Council Tuesday 16 November 2021 at 10.30am
|
|
|
|
Council Meeting
16 November 2021
Northland Regional Council Agenda
Meeting to be held in the remotely
on Tuesday 16 November 2021, commencing at 10.30am
Recommendations contained in the council agenda are NOT council decisions. Please refer to council minutes for resolutions.
RĪMITI (Item) Page
1.0 Ngā Mahi Whakapai (Housekeeping)
Key Health and Safety points to note:
· If the fire alarm goes off – exit down the stairwell to the assembly point which is the visitor carpark.
· Earthquakes – drop, cover and hold
· Visitors please make sure you have signed in at reception, and that you sign out when you leave. Please wear your name sticker.
· The toilets are on the opposite side of the stairwell.
· Please adhere to the recommended Covid alert guidance that applies.
2.0 Karakia Timatanga – Tauāki ā roto (Opening karakia)
3.0 Ngā Whakapahā (apologies)
Deputy Chair, Justin Blaikie
4.0 Ngā Whakapuakanga (DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST)
5.0 Ngā Whakaae Miniti me te Mahere Mahi (Council Minutes and Action Sheet)
5.1 Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meeting 19 October 2021 6
5.2 Receipt of Action Sheet 17
6.0 Ngā Ripoata Putea (Financial Reports)
6.1 Financial Report to 31 October 2021 19
6.2 Regional Rates Collection - update to September 2021 23
7.0 Ngā Take (Decision Making Matters)
7.1 Annual Report on the Biosecurity Operational Plan 28
7.2 Clean Hull Plan - Update to a National Pathway Management Plan 31
7.3 Hundertwasser Art Centre: Revoking a condition of funding to appoint a council representative to the governance group 36
7.4 Draft NRC submission - Emissions reduction discussion document 38
8.0 Ngā Ripoata Mahi (Operational Reports)
8.1 Health and safety report 57
8.2 Chair's Report to Council 61
8.3 Chief Executive’s Report to Council 63
9.0 Receipt of Committee Minutes and Working Party/Group Updates
9.1 Receipt of Committee Minutes 91
9.2 Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings 100
10.0 Kaupapa ā Roto (Business with the Public Excluded) 101
10.1 Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - Council Meeting 19 October 2021
10.2 Human Resources Report
ACC - Accident Compensation Corporation ALGIM - Association of Local Government Information Management AMA - Aquaculture Management Area AMP - Asset Management Plan/Activity Management Plan AP - Annual Plan BOI - Bay of Islands BOPRC - Bay of Plenty Regional Council CAPEX - Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets) CBEC - Community, Business and Environment Centre CCO – Council Controlled Organisation CCTO – Council Controlled Trading Organisation CDEM - Civil Defence Emergency Management CEEF – Chief Executives Environment Forum CEG - Co-ordinating Executive Group CEO - Chief Executive Officer CIMS - Co-ordinated Incident Management System (emergency management structure) CMA - Coastal Marine Area CPCA - Community Pest Control Areas CRI - Crown Research Institute DHB - District Health Board DOC - Department of Conservation DP – District Plan E350 – Extension 350 programme ECA - Environmental Curriculum Award ECAN - Environment Canterbury EECA - Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority EF - Environment Fund EMA - Employers and Manufacturers Association EOC - Emergency Operations Centre EPA - Environmental Protection Authority ETS - Emissions Trading Scheme FDE - Farm Dairy Effluent FNDC - Far North District Council FNHL - Far North Holdings Limited FPP - First Past the Post GE - Genetic Engineering GIS - Geographic Information System GMO - Genetically Modified Organism HBRC - Hawke's Bay Regional Council HEMP - Hapū Environmental Management Plan Horizons - Brand name of Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council HR - Human Resources HSNO - Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act HSWA - Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 IEMP - Iwi Environmental Management Plan ILGACE - Iwi and Local Government Chief Executives Forum IPPC - Invited Private Plan Change IRIS - Integrated Regional Information System KDC - Kaipara District Council KPI - Key Performance Indicator LAWA – Land, Air, Water Aotearoa LEA - Local Electoral Act 2001 LGA - Local Government Act 2002 LGNZ - Local Government New Zealand LGOIMA - Local Government Official Information & Meetings Act 1987 LIDAR – Light detection and ranging LTI – Long time injury LTP - Long Term Plan MBIE – Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment MFE - Ministry for the Environment MFL – Māori Freehold Land MHWS - Mean High Water Springs MMH - Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited MNZ - Maritime New Zealand MOH - Ministry of Health MOT - Ministry of Transport |
MPI - Ministry for Primary Industries MSD - Ministry of Social Development NCMC - National Crisis Management Centre NDHB - Northland District Health Board NEMA – National Emergency Management Agency NES - National Environmental Standards NFT – Northland Forward Together NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation NIF - Northland Intersectoral Forum NINC - Northland Inc. Limited NIWA - National Institute of Water and Atmosphere NORTEG - Northland Technical Advisory Group NPS - National Policy Statement NZCPS - New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement NZRC - New Zealand Refining Company (Marsden Point) NZTA – Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency NZTE - New Zealand Trade and Enterprise NZWWA - New Zealand Water and Wastes Association OFI - Opportunity for Improvement\ OPEX – Operating Expenditures OSH - Occupational Safety & Health OTS – Office of Treaty Settlements PCBU - Person Conducting Business or Undertaking PGF – Provincial Growth Fund PPE - Personal Protective Equipment RAP - Response Action Plan RBI - Regional Broadband Initiative RCP - Regional Coastal Plan RFI - Request for Information RFP - Request for Proposal RLTP - Regional Land Transport Plan RMA - Resource Management Act 1991 RMG - Resource Managers Group (Regional Councils) RMZ - Riparian Management Zone ROI - Return on Investment RP – Regional Plan RPMP - Regional Pest Management Plan RPMS - Regional Pest Management Strategy RPS - Regional Policy Statement RPTP – Regional Public Transport Plan RRSAP – Regional Road Safety Action Plan RSG – Regional Sector Group RSHL - Regional Software Holdings Ltd RTC - Regional Transport Committee RTO - Regional Tourism Organisation SIG – Special Interest Group SIPO - Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives SITREP - Situation Report SOE - State of Environment (or) State Owned Enterprise SOI – Statement of Intent SOLGM - Society of Local Government Managers STV - Single Transferable Vote TAG - Technical Advisory Group Tier 1 - Site level plan or response for an oil spill Tier 2 - Regional level plan or response to an oil spill Tier 3 - National level plan or response to an oil spill TLA - Territorial Local Authority – City & District Councils TON – Top of the North (regions) TTMAC – Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party TTNEAP – Tai Tokerau Northland Economic Action Plan TMP - Treasury Management Plan TOR - Terms of Reference TPK - Te Puni Kōkiri (Ministry of Maori Development) TUANZ - Telecommunications Users Association of NZ UNISA - Upper North Island Strategic Alliance WDC - Whangarei District Council WHHIF - Whangarei Harbour Health Improvement Fund WRC - Waikato Regional Council WSMP - Workplace Safety Management Practices |
Council Meeting item: 5.1
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meeting 19 October 2021 |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist |
Authorised by: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 09 November 2021 |
That the minutes of the council meeting held on 19 October 2021, be confirmed as a true and correct record.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Minutes of the council meeting - 19 October 2021 ⇩
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Receipt of Action Sheet |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist |
Authorised by: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 09 November 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
The purpose of this report is to enable the meeting to receive the current action sheet.
That the action sheet be received.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Council Action Sheet - November 2021 ⇩
Council Meeting item: 6.1
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Financial Report to 31 October 2021 |
From: |
Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 09 November 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
This report is to inform council of the year to date (YTD) financial result to October 2021. Council has achieved a YTD surplus after transfers to and from reserves of $6.81M, which is $441K favourable to budget. While there has been an improvement in the shortfall in revenue Covid-19 continues to negatively impact our ability to deliver our work program. This has resulted in lower than expected expenditure at this point in the financial year.
That the report ‘Financial Report to 31 October 2021’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 3 November 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
Revenue
Year to date revenue is $25.41M, which is ($56K) or (0.2%) below budget.
Council Meeting item: 6.1
16 November 2021
Across council there is a $670K (September YTD: $495K) favourable salaries variance predominantly due to the time to complete recruitment of positions identified in the LTP (Long Term Plan) and some vacancies already present at the end of 2020/21. Of this $11K (September YTD: $36K) is related to subsidised work programmes. This variance is partially offset by $231K (September YTD: $207K) of annual leave earned not taken.
Transfers to reserves
For the year to date there has been a net transfer to reserves of $2.40M compared to a budgeted net transfer to reserves of $2.11M. This is predominantly due to:
$113K more than budgeted transfers to river reserves due to lower than budgeted YTD expenditure relating to maintenance and river clearance works not occurring when budgeted and higher than budgeted subsidies on flood schemes.
$104K more than budgeted transfers to bus reserves due to lower than budgeted YTD expenditure.
$79K less than budgeted transfers from the enterprise system reserve due to lower than budgeted personnel costs YTD arising from project vacancies not yet filled.
Capital Expenditure
Capital expenditure of $910K is in line with the budget of $912K.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 6.2
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Regional Rates Collection - update to September 2021 |
From: |
Simon Crabb, Finance Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 05 November 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
The three district councils administer the collection of the regional council rates on our behalf. The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the collection of this year’s current rates and the rate arrears owing to the regional council by each district council.
Table One below summarises the level of rates collected in the first quarter of the 2021/22 financial year and the total outstanding rate balances at 30 September 2021.
Overall, the three district councils collected a total of 32% of our annual rate strike in the three months to 30 September 2021. (As a comparative, 33% was collected for the same period in the prior financial year).
That the report ‘Regional Rates Collection - update to September 2021’ by Simon Crabb, Finance Manager and dated 27 October 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
Whangarei District Council (WDC)
The Whangarei District Council collected 36.9% of our annual rate strike to the end of September of this financial year (2020/21: 40.1%). WDC advised that their Q1 collections were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic as counter payments were suspended while in level 3 and that by the end of October their current year collection rate had returned to normal.
22.1% ($120k) of the WDC outstanding rate arrears balance (2020/21: 30.3%; $183k) was also collected in the first three months of this financial year resulting in a closing rate arrears balance of $424k. WDC advised that their Rate arrear collections have been impacted by the extension of last year’s Q1 payment date (offered as part of the COVID-19 response relief package), and it has taken some months to get their arrear collections rate back to normal after this extension.
Kaipara District Council (KDC)
The Kaipara District Council collected 29% of our annual rate strike to the end of September of this financial year (2020/21: 27.7%).
10.3% ($88k) of the KDC outstanding rate arrears balance (2020/21: 11.1 %; $99k) has also been collected in the first three months of this financial year resulting in a closing total rate arrears balance of $764k.
Far North District Council (FNDC)
The Far North District Council has collected 26.1% of our annual rate strike to the end of September of this financial year, (2020/21: 25.3%).
7.6% ($189k) of the FNDC outstanding rate arrears balance has also been collected in the first three months of this financial year, (2020/21: 4.8%; $194k), resulting in a closing rate arrears balance (excluding current year rates) still to be collected of $2.3m. Māori freehold land (MFL) accounts for $1.2m of the total rate arrears balance.
Attachment 1 is the revenue and collections report provided by FNDC outlining the actions they have in place to collect outstanding rate arrears.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Far North District Council: Rating Revenue and Collections Report - Q1 2021/22 ⇩
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Annual Report on the Biosecurity Operational Plan |
From: |
Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity, on 09 November 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The Annual report on the Biosecurity Operational Plan 2020-2021 is a statutory requirement of the Biosecurity Act. The attached report highlights the substantial amount of work undertaken by the Biosecurity team, in partnership with tangata whenua, community groups, crown agencies and national initiatives such as Predator Free 2050. Despite the effects of covid and staff shortages causing some disruption to delivery, over 81 per cent of the performance targets have been achieved or achieved in part.
1. That the report ‘Annual Report on the Biosecurity Operational Plan” by Don McKenzie, Group Manager Biosecurity- Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao and dated 2 November 2021, be received.
2. That council adopts the Biosecurity Annual Report as the record of actions undertaken during the 2020-2021 year and in accordance with the objectives of the Pest Management and Marine Pathway Management Plan 2017-2027.
3. That the Biosecurity Group Manager be delegated authority to make any minor design, editing, grammatical or accuracy amendments, prior to the Annual Report being published.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Council determines not to adopt the Annual Report |
Provides an opportunity for changes in the way data is presented or other significant edits. |
Delays the production of a final copy for wider community and agency distribution. Further extends the delay in meeting the statutory deadline of end of November |
2 |
Council adopts the report |
The report can be distributed to community and agency networks promptly. |
NIL |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 2, that council adopt the Biosecurity Annual Report. It is the intention of staff that the Annual Report and the results, once adopted by council, will form the basis for greater public engagement and promotion of the work council.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
This decision is a statutory requirement concerning reporting and will have no direct impact on the environment.
