Council Tuesday 17 August 2021 at 10.30am
|
|
|
|
Council Meeting
17 August 2021
Northland Regional Council Agenda
Meeting to be held in the Council Chamber
36 Water Street, Whangārei
on Tuesday 17 August 2021, commencing at 10.30am
Recommendations contained in the council agenda are NOT council decisions. Please refer to council minutes for resolutions.
RĪMITI (Item) Page
1.0 Ngā Mahi Whakapai (Housekeeping)
Key Health and Safety points to note:
· If the fire alarm goes off – exit down the stairwell to the assembly point which is the visitor carpark.
· Earthquakes – drop, cover and hold
· Visitors please make sure you have signed in at reception, and that you sign out when you leave. Please wear your name sticker.
· The toilets are on the opposite side of the stairwell.
2.0 Karakia Timatanga – Tauāki ā roto (Opening karakia)
3.0 Ngā Whakapahā (apologies)
4.0 Ngā Whakapuakanga (DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST)
5.0 Ngā Whakaae Miniti me te Mahere Mahi (Council Minutes and Action Sheet)
5.1 Confirmation of Minutes - 28 July 2021 6
5.2 Receipt of Action Sheet 14
6.0 Ngā Ripoata Putea (Financial Reports)
6.1 Externally Managed Funds: 2020/21 Performance and Proposed Allocation of Gains 16
6.2 Request for Approval to Carry Forward Operational Budget from the 2020/21 Financial Year into the 2021/22 Financial Year 52
6.3 Request for Approval to Carry Forward Capital Expenditure Budget from the 2020/21 Financial Year into the 2021/22 Financial Year 55
6.4 Draft Financial Result to 30 June 2021 61
6.5 Special Reserves at 30 June 2021 65
6.6 Regional Rates Collection 2020/21 76
6.7 Review of Non-Elected Members' Allowance Policy 81
7.0 Ngā Take (Decision Making Matters)
7.1 Environmental Fund Over Allocation 90
7.2 Freshwater farm plan regulations and Stock exclusion regulations: Proposed changes to the low slope map – Discussion Documents 93
7.3 Emergency Services Fund Allocations 2021-2024 99
7.4 Adoption of the Investment Policy and Liability Management Policy 102
8.0 Ngā Ripoata Mahi (Operational Reports)
8.1 Health and Safety Report 113
8.2 Chair's Report to Council 120
8.3 Chief Executive’s Report to Council 122
8.4 Reporting on Long Term Plan 2018-2028 Performance Measures for the year ended 30 June 2021 147
8.5 Legislative compliance for the period 1 January to 30 June 2021 157
9.0 Receipt of Committee Minutes and Working Party/Group Updates
9.1 Receipt of Committee Minutes 159
10.0 Kaupapa ā Roto (Business with the Public Excluded) 168
10.1 Confirmation of Minutes - Confidential Council Meeting Minutes 28 July 2021
10.2 Human Resources Report
10.3 Nomination of Directors to Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited
10.4 Enterprise System for Approval to Execute Contract
10.5 NIWA Kingfish RAS Project
10.6 Introduction of Two New Fund Managers into the Long-Term Investment Fund
ACC - Accident Compensation Corporation ALGIM - Association of Local Government Information Management AMA - Aquaculture Management Area AMP - Asset Management Plan/Activity Management Plan AP - Annual Plan BOI - Bay of Islands BOPRC - Bay of Plenty Regional Council CAPEX - Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets) CBEC - Community, Business and Environment Centre CCO – Council Controlled Organisation CCTO – Council Controlled Trading Organisation CDEM - Civil Defence Emergency Management CEEF – Chief Executives Environment Forum CEG - Co-ordinating Executive Group CEO - Chief Executive Officer CIMS - Co-ordinated Incident Management System (emergency management structure) CMA - Coastal Marine Area CPCA - Community Pest Control Areas CRI - Crown Research Institute DHB - District Health Board DOC - Department of Conservation DP – District Plan E350 – Extension 350 programme ECA - Environmental Curriculum Award ECAN - Environment Canterbury EECA - Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority EF - Environment Fund EMA - Employers and Manufacturers Association EOC - Emergency Operations Centre EPA - Environmental Protection Authority ETS - Emissions Trading Scheme FDE - Farm Dairy Effluent FNDC - Far North District Council FNHL - Far North Holdings Limited FPP - First Past the Post GE - Genetic Engineering GIS - Geographic Information System GMO - Genetically Modified Organism HBRC - Hawke's Bay Regional Council HEMP - Hapū Environmental Management Plan Horizons - Brand name of Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council HR - Human Resources HSNO - Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act HSWA - Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 IEMP - Iwi Environmental Management Plan ILGACE - Iwi and Local Government Chief Executives Forum IPPC - Invited Private Plan Change IRIS - Integrated Regional Information System KDC - Kaipara District Council KPI - Key Performance Indicator LAWA – Land, Air, Water Aotearoa LEA - Local Electoral Act 2001 LGA - Local Government Act 2002 LGNZ - Local Government New Zealand LGOIMA - Local Government Official Information & Meetings Act 1987 LIDAR – Light detection and ranging LTI – Long time injury LTP - Long Term Plan MBIE – Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment MFE - Ministry for the Environment MFL – Māori Freehold Land MHWS - Mean High Water Springs MMH - Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited MNZ - Maritime New Zealand MOH - Ministry of Health MOT - Ministry of Transport |
MPI - Ministry for Primary Industries MSD - Ministry of Social Development NCMC - National Crisis Management Centre NDHB - Northland District Health Board NEMA – National Emergency Management Agency NES - National Environmental Standards NFT – Northland Forward Together NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation NIF - Northland Intersectoral Forum NINC - Northland Inc. Limited NIWA - National Institute of Water and Atmosphere NORTEG - Northland Technical Advisory Group NPS - National Policy Statement NZCPS - New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement NZRC - New Zealand Refining Company (Marsden Point) NZTA – Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency NZTE - New Zealand Trade and Enterprise NZWWA - New Zealand Water and Wastes Association OFI - Opportunity for Improvement\ OPEX – Operating Expenditures OSH - Occupational Safety & Health OTS – Office of Treaty Settlements PCBU - Person Conducting Business or Undertaking PGF – Provincial Growth Fund PPE - Personal Protective Equipment RAP - Response Action Plan RBI - Regional Broadband Initiative RCP - Regional Coastal Plan RFI - Request for Information RFP - Request for Proposal RLTP - Regional Land Transport Plan RMA - Resource Management Act 1991 RMG - Resource Managers Group (Regional Councils) RMZ - Riparian Management Zone ROI - Return on Investment RP – Regional Plan RPMP - Regional Pest Management Plan RPMS - Regional Pest Management Strategy RPS - Regional Policy Statement RPTP – Regional Public Transport Plan RRSAP – Regional Road Safety Action Plan RSG – Regional Sector Group RSHL - Regional Software Holdings Ltd RTC - Regional Transport Committee RTO - Regional Tourism Organisation SIG – Special Interest Group SIPO - Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives SITREP - Situation Report SOE - State of Environment (or) State Owned Enterprise SOI – Statement of Intent SOLGM - Society of Local Government Managers STV - Single Transferable Vote TAG - Technical Advisory Group Tier 1 - Site level plan or response for an oil spill Tier 2 - Regional level plan or response to an oil spill Tier 3 - National level plan or response to an oil spill TLA - Territorial Local Authority – City & District Councils TON – Top of the North (regions) TTMAC – Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party TTNEAP – Tai Tokerau Northland Economic Action Plan TMP - Treasury Management Plan TOR - Terms of Reference TPK - Te Puni Kōkiri (Ministry of Maori Development) TUANZ - Telecommunications Users Association of NZ UNISA - Upper North Island Strategic Alliance WDC - Whangarei District Council WHHIF - Whangarei Harbour Health Improvement Fund WRC - Waikato Regional Council WSMP - Workplace Safety Management Practices |
Council Meeting item: 5.1
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Confirmation of Minutes - 28 July 2021 |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager, on 12 August 2021 |
That the minutes of the council meeting held on 28 July 2021 be confirmed as a true and correct record.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Council Meeting Minutes 28 July 2021 ⇩
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Receipt of Action Sheet |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager, on 12 August 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
The purpose of this report is to enable the meeting to receive the current action sheet.
That the action sheet be received.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Council Action Sheet - August 2021 ⇩
Council Meeting item: 6.1
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Externally Managed Funds: 2020/21 Performance and Proposed Allocation of Gains |
ID: |
|
From: |
Simon Crabb, Finance Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 05 August 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
Council’s externally managed investment portfolio generated annual gains of $8.7M in 2020/21, which is $6.9M greater than the corresponding and very conservatively set budget of $1.8M, that was prepared during the economic disruption of COVID-19, and the uncertainty around the timing and extent of any recovery.
A summary of the annual returns and the fund balances at 30 June 2021, is presented below, with supporting detail and individual fund manager performances provided in the EriksensGlobal report presented in Attachment 1.
|
|
|
|
|
30 June 2021 |
Annual Return |
Target Return |
Annual Gains |
Closing Balance |
Short Term (STF) |
10.2% |
3.3% |
$2.0M |
$16.3M |
Long Term Fund (LTF) |
18.7% |
6.7% |
$6.7M |
$40.6M |
Total Portfolio |
|
|
$8.7M |
$56.9M |
Gains derived from council’s managed fund portfolio contributed $1.7M toward council’s general funding - as budgeted, with the additional gains of $7M contributing:
· $904K towards funding the future costs of the Enterprise System Replacement project - as previously approved by council;
· $200K in lieu of withdrawing monies from the IIF capital base (as originally budgeted);
· $150K in lieu of using council’s Equalisation Reserve (as originally budgeted);
· A proposed $596K top-up of the Opex Reserve to have sufficient funding set aside to completely cover the 2021/22 general funding contribution provided from managed fund gains;
· A proposed $649K transfer into the Equalisation Reserve; and
· A proposed $4.4M reinvestment back into the portfolio’s capital base.
Refer to Figure 1 for the level of reinvestment attributable to each Reserve.
The recommendations in this report have been incorporated into the operating result of $68K in the draft annual accounts.
1. That the report ‘Externally Managed Funds: 2020/21 Performance and Proposed Allocation of Gains ’ by Simon Crabb, Finance Manager and dated 13 July 2021, be received.
2. That $596,453 of Short-Term Investment Fund gains are transferred to the Opex Reserve and invested in NZ registered bank fixed rate term deposits with rolling maturity profiles ranging from 30 to 180 days.
3. That $2,054,194 of the Long-Term Investment Fund gains attributable to the Community Investment Fund Reserve are reinvested, and that the Infrastructure Facilities Reserve closing balance (at 30 June 2021) of $55,203 is transferred to the Community Investment Fund Reserve.
4. That $1,005,248 of Long-Term Investment Fund gains and $1,298,506 of Short-Term Investment Fund gains, both attributable to the Property Reinvestment Fund Reserve, are reinvested into their respective investment funds.
5. That $648,915 of Long-Term Investment Fund gains attributable to the Infrastructure Investment Fund Reserve are transferred to the Equalisation Reserve and invested in the Short-Term Investment Fund.
6. That $350,000 of Long-Term Investment Fund gains attributable to the Infrastructure Investment Fund Reserve are withdrawn from the Long-Term Investment Fund in lieu of using the Equalisation Fund and the capital base of the Infrastructure Investment Fund Reserve.
7. That $1,396,084 of targeted river scheme rates collected in 2020/21 for future debt repayment, and $205,066 of depreciation funding collected in 2020/21 are transferred to the Infrastructure Investment Fund Reserve, and invested into the Long-Term Investment Fund
8. That in 2021/22, $1,646,084 representing the total debt repayments collected, and $579,436 representing the total depreciation funding collected, are transferred from the Infrastructure Investment Fund Reserve into a newly established “Debt Repayment and Depreciation Funding” Reserve.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Reinvest LTF and STF gains, and attribute to the reserves as recommended in this report. |
Reinvest gains in accordance with the purpose of each reserve, develop a capital base to protect the future spending power of each reserve, and provide funding to assist delivery of council’s 2021/22 work programme. |
There is no additional funding available for projects that could be funded from the CIF Reserve. |
2 |
Do not reinvest the LTF and STF gains and attribute to the reserves as recommended in this report. |
Release funding for additional operational work programmes/or projects. |
The future spending power of the CIF and PRF is reduced and may become at risk of becoming eroded by inflation. Allocation of gains to other work programmes may not comply with the purpose of the reserve. |
The staff’s recommended option is 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
Being a purely administrative matter, any decisions arising from this report will not have any environmental impact or environmental implications.
2. Financial implications
The manner and extent in which gains are allocated and reinvested will affect the level of future funding available to pay for projects and programmes aligned to the purpose of each reserve, however, the CIF Reserve is the only reserve that has a self-imposed minimum requirement, currently set at $13.5M.
3. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance because it is part of council’s day-to-day activities and is in accordance with the approved Treasury Management Policy.
4. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with council’s Treasury Management Policy, and the 2018–28 Long Term Plan, both of which were approved in accordance with council’s decision-making requirements of sections 76–82 of the Local Government Act 2002. The activities detailed in this report are also in accordance with council’s Opex Reserve Policy.
Being a purely administrative matter, Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.
Background/Tuhinga
1. Externally Managed Investment Funds
Council’s managed fund portfolio generated gains of $8.7M in 2020/21. $1.7M of these gains were used to fund council’s general operations in line with the adopted 2020/21 budget.
The additional $7M of gains are proposed to be utilised as presented in Figure 1.
2. Short Term Fund Investment Fund (STF)
The purpose of the Opex Reserve is to have sufficient funding set aside in liquid assets should the budgeted revenue stream from council’s managed fund portfolio not eventuate as anticipated. It is proposed that $596K of STF gains are transferred to the Opex Reserve to fully align the balance of this reserve with the 2021/22 gains requirement ($2.2M) thereby providing assurance and stability over the delivery of council’s work programmes. The $596K will be invested outside of the managed fund portfolio, and in low risk trading bank term deposits.
3. Long-Term Investment Fund (LTF)
3.1 Community Investment Fund (CIF) Reserve
(To be renamed Economic Development Reserve in 2021/22)
It is proposed that $2,054,194 of surplus gains are reinvested back into the LTF and attributed to the CIF Reserve.
The Infrastructure Facilities Reserve was discontinued as part of council’s 2021-2031 Long Term Plan; therefore, the closing balance of this reserve at 30 June 2021 ($55K) has been transferred into the CIF Reserve.
Council’s position when preparing the 2020/21 Annual Plan was that $1.7M of the capital base of the CIF Reserve would be withdrawn to support the costs of economic development activities, and a further $200K of CIF capital would be withdrawn to support council’s general funding. Neither of these amounts were needed during the year.
Table One summarises the proposed CIF recommendation:
3.2 Property Reinvestment Fund (PRF) Reserve
The purpose of the PRF Reserve is to represent funds set aside to be invested in income producing assets, pending the identification of approved property investments.
It is proposed that $2,303,754 of surplus gains are reinvested back into the LTF and attributed to the PRF Reserve as presented in Table Two:
3.3 Infrastructure Investment Fund (IIF) Reserve
(To be renamed Regional Projects Reserve in 2021/22)
The purpose of the IIF Reserve is to represent funds set aside for approved infrastructure and economic development investments with a view to stabilising the impact of large irregular infrastructure projects on council’s income and capital requirements
The income generated from this reserve represents funds available for operational spend in other activities where needed.
In 2020/21 gains of $903,938 were transferred out of the IIF Reserve to the Enterprise System Replacement Reserve to reduce the overall burden of this project on ratepayers.
It is proposed that $648,915 of surplus gains attributable to the IIF Reserve are transferred to the Equalisation Reserve in 2020/21 to fund projects identified by Councillors during the 2021/22 year. $648,915 will be withdrawn from the LTF and invested into the STF.
Council’s position when preparing the 2020/21 Annual Plan was that $250K of the capital base of the IIF Reserve, and $150K from the Equalisation Reserve, would be required as general funding. In fact, only $350K was required, and gains attributable to the IIF Reserve were utilised instead – preserving council’s capital and the balance of the Equalisation Reserve.
Table three summarises the proposed IIF recommendation:
4. Funding earmarked to repay future debt and capital renewals
Targeted River Rates collected and earmarked to repay debt, and depreciation collected and earmarked to fund river scheme capex renewals, are currently held in the LTF, and represented in the IIF Reserve.
It is recommended that $1,396,084 of 2020/21 targeted rates and $205,066 of 2020/21 depreciation funding are invested into the LTF and attributed to the IIF Reserve. These amounts will add to the corresponding balances already in the LTF resulting in an overall balance of $1,975,520 related to river schemes. ($1,396,084 for debt repayment; $579,436 for capital renewals).
It is recommended that when the IIF reserve is renamed to the Regional Project Reserve in 2021/22, the $1,975,520 of river related funding itemised above plus the $250,000 of debt repayments received from NEST are transferred to a newly established “Debt Repayment and Depreciation Funding” Reserve to maintain visibility and preserve such funding until it is required in the future (next loan matures in August 2032). Any gains and interest generated from funds earmarked for debt repayment will be returned to the corresponding activity that the debt was raised for.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Externally Managed Investment Funds - EriksensGlobal Quarterly Report 30 June 2021 ⇩
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Request for Approval to Carry Forward Operational Budget from the 2020/21 Financial Year into the 2021/22 Financial Year |
From: |
Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 05 August 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
Unspent 2020/21 operational budget of $46,015 is proposed to be carried forward into the 2021/22 financial year to fund the completion of operational projects. The recommendations in this report have been incorporated into the draft operating result of $68,227.
1. That the report ‘Request for Approval to Carry Forward Operational Budget from the 2020/21 Financial Year into the 2021/22 Financial Year’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 2 August 2021, be received.
2. That council approves the operational expenditure carry forwards from the 2020/21 financial year into the 2021/22 financial year of:
a. $9,015 for the electronic swipe card system for Total Mobility (Ridewise);
b. $12,000 for the IHEMP Projects; and
c. $25,000 for the report on feasibility of NRC collecting its own rates.
Background/Tuhinga
As with previous years, carry forwards of unspent 2020/21 operational budgets are required to enable the completion of the various operational projects in the 2021/22 financial year.
Following the 30 June 2021 year-end senior management review, three projects were identified as requiring unspent 2020/21 operational budgets of $46,015 to be carried forward as funding in 2021/22.
The total of $46,015 has been incorporated into the draft operating result. The projects requiring this funding are below by group:
Customer Services
Description |
2020-21 Spent |
2020-21 Budget |
2020-21 Budget Unspent |
Amount to Carry forward |
Electronic swipe card system for Total Mobility (Ridewise) |
11,841 |
20,967 |
9,126 |
9,015 |
· $9,015
for the electronic swipe card system for Total Mobility (Ridewise). The
nationwide Ridewise system is now a build of a new software system rather than
an upgrade. An implementation ready option is still to be scoped and this
has meant a delay in the project delivery. The timeline is now September
21 – November 22. This attracts Waka Kotahi subsidy if utilised and
the value requested is net of this subsidy.
Governance and Engagement
Description |
2020-21 Spent |
2020-21 Budget |
2020-21 Budget Unspent |
Amount to Carry forward |
IHEMP Projects |
6,913 |
26,112 |
19,199 |
12,000 |
· $12,000 for iwi and hapu environmental management plans allocated from the 2020/21 financial year budget but expected to be completed during the 2021/22 financial year. It includes plans for Ngati Toro and Ngati Whatua.
