ELT at regular intervals.
‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ should not be confused with the Te Taitokerau Adaptation Strategy being developed by the collaborative joint staff group Climate Adaptation Te Taitokerau, which brings together the views of all four councils in Northland and is principally focussed on climate change adaptation.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Ngā Taumata o te
Moana ⇩
Attachment 2: Ngā Taumata o te
Moana Implementation plan ⇩
Council Meeting item: 6.3
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Biosecurity Operational Plan 2021-2022 |
ID: |
|
From: |
Don McKenzie, Biosecurity Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Jonathan Gibbard, Group Manager - Environmental Services, on 07 July 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The attached draft Operational Plan has been prepared as a requirement of the Biosecurity Act 1993 section 100B and should be read in conjunction with the Northland Regional Pest and Marine Pathway Management Plan 2017–2027 (hereafter referred to as the Pest Plan). It includes all species listed in the Pest Plan and describes how biosecurity programmes will be implemented during the 2021/2022 financial year.
1. That the report ‘Biosecurity Operational Plan 2021-2022’ by Don McKenzie, Biosecurity Manager and dated 25 June 2021, be received.
2. That council approve the Draft Northland Regional Pest and Marine Pathway Operational Plan 2021–2022.
3. That council authorises the GM Environmental Services to make any necessary minor drafting, typographical, rounding, or presentation corrections to the Northland Regional Pest and Marine Pathway Operational Plan 2021–2022.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Council approves the whole Operational Plan |
Implementation of the rules and activities can proceed under the revised plan. |
Nil |
2 |
Council may request amendments on the grounds that the Operational Plan is inconsistent with the Pest Plan |
Improved consistency with the Pest Plan is achieved. |
The process for their confirmation by council will cause delays in implementation. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
This decision will have no foreseeable impact on the ability of council to respond to the impacts of climate change within the following year.
2. Community views
Community views have been sought through the development of the Pest Plan and respective Long Term Plans and Annual Plans. Based on community feedback the Pest Plan and annual budgets have been set which this Biosecurity Operational Plan now implements.
3. Māori impact statement
Similarly, Māori feedback and input has been sought through the development of the Pest Plan and respective Long Term Plans and Annual Plans. Based on this feedback the Pest Plan and annual budgets have been set which this Biosecurity Operational Plan now implements. In addition, tangata whenua members of the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council sit on the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party, and have had an opportunity to provide feedback and input into this Operational Plan.
4. Financial implications
Budget for implementation is allocated as part of the current Long Term Plan and Annual Plan. Regular review of the Operational Plan will be undertaken as additional and any external funding allocations are confirmed.
5. Implementation issues
There are no known barriers to implementation of the current plan at this stage.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to Section 100B this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against the council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because the pest plan has previously been consulted on. This decision concerns its implementation and is provided for in council’s Long Term Plan and is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The Operational Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Biosecurity Act 1993, section 100B and is consistent with the Pest Plan.
Background/Tuhinga
The Northland Operational Plan aims to be a concise and accurate reflection of the content of the Pest Plan. Reviews of the Operational Plan can be undertaken during the year, and staff believe this will be important as additional government funding for activities such as kauri dieback and PF2050 become clearer and the extent of current programmes of wilding conifers are confirmed.
Section 100B of the Biosecurity Act states that the Operational Plan will be completed within three months of the end of the financial year and is now presented for council approval having been considered and endorsed by the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party in June.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Biosecurity Operational
Plan 2021-2022 ⇩
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Appointment to Investment and Property Subcommittee |
ID: |
|
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Ben Lee, GM - Strategy, Governance and Engagement, on |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
Councillor Archer was elected as the new Whangārei Urban Constituency Councillor in February 2021 as a result of a by-election to fill an extraordinary vacancy. At the June 2021 council meeting council approved that Councillor Archer be appointed:
· Deputy Chair of the Regional Transport Committee (replacing Councillor Blaikie);
· Member of the Regional Economic Development Service Delivery Working Party (replacing Councillor Kitchen);
· Member of Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (the membership being full council); and
· Chair of the Whangarei District Council/Northland Regional Council Whangārei Public Transport Working Party (replacing Councillor Blaikie as a member and taking the position of Chair in place of Councillor Stolwerk).
This report seeks council’s approval for an additional appointment for Councillor Archer to become a member of the Investment and Property Subcommittee (in addition to the current membership).
1. That the report ‘Appointment to Investment and Property Subcommittee’ by Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager and dated 2 July 2021, be received.
2. That Councillor Archer be appointed as a member of the Investment and Property Subcommittee (in addition to the current membership).
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Approve the proposed appointment |
Will provide broad councillor representation on a subcommittee that oversees an important portfolio of council. |
None apparent. |
2 |
Do not approve the proposed appointment |
None apparent. |
A lost opportunity to draw on Councillor Archer’s expertise and interest in this area of council business. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
Not applicable.
2. Community views
Not applicable.
3. Māori impact statement
Not applicable.
4. Financial implications
Not applicable
5. Implementation issues
Not applicable.
6. Significance and engagement
This is purely an administrative matter and hence deemed to be of low significance.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
Not applicable
Background/Tuhinga
Nil
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 6.5
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Natural and Built Environment Bill - Exposure Draft |
ID: |
|
From: |
Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Ben Lee, GM - Strategy, Governance and Engagement, on 20 July 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
On 29 June 2021, the Government released an exposure draft of the Natural and Built Environment Bill for consultation (the Bill). The Bill is part of the resource management system reform programme and once enacted will largely replace the Resource Management Act 1991. This version of the Bill is incomplete but provides the purpose of the Act, the structure and content of the national planning framework, regional natural and built environment plans and the role and make-up of planning committees. A further opportunity for submissions will be provided when the full Bill is presented to Parliament in early 2022.
The Environment Select Committee consultation period closes 4 August 2021. At the time of writing staff had yet to fully assess the Bill or develop a draft submission. In the event council does wish to submit, this item provides recommendations to approve a submission under delegated authority.
1. That the report ‘Natural and Built Environment Bill - Exposure Draft’ by Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and dated 5 July 2021, be received.
2. That council delegates authority to the Chair and Councillor Yeoman to authorise the lodging of a submission on the Natural and Built Environment Bill on behalf of council.
3. That council delegates authority to the Chair and Councillor Yeoman to approve the content of a submission on the Natural and Built Environment Bill, should a decision be made to lodge a submission.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Council does not lodge a submission on the Bill at this time but submits at the opportunity once the Bill is more developed. |
No staff resource required. |
The government does not receive council’s views on the initial version of the Bill. |
2 |
Staff input into submissions by others on the Bill (e.g. LGNZ) |
Council’s views are included to some degree in submissions by other parties. Minimal staff resource required. |
Council’s views may not be expressed as clearly or strongly. |
3 |
Council lodges a submission on the Bill under delegated authority |
Council’s views on the initial draft are made available to the government early in the process. |
Minor staff resource required. |
While staff have yet to assess the Bill in full and have not been able to develop a draft submission by agenda deadlines, Option 3 is recommended and the recommendations in this item provide for the lodging of a submission under delegated authority.
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
2. Community views
Communities in Northland are likely to have an interest in the matter but the council decision on whether or not to submit on the exposure draft of the Bill will not materially affect them. Communities and interested parties also have the opportunity to lodge submissions on the Bill representing their own views.
3. Māori impact statement
This report relates to a council administrative matter and therefore does not have a direct impact on Māori.
4. Financial implications
There are no financial implications associated with the decision on whether or not to lodge a submission on the Bill.
5. Implementation issues
There are no implementation issues associated with this decision.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
There are no policies or legislative compliance issues and there are no significant risks associated with the decision being made.
Background/Tuhinga
The Government released an exposure draft of the Natural and Built Environment Bill (the Bill) which will largely replace the Resource Management Act 1991. Details are available on the Parliamentary website: https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/make-a-submission/document/53SCEN_SCF_INQ_111944/inquiry-on-the-natural-and-built-environments-bill-parliamentary
This exposure draft of the Bill is incomplete but provides key provisions including the purpose of the Bill, the structure and content of the national planning framework, regional natural and built environment plans and the role and make-up of planning committees.
Key features are summarised below:
· The purpose of the Act being to enable Te Oranga o te Taiao[1] (as described) to be upheld including by the protecting and enhancing the natural environment and people and communities to use the environment in a way that supports the well-being of current generations without comprising the well-being of future generations.
· In achieving the purpose of the Act, use of the environment must meet environmental limits, stated environmental outcomes must be promoted and any adverse effects avoided, remedied, or mitigated.
· The principles of the Te Tiriti o Waitangi[2] must be given effect to while the RMA requires the Treaty principles be ‘taken into account’.
· Environmental limits are to be prescribed for air, biodiversity (including habitats and ecosystems), coastal waters, estuaries, freshwater, and soil – these limits can be quantitative or qualitative, can be expressed as a minimum biophysical standard or a maximum amount of ‘harm’. They are to be set out in the National Planning Framework (NPF) or in plans required under the Act.
· Environmental outcomes must be promoted – these include the protection, restoration and enhancement of air, ecological integrity, freshwater, coastal water estuaries and soils. Outcomes are also specified for natural character, landscapes, public access to the coast and waterbodies, the relationship of Māori with tikanga/traditions, ancestral lands, waters, sites, wāhi tapu and other taonga. In addition, greenhouse gas emissions are to be reduced and removals increased, urban areas are to be responsive to growth, housing affordability and infrastructure is to be improved and the risks of natural hazards and climate change reduced.
· The purpose, structure, and content of the National Planning Framework (NPF) is described and is to have equivalent status to regulations. The NPF is to address matters of national significance and provide integrated management of the environment through limits / targets and must be given effect to in regional plans and / or spatial strategies. It must also achieve the environmental outcomes sought in the Act.
· The purpose and content of NBA plans (one for each region) are described, and the planning committee roles, functions and membership are set out in part.
· Implementation principles including appropriate mechanisms to ensure appropriate public participation, and for effective participation by iwi and hapu, recognition and provision for the authority and responsibility of each iwi and hapu to protect and sustain the health and wellbeing of te taiao.
· A precautionary approach is applied to the setting of limits and must be applied in plans developed under the Act.
The Bill is open for submissions to the Environment Select Committee until 4 August 2021. At the time of writing, staff have yet to fully assess the Bill or develop a draft submission. In the event council determines a submission should be lodged, delegated authority is sought to approve the draft prior to lodgement. It is recommended that authority to approve the draft be delegated to Chair Penny Smart and Councillor Yeoman – Chair of the Planning and Regulatory Working Party.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 6.6
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
CEO Recruitment - Job Description and Person Specification |
ID: |
|
From: |
Beryl Steele, Human Resources Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 19 July 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The CEO Recruitment Subcommittee and Advisors have updated the current CEO job description and person specification for use during the recruitment process for the next CEO. This now needs approval by council.
1. That the report ‘CEO Recruitment - Job Description and Person Specification’ by Beryl Steele, Human Resources Manager and dated 12 July 2021, be received.