2. Community views
This decision is unlikely to have any impact on external agencies, Māori, and other interest groups. They may, however, be interested in the content and have a view on the progress being made on the performance measures.
3. Māori impact statement
This report relates to a council administrative matter and therefore does not have a direct impact on Māori. Any potential impacts of future related decisions will be addressed in the relevant reports. Financial implications
There are no financial implications of this decision, and the Annual Report has been produced using current resourcing.
The financial statement shows that the total biosecurity operational deficit was 0.4% ($49,400) greater than budgeted expenditure due to minor operational overspends.
4. Implementation issues
While this decision concerns reporting on operational matters, as indicated above, it is intended that council will seek to communicate these results as broadly as possible so that our community has a good understanding of the work being undertaken.
5. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy. It has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan and/or is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
6. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
This decision is consistent with the requirements of section 100b of the Biosecurity Act 1993.
Background/Tuhinga
Northland Regional Council is the management agency responsible for developing and implementing the Northland Regional Pest and Marine Pathway Management Plan 2017-2027 in accordance with the Biosecurity Act 1993 (hereafter referred to as the Pest Plan). The Pest Plan is a combination of the eradication or effective management of specified pests (or groups of pests), and a marine pathway plan is designed to prevent and manage the spread of harmful marine organisms via boat hull fouling within Northland coastal waters.
An Operational Plan is prepared and reviewed annually as a requirement of the Biosecurity Act 1993 (section 100B). It describes how the Pest Plan will be implemented for a given year and Council has a statutory requirement under the Act to report on progress in the previous year by the end of November 2021.
This Annual Report on the Operational Plan 2020-2021 (attached) is the third produced under the 10-year Pest Plan. The report notes progress made against aims, objectives and key performance indicators contained in the Operational Plan and expands on these where appropriate.
Summary of results
The report describes 64 performance measures, of which 81% have been achieved or achieved in part. Ten performance measures have not been achieved due to covid causing delays, staff capacity issues which have since been addressed as part of the Long-Term Plan or involve measures where the data has not been available in the current year.
The data shows that several event days and workshops for pest plants and kauri protection could not be held due to covid restrictions. Although these events were reduced in number, 95 people attended weed workshops throughout the year and over 960 students received kauri protection training and a further 121 students attained NCEA credits as part of animal pest training.
Community pest control groups were very active over the year and staff provided over 12,600 traps to customers and received more than 4,000 pest animal and 1,200 pest plant enquires.
The marine team exceeded the hull inspection target of 2,000 per annum and conducted marine pest workshops and stakeholder awareness training. In addition, a strong partnership was developed with Patuharakeke to undertake marine surveys and assist with training kaimahi.
Public engagement across social media activities was high and the Facebook video collection has received more than 270,000 biosecurity page views since inception which accounted for 36% of the total council Facebook page views. The Pest Control Hub data also shows a significant increase in page views, approximately three times that of the previous year across the key themes of biosecurity including Plant, Animal, Disease Freshwater and Marine.
Partnerships with other agencies such as the Ministry for Primary Industries, Department of Conservation and Predator Free 2050 also grew and $3.8M of external agency funding was received to support new and existing projects. In addition, the number of bicultural collaborations with iwi, hapū and whanau was a new measure introduced this year and more than ten partnerships exist across marine, kauri protection, wilding pine control, animal, and pest plant biosecurity.
The increased interest in biosecurity activities is evidence that Northlanders are seeking more information on what kinds of pest management services are available and reflects the growing awareness of national campaigns such as “Predator Free 2050”, and regional initiatives like the “Kiwi Coast”.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: 2020-2021 Annual Report on the Biosecurity Operational Plan (separately circulated)
Council Meeting item: 7.2
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Clean Hull Plan - Update to a National Pathway Management Plan |
From: |
Kathryn Lister, Biosecurity Manager Marine |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity, on 09 November 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
One of the highest risk “pathways” for marine pests spreading to new sites, including into new regions, is hitchhiking on boat hulls in the form of biofouling. Staff from Northland, Auckland, Waikato, and Bay of Plenty regional/unitary councils, along with the Ministry for Primary Industries and Department of Conservation, are collaborating on the development of a Pathway Management Plan under the Biosecurity Act (“Clean Hull Plan”). It was initially proposed that this plan would be adopted through aligned regional plans for each of the four councils, providing consistent rules across all four regions.
In the first half of 2021, staff from the councils and central government agencies tested proposed content with elected members, mana whenua and key stakeholders. Overall, there is strong support for the plan. However, a consistent theme in the feedback was a preference for a national plan rather than four aligned regional plans as this would provide the greatest level of protection.
The minister for biosecurity has indicated a willingness to adopt a single ‘national’ plan. This would provide more comprehensive management of marine pest spread among regions. It would also reduce the risk of inconsistencies arising among the regional plans (e.g., due to legal challenge to one or more regional plans). A national pathway plan is an instrument under the Biosecurity Act. Despite the name, ‘national’ pathway plans can be applied at smaller spatial scales but are adopted by central rather than local government.
The proposal is to initially adopt a national plan across the four ‘Top of the North’ regions, based on work to date in these regions. The plan would then be expanded to include the remainder of the country later, when other regions are ready to be brought on board. Leadership from northern regions has contributed to a growing appetite among other regions to get involved. Staff from Northland Regional Council and the other agencies will continue to collaborate on drafting the proposed plan, supporting Biosecurity Act documentation, and a multi-agency management agreement setting out roles and responsibilities for governance and implementation. Formal public consultation is expected in early- to mid-2022.
1. That the report ‘Clean Hull Plan - Update to a National Pathway Management Plan’ by Kathryn Lister, Biosecurity Manager Marine and dated 1 November 2021, be received.
2. That Council endorses staff to continue to develop the Clean Hull Plan as a National Pathway Management Plan under the Biosecurity Act 1993.
2.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Status quo – develop the Clean Hull Plan as four aligned Regional Marine Pathway Management Plans across the four northernmost regions. |
Statutory decision-making rests with the council. |
Greater risk of divergence among regions, for example due to legal challenge following plan adoption. More difficult to expand the plan to other regions in the future.
|
2 |
Develop the Clean Hull Plan as a National Marine Pathway Management Plan. |
The key benefits of implementing a national plan, as opposed to an inter-regional plan, for the four upper north island regions are 1) greater certainty of consistent rules across all regions; 2) greater investment from the crown; 3) it will be easier to expand the Plan to cover other regions in the future through a plan review; and 4) A national plan approach will be consistent with, and support, DOC’s roles for marine biodiversity protection. |
Statutory decision-making to adopt a national plan rests with the minister rather than councils. However, councils can still have decision-making input through a governance structure covering plan development and implementation. |
The staff’s recommendation is Option 2, which is to develop the Clean Hull Plan as a National Marine Pathway Management Plan.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
This decision to participate in the development of a national pathway plan will ensure Northland’s priorities and implementation issues are considered. Once in place it will increase the ability of the region to proactively protect the coastal environment from the negative impacts of non-indigenous marine pest species.
2. Community views
During the first half of 2021, agency staff tested draft content with elected members, mana whenua and key stakeholders, to inform further drafting. Overall, there was strong support for a consistent approach to managing biofouling risk across the Top of the North. Key feedback themes included:
· preference for stronger national leadership and a nationally consistent approach to managing biofouling, rather than just the upper north island
· support for a shared funding model, with contributions from vessel owners as well as regional and central government
· interest from mana whenua to be actively involved in implementing the plan
· lack of cleaning infrastructure was commonly raised as a key barrier to successful implementation
· concern that the proposed rules would be unworkable for large commercial vessels, with suggestions of alternative regulatory options to consider for this class of vessel
· interest in how risks from stationary vessels and domestic ballast could be managed
· requests that the plan exempts vessels that only visit and stay in the country for a short period of time
· concern relating to environmental and/or cultural impacts of anti-fouling products and the need to ensure these are not exacerbated by the plan.
3. Māori impact statement
Engagement with Māori to date has indicated high levels of support for shifting the approach of the plan from an inter-regional to a national approach. Māori across the four regions of the proposed management area have indicated they wanted to see stronger national leadership demonstrated and for there to be greater national consistency to the approach, systems, and governance for domestic marine biosecurity. The implementation of the plan has the potential for positive effects for all local people including Māori. The decision of council to endorse staff participation is likely to mean better outcomes for Northland Māori than could otherwise be the case.
4. Financial implications
The development of the Clean Hull Plan proposal is accounted for in council’s Long Term Plan.
5. Implementation issues
There are no implementation issues with respect to the development of the Clean Hull Plan proposal. Implementation of the plan, if adopted following public consultation, is not likely to be significantly different to current implementation of Northland’s Regional Marine Pathway Plan.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is provided for in council’s Long-Term Plan. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement. Engagement on previous steps in developing the pathway proposal has also indicated a preference for a national pathway plan and the process under the Biosecurity Act also allows for further public engagement on the actual content of the pathway plan proposal.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
A decision to prepare a proposal for a National Pathway Management Plan is consistent with policy and legislative requirements.
Background/Tuhinga
One of the highest risk “pathways” for marine pests spreading to new sites is hitchhiking on boat hulls in the form of biofouling. Once marine pests are established, they are very difficult to control. Therefore, prevention is better than cure, with effective management focussing on spread prevention and early detection. Because craft often move across regional boundaries, differing rules in each region limit management effectiveness.
In 2019, the “Top of the North” councils – Northland, Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty – consulted the public on a potential consistent approach to hull fouling rules under the Biosecurity Act, in the form of a consistent Regional Pathway Management Plan to be adopted by each of the four regions. Following positive public feedback, all four councils endorsed staff to collaborate on the development of such a plan.
Staff from the four regions, along with the Ministry for Primary Industries and Department of Conservation have begun drafting the proposed plan. This includes identifying potential rules and collating information for cost-benefit and cost allocation analyses as well as other documentation required under the Biosecurity Act. Staff from the respective agencies are in the early stages of negotiating a multi-agency agreement on funding (cost sharing), roles and responsibilities. It is proposed that implementation of the plan is partially funded from a charge to craft owners, in addition to funds from regional local government rates and central government.
A national approach to managing marine pest spread has always been the preferred approach of many councils, including Top of the North regions, because it would achieve more comprehensive management of inter-regional pest spread. The four northern regions have been collaborating on a plan for the Top of the North regions in the absence of a national approach. The leadership shown in this space by Top of the North regions has been instrumental in contributing to a growing appetite for marine pathway collaboration in central government and among other regional councils.
As well as providing more comprehensive pest management, a national plan approach is simpler, in that a single plan could be adopted by central government, rather than each region adopting an aligned plan. This reduces the risk of divergence among regions, for example due to legal challenge following plan adoption. It also makes it easier to expand to other regions in the future.
Following strong feedback in favour of a national approach, staff from the Ministry for Primary Industries briefed Minister for Biosecurity, Damien O’Connor in September 2021. The minister was supportive of developing a single national pathway management plan, instead of each council adopting an aligned regional pathway plan. The minister’s support is based on an assumption that regions will continue to be active partners, with roles in governance and funding. A national pathway plan is an instrument under the Biosecurity Act. Despite the name, ‘national’ pathway plans can be applied at smaller spatial scales but are adopted by central rather than local government. In the mid- to long-term, the intent is for the national plan to be truly national in scale, and engagement with other regions is already underway. However, as an interim step, it is proposed to consult on a national pathway plan that applies only to the Top of the North. This is to avoid delays in these regions while other regions are brought into the plan.
National pathway plans have similar process requirements under the Biosecurity Act, as compared with regional plans. Therefore, most of the work done to date can be carried across to a national plan. However, there are some differences, particularly:
· statutory decision-making to adopt a national plan, rests with the minister rather than councils. Councils can still have decision-making input through a governance structure covering plan development and implementation
· for a national plan, formal public consultation occurs first, then the minister adopts the plan, whereas for regional plans a proposed plan is adopted then consulted on, prior to adopting the final plan
· in the case of regional plans, each of the four regions would be the management agency for its own (aligned) regional plan. A national plan would have a single management agency. Options currently being explored include a dedicated team within the Ministry for Primary Industries, a standalone new departmental management agency with its own Chief Executive but located within the Ministry for Primary Industries, or establishment of a Schedule 4A Public Finance Act company
Next Steps
· Staff from the six agencies will continue to draft the proposed plan and supporting documentation required under the Biosecurity Act. A complete draft is expected to be ready for the minister by
· November 2021. Once the proposed plan has been fully drafted, implementation cost estimates can be finalised. At that stage, councils will be in a position to understand whether the proposed approach is affordable within current budgets, or whether there is a case to consider additional funding from council rates.
· Agency staff will also continue drafting a multi-agency management agreement to set out roles and responsibilities among the agencies. It is anticipated that this will be brought to Chief Executives to sign in June 2022, aligned to the proposed plan being taken to the Minister for adoption.