Corporate Services
Description |
2020-21 Spent |
2020-21 Budget |
2020-21 Budget Unspent |
Amount to Carry forward |
Report on feasibility of NRC collecting its own rates |
0 |
25,000 |
25,000 |
25,000 |
· $25,000 for a report on the feasibility of collecting our own rates that was delayed due to the contractor being contracted by NRC for other priority work and not having capacity to complete before the end of the financial year.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Approve carry forward of all requested unspent operational budgets |
Allows the completion of 2020/21 projects. |
Reduces retained earnings though at budgeted levels. |
2 |
Approve no unspent operational budget carry forwards |
Retains more surplus in the 2020/21 financial year. |
Projects from the 2020/21 financial year do not get finished or 2021/22 programmes must be deferred to allow for 2021/22 work already contracted. |
3 |
Approve some of the unspent operational budget carry forwards |
Some projects will go ahead. |
Some projects will not go ahead. Some of the 2021/22 programmes might be deferred to allow for 2020/21 work already contracted. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1 to maintain all contractual work programmes.
Considerations
1. Financial implications
In arriving at the draft operating result of $68,227, $46,015 has been incorporated to represent the proposed operational carry forwards.
2. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.
3. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with the 2018–28 Long Term Plan, which was approved in accordance with council’s decision making requirements of sections 76–82 of the Local Government Act 2002.
Being a purely administrative matter, community views, implementation issues and Māori impact statement are not applicable.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 6.3
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Request for Approval to Carry Forward Capital Expenditure Budget from the 2020/21 Financial Year into the 2021/22 Financial Year |
From: |
Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 11 August 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The purpose of this report is to seek council approval to carry forward seven capital projects totalling $337,593 from the 2020/21 financial year into the 2021/22 financial year.
1. That the report ‘Request for Approval to Carry Forward Capital Expenditure Budget from the 2020/21 Financial Year into the 2021/22 Financial Year’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 2 August 2021, be received.
2. That council approves the carry forward of $337,593 capital expenditure budget from the 2020/21 financial year into the 2021/22 financial year.
Background/Tuhinga
Staff have carried out a final review on any ongoing capital projects and associated Capital Expenditure (Capex) carry forwards for council consideration and approval.
As part of the budget process finance staff ensure that all Capex is adequately funded via depreciation over the expected useful life of each asset class.
Following the 30 June 2021 year-end senior management review, which was based upon the actual Capex incurred and the review of ongoing requirements, a total of $337,593 is proposed to be carried forward into 2021/22 which is entirely general capex (not targeted rate funded).
2020/21 Actual and Budgeted Capital Expenditure
The revised capital expenditure budget for 2020/21 was $15,128,148. The total actual capital expenditure incurred in 2020/21 was $13,557,899, resulting in an underspend of $1.57M. Of this underspend $1.3M relates to commercial property transactions that are funded from the Property Reinvestment Fund. For a breakdown of this please refer to Attachment One.
2021/22 Budgeted Capital Expenditure and Proposed Carry Forwards
The original 2021/22 capital expenditure budget is $18,146,743 and by adding the total requested 2020/21 carry forwards of $337,593 this budget will increase to $18,424,336. The detail of the original 2021/22 capital expenditure programme and the proposed capital carry forwards are presented in Attachment Two.
Explanations to proposed capital carry forward expenditure for 2020/21
CEO and Property: Proposed capital expenditure carry forward $180,126
Approval of $180,126 capital carry forward expenditure is sought:
· For the Water Street building reconfiguration that was underway but wasn’t completed by financial year end. Note that $135K of this was funded from the Covid-19 reinstatement reserve in 2020/21.
Note that $62,669 for the Flyger Road subdivision has not been requested to be
carried forward. NRC’s 50% share of subdivision costs was committed to in
the sale and purchase agreement but is not expected to go ahead until around
2024/25. This will be requested from council nearer to the time that the
work is expected to commence.
Regulatory Services: Proposed capital expenditure carry forward $81,920
Approval of $81,920 capital carry forward expenditure is sought:
· $40,000 for two coastal bores for which the locations were not finalised in time for year end. This is due to the delay in recruitment of a Groundwater Scientist.
· $32,500 for sediment monitoring equipment where there is a lack of consensus nationally on monitoring methodology. While this has delayed the purchasing of this equipment the science team will produce some methodology recommendations that should guide spend in the 2021/22 financial year.
· $9,420 for an air quality monitoring portacom. Delays in the construction have led to this not being finished in the 2020/21 financial year.
Governance and Engagement: Proposed capital expenditure carry forward $16,000
Approval of $16,000 capital carry forward expenditure is sought:
· To complete the purchase of an interactive display kiosk and event equipment. This was delayed in 2020/21 due to the specialised nature of the kiosk and the time and detail required to liaise with suppliers. This asset is also imported from China with the supplier having no control over import speed.
Corporate Services: Proposed capital expenditure carry forward $57,635
Approval of $57,635 capital carry forward expenditure is sought:
· To upgrade the Wi-Fi equipment for NRC's buildings in line with the change to user's having laptops instead of desktop computers. With resourcing focused on supporting the SharePoint project and the cyber-attack the Wi-Fi upgrades have been delayed.
Customer Services: Proposed capital expenditure carry forward $1,912
Approval of $1,912 capital carry forward expenditure is sought:
· To complete the purchase of a trailer for the Ruawai vessel which was not completed by the end of the financial year.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Approve carry forward of all requested capital carry forwards |
Allows the completion of the 2020/21 capital programme. |
Reduces retained earnings at budgeted levels. |
2 |
Approve none of the Capex carry forwards |
Retains more earnings for other capital projects. |
Projects underway or delayed won’t get the required funding to be completed. |
3 |
Approve some of the Capex carry forwards |
Some of the capital projects get to be completed. |
Some of the capital projects don’t get completed. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1. This maintains the unspent capital programme budget from 2020/21 allowing projects that are underway and delayed to be completed.
Considerations
1. Financial implications
$337,593 of capital carried forward from the 2020/21 financial year to the 2021/22 financial year.
2. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.
3. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with the 2018–28 Long Term Plan, which was approved in accordance with council’s decision making requirements of sections 76–82 of the Local Government Act 2002.
Being a purely administrative matter, community views, implementation issues and Māori impact statement are not applicable.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: 2020/21 Actual and Budgeted Capital Expenditure ⇩
Attachment 2: 2021/22 Budgeted Capital Expenditure and Proposed Carry Forwards ⇩
Council Meeting item: 6.4
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Draft Financial Result to 30 June 2021 |
From: |
Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 05 August 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
The purpose of this report is to present the draft financial result for the year ending 30 June 2021 for councillors’ information. The draft result of $68,227 is provisional. There may be further adjustments and amendments as the year-end reconciliations are reviewed by senior staff and the statutory financial statements (including notes) for the draft Annual Report are prepared. There may also be amendments arising from council decisions. Deloitte is scheduled to commence their three-week on-site audit on 23 August 2021.
This result excludes $24.1M of non-cash revaluation gains to investment properties, forestry assets and other financial assets. Taking these non-cash revaluation gains into account and the movements in the special reserves, the statutory financial statements within the annual report will present a total Comprehensive Revenue and Expense of approximately $33.3M.
The final Annual Report to be provided to council on 19 October 2021 for adoption. The Annual Report will provide detailed funding impact statements by activity group and full detailed explanations of any material variance.
For the Draft Operating Result for Council refer to Attachment 1.
That the report ‘Draft Financial Result to 30 June 2021’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 3 August 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
Financial results
The provisional Net Surplus after Transfers to and from Special Reserves and excluding non-cash items is $68K compared to a budgeted surplus of $32K.
The main variances to the revised budget presented in Attachment 1 are explained below:
Revenue
· User Fees and Sundry has a favourable variance (better than budget) of $585K or 15% which is due to higher than budgeted consent monitoring fees of $357K, higher than budgeted maritime recoveries of $84K, unbudgeted prosecutions income of $76K, higher than budgeted poplar nursery sales of $52K, and higher than budgeted consent fees of $47K. This is partially offset by lower than budgeted bus fare revenue of ($249K).
· Grants and Subsidies has a favourable balance (better than budget) of $3.13M or 32%. This variance is predominantly due to unbudgeted provincial development unit subsidies for flood infrastructure of $2.49M, unbudgeted subsidies for the wilding conifer projects of $2.34M, unbudgeted subsidies for NTA staff of $395K, unbudgeted subsidies for an animal welfare drought response of $250K, unbudgeted subsidies for the water storage project of $250K, and unbudgeted subsidies for council’s response to regional emergencies of $177K. This is offset by lower than budgeted subsidies on the Kauri Boardwalk project of ($1.22M) and lower than budgeted subsidies on the predator free programme of ($1.02M).
· Interest Revenue has a favourable variance (better than budget) of $132K or 76% which is due to unbudgeted REL loan interest of $86K which is offset with a provision and unbudgeted interest on various term deposits of $34K.
· Other Revenue has a favourable variance (better than budget) of $2.00M or 43% which is due to higher than budgeted Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited dividends of $2.05M.
· Other gains have a favourable variance (better than budget) of $6.98M or 386% which is primarily due to higher than budgeted gains on the externally managed funds of $6.84M. The details for 2020/21 externally managed funds are the subject of agenda item 6.1.
Expenditure
· Personnel Costs – Salaries has a favourable variance (expenditure less than budget) of $541K or 3% due to general delays in filling LTP and AP budgeted positions.
· Personnel Costs – Other has an unfavourable variance (expenditure exceeding budget) of ($120K) or (11%) predominantly due to an increase in annual and flexi leave balances of ($102K).
· Other Expenditure has an unfavourable variance (expenditure more than budget) of ($110K) or (0%).
Expenditure variances offset with fees, grants or subsidies:
- Unbudgeted expenditure for a wilding conifer project of ($2.39M)
- Unbudgeted expenditure on an animal welfare drought response of ($250K)
- Higher than budgeted costs relating to consenting activities of ($246K)
- Unbudgeted regional emergency response costs of ($82K)
Offset by:
- Lower than budgeted expenditure on the predator free programme of $977K
- Lower than budgeted expenditure on the Kauri boardwalk project of $1.26M
Expenditure variances offset with reserve movements:
- More than budgeted sporting facilities rate grants of ($194K)
- Lower than budgeted costs on council’s new enterprise system of $149K
- Lower than budgeted economic development grants of $250K
- Lower than budgeted stop bank and river scheme maintenance of $282K due to the river team focusing on PDU funded capital works this financial year
Other expenditure variances:
- Higher than budgeted legal fees relating to the regional plan of ($319K)
- Impairment on investment of Regional Software Holdings Limited to reflect the early exit on the underlying asset (IRIS) of ($194K)
- Higher than budgeted costs on council’s IT services of ($185K)
- Unbudgeted contribution to the removal of hazardous materials from the Sustainable Solvents site of ($100K)
- Lower than budgeted training of $114K
- Lower than budgeted provision for doubtful debts and bad debts on rates of $822K
· Depreciation and Amortisation has a favourable variance (expenditure less than budget) of $204K or 11% predominantly due to the disposal of council’s computer hardware during the year from a switch to a computer lease model of delivery.
· Finance costs have a favourable variance (expenditure less than budget) of $210K or 27% predominantly due to council receiving PDU funding on its FIR programme meaning that it didn’t have to incur additional borrowing as originally budgeted.
Reserves
The net transfer to the Special Reserves is $13.93M greater than budget (more funds transferred into the reserves) predominantly due to the higher than budgeted transfers to council’s externally managed fund reserves representing reinvestment of gains of $4.54M, higher than budgeted transfers to the Flood Infrastructure Reserves of $2.55M due to unbudgeted PDU funding, lower than budgeted transfers from the Community Investment Fund Reserve of $2.02M due to utilising other funding sources during the year, unbudgeted transfers of surplus dividends and Infrastructure Investment Fund gains to the Enterprise System Reserve of $1.55M, lower than budgeted transfers from the Equalisation Reserve of $930K due to being able to use other funding sources, an unbudgeted transfer of $649K of IIF gains to the Equalisation Reserve, an unbudgeted transfer of $614K to the Opex Reserve, and lower Investment and Growth Reserve movements for the Northland Inc. projects of $530K. Further detail on the Special Reserves is provided in agenda item 6.5.
Capital Expenditure
Total capital expenditure for the year was $13.56M which is $1.47M less than the $15.13M revised annual budget. A detailed breakdown of capital expenditure variances and proposed carry forwards is provided in agenda item 6.3.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Draft Operating Statement for Council June 2021.pdf ⇩
Council Meeting item: 6.5
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Special Reserves at 30 June 2021 |
From: |
Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 11 August 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
At 30 June 2021, council has $30.61M of special reserves set aside to cover expenditure on specific projects and work programmes.
This report provides a breakdown of the special reserves held by council, including their purpose and balance as at 30 June 2021.
That the report ‘Special Reserves at 30 June 2021’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 4 August 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
The equity in council’s balance sheet represents the communities’ interest in council and is measured by the value of total assets less total liabilities. Equity is classified into a number of general and special reserves to enable a clearer identification of the specified uses for which various funds have been assigned.
A general reserve does not have a specific purpose, whereas a special reserve holds funds that are set aside to cover expenditure on specific projects. In addition, special reserves may facilitate the funding of works of an inter-generational nature, capital expenditure in particular, over the most appropriate time period.
The special reserves and their respective balances (surplus/(deficit)) in place at the end of the 2020/21 financial year are as follows:
Description |
Closing Balance |
Land Management Reserve |
265,445 |
Awanui River Reserve |
(273,317) |
Awanui River FIR Reserve |
(230,348) |
Kāeo River Reserve |
216,549 |
Kāeo River FIR Reserve |
38,128 |
Whangārei Urban River Reserve |
(8,131,193) |
Whangārei River FIR Reserve |
47,700 |
Infrastructure Investment Fund Reserve |
16,649,598 |
Kaihu River Reserve |
47,785 |
Waipapa Kerikeri River Reserve |
363,699 |
Flood Infrastructure Reserve |
(2,031,765) |
Infrastructure Facilities Reserve |
0 |
Property Reinvestment Fund Reserve |
14,805,276 |
Equalisation Reserve |
2,095,397 |
Hātea River Reserve |
99,880 |
Investment and Growth Reserve |
1,121,601 |
Approved Carry Forwards - General Funds |
181,015 |
Whangārei Bus and TM Reserve |
(126,469) |
Emergency Services Reserve |
70,285 |
Far North Transport Reserve |
338,337 |
LIDAR Project Reserve |
11,472 |
Regional Sporting Facilities Reserve |
1,255,272 |
Opex Reserve |
2,233,374 |
Enterprise System Reserve |
1,553,584 |
Capital Subsidy Reserve |
8,148 |
Total Special Reserves |
30,609,555 |
Some special reserves earn or are charged interest depending on their closing balance being in deficit or surplus. For the 2020/21 year the protocol is for reserves in surplus of $50,000 or greater earn interest at 3.28% (as per STF SIPO of 3% plus the 90 day bank bill rate). Reserves in deficit are either charged at the corresponding external borrowing rate or at the internal rate of 3.93% (based on the average cost of council’s external borrowing).
A description of the purpose of each reserve, the transfers from and/or to the reserve for the year, and the closing balance of each reserve as at 30 June 2021 is provided below.
Land Management Reserve
The Land Management Reserve was created to allow council to set aside unutilised Land Management rates for the purpose of funding projects in future years.
The operational reserve movements of $250,764 to the Land Management Reserve constitute NRC funding of Freshwater Improvement Fund projects. This produces a closing balance of $265,445.
In 2021/22 the balance of the land management reserve is expected to be fully utilised on Freshwater Improvement Fund projects.
Awanui River Reserve
The Awanui River Reserve was created to hold any targeted Awanui River Management rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls for river works required as part of the Awanui River Flood Management Scheme.
In the 2020/21 financial year the Awanui River Management project had an operating surplus of $288,429 resulting in a closing reserve balance of ($273,317). Unused accumulated depreciation of $224,593 is held in the LTF IIF portion resulting in a closing cash balance of ($48,724).
Awanui Flood Infrastructure Rate (FIR) Reserve
The Awanui FIR Reserve was created to hold any targeted Awanui FIR rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls for river works required as part of the Awanui River Flood Management Scheme. The Awanui FIR Reserve incorporates 30% of any related capital works with the other 70% being attributed to the Flood Infrastructure Rate Reserve.
In the 2020/21 financial year the Awanui FIR project had an operating surplus of $860,437. Capital expenditure of $902,920 was incurred producing a closing reserve deficit of ($230,348).
Whangaroa Kaeo Rivers Reserve
The Whangaroa Kaeo Rivers Reserve was created to hold any targeted Whangaroa Kaeo Rivers Management rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls of river works required as part of the Whangaroa Kaeo Rivers Flood Management scheme.
In the 2020/21 financial year there was an operating deficit of ($20,039) resulting in a closing reserve balance of $216,549. Unused accumulated depreciation of $27,937 is held in the LTF IIF portion resulting in a closing cash balance of $244,937.
Kāeo Flood Infrastructure Rate (FIR) Reserve
The Kāeo FIR Reserve was created to hold any targeted Kāeo FIR rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls for river works required as part of the Kāeo River Flood Management Scheme. The Kāeo FIR reserve incorporates 30% of any related capital works with the other 70% being attributed to the Flood Infrastructure Rate Reserve.
In the 2020/21 financial year the Kāeo FIR project had an operating surplus of $21,426. Capital expenditure of $6,474 was incurred producing a closing reserve surplus of $38,128.
Whangārei Urban Rivers Reserve
The Whangārei Urban Rivers Reserve was created in the 2011/12 year to hold any targeted Whangārei Urban Rivers Management rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls of river works required as part of the Whangārei urban rivers management scheme.
The operating surplus of $420,223 has been transferred to the reserve which produces a deficit balance of ($8,131,193). Adding the unused accumulated depreciation of $326,907 held in the LTF IIF portion gives a cash balance of ($7,804,286).
Whangārei FIR Reserve
The Whangārei Flood Infrastructure Rate (FIR) Reserve was created to hold any targeted Whangārei FIR rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls for river works required as part of the Whangārei River Flood Management Scheme. The Whangārei FIR reserve incorporates 30% of any related capital works with the other 70% being attributed to the Flood Infrastructure Rate Reserve.
In the 2020/21 financial year the Whangārei FIR project had an operating surplus of $60,373 producing a closing reserve surplus of $47,700.
Infrastructure Investment Fund (IIF) Reserve
The IIF Reserve was established to stabilise the impact of irregular large infrastructure projects on council’s income and capital requirements. It will help to spread the costs of such projects. The fund is also intended to provide more flexibility around when such large capital intensive projects can commence.
The balance of the reserve represents funds held in the LTF IIF portion. No gains are proposed to be reinvested this financial year. The large capital transfer relates to the repayment of borrowings after the sale of the rail corridor assets last financial year and rates collected on the river reserves decreased our required level of borrowing. The IIF Reserve retains $579,437 of unutilised accumulated depreciation and $1,396,084 of capital repayments collected and held to repay external borrowings.
Kaihu River Reserve
The Kaihu River Reserve was created to hold any targeted Kaihu River Management rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls for river works required as part of the Kaihu River Flood Management Scheme.
In the 2020/21 financial year there was an operating surplus of $7,477 transferred to the reserve producing a closing balance of $47,785.
Kerikeri–Waipapa Rivers Reserve
The Kerikeri–Waipapa Rivers Reserve is set up to hold any targeted Kerikeri–Waipapa rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls of river works required as part of the flood risk reduction project for the Kerikeri–Waipapa area.
The Kerikeri–Waipapa targeted rate was discontinued in 2020/21 resulting in an operating deficit of ($26,537) and capital expenditure of $39,980 which has been transferred from the reserve producing a closing balance of $363,699.
Flood Infrastructure Rate (FIR) Reserve
The FIR Reserve was created to hold any targeted regional FIR rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls for river works required as part of Northland Flood Infrastructure Schemes. The FIR reserve incorporates 70% of any related capital works with the other 30% being attributed to the Awanui FIR, Whangārei FIR, or Kāeo FIR reserves depending on the particular project.