2. That the job description and person specification be approved.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Adopt the job description and person specification |
The subcommittee and advisors will be able to continue with the recruitment process. |
Nil |
2 |
Do not adopt the job description and person specification |
Nil |
That the subcommittee and advisors will need to review the job description and person specification and delay the recruitment process. |
3 |
Adopt the job description and person specification with minor agreed changes that do not need to come back to council for further approval |
After refinement of the job description and person specification the subcommittee and advisors can keep moving with the recruitment process. |
Nil |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
Nil
2. Community views
Community views on this matter are unknown, however being an administrative matter, this is likely to not have a significant impact on the community.
3. Māori impact statement
A representative from TTMAC is one of the advisors and has had input into the job description and person specification.
4. Financial implications
Financial impacts are any chargeable time for the advisors to the subcommittee and at the next phase of the process as it relates to the recruitment agency taken on to assist in the recruitment of a Chief Executive Officer.
5. Implementation issues
At this stage there are no implementation issues envisaged.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is an administrative matter that clarifies existing processes and formalises these in a policy.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The Local Government Act and Human Rights Act apply to the job description and person specification. The job description and person specification comply with both.
Background/Tuhinga
The current Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement expires on 30 September 2022. In order to find a suitable replacement, the council needs to start the process now, and as part of that process the Subcommittee needs to have an approved job description and person specification.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: CEO Job Description and
Person Specification July 2021 ⇩
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Health and Safety Report |
ID: |
|
From: |
Kelcie Mills, Health and Safety Advisor |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 19 July 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
This report is to inform the council of the activity in health and safety for the month of June 2021, and a review of the 2020–2021 financial year. An overview/summary of the activities include:
· 97% of the annual review and systems audit for health and safety was completed.
· There was an increase in the risk scores for operating pumps, a water quality sampling site, and dealing with aggressive people – psychological harm.
· There are 87 health and safety risks, 10 of which are high risk.
· There was no change in the number of injury/incident events, and a decrease in hazard related events reported.
· There were 132 health and safety events reported in the last 12 months. Of those, none were severe or catastrophic.
· The health and safety strategy is with the Health and Safety Committee for approval.
· Training completed: outdoor first aid, and health and safety contractor management.
That the report ‘Health and Safety Report’ by Kelcie Mills, Health and Safety Advisor and dated 28 June 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
As it is the end of the 2020–2021 financial year, this report will show an in depth review of this year’s health and safety performance and identify some of the areas for improvement for next year.
1. Health and safety performance
Summary of the health and safety performance detailed in table 1 (below):
· The annual review is at 97% completion. The reason it is not fully complete is due to the new health and safety strategy that is yet to be approved, and the personal protective equipment (PPE) review, which is being finalised with the Marketing and Engagement Team. This is expected to be completed by the end of the month.
· The number of inductions completed has slightly increased. However, there is still work to do to make this 100% and we will continue to follow up on any incomplete inductions with health and safety representatives. This is expected to be 100% by the end of next month.
· The overall number of pre-engaged contractors is low. This may represent a breakdown in the system, as H&S is not kept in the loop of completed pre-engagements. However, 31 contract managers have been trained on the process this year. With the new central vendor area in SharePoint and upcoming procurement and contract training (which is in development), it will be much easier to track pre-engagements and follow up with contract managers.
Table 1: Health and safety performance lead and lag indicators
*Based on calendar year
See attachment 1 for the full financial year lead and lag indicators table.
2. Risk management
Figure 1: Heat map of Health and Safety Risks in Promapp
Figure 1 demonstrates the inherent and residual risk scores for all health and safety risks. There are 87 risks in total, 10 of which are classed as high risk (these are listed below).
To elaborate on the heat maps, each risk which is placed on the same area of the map increases the number. This means that where numbers 2 through to 14 are indicated on the maps, there are between 2 and 14 risks which all have identical risk scores. The risk score is established by identifying the likelihood and consequence. For example, where the ‘14’ risks are placed on the inherent risks heatmap, those 14 risks have a likelihood of 4 and a consequence of 4.
The residual risks heatmap shows the change in risk scores after controls are in place, which is why they show more towards the green. The 10 risks still in the red are councils’ top risks. The comparison in heat maps demonstrate how well the risks are being controlled in the organisation, with a large proportion of the risks being mitigated and moving from high and moderate, to low risk.
The 10 current top risks are:
2. Dealing with aggressive people – psychological harm
3. Extended workload/stress
4. Workplace bullying and harassment
5. Working with contractors
6. Driving motor vehicles – accident and injury related
7. Slips, trips and falls
8. Sedentary work – ergonomic harm
9. Working under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol
10. Sampling at the Tangiteroria water quality site.
Note: Operating pumps and dealing with aggressive people – psychological harm have both had an increase in risk score. They have moved to the 1st and 2nd highest risks. As a result of these increases, extended workload/stress has moved into 3rd and the rest of the top risks have bumped down rankings.
Risk updates
· Operating pumps was reviewed, and it was identified that the weight of the pump is too heavy for two people to safely lift above shoulder height (which is required to get the pump onto a boat). A hoist is going to be installed to resolve this. However, it will remain a high-risk hazard until this is completed.
· Dealing with aggressive people was reviewed in June and has been split into two hazards: one for psychological harm, and one for physical harm. Each has different controls related to building security, team debriefs and support. As a result, the residual risk score for psychological harm has increased and the score for physical harm has decreased.
· Extended workload/stress remains a top risk. Even though it has moved into 3rd place, its risk profile has not changed or decreased.
· A new hazard was reported at the Tangiteroria water quality sampling site. It was identified that this site is too dangerous for sampling at any tide level and has been discontinued.
· Workplace bullying and harassment was reviewed, and it was identified that the residual risk score was too low due to the potential for reported instances of bullying to result in time off work, or restricted work. It has therefore been increased. This was a result of the annual review and is not due to any sudden increase in reports. To better mitigate this risk, the new trainer is working on resilience and psychological safety.
3. Injuries, incidents, and hazards
Figure 2: Number of hazard and injury related events for previous 12 months
Figure 1 shows no change in injury/incident related events, and a decrease in hazard related events reported in June. The event data over the past 12 months has remained steady. March 2021 was the highest reporting month for injuries/incidents, and both July and May had the highest months of hazards reported.
As seen in table 2, the risk profile for the reports also remains similar to last financial year. There have been no severe/catastrophic events which demonstrates that the acceptable level of risk is being met.
Table 2: Reported events by risk profile.
Events reported
Figure 3: Top event types for previous 12 months
Events of interest
· A contractor had a WorkSafe notifiable event. The worker hit powerlines with a boom lift (machine) which they had not lowered enough to safely move under the lines. It resulted in no injuries or harm, however, it did cause a power outage to one house on the street. The worker had been rushing as they were under time pressure to finish a task that day. All the correct site safety planning and close approach permits had been completed. The contract manager investigated the site and has since been working with the contractors on their safety culture to ensure that they feel comfortable to raise time pressures and other concerns to ensure they get addressed.
· The same contractor mentioned above experienced two other hazard related events. The first was members of the public entering the site and causing machinery damage and syphoning diesel. In this instance, they moved the machinery further onto the site, so it is not in direct sight of the road. The second was an aggressive member of the public holding up the project. To mitigate this, they involved Far North District Council, as it is on their land, and the Police to help deal with the person.
· There was a minor vehicle incident involving a worker damaging a garage door when backing in a vehicle. The team is working with the fleet coordinator on how they better back the vehicles in.
4. End of financial year review
Table 3: Injury/incident and hazard events reported by type.
Table 3 shows the in-depth event data over the past four financial years. This year is our first reported Worksafe notifiable event. However, as described above it was a contractor, not NRC directly, and therefore does not sit on our business profile.
Figure 4: Trend of reported hazard and injury/incident related events 2017 – 2021
Figure 4 outlines the trend of events reported over the past four financial years. There were 132 events reported this financial year, which is 10 higher than the 122 in 2019-2020. A goal for next year is to see the number of hazards reported (including near misses) be higher than injury/incidents.
Figure 5: Number of reported injuries and diseases reported in 2020-2021
Figure 5 outlines the reported events which resulted in injury or disease. Strains or sprains had the most reports with 16 events. This is reflective of ergonomic stress events being the second highest report type, as well as manual handling events being in the top 10. An identified area of improvement is finding a preventative workplace initiative for sprains and strains, as well as the better management and assessment of ergonomics.
There is no comparative data from 2019-2020. This is a result of COVID and the lock down period resulting in less than half the number of injuries or diseases reported. However, sprains and strains was also the highest reported injury type last year, with five reports.
Figure 6: Reported H&S events by group for 2020-2021
Figure 6 shows the reported events by group. Regulatory Services reported the most events. However, this includes many near misses and hazards that their three health and safety representatives proactively identified and reported. It is not surprising that Regulatory Services and Environmental Services are both the highest reporters as they represent most of the field staff in the business.
When splitting the injury/incident and hazard data separately, the percentage of reporting for each group was almost identical.
5. Health and safety strategy work programme
Leadership
· The health and safety representatives have been actively involved in reviewing risks throughout June.
Communication and engagement
· The health and safety spotlight for June focused on the new monitoring platform for the Garmin InReach devices, and the wellbeing fitness challenge.
Wellbeing
· The wellbeing committee has been planning a winter warmer fitness challenge to take place in July. They have further been planning to use some of the wall space in the canteen to demonstrate our people’s diversity using a world map.
· The wellbeing committee also completed a plan for the next financial year which has mapped out activities areas to focus on.
Learning and development
· Training completed this month included outdoor first aid and health and safety contractor management. A new training calendar will be designed for the new financial year.
Continual improvement
· The reviewed Health and Safety Strategy is currently with the Health and Safety Committee and is ready for approval at the upcoming July meeting. Once approved, a new action plan will be developed.
6. Legislation updates
Nil.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Health and safety
performance lead and lag indicators ⇩
Council Meeting item: 7.2
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Chair's Report to Council |
ID: |
|
From: |
Penny Smart, Chair |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Penny Smart, Chair, on 14 July 2021 |
Purpose of Report
This report is to receive information from the Chair on meetings/events attended, and correspondence sent for the month of June 2021.
That the report ‘Chair's Report to Council’ by Penny Smart, Chair and dated 2 July 2021, be received.
Meetings/events attended
During this period, I attended the following meetings/events/functions:
· Meetings attended with the council’s CEO, Malcolm Nicolson:
o Three Waters Zoom meetings for Mayors, Chairs and CEOs.
o Meeting with Alan McKenzie, MPI, following initial meeting with staff – Kauri Dieback.
o Meeting with Marsden Maritime Holdings Directors Benoit Marcenac and Mark Bogle – MMH director nominations. Deputy CEO, Bruce Howse, also attended.
o Zoom meeting with Deputy Chair Justin Blaikie, Ben Tomason and Barry Trass - Oruku.
· Future for Local Government Review Panel hui with Tai Tokerau Elected Members. Deputy CEO, Bruce Howse, attended in place of the CEO, Malcolm Nicolson.
· Regular Mayors and Chair catch up meetings.
· Meeting with Minister Robertson. Deputy CEO, Bruce Howse, attended in place of the CEO, Malcolm Nicolson.
· Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee meeting.
· NZAGRC Future Farm Systems scoping workshop via zoom.
· Northport visit.