· Due to the change to a national plan, formal public consultation is now expected to occur in early- to mid-2022, instead of late 2021. Elected members will have an opportunity to provide formal feedback at this stage, alongside public consultation.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 7.3
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Hundertwasser Art Centre: Revoking a condition of funding to appoint a council representative to the governance group |
From: |
Darryl Jones, Economist and Emmanouela Galanou, Economic Policy Advisor |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Auriole Ruka, Pou Manawhakahaere - GM Governance and Engagement, on 03 November 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The purpose of this report is to seek council’s agreement to revoke one of the five conditions of funding associated with council’s decision on 21 February 2017 to provide $1.5M (excluding GST) from its Investment and Growth Reserve (IGR) to support the Hundertwasser Art Centre (HAC) in Whangārei. The condition to be revoked is (v), which requires the funding agreement to contain a clause which allows the appointment of a Northland Regional Council representative to the independent board operating the HAC. This condition was linked, through negotiation, to council’s third tranche payment of $300,000 (excluding GST) due at the project milestone of practical completion. Practical completion occurred on 22 October 2021.
The purpose of including condition (v) was to provide council with a degree of influence over how profits from the operation of the HAC were distributed to ensure that the public benefited. Since making the decision in 2017, the environment in which both the HAC and council are operating has changed substantially. Covid-19 and the resulting travel restrictions will provide a significant challenge to HAC when it opens in December 2021. The issue of distributing profits is unlikely to be a major concern for the governance board in the short to medium term. Likewise, council must deal with several vital issues over the next few years such as climate change, local government reform and freshwater management. It is important that council’s time and effort be focussed on these. Council has not included a similar condition on any other project investment allocation it has made from the IGR. Consequently, staff are recommending that condition (v) be revoked.
1. That the report ‘Hundertwasser Art Centre: Revoking a condition of funding to appoint a council representative to the governance group’ by Darryl Jones, Economist and Emmanouela Galanou, Economic Policy Advisor and dated 2 November 2021, be received.
2. That condition (v), relating to the appointment of a Northland Regional Council representative to the independent board operating the Hundertwasser Art Centre (HAC), associated with the decision to provide up to $1.5 million (excl GST) in funding for the HAC made at the council meeting on 21 February 2017, is revoked.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Agree to the revoke condition (v) that council appoint a representative to the independent board operating the HAC. |
Free staff from the need to undertake a process of selecting and appointing a representative. |
Removes council from any influence over the operation of the HAC including distribution of profit. |
2 |
Maintain condition (v). |
Maintains council’s limited influence over the operation of the HAC. |
Staff resources required to select and appoint a representative. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
There are no environmental risks or impacts that need to be considered in relation to the decision to revoke condition (v).
2. Community views
There are no known community views that need to be considered in relation to the decision to revoke condition (v).
3. Māori impact statement
There are no known impacts on Māori which are different from the public that need to be considered in relation to the decision to revoke condition (v). The HAC building will house the Wairau Māori Art Gallery, for which a separate board has already been established.
4. Financial implications
There are no financial implications associated with the decision to revoke condition (v) as the funding commitment for the HAC is already budgeted for in the IGR as part of the Long Term Plan 2021-2031.
5. Implementation issues
If council revokes condition (v), there are no implementation issues. If condition (v) is maintained, council staff will be required to undertake a process to select and appoint an appropriate representative.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, the decision to revoke condition (v) is of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy as they are part of council’s day-to-day activities.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The policy or legislative requirements that is relevant to this decision concern section 24.6 of council’s Standing Orders which sets out the process for revocation or alteration of a resolution passed by a previous meeting. This process has been met by this paper. The decision to revoke condition (v) does not change the risk profile of the project.
Background/Tuhinga
Nil
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 7.4
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Draft NRC submission - Emissions reduction discussion document |
From: |
Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Victoria Harwood, Pou Tiaki Hapori - GM Community Resilience and Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services, on 05 November 2021 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The Government has released a discussion document on measures to reduce Aotearoa NZ’s greenhouse gas emissions. The discussion document is an early step in developing the first emissions reduction plan (ERP) under the Climate Change Response Act 2002. The ERP will set the direction for reducing emissions over the next 15 years and set a pathway to meeting the 2050 net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and biogenic methane targets. It is due to be released in May 2022.
The discussion document sets out high level principles, proposals for ‘system change’ and specific measures for sectors, including: transport, energy, waste and f-gases, building and construction, agriculture and forestry.
A draft submission is Attached for consideration by council. Submissions close 24 November 2021.
1. That the report ‘Draft NRC submission - Emissions reduction discussion document’ by Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and dated 3 November 2021, be received.
2. That feedback on the draft submission from non-elected TTMAC members be considered in further development of the draft submission.
3. That council approves the submission to be lodged with the Ministry for the Environment.
4. That the Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services be authorised to make any minor amendments for the purposes of readability or grammar prior to it being lodged.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Council does not lodge a submission on the discussion document |
No further staff time / resource required. |
The government does not have access to Council views on emissions reduction proposals. Council is perceived to have little interest in the matter and is not representing Northland on emissions reduction. |
2 |
Council lodges a submission on the discussion document and considers feedback from non-elected TTMAC members. |
The government has access to Council views on emissions reduction proposals. Council is seen to have an active interest in the matter and to be representing Northland on emissions reduction. |
Minor staff time and resource required. |
The staff’s recommended option is 2
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
There are no environmental impacts associated with the decision to lodge a submission.
2. Community views
Reducing climate change emissions is important to a wide range of communities and individuals in Northland – views on emission reduction are also likely to vary widely. However, council does not need to consult with the community, sectors or public generally before deciding on whether or not to lodge a submission, or to seek views on the content of a submission.
3. Māori impact statement
Reducing climate change emissions is known to be important to Māori and how the government proposes to reduce emissions will likely have an impact on Māori. Background material and a working draft of the council submission have been provided to TTMAC non-elected members as a means to consider their views on the government’s emissions reduction in the council submission. However, the council submission does not directly affect Māori and council does not need to consult further on whether or not to lodge a submission on the matter.
4. Financial implications
There are no financial implications associated with this decision and the activity is provided for in the LTP.
5. Implementation issues
There are no implementation issues associated with the decision to lodge a submission.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it has been provided for in council’s Long-Term Plan and is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
There are no significant policy, risk or compliance issues associated with this decision.
Background/Tuhinga
The Government has released a discussion document on measures to reduce Aotearoa NZ’s greenhouse gas emissions. The discussion document is an early step in developing the first emissions reduction plan (ERP) under the Climate Change Response Act 2002. The ERP will set the direction for reducing emissions over the next 15 years and set a pathway to meeting the 2050 net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and biogenic methane targets. It is due to be released in May 2022. Notably, the discussion document identifies a gap between current estimates of policy impacts and emissions reductions required to meet first emissions budget – this shortfall is between 2.1 and 5.1 MtCO2e depending on the level of policy ‘impact’.
The discussion document sets out high level principles, proposals for ‘system change’ and specific measures for sectors, including: transport, energy, waste and f-gases, building and construction, agriculture and forestry. At this stage the cost-effectiveness of many of the proposals has yet to be confirmed and feedback is sought on other methods that could be applied, particularly in the private sector. Much of the focus in the discussion document is on:
· Guiding principles including: A fair and equitable transition to a low-carbon economy, using an evidence based approach, recognising co-benefits of mitigation, upholding Te Tiriti, and setting a clear, ambitious and affordable pathway
· Aligning systems and tools including: government accountability and coordination, funding and financing, emissions pricing, the planning system, research / science and innovation, behaviour change and moving to a circular / bioeconomy
Sector specific proposals cover transport, energy, waste and f-gases, building and construction, agriculture and forestry. Most of the focus in these sections is on transport, energy and industry, building and construction and waste. There are fewer measures proposed for agriculture and forestry – much of the effort relating to agriculture is occurring through He Waka Eke Noa Primary Sector Climate Action Partnership with the intent to establish farm level emissions accounting and pricing by 2025.
Key proposals across these sectors include:
· Transport - targets for reducing light vehicle travel (20% by 2035) and from freight (by 25% by 2035) and increasing zero emission vehicles (30% of light fleet by 2035)
· Integrating urban development and transport planning and increasing mode-shift/choice
· Improving public transport reach and frequency
· Enabling congestion pricing
· Emission standards for imported vehicles
· Developing a freight and supply chain strategy and EV infrastructure plan
· Reducing maritime emissions
· Introducing a biofuels mandate.
Energy and industry
· Developing an energy strategy and renewable energy target
· Developing a plan to decarbonise industry
· Supporting alternative fuels and energy (such as biofuels, renewables and hydrogen)
· Updating the energy efficiency product regulation system
Building and construction
· Capping emissions from buildings and setting a date for phase-out of fossil gas infrastructure in buildings
· Investigating mandatory energy performance for commercial and public buildings
· Investigating emission reductions through design, planning, construction and demolition of buildings.
Waste
· Reducing organic and construction waste disposal to landfill
· Gas capture at landfills
· Product stewardship programmes.
F-gases
· Phasing down hydrofluorocarbons
· Regulating the import of high emissions refrigerants
Agriculture (much of the effort is deferred to the He Waka Eke Noa Partnership)
· Accelerating mitigations through research and development
· Improving extension, support and advice.
Forestry (many of the forestry proposals are linked to emissions pricing under the Emissions Trading Scheme)
· Reviewing the role of forestry in the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
· Greater incentives for native carbon sequestration
· Potentially limiting access to the ETS for some sectors.
Many of the measures are interrelated and complimentary (such as waste, circular economy and building and construction and forestry and the ETS). The discussion document is available on the Ministry for the Environment website: https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/Emissions-reduction-plan-discussion-document.pdf
The draft submission attached supports many of the proposals in the discussion document. Key points in the draft submission include:
· A priority on reducing emissions rather than offsetting – offsetting capacity is probably better ‘rationed’ and reserved in case emissions prove harder to reduce than thought
· Limiting access to the ETS for non-forestry participants (to encourage reductions rather than offsets) but better enabling participation for hard to abate sectors (such as agriculture)
· Better targeting of ETS incentives to non-productive land and use of permanent forests (preferably permanent native) on highly erodible land
· Greater incentives for native carbon removals and rewarding more emission reduction options in the ETS (such as control of browsing pests, wetlands and ‘blue carbon’) given the co-benefits for water quality and biodiversity
· Supporting diversification and emissions reduction in the agricultural sector (through advice, trials, exemplars and funding)
· Support for a circular / bioeconomy noting the unique opportunities in Northland (including the repurposing of the Marsden Refinery and the wood waste resource for biofuels)
· Support for reducing emissions and funding innovation (such as wind assist) in the maritime transport sector (again noting Northland’s existing maritime industry as an opportunity)
· Support for renewables and biofuel development – noting the Northland opportunity for this (especially wind, solar and biofuels)
· Adding more value to the timber resource prior to export (especially given the vulnerability of our exports to emissions pricing under other jurisdictions).
A major theme in the draft submission is ensuring measures provide for an equitable and just transition to a low carbon economy - Northland is particularly exposed to many emissions reduction measures (especially pricing) given a high reliance on agriculture and manufacturing (which contribute about 80% of Northland’s emissions), a dispersed rural population with relatively high deprivation in many areas, limited options for public transport and comparatively high emissions by regional productivity – so a just transition is especially important for our region and its people. That said, the submission identifies opportunities in Northland that will assist in the transition to a low-carbon economy and that can be realised with government support.
Feedback from council on the draft submission would be appreciated. Input from non-elected TTMAC members on the draft submission has also been sought following endorsement of a collaborative approach to the development of submissions on key government proposals such as climate change. Comments received from TTMAC non-elected members will be circulated to councillors prior to the meeting for consideration.
It is recommended that the draft submission be approved by council subject to any amendments as directed. Submissions close on 24 November 2021.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Draft NRC submission - Emissions reduction document ⇩
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Health and safety report |
From: |
Kelcie Mills, Health and Safety Advisor |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 03 November 2021 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
This report is to inform the council of the activity in health and safety for the month of August 2021. An overview/summary of the activities include:
· A large portion of the health and safety programme has been put on hold to focus on the COVID-19 response. This includes undertaking consultation and risk assessments for roles and working through the changes in vaccination requirements for the education sector.
· There was a decrease in both incident and hazard related events in October.
· The health and safety committee has been re-elected to reflect the structure changes and growth in the organisation.
· Trainings that took place were outdoor first aid, and health and safety inductions training.
· The drug and alcohol policy was reviewed.
That the report ‘Health and safety report’ by Kelcie Mills, Health and Safety Advisor and dated 28 October 2021, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
1. Health and safety performance
Table 1: Health and safety performance lead and lag indicators
*Based on calendar year
Table 1 outlines the key lead and lag indicators in health and safety.
The health and safety work programme has been largely put on hold to focus on the COVID-19 response. All the BAU activities (inductions, trainings, health and safety incidents and health monitoring) continue but the audit programme activities are being delayed.
The induction rates have dropped as there were eight new staff in October and five of those were in the last few days of the month. As such, the paperwork hasn’t been returned as of 31st October 2021.