In the 2020/21 financial year the FIR reserve had an operating surplus of $2,238,148 and $2,499,888 of capital expenditure producing a closing reserve deficit of ($2,031,765).
Infrastructure Facilities Reserve
The Infrastructure Facilities Reserve was created to set aside any targeted Regional Infrastructure rates collected and not fully utilised in any given year for the purpose of funding future infrastructure projects.
In 2020/21 $166,125 of rates funding has been transferred into the reserve producing a closing balance of $0.
Property Reinvestment Fund Reserve
This reserve was established to represent the proceeds of commercial property sales and acquisitions and includes the proceeds of a special dividend (capital) payment made by Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited. The reserve represents property reinvestment funds invested in council's long-term and short-term investment funds that are set aside to be reinvested in income-producing assets, pending the identification of approved property investments.
During 2020/21 this reserve recognised $2,303,754 of reinvested gains and withdrawals of $8,931,795 for commercial developments leaving a closing balance of $14,805,276.
Equalisation Reserve
The Equalisation Reserve was created to set aside council’s forestry net income arising in any harvesting year. This reserve is intended to provide future funding of council’s general activities by allowing council to use these funds for any council activity to smooth future rating increases. Additionally this fund can be used to fund the cost of forestry operations in non-harvesting years.
During the 2020/21 financial year $256,000 of surplus dividends were transferred into the reserve to offset an expected reduction in 2021/22 pilotage income and $648,915 of IIF gains were transferred into this reserve to fund projects identified by councillors during the 2021/22 year. Operational transfers from the reserve of $272,604 for forestry work, LTP audit costs, and by-election costs resulting in a closing reserve balance of $2,095,397.
Hātea River Reserve
The Hātea River Reserve was created to set aside a component of the council’s Services Rate ($1.50+GST) specifically levied across the Whangārei constituency to ensure funding is available in the event dredging of the Hātea River is required.
This year there was an operating deficit of ($64,711) transferred to the reserve producing a closing reserve balance of $99,880.
Emergency Services Reserve
The Emergency Services Reserve was created to hold any targeted Emergency Services rates collected and unspent in any given year to ensure all collected rates go to emergency services in the future.
The closing balance of $70,285 represents targeted rates collected (and adjusted for non-collection) and not allocated to date.
Investment and Growth Reserve
The Northland Regional Council Investment and Growth Reserve was established in 2011/12. The reserve was created to set aside investment income to fund activities and projects that contribute towards the economic well-being of Northland.
The investment in the Long Term Investment Fund relating to the Community Investment Fund will represent a newly established reserve named the Economic Development Reserve on 1 July 2021 with an opening balance of $17,264,025.
Approved Carry Forwards Reserve
The Approved Carry Forwards Reserve was set up to record operational projects for council that have not been completed during the current year and need to be carried forward to the next financial year. This is the subject of agenda Item 6.2. At 30 June 2021 the closing balance of the operational projects proposed to be carried forward is $46,015. The carry forward reserve is also holding $135,000 of the Whangārei office changes capital expenditure carry forward (refer agenda item 6.4) which was originally funded from the Covid-19 reinstatement reserve.
Whangārei Transport Reserve
The Whangārei Transport Reserve was created to hold any targeted Whangārei Transport rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls in the Whangārei bus and total mobility programmes.
In 2020/21 Whangārei Bus made a deficit of ($110,946) and Total Mobility made a surplus of $24,437. This resulted in $86,509 being transferred from the reserve making the reserve balance a deficit of ($126,469). The negative reserve movement is predominately due to lower than budgeted Whangārei Citylink fare box income and higher than budgeted Whangarei bus CPI costs in the 2020/21 year. Had these variances not occurred the operational result would have been a surplus and would have reduced the value of the opening balance.
Far North Transport Reserve
The Far North Bus Service Reserve was created to hold any targeted Far North Transport rates collected and unspent in any given year to cover any future funding shortfalls of the Mid North Link, Hokianga Link, and Far North Link programmes.
$117,247 was transferred to the reserve during 2020/21 resulting in a closing balance of $338,337.
LIDAR Reserve
The LIDAR Reserve was created to hold any LIDAR contributions as this project is run over a number of years and includes funding from seven parties.
The reserve balance at 30 June 2021 is $11,472 which is unchanged from last year.
Regional Sporting Facilities Reserve
The Regional Sporting Facilities Reserve was established to set aside any targeted Regional Sporting Facilities rates collected and not fully utilised in any given year for the purpose of funding sporting facilities across Northland.
During the 2020/21 year $1,530,000 of grants were distributed and $1,378,511 of unspent rates were transferred to the reserve resulting in a closing balance of $1,255,272.
Opex Reserve
The Opex Reserve was established in June 2019 with a purpose (and cash holdings it represents) to ensure that the portion of annual operating costs in any financial year that is intended to be funded from managed fund gains is guaranteed and not exposed to market volatility.
Interest earned on the related term deposits of $17,327 and $596,453 of the 2020/21 surplus has been transferred to the reserve resulting in a closing balance of $2,233,374. This fully aligns the reserve to the gains required for general funding in the 2021/22 financial year to provide stability and assurance over the delivery of contracted work programmes in 2021/22.
Enterprise System Reserve
The Enterprise system reserve was established to put aside surplus investment income in order to offset the expected future cost of the enterprise system project. In 2021/22 the reserve will include rates and any expenditure relating to the enterprise system project.
During the 2020/21 financial year $1,553,584 of investment income was transferred into this reserve.
COVID-19 Reinstatement Reserve
The COVID Reinstatement Reserve was established in June 2020. The purpose of this reserve (and cash holdings it represents) was to reinstate works removed from the 2020/21 annual plan with $1,700,000 of the 2019/20 surplus. This reserve was mostly utilised during 2020/21 with the balance coming back to general funding.
Capital Subsidy Reserve
There is $8,148 of subsidy received held in this reserve to partially offset future depreciation costs associated with the Regional Integrated Ticketing Information System (RITIS).
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 6.6
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Regional Rates Collection 2020/21 |
ID: |
|
From: |
Simon Crabb, Finance Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 05 August 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
In 2020/21 all three district councils had an improvement in their collection percentage of current year rates when compared to the prior year.
The level of outstanding rates in the Far North has increased from $1.62M to $2.49M. This is due to the reversal of the estimated rate write-offs booked over the past six years (via the MFL impairment) and then processing the actual write-offs undertaken by MFL in accordance with the Local Government (Rating of Whenua Māori) Amendment Act 2021. Offsetting the rise in Far North’s outstanding rates is an increase in the provision for the prospect of their non-collection. All these adjustments to update the state of the outstanding rates in the Far North were at no cost to council’s 2020/21 bottom line.
Table One below summarises the level of rates collected in 2020/21, the outstanding rate balances at year end, and the provisions held to offset the prospect of non-collection of outstanding rates.
That the report ‘Regional Rates Collection 2020/21’ by Simon Crabb, Finance Manager and dated 13 July 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
Confirmation of council’s rates transactions and outstanding rate balances for 2020/21 are provided by each district council as part of the year-end Annual Report process.
1. Current Year Rates
In 2020/21 council received $33.9M of the annual rate strike, equivalent to 92.1% (2019/20: 91.5%). The three-year average current year rates collection rate has remained in line with last year at 92%.
Attachment One is the 2020/21 Rates Reconciliation Statement. This reconciliation summarises council’s rate strike, cash received, remissions, write-offs, penalties charged, and includes the reversal of the accumulated Māori Freehold Land (MFL) impairment adjustments made over the past six years.
Graph One presents the proportion of current year rates that has been collected by each district council over the past six years.
2. The Local Government (Rating of Whenua Māori) Amendment Act 2021
On 12 April 2021, the Local Government (Rating of Whenua Māori) Amendment Act was enacted. This Act effectively removes from the rating system those properties that could never reasonably be used for economic purpose – either business or residential. From 1 July 2021 any rates owing on this type of land is written off and the land becomes non-rateable.
In the Far North, $2.2M ($1.9 GST exclusive) of unpaid rates and penalties were written off in 2020/21 as a result of the Local Government (Rating of Whenua Māori) Amendment Act. Essentially these write offs have officially achieved what council has been doing via its annual MFL impairment adjustments. Council has previously taken a prudent and conservative stance by booking annual MFL impairments, effectively offsetting the impact of the Far North write offs processed in 2020/21.
The process of making annual MFL impairments will discontinue from 2020/21, and the allowance to offset uncollected rates in the future will be made entirely through the doubtful debt provision.
3. Rate Arrears
Outstanding rate arrears (including penalty arrears) collected in 2020/21 totalled $1,27M, equivalent to a collection rate of 21.9% (2019/20: 21.2%). The three-year average rate arrears collection rate has improved to 19.6% (2019/20 18.1%).
Graph Two presents the proportion of outstanding rate arrears that has been collected by each district council over the past six years.
4. Provision for Doubtful Rate Debts
Table three provides a breakdown of the provision for doubtful rates debts which is an allowance held to offset the potential loss arising from the non-collection of some of the outstanding rates..
The Far North’s outstanding rates balance has increased to $2.49M (2019/20: $1.62M), however there is a corresponding provision of $2.18M for the prospect of not collecting these arrears which represents 87.5% of the outstanding rates balance (2019/20 85.9%).
As an indication, if the district councils did not collect any NRC rate arrears council would be exposed to a loss of $840K, as this is the amount of outstanding rates that are not covered by the provision.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: 2020/21 Rates Reconciliation Statement ⇩
Council Meeting item: 6.7
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Review of Non-Elected Members' Allowance Policy |
ID: |
|
From: |
Ben Lee, GM - Strategy, Governance and Engagement |
Authorised by Group Manager: |
Ben Lee, GM - Strategy, Governance and Engagement, on 12 August 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga | Executive Summary
This paper presents proposed amendments to the Non-elected Members’ Allowance Policy (the Policy) following a review focused primarily on remuneration rates. This review was triggered by changes requested by members of the Tangata Whenua Water Advisory Group (TWWAG) and the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee (JCCAC), as well as other improvements that bring the policy up to date. Earlier versions have been discussed in Te Taitokerau Māori and Council (TTMAC), council workshop, and council has already approved an interim increase in meeting allowances from $170 to $188 whilst a review was undertaken.
Attached to this paper is the Policy showing the proposed changes as tracked changes. Key changes are:
1. Increase in meeting allowance from $188 to $240 (members) or $300 (chairs/co-chairs) and recognition that members need also to spend time to prepare for and follow up after, as well as attending meetings.
2. Addition of allowance for travel time aligned with the council’s Elected Members’ Allowances Policy.
3. Inclusion of a mileage claim cap of 500km/meeting in the policy to replace the practice of paying mileage only for that within the region.
1. That the report ‘Review of Non-Elected Members' Allowance Policy’ by Ben Lee, GM - Strategy, Governance and Engagement and dated 5 July 2021, be received.
2. That council adopt the changes to the Non-Elected Members’ Allowance Policy as set out in Attachment 1 to the report review of Non-Elected Members’ Allowance Policy.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Amend the policy as proposed |
Changes represent a significant increase in remuneration and are much better aligned with rates of other councils and institutions. |
Some tangata whenua may be unhappy with the remuneration rates proposed as these are less than requested and be reluctant to participate in council processes. Will be an increase in costs to council but estimated to be within existing budgets. |
2 |
Do not amend the policy |
Less impact on existing budgets. |
Tangata whenua may be unhappy with the remuneration rates remaining at $188/mtg and choose to disengage. |
3 |
Delay amending the policy pending further review |
Alternative funding models could be more fully explored. |
Resultant rates may remain similar to those proposed in any regard. Further delay in having an agreed non-elected members’ allowance policy could result in continued frustration being experienced by those claiming under the policy. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
This decision relates to remuneration of non-elected members appointed to various committees and working groups who assist council in its various functions, including resource management and climate change; it does not directly impact on the environment. However, council’s ability to perform its functions without strong working relationships with tangata whenua in particular could be considered potentially impacted (see 3 below).
2. Community views
See 3 below. Broader community views have not been canvassed.
3. Māori impact statement
This is clearly a matter of concern to tangata whenua as requests from tangata whenua to various council forums for increased remuneration and recognition of the work done by non-elected members triggered the review of this policy. See the body of the report for further discussion.
4. Financial implications
The suggested changes to the policy have direct financial implications, in particular for the Māori Relationships, and to a lesser extent Policy & Planning (TWWAG) and Climate Change (JCCAC) budgets. The ability for the proposed rates to be accommodated within the existing Māori Relationships budget in the LTP has been one of the key drivers.
There are also direct financial implications for those using the policy to claim for participation in council workshops and meetings. The meeting allowance rate is a significant increase from the $170 previously remunerated. The policy also recompenses time spent travelling to meetings/workshops and mileage of up to 500km regardless of whether that is within the region or not. The proposed amendments all represent positive financial implications compared to the status quo, albeit less than sought by tangata whenua.
It has been estimated that the increase in allowances can be met by existing budgets. The Māori Relationships budget covers all TTMAC non-elected representative allowances payments (which is the vast majority of payments). The 2021/2022 Māori Relationships budget non-elected members allowances budget is approximately $89,000. The budget will cover the proposed allowance assuming a 70% attendance rate (the attendance rate over the last year is closer to 50%). Staff believe that for budgeting purposes, the assumed attendance rate should not be assumed to be any less than 70%. In other words, the proposed increased allowances are the maximum that can be accommodated in this year’s budget, and any further increase would require more budget.
5. Implementation issues
As this policy has been reviewed in light of a request to align remuneration policies across councils in Te Taitokerau, there are also potential implications for FNDC and KDC, who are also following the Policy review being undertaken by council with the intent to make similar policy decisions themselves. WDC has indicated it wishes to retain its current remuneration policy. All three councils have been kept updated of the proposed amendments throughout the review and have provided feedback.
One of the requests received was for consideration of the use of automatic payments based on meeting attendance records kept by the meeting secretary/administrator without the need for submission of meeting claim forms. This is WDC’s current practice for payment of its Te Kārearea hāpu representatives. As this is possible and poses no issue from an implementation perspective, amendments to the policy have been included to provide for this option should members choose.
The quantum and scope of remuneration proposed are not what was requested by TWWAG. Whilst the meeting allowance rate is close to the $250/meeting sought, the policy amendments do not go as far as including remuneration for work done outside of meetings, albeit specific contracts to provide for such remuneration are being explored with TWWAG. Individuals affected by the policy also have the right to choose not to claim, or claim within the limits of the policy, or to disengage in council’s processes.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to s.79 of the LGA 2002, this decision is considered low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy, because the costs can be incorporated within existing budgets and there are no material changes to levels of service.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
This decision relates to amending an existing council policy, to both bring it up to date and to increase remuneration rates for meeting allowances. Whilst not governed by the Local Government Members’ Determination (2019/20), changes proposed are generally consistent with this legislation.
Tuhinga | Background
This paper presents suggested amendments to the Non-elected Members’ Allowance Policy following a review of the policy focused on amending remuneration rates which have not been updated for some time (as noted in council’s decision at its 18 May meeting to increase the rate to $188 in the intervening period whilst a more fulsome review was undertaken).
The review focused specifically on changes requested by members of the TWWAG and raised at the JCCAC in regard to both meeting allowance rates and scope, as well as a request for payment for work that may be done outside of meetings by members, as discussed at the council workshop on 25 May.
The review included comparison of remuneration paid by other councils (see summary table below), as well as consideration of different methodologies for determining remuneration rates, eg. use of scoring systems to determine rates for each committee or working group based on various criteria as well as fixed rates based on budget projections (as per the existing policy).
The review also considered other amendments that would improve clarity, or that bring the policy up to date with government guidance.
Comparison of Selected Council Remuneration Rates for Non-elected Members
Council |
Meeting allowance |
Mileage |
Travel time |
Comment |
EBoP |
$200/mtg |
$0.79/km |
$37.50/hr |
Pay for road tolls and other expenses as well. |
Auckland |
$90-$120/hr |
|
|
Pay for parking fees. No standard rate but most working groups have limit of $600/mtg, some departments pay between $600-$1,200/hui participant. |
Greater Wellington |
$400/mtg |
|
|
Allowance is inclusive of travel and meeting preparation time. |
Kapiti Coast |
Member $206/mtg Chair $294/mtg |
|
|
Allowance is based on 5.5 hrs/mtg, including preparation time. |
Kaipara |
Member $50/hr Chair $75/hr |
IRD rate |
|
Maximum claim 3 hrs/mtg. Both iwi also receive annual payments to cover participation. |
Tauranga City |
$170/mtg |
|
|
Also koha and other recognition at GM / Project Manager discretion. |
Whangārei |
$280/mtg |
$0.79/km |
$37.50/hr |
For hapū representatives’ participation in Te Karere. |
Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board |
Member $275/mtg Chair $360/mtg |
$0.74/km |
|
Additional payments can be claimed for accommodation, meals, flights and parking within limits. |
Kaipara Moana Remediation |
$425/mtg |
|
|
|
The TWWAG has considered this matter since its inaugural meeting in January and requested council to increase meeting allowances to $250/meeting plus additional payments of $70/hr for work done outside of meetings. As council staff and TWWAG members have worked through the group’s Terms of Reference (ToR), which includes remuneration rates as set out in the Policy, TWWAG have consistently reinforced their request.
Hapū representatives also noted in the JCCAC the need for increased recognition of and value accorded to tangata whenua by councils and requested alignment in remuneration rates across councils wherever possible, as well as use of online transactions to remove the need for time-consuming paperwork.
Currently, iwi and hapū representatives and tangata whenua appointments to council’s committees or working parties/groups are those affected by this policy. Whilst this policy could apply to other community representatives, it is tangata whenua who currently claim under the Policy, including TTMAC, the Māori Technical Advisory Group (MTAG) and TWWAG.
TTMAC did not oppose an earlier version of the proposed amendments and highlighted the importance of the relationship between tangata whenua and council and the need for due recognition and equity.
Not amending the policy could result in dissatisfaction amongst those already appointed to council committees and working groups. Such a decision could also result in reluctance of Treaty partners and key community members to participate in council forums, thus reducing the valuable input that they have to council’s work and impacting negatively on council’s relationships with tangata whenua in particular.
Acknowledgement that council greatly values the relationship with tangata whenua and community representatives is fundamental to council’s ability to perform its functions effectively and efficiently. The proposed increase in remuneration goes some way towards recognising this.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Non-elected Members Allowance Policy ⇩
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Environmental Fund Over Allocation |
From: |
Ruben Wylie, Land Management Programme Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Jonathan Gibbard, Group Manager - Environmental Services, on 04 August 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
This report seeks approval for the annual over allocation of targeted aspects of the Environment Fund budget by 20%, to ensure withdrawals and underspends are accounted for to enable full use of available budget.
1. That the report ‘Environmental Fund Over Allocation’ by Ruben Wylie, Land Management Programme Manager and dated 2 August 2021, be received.
2. That for 2021/22 council approves an over-allocation of the general Land/Biodiversity component of the Environment Fund (not including commitments to the nursery) budget ($601,114) by up to 20% ($120,222).
OptionsOver-allocation
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Provide an over allocation based on 20% of the general 2021/2022 land/biodiversity Environment Fund budget |
Ensures greater utilisation of the Environment Fund budget by reducing the impact of withdrawals and underspends. |
If withdrawals and underspends are less than 20% then there will be an unfavourable variation to year end budget.
|
2 |
Decline the 20% over allocation of the general 2021/2022 environment fund budget |
No risk of the fund being over-allocated due to reduced withdrawals and underspends. |
The withdrawals and underspends mean that the total Environment Fund is not all spent, and less environmental benefit is achieved. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan and/or is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
2. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with council’s 2021–31 Long Term Plan which was approved in accordance with council’s decision-making requirements of sections 76–82 of the Local Government Act 2002.
The risks that we aim to mitigate are the underutilisation of the Environment Fund budget caused by underspends and withdrawals and inconsistencies in allocation of the fund. There is also a financial risk, and this is outlined under consideration 6 below.