Correspondence
During June I sent out the following correspondence:
Date |
Addressed To |
Subject |
01.06.21 |
Hon Michael Wood Minister of Transport |
Follow up letter following visit to NRC by Minister Wood. |
01.06.21 |
John Levers |
Complaint by John Levers to Serious Fraud Office. |
14.06.21 |
Benoit Marcenac and Mark Bogle Directors Marsden Maritime Holdings
|
MMH Directors |
16.06.21 |
Shaun Clarke and Andy Finch Far North District Council |
Request for FNDC to establish a wastewater committee for Otiria-Moerewa. |
18.06.21 |
Maxine Shortland Grant Conaghan Dr Derek Gibbons Ian Leigh-Mackenzie Murray Bain Dr Benjamin Pittman Noma Shepherd |
Queen’s Birthday Honours |
22.06.21 |
Hon Grant Robertson Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Infrastructure |
Meeting with NRC, Northland Inc. and Whangarei District Council 11 June 2021. |
29.06.21 |
Nicole Anderson Chair Northland Inc. |
Letter of congratulations to Nicole Anderson on appointment as Chair of Northland Inc. |
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 7.3
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Chief Executive’s Report to Council |
ID: |
|
From: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer, on 19 July 2021 |
That the report ‘Chief Executive’s Report to Council’ by Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer and dated 30 June 2021, be received.
7.3.1 Highlights
Northland Transport Alliance Fifth Anniversary
Five years ago, on 1 July 2016, the Northland Transportation Alliance (NTA) was established. This provided a new and innovative approach to delivering Northland's transportation programmes through a collaboration between local government (Far North, Kaipara and Whangārei District Councils along with Northland Regional Council) and Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (NZTA).
I want to acknowledge the mahi and thank everyone involved with NTA and Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) over the past five years. Anniversaries allow us to look back, reflect and celebrate the successes achieved and delivered by the NTA. Some of the NTA's highlights include:
The development of the Regional Strategies from the Sealed Road Strategy to the Bridge Strategy.
Improving the reach of the public transport network. This includes a new link – Bream Bay – in 2019 and two new links in 2020 – The Hikurangi Link and the Whangārei Link.
The introduction of the Bee Card, making bus travel throughout Whangārei easier.
In the years 2020/21, Total Mobility kept 1,316 people connected to their community.
Developing and delivering the Regional Capital Forward Works programme. The 2020/21 Capital Works projects delivered through the NTA this past year valued at approximately $70m across the region, including over $15m of newly introduced Central Government Funded (PGF, CIP, Worker Redeployment) projects.
Partnerships with Northland Road Safety and the Far North REAP implemented the Road to Zero strategy across Northland communities, incorporating a safe system approach that targets safe roads, safe speeds, safe vehicles and safe road use.
Mangakahia Road was reclassified as a State Highway (SH15) and became the Inland Freight Route, this ensures three vital routes connecting Northland.
To further celebrate this milestone, the NTA produced a Special 5th Anniversary Edition of the Mahi Tahi Newsletter. The newsletter is an opportunity to read more about the NTA's key achievements over the past five years.
7.3.2 CEO’s Office
Department |
Description |
Status |
Consent decision appeal |
Two separate consent applications for replacement and new consents relating to a proposed expansion of, Doug’s Ōpua Boat Yard in Walls Bay, Ōpua |
Applicant has applied to the court to progress the appeals but has been advised that court caseload prevents progress at this time. |
Economics - REL |
Worked with lawyers to continue pursuing settlement/bankruptcy arrangements in relation to Maher Jammal. |
Waiting for response from Maher Jammal. |
7.3.3 Corporate SERVICES
Regional Software Holdings Limited
The Draft Statement of Intent (SOI) for 2022-24 was tabled at the April council meeting. The finalised SOI was adopted by the board of RSHL at the 24 June board meeting. The final version has a single material change from the draft. Section 4 now reads: “4 Ratio of Consolidated Shareholder’s Funds to Total Assets”
It is intended that for the 2021-22 financial year the proportion of equity to total assets be in excess of 60%. The board will re-evaluate this guideline as part of the debt and funding strategy for IRIS NextGen. A new guideline will be included in the 2022 Statement of Intent.
The adopted SOI will be published on the Councils website.
Finance
The Finance team are currently working towards completing the 2020/21 year-end draft accounts for audit review, hence there is no financial report included in the July 2021 council agenda. These draft annual accounts will be presented to the August council meeting. Deloitte will be onsite from 23 August until early September completing their review of the final accounts, which are set to be given audit clearance and be adopted by council at the council meeting on 19 October 2021.
In preparing for the financial year end, the CEO, in line with his delegation, approved the write-off of the following debt:
Council Property Update
The Kaipara Service Centre is on budget and eight days ahead of schedule, despite the weather impacting productive site days.
The Kensington Crossing sale has gone unconditional.
The sale of three significant and adjacent Union East Street properties has settled.
7.3.4 Regulatory Services
During June 2021, a total of 77 decisions were issued. These decisions comprised:
Moorings |
3 |
|
Land Use Consents |
17 |
Coastal Permits |
30 |
|
Water Permits |
5 |
Land Discharge Permits |
2 |
|
Bore Consents |
17 |
Water Discharge Permits |
3 |
|
|
|
The processing timeframes for the June 2021 consents ranged from:
1641 to 5 calendar days, with the median time being 31 days;
1068 to 2 working days, with the median time being 20 days.
Fifty-eight applications were received in June 2021.
Of the 110 applications in progress at the end of June 2021:
Forty-seven were received more than 12 months ago (most awaiting further information from the applicant), with the following reasons:
Group of groundwater take consents (Aupōuri) in process of being determined |
24 |
Awaiting additional information (including CIAs) |
8 |
Granted recently or about to be granted |
2 |
Consultation with affected parties/stakeholders |
4 |
On-hold pending new rules becoming operative |
5 |
Other |
4 |
Nine were received between 6 and 12 months ago (most awaiting further information from the applicant);
Fifty-four less than 6 months.
Appointment of Hearing Commissioners
No commissioners were appointed in June 2021.
Consents Decisions and Progress on Notified Applications in Process, Objections and Appeals
The current level of notified application processing activities at the end of June 2021 is (by number):
Applications Publicly/Limited Notified During Previous Month |
0 |
Progress on Applications Previously Notified |
2 |
Hearings and Decisions |
1 |
Appeals/Objections |
1 |
Coastal/Water Quality Operations
All routine water quality and ecological programmes were undertaken in June, including:
Monthly sampling runs (coastal and freshwater water quality, periphyton, cyanobacteria)
Monthly validations of all continuous monitoring stations.
As per our quality systems, annual process reviews were undertaken for our core State of the Environment (SOE) monitoring programmes and associated processes. These reviews ensure that our programmes continue to be undertaken in a consistent and professional manner, ensuring high quality data is collected.
NATURAL RESOURCES DATA
The NR Data team has now joined the Service Desk system to capture data issues, corrections, etc.
LAWA Water Annual Refresh: Details of the request were provided to councils in May 2021. A number of data checks and analyses need to be completed by September 2021, ready to go-live for World Rivers Day. The updates to the Air Quality and Land Cover topics are now available on the LAWA production/public site (www.lawa.org.nz)
The
new environmental data portal for the NRC website is well underway and the
expected
Go Live is now delayed to July 2021. Testing with external customers will start
in July 2021. The data will be brought online over two phases:
Phase 1: rainfall, water level, water quality, drought and coastal, wind and wave data.
Phase 2: biological data for periphyton, fish, macroinvertebrates and cyanobacteria.
The electronic data collection form is now developed to collect hydrology data and will be operational in 6-8 weeks, once the testing phase is completed.
HYDROLOGY
Hydrology Projects
Soil moisture sensors have been installed at rain gauge stations at Ngataki, Mangakawakawa, Ohaeawai, Ruatangata West, Otaika, and Poutō Peninsula as part of the 2018 LTP new initiative. These sensors measure soil moisture at 200mm intervals from the surface to 1.2m depth and are used to extend our understanding of drought conditions in various geologies beyond the existing NIWA climate stations. A further five sensors will be installed in 2021 and 2022.
Dataloggers were upgraded at Mangaharuru at County Weir, Waitangi at Waimate North Road and Whakapara at Puhipuhi (dual comms for key flood warning site).
Levelling to Mean Sea Level has been carried out by Cato Bolam consultants at 50 groundwater bores and 16 lakes. Each station has a reference point that water level is checked against each site visit; it is the reference point that has been surveyed. Setting the data to Mean Sea Level helps with data analysis and modelling.
Rainfall June 2021 rainfall was near normal or slightly above normal in most locations and significantly above normal in the Bay of Islands area (209% at Waitangi McDonald Road) and the eastern hills north of Whangārei (187% at Puhipuhi). The exceptions to the general wet conditions, were at Poutō Peninsula and Ruawai where rainfall totals for the month were around half of typical rainfall. Around half of the month’s rainfall fell during a severe weather event from 7 to 8 June 2021, which mainly affected the areas with high rainfall figures mentioned above. There was no significant flooding during this event. |
|
|
River Flows River flows for June are characterised as “Normal” or “Above Normal’ at most stations (particularly north of Whangārei) as a result of the above normal rainfall throughout most of the region. This is an improvement on the “Below Normal” river flows observed last month. The Kaihū River remains low for this time of year due to the prevailing north-easterly weather events. |
Groundwater Groundwater levels have improved from last month, with groundwater systems in the Far North recording levels “Normal” or “Above Normal”. Porotī and Mangawhai remain “Low” but have improved from their “Very Low” status last month.
|
Area |
Status (June 2021) |
Aupōuri |
Above Normal |
|
Taipā |
Normal |
|
Russell |
Above Normal |
|
Kaikohe |
Above Normal |
|
Whangārei |
Below Normal |
|
Marsden-Ruakākā |
Normal |
|
Porotī |
Low |
|
Mangawhai |
Low |
|
Ruawai |
Normal |
NATURAL RESOURCES SCIENCE
Air quality and carbon emission
Ambient PM10 monitoring results for May 2021 for the Robert Street, Mairtown (Whangārei airshed) and Ruakākā (Marsden Point airshed) stations showed compliance with the National Environmental Standards (NES) for Air Quality.
Ambient PM2.5 monitoring results for the Robert Street, Whangārei for May 2021 were within the Ambient Air Quality Guideline value.
Work on Monitoring Network Review Stage 2 continues for air quality. Staff are working with Pattle Delamore Partners to develop PM10 and PM2.5 inventories for the Whangārei and Kaitāia airsheds and a draft report is expected soon.
Council’s CO2-e (carbon dioxide equivalent) monthly emissions in 2020 and 2021 are presented in the graph below. In April and May 2021, council’s CO2-e emission increased by 25.61 and 16.01 tonnes respectively, compared with emissions in April and May 2020. This is attributed to the Level 4 and 3 COVID-19 restrictions/lockdown in April and May 2020. The graph is based on live data and therefore figures for the last few months are subject to change.
COASTAL
Council received the results from
the Te Taitokerau/Northland coastal microplastic study. In 2020, council
staff together with iwi and hāpu collected sand samples from 11 beaches in
the Northland Region, as part of a national research project to determine the
impact of microplastics in
New Zealand.