2. Risk management
The top risks are:
1. Dealing with aggressive people – psychological harm
1. COVID-19 pandemic
3. Extended workload/stress
4. Workplace bullying and harassment Note: This due to potential risk, not high numbers
5. Working with contractors
6. Driving motor vehicles – accident and injury related
7. Slips, trips, and falls
8. Sedentary work – ergonomic harm
9. Working under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol
Note: The COVID-19 risk score has increased and moved into 1st equal. The top risks are identified by the residual risk scores. There risks are the highest after all controls have been put in place.
Risk Updates
The COVID-19 risk profile is changing every day and it is consuming the majority of time in the health and safety area at the moment. The key areas of focus are:
· With the new government mandate for the education sector to receive vaccinations, we are scoping who fits into this category and seeking their vaccination status.
· We are consulting with health and safety representatives, managers and individual workers about their role and what risk is involved regarding potential transmission of the virus.
· We are undertaking risk assessments based on various scenarios and role types to identify what further controls we need to evolve with the changes at each alert level and the growing cases in the community.
· We have begun scoping the new ‘traffic light’ protection framework and how we will revise all pandemic protocols and supplementary procedures.
· We continue to advocate for vaccinations and flexible working arrangements for staff.
3. Injuries, incidents, and hazards
Figure 1: Number of hazard and injury related events for previous 12 months
Figure 1 shows a decrease in both incident and hazard related events in October. As there has been a decrease in events, the November health and safety spotlight will encourage reporting.
Events reported
Figure 2: Top event types for previous 12 months
Events of interest
Note: the events of interest only detail high risk events, or events which affect large groups of people.
· A worker rolled their ankle walking through long grass after a full day in the field. The pain subsided within a few minutes keeping it rested. However, it did raise the need to check the first aid kits were stocked with supplies to treat rolled ankles, as well as include into the teams’ pre-start checks to be cautious of the end of day injuries especially when you can’t see your footing in grass.
· Two speeding events occurred; in both instances the drivers were going just over 120km/h in a 100km speed limit area. It was both drivers first speeding event. They were spoken to by their managers, and it was identified that they were on passing lanes. They were told to watch their speeding, nonetheless.
4. Health and safety strategy work programme
Leadership
· The health and safety committee has been re-elected to reflect the changes in the organisation. It is now nine members (one from each group) and three general roles.
Communication and engagement
· Communication to the business has focused on COVID-19, such as advocating for vaccinations.
Wellbeing
· The wellbeing committee has a book library full of recommended books for staff to borrow.
· The wellbeing committee ran a lolly jar competition to have a light-hearted activity.
Learning and development
· Trainings that took place in October: Outdoor first aid, health and safety inductions training.
Continual improvement
· The drug and alcohol policy was reviewed in October.
5. Legislative changes
The government have released a mandate for the schooling education sector to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by 1 January 2022.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 8.2
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Chair's Report to Council |
From: |
Penny Smart, Chair |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Penny Smart, Chair, on 10 November 2021 |
Purpose of Report
This report is to receive information from the Chair on strategic issues, meetings/events attended, and correspondence sent for the month of October 2021.
That the report ‘Chair's Report to Council’ by Penny Smart, Chair and dated 5 November 2021, be received.
Meetings/events attended
During this period, I attended the following meetings/events/functions:
· Meetings attended with the council’s CEO, Malcolm Nicholson
o Office of the Auditor General relationship meeting
o Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) Three Waters update - Mayors, Chairs and Chief Executives
· Regular half yearly meeting with government members of Parliament representing Northland
· Regular Mayors and Chair catchup meetings
· Meeting with Te Arawhiti and Northland Mayors
· Meeting with Marsden Maritime Holdings
· Regular LGNZ Three Waters meeting
· Regular Mayors meetings with Eru Lyndon, MSD
· Regional Sector Group representative on the New Zealand Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Research Centre – Agriculture Stakeholder Group
· Kaipara Moana Remediaiton Joint Committee
· Tai Tokerau Vaccination Roll Out Round Up meeting
· Joint Councils Kaipara Moana Working Party
· Webinars for elected members:
o Three waters: the changing face of water regulation
o Virtual roadshow of the Australian water story.
Correspondence
During October I sent out the following correspondence:
Date |
Addressed To |
Subject |
11.10.2021 |
Mayor John Carter, Far North District Council |
Wild dog issue in the Far North |
22.10.2021 |
Government Members of Parliament for Northland |
NRC's position on Proposed Four Waters Entities for Te Taitokerau |
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 8.3
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Chief Executive’s Report to Council |
From: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer, on 10 November 2021 |
That the report ‘Chief Executive’s Report to Council’ by Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer and dated 31 October 2021, be received.
8.3.1 Highlights
New appointments – Group Managers and Deputy Group Managers
I am privileged to confirm appointment of three new Group Managers and all the Deputy Group Managers as follows:
· Auriole Ruka – Pou Manawhakahaere – Group Manager Governance and Engagement
· Victoria Harwood – Poutiaki Hapori – Group Manager Community Resilience
· Don Mackenzie – Poutiaki Pūtaiao – Group Manager Biosecurity
· Cathy Erstich – Deputy Group Manager Governance and Engagement
· Carol Cottam – Deputy Group Manager Corporate Services
· Tess Dacre – Deputy Group Manager Regulatory Services
· Ben Lee – Deputy Group Manager Environmental Services
· Jim Lyle – Deputy Group Manager Community Resilience
· Kathryn Lister – Deputy Group Manager Biosecurity
Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee
Justine Daw has been appointed the role of Pou Tātaki to lead the Kaipara Moana restoration programme. Justine officially takes up her role on 6 December 2021.
Kaipara Uri representative Willie Wright has stood down from his role on the Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee (Joint Committee). Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust have put forward Georgina Connelly as a replacement member for the Joint Committee. Under the Joint Committee’s Terms of Reference, membership comprises six from Kaipara Uri entities, three elected members from Auckland Council, and three elected members from the Northland Regional Council. Georgina Connelly is a trustee of Te Uri o Hau Settlement Trust and was previously involved in the development of the Kaipara Moana Remediation Indicative Business Case which was provided to ministers in 2019.
8.3.2 REGULATORY SERVICES
During October 2021, a total of 70 Decisions were issued. These decisions comprised:
Coastal Permits |
3 |
|
Land Use Consents |
27 |
Land Discharge Permits |
19 |
|
Water Permits |
12 |
Water Discharge Permits |
1 |
|
Bore Consents |
8 |
The processing timeframes for the October 2021 consents ranged from:
82 to 2 calendar days, with the median time being 33 days;
53 to 2 working days, with the median time being 22 days.
Thirty-eight applications were received in October 2021.
Of the 91 applications in progress at the end of October 2021:
Twenty-six were received more than 12 months ago, with the following reasons:
Awaiting additional information (including CIAs) |
12 |
Consultation with affected parties/stakeholders |
4 |
On-hold pending new rules becoming operative |
5 |
Other |
5 |
Seven were received between 6 and 12 months ago (most awaiting further information from the applicant);
Fifty-eight less than 6 months ago.
Appointment of Hearing Commissioners
No commissioners were appointed in October 2021.
Consents Decisions and Progress on Notified Applications in Process, Objections and Appeals
The current level of notified application
processing activities at the end of October 2021 is
(by number):
Applications Publicly / Limited Notified During Previous Month |
0 |
Progress on Applications Previously Notified |
2 |
Hearings and Decisions |
0 |
Appeals/Objections |
2 |
COMPLIANCE MONITORING
The results of compliance monitoring for the period 1 - 31 October 2021 (and year-to-date figures) are summarised in the following table and discussed below.
Classification |
Total |
Full compliance |
Low risk non-compliance |
Moderate non-compliance |
Significant non-compliance |
Not exercised during period |
Air Discharge |
15 |
14 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Bore Consent |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Coastal Discharge |
8 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Coastal Permit |
8 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FDE – Discharge Permit |
94 |
73 |
0 |
16 |
1 |
4 |
FDE – Permitted Activity |
23 |
15 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
Land Discharge |
57 |
40 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
Land Use Consent |
28 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Water Discharge |
49 |
41 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
Water Permit |
26 |
25 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Water Take |
60 |
46 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
Total |
369 |
295 |
24 |
32 |
4 |
14 |
Percentage |
|
79.9% |
6.5% |
8.7% |
1.1% |
3.8% |
Year to date |
1,920 |
1,421 |
246 |
145 |
30 |
78 |
Percentage |
|
74.0% |
12.8% |
7.6% |
1.6% |
4.1% |
Coastal
The majority of consents monitored during the reporting period related to coastal discharges (municipal sewage and industrial).
Some self-monitoring observations were undertaken but the Level 3 restrictions affected a number of consents monitored. Annual invoicing for coastal consents was completed, resulting in many queries fielded by monitoring staff following the revision of these charges in the 2021-22 Charging Policy.
Farm Dairy Effluent (FDE) Monitoring
FDE inspections commenced on 21 July 2021. NRC staff and the FDE contractor will be visiting a total of 783 farms this monitoring season (5 less than last year). To date approximately 61% of farms have been visited and reported on. This is 241 less farms than this time last year due to inspections being halted during COVID-19 lockdowns. Comparisons of this season’s results so far with those for last season are given in the tables below.
Consented Farms (592 to do)
Full Compliance |
Moderate Non-Compliance |
Significant Non-Compliance |
|||
This Year |
Last Year |
This Year |
Last Year |
This Year |
Last Year |
287 |
358 |
60 |
127 |
9 |
57 |
81% |
66% |
17% |
23% |
2% |
11% |
Non-Consented Farms (191 to do)
Full Compliance |
Moderate Non-Compliance |
Significant Non-Compliance |
|||
This Year |
Last Year |
This Year |
Last Year |
This Year |
Last Year |
94 |
129 |
21 |
28 |
6 |
19 |
78% |
73% |
17% |
16% |
5% |
11% |
There has been a considerable decrease in the number of farms graded as significantly non-compliant. This is partly attributed to the fact that in previous years significant non-compliances with silage leachate or dead stock rules were included in the FDE monitoring statistics. From this season onwards, the statistics will only cover farm dairy (cowshed) effluent compliance to ensure that we are fully aligned with regional sector reporting protocols.
Water, Waste, Air and Land Use (WWALU) Compliance Monitoring
Contaminated Land Management
· Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants
WWTP/Consent Status |
Issues (October 2021) |
Enforcement Action/Response |
Far North District |
||
Ahipara Expires 2033 |
Ongoing non-compliance with bacteriological consent limits |
Under AN; FNDC investigating land disposal options |
Hihi Expires 2022 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Kaeo Expires 2022 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Kaikohe Expires 30 November 2021 |
Intermittent non-compliances with ADW flow, ammonia & bacteriological consent limits. System overdue for de-sludging |
None currently
|
Kaitāia Expires 30 November 2021 |
No recent issues |
Under AN (reticulation overflows) Issues will be addressed in replacement consent |
Kawakawa Expires 2036 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Kerikeri Expires 2036 |
No obvious issues from new plant (commissioned in December 2020)
|
Under AN – cancellation currently being considered |
Kohukohu Expired 2016 |
Occasional issues with bacteriological conditions of consent |
None currently |
Opononi & Omāpere Expired 2019 |
Non-compliances with bacteriological consent limits Desludging overdue |
Under AN Issues will be addressed in replacement consent; desludging to be undertaken |
Paihia Expires 2034 |
Plant upgraded 2019; alkalinity issues preventing optimal ammonia treatment |
None currently Alkalinity improvement project still in progress |
Rangiputa Expires 2032 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Rāwene Expires 2023 |
Risk of non-compliance if ponds are not desludged soon |
None currently |
Russell Expires 2024 |
Occasional non-compliances with E. coli consent limit post UV |
Under AN |
Taipā Expires 2029 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Whatuwhiwhi Expires 2025 |
Elevated TSS levels (consent limit may be unnecessarily restrictive) |
FNDC to seek consent variation to address TSS levels
|
Whangarei District |
||
Hikurangi Expires 2025 |
Intermittent issues with plant performance |
None currently Plant performance being reviewed to identify improvements |
Ngunguru Expires 2035 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Oakura Expires 2025 |
Occasional spikes in E. coli |
None currently |
Portland Expires 2024 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Ruakaka Expires 2046 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Tutukaka Expires 2024 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Waiōtira Expires 2030 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Waipū Expires 2030 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Whāngārei City Expires 2022 |
Occasional odour complaints |
None currently |
Kaipara District |
||
Dargaville Expires 2022 |
Non-compliances with WQ discharge volume consent limits |
Pond desludged in 2020 to mitigate water quality issues |
Glinks Gully Expires 2024 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Kaiwaka Expires 2022 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Mangawhai Expires 2042 |
Odour complaints and occasional exceedances of TDS consent limit |
None currently |
Maungaturoto Expires 2032 |
Intermittent non-compliances, generally due to high rainfall |
Under AN |
Te Kopuru Expires 2044 |
Intermittent minor non-compliances |
Second aerator installed 2020 |
Environmental Incidents
There were no environmental incidents reported in October which resulted in a significant environmental impact.