3. Community views
The community is very concerned about improving water quality in our region. The proposed over allocation will support those aspirations, by ensuring the total grant budget is spent on projects with the highest environmental benefit.
4. Māori impact statement
Tangata whenua value freshwater quality very highly and our proposed changes will continue to support their aspirations for improvements in this area. Tangata whenua will continue to be able to access the environment fund, no matter the type of ownership structure of the whenua.
5. Financial implications
There is the potential of an unfavourable variation to year end budget if withdrawn or underspent projects are less than the recommended over-allocation of 20%.
No. |
Scenario |
Situation |
Financial implication |
1 |
Current scenario |
No additional over-allocation of budget is authorised. |
The Environment Fund budget is underspent due to withdrawals and underspends. If this were 20% of the general land/biodiversity Environment Fund budget, this would result in an unfavourable variation of $120,222. |
2 |
Worst case |
20% additional budget is allocated to account for withdrawals or underspends, but no withdrawals or underspends occur. |
$120,222 unfavourable variation to land/biodiversity Environment Fund budget. |
3 |
Most likely scenario |
Based on the six-year average of 20% of underspends and withdrawals, it is likely that close to 20% of the total budget will be withdrawn or underspent. |
Limited variation to budget. For example, a 5% variance to the land/biodiversity Environment Fund budget would be $30,055. |
If an unfavourable variance to budget occurs, then this would need to be serviced from any potential year end surplus or subsequent years’ Environment Fund (that is any overspend will go against an Environment Fund reserve to be repaid in the following year from the Environment Fund budget). However, the 20% six-year average for underspends and withdrawals indicates that a substantial unfavourable variance to budget is unlikely.
6. Implementation issues
No additional implementation issues are perceived
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Nil
Council Meeting item: 7.2
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Freshwater farm plan regulations and Stock exclusion regulations: Proposed changes to the low slope map – Discussion Documents |
From: |
Ruben Wylie, Land Management Programme Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Jonathan Gibbard, Group Manager - Environmental Services, on 11 August 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
On 14 July 2021, the Government released two discussion documents for consultation. One details options for how freshwater farm plan regulations will be developed under part 9A of the Resource Management Amendment Act 2020. The other, details proposed changes to the low slope map developed for the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020. The Government is seeking feedback on both proposals simultaneously, with the consultation period set to end on 12 September 2021.
At the time of writing, staff had yet to fully assess the two discussion documents or develop draft submissions. It is recommended that council lodge a submission, based on the key submission points listed within this report, and this item provides recommendations to approve a submission under delegated authority.
1. That the report ‘Freshwater farm plan regulations and Stock exclusion regulations: Proposed changes to the low slope map – Discussion Documents’ by Ruben Wylie, Land Management Programme Manager and dated 3 August 2021, be received.
2. That council approve the lodgement of a submission on the Freshwater farm plan regulations and Stock exclusion regulations: Proposed changes to the low slope map, in line with the key submission points outlined in this report.
3. That council delegates authority to the Chief Executive Officer to approve the final content and lodgement of a submission on the Freshwater farm plan regulations and Stock exclusion regulations: Proposed changes to the low slope map on behalf of council.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Council does not lodge a submission on the proposed regulations |
No staff resource required. |
The Government does not receive council’s views on the proposed regulations and its applicability in Northland. |
2 |
Staff input into submissions by others on the proposed regulations (e.g. Regional Sector) |
Council’s views are included to some degree in submissions by other parties. Minimal staff resource required. |
Council’s views on the applicability of the proposals in Northland may not be expressed as clearly or strongly. |
3 |
Council lodges a submission on the proposed regulations under delegated authority |
Council’s views on the initial draft are made available to the Government early in the process. |
Minor staff resource required. |
Staff recommend Option 3. These proposals will have direct impacts on Northland’s rural community, environmental outcomes and council’s role and responsibilities.
Considerations
1. Environmental impact
There is no environmental impact associated with the decision on whether or not to lodge a submission on the discussion documents.2. Community views
Communities in Northland, and in particular, farm businesses, are likely to have an interest in the matter, but the council decision on whether or not to submit on the two discussion documents will not materially affect them. Communities and interested parties also can lodge submissions on the discussion documents representing their own views.
3. Māori impact statement
This report relates to a council administrative matter and therefore does not have a direct impact on Māori.
4. Financial implications
There are no financial implications associated with the decision on whether or not to lodge a submission on the discussion documents.
5. Implementation issues
There are no implementation issues associated with this decision.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
There are no policies or legislative compliance issues and there are no significant risks associated with the decision being made.
Background/Tuhinga
On 14 July 2021, the Government released two discussion documents for consultation. One details options for how freshwater farm plan regulations will be developed under part 9A of the Resource Management Amendment Act 2020. The other discussion document details proposed changes to the low slope map developed for the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020. Details on the proposed freshwater farm plan regulations and the proposed changes to the low slope land map for the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 are both available on the Ministry for the Environment’s website:
· https://consult.environment.govt.nz/freshwater/freshwater-farm-plan-regulations/
· https://consult.environment.govt.nz/freshwater/stock-exclusion-regulations/
The discussion documents seek feedback on the proposed freshwater farm plan regulations and proposed changes to the low slope land map incorporated into the Government’s stock exclusion regulations.
Key features of the proposed freshwater farm plan regulations are summarised below:
Outcomes
· Freshwater farm plans will be outcomes-focused, and will prescribe clear goals that must be met, not a set of rules to follow. These outcomes, or goals, will relate to farm practices, ecosystem health, and the wider catchment. Plans will need to demonstrate how outcomes will be achieved through a risk assessment process and a set of associated actions chosen to address identified risks or impacts.
Certification
· Freshwater farm plans will need to be certified by an accredited professional to ensure plans meet requirements and are fit for purpose.
· Accreditation of certifiers will be overseen by a national accreditation body which will administer the processes for disputes, complaints, and removal of certifier accreditation.
Audit
· An auditor will assess whether a farm is complying with the relevant certified freshwater farm plan, but will not assess or review the quality or robustness of the freshwater farm plan itself.
· The findings of the auditor will be reported to the relevant farm business and the regional council.
· Auditors will be appointed from an existing accreditation body that oversees professional auditors.
Implementation
· Freshwater farm plans will not be required across the country all at once. A phased approach will be taken to allow capacity development in terms of certifiers, auditors, farm advisors, and regional councils.
· Freshwater farm plans will be phased in and prioritised on a catchment-by-catchment basis, with the catchment prioritisation completed by regional councils.
Monitoring and enforcement
· A quality assurance mechanism is proposed to ensure that certified freshwater farm plans are of an acceptable standard to achieve the intended freshwater outcomes. This national quality assurance mechanism will be overseen by a Ministry or a Crown entity, in partnership with tangata whenua.
· To enforce freshwater farm plans, auditors will report audit results to regional councils which will use the enforcement tools within the RMA to address non-compliance.
· A series of infringement offences ranging from $500 to $1500 are proposed.
Matters not being consulted on
· MfE is not seeking feedback on the legislated requirements set out in Part 9A of the RMA.
Key features of the proposed changes to the low slope land map are summarised below:
As part of the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020, MfE introduced a map that identifies low slope land across New Zealand. This map designates the requirement to exclude beef cattle and deer from wide rivers, lakes, and natural wetlands. However, feedback has since revealed significant issues with the methodology used to create the map, including that the map contains areas of land that were not intended to be captured by the regulations.
Changes to the low slope land map relevant to Northland are:
· A more advanced mapping methodology that better represents land slope values.
· A change in the slope threshold which triggers the identification of low slope land from 0 to 10 degrees to 0 to 5 degrees.
· Managing stock exclusion from waterways on terrain not identified as low slope land through freshwater farm plans.
The proposed changes reduce the total land area subject to the slope layers from 51% covered by the current low slope map to 25% of Northland land area covered by the proposed map.
Key submission points
The two discussion documents are available for submissions to the Ministry of the Environment until 12 September 2021. At the time of writing, staff are yet to develop a draft submission. However, staff have provided an overview of key submission points in Attachment 1 of this report. In the event council determines a submission should be lodged, due to the submission close off date being before the next council meeting, it is recommended that authority to approve and lodge the submission be delegated to the Chief Executive Officer.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Freshwater farm plan regulations and stock exclusion low slope map: key submission points ⇩
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Emergency Services Fund Allocations 2021-2024 |
From: |
Tony Phipps, Group Manager - Customer Services - Community Resilience |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Tony Phipps, Group Manager - Customer Services - Community Resilience, on 05 August 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The Northland Regional Council, through its Long Term Plan process, has decided to continue with the Emergency Services Fund (ESF) for the next three financial years. Ratepayers contribute about $12 each a year, creating a fund (the ESF) to support organisations whose primary purpose is to save lives that are in immediate or critical danger, in the Northland region.
For each of the following three financial years the emergency services rate raises an estimated actual collection of $982,000. Of this, $10,000 will go towards emergency services related promotion and community engagement, leaving $972,000 per year available to allocate.
As part of the Long Term Plan process, the council held a
workshop on 8 June 2021 to hear presentations from emergency service providers
and discuss how the ESF should be allocated for the next three financial
years. Based on the presentations and discussion at the workshop, the
following allocations are recommended for confirmation:
· Northland Emergency Services Trust - $535,000 annually to support the provision of helicopter rescue and ambulance services and necessary helicopter upgrades.
· Far North & Northland Land Search and Rescue - $30,000 jointly annually towards purchasing life-saving equipment and training for volunteers.
· Far North Radio and Sea Rescue - $9,000 annually to support the radio service, in particular its continued search and rescue and emergency response.
· Coastguard Northern Region - $84,000 annually to support their ongoing life-saving maritime rescue services in Northland.
· St John Northern Region - $90,000 annually to support and train volunteers to participate in their life-saving services.
· Surf Life Saving Northern Region - $224,000 annually to provide professional lifeguard services in six key Northland locations during the peak holiday period.
1. That the report ‘Emergency Services Fund Allocations 2021-2024’ by Tony Phipps, Group Manager - Customer Services - Community Resilience and dated 3 August 2021, be received.
2. That the council approves the distribution of the Emergency Services Fund for the next three financial years 2021-2024 as follows:
o Northland Emergency Services Trust - $535,000 annually
o Far North & Northland Land Search and Rescue - $30,000 jointly annually
o Far North Radio and Sea Rescue - $9,000 annually
o Coastguard Northern Region - $84,000 annually
o St John Northern Region - $90,000 annually
o Surf Life Saving Northern Region - $224,000 annually.
Options
ESF allocations
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Approve the recommended distribution of the Emergency Services Fund for the next three financial years 2021-2024. |
Ensures that NRC is abiding by its commitments laid out in the Long Term Plan. Ensures that the allocations discussed at the 8 June 2021 council workshop are made final. Ensures that the emergency service providers who presented at the 8 June 2021 council workshop are able to begin receiving their allocated funding, to support their life-saving activities in the Northland region. |
There are no perceived disadvantages to this option.
|
2 |
Decline the recommended distribution of the Emergency Services Fund. |
There are no perceived advantages to this option. |
As it has been decided to continue the Emergency Services Fund through the Long Term Plan process, council is required to agree on a distribution of this fund. It would be necessary to hold another council workshop to listen to the emergency service provider’s presentations again, and hold another discussion about allocations – or, undertake some other allocation process. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan and/or is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
2. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with council’s 2021–31 Long Term Plan which was approved in accordance with council’s decision-making requirements of sections 76–82 of the Local Government Act 2002.
No additional risks are perceived.
3. Community views
The community’s view on the emergency services rate was sought through the Long Term Plan process. There has been good community support for the ESF and the emergency service providers chosen to receive allocations.
4. Māori impact statement
As part of the Northland community, māori will continue to benefit from the support we provide emergency service providers in Northland.
5. Financial implications
Following the Long Term Plan process, the allocations recommended are within the budget for the fund.
There are no other financial
implications perceived.
6. Implementation issues
No additional implementation issues are perceived.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Nil
Supporting documents can be found on Big Tin Can under 2021 06 08 Council Workshop.
Council Meeting item: 7.4
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Adoption of the Investment Policy and Liability Management Policy |
From: |
Casey Mitchell, Management Accountant |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 05 August 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
This report seeks council approval and adoption of the Investment Policy and Liability Management Policy.
1. That the report ‘Adoption of the Investment Policy and Liability Management Policy’ by Casey Mitchell, Management Accountant and dated 3 August 2021, be received.
2. That in accordance with the requirements of section 102, and pursuant to sections 104 and 105 of the Local Government Act 2002, the council adopts the following policies:
a) Liability Management Policy; and
b) Investment Policy.
Options
The adoption of the Liability Management Policy and Investment Policy is a specific requirement of section 102 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA).
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Adopt the policies presented here for adoption |
Council will achieve compliance with the LGA, and have the required policies in place. |
None |
2 |
Do not adopt the policies presented here for adoption |
None |
Council will not have the required policies in place and will not achieve compliance with the LGA and will be in a position of greater risk. |
The staff’s recommended option is 1.
Considerations
1. Financial implications
There are no direct financial implications, but these policies will provide future direction on how certain financial decisions may be made.
2. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities. Council was not legally required to consult on these policies, in accordance with section 102(5) of the Local Government Act 2002.3. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The decision is consistent with policy and legislative requirements.
Being a purely operational matter, Community Views and the Māori Impact Statement are not applicable.
Background/Tuhinga
The Investment Policy and Liability Management Policy are required by section 102 and outlined in sections 104 and 105 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA). These policies sit within the financial management framework under the Treasury Management Policy.
The Investment Policy and Liability Management Policy were last adopted as part of the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan process. There have been minor adjustments made since these policies were last adopted. These changes include:
· Expansion of the responsibility structure in both policies. This has added more specific categories, for example expanding ‘Management and Staff’ to CEO, General Manager, Finance Manager.
· The ratio for net debt against revenue if council receives an external credit rating, within the Liability Management Policy, has been reviewed and increased from 250% to 280%.
· The net interest on external debt to not exceed annual revenue percentage has also increased from 10% to 20%.
The adjustment listed above relating to the debt and interest ratios have been made based on a review received from the council’s treasury management advisors PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Draft Liability Management Policy 2021 ⇩
Attachment 2: Draft Investment Policy 2021 ⇩
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Health and Safety Report |
From: |
Kelcie Mills, Health and Safety Advisor |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Group Manager - Corporate Excellence, on 03 August 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
This report is to inform the council of the activity in health and safety for the month of July 2021. An overview/summary of the activities include:
· The 2021–2022 Health and Safety Strategy has been approved. There are 40 outcomes identified. The H&S committee has had a workshop to identify the top five priorities to start with.
· Workplace inspections were completed by the health and safety representatives at NRC offices.
· There was an increase in hazard related events, and a decrease in injury/incident related events reported.
· Training completed includes mental health 101 and height safety awareness.
That the report ‘Health and Safety Report’ by Kelcie Mills, Health and Safety Advisor and dated 3 August 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
1. Health and safety performance
Table 1: Health and safety performance lead and lag indicators
*Based on calendar year
Table 1 outlines the key lead and lag indicators in health and safety. May and June’s data are not included in the financial year (FY) total as they are in last financial year’s total.
· The annual review of systems did not begin in July as the new year’s targets were being finalised as part of the strategy. This will begin taking place in August.
· The completed inductions have continued to increase, from 81% in June, to 88% in July.
2. Risk management
The top risks are:
1. Dealing with aggressive people – psychological harm
2. Extended workload/stress
3. Workplace bullying and harassment
4. Working with contractors
5. Driving motor vehicles – accident and injury related
6. Slips, trips and falls
7. Sedentary work – ergonomic harm
8. Working under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol
Note: Operating pumps and the sampling site have been removed from the top 10 as they have been managed. Dealing with aggressive people has moved into the top risk.
Risk Updates
· The top three risks all involve psychological and psychosocial risk factors. These factors are the most difficult to manage and prevent as everyone’s attitudes, behaviours, beliefs, and values can vary the extent of actual and perceived harm as well as the support required.
o Staff are encouraged to report stress related events which can cover all three of these risks. Each are handled individually.
o We are working to identify a tool or strategy for an organisational approach to support what is already in place, including the psychological safety training, resilience training, one on one management, and free counselling services.
o Bullying and harassment reports are not high and the likelihood of it occurring is low. The reason that it ends up with a high resulting score and high up the top risks list is that even after putting in place ways to mitigate it there is the potential for a high psychological impact should occur.
· The Health and Safety (H&S) Advisor is working with other councils on H&S contractor management to see what the benchmark is and identify any gaps to continue improving in this area.
· For scoping the drug and alcohol risk the H&S team will work with the other Northland councils to see what is being done, work with our health monitoring provider to see what their advice is, and work with the H&S representatives to identify what the risk is and be clearer on if we need to further review it.
· The draft traffic management plan has been received from the consultant and is currently being reviewed by key staff to ensure it reflects our scenarios. Once finalised, new training and induction will be offered to staff to ensure we are following best practice.
3. Injuries, incidents and hazards
Figure 1: Number of hazard and injury related events for previous 12 months
Figure 2 shows an increase in hazard related events, and a decrease in injury/incident related events in July. The event rate by headcount has remained stable.
Events reported
Figure 2: Top event types for previous 12 months
Events of interest
Note: the events of interest only detail high risk events, or events which affect large groups of people.
· In July 10 people were identified as going 20km/h or more over the speed limit. To manage these reports, managers are engaged by sharing the overspeed report and having them address their team member. Poor driving related data will begin being included in following reports to show the ongoing events.
· A worker fell off a ladder and sprained their ankle. They weren’t following the standard operating procedure which outlines that a 2nd person is required to hold the ladder while a worker is climbing it. All other safety precautions had been taken. The worker recognised that completing a Take 5 before starting would have prevented this accident. The team has used this accident as a learning tool/reminder to follow procedure.
· A controlled substance was delivered into reception when no controlled substance licence (CSL) holder was available to receive the goods. It is a legal requirement that a CSL holder receives the package. During the investigation, it was identified that the supplier and courier were not meant to deliver the package, and that it was meant to be picked up at the depot. However, this failure meant that it was delivered. The customer services team signed for it when they shouldn’t have due to lack of training, and no CSLs were sighted. To prevent this happening again, information was given to the customer services team about what they cannot sign for, the supplier was told that the courier delivered it when they shouldn’t have, and the customer services information system (Freshdesk) will be updated with information on all CSL holders.
· There was one stress related event reported as a result of the restructure. This report is being dealt with by the manager, and the health and safety advisor is offering support.
· Four noise related events were reported because of the renovations happening at the Water Street office. The contractor had been told that the noisy periods are to take place before 8am. However, to prevent it reoccurring, the lead person in the construction staff has been told they can go straight to the key managers involved to forewarn them. The managers and their teams can further work elsewhere or remotely during periods of noise. Hearing protection is also available to them as a last resort.
4. Health and safety strategy work programme
Leadership
· The reviewed Health and Safety Strategy was approved at the July Health and Safety Committee meeting.
Communication and engagement
· The health and safety representatives have been completing floor and office inspections throughout July.
· The health and safety spotlight for July focuses on the new health and safety strategy.
Wellbeing
· The Wellbeing Committee’s winter warmer fitness challenge took place in July with 40 participants and lots of engagement.
Learning and development
· Training completed this month includes mental health 101, and height safety awareness.
· A training calendar has been developed for the 2021 – 2022 financial year.
Continual improvement
· See attachment 1 to see the Health and Safety Strategy.
· The Committee had a workshop to identify which outcomes are high priority and developed action plans to begin working on these.
· This first change of note is that our vision has changed from Work Safe, home safe – a progressive H&S culture that we all own, to Ngā tāngata o te pokapū me ā mātou mahi. Putting people at the centre of everything we do. The purpose of this change is to reflect how we want to continue to drive and improve our culture with a focus on the overall health and wellbeing of our people.