Large and small microplastics were found at all 11 beaches sampled. No overall difference in levels was observed between summer and winter and no difference was found between the West Coast and East Coast of Northland. Levels were generally lower than at sites previously sampled around Tāmaki Makaurau/Auckland. Dr Olga Pantos from ESR will present the full findings to a council workshop on 7 July 2021.
FRESHWATER ECOLOGY AND QUALITY
The monitoring site representativeness report contracted through Cawthron Institute was received and reviewed as part of Stage 2 of the environmental monitoring networks review. Overall, it was concluded that the proposed monitoring network is “fit for purpose” to report on NPS-FM attributes related to the Ecosystem Health compulsory value. As per the recommendations from the Cawthron report, the council will implement periphyton monitoring in the Bream Bay and Aupōuri areas and fish monitoring in the Whangaroa area.
Council staff attended a workshop organised by the Department of Conservation on fish passage.
Monitoring Network Review
As part of Stage 2 of this project, the external review work (provider - Land and Water Science) on the representativeness of the proposed river water quality monitoring network with respect to landscape and landcover controls over the water quality process has been finalised.
The report concluded that the proposed river monitoring network with the additional 12 new sites fairly represents the variability in geology, physiographic settings and land cover across the 13 FMUs. However, there is still room for improvement in the west and far north FMUs (e.g. Aupōuri, Awanui, Herekino-Whāngāpē, Whangaroa).
Other recommendations include:
Testing of additional non-conventional water chemistry related to signatures of physiographic gradients (e.g. chloride, potassium, sodium, dissolved iron, dissolved organic carbon and dissolved reactive silica);
Event flow monitoring to capture “extreme events”; and
Integration of flow and groundwater monitoring, together with river water quality.
Groundwater
Stage 2 of network review has been completed and monitoring programmes drafted.
Geochemical analysis of SOE and NGMP (National Groundwater Monitoring Programme) sample sites is being undertaken. This process classifies aquifers into water types and indicates water characteristics such as age or origin.
Aupōuri aquifer model update and scenarios have now been completed and are currently under review.
Water Quality Modelling
NR Science staff have worked with the Planning & Policy and Land teams to help NIWA finalise the CLUES scenarios model to estimate the change in nitrogen, phosphorous, E.coli and sediment loads by applying various future land mitigation options. The final report together with the GIS outputs from CLUES scenarios model have been received, which are being examined in detail by the project team.
Below is a summary of the current Envirolink projects relevant to the NR Science team:
Ecosystem metabolism for Northland Rivers based on continuous dissolved oxygen (DO) – a report and guidance document together with a data analysis automation tool (using R codes) will be available by the end of July 2021.
NEMS supplementary guidance on surrogate technologies for river suspended sediment load.
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of riverine flow management under NPS-FM, which will provide a framework for effective and efficient M&E of instream ecological response to riverine flow management by regional councils.
COMPLIANCE MONITORING
The results of compliance monitoring for the period 1 - 30 June 2021 (and year-to-date figures) are summarised in the following table and discussed below.
Classification |
Total |
Full compliance |
Low risk non-compliance |
Moderate non-compliance |
Significant non-compliance |
Not exercised during period |
Air Discharge |
49 |
41 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Bore Consent |
9 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Coastal Air Discharge |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Coastal Discharge |
40 |
27 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
Coastal Permit |
148 |
127 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
15 |
Land Discharge |
220 |
134 |
26 |
6 |
3 |
51 |
Land Use Consent |
150 |
64 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
75 |
Water Discharge |
117 |
69 |
13 |
12 |
2 |
21 |
Water Permit |
122 |
70 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
47 |
Water Take |
159 |
96 |
39 |
17 |
0 |
7 |
Total |
1016 |
637 |
101 |
48 |
5 |
225 |
Percentage |
|
62.7% |
9.9% |
4.7% |
0.5% |
22.1% |
Year to date |
6352 |
4333 |
824 |
487 |
153 |
555 |
Percentage |
|
68.2% |
13.0% |
7.7% |
2.4% |
8.7% |
Coastal
The majority of consents monitored during the reporting period related to coastal discharges (treated municipal sewage, stormwater and wastewater from boat maintenance facilities and industrial sites) and coastal structures. Following an earlier incident and enforcement, where earthworks was undertaken within a coastal wetland including construction of a reclamation, the successful remediation of the wetland was completed. This included the removal of the reclamation, remediation plan, and replanting of the affected area. |
|
Water, Waste, Air and Land Use (WWALU) Compliance Monitoring
Contaminated Land Management
Four incidents involving the discharge of hazardous substances and 10 enquiries regarding contaminated land were received and responded to. 522kg of hazardous waste was disposed of.
Environmental Incidents
There were no environmental incidents reported in June which resulted in a significant environmental impact.
ENFORCEMENT
Abatement Notices, Infringement Notices and Formal Warnings
The following enforcement actions were taken during the period:
Nature of Offence |
Infringement Notice |
Abatement Notice |
TOTAL * |
|||
No. Offences |
No. Notices |
No. Offences |
No. Notices |
No. Offences |
No. Notices |
|
Burning and smoke nuisance |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
Earthworks/land use |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Illegal use of lakebed or riverbed |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Other air discharge |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
Sewage** |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
TOTAL |
1 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
8 |
14 |
*An infringement notice and an abatement notice may be issued for the same offence. This means that in the above table, Column 5 (Total No. Offences) is not necessarily the sum of Column 1 (Infringement Notice No. Offences) + Column 3 (Abatement Notice No. Offences).
**1 municipal, 1 communal and 1 commercial (campground) discharge
Other Enforcement
Earthworks without erosion and sediment controls – Tōtara North
Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 20 July 2020 against an individual for earthworks undertaken without controls, and work within a watercourse and the riparian management zone. The defendant plead not guilty. A hearing was scheduled for 22-24 June 2021 which did not proceed due to the defendant being ill. The case was adjourned until the week of 2 August 2021.
Open burning on industrial/trade property – Whangārei
Charges were laid in the Whangārei District Court on 27 November 2020 against an individual for open burning on industrial/trade premises; the burnt items also included prohibited items. There are two charges against the individual who plead a not guilty plea on 30 April 2021. A case review hearing was completed on 22 June 2021 and the case was set down for hearing on the 6-7 September 2021.
Farm dairy effluent – Tāheke
Charges were laid in the Kaikohe District Court on 30 March 2021 against a farm owner and his company for offences which occurred in August 2020. There are two charges against the company and one against the farm owner. The farm has a poor history of compliance with regional rules for animal effluent disposal. Disclosure was provided to the defence lawyers on 23 April 2021. A not guilty plea was entered on 23 June 2021. A case review hearing has been scheduled for 2 August 2021.
Farm dairy effluent – Parapara
Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 6 May 2021 against a farm owner for offences which occurred in August 2020. There are four charges against the farm owner. The first court appearance has been set down for 9 July 2021.
7.3.5 Environmental Services
Sustainable Hill Country and Regional Priorities
Milestones |
Status |
Farm Environment Plans (FEPs) |
Over the last 6 months a temporary reporting measure (Site Visit Records) is in place while negotiations for an alternative deliverable to FEPs continue. Site Visit Records bullet point the date of the site visit, land management issues observed, recommendations, and outcome such as environment fund application, planting plan or soil conservation plan. The target of 83 was reached with 86 Site Visit Records completed covering 20,507 hectares of land. |
Stakeholder engagement |
Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research have been commissioned to extract and analyse tree planting data for Northland form the 2019 Survey of Rural Decision-Makers. A report will include information on demographics, economics, land use, adoption, climate change. The report will be utilised to help develop a multi-stakeholder promotional plan with our communications team to increase tree planting as part of a wider soil conservation strategy. |
Land treatments – Retirement fencing |
Good progress this year with 28.6 km of new fencing that retired 194 ha of eroding pastureland. The 71 ha target was exceeded by 123 ha. Despite the increase in hectarage, there was an underspend of $55,100. |
Objective |
Status |
Harvest |
Orders have closed for the year with orders totalling 4,914 poplar and willow poles. Harvest and delivery are underway. Demand for poles needs to increase in order to meet future planting targets. The promotional plan mentioned above will help in this regard. |
Environment Fund Progress
The environment fund projects have been all signed off for the financial year. A total of 87 projects were completed with a total spend of $522,250. This included $38,766 on CoastCare, $40,000 for catchment groups and $40,000 on Upper Hātea projects. A further 15 projects withdrew from their funding totalling $94,005.
A full reconciliation breakdown of the environment expenditure will be available in next month’s report.
The project is progressing well. Progress to date the following includes:
7.6 km of riparian fencing completed.
A further 1.2 km of riparian fencing scheduled to be completed early in the new financial year.
1.3 km2 of riparian planting to be completed by the end of the financial year.
A further 663 m2 of riparian planting planned for early in the new financial year.
The project’s Million Metres fundraising site has raised $6,280.
A press release with case study of a completed site is planned to maintain interest from landowners as we go into the winter.
Both the Ministry for the Environment and Million Metres are planning videos to highlight their projects which should also help keep landowner interest high.
Waimā Waitai Waiora Partnership
The partnership project is now in its final year. It is moving into the busy season to plant 100,000 plants over the next few months.
Sixteen new projects for fencing and planting within the Northern Wairoa catchment and tributaries are planned over the next few months.
Million Metres have raised $3,146 for the project since May 2021, and efforts will continue with ongoing videos to highlight the project.
BIODIVERSITY
Objective |
Status |
Aquatic weed and pest fish control |
Aquatic weed control Pest fish and grass
carp |
Sediment and nutrient mitigation |
Sediment mitigation swales, sediment traps and a wetland area are complete at Lakes Ngatu and Rotokawau. A planting day was held on 22 June with 180 pupils and supporters from Paparore School planting 1,600 wetland plants beside the lake. |
Education Days |
Two dune lake events have recently been held: · Black Lake (Kai Iwi Group) – 25 May with 50 students from 3 schools. · Lake Humuhumu (Poutō) – 4 June with 77 students from 2 schools. Students planted plants provided by the Poutō Catchment Group. |
Students and community at ‘Get to know your dune lake day’ at Lake Humuhumu on 4 June
Roadside swale and sediment traps at Lake Ngatu (designed to reduce sediment and nutrients entering the lake |
|
|
CoastCare
The CoastCare planting season is underway with planting so far at Ruakākā, Whananaki and Karikari Peninsula.
Over 2,000 mid-dune and foredune plants provided by council’s CoastCare have been planted on the dunes south of Ruakākā river mouth by Bream Bay Coastal Care Trust and Whangārei District Council with help from Pompallier Catholic College, Victory House, and council staff.
This area is covered by a weed management plan commissioned by council last year. Weed control, as per the recommendations of the plan, has been undertaken by Bream Bay Coastal Care Trust and Whangarei District Council contractors.
|
|
|
L to R: Renew School planting by Ruakākā dune lake; planting with Haiti-tai-marangai marae at Puwheke, Karikari Peninsula; Pompallier Catholic College students helping with planting in Ruakākā Wildlife Refuge. |
BIOSECURITY
There was a confirmed sighting with night thermal surveillance of nine red deer on the Mangonui river reserve (Department of Conservation, Kauri Coast). These are thought to be remnants of a mass escape from a deer farm in the area in 2019. Access is being sought with the Department of Conservation to allow Biosecurity staff access to control the animals.