ENFORCEMENT
Abatement Notices, Infringement Notices and Formal Warnings
The following enforcement actions were taken during the period:
Action Type |
Number |
Abatement Notice (AN) |
26 |
Infringement Notice (IN) |
12 |
Other Enforcement
Earthworks without erosion and sediment controls – Tōtara North
Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 20 July 2020 against an individual for earthworks undertaken without controls, and work within a watercourse and the riparian management zone. The defendant has pleaded not guilty. A hearing was scheduled for 22-24 June 2021 which did not proceed due to the defendant being ill. A new hearing date of 17-18 January 2022 has been set down.
Open burning on industrial/trade property – Whangārei
Charges were laid in the Whangārei District Court on 27 November 2020 against an individual for open burning on industrial/trade premises; the burnt items also included prohibited items. There are two charges against the individual who pleaded not guilty on 30 April 2021. A case review hearing was completed on 22 June 2021. A hearing date was scheduled for 4 November 2021 but the Court is in the process of scheduling a new date in 2022.
Farm dairy effluent – Parapara
Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 6 May 2021 against a farm owner for offences which occurred in August 2020. There are four charges against the farm owner. The first court appearance was set down for 9 July 2021, which was adjourned until 25 August 2021 to allow the defence lawyer to consider the disclosure documentation. A new hearing date has been scheduled for 17 November 2021.
8.3.3 CEO’s Office
Current Legal Proceedings
Department |
Description |
Status |
Consent decision appeal |
Two separate consent applications for replacement and new consents relating to a proposed expansion of, Doug’s Ōpua Boat Yard in Walls Bay, Ōpua |
No further update. |
Consent decision appeal |
Irrigation of avocado orchards and horticulture crops. |
Environment Court has set down a two-week hearing commencing 2 May 2022. The Court has also directed Court assisted mediation/expert conferencing as required to occur, if possible, prior to Christmas 2021. |
8.3.4 BIOSECURITY
INCURSIONS AND RESPONSE
Indian Ringneck Parakeet A resident of Whangārei Heads posted a photo of a blue Indian Ring-necked parakeet on the local Pārua Bay/Whangārei Heads Community Facebook Page. Indian ring-necked parakeets are an exclusion pest in Northland and threaten our native birds and bats by competing for food and nesting place as well as introducing diseases. They are also well-known agricultural pests of cereal and fruit crops. Whangārei Heads native biodiversity includes native parrots that are at risk of being displaced by Indian ring-necked parakeets should these birds become established in the wild. Staff are investigating to try and determine where the bird came from, and it is considered a likely escaped pet. Indian ring-neck parakeet seen in McLeod’s Bay |
|
WILD ANIMAL CONTROL
Mangonui River Feral Deer
Staff are meeting with landowners adjacent to the Mangonui River to plan the eradication and seek agreement to cross their land. There are a total of 16 properties that staff are targeting for surveillance and the deer are very mobile and it has been difficult to confirm their location.
Proposed Sika Eradication Russell Forest
Sika deer will be targeted for eradication later in the year. The eradication will take place in three stages:
1. Goat cull across sika eradication area to ensure goat pellets are minimised during Sika DNA survey, and also knock down high density goat numbers to reduce browsing damage and risk of spreading Phytophthora agathidicida. Concurrently staff propose funding the training of local kaimahi in wild animal control, for sustained control of goats into the future.
2. Sika DNA survey to quantify sika deer population in the Russell Forest.
3. Sika cull.
Before commencing, council requires landowner permissions to conduct the work on private property. Staff are working with local hapū representatives to carry out this engagement stage, and as soon as COVID-19 restriction allow will host two hui around Russell Forest to engage landowners.
Delegation of Wild Animal Control Act Powers
I continue to engage with the Department of Conservation. Staff have encountered at least five instances over the year where landowners have refused access for the purposes of wild animal control. If staff cannot access properties where deer are present, eradication will be an unrealistic goal.
KAURI PROTECTION
New Kauri Protection Funding
An agreement has been signed with the Ministry for Primary Industries for $1M of new funding for the coming year to kick start the national kauri protection plan. This funding will help pay for soil sampling, fencing, track building and wild animal management on private land. Staff will be working closely with iwi, the Ministry for Primary Industries, and the Department of Conservation (who have also received funding as part of the national plan initiatives) as part of this exciting new initiative to safeguard kauri for Northland.
”Clean Card” Kauri Protection Workshops
The kauri protection team presented a workshop to Pōkai o Ngāti Manu at Matauri Bay during the month. Recent COVID-19 alert level changes have resulted in several workshops planned for October being rescheduled to November.
Kaitiaki Kauri Project
The team also met with members from the Kaitiaki Kauri project. Kaitiaki Kauri is a two year project that has been established by Te Rūnanga-ā-Iwi-ō-Ngāpuhi and the Department of Conservation to protect kauri throughout Te Pēwhairangi area.
partnerships
Tutukaka High Value Area
Predator control: Trapping is continuing under COVID-19 restrictions with moderately high catches of feral cats and stoats. The rat catch is 60% above the long term average and possum catches are steady. Weed control: The first weed action event of the year was held in Shoebridge Reserve targeting tree and Chinese privet, cotoneaster, jasmine, and wild ginger. Eight volunteers attending including one new member. Species enhancement: Monitored kiwi are all doing well, and Marohi hatching a chick during the month. |
Weed action volunteers at Shoebridge Reserve |
Advocacy: Ngunguru School interns accompanied a Landcare trapper on fieldwork to Kukutauwhao Island to rebait traps and help with data entry for the rat baiting on the island. An AT220 autotrap was also installed on the island, which has since caught an adult possum and joey. No possums had been caught on the island since May 2020, and it had been hoped that possums might have been eradicated. The auto trap will assist the eradication goal.
Kiwi Coast – Northland Regional Council
Kiwi chicks: Spring heralds the arrival of hatching kiwi chicks on the Kiwi Coast and Kiwi Coast professional trappers have increased trap servicing to fortnightly to assist kiwi chick survival rates. Media release: Kiwi Coast’s October media release regarding the highest kiwi call recorded in history appeared in the New Zealand Herald and Northern Advocate. Engaging Northlanders in successful kiwi recovery and advocating for improved dog control continue to be a key focus of Kiwi Coast. The press release can be found here: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/news/northland-boasts-highest-number-of-kiwi-calls/E3DATPWSJPTTNVN2JU53ZARULM/ |
Ellis, the newest chick in the |
|
Pest control workshops: Despite COVID-19 restrictions two local pest control workshops were able to be held during the month at Campbell Road Landcare and Pest Free Mangapai. |
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell Road Landcare trapping workshop |
Pest Free Mangapai trapping workshop |
|
Kiwi Link High Value Area
The Kiwi Link High Value Area budget and document have now been finalised and prepared for print so it can be used as an information and engagement resource at future Kiwi Link events and workshops.
The Kiwi Coast Trust worked with core Kiwi Link professional predator trappers during the COVID-19 Level 3 and 4 restrictions to update health and safety processes and standard operating procedures to identify low risk predator traps that could continue to be serviced, with agreement from council and the private landowners involved. It was pleasing to be able to continue predator control as an essential service during peak kiwi nesting time as the first kiwi chicks are now emerging from their nests.
Kiwi Link has received Agreement in Principle from the Department of Conservation’s Kiwi Recovery Group to progress kiwi releases into several identified sites within the high value area and carry out telemetry monitoring to provide information on the efficacy of ferret control, dog control and investigate kiwi dispersal. The Department have invited Kiwi Link to prepare a full proposal for the required Translocation Permit which if successful, may see implementation occur in 2023.
MARINE BIOSECURITY
Envirolink Application Success – level of fouling tools
Council has been successful in receiving a large Envirolink grant ($80,000) in the most recent round of funding which will support the completion of a larger $200,000 project. This collaborative project will create tools to consistently assess level of fouling scores on vessels. This is a joint agency project being developed by the ‘Top of the North’ regional councils alongside Biosecurity New Zealand and the Department of Conservation. As part of the project, training and workshops will be held to demonstrate the use of guidance resources, standardised protocols, and an app (developed as part of the project). These outputs will enable vital knowledge transfer and provide the tools needed for better biosecurity management with improved levels of confidence, for both vessel operators and regulatory agencies.
Ōpua Mediterrean Fanworm Response
Adverse weather conditions and COVID-19 lockdowns have resulted in a small pause to the diving operations that are part of the Ōpua fanworm response. Fortunately, literature suggests that we are currently in a period where fanworm are presently not reproductively active. This coupled with the extensive systematic search and destroy efforts that were completed in late winter leave staff confident that the current delays will have minimal impacts on the success of this programme. Encouragingly, results from NIWAs marine high risk site surveillance dive surveys conducted over 2 weeks this month in Ōpua Basin, detected and removed only 65 fanworm. This represents a significantly lower detection rate than NIWAs previous searches.
Whangaroa A contract has been agreed for divers to conduct a delimitation survey after two Sabella were found and removed from the oyster farm in Whangaroa. COVID-19 levels and bad weather are hampering the start date. Patuharekeke Hull Surveillance A successful trial using a pole camera for the surveillance of recently arrived vessels at Marsden Cove marina was conducted in difficult conditions with positive results. A few adjustments will be made, and inspections are expected to start next month.
Patuharakeke kaitiaki test a pole camera |
|
PEST PLANTS Sustained Control Pest Plants Ongoing COVID-19 restrictions once again limited performance of core pest plant management ground- work. Consequently, planning of pest plant programmes site works was prioritised for when field work could resume. Five sustained control incident requests were received and prepared for rule breach follow up. Eradication Plants Yellow flag iris sites were inspected with eight management sites completed. Pleasing three sites no regrowth present. |
|
Eradication plant yellow flag iris nestled amongst green goddess arum on Taipuhu Station Road |
8.3.5 COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
REGIONAL TRANSPORT PLANNING
Regional Public Transport Plan 2021-2031
At the 13 October 2021 Regional Transport Committee (RTC) a paper titled Draft Regional Public Transport Plan 2021-2031 was tabled with the following recommendations made:
1. THAT the Regional Transport Committee approve that the Chairman be delegated responsibility to approve formatting, minor wording and grammatical changes to the Draft Regional Public Transport Plan 2021/2031, whilst ensuring that these changes in no way alter the strategic direction or objectives of the Regional Public Transport Plan 2021/2031 as approved by the Regional Transport Committee at their meeting on 14 April 2021.
2. THAT the Regional Transport Committee approve the release of the Regional Public Transport Plan 2021-2031 to the Northland Regional Council for their endorsement and approval for public release.
The above recommendations were carried.
Staff are in the final stages of completing the Regional Public Transport Plan 2021-2031 for presentation to the Chairman of the RTC for his perusal and approval prior to submitting the document to the Northland Regional Council for approval for release. It is anticipated that this will be at the 14 December 2021 council meeting.
PASSENGER TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATION
*BusLink figures are reported one month in arrears, due to the required
information being unavailable at the time of the agenda deadline.
Bus Link stats for Sept 2021 (revenue ex GST) |
Actual |
Budget |
Variance |
Year/Date Actual |
Year/Date Budgeted |
Variance |
CityLink Passengers |
23,124 |
27,573 |
-4,449 |
68,390 |
83,318 |
- 14,928 |
CityLink Revenue |
$28,249 |
$35,569 |
-$7,320 |
$87,476 |
$107,479 |
-$20,003 |
Mid North Link Passengers |
122 |
156 |
-34 |
472 |
480 |
-8 |
Mid North Link Revenue |
$ 466 |
$840 |
-$374 |
$1,795 |
$2,400 |
-$605 |
Hokianga Link Passengers |
71 |
78 |
-7 |
242 |
234 |
12 |
Hokianga Link Revenue |
$406 |
$543 |
-$137 |
$1,332 |
$1,628 |
-$296 |
Far North Link Passengers |
212 |
396 |
-184 |
834 |
1,196 |
-362 |
Far North Link Revenue |
$625 |
$1,001 |
-$376 |
$2,361 |
$3,026 |
-$665 |
Bream Bay Link Passengers |
33 |
24 |
9 |
127 |
66 |
61 |
Bream Bay Link Revenue |
$246 |
$86 |
$160 |
$883 |
$238 |
$645 |
Hikurangi Link Passengers |
11 |
24 |
-13 |
34 |
66 |
-32 |
Hikurangi Link Revenue |
$42 |
$78 |
-$36 |
$42 |
$78 |
-$36 |
Whangārei Heads Link Passengers |
3 |
24 |
-21 |
30 |
66 |
-36 |
Whangārei Heads Link Revenue |
$13 |
$104 |
-$91 |
$130 |
$287 |
-$157 |
Farebox Revenue Recovery
Waka Kotahi (NZ Transport Agency) has extended their financial assistance through to 31 December 2021 for farebox revenue lost as a result of the COVID-19 related passenger decline. This subsidy assistance is at the approved financial assistance rate of 54%.
The Ministry of Transport and Waka Kotahi are looking at alternative funding options to continue this assistance.