· The second key change was the development of a new pillar titled hazards and risk. Where the old injury and illness pillar had a focus on both preventing and managing injury and illness, this new pillar is focused on effective risk management and reducing harm to prevent injury and ensure good health. The injury and illness pillar has been revised to solely focus on effectively managing injury/illness and learning from outcomes.
5. Legislation updates
Nil.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Health and Safety Stragety 2021 2022 ⇩
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Chair's Report to Council |
From: |
Penny Smart, Chair |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Penny Smart, Chair, on 11 August 2021 |
Purpose of Report
This report is to receive information from the Chair on meetings/events attended, and correspondence sent for the month of July 2021.
That the report ‘Chair's Report to Council’ by Penny Smart, Chair and dated 2 August 2021, be received.
Meetings/events attended
During this period, I attended the following meetings/events/functions:
· Meetings attended with the council’s CEO, Malcolm Nicolson:
o LGNZ Zone 1 local government reform workshop, along with other councillors.
o Discussion with Simon Upton, Parliamentary Commission for the Environment –landscape approach to environmental policy, along with Cr Amy Macdonald.
o Meeting with Murray Jagger, Marsden Maritime Holdings.
o LGNZ fortnightly 3 waters zoom catchup.
o Virtual catch up with Tame Te Rangi – Kaipara Moana Remediation.
o Regional Sector Tour and LGNZ Conference. Councillor Rick Stolwerk also attended.
o LGNZ Zone 1 meeting at Far North District Council, along with other councillors.
o Northland Forward Together Strategic Planning Workshop at Far North District Council, along with other councillors.
o IKHMG and Kaipara Uri hand over, Te Hana, along with Cr Amy McDonald, as members of the KMR Committee.
· Regular Mayors and Chair catch up meetings.
· Enviroschools Green-Gold celebration – Ruawai Kindergarten.
· Meeting with Te Kahu o Taonui, Kaikohe.
· Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee Workshop, Te Hana.
· Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee Formal Hui, Te Hana, with Cr Amy Macdonald.
· Meeting with Greg Gent, Sir Lockwood Smith, Bruce Compton and Dr Jason Smith – Climate change impacts on Ruawai.
· Mangawahi Harbour Restoration Society AGM with Cr Rick Stolwerk.
Correspondence
During July I sent out the following correspondence:
Date |
Addressed To |
Subject |
09.07.21 |
Margaret Hicks |
Submission on the Long Term Plan 2021–2031 |
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 8.3
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Chief Executive’s Report to Council |
From: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer, on 12 August 2021 |
That the report ‘Chief Executive’s Report to Council’ by Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer and dated 31 July 2021, be received.
8.3.1 Highlights
New Bronze and Green-Gold Enviroschools
In July, three Enviroschools celebrated new stages in their sustainability journeys. Ruawai Kindergarten revelled in becoming a Green-Gold Enviroschool, whilst Arohanui Early Learning Childhood Centre (Kerikeri), Educare Totara Park (Whangārei) and Hillcrest Kindergarten (Kaikohe) celebrated Enviroschools Bronze. Chair Penny Smart, Cr Marty Robinson and Cr Justin Blaikie officiated at the occasions.
|
|
|
Green-Gold for Ruawai Kindergarten |
Bronze for Arohanui Early Learning Childhood Centre |
Bronze for Hillcrest Kindergarten |
End-of-year Financials
We have achieved a pleasing financial result for the year, driven largely by better than expected economic conditions. Council took a prudent approach when preparing its 2020/21 budgets given the outlook at the time and made a number of provisions to withstand the anticipated severe financial impact of COVID-19. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were not as severe as anticipated and it is pleasing that council’s capital base and reserves were not only preserved but, in many cases, enhanced over the past year.
8.3.2 CEO’s Office
Department |
Description |
Status |
Consent decision appeal |
Two separate consent applications for replacement and new consents relating to a proposed expansion of, Doug’s Ōpua Boat Yard in Walls Bay, Ōpua |
No further update. |
Economics - REL |
Draft proposal received from Maher Jammal and response provided. |
Received and reviewed proposal. |
8.3.3 Corporate Excellence
Fraud Declaration
I am not aware of any fraud nor am I investigating any incidence or suspected incidence of fraud at this time.
8.3.4 Regulatory Services
During July 2021, a total of 100 decisions were issued. These decisions comprised:
Moorings |
6 |
|
Land Use Consents |
40 |
Coastal Permits |
18 |
|
Water Permits |
16 |
Land Discharge Permits |
8 |
|
Bore Consents |
9 |
Water Discharge Permits |
3 |
|
|
|
The processing timeframes for the July 2021 consents ranged from:
1,183 to 4 calendar days, with the median time being 32 days;
775 to 3 working days, with the median time being 20 days.
Forty-three applications were received in July 2021.
Of the 96 applications in progress at the end of July 2021:
Forty-eight were received more than 12 months ago, with the following reasons:
Group of groundwater take consents (Aupōuri) in process of being determined |
24 |
Awaiting additional information (including CIAs) |
10 |
Consultation with affected parties/stakeholders |
4 |
On-hold pending new rules becoming operative |
5 |
Other |
5 |
Eight were received between 6 and 12 months ago (most awaiting further information from the applicant);
Forty less than 6 months.
Appointment of Hearing Commissioners
No commissioners were appointed in July 2021.
Consents Decisions and Progress on Notified Applications in Process, Objections and Appeals
The current level of notified application processing activities at the end of July 2021 is (by number):
Applications Publicly/Limited Notified During Previous Month |
1 |
Progress on Applications Previously Notified |
2 |
Hearings and Decisions |
1 |
Appeals/Objections |
1 |
COMPLIANCE MONITORING
The results of compliance monitoring for the period 1 - 31 July 2021 (and year-to-date figures) are summarised in the following table and discussed below.
Classification |
Total |
Full compliance |
Low risk non-compliance |
Moderate non-compliance |
Significant non-compliance |
Not exercised during period |
Air Discharge |
19 |
17 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Bore Consent |
10 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Coastal Discharge |
36 |
29 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
Coastal Permit |
7 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
FDE – Discharge Permit |
27 |
22 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
FDE – Permitted Activity |
10 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Land Discharge |
47 |
32 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
Land Use Consent |
32 |
17 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
Water Discharge |
52 |
33 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
Water Permit |
31 |
18 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
Water Take |
220 |
160 |
46 |
7 |
1 |
6 |
Total |
491 |
345 |
94 |
26 |
6 |
20 |
Percentage |
|
70.3% |
19.1% |
5.3% |
1.2% |
4.1% |
Year to date |
491 |
345 |
94 |
26 |
6 |
20 |
Percentage |
|
70.3% |
19.1% |
5.3% |
1.2% |
4.1% |
Three of the SNCs related to the Opononi and Omapere WWTP (exceedances of water quality limits in June and July), one was for the Kaitaia WWTP (water quality exceedances), and two were for Kaitaia public water supply (two take points have a shared meter – both have been given SNC, as both require a separate meter).
Coastal
The majority of consents monitored during the reporting period related to coastal discharges (treated municipal sewage, boat ramp maintenance and other industrial).
Farm Dairy Effluent (FDE) Monitoring
FDE inspections commenced on 21 July 2021. NRC staff and the FDE contractor will be visiting a total of 783 farms this monitoring season (five less than last year). To date approximately 4% of farms have been visited and reported on. Comparisons of this season’s results so far with those for last season are given in the tables below. It is too early to draw comparisons between years.
Consented Farms (592 to do)
Full Compliance |
Moderate Non-Compliance |
Significant Non-Compliance |
|||
This Year |
Last Year |
This Year |
Last Year |
This Year |
Last Year |
20 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
80% |
36% |
20% |
50% |
0% |
14% |
Non-consented farms (191 to do)
Full Compliance |
Moderate Non-Compliance |
Significant Non-Compliance |
|||
This Year |
Last Year |
This Year |
Last Year |
This Year |
Last Year |
9 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
90% |
69% |
10% |
15.5% |
0% |
15.5% |
Farm numbers over the past five years
|
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
Number |
919 |
898 |
855 |
816 |
789 |
Difference |
|
-21 |
-43 |
-39 |
-27 |
Water, Waste, Air and Land Use (WWALU) Compliance Monitoring
Following the 2019/2020 drought and concern about the appropriateness of issuing water shortage directions to manage take limits for public water supplies, the NRC developed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on how this is expected to be managed in future in collaboration with the FNDC, WDC and KDC. The aim of the MOU is to ensure each district council public water supply is managed during periods of low rainfall to achieve consent compliance without shutting it down or, if this is not achieved, to minimise the adverse environmental effects, and period and extent of consent non-compliance. The MOU was signed by the CEOs of all four councils on 9 August 2021.
Contaminated Land Management
Five incidents involving the discharge of hazardous substances and 22 enquiries regarding contaminated land were received and responded to. Four hundred and five kilograms of hazardous waste was disposed of at the household hazardous waste amnesty day, and 63 sites were added to the Selected Land-use Register.
Environmental Incidents
There were no environmental incidents reported in July which resulted in a significant environment-al impact.
ENFORCEMENT
Abatement Notices, Infringement Notices and Formal Warnings
The following enforcement actions were taken during the period:
Enforcement ID |
Number of Recipients |
Action |
Served Date |
Nature Of Offence(s) |
Originated From |
ENF.065895.01 |
1 |
AN |
06-07-21 |
Burning and smoke nuisance |
Incident |
ENF.065896.01 |
1 |
AN |
06-07-21 |
Illegal activity in coastal marine area |
Incident |
IN |
06-07-21 |
Illegal activity in coastal marine area |
Incident |
||
IN |
06-07-21 |
Illegal activity in coastal marine area |
Incident |
||
ENF.065900.01 |
1 |
IN |
06-07-21 |
Other water discharge |
Incident |
ENF.065910.01 |
1 |
AN |
06-07-21 |
Burning and smoke nuisance |
Incident |
ENF.065922.01 |
2 |
AN |
01-07-21 |
Earthworks/land use |
Incident |
AN |
01-07-21 |
Earthworks/land use |
Incident |
||
ENF.065923.01 |
1 |
AN |
01-07-21 |
Sewage (municipal) |
Incident |
ENF.065925.01 |
1 |
AN |
15-07-21 |
Sewage (communal) |
Routine Monitoring |
ENF.065927.01 |
1 |
AN |
15-07-21 |
Earthworks/land use |
Routine Monitoring |
AN |
15-07-21 |
Earthworks/land use |
Routine Monitoring |
||
ENF.065929.01 |
1 |
AN |
15-07-21 |
Discharge to land |
Routine Monitoring |
ENF.065931.01 |
1 |
AN |
21-07-21 |
Earthworks/land use |
Incident |
ENF.065932.01 |
1 |
AN |
20-07-21 |
Illegal take, dam or diversion of water |
Routine Monitoring |
ENF.065933.01 |
1 |
AN |
21-07-21 |
Discharge to land |
Incident |
IN |
21-07-21 |
Discharge to land |
Incident |
||
ENF.065934.01 |
1 |
AN |
15-07-21 |
Earthworks/land use |
Incident |
ENF.065935.01 |
1 |
AN |
22-07-21 |
Sediment |
Routine Monitoring |
ENF.065938.01 |
1 |
AN |
22-07-21 |
Sediment |
Routine Monitoring |
ENF.065942.01 |
1 |
IN |
29-07-21 |
Sewage (municipal) |
Incident |
IN |
29-07-21 |
Sewage (municipal) |
Incident |
Action Type |
Number |
Abatement Notice (AN) |
16 |
Infringement Notice (IN) |
6 |
Other Enforcement
Earthworks without erosion and sediment controls – Tōtara North
Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 20 July 2020 against an individual for earthworks undertaken without controls, and work within a watercourse and the riparian management zone. The defendant has pleaded not guilty. A hearing was scheduled for 22-24 June 2021 which did not proceed due to the defendant being ill. We are now awaiting a new allocation for a hearing date as the Judge had no time the week commencing 2 August 2021.
Open burning on industrial/trade property – Whangārei
Charges were laid in the Whangārei District Court on 27 November 2020 against an individual for open burning on industrial/trade premises; the burnt items also included prohibited items. There are two charges against the individual who pleaded not guilty on 30 April 2021. A case review hearing was completed on 22 June 2021 and the case was set down for hearing on the 6-7 September 2021.
Farm dairy effluent – Tāheke
Charges were laid in the Kaikohe District Court on 30 March 2021 against a farm owner and his company for offences which occurred in August 2020. There are two charges against the company and one against the farm owner. The farm has a poor history of compliance with regional rules for animal effluent disposal. Disclosure was provided to the defence lawyers on 23 April 2021. A not guilty plea was entered on 23 June 2021. A case review hearing has been scheduled for 2 August 2021.
Farm dairy effluent – Parapara
Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 6 May 2021 against a farm owner for offences which occurred in August 2020. There are four charges against the farm owner. The first court appearance was set down for 9 July 2021, which was adjourned until 25 August 2021 to allow the defence lawyer to consider the disclosure documentation.
NATURAL RESOURCES MONITORING
Coastal/Water Quality Operations
All routine water quality and ecological programmes were undertaken in July, including:
Monthly sampling runs (coastal and freshwater water quality, periphyton, cyanobacteria)
Monthly validations of all continuous monitoring stations.
Quarterly water quality buoy deployments at the Town Basin and Waitangi.
Work commenced on building two new water quality buoys, that were developed in-house, allowing a more fit for purpose system at a fraction of the cost.
Natural Resources Data
LAWA Water Annual Refresh: Details of the request were provided to councils in May 2021. Several data checks and analysis need to be completed by September 2021, ready to go-live for World Rivers Day. The updates to the Air Quality and Land Cover topics are now available on the LAWA production/public site (www.lawa.org.nz).
The Data Team is also processing several national data requests as part of the Environmental Reporting project for freshwater data (i.e., the next iteration in the synthesis report series, Environment Aotearoa 2022).
The go-live for the new environmental data portal is now delayed to August 2021. Testing with external customers is now underway.
The electronic data collection form is now developed to collect hydrology data and will be operational in 6-8 weeks once the testing phase is completed.
HYDROLOGY
Hydrology Projects
NRC attended the National Flood Management and Flood Forecasting workshop hosted by Bay of Plenty Regional Council. Prior to the workshop NRC contributed to a national maturity assessment on all council’s flood procedures, this work was completed by Tonkin Taylor and presented at the workshop. The report highlights that NRC needs to improve its flood forecasting capability, as currently NRC is one of two regional councils that do not operate a predicative model.
Data quality assessment of five river stations was completed for the drought report.
A datum level survey report was received from Cato Bolam Consultants Limited for 50 bore sites and 16 lakes.
Rainfall Near normal rainfall was recorded for most of the region. The Kāeo and the Bay of Islands catchments were wetter than normal, and the west coast from Kai Iwi Lakes south was drier than normal with around 70% of typical rainfall. The long-range climate outlook for the next three months suggests an equal likelihood of normal or below normal rainfall (NIWA).
|
|
River Flows Overall for July 2021, recorded flows in most rivers along the east coast were “above normal” (above 60th percentile), rivers west of Whangārei were predominantly “normal” (40th-60th percentile) or “below normal” (25th-40th percentile) and rivers in Bream Bay and to the west were “normal” or “below normal” (25th-40th percentile). |
Groundwater Groundwater levels were “normal” or “above normal” in the far north and along the east coast, “low” in Poroti and “Very Low” in Mangawhai and Ruawai. This reflects rainfall deficit occurring in those low groundwater areas with weather systems delivering higher rainfall to the north-east of the region and lower to the south, particularly the south-west. |
Area |
Status |
Percentile |
Aupōuri |
Above Normal |
> 60th |
|
Taipā |
Above Normal |
> 60th |
|
Russell |
Above Normal |
> 60th |
|
Kaikohe |
Normal |
40 - 60th |
|
Whangārei |
Below Normal |
25 - 40th |
|
Marsden-Ruakākā |
Below Normal |
25 - 40th |
|
Porotī |
Low |
10 - 25th |
|
Mangawhai |
Very Low |
5 - 10th |
|
Ruawai |
Very Low |
5 - 10th |
NATURAL RESOURCES (NR) SCIENCE
Air quality and carbon emission
Ambient PM10 monitoring results for June 2021 for the Robert Street, Mairtown (Whangārei airshed) and Ruakākā (Marsden Point airshed) stations showed compliance with the National Environmental Standards (NES) for Air Quality.
Ambient PM2.5 monitoring results for the Robert Street, Whangārei station for June 2021 were within the Ambient Air Quality Guideline value.
Pattle Delamore Partners (PDP) submitted the draft report of PM10 and PM2.5 inventories for the Whangārei and Kaitāia airsheds. The final report is due in early August 2021.
An updated version of LAWA Air Quality went live from 1 July 2021 (www.lawa.org.nz). Staff were engaged to check the validity of data and descriptions of monitoring sites.
Council’s CO2-e (carbon dioxide equivalent) monthly emissions in 2020 and 2021 are presented in the graph below. Since April 2021, council’s CO2-e emission has increased every month, compared with that for the same month in 2020. This is largely attributed to the COVID-19 restrictions/lockdown in 2020. The graph is based on live data and therefore figures for the last few months are subject to change.
Freshwater Ecology
Work has started on threatened fish species monitoring in the Whangārei Harbour, Bream Bay and Whananaki FMUs.
The NR Science team begun the annual ecological monitoring programmes (including more in-depth periphyton monitoring and macroinvertebrates) and collaboratively designed a fish passage monitoring project with the Compliance Monitoring team.
Freshwater Quality
The Environmental Monitoring Networks Review Stage 2 is nearly complete. Monitoring plans and associated documentation have been produced and will be released to the operational teams for feedback.
River ecosystem metabolism based on continuous dissolved oxygen (DO): The purpose of this Envirolink funded project was to get advice and guidance from the nationally renowned freshwater expert Dr Roger Young from Cawthron Institute on data collection, data management, data analysis and reporting of the NPS-FM attributes related to continuous DO measurements. The draft report and guidance document, together with a data analysis automation tool (using R codes) have been delivered. It is currently being internally reviewed by key NRC staff.
Groundwater
Aqua Intel Aotearoa - Water Projects in Northland: A collaboration between the Provincial Growth Fund (Kānoa) and GNS Science, focusing on regional water availability and storage. Aqua Intel Aotearoa has recently approved funding for the following four projects in Northland that align with NRC current priorities:
1. Te Hiku Water Project - The Te Hiku Water Project is a scientific investigation to improve understanding of the Aupōuri Aquifer. The $3.3M project is largely funded through Aqua Intel Aotearoa with co-funding from NRC, FNDC, Ngai Takoto and Te Aupōuri. The aim of the project is to improve our understanding of the:
aquifer geometry (depth, extent and geology);
connection to surface water bodies (wetland, lakes and streams);
meeting point between groundwater and sea water; and
groundwater recharge and flows.
The information gained will guide:
environmental protection;
sustainable economic growth and development; and
future decisions on resource consents and water management.
The project has come from the Te Hiku community with the project team consisting of representatives from the Te Hiku Iwi, local landowners, DoC, FNDC and NRC. The project commenced with the collation and review of existing information on the Aquifer. Ground based surveying is being carried out in late July/early August 2021. Additional surveying, data collection and interpretation will occur in 2022 with the results being made available to interested parties in 2023. The project team held public huis in Kaitaia and Pukenui in July 2021, with further meetings planned throughout the project. Additional information including an outline of the hui presentations can be found at https://www.aquaintel.co.nz/te-hiku-water-study.
2. Northland Flow Harvesting Assessment: The aim of the project is to understand the opportunities and impacts of high flow harvesting in Northland and assess the impacts of various flow harvesting regimes on the instream environment. High flow harvesting is a favoured option for many new horticultural developments in water-short areas. The project is funded through Aqua Intel Aotearoa in the order of $100,000.