Further possible sightings of deer on a property in Mārua have been reported and landowner access is being sought for further surveillance of the area.
kauri PROTECTION
Tākou Kauri Sanctuary technical advisory group (TAG)
Biosecurity staff have been invited by Ngāti Rēhia to be part of a technical advisory group for the Kauri Sanctuary at Tākou Bay. The advisory group consists of experts from the Ministry for Primary Industries, Department of Conservation council, and Ngāti Rēhia who are brought together to discuss issues relating to the Kauri Sanctuary. The group’s inaugural meeting was held on 24 June with Ngāti Rēhia in Kerikeri.
Hygiene Stations to Patuharakeke
The council kauri protection team supplied a further two footwear hygiene stations to Patuharakeke for installation in the Takahiwai Forest.
Kauri Protection Education Programme
The Kauri Protection Education Programme is well underway with 19 schools visited since 11 May. To date the programme has been presented to 775 children and 70 teachers across Northland.
partnerships
Tutukākā High Value Area
Weed control: Special Weed Assistance Tutukaka (S.W.A.T) has been working with Ngunguru School providing two workshops for year 7 and 8 students. The first workshop was held in class to help students learn to identify pest plants, understand the impact they have and learn how to control them. The second was a field-based session, putting their identification and control skills into practice.
Kiwi monitoring: The annual listening census commenced on 29 May. Preliminary results indicate the spread of kiwi round the whole district is significant, with one site experiencing an all-time high of 46 calls over the two hour period.
Other endangered species: At the eight Bird Monitoring Stations established within the high value area, the counts for a range of rare species during this quarter are almost completed. Results show kākā have reappeared, with three sightings so far at the Tutukākā stations.
Mid North High Value Area
“Fight for the Wild” TV series: This four-part series has generated a lot of interest from the public, and is considered a “must watch” for every New Zealander.
Piroa Brynderwyn High Value Area
Bream Tail Farm Kiwi: Three years of extensive pest control carried out in the Bream Tail Farm Community Pest Control Area by the owners and council has paid off with the confirmed presence of a pair of kiwi on the farm. This is the first known kiwi pair on the property in living memory, and they are likely breed this season.
Whangārei Heads High Value Area
· Weed Action Whangārei Heads: Weed amnesty (where residents of the Heads can bring down their dirtiest, nastiest most invasive weeds and dispose of them for free) has concluded for another year at the Pārua Bay Community Centre. The community filled 3 x 9 m3 skip bins - 27cubic meters with weed species from the Weed Action 'dirtiest dozen' list.
· Backyard Kiwi: Kiwi listening is well underway for with many volunteers collecting data from monitoring sites across the district to see the long term trends of kiwi. Monitoring is done over four nights with 2 hours each night.
Western Northland High Value Area
Te Toa Whenua Community Pest Control Area covers approximately 1400 ha of regenerating cleared pine forest, scrubland, and native forest in the lower Waipoua River Catchment. The aim of the project is to restore biodiversity values through intensive predator and weed control.
A possum control operation using feratox delivered through 756 bait stations has recently been carried out with an estimated average kill of 5-7 possums per bait station. The pre-monitor result (completed in September 2020) was 7.69%, with post monitoring residual trap catch (RTC) results coming in at 9% which was higher than the pre-monitor. Reasons for this are hypothesized below:
· High rates of reinvasion from the surrounding pines and forest.
· Some of the pre-monitor lines falling in gumland habitat that has very low possum numbers anyway providing a falsely low RTC result. The contractor also felt that there should have been more possums caught considering the amount of browse they were observing.
· The spacing of bait station lines are not at best practice spacing because they have had to be placed to avoid kauri as much as possible. This may mean that possums are not able to be controlled well enough to get to less than 5% RTC.
Result monitoring through RTC or wax tag monitoring will continue to test how different timing and number of pulses impact on possum numbers. Staff may also look at placing bait stations in between the current bait stations at 50 m spacings along lines to improve results.
Kiwi Coast – Northland Regional Council Partnership
Highlights of the past month included:
· Northland Pest Control Wānanga: This year’s wānanga was co-hosted by Ngāti Rēhia on Whitiora Marae with council support and was attended by 180 people.
Participants of the Northland Pest Control Wānanga held at Whitiora Marae
· 2020 collective pest control results: Kiwi Coast pest control results from the 2020 calendar year have been collated and show that Northlanders linked into Kiwi Coast have trapped half a million pests over the last 8 years. More information is available at this website https://kiwicoast.org.nz/kiwi-coast-groups-trap-half-a-million-pests-over-8-years/.
Kiwi Coast flier – nearly half a million pests gone since 2013.
· Pest Free Purerua: Setting up the Pest Free Purerua Project has been the big focus this month (and the year). Landowner liaison and community group discussion are a large part of gaining trust and obtaining community input. This work has culminated in a successful Whitiora Marae Wānanga and the Matakā Station-Kiwis for Kiwi Trust meeting. This month has seen an intensification of traps and trap check frequency on Purerua/Taronui and the adjoining buffer zone.
Predator Free Whangarei
The Predator Free Whangārei team (council staff), alongside key Landcare Group leads, have meet with 88 of the initial 206 landowners to discuss possum eradication and seek land access agreements.
Over the coming months the team will continue to meet with landowners and prepare to install the possum eradication trap and bait station network between Bream Head and Ody Road in preparation for the initial stage of the possum eradication which is scheduled to commence later this year.
marine biosecurity
Hull Surveillance Programme
The 2020 – 2021 hull surveillance season has drawn to a successful end with 2,145 vessels inspected over this period. Whilst the programme did have several incidents this season, for the most part these consisted of just a few individual invasive organisms on otherwise clean vessels that ultimately pose a low biosecurity risk. Where a vessel was detected with a large number of pests, the risk was mitigated quickly and the organisms analysed to determine their reproductive capacity.
In all cases it was discovered that these vessels were detected before these organisms were reproductive and/or able to spawn, reaffirming the need for ongoing monitoring of Northland’s fleet.
This month, two incidents were detected from the 346 vessels surveyed, both in Tutukaka Harbour. These vessels had been recently cleaned and each only harboured a small number of Mediterranean fanworm in niche areas which were neutralised on discovery. Staff continue to work with these vessel owners to ensure they are more vigilant at checking these areas.
Hull Surveillance Programme Results (25-05-21 to 29-06-21) |
Total this period |
Total |
Pathways Plan Compliance |
|
|
Number of vessels surveyed this period |
346 |
2,145 |
% Pathways Plan Compliance (all vessels) * |
39.3% |
44.57% |
% Pathways Plan Compliance (recent arrivals) ** |
80% |
74.1% |
Vessels found with Marine Pests |
|
|
Sabella spallanzanii (fanworm) |
9 |
76 |
Styela clava (clubbed tunicate) |
2 |
54 |
Undaria pinnatifida (Japanese kelp) |
0 |
2 |
Eudistoma elongatum (Australian droplet tunicate) |
2 |
35 |
Pyura doppelgangera (sea squirt) |
0 |
0 |
* % of all vessels surveyed that complied with the acceptable level of light fouling as defined in the Marine Pathways Plan.
** % of vessels on anchor that complied with the acceptable level of light fouling as defined in the Marine Pathways Plan.
Blue Cradle Cruise workshop
In June 2021, a team of scientists from the Cawthron Institute, Blue Cradle (an ocean non-profit foundation), The University of Otago, Auckland University and ESR - Science and Research arrived at Marsden Cove, Whangārei on board the research vessel S/V Manawanui. The 14-day expedition kickstarts Aotearoa’s participation in the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030).
Cruise members participated in two workshops organised in collaboration with Northland Regional Council that focused on issues associated with marine biosecurity and micro-plastics. The first day involved a hands-on workshop with over 50 representatives from local communities, iwi and hapū, central government and science research institutions. The following day, they took part in an educational experience where around 100 school students boarded the vessel to learn about the impact that marine invasive species and microplastics have on our ocean environments.
|
|
S/V Manawanui cruise participants at Marsden Cove |
The workshop included presentations on micro- |
Ōpua Sabella eradication
Diver removal work was conducted in discrete, targeted periods between November 2020 and June 2021. Results indicate that there are no or very few Sabella located on the seafloor between structures (most likely due to unsuitable habitat structure), and we are now able to target current and future removal efforts more efficiently to the most suitable habitats and locations.
Data also indicates it is highly likely the majority of the remaining adult population have been removed. The task ahead is now to systemically remove the remaining population of recent recruits, which in turn will drive the size class structure downwards until the population is eradicated or so sparsely distributed that it collapses.
Funding is in place for the continuation of this project, and we have a good understanding of how to maximise success, providing no new incursions occur. Additional hull surveillance will be conducted over the coming years to bolster our efforts at keeping new incidents out of the Bay of Islands and we are considering ways to obtain locally meaningful growth rate information alongside the eradication work to ensure our efforts are as efficient as possible.
Clean Hull Plan
Development of the Clean Hull Plan has progressed considerably in the last quarter with drafts either complete or almost complete for the Cost Benefit Analysis and the Cost Allocation Analysis, as well as a range of complimentary pieces of work including the drafting of a Multi-Agency Agreement.
Pre-engagement with treaty partners and key stakeholders is underway and the project team are collating and considering the feedback to identify issues and opportunities as well as any implications for the direction of the plan. The team have progressed further thinking around the use of the proposed plan as a stepping-stone to a national model and are managing alignment by considering the treatment of existing rules in regional pest or pathway management plans.
Further advice on a requirement for biosecurity risk management plans for high-risk structures/activities and a briefing note on the identified barrier of ‘insufficient vessel cleaning infrastructure in NZ’ are being prepared. Decision papers for councils are being drafted as information is finalised, and planning is underway in anticipation of formal consultation.
pest plants
Eradication Plants
The main batwing passionflower Kamo and Tikipunga searches have been completed. Additional contract funding has allowed for an extended search area which has found a wider extent of infestation. The area will require follow up in August.