Please note that this financial assistance is not reflected in the above figures as it is paid separately.
Rose Street Bus Terminus Update
The commencement of the first phase of the upgrade to the Rose Street Bus Terminus is planned to commence in early/mid-January 2022. A temporary Vine St terminus is being worked on with Whangārei District Council (WDC) and local businesses. This is important as Rose St Terminal will be closed for planned upgrade work.
Free bus rides to and from your vaccination appointment
Free bus travel for persons wanting to access COVID-19 vaccination centres will continue to 31 December 2021. Waka Kotahi will be covering the cost for these passengers.
Proposed Kerikeri Link Summer Service
Following consultation with the Far North District Council and the operator regarding the uncertainty of COVID-19 alert levels, coupled with the real risk of Auckland remaining at Alert Level 3 through the Christmas and New Year period, the decision has been made to postpone the implementation of this trial service to a later date.
Total Mobility (TM)
|
Total |
Monthly Actual Expend |
Monthly Budgeted Expend |
Monthly Variance |
Year/Date Actual Expend |
Year/Date Budgeted Expend |
Annual Variance |
Sept 2021 |
1,257 |
$17,528 |
$25,000 |
-$7,472 |
$61,821 |
$75,000 |
-$13,179 |
ROAD SAFETY UPDATE
Road Trauma Update - 2021 Year to Date Road Death Statistics
Fatalities this year |
Far North |
Whangārei |
Kaipara |
Northland |
National |
Local roads |
4 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
142 |
State highways |
6 |
6 |
7 |
19 |
122 |
TOTAL |
10 |
8 |
9 |
27 |
264 [1] |
Motorcycle Safety - Ride Forever (R4E) Rider Training Update R4E – 2020/2021 – 186 completed courses R4E – 2021/2022 – 22 completed courses year to date Motorcycle Awareness Month (MAM) - October 2021 Social Media events and weekly focus points: Week 1 - Celebration of Motorcycle Safety Week 2 - Upgrading Rider Skills Week 3 - Wearing the Correct Motorcycle Gear Week 4 - Motorcycle Technical Safety |
|
Labour Weekend Driver Reviver/Fatigue Stop:
This event was cancelled due to COVID-19 travel restrictions.
Road Safety Promotion/Media Themes for September 2021 & October 2021
Road safety promotional and media-related themes for September and October will concentrate on:
Motorcycling
Distractions
Alcohol
Young Drivers
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Warnings and activations
The following weather watches and warnings were issued by MetService and monitored during October:
3 Severe Weather Watches and 1 Severe Weather Warning for 7/8 October
This rainfall resulted in a landslip at Te Ngaere with land clearing activities above the properties thought to be a contributing factor, impacting a house on Wainui Road. Fire and Emergency New Zealand and Far North District Council building inspectors responded to the incident to assist the building owners and occupants.
4 Severe Weather Watches for 20/21 October
3 Severe Weather Watches and 3 Severe Weather Warnings for 22/23 October
Rain was concentrated about the eastern hills as forecast, with Touwai receiving the highest rainfall for the duration of the event with 271mm, followed by Wiroa Rd (northeast of Ōkaihau) with 216mm, Ngunguru with 203mm and Puhipuhi on 192 mm.
Main river catchments effected during this event were the Oruru River with flooding on the flats, Kāeo River with flooding at Dip Road and across SH10, flooding in the Waitangi catchment and on the Whakapara swamp area.
FENZ dispatched volunteers to Kāeo to observe any flooding in the area.
COVID-19 Delta Alert Levels for Northland
On Friday 8 October at 11.59pm, Northland went to Alert Level 3 for 11 days
On Tuesday 19 October at 11.59pm, Northland went down to and remains (at the time of writing) at Alert Level 2
Collaboration continues with the lead agency, the Northland District Health Board (NDHB), and several other support agencies including emergency services, NEMA, councils and others. COVID planning continues as new information is released by central government and participation and support through the Northland Intersectoral Forum Regional Leadership Group on behalf on the NRC and CDEM.
Tsunami Readiness - Tsunami Siren Testing
The Northland tsunami siren network was tested at the start of Daylight Saving, Sunday 26 September at 10.00am for 10 minutes and 10.30am for 30 seconds to ensure they were operating as per their design specification. The usual public information and awareness programme was implemented leading up to and during the testing.
Each siren is monitored by volunteers within coastal communities and the results are received by Civil Defence staff. Several faults were detected in the sirens, mainly strobe lights on the top of the sirens not operating.
The contract for the tsunami siren replacement program over the coming 3 years is being finalised and a Project Manager to oversee the project is being sought.
Capability Development - CIMS
This year there has been an increased demand from partner agencies for Coordinated Incident Management System (CIMS4) training and associated function training.
To address the increased need, 6 x CIMS4 specific courses are programmed for 2022 across Northland.
Northland Lifelines Group (NLG)
The Northland Lifelines Utility Group held its quarterly meeting online on Friday 29 October. The meeting covered COVID-19 business continuity planning, approval of the 2022 work programme and the launch of the Climate Change Risk Assessment for the NLG.
The Climate Change Risk Assessment is intended to cover the direct climate change impacts on lifeline utility assets and services (exposure, vulnerability, and risk), not the consequential impacts on communities. The information provided through this project will inform detailed community impact assessments being undertaken by Far North, Kaipara, and Whangārei District Councils.
A project team has been established to work with the Project Manager and contract provider. The project is being partially funded by the NEMA Resilience fund: $25,000.
CDEM Group and Coordinating Executive Group (CEG)
The CDEM Group and CEG were scheduled to hold their quarterly meetings on 10 November. Included in the agenda items was the approval of the Northland CDEM Group Plan that has been rewritten and revised in accordance with the CDEM Act 2002 requirements. This is the fourth group plan to be developed. The group also received a presentation on the progress of the Northland Multi-Agency Coordinating Centre.
The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) has advised that a full rewrite of the CDEM Act 2002 will occur during 2022. Earlier proposals had been to amend the existing legislation; however, a full rewrite of the legislation is now proposed with a timeline that would have the new legislation being enacted for the beginning of 2023.
NEMA are also continuing to work on the development of a strategy that outlines how the agency will work with CDEM Groups going forward. A full-day strategy workshop was held on 3 November that included representatives from Maori and iwi. Northland were represented by the two Northland CEG Iwi representatives.
Welfare
The Northland Welfare Coordination Group held its quarterly meeting on 5 November with an online meeting focusing on the COVID-19 Delta response.
MARITIME
Commercial Shipping
Shipping to Whangārei was slightly disrupted over labour weekend with a combination of poor weather, and the failure of a wave data buoy while the backup was under service. Shipping was suspended until communication with the buoy was re-established.
Currently Pilot Operations manuals are being updated and work continues on an upgrade plan for the buoys and beacons to the upper and lower Whangārei harbour.
The Harbourmaster is working with Golden Bay Cement to establish dredging requirements to improve safety in the Portland channel and one superyacht was piloted into and out of Ōpua in Bay of Islands.
Work is almost complete for the tender of the replacement pilot/work boat Waikare including the final details for the proposed design features.
COVID-19 restrictions affected several meetings, conferences, and training courses:
A Northern Harbourmasters meeting was attended via Teams due to travel restrictions.
The NZ Pilots Annual Conference was postponed due to travel restrictions.
The Annual Oil Spill Conference was cancelled.
The regional On Scene Commanders’ Course for oil spill response was cancelled. Northland had two staff scheduled to attend.
The Advanced Pilots Training Course, required as part of pilot license requirements, has been moved online.
Recreational Boating
Three vessels were removed and destroyed from Whangārei harbour by the Maritime team. Another six abandoned and/or derelict vessels are in the process of being removed, with more time being given to owners due to COVID-19 travel restrictions. Two vessels are being managed by the team until owners can return to Northland.
Planning for the Recreational Boating Summer Campaign is progressing well. The Summer Ambassador for the Far North (based in Ahipara) has been appointed. They will provide education to remote northern communities over summer, continuing the excellent work and connections established last summer. Promotional material is being developed.
All Harbour Wardens have new contracts in place. They are required to complete a minimum number of hours in their role of recreational boating education, enforcement and reporting requirements.
Buoys and beacons maintenance has been completed at Mangonui and Taipā. After surviving ten years, the beacon on Albert Reef in Doubtless Bay has been damaged by high wave action and is under repair in the Ōpua workshop.
Replacement navigational sign panels for boat ramps throughout Northland are being delivered with the panels replaced before summer.
The Maritime team are holding an Oil Spill Response exercise in Ōpua on Tuesday 9 November. This is one of two annual exercises that are carried out under our contract with Maritime NZ.
RIVERS AND NATURAL HAZARDS
Rivers Long Term Plan Projects
Rivers |
Comments |
Awanui |
Northern Floodway Benching contract has been awarded; work is expected to start the first week of November. Kaitaia Rugby Club Floodway Benching will be tendered early November along with Milky Way flood wall. |
Otīria/Moerewa |
WSP-OPUS has started the detailed design for the new Pokapu Road Bridge. |
Matangirau |
Staff are progressing with landowner agreement. |
Kerikeri |
Waipapa Industrial Estate Flood Mitigation tender is live, closing Thursday 11 November. |
Natural Hazards
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
Region-Wide River Flood Mapping |
95% complete |
These flood maps are in addition (complimentary) to the existing Priority Rivers Flood Hazard Maps and will be combined in one layer on the website portal. This was workshopped with NRC Councillors on Tuesday 28 September. The FNDC workshop was held on Thursday 30 September. The KDC and WDC workshops are planned for Wednesday 3 November. It is our aim to go public in the middle of November, for which a communication plan is under development in collaboration with our TA colleagues. |
Website Natural Hazards Portal |
78% complete |
Morphum Environmental have been engaged to develop the portal. The second draft was received for feedback by participants by Friday 3 September, followed up by a second virtual catch-up. The next phase of the development of the portal is underway, e.g., landing page, flooding and Te Ao Māori aspects, story maps, and sea level rise viewer. It is our vision to ‘go public’ by the end of 2021. |
Whangārei Inner Harbour Hydrodynamic Model |
99% complete |
Final model outputs and report have been received following QA/QC check and comments on the report. Model outputs/maps to be incorporated on our website page map portal replacing the existing ‘bath-tub’ model maps. |
Raupo Drainage Scheme – Coastal Flood Hazard Analysis & Mitigation Options |
15% complete |
We have engaged Water Technology (WT) to do detailed hydraulic modelling from all perspectives, i.e., catchment, river and most importantly coastal. The objective is to establish a detailed base model and to develop flood hazard mitigation options, particularly from a coastal perspective, and adaptation planning. The project team consists of NRC and KDC staff, Chair of the Drainage Committee, and the Consultants. NRC are taking the modelling analysis lead on this project. Surveys, data collection, assets inspection and ‘building’ of the hydraulic model is underway. First draft ‘results’ are expected by the end of 2021 |
Whangārei (CBD) River Catchment Flood Model |
35% complete |
Upgrade of the hydraulic model including new structures, updated LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and sea level rise values and recalibration. Initial draft outcomes have been delayed until the beginning of December due to over commitment by the consultant. This hydraulic model will be shared with WDC as they, in parallel, are developing their storm water model. |
Climate Change Response
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
NRC Climate Change Strategy “Ngā Taumata o te Moana” and implementation plan |
Adopted and actions progressing |
Progress on recommended actions in the implementation plan will be reported on at the Climate Change Working Party meeting on Wednesday 10 November. |
Te Taitokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy |
Draft V2.3 – council workshops |
Workshops have been held with all Councils, Te Taitokerau Māori and Council (TTMAC) as well as tangata whenua representative groups, prior to final drafting, presentation, and adoption at the Monday 29 November Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee. The Coastal Adaptation programme is in development, including exposure assessment of 63 coastal communities to support TAs to select sites for community adaptation planning. |
Job descriptions for the Climate Change roles, documented in the Long Term Plan, are currently being finalised for approval. Recruitment for these positions is due to begin shortly. Until these positions are filled, essential Climate Change Strategy implementation actions are being progressed by members of the Rivers and Natural Hazards team, and Strategic Policy team.
The draft National Emissions Reduction Plan contents were presented to Council at the Wednesday 27 October Council Workshop. A summary of this paper is being presented to the Climate Change Working Party on Wednesday 10 November and consultation with TTMAC is also underway. The NRC draft submission on the National Emissions Reduction Plan will be developed by the Strategic Policy team and presented for approval at the 16 November Council meeting before the final version is submitted to the Ministry of the Environment by 24 November.
NORTHLAND WIDE LIDAR SURVEY
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
Regional LiDAR Survey |
In progress |
NRC is awaiting delivery of QA dataset from RPS (Contractor). Checks are to be made by NRC & LINZ prior to the generation of final deliverables. |
8.3.6 CORPORATE SERVICES
Enterprise System
Timeline - On track, elaboration & design workshops commenced
Budget - tracking under budget
Quality - quality meeting expectations
Fraud Declaration
I am not aware of any fraud nor am I investigating any incidence or suspected incidence of fraud at this time.