3. Northland Surface Water Flows Project: The aim of the project is to:
increase the confidence of investors in the availability of water;
sustainable economic growth and development; and
provide improved spatial coverage of surface water flow monitoring across the region.
The specific sites will be selected based on ability to obtain accurate flow information, potential future demand, Māori land development and current flow information gaps in areas such as Te Hiku and Poutō. The project team consists of representatives from Te Tai Tokerau Water Trust, NRC and Aqua Intel Aotearoa. The latter is providing funding for this project in the order of $150,000.
4. Poutō Groundwater Investigation: The aim of this project is to improve understanding of the Poutō groundwater resource. The outputs will inform future decision on water availability and understanding of security of supply for future resource users and inform sustainable economic growth in the area. The project team is yet to be confirmed but is likely to include representatives of Te Uri o Hau, NRC, Aqua Intel Aotearoa and GNS. Aqua Intel Aotearoa is providing funding in the order of $250,000, with additional co-funding from GNS, the amount of which is yet to be finalised.
8.3.5 Environmental Services
LAND MANAGEMENT
Sustainable Hill Country and Regional Priorities
Milestones |
Status |
Farm Environment Plans (FEPs) |
Erosion Control Plans (ECP) will replace FEPs for this deliverable. These plans will identify erosion and include a 3-year work programme to treat that erosion. In addition, the plans will include land use capability (LUC) mapping and soil fact sheets. |
Stakeholder engagement |
New engagement strategy in development to target farms with highly erodible land that are greater than 250 hectares. Environmental grants will be prioritised on these farms. |
Land treatments – Retirement fencing |
Land Management Advisors are preparing new applications for this year's funding totalling $304,500. |
Poplar and Willow Nursery
Objective |
Status |
Harvest |
Harvest is complete and direct sales to the public have taken place to distribute remaining poles including seconds and Shrub Willow. These poles are for non- soil con purposes such as stock shade and shelter. In previous years this material was given away or chipped/burned, but we are now selling it as a cost recovery exercise. |
Environment Fund Progress
Environment Fund |
$ |
86 completed grants |
522,815 |
Northland Regional Council contribution to Government funded projects |
482,000 |
Nursery |
30,000 |
Total |
1,034,815 |
The over allocation approved by Council in the sum of $134,800 at the start of the financial year allowed for the withdrawals and underspends totaling $131,141.
Whangārei Harbour Catchment Group
A meeting held on 14 June 2021 covered the following points:
Wetland restoration at the council’s Kotuku Street property above the Hopua te Nihotetea detention dam and the possibility of allocating the catchment group’s $10,000 discretionary fund to this project.
An update on the Whangarei Urban Awa project.
The future focus of the group, including the current vacant chairperson position.
Actions from the meeting included:
Lorna to canvas wider membership approval for the fund allocation towards Kotuku St wetland project
Whangarei District Council staff to present update at next meeting about the Limeburner’s Creek monitoring and Blue Green Strategy.
Waimā Waitai Waiora partnership
Million Metres (Sustainable Business Network) have raised $17,021.95 for the Waimā Waitai Waiora project so far, with team members Anahita Djamali and Chantez Connor-Kingi featuring in a Million Metres fundraising video.
A quarterly Governance hui was held at Tau Henare marae in Pipiwai recently, which I attended, and we discussed potential future opportunities for the Waimā Waitai Waiora partnership with the interim Kaipara Moana Remediation Manager.
The Te Kawa Waiora research component of the project held another Iwi and Hapū research training session facilitated through one of our partners, Reconnecting Northland.
Two project plans have had the planting component completed, with approximately 4,000 native plants in the ground so far.
BIODIVERSITY
FIF Dune Lakes Project
Objective |
Status |
Aquatic weed and pest fish control |
Resource consent has been granted to control Hornwort and Egeria in four lakes in Northland. Pre-herbicide monitoring of submerged plant beds was done at lakes Tutaki, Egg and Tohoraha / Mt Camel as required by EPA. A meeting was held with Te Uri O Hau Incorporation about their lakes on the Poutō Peninsula and an invitation has been made for NRC to visit Lake Karaka in the next month. |
Sediment and nutrient mitigation |
A planning day with mana whenua at Kai Iwi Lakes is being held in August to discuss sediment mitigation options. A meeting was held to plan sediment detainment bunds for some of the Freshwater Improvement Fund lakes. |
Education Days |
Dates have been set for dune lakes education days for this financial year. |
Wetlands
Fish traps were set in kahikatea swamp forest which is being fenced by EFund on the Manganui River. Black mudfish listed as Nationally Threatened (At Risk –Declininig) were caught. The Northern Advocate ran a feature article on wetlands including their value, rarity and protection.
The Ministry for the Environment contracted a private consultant to produce a wetland map layer for Northland in order to test methodology for national roll out. Maps produced by machine learning were checked by three biodiversity and land staff. 75 wetland and wetland clusters were tested against Councils maps, known information about the wetlands and aerial oblique photography. The conculsion was that the level of accuracy using machine learning was too low for the maps to be adapted for use in Northland. This is possibly due to the complexity and fragmented nature of wetlands in Northland.
CoastCare
CoastCare dune planting days were held at Te Wairoa, Matapouri with Ngunguru school and Matapouri Kaitiaki and at Pouto Point with Pouto School and Pouto Waikaretu Marae. CoastCare dune planting has also taken place this month at Te Ngaere, Paraparea Bay and Tern Point - Mangawhai.
CoastCare site visits to provide advice and plan work were held at Tapuaetahi with Tapuaetahi Incorporation, Ahipara and Tauroa Point with Te Runanga O Te Rarawa and Matapouri with Whangarei District Council. Other site visits were made to Waipu Cove and Te Ngaere.
|
|
CoastCare weeding and planting working bee at Te Wiaroa, Matapouri with Ngunguru School and Matapōuri Kaitiaki
BIOSECURITY
Rainbow Lorikeet Incursion
Between April 2020 and July 2021, council has received multiple reports of a small flock of rainbow lorikeets (between 5 and 10 birds) in the Piroa-Brynderwyn High Value Area, primarily on private properties in Kaiwaka and Mangawhai. An exclusion species in the Regional Pest Management Plan, there are no established populations in Northland. Contractors engaged by council were unable to locate the birds, so a request has been made to Biosecurity New Zealand to initiate a formal response to eradicate these birds.
WILD ANIMAL CONTROL
Russell Sika Eradication Project
Samples collected in the Russell Sika DNA proof of concept survey conducted in May 2021 are still being processed, but preliminary analysis has shown some interference from other species. Consequently, a goat cull over the Russell sika eradication operational area will be conducted so the sika DNA survey scheduled for January-February 2022 can be run without interference from goats. The cull is being used as an opportunity to work with hapū in the Russell area to identify local kaimahi inter-ested in joining a hunter training programme. This will help lead to long term sustainable control of goats in Northland.
KAURI PROTECTION
Kauri Protection Education Programme
The Kauri Protection Education Programme continues with a further three schools visited during the month. The programme has now been presented to 800+ children and 85 teachers across 22 Northland schools.
Kauri Dieback Track Mitigation Project
Work is continuing on three sections of the Te Araroa trail in the Kerikeri-Waipapa area. This includes basic track works such as clearing, slashing, shaping and aggregate laying.
Clean Card Workshops
The Kauri Protection Team presented a workshop at the Akerama Marae. Six local kaitiaki attended, all of whom benefitted from the wealth of kauri dieback knowledge shared with them on the day. Nine of these workshops have now been held for the year.
Hygiene Station Purchase
The kauri protection team have sold 24 of their innovative barrel and grate hygiene stations to the Department of Conservation in the Coromandel area. Two local Men’s Shed were engaged to construct the timber elements of the hygiene stations.
PARTNERSHIPS
Tutukākā High Value Area
Kiwi listening data collation is nearly complete, with some automated listening devices still being processed. Key listening sites have shown a return to the calling rates experienced three years ago, and the preliminary results from the automated listening devices also show significant increases in the call rate, some being over 15 calls per hour (with the overall average at ~13 calls per hour). A general observation is that birds appear to be calling later than the specified 6 to 8 pm window period
Mid North High Value Area
Support for existing groups is continuing, and with new additions, the total number of supported groups in the area has grown to 47. The collation of trap catch data showed that in 2020 calendar year, a total of 39,098 pests were removed from the Mid North. This included 12,175 possums, 13,237 rats, 450 stoats and 496 feral cats.
Pest Free Purerua (a programme receiving funding from Jobs for Nature – more information can be found at https://pfp.kiwi/ ) has a team of three trappers covering the majority of the properties from Kāpiro to Purerua. Trap intensity has been increased over the past quarter and trap checks fortnightly are removing possum, rats, and feral cats. Stoats are low in number and camera monitoring is confirming low pest numbers. The programme is on track and delivering to the Jobs for Nature key performance indicatiors with 1,810 traps installed as well as bait stations.
Piroa Brynderwyn High Value Area
The Piroa Brynderwyn High Value Area has completed analysis of their trap catch data with excellent results being obtained from the 23,000 ha landcare project. A total of 3,497 animal pests were removed from the high value area in 2020-2021.
Whangārei Heads High Value Area
· Kiwi monitoring: Analysis of the annual kiwi listening survey data is not complete, but early results are very encouraging. Call counts have jumped, and the population has now reached a significant milestone of a 1,055+ kiwi within the Whangārei Heads. An outstanding result when compared to the population of just 80 kiwi when work first started 20 years ago. |
Usually, a sign to celebrate the passing of the winter solstice, but in the case of Taiwan cherry, a reminder to seek and destroy. |
· Weed Action: The ‘Weed of the Month’ targeted in the community’s awareness program (via social media and roadside signs) was Taiwan cherry. The pink blossoms make the increasing spread of this plant more obvious at this time of year.
|
Western Northland High Value Area
Two new Community Pest Control Areas have been approved and are starting in the 2021/2022 financial year:
· Waipoua Forest Trust: The trust occupies 265 ha of previously cleared land bordering the northern and southern edges of the Waipoua Forest and is made up of three reserves known as Millennium Forest, Wairau Summit, and Pukemiro Ridge. The Waipoua Forest Trust is committed to restoring the natural balance of the forest ecosystem by replanting natives and controlling plant and animal pests. The Millennium Forest reserve is also important as it is part of the upper catchment of the Waipoua River which is the most pristine full catchment river system in Northland. Keeping this catchment free of weeds is of important ecological value to ensure this river ecosystem is protected from the invasion of water-borne weeds.
· Native Forest Restoration Trust: The trust has four prominent reserves in the Western Northland High Value Area that adjoin the Waipoua Forest Conservation Park on the northern, southern and eastern edges. The four reserves are Professor W.R. McGregor Reserve (343 ha), Elvie McGregor Reserve (141 ha), Cynthia Hewitt Reserve (152 ha) and Wekaweka Reserve (120 ha). All four reserves are at different stages of restoration, but the general focus is on reducing rats, possums and stoats to low levels and maintain the weed control programme.
Both the new community pest control areas have similar visions of protecting and restoring native forest and they will work together on pest control projects on their reserves with adjoining boundaries.
Predator Free Whangārei
The possum eradication team has been busy engaging with landowners and obtaining access agreements. The level of support for the project has been very positive, and to date 172 landowners have signed up, representing 4,822 ha (over half the eradication area). The team will be commencing installation of detection devices in the first week of August. Negotiations are being finalised with Bream Head Conservation Trust community group to deliver some of the device installation and ongoing camera detection work.
The team recently hosted DNA expert Andrew Veale from Manaaki Whenua. He presented information on the possible uses of possum DNA to the community as well as catching up with the team for an in-depth discussion. Consequently, the Predator Free team will be asking people in the Whangārei Heads area to gather possum ears to create a source population database.
MARINE BIOSECURITY
New Zealand Marine Sciences Society Conference, Tauranga 5 – 9 July
All staff from the marine biosecurity team attended the recent New Zealand Marine Sciences Society conference. This conference provided the opportunity to network with those involved in marine science from a range of institutions including regional and central government, universities, and community groups working throughout New Zealand. Highlights included the team presenting on the Clean Hull Plan, discussions on ‘green shipping’ (with Maritime New Zealand and the Ministry of Transport) and changes to the WorkSafe diving certification of competency and hearing about current research occurring in the marine space.
PEST PLANTS
Progressive containment plants – mile-a-minute
A survey of infestation sites outside of the containment zone found 8 out of 10 sites with active individuals. An extended survey of the only know Kaipara active sites found further infestation. All plants were treated.
|
|
This large infestation of Mile-a-minute at the only know Kaipara management site grew from a single stem (pictured right). |
Progressive containment plants – Manchurian wild rice
A boat survey of the Northern Wairoa, Manganui and Wairua rivers was conducted to check for new Manchurian wild rice infestations. Some locations of interest were identified that will require ground truthing.
Weed Workshops
The first round of this year’s weed workshops was completed on 1 July in Dargaville. Over the five workshops 86 people attended to learn about Northland’s worst weeds and how to remove them. A further workshop has been requested by NorthTec and is scheduled for August.
RIVERS
Long Term Plan Projects
Rivers |
Comments |
Awanui |
Earthworks has stopped for winter. Design and tendering for next year's works programme are underway. |
Otīria/Moerewa |
The preliminary design has been completed. Collaboration with Far North District Council and Northland Transport Alliance regarding bridge aliments will inform the detailed design. Landowner engagement is on-going. |
Matangirau |
Landowner engagement is progressing with expectations to start work next season. |
NATURAL HAZARDS
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
Region Wide Coastal Hazard Erosion Mapping |
100% complete |
The feedback period has now closed. Appropriate and applicable submissions are being reviewed and analysed. No major changes are expected. Update on the finalisation of the maps will be publicised and ‘notified’ to District Councils by the end of August 2021. |
Region Wide Coastal Hazard Flood Mapping |
100% complete |
The feedback period has now closed. Appropriate and applicable submissions are being reviewed and analysed. No major changes are expected. Update on the finalisation of the maps will be publicised and ‘notified’ to District Councils by the end of August 2021. |
Region Wide River Flood Mapping |
95% complete |
All model results and maps have been received; quality assurance and control process ongoing to be completed by the middle of August, last deliverables are also expected during that time. GIS Website publication scoping is ongoing with a view to publicise during the month of September. Advice is being sought regarding the consultation requirements on the maps. These maps are in addition to the existing Priority Rivers Flood Hazard maps. |
Whangārei (CBD) River Catchment Flood Model |
In progress |
Upgrade of model including new structures, updated LiDAR and sea level rise values and recalibration. Initial draft outcomes expected at the beginning of August 2021. |
Website Natural Hazards Portal |
In progress |
Morphum Environmental have been engaged to develop the portal; first inclusive workshop was held; initial draft lay-out was received and discussed. The second draft is expected during the first week of August; feedback and then followed up by a second workshop. |
Whangārei Inner Harbour Hydrodynamic Model |
90% complete |
Detailed, site specific. upgrade of the current coastal inundation model. Draft report received with the final deliverable expected first week of August. |
Raupo Drainage Scheme – Coastal Flood Hazard Analysis & Mitigation Options |
In progress |
We are scoping out the requirements with Kaipara District Council for consultancy service, to develop a detailed hydraulic model for the drainage area in relation to Coastal and River (catchment) Hazards. The objective being to establish a detailed base model and to develop flood hazard mitigation options, particularly from a coastal perspective, adaptation planning. |
CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
NRC Climate Change Strategy “Ngā Tāmata o te Moana’ and implementation plan |
Final design version complete |
Final strategy and implementation plan was adopted at council meeting 27 July and is now publicly available on council website. |
Te Taitokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy |
Draft complete – Territorial Authority review phase |
Draft strategy completed and distributed to territorial authority for General Manager review. Draft will be presented to the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee at a workshop on 9 August and to the 30 August Joint Committee meeting. |
MĀORI ENGAGEMENT
Long Term Plan Implementation - Mana Whakahono a Rohe (MWR)
Three meetings have progressed with Ngāti Rehia, Patuharakeke and key senior staff to begin implementation of the MWR. Discussions have included the following points:
Moorings and concerns raised by Ngāti Rehia about the number of moorings and specifically the process involved regarding a potential plan change to remove mooring areas.
Patuharakeke are considering applications for funding from Te Mana o Te Wai and how to work with council in allocation of resources or funding to support proposals and funding applications including IHEMP funding.
Opportunity for keeping hapū well informed of future planning work so that they can participate in the process fully.
Monitoring and the need for better communication by council on the State of the Environment monitoring network as hapū are not aware of the sites being monitored in their areas. The importance for hapū is how the data is shared and potential opportunities for working together in a more coordinated way.
Development of a reporting template for Mana Whakahono a Rohe to keep track of all the work that is already being done and how it aligns to Tiriti and Treaty obligations.
Training funds that are aligned more closely with kaitiakitanga rather than hearing commissioner Making Good Decisions training to be considered.
Te Uri o Hau to sign Mana Whakahono a Rohe in September at next TTMAC regional marae-based hui.
Te Hikutu hapū also keen to sign and follow the leadership within Mana Whakahono a Rohe hapū collective.
Te Whāriki Māori Responsiveness Policy in Action - Level 2
The first Level 2 workshop was held on Monday 26 July 2021 at Terenga Paraoa Marae, Porowini Avenue in Whangarei.
The main purpose of the workshop is council’s ongoing commitment to build the capability of staff to have authentic and meaningful engagement with tangata whenua. The higher-level outcomes are noted below:
Continue to build a deeper understanding of the Treaty of Waitangi and Te Tiriti o Waitangi, the differences between the two versions and their application for local government.
Recap the learnings of Level 1 and how staff have applied tikanga, te reo Māori and the Treaty of Waitangi in their daily practices
Better understanding of He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni, Declaration of Independence of the United Tribes of New Zealand 1835 and its application to the Te Taitokerau landscape
Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) holds regional hui at Moria Marae in Whirinaki
On Thursday 1 July, TTMAC held their regional hui at Moria Marae in Whirinaki. Presentations included Climate Change by Mike Smith, Chair of the National Iwi Climate Change Forum.
Mr Smith spoke about bringing a Te Ao Māori Kaupapa or lens to global warming. "This is an issue that affects everybody. We all rely on this little capsule of atmosphere to keep us alive," Mike says.
He says Māori have much leadership and matauranga to offer in this space. They have been protecting the taiao throughout history. Māori are keen to share that knowledge as partners, to bring us all together to fight towards common goals and objectives across the world.
|
|
Northland Regional Council's Matt De Boer, Climate Change Resilience Coordinator and Jan Van Der Vliet, Natural Hazards Advisor, spoke about Ngā taumata o te Moana – Our strategy for tackling climate change at the hui.
The name of the Climate Change Strategy – Ngā taumata o te Moana – was provided by Pita Tipene (Ngāti Hine), co-chair of Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party. The whakataukī 'Titiro atu ki ngā taumata ote moana', was first uttered by the Ariki of Ngati Hine, Te Ruki Kawiti immediately after the battle of Ruapekapeka in Jan 1846. It means 'Look to the horizons of the ocean' and encourages us to think strategically and maintain a global outlook while appreciating the ground upon which we stand.
Topics discussed were Significant Natural Areas, Resource Consents, and an update on the Three Waters Reform. A common theme at the hui is to ensure that we work together to make a real tangible difference in preserving our taonga and resources in Te Taitokerau.
8.3.6 STRATEGY, Governance And Engagement
REGIONAL PLANNING
Proposed Regional Plan
Since the last update to council, the court hearing has been held on fishing controls/MPA (Topic 14) appeals. The hearing took three weeks and most cultural evidence was presented on Mokau Marae. The court will release its decision in due course.