Weed Workshops
After COVID-19 disrupting delivery last year, 2021 has seen a welcome return of council’s weed workshops. Five workshops are being run over June and July, with excellent participation from the community. It is expected that over 90 community participants will participate over the series of five workshops held between Whangārei, Dargaville, Cooper’s Beach, and Kerikeri.
|
This year’s Weed Workshops drew a lot of interest from the community |
RIVERS
Long Term Plan Projects
Rivers |
Comments |
Awanui |
Approximately (86%) of scheduled works have been completed. Approximately 60% of Alan Bell Park work and 100% Milky Way Flood Wall work remain (anticipated to be undertaken during winter). |
Otīria/Moerewa |
The preliminary design, flood modeling and landowner engagement is progressing. |
Matangirau |
Landowner engagement is progressing with expectations to start work next season. |
NATURAL HAZARDS
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
Region wide Coastal hazard erosion mapping |
100% complete |
Maps were published on the 19 April for a 3-month feedback period. Total genuine feedback enquiries responded to approximately 125. |
Coastal erosion research |
100% complete |
Report received from Auckland University. Research focused on looking at long term shoreline change patterns using decadal-scale records using historical aerial imagery. |
Region wide Coastal hazard flood mapping |
100% complete |
Maps were published on the 19 April for a 3 month feedback period. Total genuine feedback enquiries responded to approximately 15. |
Region-wide River flood mapping |
95% complete |
All model results and maps have been received; quality assurance and control process ongoing; aiming to publish the maps end of August beginning of September |
Whangārei River Catchment flood model |
In progress |
Upgrade of model including new structures, updated LiDAR and sea level rise values and recalibration. Initial draft outcomes expected at the beginning of August 2021. |
Website Natural Hazards Portal |
In progress |
Morphum Environmental have been engaged to develop the portal; first inclusive workshop was held; draft concept is expected towards the end of July. |
Whangārei Inner Harbour Hydrodynamic Model |
90% complete |
Detailed, site specific. upgrade of the current coastal inundation model. Draft report received with the final deliverable expected beginning of July. |
Climate Change Response
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
NRC Climate Change Strategy “Ngā Tāmata o te Moana’ and implementation plan |
Ready for adoption |
Climate Change Strategy and implementation plan was presented to TTMAC 10 June and Climate Change Working Party 16 June. New name for strategy ‘Ngā Taumata o te Moana’ – gifted by TTMAC Co-Chair Pita Tipene. Final strategy and implementation plan to be presented for adoption at council meeting 20 July. |
Climate Adaptation Te Taitokerau – Joint Climate Adaptation Strategy |
In progress |
Work well under way on draft strategy, including chapters: · Climate risk overview (draft complete). · Local government Adaptation Toolbox (Kaipara District Council lead) – in draft. · Climate Risk and Māori (external consultant) – in progress - may not meet deadline. · Coastal community profiles (Northland Regional Council lead) - in progress; 3 out of 5 workshops with territorial authorities completed; spatial data analysis completed. · Adaptation engagement framework (Northland Regional Council lead) – in draft. · Adaptation strategy communications plan (Whangarei District Council lead) – in progress. · Strategy summary and recommendations (Northland Regional Council lead) – in progress. Aiming to have draft complete by late July. |
Joint
Climate Change Adaptation |
Ongoing |
Draft Te Taitokerau Adaptation Strategy to be discussed at a workshop of the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee meeting 9 August, and draft presented at next Joint Committee meeting 30 August. |
MĀORI ENGAGEMENT
TTMAC Strategic Priorities
At the May 2020 Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) meeting, TTMAC considered and decided that their strategic priorities are:
1. Development of an overarching water strategy.
2. Development of a climate change strategy.
3. Development of an economic development strategy and with a focus on Māori Economic Development.
4. Development of a marine strategy as it pertains to Te Taitokerau.
5. Build tangata whenua capacity and capability.
6. Strengthen Māori Representation in local body politics.
It was also agreed that MTAG would flesh out these priorities and bring them back to TTMAC. From May to December 2020 MTAG focused on the Build tangata whenua capacity and capability strategic priority, identifying priority areas of spending that were recommended to council for inclusion in the development of the Long Term Plan 2021-2031.
It was agreed at the February 2021 TTMAC meeting that staff would provide a summary of the work happening across council as it relates to each priority – this was provided at the April 2021 TTMAC meeting. The agreed action points rising from the April 2021 TTMAC meeting discussions were:
That a special TTMAC planning workshop be convened in May to outline key objectives and priorities for the six agreed strategic priorities.
That a small group of two to three members hold an initial meeting to co-design how the larger TTMAC planning workshop will be facilitated as soon as possible in the next week.
An initial meeting was held on 19 April to scope out what a TTMAC strategic priorities plan would look like, with a direction for staff to prepare a draft and then hold a workshop to discuss.
Two consultants were contracted to assist with preparing the draft and facilitating the workshop (David Badham and Makarena Dalton, Barkers and Associate).
The workshop was held on 27 May, attended by Pita Tipene (Co-chair), Nora Rameka, Mike Kake, Cr Marty Robinson (Co-chair), Lynette Wharerau, Juliane Chetham and staff. The output of the workshop was a first cut of the TTMAC strategic priorities plan with a presentation at the June TTMAC meeting.
Ngā Poutama Matawhenua Practical Māori GIS Mapping Wānanga
We were excited to have an opportunity to work with Duane Wilkins, Senior Advisor Geospatial Capability Building from Toitū te Whenua (Land Information New Zealand) on his recent visit to Te Taitokerau. Duane spent three days delivering workshops in Whangārei and Kerikeri, hosted by Ngatirehia, NGEN Digitech Academy and Te Puni Kōkiri. He also attended the Water Resilience Group meeting offering advice and support for iwi representatives.
Duane has worked over several years to empower Māori communities by providing access to digital geospatial information. This supports decision-making about their whenua and preserving historical knowledge before it is lost. He is currently delivering free, online Ngā Poutama Matawhenua Practical Māori GIS Mapping Wānanga to more than 1,000 participants.
His spirit of service came to the fore when Duane was seconded to the COVID-19 Operations Command Centre where he developed a support website and series of map-based tools to support the work of Māori and Pacific communities and NGOs in the response effort. Empowering communities is always central to Duane’s work, which is what makes him a valued and respected public servant and a recipient of the New Zealand Public Service Medal.
|
|
|
Duane Wilkins with Nora Rameka (Ngāti Rehia), council staff and forestry training students from Jack Johnson contractors |
||
|
|
|
At Te Puni Kōkiri with staff, Māori organisations and NGEN Digitech Academy for Māori youth. |
||
Te Whāriki Māori Responsiveness Policy in Action
Level 1 Te Whāriki Cultural Competency Workshop held at Mahimaru Marae for our Kaitaia staff.
Te Tiriti Health Check being developed with the Māori Technical Advisory Group on behalf of TTMAC in council’s commitment to building organisational cultural capabilities and competencies regarding Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
A mihi whakatau held for new Land Management Manager and Kaipara Moana Entity Administrator was a demonstration of staff competency and manaakitanga welcoming both staff to the organisation.
Level 2 Te Whāriki Cultural Competency Workshops to begin for all staff in July and planning has been initiated to embed this as part of the overall training plan.
Kaimahi Māori meetings held fortnightly to support Māori staff over a shared kai building whanaungatanga across council.
7.3.6 STRATEGY, Governance And Engagement
REGIONAL PLANNING
Proposed Regional Plan
Since the last update to council, the Court has facilitated expert witness conferences relating to ecology and planning for the fishing control/MPA appeals in order to reach agreed statements of facts. The hearing is set down for July and August.
The Court has released its final decision on mapping and provisions relating to Significant Ecological Areas (primarily affecting the Bay of Islands and Hokianga) and has agreed to put the resolution of appeals on Vehicles on Beaches and Mangroves provisions ‘on hold’ until the High Court hearing on the wetlands in the CMA jurisdictional question has been heard (set down for 6 September in Auckland).
Stock exclusion provisions have been set down for hearing from 4 to 6 October.
Staff have continued to work with parties to resolve appeals relating to aquaculture provisions and have circulated proposed wording to councillors delegated to make decisions on appeals in this regard.
Staff have also instructed council’s lawyer, as agreed in council workshop on the advice of TTMAC, to request the Court adjourn the mapping of Outstanding Natural Landscapes in the CMA using a truncated s.293 process. The Court has declined this request, instead directing a three-month extension for consultation with tangata whenua, community groups and other parties with a reporting date on the outcome of this consultation of 30 September 2021.
NPS Freshwater Management - Proposed Plan Change
The Policy and Planning team have started the development of a ‘strawman’ water quality plan change document to support consultation with the Tangata Whenua Water Advisory Group (TWWAG) and the Primary Sector Liaison Group (PSLG). The PSLG will meet again to start providing feedback on the strawman document, once it is ready, possibly August. The next TWWAG meeting is on 13 August and will likely focus on further developing their workplan.
Progress has been made in delivering the science to support the proposed plan change including the update of NRC’s environmental monitoring network to meet the requirements of the NPS-FM 2020, modelling the effectiveness of different mitigation options to improve water quality with a focus on agricultural land and the allocation of $50,000 in the 2021/2022 budget to undertake similar modelling for planted forests.
The TWWAG met on 14 June and did further work on their work programme and agreed to hold a wānanga as a means of brainstorming their ideas and thoughts as to the work needed, to stocktake the work already being done by hapū and whanau, and what Te Mana O Te Wai means.
District Planning
Two appeals have been lodged on decisions on a Plan Change to the Kaipara District Plan. Private plan change 78 (Estuary Estates) sought adjustments to existing residential and business zoning for 130ha of land in Mangawhai. While council did not lodge submissions on the plan change, staff consider there is merit in council joining both appeals as an interested party under section 274 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
The council interests in the appeals relates to ensuring appropriate three waters infrastructure is provided (particularly water supply) and the development is consistent with direction in the Regional Policy Statement. Given timeframes, the Executive Leadership Team exercised delegated authority to approve lodging of the s274 notices with the Environment Court (the appeal period closed 23 June and notices to join proceedings are to be filed before 14 July).
NATIONAL INITIATIVES
Three Waters Reform
The Government has announced its package of reforms for delivery of three waters services and infrastructure. The key elements of the reforms include:
Creation of four publicly owned water services entities to own and operate three water services on behalf of local authorities – these entities are to be operationally and financially separate from local authorities.
Establishment of independent boards to govern each water service entity.
Each entity will have a Regional Representative Group to represent the local authority ‘owners’ of the entity and mana whenua (a 50:50 representation from each) – this group will issue a statement of strategic and performance expectations to inform the management of three waters services. Local authority representatives are likely to be elected members or suitably qualified council officers.
Each entity will be required to engage with consumers and communities and establish a ‘consumer forum’.
Entities will be required to be transparent in how they calculate and set prices, and must engage with consumers and communities on proposed prices and charges,
Development of an economic regulation and consumer protection regime (to be consulted on).
Controls on privatisation requiring a 75% majority of the Regional Representative Group and a public referendum with 75% in favour before privatisation proposals can proceed.
Requiring the entities to participate in the new resource management system (including spatial planning and providing infrastructure for growth).
Development of a Government Policy Statement to provide strategic direction, guide investment by entities and direction on providing for Māori interests and participation.
Northland is to be included in ‘Entity A’ made up of Auckland, Far North, Kaipara and Whangārei jurisdictions with a ‘connected population’ of 1.7 million. The DIA has estimated average household cost for consumers in Entity A of $800 with the reforms and $2,170 without (by 2051).
More detail is available here: https://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/Three-waters-reform-programme/$file/transforming-the-system-for-delivering-three-waters-services-the-case-for-change-and-summary-of-proposals-30-june-2021.pdf
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Investment and Growth Reserve – Projects Report
Update |
Future developments/ reporting |
|
Extension 350 |
Participated in evaluation group quarterly review meeting |
|
Project Development funding payments made to Northland Inc to support business case developments for the Ipipiri Great Walk and for the revision/redevelopment of Extenison 350.