COUNCIL PROPERTY AND FLEET UPDATE
Construction work on the Kaipara Service Centre is ongoing at Alert L2. Canam continue to have challenges with accessing some subcontractors based in Auckland under Alert Level 3. They are engaging Northland based subcontractors as a solution, where possible. Kaipara District Council has been notified of facility handover being likely in April 2022, or later depending on the status of lockdown in Northland and/or Auckland going forward.
Both the Code of Compliance Certificate and the subdivision application for Kensington Crossing has been granted by Whangārei District Council. The unconditional sale can now settle immediately following LINZ awarding titles, expected on or around mid-November 2021.
Construction work on council’s Water Street building has come to completion with an opening of the KMR offices area planned for early December 2021.
The NIWA Kingfish RAS project has received Building Consent and the head contract agreement with CB Civil has been executed. CB Civil are set up on site with council staff’s initial Health and Safety inspection being 9 November 2021.
In line with council’s recently approved vehicle fleet policy, two hybrid vehicles have been purchased for the KMR Project and four full electric vehicles are due for delivery early December 2021 replacing older ones in council’s fleet. A further five hybrids are on order for delivery early 2022 to replace existing diesel vehicles.
8.3.7 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Submissions lodged under delegated authority during the month of October 2021 |
|
Land Management |
Submission on proposed Freshwater farm plan regulations |
Land Management |
Submission on proposed changes to the low slope map (Stock exclusion regulations) |
Sustainable Hill Country and Regional Priorities
Milestones |
Status |
Soil Conservation Plans |
Soil Conservation Plan template complete. Internal processes including IRIS reports in development. |
Stakeholder engagement |
Land Management Advisors conducting follow up phone calls to landowners who were sent a letter inviting them to take advantage of grants for erosion control work. |
Poplar and Willow Nursery
Milestones |
Status |
Nursery expansion |
Nursery business case currently underway. Target delivery date is end of December 2021. This will inform our future expansion options and will be workshopped with council. |
Environment fund progress
Fifty-two projects were approved on 1 October 2021. The results are as below:
Objective |
General Efund |
Catchment Groups |
Terrestrial Biodiversity |
Coastcare |
DA allocation |
$380,327.00 |
$10,000.00 |
$49,999.90 |
$20,122.00 |
SHaRP
Eight fencing projects totalling $78,805.75 were approved on 1 October 2021.
Year-1 report accepted by MfE and invoiced money received
Q1/Year-2 report to MfE underway
Waimā Waitai Waiora Partnership
Waimā Waitai Waiora website completed (https://www.waimawaitaiwaiora.co.nz/)
Million Metres (Sustainable Business Network) have raised $25,655.35 for the WWW partnership.
Wananga facilitated by Reconnecting Northland for the research component of the WWW partnership (Te Kawa Waiora) have been delayed due to Covid-19 alert levels.
Maintenance checks on planting sites being undertaken.
Natural resources
Coastal/Water Quality Operations
All routine monitoring was delayed due to the covid restrictions, however most of these programmes should be completed in the final two weeks of October.
Construction of new continuous dissolved oxygen (DO) monitoring stations commenced to ensure the sensors will be ready for deployment over the summer period. A total of 21 DO sensors will be deployed over summer, collecting DO readings every 15 minutes. The data will greatly improve council’s knowledge of the ecosystem metabolism (ecological health) of these rivers and streams and meets the NPS-FW monitoring requirements.
HYDROLOGY
Rainfall Northland had good rainfall in October 2021 with a regional average of 244mm. Cape Rēinga was the driest over October 2021, recording only 79.6mm of rainfall; the wettest catchment was Towai recording 463.5mm of rainfall. All rainfall stations in Northland recorded over 100% of expected rainfall for October 2021. Once again Cape Rēinga was the lowest with 105%, while Ngunguru and Waitangi catchments were the joint highest with 500% of expected rainfall for October 2021.
|
|
|
Rivers All river catchments received over 100% of the expected rainfall for the month As
indicated in the map, all major river catchment flows are above normal for |
Groundwater Due to significant October rainfall recharge, most groundwater aquifers are above normal October levels. Kaikohe and Tara aquifers are normal; the Mangawhai aquifer was still recovering recording low water level.
|
|
|
|
Area |
Status |
Percentile |
|
Aupōuri |
Above Normal |
60th + |
|
Taipā |
Above Normal |
60th + |
|
Russell |
Above Normal |
60th + |
|
Kaikohe |
Normal |
40 - 60th |
|
Whangārei |
Above Normal |
60th + |
|
Marsden-Ruakākā |
Above Normal |
60th + |
|
Porotī |
Above Normal |
60th + |
|
Mangawhai |
Low |
10 - 25th |
|
Ruawai |
Above Normal |
60th + |
NATURAL RESOURCES DATA
The Environmental Data Hub went live on 18 October 2021. It contains environmental data from sites monitored across Northland. A communication plan has been developed for the Hub. (Link to website)
Hilltop Mobility Solution/Survey123 Project: Hills Labs are working with regional councils on the integration of Survey 123 into Hilltop. Survey 123 is the software used to collect field data. Hilltop is the database that stores the data. New electronic data collection forms are currently being developed for lake levels and groundwater levels. A review of the existing forms will be completed before the summer sampling season. The RECOCO project ensures consistent electronic field capture across all regional councils and centralises the IT resourcing required to implement.
The implementation of the biological database is scheduled for most modules (Macro-invertebrates, periphyton etc.) in December 2021.
NATURAL RESOURCES SCIENCE
Air Quality and Carbon Emission
Over September 2021, no air quality exceedances were recorded for ambient PM10 and PM2.5 at the Whangārei and Ruakākā airsheds. [2]
The report titled “Whangārei and Kaitaia Air Emission Inventories for Particulate Matter – 2018” from Pattle Delamore Partners (PDP) has been received. It was commissioned to undertake further assessment of Northland airsheds to assist with determining the best locations for monitoring as part of the environmental monitoring networks review. The main findings are summarised below:
The emission inventories included four major source types: home heating, road transport, industry and backyard burning.
The largest contributors to annual PM10 emissions in Whangārei are found to be home heating and transport. While home heating contributions to annual PM10 are 45%, daily contributions in winter are significantly higher (71%) as most homes with fuel burning heating devices are used in winter. Similar source type patterns are seen in the Whangārei airshed PM2.5 emissions, with home heating emissions being slightly more prominent.
The largest contributor to annual PM10 emissions in the Kaitaia airshed was industry at 76%. While home heating contributions to annual PM10 emissions are just 15%, the daily contributions in winter are higher (35%). Similar source type and patterns are seen in the Kaitaia airshed PM2.5 emissions, with home heating emissions being more prominent.
Annual and winter day PM10 and PM2.5 emission source contributions in percentage to the Whangārei and Kaitaia airsheds are broken down in the table below.
Whangārei Airshed PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions by Source (%)
|
Home Heating |
Transport |
Industry |
Backyard Burning |
||||
|
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
Annual |
45 |
54 |
32 |
30 |
15 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
Winter day |
71 |
78 |
17 |
14 |
8 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Kaitaia Airshed PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions by Source (%)
|
Home Heating |
Transport |
Industry |
Backyard Burning |
||||
|
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
Annual |
15 |
19 |
6 |
6 |
76 |
72 |
3 |
3 |
Winter day |
35 |
40 |
4 |
4 |
59 |
54 |
2 |
2 |
A comparison of the 2006 and 2018 Whangārei airshed inventories suggests a reduction in total winter day PM10 emissions in the Whangārei airshed of approximately 27% from 1.2 tonnes per day to 0.9 tonnes per day.
The report suggests a large reduction in industrial PM10 emissions in the Whangārei airshed of 66% over the years 2006 to 2018. This can be attributed to no new major PM10 emission sources to have been consented in that period in the airshed and two major consented industries (Ballance Fertiliser and TDC Sawmill) which have ceased operating since 2006.
Between 2006 and 2018, PM10 emissions from transport increased by 44%. This increase could be due to an increase in vehicle numbers during this period.
PM10 emissions from home heating and backyard burning decreased 14 and 78 percent respectively in the Whangārei airshed between 2006 and 2018. The decrease in home heating is expected as newer homes either have low emission wood burners or use heat pumps to heat their homes. The root cause for the decrease in emissions is unknown, it could be a result of the burning rule change in 2008 for the Whangārei airshed.
Council’s CO2-e (carbon dioxide equivalent) monthly emissions from 2018
are presented in the graph below. Since April 2021, council’s CO2-e emission has increased every month (in comparison with
the same months in 2020) except August and
September 2021. Lower emissions from April 2020 to March 2021 and again in
August and September 2021, are largely attributed to the COVID-19
restrictions/lockdown. The graph is based on live data and therefore figures
for the last few months are subject to change.
Council started carbon emission reporting from 2018 calendar year, which is considered as a base year. Therefore, 2018 emissions are represented in a line graph.
Coastal
· Between January and March 2021, council and the Patuharakeke Trust Board conducted an ecological survey and a cultural health assessment of the Waipū Estuary Significant Ecological Area. Analysis and reporting of this assessment is now complete.
· The ecological survey included a quadrat survey of 63 sites, shellfish core sampling at 70 sites, five-minute bird surveys at eight sites and eDNA sampling. The survey identified two Hū ai (cockle beds) with high densities of harvestable Hū ai and one Hanikura (wedge shell) bed. Areas of dense adult Kōkata (pipi) were also found in the river channel of the estuary but there did not appear to be a well-defined Kōkata bed. · In total, 16 different marine benthic invertebrate taxa were identified. No non-native invertebrate species were found, and the species present are indicative of a healthy sand flat. The bird surveys identified 26 different bird taxa, including 13 species that are either ‘threatened’ or ‘at risk’. Results from the eDNA sampling identified 36 different taxa. This included 19 fish including several important cultural and commercial species such as Kanae (mullet), Kahawai, Tāmure (snapper), Ihe (piper), and Kātaha (yellow-eye mullet). |
Total cockle density per m2 in Waipū Estuary |
· The cultural assessment involved Patuharakeke kaitiaki collectively scoring eight different indicators of cultural health. Each of the eight indicators were scored from 1 (takutai-mate – poor coastal condition) to 5 (takutai-ora – healthy coastal condition) with these scores combined to provide one overall indicator of mauri. The mauri of the Waipū Estuary recorded a score of 4 and the Waipū Lagoon a score of 3. Patuharakeke continue to work to further develop their capability to capture nuances in takutai health by further developing their localised cultural health monitoring programmes into the future.
Water Allocation
The Regional Plan for Northland (RP) sets out allocation limits for rivers based on a percentage of the flow statistic “7-day mean annual low flow” (MALF). These allocation limits were informed by technical assessments including modelling undertaken by NIWA using the Environmental Flow Strategic Allocation Platform (EFSAP). The allocation limits are applied at locations where alternative limits have not already been established by conditions of existing consents. In many cases these alternative limits are based on the flow statistic “1 in 5 year 7-day low flow” (Q5).
NRC commissioned NIWA to undertaken additional regional modelling to assess the potential impact on the instream habitat of key fish species and reliability of supply for an allocation regime being based on Q5, i.e., existing consent conditions.
Although the modelling has limitations, the outcomes indicate an alternative regional allocation regime based on the Q5 flow stat is likely to increase adverse effects on instream ecosystem health, compared to the existing regional allocation regime based on a percentage of MALF. The report recommends specific catchment investigations be undertaken, rather than regional modelling, to determine the appropriateness of alternative allocation regimes.
Freshwater quality
Monitoring plans for freshwater quality (rivers and lakes) and associated technical documents have been produced for finalising the Stage 2 report of the Monitoring Network Review. Freshwater monitoring plans are now in the process of being signed-off by the Natural Resources (NR) managers following the consideration of feedback from the NR Operation teams.
Feedback to the draft national sediment guidance document to implement NPS-FM sediment attributes (prepared by NIWA) have been provided to MfE by relevant staff members from the Science, Land Management and Policy teams.
Feedback to the National Freshwater Accounting Framework guidelines by relevant staff members from the Science and Policy teams have been provided to MfE.
River ecosystem metabolism based on continuous dissolved oxygen (DO): The purpose of this Envirolink and partly council funded project (commissioned to Cawthron Institute) was to get advice and guidance on data management and reporting of the NPS-FM attributes related to continuous DO measurements. The final report, together with a data analysis automation tool (using R-code), have been delivered. Staff are assessing next steps.
POLICY AND PLANNING
Proposed Regional Plan
The Environment Court has released its decisions on Topic 5 Water Quality and Topic 8 Agrichemicals (the latter providing parties with 10 working days to comment on the wording of the provisions). Council has identified several minor changes that will improve and clarify the Agrichemical provisions and has circulated these to other parties for feedback prior to lodging with the Court. The Judge will review the suggested changes and make final directions. Topic 5 is now resolved.