The court has issued its decision on water quality (Topic 5). The decision requires a number of water quality standards be applied in considering resource consents for discharges. It also directs council to work with the appeal parties to prepare draft changes in accordance with the court’s decision and to circulate these to parties within 20 working days (by 27 August). Parties to the appeals have a further 15 days to respond to council, and then council has to report back to the court with its preferred provisions and explanation of differences and reasoning within a further 20 working days.
District Planning
Two appeals on private plan change 78 (Estuary Estates) to the Kaipara District Plan have been lodged opposing elements of the decision (plan change 78 sought adjustments to existing residential and business zoning for 130ha of land in Mangawhai). Council has joined both appeals as an interested party under section 274 of the Resource Management Act 1991 – council’s interest is in ensuring adequate water supply and wastewater are provided and that direction in the Regional Policy Statement is met. The Environment Court has accepted council’s 274 applications to join the appeals and the matter has been set down for mediation.
Bay of Islands Marine Mammal Sanctuary
The Department of Conservation has published submissions received on their proposal for a marine mammal sanctuary. They received a total of 645 submissions, 187 of which were a template submission from Forest & Bird members (60% of submissions were in support of the proposed marine mammal sanctuary).
Key marine mammal experts opposed the proposal, citing misleading and highly distorted information from DoC, whilst the proposal was supported by local businesses who already have permits for dolphin watching, and by hapū who wanted to have greater input as kaitiaki. No timeframe for decisions has been provided.
NATIONAL INITIATIVES
Proposed change to Livestock exclusion regulations and maps
Refer to agenda item 7.2
Freshwater Farm Plans – discussion document
Refer to agenda item 7.2
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Investment and Growth Reserve – Projects Report
Update |
Future developments / reporting |
|
Extension 350 |
2020/21 quarter 4 report received as required. Contact made with evaluators regarding NRC data that could contribute. |
|
Joint Regional Economic Development Committee - documentation for inaugral meeting and workshop.
Regional economic update document and presentation for ILGACE.
Oruku Landing Conference and Event Centre - staff continue to meet regularly with WDC and NDC representatives to develop the project.
ONLINE CHANNELS
Most popular content on Facebook: Most popular post for July was the “Toxic Sea slug found on Mangawhai Heads estuary” posted on Wednesday 28 July 2021. We had a reach of 57,598 people with 5,633 people engaged.
*Engaged – number of people who ‘reacted’, commented, or shared the post
Key Performance Indicators |
Mar-21 |
Apr-21 |
May-21 |
Jun-21 |
Jul-21 |
WEB |
|
|
|
|
|
# Visits to the NRC website |
77,800 |
39,000 |
35,400 |
34,100 |
36,300 |
E-payments made |
0 |
2 |
9 |
9 |
54 |
# subscription customers (cumulative) |
1,276 |
1,278 |
1,276 |
1,287 |
1,280 |
SOCIAL MEDIA (cumulative) |
|
|
|
|
|
# Twitter followers |
1,563 |
1,560 |
1,548 |
1,555 |
1,554 |
# NRC Facebook fans |
10,300 |
10,300 |
10,400 |
10,441 |
10,454 |
# NRC Overall Facebook Reach |
173,800 |
96,800 |
145,600 |
62,800 |
90,600 |
# NRC Engaged Daily Users |
11,100 |
5,266 |
8,796 |
3,249 |
3,811 |
# CDEM Facebook fans |
25,200 |
25,200 |
25,200 |
25,271 |
25,279 |
# CDEM Overall Facebook Reach |
484,900 |
66,500 |
36,700 |
29,300 |
70,600 |
# CDEM Engaged Daily Users |
53,700 |
1,625 |
2,416 |
1,410 |
3,324 |
# Instagram followers |
1,337 |
1,360 |
1,383 |
1,399 |
1,408 |
NOTES:
May –Online payment figures for incomplete due to termination of BNZ
service.
ENVIROSCHOOLS / EDUCATION
Mangere Catchment planting day On 7 July, more than 80 Kokopu School students, plus accompanying teachers and whānau, planted 1,000 riparian plants – five species – in a wetland area on the Chestnut farm in the Mangere Catchment. NRC Land Management and Enviroschools staff ran the annual catchment event, with Dairy NZ in attendance. |
|
Project Pest Control – Whangārei Assessment Workshops
On 29 and 30 July, Project Pest Control assessment workshops were held at Rayonier’s Glenbervie Forest. Senior students from Te Kura Taumata o Panguru and five Whangārei secondary schools handed in their theory papers and were put through their practical paces of trapping a variety of animal pests, possum machine plucking and skinning. Council’s Biosecurity and Enviroschools teams joined with Can Train NZ and DoC Livestock to run the assessment workshops.
Enviroschools Communities Facilitated
Despite the school holidays, during July Enviroschools Facilitators visited and had specific interactions with 48 school and early childhood communities.
Environmental Leaders Fund
Council allocated $20,000 of funding via the annual Environmental Leaders’ Fund (ELF) to 23 early childhood centres and schools across Taitokerau.
Funding is provided for native planting and riparian restoration projects, fencing, shade house and nursery construction, and SHMAK kits for water quality monitoring.
On top of the ELF fund, another $6,575 worth of trapping hardware from council’s biosecurity fund was granted to eight schools carrying out pest control projects.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INFORMATION (LGOIMA) REQUESTS
Total LGOIMAs |
June 2020 to June 2021 |
June 2021 to June 2022 |
25 |
26 |
|
Number of LGOIMAs not responded to within 20 working days |
0 |
8.3.7 Customer Service – Community Resilience
REGIONAL TRANSPORT PLANNING
Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021/2027 (RLTP)
On Monday 28 June 2021, the Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027, approved by the Regional Transport Committee (RTC) and Northland Regional Council (NRC), was submitted to Waka Kotahi (NZ Transport Agency) through their Transport Investment online system for consideration for inclusion in the National Land Transport Programme 2021-2024.
Waka Kotahi are scheduled to release a detailed breakdown of the funding approved under each work category on 1 September 2021.
Regional Public Transport Plan 2021-2031 (RPTP)
Finalisation of the draft was delayed at the request of Waka Kotahi. All feedback has now been received on the Draft RPTP.
The completed Draft Regional Passenger Transport Plan 2021-2031 will be presented to the Regional Transport Committee at the 13 October 2021 meeting.
PASSENGER TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATION
*BusLink figures are reported one month in arrears, due to the required information being unavailable at the time of the agenda deadline.
Bus Link stats for June 2021 |
Actual |
Budget |
Variance |
Year/Date Actual |
Year/Date Budgeted |
Variance |
CityLink Passengers |
31,796 |
25,170 |
6626 |
326,894 |
330,550 |
-3,656 |
CityLink Revenue |
$38,633 |
$33,980 |
$4,653 |
$408,449 |
$446,243 |
-$37,794 |
Mid North Link Passengers |
227 |
156 |
71 |
2,213 |
1,872 |
341 |
Mid North Link Revenue |
$816 |
$780 |
$36 |
$8,030 |
$9,360 |
-$1,330 |
Hokianga Link Passengers |
89 |
78 |
11 |
1299 |
936 |
363 |
Hokianga Link Revenue |
$463 |
$543 |
-$80 |
$6,712 |
$6,511 |
$201 |
Far North Link Passengers |
398 |
447 |
-49 |
4,381 |
6,660 |
-2,279 |
Far North Link Revenue |
$1,118 |
$1,713 |
-$595 |
$11,783 |
$19,205 |
-$7421 |
Bream Bay Link Passengers |
66 |
24 |
42 |
601 |
312 |
289 |
Bream Bay Link Revenue |
$430 |
$86 |
$344 |
$4,000 |
$1,123 |
$2,877 |
Hikurangi Link Passengers |
21 |
24 |
-3 |
240 |
204 |
36 |
Hikurangi Link Revenue |
$54 |
$62 |
-$8 |
$592 |
$530 |
$63 |
Whangārei Heads Link Passengers |
8 |
24 |
-16 |
94 |
204 |
-110 |
Whangārei Heads Link Revenue |
$34 |
$104 |
-$70 |
$396 |
$886 |
-490 |
Total Mobility (TM)
|
Total Clients |
Monthly Actual Expend |
Monthly Budgeted Expend |
Monthly Variance |
Year/Date Actual Expend |
Year/Date Budgeted Expend |
Annual Variance |
June 2020 |
1,632 |
$28,910 |
$25,000 |
$3,910 |
$220,489 |
$300,000 |
-$79,511 |
June 2021 |
1,316 |
$22,177 |
$25,000 |
-$2,823 |
$261,244 |
$300,000 |
-$38,756 |
Total Mobility continues to grow every year.
Compared to the last financial year, there was $40,755 more in Total Mobility fares, 3,578 more trips, and no COVID interruptions (lockdowns).
The number of SuperGold bus passengers using the CityLink service is low, indicating a shift in older person’s travel patterns towards using Total Mobility instead of public transport due to COVID.
Ridewise (RW) has now been live for three years. As Total Mobility cards expire 3-yearly, the renewal process and database cleanse has started:
If a card is about to expire, a letter is sent to the TM client reminding them to renew.
Cards that haven’t been used for 3 years are cancelled out of the system.
Cards that haven’t been used for 2 years are suspended once they expire. Should the card be used again, it’s flagged in the system, and the council can then alert the relevant social welfare agency to try and contact the client again, reminding them to renew.
Our current Total Mobility database has 1,316 active clients. This is a 316-client decrease from the previous year – which is largely due to the database cleanse mentioned above.
For many years Northland (Whangārei District) has only had two taxi operators with two wheelchair-accessible vehicles. There wasn't a lot of confidence in the reliability and availability of these accessible vehicles. Now, our TM clients have more confidence in this service, as there are more operators to choose from and 6 wheelchair-accessible vehicles. There were 810 more hoist lift trips this year compared to last year.
ROAD SAFETY UPDATE
Road Trauma Update - 2021 Year to Date Road Death Statistics
Fatalities this year |
Far North |
Whangārei |
Kaipara |
Northland |
National |
Local roads |
2 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
101 |
State highways |
5 |
3 |
7 |
15 |
89 |
TOTAL |
7 |
5 |
9 |
21 |
190 |
Since the June 2021 Council update, unfortunately there has been one more fatality in the Kaipara District, again on the State Highway network. Driver behaviour and mistakes continue to be key factors in Northland’s crashes.
Motorcycle Safety - Ride Forever (R4E) Rider Training Update
For the 2020/21 financial year ending June 2021, 186 courses were completed. This is compared to the 2019/20 financial year, where 240 courses were completed.
The 2020/21 breakdown included riders participating in the following courses:
· Bronze Course 52 completed
· Silver Course (intermediate) 77 completed
· Gold Course (advanced) 57 completed
The decrease in numbers is believed to be due to the COVID-19 impacts and we expect there to be an increase in the uptake of courses going forward.
Road Safety Promotion/Media
Advertising themes in the Road Safety Advertising Calendar 2021/22 for the months of July and August are ‘Alcohol, Safe Vehicles, Speed and Restraints.’
Northland Road Safety have also sponsored the Northland Rugby Union NPC team with an important message of ‘Seatbelts On.’ The Northland Road Safety team were invited to an induction session with the players to present on this message and relay its importance, with the support of Northland Police. We also encouraged the players to have discussions with their communities about road safety.
The first competition match will be on Saturday 7 August, and the logo to the right will be on the player’s shorts each game. |
|
CUSTOMER SERVICES
Telephone inbound call statistics and enquiries
|
July 2021 |
Target |
Call volumes via Customer Services |
2,027 |
|
Conversion rate |
97.1% |
>95% |
Average wait time |
6 sec |
|
Calls answered in under 30 sec |
95.8% |
>90% |
Call volumes have been relatively stable, and the Customer Services team have been able to maintain service levels while reception renovations are being carried out.
Mailroom email processing performance
Excluding physical invoices and circulars, customer services has processed over 750 enquiries through the mailroom up to the 29 July, with an average processing time of 3 hours and 31 minutes from time of arrival.
Satisfaction monitoring
Feedback cards, compliments and complaints
Feedback cards have been included with the tallies for compliments and complaints, as appropriate.
Compliments received |
Total |
Service provided by a specific person/people Land Management - T Bishop |
1 |
Total compliments recorded |
1 |
|
|
Complaints received |
Total |
Staff or contractor behaviour/attitude Transport |
1 |
Disagree with decision or process Maritime (see note below) |
|
Standard of service provided Bus – Citylink |
1 |
Total complaints recorded |
2 |
There have been very few compliments or complaints formally recorded this month. Of the two complaints, one was about a late bus, and the other about a bus driver parking partially over the driveway of a business and that driver’s handling of the situation.
Although they have not been recorded in the complaints system, there have been several calls and emails relating to the increase in mooring fees.
All complaints received have been acknowledged and resolved.
Residents’ Survey
The results of the 2021 Residents’ Survey have been finalised. Over 800 residents participated in the survey. There were key findings both in areas where we’ve performed well and in areas that need our focus. As with previous years, many participants were unclear about the distinction between Northland Regional Council and their district council. The report has been published on our website and social media.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Response
At 6.16pm on 29 July 2021, a magnitude 8.1 earthquake occurred on the Alaska Peninsula. NEMA issued a National Advisory whilst the threat of a tsunami to New Zealand was assessed. At 7.57pm, NEMA issued an updated advisory indicating that coastal inundation (flooding of land areas) was not expected and at 9.13pm a ‘No Threat to New Zealand’ message was issued. The Northland CDEM Group responded to this event in accordance with standard operating procedures and provided updates to the community and stakeholders as required.
Staff Deployment to West Coast
As a result of the West Coast flooding event in late July, two Northland CDEM professionals, Shona Morgan and Jenny Calder, were deployed during the initial stages of the response as members of the national Emergency Management Assistance Team (EMAT). Shona’s deployment was for a total of 7 days and Jenny’s for 14 days.
National Emergency Management Agency - Law and Policy Reform
NEMA is working to deliver the largest change to Emergency Management policy in a generation. Called the Trifecta Programme, it includes bringing the legislation and its implementation into a more contemporary framework to ensure it is fit for purpose for future needs across all ‘4Rs’ (Reduction, Readiness, Response, Recovery) and the whole system.
As work on the Trifecta Programme has progressed, it has become clear that the scope and complexity of policy work meant that a new Emergency Management Act was more appropriate to progress than a simpler amendment bill.
The ‘Trifecta Programme’ is a comprehensive review of the CDEM Act 2002, National CDEM Plan and Guide to the CDEM Plan.
The Acting Minister for Emergency Management, Hon Kris Faafoi, has agreed to extend the timeline for legislative changes, allowing more time for engagement. The revised timeline will allow for substantive engagement from September to November 2021 including consultation on policy proposals and hui. New legislation is anticipated at the end of 2022.
CDEM Sector Strategy
NEMA and CDEM Group Managers met on 22 July to commence work on the co-design of an operational strategy focusing on how CDEM Groups partner with NEMA. This piece of work is in addition to the Trifecta work and will focus on ensuring that work programmes are aligned and that there is inter-operability.
Further development of the strategy will occur at the next NEMDG meeting on 18-19 August. A full update on the progress of the strategy development will be made available for the CDEM Joint Committee and Coordinating Executive Group at their next meetings in mid-September.
Resilience Fund
Emergency management preparedness grants have been available to local authorities to promote resilience for many years. The CDEM Resilience Fund enhances New Zealand's hazard risk resilience through the development of local and regional capability and practices. Funding is provided to specific projects that improve emergency management capability and contribute to resilience. Over the past financial year, the Northland CDEM Group has had $360k from this fund and has applied for further funding for projects for the coming year.
The process has been recently re-assessed to ensure the fund is being leveraged to its best effect. An external review of the Fund was carried out in September 2020. A Joint Working Group of NEMA staff and CDEM Group representatives reviewed the recommendations, and a new process has been developed with some small changes made following this review to focus investments on the objectives of the National Disaster Resilience Strategy.
Northland CDEM Group Plan
The 5-yearly review of the Northland CDEM Group Plan has progressed through the public submission stage. A number of submissions have been received and several changes to the plan are likely, prior to it being sent to the Minister of Emergency Management for comments. The final sign-off of the plan is scheduled for early December at the CDEM Joint Committee meeting.
Service Level Agreements
Service level agreements and work programmes for each of the territorial authorities are currently being reviewed and updated. Agreements are reviewed annually, and work programmes are adjusted as required.
MARITIME
There were only eight new incidents this month, despite some inclement weather:
· 3 lights were reported out, including the new light fitted at Parengarenga harbour. This turned out to be a defect, and the light has been returned under warranty.
· 2 vessels broke off moorings in high winds in the Bay of Islands. Both were recovered, one by the Maritime team, and one by the owner.
· A vessel partly sank in Kerikeri, which the owner resolved.
· A fishing vessel dragged anchor and grounded in Whangārei but was re-floated on the next tide.
Maritime staff are following legal process towards disposing of several derelict and abandoned vessels.
An investigation into an interaction between a tug and container ship in the Whangārei Port is ongoing after a tug experienced some damage and a crew member was injured.
One superyacht arrived in Ōpua from Tahiti and was piloted safely in and out.
The Pilot Manuals for both the Bay of Islands and Whangārei have been updated as per a four-yearly review process and are with Maritime NZ for re-certification.
Work is also ongoing to review the harbourmaster directions for shipping, the positions of the recommended anchorages, and pilot procedures for container ships.
The annual self-assessments of the safety management systems for both ports (Whangārei and Bay of Islands) have been completed.
The Harbourmaster and GM Customer Services – Community Resilience visited Napier to carry out a harbour safety review on behalf of the Port & Harbour Marine Safety Code Working Group.
The Harbourmaster chaired a successful Navigation Safety SIG in Wellington and met with the new director of Maritime NZ over concerns regarding Port State Control effectiveness. This was a key topic at the Navigation Safety SIG and is being followed closely by all harbourmasters.
Work has started on the design scoping for the Waikare replacement, with the project scoped and on time.
The Maritime team continue to be understaffed with unsuccessful recruitment of the outstanding Maritime Officer position, and the further resignation of an Administrator position. Both are being actively recruited.
The Maritime Team received a 3-yearly oil spill response audit and received high praise for up-to-date systems. The audit was undertaken by Maritime Pollution Response Services (MPRS), who reviewed Northland’s oil spill response plans, Tier 1 plans, number of trained responders, servicing of equipment, and reporting and administration.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 8.4
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Reporting on Long Term Plan 2018-2028 Performance Measures for the year ended 30 June 2021 |
From: |
Robyn Broadhurst, Policy Specialist |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Ben Lee, GM - Strategy, Governance and Engagement, on 12 August 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
This report presents the results of council’s key performance indicators, as set and adopted in the Long Term Plan 2018-2028, for the financial year 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2021.
That the report ‘Reporting on Long Term Plan 2018-2028 Performance Measures for the year ended 30 June 2021’ by Robyn Broadhurst, Policy Specialist and dated 27 July 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
The Long Term Plan 2018–2028 comprises 51 key performance indicators that measure aspects of council’s service provision across five activity groupings:
· Governance and engagement
· Regulatory services
· Environmental services
· River management
· Customer services and community resilience.
Each performance measure provides a snapshot of the activity’s performance.
Of the 51 measures, 29 have been achieved, and 22 have not been achieved. It is important to note that a number of those measures not met are outside of council’s control. A summary of all measures is set out in the table below. The full results will be in the final annual report, which is scheduled to be presented to council for adoption in October this year.
This is the last report on the measures of this long term plan, with new measures being reported on in 2022 as a result of the adoption of the Long Term Plan 2021-2031.