Other Work Undertaken
Joint economic development initiative – co-ordinated the signing of documents relating to the share transfer and Shareholders’ Agreement. Northland Inc is now jointly and equally owned by Northland Regional Council, Kaipara District Council and Far North District Council effective 1 July 2021.
Northland Inc – worked with Northland to develop key performance indicators to include in final SOI.
Northland Inc quarterly workshop – organised final quarterly workshop held on 22 June.
Northland Economic Quarterly – June 2021 issued prepared, distributed and avilable online at https://www.nrc.govt.nz/resource-library-summary/newsletters/economic-quarterly/ . The annual section reports on Northland data from the latest Agricultural Production Statistics while the spotlight section examines the increase in recipients of Jobseeker Support benefit in Northland. The NEQ is available through council’s eNewsletter service, sign-up at: www.nrc.govt.nz/enewsletters.
Economic information – presentation to Education2Employment Te Tai Tokerau Teachers Day event at Ōkaihau College.
Infrastructure for a Better Future – participated in a joint submission with other Northland councils, large private sector firms and Chamber of Commerce in response to the Aotearoa New Zealand Infrastructure Strategy Consultation Document released by the New Zealand Infrastructure Commission.
Hokianga Navigator Role – sent a letter formally withdrawing council’s funding contribution as the position is not proceeding because other required co-funding sources were not secured.
Oruku Landing Conference and Event Centre – continue to meet regularly with WDC and NDC representatives to develop project to a postion whereby WDC can make a decision on whether or not to proceed.
ONLINE CHANNELS
Most popular content on Facebook: Most popular post for June was the TVNZ Breakfast interview with Councillor Amy MacDonald and NorthTec’s Dr. Manue Martinez on the LittaTraps. We had a reach of 5,871 people with 154 people engaged. Posted on Wednesday 25 June.
*Engaged – number of people who ‘reacted’, commented or shared the post
Key Performance Indicators |
Feb 21 |
Mar-21 |
Apr-21 |
May-21 |
Jun-21 |
WEB |
|
|
|
|
|
# Visits to the NRC website |
40,200 |
77,800 |
39,000 |
35,400 |
34,100 |
E-payments made |
12 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
9 |
# subscription customers (cumulative) |
1,286 |
1,276 |
1,278 |
1,276 |
1,287 |
SOCIAL MEDIA (cumulative) |
|
|
|
|
|
# Twitter followers |
1,558 |
1,563 |
1,560 |
1,548 |
1,555 |
# NRC Facebook fans |
10,200 |
10,300 |
10,300 |
10,400 |
10,441 |
# NRC Overall Facebook Reach |
211,800 |
173,800 |
96,800 |
145,600 |
62,800 |
# NRC Engaged Daily Users |
8,283 |
11,100 |
5,266 |
8,796 |
3,249 |
# CDEM Facebook fans |
21,900 |
25,200 |
25,200 |
25,200 |
25,271 |
# CDEM Overall Facebook Reach |
262,600 |
484,900 |
66,500 |
36,700 |
29,300 |
# CDEM Engaged Daily Users |
34,100 |
53,700 |
1,625 |
2,416 |
1,410 |
# Instagram followers |
1,330 |
1,337 |
1,360 |
1,383 |
1,399 |
NOTES:
Mar– increase in visits to website and CDEM Facebook reach due to the
tsunami evacuation on 5 March
May –Online payment figures incomplete due to termination of BNZ service.
ENVIROSCHOOLS / EDUCATION
Dune Lakes Events – Humuhumu and Waiparera
On 4 June Biodiversity and Enviroschools staff joined the Waikaretu Marae community and Pouto and Te Kopuru schools at Lake Humuhumu. Students and adults took part in riparian planting, carried out water quality tests, and discovered fish and amphibious plants. On 25 June a similar dune lakes education event was held at Lake Waiparera as part of the Noho Taio o Te Hiku.
Project Pest Control – Whangārei Skills Workshops
On 10 and 11 and 14 and 15 June, two Project Pest Control skills courses were held at Rayonier’s Glenbervie Forest. Te Kura Taumata o Panguru and five Whangārei secondary schools took part in the NCEA-based course centred on biosecurity and biodiversity, including setting traplines. Council’s Biosecurity and Enviroschools teams joined with local industry representatives to deliver the training.
Enviroschools Bronze Status
On 10 June, Cr Jack Craw officiated at Kamo Kids Enviroschools Bronze celebration. The childcare centre has a weekly ngahere programme based at Hodges Park in Kamo, it is using upcycled resources, gardening, composting and is increasing tamariki connections with the environment overall. The centre’s next steps include water conservation and creating a community mara rongoa.
|
|
|
|
|
Enviroschools communities facilitated
During June, Enviroschools Facilitators visited 42 school and early childhood communities.
Regional Communications
During June and early July, several regional communications went out to Northlanders around the work we do including:
an eight-page insert in the Northern Advocate to highlight the winners of our recent Whakamānawa ā Taiao – Environmental Awards. These awards recognise kaitiakitanga in action and the efforts of people across Northland to help our Environment thrive;
a brochure included with rates notices across the three districts, to explain our rates and the different areas of work our revenue goes in to; and
‘Our Northland’, our quarterly council news which goes into six local papers across the region and is also circulated as an electronic newsletter.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INFORMATION (LGOIMA) REQUESTS
Total LGOIMAs |
June 2019 to June 2020 |
June 2020 to June 2021 |
193 |
187 |
|
Number of LGOIMAs not responded to within 20 working days |
7 |
7.3.7 Customer Service – Community Resilience
TRANSPORT
Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027
The Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027, approved by the Regional Transport Committee on Wednesday 9 June 2021, and by the Northland Regional Council on Tuesday 15 June 2021, was submitted to Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency on Monday 28 June 2021.
National Land Transport Fund 2021-2024
On 31 May 2021, Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency forwarded an email titled “2021-24 National Land Transport Plan Indicative Funding - Northland Regional Council” detailing their Indicative Investment Levels for Continuous Programmes (Business as Usual) for the Northland Regional Council.
Included in the email was the table below which detailed the funding requested and the indicative funding approved.
|
2021-24 programme bid - requested funding (gross $) |
2021-24 programme - indicative funding approval (gross $) |
2018-21 forecast allocation in August 2018 (gross $) |
Road Safety Promotion |
$515,000 |
$515,000 |
$480,000 |
Public Transport Services |
$9,197,000 |
$7,218,000 |
$5,627,000 |
Public Transport Infrastructure |
$975,000 |
$975,000 |
$538,000 |
The funding categories above are for “Business as Usual” work. They do not require a “business case” to accompany the application. Services and projects included in the above tend to have longer-term financial certainty.
New and/or expanded projects or services less than $2.0m will require an entry-level business case to justify value for money. If approved, will be included in the “Low Cost/Low Risk” funding category, and are reviewed every three years with no certainty of continuation.
New and/or expanded projects or services in excess of $2.0m will require a detailed business case to justify value for money. If approved, will be included in the “Improvements” funding category, and are reviewed every three years with no certainty of continuation.
Rural-based passenger services have, to date, been funded from the "Low Cost/Low Risk" funding category, resulting in them having to be reviewed every three years. However, with the length of time most of these services have been in operation, the need for longer-term funding certainty and their relatively low cost, NRC applied for the required funding under the "Business as Usual" category for the 2021-2027 financial period.
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency have subsequently advised that these have been moved back under Low Cost/Low Risk. This has resulted in the variance of funding requested and Indicative Funding Approval for Public Transport Service as depicted in the above table.
Both Road Safety Promotion and Public Transport Infrastructure have provisionally been granted the funding applied for.
It is important to note that the final National Land Transport Programme, as approved by the Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency board, will only be known in August/September 2021. The information received on 31 May 2021 is indicative in nature only and is the first step in a long and detailed process.
Draft Regional Public Transport Plan 2021-2031
Due to some last-minute changes to be made to the Draft Regional Public Transport Plan 2021-2031, the Regional Transport Committee (RTC) approved this Plan be tabled at the 11 August 2021 RTC meeting for consideration and approval.
If approved, the Draft Regional Public Transport Plan 2021-2031 will be presented to the 17 August 2021 Northland Regional Council meeting for adoption and public release.
PASSENGER TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATION
*BusLink figures are reported one month in arrears, due to the required information being unavailable at the time of the agenda deadline.
Bus Link stats for May 2021 |
Actual |
Budget |
Variance |
Year/Date Actual |
Year/Date Budgeted |
CityLink Passengers |
31,937 |
30,888 |
1049 |
295,098 |
305,380 |
CityLink Revenue |
$39,032 |
$41,699 |
-$2,667 |
$369,816 |
$412,263 |
Mid North Link Passengers |
237 |
156 |
81 |
1,986 |
1,716 |
Mid North Link Revenue |
$876 |
$780 |
$96 |
$7,214 |
$8,580 |
Hokianga Link Passengers |
146 |
78 |
68 |
1210 |
858 |
Hokianga Link Revenue |
$782 |
$543 |
$239 |
$6,249 |
$5,968 |
Far North Link Passengers |
298 |
611 |
-313 |
3,983 |
6,213 |
Far North Link Revenue |
$996 |
$1,552 |
-$556 |
$10,665 |
$17,491 |
Bream Bay Link Passengers |
42 |
24 |
18 |
535 |
288 |
Bream Bay Link Revenue |
$290 |
$86 |
$204 |
$ 3,569 |
$1,036 |
Hikurangi Link Passengers |
15 |
24 |
-9 |
219 |
180 |
Hikurangi Link Revenue |
$39 |
$62 |
-$23 |
$538 |
$530 |
Whangarei Heads Link Passengers |
18 |
24 |
-6 |
86 |
180 |
Whangarei Heads Link Revenue |
$78 |
$104 |
-$26 |
$362 |
$782 |
Total Mobility
|
Total Clients |
Monthly Actual Expend |
Monthly Budgeted Expend |
Monthly Variance |
Year/Date Actual Expend |
Year/Date Budgeted Expend |
Annual Variance |
May 2021 |
1316 |
$25,146 |
$25,000 |
$146 |
$239,067 |
$275,000 |
-$35,933 |
ROAD SAFETY UPDATE
Road Trauma Update
Fatalities this year |
Far North |
Whangārei |
Kaipara |
Northland |
National |
Local roads |
2 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
87 |
State highways |
5 |
3 |
6 |
14 |
79 |
TOTAL |
7 |
5 |
8 |
20 |
175 |
Whilst nationally more crashes have been occurring on local roads, Northland is experiencing in excess of twice the number of fatal crashes occurring on the State Highway network.
Since the May 2021 Council update, there has been a marked increase in the number of fatal crashes in the Kaipara District, particularly on the State Highways.
Driver behaviour and mistakes continue to be key factors in Northland’s crashes.
Of the 20 deaths to date:
· Nine have been drivers,
· Five have been passengers,
· Four have been motorcyclists and
· Two were pedestrians.
Motorcycle Safety - Ride Forever (R4E) Rider Training Update
For the 2020/21 financial year ending June 2021, 168 riders have participated in the R4E rider training programme across Northland.