The Court has issued a minute requesting parties to the appeals on Topic 14 Fishing Controls/Marine Protected Areas asking for their views on whether recent case law and articles by Dame Anne Salmond are of relevance, and whether the Court should re-open the hearing to consider the materials. The parties met and agreed that the materials are relevant but that these can be taken into account during on-going discussions between parties, with no need to delay the release of the Court’s decision.
The hearing on stock exclusion provisions (Topic 16) has been pushed back by the Environment Court to the 10-12 November due to COVID-19 restrictions in Auckland. The hearing will be held virtually with the Court advising that there are now no available hearing times available prior to November 2022.
Freshwater Plan Change
The Tangata Whenua Water Advisory Group (TWWAG) met on 11 October with the Director responsible for Te Mana o Te Wai and other staff from the Ministry for the Environment (MfE). The meeting discussed the workplan of TWWAG and the opportunity for MfE support. TWWAG also held an internal workshop to finalise their initial work (background analysis) and to further refine the next stages of their work. TWWAG will present their work to date to the November TTMAC hui.
The Primary Sector Liaison Group (PSLG) are providing feedback on the freshwater issues / challenges / opportunities for them in Northland for discussion at their November meeting.
National Initiatives
Climate Change
Emissions reduction – the government has released a discussion document as a prelude to developing the first Emissions Reduction Plan in May 2022. Please refer to council agenda item on this matter.
Waste Management
The Government is consulting on a proposed new waste strategy that sets the direction to transform the way we manage waste. https://consult.environment.govt.nz/waste/taking-responsibility-for-our-waste/supporting_documents/wastestrategyandlegislationconsultationdocument.pdf
The consultation includes issues and options for developing more comprehensive waste legislation to regulate the management of waste, and products and materials circulating in our economy. Once developed, the new legislation would replace the Waste Minimisation Act 2008 and the Litter Act 1979). Submissions close 26 November 2021. Staff do not consider a council submission is warranted on the basis that the matter is best informed by those in the sector with more specialist expertise.
District Plans
NRC is a s.274 party to an appeal on Proposed Plan Change 78 to the Kaipara District Plan. Discussions with parties have been ongoing and mediation is scheduled for late November, early December 2021.
8.3.8 GOVERNANCE AND ENGAGEMENT
MĀORI ENGAGEMENT
Te Oneroa-a-Tohē Board
A review of the governance structure by the Board to reset the Technical Steering Group to ensure the implementation of the plan has iwi and council technical expertise to deliver on the objectives of the plan.
Water Resilience Projects
Māori technical expertise provided to support the Water Resilience Working Group, CDEM and Te Rarawa to map significant water projects across Taitokerau.
Working across central government agencies ie. Ministry for Environment to fund applicants connecting with council staff to align water projects with an increased focus on customer centric service delivery.
Hapū Iwi Environmental Planning Fund
This fund has gone live on our website for the October 2021 Iwi/Hapū Environmental Management Plan Fund and is a contestable fund established to help Iwi/Hapū develop planning documents recognised by an Iwi Authority, as required under the Resource Management Act 1991 (section 74 (2A)). These documents must then be considered when developing or changing regional plans or policy statements.
The requirement for formal planning documents will help Iwi/Hapū become more involved in resource management processes by building their capacity, and at the same time capturing their current environmental knowledge, passion, and practice. Application criteria applies and can be found on our website (www.nrc.govt.nz/iwiplans) and provides information for the public:
Information on what an Environmental Management Plan is and its importance
Funding for these plans
Application criteria for the fund
FAQ’s
Plans held by council
Link to the application form
Te Whāriki Core Cultural Competency Programme Level 2 cultural competency programmes continue to build competency and confidence of staff to engage meaningfully with tangāta whenua. Koiake Consultancy has been contracted to deliver these programmes, pictured here with our science, monitoring and land management teams at Terenga Paraoa Marae. |
|
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Investment and Growth Reserve – Projects Report
Update |
Future developments/ reporting |
|
REL |
Formal proposal yet to be received. However, progress is being made and proposal expected very soon. |
Review proposal and negotiate an agreement. |
Extension 350 |
2021/22 quarter one report received for period ending 30 Sept. Quarterly evaluation meeting held 6 October. |
Second quarter invoice to be paid. |
Hundertwasser Art Centre |
Workshop discussion with councillors on the funding condition associated with the appointment of a council representative to the committee overseeing the operation of HAC. Received third tranche payment request for $300,000 on practical completion (22 October). |
Following a council decision on appointing a council representative (to be made at this council meeting), payment of the third invoice will be made and decision communicated to Hātea Art Precinct Trust. Fourth and final payment of $200,000 on opening |
COVID-19 – provided further analysis on the impact of the latest COVID-19 lockdowns on economic activity in Northland (varying alert levels, supply chain, tourism spending).
Te Taitokerau Northland Economic Action Plan – developed an infographic of progress in key monitoring indicators since 2015.
Digital – workshop update for councillors and set up meeting between DEG and Crown Infrastructure Partners.
Taitokerau Northland Destination Management Plan – participated in the inaugural meeting of the working group established to implement the DMP launched in September.
Te Tai Tokerau Water Trust – met with Trust to get update on project including financial details.
Regional Projects Reserve – commence work with Finance team to develop a criteria and procedures for the allocation of funding from this Reserve established in the Long Term Plan 2021-2031.
ONLINE CHANNELS
Highlights: Our new Environmental Data Hub was launched mid-October. The Hub brings together data from all our environmental monitoring sites making it easier to access and view data about Northland’s environment.
Most popular content on Facebook: Most popular post for October - “Super Saturday Covid vaccination ride free”. The post had a reach of 8,628 people with 508 people engaged.
*Engaged – number of people who ‘reacted’, commented, or shared the post
Key Performance Indicators |
Jun-21 |
Jul 21 |
Aug-21 |
Sep-21 |
Oct-21 |
WEB |
|
|
|
|
|
# Visits to the NRC website |
34,100 |
36,300 |
29,700 |
34,900 |
41,300 |
E-payments made |
9 |
54 |
38 |
29 |
33 |
# subscription customers (cumulative) |
1,287 |
1,280 |
1,278 |
1,286 |
1,273 |
SOCIAL MEDIA (cumulative) |
|
|
|
|
|
# Twitter followers |
1,555 |
1,554 |
1,557 |
1,562 |
1,566 |
# NRC Facebook fans |
10,441 |
10,454 |
10,500 |
10,500 |
10,500 |
# NRC Overall Facebook Reach |
62,800 |
90,600 |
94,500 |
56,300 |
37,300[3] |
# NRC Engaged Daily Users |
3,249 |
3,811 |
2,760 |
2,502 |
1,479 |
# CDEM Facebook fans |
25,271 |
25,279 |
25,287 |
25,419 |
25,700 |
# CDEM Overall Facebook Reach |
29,300 |
70,600 |
208,700 |
344,100 |
325,000 |
# CDEM Engaged Daily Users |
1,410 |
3,324 |
23,000 |
27,400 |
54,700 |
# Instagram followers |
1,399 |
1,408 |
1,422 |
1,422 |
1,442 |
ENVIROSCHOOLS / EDUCATION
Project Pest Control Assessment Workshop
On 27 October, the final Project Pest Control assessment workshop for 2021 was held at Lonsdale Park. Project protocols in place, 30 students from Bay of Islands College, Northland College, Ōkaihau College and Taipā Area School gained qualifications in trapping multiple pests, skinning and plucking possums and pest animal biology and environmental impacts. Tutors from NRC Biosecurity, Can Train NZ, and the pest control industry also shared their career pathways and current jobs. The 20 Kaitaia College students are being assessed separately.
WaiFencing Workshops
On 28 and 29 October, the final WaiFencing course for 2021 was held on Pamu’s Rangiputa Station. Again, Covid protocols in place, 47 students from Broadwood Area School, Okaihau College and Taipa Area School gained qualifications in fence construction and repair, temporary electric fencing and tool identification. Cr Kitchen attended and Land Management gave a presentation on the importance of fencing off waterways. Tutoring was carried out by Can Train NZ, Pamu/Landcorp and NRC Land Management.
Nationwide Enviroschools Hui
For parts of 13 and 14 of October the 2021 nation-wide Enviroschools Hui was held online and attended by the NRC Enviroschools team. Topics discussed included: the recent Enviroschools survey, Toimata future focus project and the Ope community-wide project in South Auckland.
Enviroschools Communities Facilitated
Despite the school holidays and Covid levels, during October Enviroschools Facilitators had specific interactions with 67 school and early childhood communities.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INFORMATION (LGOIMA) REQUESTS
Total LGOIMAs |
Oct 2019 to Oct 2020 |
Oct 2019 to Oct 2020 |
194 |
193 |
|
Number of LGOIMAs not responded to within 20 working days |
0 |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
Telephone inbound call statistics & enquiries
|
Oct 2021 |
Call volume via Customer Services |
2,074 |
Average wait time |
7 sec |
Calls answered in under 30 seconds |
96.9% |
Calls stayed at the normal level in the October lockdown, whereas in previous lockdown the call volume had dropped to two thirds.
|
1 Jul 2018 – 30 Jun 2019 |
1 Jul 2019 – 30 Jun 2020 |
1 Jul 2020 – 30 Jun 2021 |
Call volume via Customer Services |
20,812 |
30,566 |
31,130 |
This is the call volume over the last three years using our 3CX system.
Mailroom email processing performance
The Customer Service’s enquiry management system is working well. Customer Services Team are continually improving the process of mailroom so that it benefits the wider council. Mail stayed at the normal volume during the lockdown in October.
|
Oct 2021 |
Mail processed |
819 |
Satisfaction monitoring
No compliments for the month of October.
The complaints have all been dealt with.
Feedback cards, compliments, and complaints
Compliments received |
Total |
No Compliments have been recorded for this month |
0 |
Total compliments recorded |
0 |
Complaints received |
Total |
· Land Management · City Link |
1 4 |
Total complaints recorded |
5 |
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 9.1
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Receipt of Committee Minutes |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist |
Authorised by: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 09 November 2021 |
That the unconfirmed minutes of the:
· Civil Defence Emergency Management Group meeting – 8 September 2021
· Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board meeting – 15 October 2021.
be received.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Civil Defence Emergency Management Group meeting - 8 September 2021 ⇩
Attachment 2: Te Oneroa a Tohe Board meeting - 15 October 2021 ⇩
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings |
From: |
Sally Bowron, Strategy, Governance and Engagement Team Admin/PA |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Auriole Ruka, Pou Manawhakahaere - GM Governance and Engagement, on date 10 November 2021 |
That the report ‘Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings’ be received.
Biodiversity and Biosecurity Working Party (Chair: Cr Craw)
The Biodiversity and Biosecurity Working Party met on 13 October 2021. The topics for discussion included:
· Kauri Protection – National Plan
· Kauri Protection – Track upgrade project
· Biosecurity Operational Report
· Predator Free 2050
· Deer Eradication Programme update
· Clean Hull Plan
· FIF Dune Lakes project update
· Biodiversity Strategy update
Following discussion, the Biodiversity and Biosecurity Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:
· The title ‘Kauri Protection’ is to replace Kauri Dieback in all titles.
· A draft copy of the Operational report is to be presented back to the Working Party for final review before presenting to council for adoption.
· Working Party to be kept informed with updates and progress in seeking formal Wild Animal Control Act delegations from the Department of Conservation.
· The Working Party supports the principal of the Clean Hull National Plan and asks staff to workshop the proposal with council ahead of seeking full council formal endorsement.
· Staff to provide a report on costings and feasibility of Hornwort eradication at lake Karaka and adjacent lakes to the next working party meeting.
Council Meeting ITEM: 10.0
16 November 2021
TITLE: |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to recommend that the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider the confidential matters detailed below for the reasons given.
1. That the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider confidential matters.
2. That the general subject of the matters to be considered whilst the public is excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to this matter, and the specific grounds under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution, are as follows:
Item No. |
Item Issue |
Reasons/Grounds |
10.1 |
Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - Council Meeting 19 October 2021 |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting -. |
10.2 |
Human Resources Report |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a). |
3. That the Independent Financial Advisors be permitted to stay during business with the public excluded.
Considerations
1. Options
Not applicable. This is an administrative procedure.
2. Significance and Engagement
This is a procedural matter required by law. Hence when assessed against council policy is deemed to be of low significance.
3. Policy and Legislative Compliance
The report complies with the provisions to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting as detailed in sections 47 and 48 of the Local Government Official Information Act 1987.
4. Other Considerations
Being a purely administrative matter; Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.
[1] Note future reporting will have comparative data with previous years.
[2] Note: The air quality data is always report two months behind due to the timing in which results are received.
[3] Facebook Reach is the number of unique users who had any content from a Facebook Page or about a Facebook Page enter their screen. Facebook increasingly works on a monetisation model meaning that increasing reach relies to a large extent on paying for it through campaigns and promoted activities which keep NRC posts prioritised in the news feed.
Council has not been running paid campaigns recently, and the drop in reach reflects the reach council’s page is able to achieve on the platform organically.