Governance and engagement | Ratonga whakahaere whakauru
1.1 Governance |
||
1.1.1 Maintain effective, open and transparent democratic processes
|
||
Percentage of official information requests that are responded to within 20 working days. |
100% compliance |
96% – not achieved
8 out of 187 LGOIMA requests were not responded to within 20 working days |
Percentage of time that council receives a favourable ("unqualified") audit opinion on its Long Term Plan, Annual Plan, and Annual Report. |
100% compliance |
100% – achieved
|
Percentage of time that elected members attend council meetings. |
90% compliance |
98% – achieved |
Percentage of the community surveyed that is satisfied with the way council involves the public in the decisions it makes. |
Improve |
Not achieved
The 2021 survey changed focus to determine if people were getting sufficient information and opportunity to be involved in the consultation process, which 48% said they were. 34% were not aware of consultation opportunities, 12% found the information either difficult to understand or in an incompatible format, and 8% did not want to be involved. |
1.2 Māori relationships |
||
1.2.1 Establish enduring and robust governance relationships between council and Māori of Taitokerau
|
||
Ten meetings (five formal meetings and five marae-based meetings) of the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party are held each 12-month period. |
10 meetings held annually |
8 meetings – not achieved
In total, six formal meetings and two regional hui were held. Cancellation of regional hui by the hapū/iwi hosts was due to COVID-19 concerns and, in one case, a clash with another significant hui that would have precluded many attending. It’s noted that there were 12 TTMAC subgroup meetings (Māori Technical Advisory Group, Economic Development Subgroup, Tangata Whenua Water Advisory Group Selection Panel, Strategic Priorities Workshop) as well as TTMAC tangata whenua attendance at other working parties (Water and Land, Planning and Regulatory, Biosecurity and Biodiversity, Climate Change). |
1.2.2 Provide opportunities for Māori to participate in council processes
|
||
Percentage of time council meets all relevant requirements of Treaty of Waitangi settlement legislation. |
100% compliance |
95.9% – not achieved
This measure comprises three elements: the recording of statutory acknowledgements in regional plans; attendance and support of co-governance committees; and circulation of consent applications to Treaty settlement groups.
Council has achieved two of these elements in full, with the third (the circulation of consent applications) achieved in part. This was due to 89 bore consents out of 637 failing to be circulated. |
Percentage of time targeted pre-consultation engagement is undertaken with Māori during council's statutory Resource Management Act planning processes. |
100% compliance |
100% – achieved |
1.3 Communication and engagement |
||
1.3.1 Support and deliver environmental education initiatives
|
||
Percentage of schools and kindergartens participating in the Enviroschools programme. Schools include primary, intermediate and secondary schools. |
Maintain or increase |
68% – achieved
2019/20 result = 66% |
1.3.2 Promote effective community engagement
|
||
Number of subscribers to online and social media channels (includes social media, eNewsletters and web alerts). |
25% annual increase
(number and percentage increase to be reported) |
11% – not achieved
This is due to a shift in focus from increasing FB likes/followers to improving reach and overall engagement with our audience. |
Frequency of
engagement with council's Collaborative Community Engagement Groups. |
Annual engagement with 100% of groups
(Actual number of groups and percentage compliance to be reported) |
87.8% – not achieved
Of 140 groups, council achieved engagement with 123. Reasons for not achieving engagement included that the group wasn't functioning or active, that email contact only was sufficient (the criteria requires face to face engagement), or that contact was not able to be made. In one instance the group wasn't active because the marae was under repair, and in another instance a new group was actively being recruited but not yet established. In other cases, engagement was with other similar groups or groups under a different banner. Three groups were removed from the list as they no long exist. |
1.4 Economic development |
||
1.4.1 Invest in economic development projects and ventures within Northland to improve Northland's economic performance
|
||
Northland Inc's compliance with Local Government Act requirements relating to its Statement of Intent (SOI). |
100% compliance |
100% – achieved
|
Percentage of Northland Inc's SOI key performance indicators achieved by 30 June each year. |
100% compliance |
79% – not achieved
Three of the 14 targets were not met. One relates to the development of a long-term economic development strategy for the region, which is being undertaken in 2021/22. The other two relate to the implementation of high impact projects and the number of inward delegations hosted. COVID-19 restrictions reduced the opportunities to achieve these, in addition to a Whangārei District Council decision to not proceed with the Oruku Landing Conference and Event Centre project as part of their LTP 2021-2031. |
Regulatory services |Ratonga a ture
2.1 Planning and policy |
||
2.1.1 Develop and maintain regional planning documents for the management of Northland's natural and physical resources
|
||
Develop a new Regional Plan. |
2020/201: Notify any plan changes required to implement the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPS Freshwater) |
Not achieved
The Proposed Regional Plan is not yet operative – there are still Environment Court appeals to resolve. The process and timing for resolving the appeals is largely out of the council’s control. |
Make changes to the new Regional Plan and Regional Policy Statement (RPS) as necessary to implement national direction and to respond to resource management issues. |
2020/21: Notify plan change to identify and protect significant freshwater biodiversity sites in the Regional Plan (if not addressed through proposed plan process in 218) |
Not achieved
The release of the NPS Freshwater 2020 has largely made the targets redundant. These targets have been overtaken by the water quality plan change council has committed to implement the requirements of the NPS Freshwater 2020. |
2.2 Consents |
||
2.2.1 Provide efficient and effective processing and administering of resource consents
|
||
Percentage of all resource consent applications that are processed within the statutory timeframes. |
98% compliance |
99.4% – achieved |
2.3 Monitoring (compliance monitoring) |
||
2.3.1 Provide efficient and effective compliance monitoring of resource consents
|
||
Percentage of monitored resource consents that are not graded as significantly non-compliant. |
90% |
96% – achieved |
Percentage of monitored permitted farm dairy effluent activities that are not graded as significantly non-compliant. |
90% |
88% – not achieved
Of the 193 permitted activity dairy farms inspected in 2020/21, 170 of them were not significantly non-compliant. This measure is dependent on landowner behaviour which, while influenced by council activities, is also influenced by factors outside of council’s control. |
Percentage of consents for industrial, municipal sewage and farm discharges, and major water takes requiring monitoring, that are monitored as per the council's consent monitoring programme. |
100% |
87.3% – not achieved
Of the 964 regimes that required monitoring in the 2020/21 year, 842 were undertaken as per the programme. Non-achievement was largely due to staff resourcing issues. |
2.3.2 Efficient and effective response to and resolution of reported environmental incidents
|
||
Percentage of environmental incidents with more than minor effects reported to the Environmental Hotline resolved within 30 working days. |
80% resolved within 30 working days |
76.6% – not achieved
Of the 47 incidents that had more than minor effects reported, 11 were not able to be resolved within 20 working days. There were several incidents that took some time to satisfactorily resolve. In most cases, the adverse effects had ceased, but a final resolution had not been reached within the 20 working days. |
2.4 Monitoring (State of the environment monitoring) |
||
2.4.1 Gather and make available information on the suitability of water bodies for swimming and shellfish collection
|
||
Monitor at least 50 popular swimming sites weekly during the summer for faecal indicator bacteria and publish the results (sites are monitored weekly in the summer from late November/early December to late February/early March). |
50 or more sites monitored weekly during summer |
58 sites – achieved
|
Monitor at least 15 popular shellfish collection sites weekly during the summer and publish the results (sites are monitored weekly in the summer from late November/early December to late February/early March). |
15 or more sites monitored weekly during summer |
15 sites – achieved |
2.4.2 Monitor the life-supporting capacity of water (fresh and marine), uses and values
|
||
Percentage of sites monitored for macroinvertebrates showing improved or maintained trend in their Macroinvertebrate Community Indices (MCI). |
At least 90% |
Not achieved
The measure could not be assessed as insufficient data was collected. Also, the database KiECO is not fully set up yet. The trends could therefore not be calculated and assessed against baseline levels. |
Percentage of fish monitoring sites showing improved or maintained trend in their Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI). |
At least 90% |
Not achieved
The measure could not be assessed as insufficient data was collected. Also, the database KiECO is not fully set up yet. The trends could therefore not be calculated and assessed against baseline levels. The fish monitoring programme has not been fully completed since it was established at 25 monitoring sites due to resourcing issues. |
Percentage of lake sites monitored for ecological status showing improved or maintained trend in their Submerged Plant Indices (SPI). |
At least 90% |
77% – not achieved
Of 13 lakes that received submerged plant index monitoring, three showed a non-significant downward trend due to invasive weed expansion in one and a drop in native condition index or decreasing bottom limits in two (possibly linked to drought conditions and water quality). Five remained stable or showed slight improvements, two showed improvements above 5%, and three showed significant improvement above 15%. This resulted in a positive shift in overall ecological rankings. One lake had a significant decrease in invasive indices due to pest control. |
Percentage of lake sites monitored for level of nutrient enrichment showing improved or maintained trend in their Trophic Level Indices (TLI). |
At least 90% |
100% – achieved
|
Comprehensively monitor at least 40 coastal sites monthly for general water quality. |
40 sites monitored annually |
42 sites – achieved |
2.4.3 Monitor the standard of ambient air quality in Northland
|
||
Percentage of air sheds meeting the national air quality environmental standards. |
100% compliance |
100% – achieved |
Environmental services | Ratonga i te taiao
3.1 Natural Hazard Management |
||
3.1.1 Identify and make available information on areas potentially affected by natural hazards through mapping
|
||
Number (and percentage) of river catchments flood-mapped to identify river flooding hazards. |
2020/21: 129 (100%) |
100% – achieved |
3.2 Hydrology |
||
3.2.1 Provide information on water resources including rainfall, flood levels and ground water
|
||
Percentage of time that flood level monitoring is accurate to enable flood warnings to be developed. |
100% compliance |
100% – achieved |
3.3 Biosecurity |
||
3.3.1 Promote community involvement in pest management
|
||
Increase in hectares of land under Community Pest Control Area Plans (CPCAs) per annum. |
Increase by 5000 ha annually |
5,731ha increase – achieved |
Increase in kiwi populations within council supported programmes monitored in accordance with the standardised Department of Conservation kiwi call count monitoring scheme. |
Increase by 2% annually |
Provisional data only TBC – achieved Baseline data = 7.2 calls per hour |
3.3.2 Implement measures to slow the introduction and spread of new and established marine pests
|
||
Survey at least 2000 vessel hulls for marine pests each year as part of marine biosecurity surveillance programme. |
2000 hulls annually |
2,145 hulls inspected – achieved |
3.4 Biodiversity |
||
3.4.1 Maintain and enhance indigenous biodiversity and eco-systems around our rivers, lakes, wetlands and coastal margins
|
||
2020/21: 15 |
16.5 wetlands – achieved |
|
Number of plants provided through CoastCare programme. |
2020/21: 13,000 |
14,779 – achieved |
Number of objectives met that are set out in annual work plan for Freshwater Improvement (objectives are set out in Ministry for the Environment project work plans for the Northern Wairoa and Dune Lakes Freshwater Improvement Fund projects). |
100% of objectives met |
90% – not achieved
One of the seven main tasks in the work plan agreed with MfE for the FIF dune lakes project was only partially agreed, while six were fully achieved. Of the one task not achieved (herbicide treatment of three lakes), one lake was successfully treated and a change request was approved by MfE to treat a different set of lakes. Plans were progressed to undertake this work in Year 5. |
3.5 Land and water |
||
3.5.1 Promote improved water quality by providing advice and funding on sustainable land management, soil conservation, and biodiversity through farm management and catchment management initiatives
|
||
Area in hectares (ha) of land being actively managed under a sustainable farm environment plan. |
Increase 25,000 ha per annum |
Not achieved
As per a council decision, Land Management Advisors are no longer writing farm environment plans. |
Area in (ha) of highly erodible land being actively managed under a farm environment plan. |
Maintain or increase (from baseline data) |
Not achieved
As per a council decision, Land Management Advisors are no longer writing farm environment plans. |
Number of subsidised poplar poles provided for erosion-prone land by the Flyger Road nursery. |
2020/21: 8,000 |
Not achieved
The extreme drought the previous summer killed a lot of poles and landowners were reluctant to replant until the ground had become wetter. In response, a range of hardier cultivars that are more tolerant of dry exposed conditions have been planted in the nursery. However, there will be a 3yr delay before these cultivars are available for planting. |
Kilometres of waterway margins protected to reduce sediment, nutrient run-off and general contamination of water, funded by the Environment Fund. |
Increase (from baseline data) |
147kms – not achieved
2018/19 result = 297kms 2019/20 result = 181kms
$300k was transferred to the Kaipara Moana Remediation for projects estimated to be 66.7kms of fencing. These projects have until November to do their fencing; therefore we won’t have an accurate measure of what fencing has been until then. |
River management | Ratonga whakahaere a awa
4.1 River management |
||
4.1.1 Build, monitor and maintain flood protection schemes to protect life and property
|
||
Number of flood events occurring as a result of failures of flood protection systems for the Awanui, Whangārei, and Kāeo schemes below specified design levels (the number of flood events arising due to the failure of the flood protections systems is considered to be the most direct measure of whether these systems are repaired and renewed to the standards set out in the activity management plans). |
Zero |
Zero failures – achieved
|
Customer services and community resilience | Ratonga manawaroa a hapori
5.1 Customer services |
||
5.1.1 Providing meaningful customer service
|
||
Percentage of customers surveyed that are satisfied with the quality of service received following an interaction with council. |
Maintain or increase (specific targets will be set once baseline established) |
45% – not achieved
2018/19 result = 52% 2019/20 result = 58%
Result have been distorted by small number of total respondents who have contacted the council in the last year (69). The drop reflects the views of five people. Many of the respondents also confused district council and regional council activities. |
5.2 Civil defence emergency management |
||
5.2.1 Provide accurate and timely flood warnings to enable communities to take precautionary measures to protect life and property
|
||
Percentage of time that accurate flood warnings are issued in accordance with the council's flood warnings procedures. |
100% compliance |
No weather events that required activation |
5.2.2 Maintain an effective civil defence emergency management system
|
||
Percentage of time that emergencies (emergencies that require the activation of an emergency operations centre) are debriefed within one month, and noted improvements are incorporated into the appropriate emergency operating procedures and response plans. |
100% annually |
100% – achieved |
5.3 Oil pollution response |
||
5.3.1 Maintain an efficient and responsive oil pollution response
|
||
Maintain a minimum of 30 responders at all times |
30 responders – achieved |
|
5.4 Harbour safety and navigation |
||
5.4.1 Provide regional navigational safety control of shipping and small craft, provide aids to navigation to ensure the region's navigable waters are safe for people to use, and manage the region's moorings
|
||
100% compliance |
100% – achieved
|
|
Percentage of time that pilotage in the Bay of Islands is provided in accordance with the safety management system. |
100% compliance |
100% – achieved
|
Percentage of reported aids to navigation faults that are responded to within five working days. |
100% compliance |
100% – achieved |
Percentage of moorings either serviced within the past three years or booked to be serviced. |
95% of moorings |
98.33% – achieved |
5.5 Transport |
||
5.5.1 Provide an efficient and effective public bus service
|
||
Maintain 310,000 per annum |
326,894 – achieved
|
|
Percentage of passengers satisfied with overall Whangārei bus service (passenger satisfaction rating of six or above on a 10 point scale). |
95% compliance |
92% – not achieved
Citylink passenger survey was completed in April 2021 with the greatest dissatisfaction being around the frequency of the buses. |
5.5.2 Plan for the future transport needs of the region
|
||
Develop and maintain statutory transport planning documents including the Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) and Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP). |
2020/21: Adopt RLTP |
Achieved
|
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 8.5
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Legislative compliance for the period 1 January to 30 June 2021 |
From: |
Kyla Carlier, Acting Strategy Policy and Planning Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Chief Executive Officer, on 12 August 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
This report presents the findings of council’s legislative compliance programme for the six-month period 1 January – 30 June 2021
That the report ‘Legislative compliance for the period 1 January to 30 June 2021’ by Kyla Carlier, Acting Strategy Policy and Planning Manager and dated 30 July 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
The Office of the Auditor-General encourages local authorities to apply a systematic process to managing the legal risks that might arise in relation to the functions and activities that they are responsible for.
Council’s current legislative compliance framework provides assurance for compliance with legislation that is fundamental to the council’s operations and/or poses significant potential risk. This includes:
• The Local Government Act 2002
• The Local Government (Financial Reporting and Prudence) Regulations 2014
• The Non-financial Performance Measures Rules 2013
• The Local Government Borrowing Act 2011
• The Local Government (Rating) Act 2002
• The Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987
• The Local Authorities (Member’s Interests) Act 1968
• The Resource Management Act 1991
• The Health and Safety at Work Act 2015
• The Holidays Act 2003
• The Employment Relations Act 2000
• The Biosecurity Act 1993
• The Building Act 2004
• The Fire Security Act
• The Civil Defence and Emergency Management Act 2002
• The Land Transport Act 1998
• The Maritime Transport Act 1994
• The Fire and Emergency New Zealand Act 2017.
There are several other pieces of legislation that also have relevance to council operations, but compliance is managed via other internal processes and procedures.
Legislative compliance reporting is completed six-monthly by group managers. Reporting requires group managers to confirm compliance (or otherwise) with the relevant legislation and identify action that has been carried out to ensure that council is aware of any new legislation or regulations. Group managers must also sign a declaration confirming their level of compliance.
Reporting has been completed for the six-month period 1 January – 30 June 2021, and the results are reported here by exception.
Reporting indicated that compliance was achieved with all of council’s core legislation, with two exceptions. Part compliance was achieved with:
· The Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act (LGOIMA). Council complied with all formal meeting procedure requirements regarding notification of meetings, availability of agendas and detailing the specific grounds to exclude the public from any part of the proceedings. However, council did not fully comply with the requirement to respond to LGOIMA requests within 20 working days. Any non-compliance was reported monthly to council via the Chief Executive’s Report, and response systems ensure that requestors are advised of the right of referral to the Ombudsman.
· Resource Management Act 1991. Council complied with all requirements in relation to preparation of the Proposed Regional Plan. However, council is required under the act to report on monitoring of the efficiency and effectiveness of the Regional Policy Statement (RPS) by May 2021. Council decided at its meeting of 21 April to put the review on hold and review the decision in six months (Sept 21) due to the significant uncertainty regarding resource management reform, and significant current workloads.
· Privacy Act 2020. Part compliance was achieved, with two minor privacy breaches reported.
No new legislation requiring consideration of implementation was reported by group managers, who continued to stay informed via ListServs, national steering groups, parliamentary alerts, legal advice, advisors, and audit processes.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 9.1
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Receipt of Committee Minutes |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Support Manager, on 12 August 2021 |
That the unconfirmed minutes of the:
· Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee - 22 July 2021; and
· Joint Regional Economic Development Committee – 30 July 2021
be received.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee - 22 July 2021 ⇩
Attachment 2: Joint Regional Economic Development Committee - 30 July 2021 ⇩
Council Meeting ITEM: 10.0
17 August 2021
TITLE: |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to recommend that the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider the confidential matters detailed below for the reasons given.
1. That the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider confidential matters.
2. That the general subject of the matters to be considered whilst the public is excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to this matter, and the specific grounds under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution, are as follows:
Item No. |
Item Issue |
Reasons/Grounds |
10.1 |
Confirmation of Minutes - Confidential Council Meeting Minutes 28 July 2021 |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting. |
10.2 |
Human Resources Report |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a). |
10.3 |
Nomination of Directors to Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a). |
10.4 |
Enterprise System for Approval to Execute Contract |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect information where the making available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information s7(2)(b)(ii) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i). |
10.5 |
NIWA Kingfish RAS Project |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i). |
10.6 |
Introduction of Two New Fund Managers into the Long-Term Investment Fund |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to prevent the disclosure or use of official information for improper gain or improper advantage s7(2)(j). |
3. That the Independent Financial Advisors be permitted to stay during business with the public excluded.
Considerations
1. Options
Not applicable. This is an administrative procedure.
2. Significance and Engagement
This is a procedural matter required by law. Hence when assessed against council policy is deemed to be of low significance.
3. Policy and Legislative Compliance
The report complies with the provisions to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting as detailed in sections 47 and 48 of the Local Government Official Information Act 1987.
4. Other Considerations
Being a purely administrative matter; Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.