The breakdown included riders participating in the following courses, totalling 186:
· Bronze Course 52 completed
· Silver Course (intermediate) 77 completed
· Gold Course (advanced) 57 completed
Road Safety Promotion / Media
Advertising themes in the Road Safety Advertising Calendar 2020/21 for the months of June and July are ‘Alcohol, Distractions, Safe Vehicles.’
CUSTOMER SERVICES
Telephone inbound call statistics & enquiries
|
June 2021 |
Year 2020- 21 |
Target |
Call volumes via Customer Services |
2,165 |
28,452 |
|
Conversion rate |
96.9% |
97.2% |
>95% |
Average wait time |
6 sec |
6 sec |
|
Calls answered in under 30 sec |
95.1% |
96.8% |
>90% |
As more people are choosing to use email, self-service and social media, call volumes have been gradually declining. But, in Northland, it is declining at a slower rate than in urban centres. In the 2020/21 year, an average of 115 external calls per weekday were received by the Customer Services team. Conversion rates, although slightly down on last year, remain well ahead of most councils.
Biosecurity enquiries make up over 20% of all calls and remain our largest volume of new inward enquiries. Consents, maritime and compliance monitoring/hotline comprise 10% each, and calls for other organisations 14%. All other departments make up the remaining 36% of calls, with no individual department receiving more than 5% of enquiries.
Mailroom email processing performance
In June, the inward mailroom system was integrated with Customer Service’s enquiry management system. This allows better tracking of email distribution and provides information on processing of inward enquiries.
Satisfaction monitoring
Feedback cards, compliments and complaints
Feedback cards have been included with the tallies for compliments and complaints, as appropriate.
Compliments received |
Total |
Service provided by a specific person/people Customer Services – K Grammer Land Management (x2) – Y Bishop & S McKenzie |
3 |
Total compliments recorded |
3 |
Complaints received |
Total |
Staff or contractor behaviour/attitude Customer Services |
1 |
Disagree with decision or process Policy & Planning |
1 |
Standard of service provided Bus – Citylink Hydrology (x2) |
3 |
Total complaints recorded |
5 |
In addition to the one recorded complaint, there were many phone calls about the Significant Natural Areas (SNA) process. Excellent briefing information by the Policy team enabled these calls to be managed with confidence.
The two hydrology complaints received were in relation to data not being available. This was a temporary issue and was quickly resolved.
All complaints have received acknowledgement and been resolved.
Resident Survey
The draft survey report was received and has been returned for re-formatting. This will delay the finalised report slightly, and it will be available in late July.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
The Minister of Emergency Management, Hon Kris Faafoi, has approved a re-write of the Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Act 2002 as part of the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) Trifecta programme, which is a comprehensive review of the Act, National CDEM Plan and Guide to the CDEM Plan.
Northland CDEM Group and Coordinating Executive Group
The Northland CDEM Group Joint Committee and Northland Coordinating Executive Committee met for their quarterly meeting on 16 June. The agenda included an item on the Northland CDEM multi-agency response debrief to the 5 March tsunami warning. The item presented opportunities for improvement across agencies which will be incorporated into work programmes.
Tsunami Siren Upgrade
As previously reported, the tender process for the Northland Tsunami Siren network replacement has been underway. The Tender Committee have awarded the contract for the upgrade of the tsunami siren network to HSS Engineering Warning System Solutions.
Northland CDEM Group Plan 2021-2026
The draft Northland CDEM Group Plan was approved for public consultation by the Northland CDEM Joint Committee on 16 June. The five-week public consultation commenced on 21 June.
Northland Lifelines Group
The Northland Lifelines Group met on 11 June. The Group agreed on the work programme moving forward, infrastructure plan reviews, feedback into the national Trifecta programme, and feedback on the changes to the Act which affect the Lifelines Utilities sector. Agreement was also reached to include a Climate Change risk assessment for Lifeline Utilities into the work programme. The scope and funding to support the study are being developed.
Waka Kotahi
Representatives from the Northland CDEM Group staff attended and supported a regional Waka Kotahi multi-agency emergency exercise on 14 June. Other agencies represented included NZ Police, Fire and Emergency NZ, roading contractors, and the Northland Transportation Alliance.
NEMA Induction
Mana Wright and Evania Arani both attended a National Induction course for Civil Defence Emergency Management Advisors in Wellington, hosted by NEMA, in late June.
Shared Services Arrangements
Service Level Agreements for CDEM Shared Services with each of the three territorial councils are being reviewed and updated, together with updated annual work programmes and budget agreements.
MARITIME
Maritime have 54 incidents currently being managed, mostly concerned with derelict or abandoned vessels, and illegal occupation of moorings. A particular area of interest is Totara North in Whangaroa Harbour where 12 vessels are being actively managed, and one sunk. The owners have organised recovery.
The Harbourmaster assisted Maritime NZ running the annual On-Scene Commanders Oil Spill course in Auckland. The Maritime Manager attended the Recreational Boating Fund meeting in Wellington.
The Waikare has been slipped in Whangarei and is undergoing its annual maintenance, including a four-yearly survey.
The annual self-assessments for the Port and Harbour Marine Safety Code for Whangarei and the Bay of Islands have been completed, and a peer review is expected at the beginning of next year. The Pilotage Manuals for both harbours are also under review. The Harbourmaster’s Directions have also been updated, which detail specific advice for shipping.
Recruitment has continued for the two vacant Maritime positions, with one filled in Ōpua this month, and one ongoing.
Various buoys and beacons have been repaired following some very high tides and storms. However apart from a few vessels dragging, there were no mooring failures over this period. One vessel that dragged in the Bay of Islands resulted in an injured person requiring rescuing. Maritime staff salvaged his vessel a couple of days later.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 8.1
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Receipt of Committee Minutes |
ID: |
|
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager, on 19 July 2021 |
That the unconfirmed minutes of the:
· Regional Transport Committee – 9 June 2021;
· Civil Defence Emergency Management Group – 16 June 2021;
· Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee – 25 June 2021;
· Audit and Risk Subcommittee – 30 June 2021; and
· Investment and Property Subcommittee – 30 June 2021
be received.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Regional Transport
Committee - 9 June 2021 ⇩
Attachment 2: Civil Defence Emergency
Management Group - 16 June 2021 ⇩
Attachment 3: Kaipara Moana Remediation
Joint Committee - 25 June 2021 ⇩
Attachment 4: Audit and Risk
Subcommittee - 30 June 2021 ⇩
Attachment 5: Investment and Property
Subcommittee - 30 June 2021 ⇩
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings |
ID: |
|
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Ben Lee, GM - Strategy, Governance and Engagement, on date 20 July 2021 |
That the report ‘Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings’ be received.
Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party (Chair Cr Jack Craw)
The Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party met on 16 June 2021. The topics for discussion included:
· Draft Biosecurity Operational Plan
· Spartina Eradication
· Pest Fish
· Dune Monitoring Update
· General Update
Following discussion, the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:
· Presenting the Draft Biosecuirty Operational Plan to Council for full approval
· Ensure hapū/iwi are included in the Biosecuirty Operational Plan wokrstream KPIs where relevant
· Investigate how to best provide advice regarding Myrtle Rust; highlight Myrtle Rust issues for NRC and KMR staff to consider as part of future land management grant schemes
Climate Change Working Party (Chair Cr Amy Macdonald)
The Climate Change Working Party met on 16 June 2021. The topics for discussion included:
· Climate Change Strategy and Implementation Plan
· LTP Project Update
Following discussion, the Climate Change Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:
· Subject to any final amendments, that the Climate Change Working Party recommend to council to adopt the draft Climate Change Strategy and Implementation Plan at the July 2021 council meeting
· That council seek informal feedback from district councils in Northland prior to July adoption
· The Climate Change Working Party supports council making a public statement about council’s position and commitments regarding action on climate change following council’s adoption of the Climate Change Strategy and Implementation Plan in July.
Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (Co-Chairs: Clr Robinson and Pita Tipene)
The Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party met on 10 June 2021. The topics for discussion included:
· Non-elected Members Allowances Policy
· Strategic priorities
· Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) and mapping of Outstanding Natural Landscapes in the Coastal Marine Area
· Review of representation on working parties
· TTMAC appointment(s) to other working parties of council
· Regional marae-based hui
· LTP 2021-2031 update
· Māori representation update
· NRC Climate Change Strategy and Implementation Plan
· Kaipara Moana Remediation Programme
· Working Party Reports, including the Tangata Whenua Water Advisory Group
Following discussion, the Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:
· That the draft strategic direction document be further developed by the existing group and then returned to TTMAC for review
· That the following vacancies be filled as follows:
§ The member for Ngātiwai be appointed onto the Planning and Regulatory Working Party and onto the Māori Technical Advisory Group (MTAG)
§ That the member for Ngāti Rehia be appointed onto the Climate Change Working Party
· That Te Uri o Hau host the 9 September 2021 regional marae-based hui, with the event based around the signing of a Mana Whakahono a Rohe
· That the Māori Technical Advisory Group (MTAG) work with staff to provide input into the Te Tiriti Health Check workplan for LTP 2021-2031 Year 1
· That staff take TTMAC’s feedback to council about the Environment Court imposed process for mapping of Outstanding Natural Landscapes for their consideration, and to discuss it with council’s lawyers
· To invite Mike Smith to present from a Te Ao Māori viewpoint to TTMAC about climate change
· That TTMAC endorse the Tāngata Whenua Water Advisory Group’s (TWWAG) Terms of Reference with the exception of the remuneration clauses, which in their view should be paid in accordance with the Non-Elected Members’ Allowance Policy.
Council Meeting ITEM: 9.0
28 July 2021
TITLE: |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to recommend that the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider the confidential matters detailed below for the reasons given.
1. That the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider confidential matters.
2. That the general subject of the matters to be considered whilst the public is excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to this matter, and the specific grounds under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution, are as follows:
Item No. |
Item Issue |
Reasons/Grounds |
9.1 |
Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - Council Meeting 15 June 2021 |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting. |
9.2 |
Receipt of Committee Confidential Minutes |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting. |
9.3 |
Human Resources Report |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a). |
9.4 |
Purchase of Whangārei CBD Properties |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i). |
9.5 |
NIWA Kingfish RAS Project |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i). |
3. That the Independent Financial Advisors be permitted to stay during business with the public excluded.
Considerations
1. Options
Not applicable. This is an administrative procedure.
2. Significance and Engagement
This is a procedural matter required by law. Hence when assessed against council policy is deemed to be of low significance.
3. Policy and Legislative Compliance
The report complies with the provisions to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting as detailed in sections 47 and 48 of the Local Government Official Information Act 1987.
4. Other Considerations
Being a purely administrative matter; Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.
[1] The Bill describes Te Oranga o te Taiao as incorporating: “a) the health of the natural environment; and b) the intrinsic relationship between iwi and hapu and te taiao; and c) the interconnectedness of all parts of the natural environment; and d) the essential relationship between the health of the natural environment and its capacity to sustain all life”.
[2] Whilst the Bill refers to Te Tiriti o Waitangi the accompanying Parliamentary Paper notes that this strengthened requirement will be realised through participatory rights for tangata whenua in preparing NBA plans and Regional Spatial Strategies and the expectation that iwi management plans will be used in the preparation of NBA plans.