Council

Tuesday 22 February 2022 at 10.30am

 

 

AGENDA

 


Council Meeting

22 February 2022

Northland Regional Council Agenda

 

Meeting to be held remotely

on Tuesday 22 February 2022, commencing at 10.30am

 

Recommendations contained in the council agenda are NOT council decisions. Please refer to council minutes for resolutions.

 

RĪMITI (Item)                                                                                                                                           Page

1.0      Ngā Mahi Whakapai (Housekeeping)

This meeting will be held fully remote and attendees are responsible for their own health and safety and ensuring they are working in a safe environment.

2.0      Karakia Timatanga – Tauāki ā roto (Opening karakia)

2.0 A  Acknowledgement of those who have passed

3.0      Ngā Whakapahā (apologies)

4.0      Ngā Whakapuakanga (DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST)

5.0      Ngā Whakaae Miniti me te Mahere Mahi (Council Minutes and Action Sheet)

5.1      Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meeting 14 December 2021                   6

5.2      Receipt of Action Sheet                                                                                          15

6.0      Ngā Ripoata Putea (Financial Reports)

6.1      Financial Report to 31 January 2021                                                                   17

6.2      Update to Delegations                                                                                           21

7.0      Ngā Take (Decision Making Matters)

7.1      Northland Regional Council and Department of Conservation Memorandum of Understanding                                                                         28

7.2      Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision                                                                                     32

7.3      Water Resilience Fund - Criteria, Process and LTP Year 1 Allocation          45

7.4      Draft NRC feedback - Discussion document on resource management system reform                                                                                                          50

7.5      Proposed changes to the NES Drinking water - Council submission           73

7.6      Maritime Safety Management System (SMS)                                                   78

7.7      Solar Energy Expansion at Water Street Whangarei                                       82

7.8      Budget approval for CEO recruitment                                                                87

8.0      Ngā Ripoata Mahi (Operational Reports)

8.1      Health and Safety Report                                                                                       91

8.2      Chair's Report to Council                                                                                       97

8.3      Chief Executive’s Report to Council                                                                    99

8.4      Emergency Services Fund 2020-2021 Report                                                 139

8.5      Reporting on Long Term Plan 2021-2031 performance measures for quarters one and two of the 2021/22 year                                                     169

9.0      Receipt of Committee Minutes and Working Party/Group Updates

9.1      Receipt of Committee Minutes                                                                          171

9.2      Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings                                    197

10.0    Kaupapa ā Roto (Business with the Public Excluded)                                          198

10.1    Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - Council Meeting 14 December 2021

10.2    Human Resources Report

10.3    Strategic Review

10.4    Introduction of Continuity Capital Private Equity No. 7 Fund into the Long Term Investment Fund   


 

ACC - Accident Compensation Corporation

ALGIM - Association of Local Government Information Management

AMA - Aquaculture Management Area

AMP - Asset Management Plan/Activity Management Plan

AP - Annual Plan

BOI - Bay of Islands

BOPRC - Bay of Plenty Regional Council

CAPEX - Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets)

CBEC - Community, Business and Environment Centre

CCO – Council Controlled Organisation

CCTO – Council Controlled Trading Organisation

CDEM - Civil Defence Emergency Management

CEEF – Chief Executives Environment Forum

CEG - Co-ordinating Executive Group

CEO - Chief Executive Officer

CIMS - Co-ordinated Incident Management System (emergency management structure)

CMA - Coastal Marine Area

CPCA - Community Pest Control Areas

CRI - Crown Research Institute

DHB - District Health Board 

DOC - Department of Conservation

DP – District Plan

E350 – Extension 350 programme

ECA - Environmental Curriculum Award

ECAN - Environment Canterbury

EECA - Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority

EF - Environment Fund

EMA - Employers and Manufacturers Association

EOC - Emergency Operations Centre

EPA - Environmental Protection Authority

ETS - Emissions Trading Scheme

FDE - Farm Dairy Effluent

FNDC - Far North District Council

FNHL - Far North Holdings Limited

FPP - First Past the Post

GE - Genetic Engineering

GIS - Geographic Information System

GMO - Genetically Modified Organism

HBRC - Hawke's Bay Regional Council

HEMP - Hapū Environmental Management Plan

Horizons - Brand name of Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council

HR - Human Resources

HSNO - Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act 

HSWA - Health and Safety at Work Act 2015

IEMP - Iwi Environmental Management Plan

ILGACE - Iwi and Local Government Chief Executives Forum

IPPC - Invited Private Plan Change

IRIS - Integrated Regional Information System

KDC - Kaipara District Council 

KPI - Key Performance Indicator

LAWA – Land, Air, Water Aotearoa

LEA - Local Electoral Act 2001

LGA - Local Government Act 2002

LGNZ - Local Government New Zealand

LGOIMA - Local Government Official Information & Meetings Act 1987

LIDAR – Light detection and ranging

LTI – Long time injury

LTP - Long Term Plan

MBIE – Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment

MFE - Ministry for the Environment

MFL – Māori Freehold Land 

MHWS - Mean High Water Springs

MMH - Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited

MNZ - Maritime New Zealand

MOH - Ministry of Health

MOT - Ministry of Transport

MPI - Ministry for Primary Industries

MSD - Ministry of Social Development

NCMC - National Crisis Management Centre

NDHB - Northland District Health Board

NEMA – National Emergency Management Agency

NES - National Environmental Standards

NFT – Northland Forward Together

NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation

NIF - Northland Intersectoral Forum

NINC - Northland Inc. Limited

NIWA - National Institute of Water and Atmosphere

NORTEG - Northland Technical Advisory Group

NPS - National Policy Statement

NZCPS - New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement

NZRC - New Zealand Refining Company (Marsden Point)

NZTA – Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency

NZTE - New Zealand Trade and Enterprise

NZWWA - New Zealand Water and Wastes Association

OFI - Opportunity for Improvement\

OPEX – Operating Expenditures

OSH - Occupational Safety & Health

OTS – Office of Treaty Settlements

PCBU - Person Conducting Business or Undertaking

PGF – Provincial Growth Fund

PPE - Personal Protective Equipment

RAP - Response Action Plan

RBI - Regional Broadband Initiative

RCP - Regional Coastal Plan

RFI - Request for Information

RFP - Request for Proposal

RLTP - Regional Land Transport Plan

RMA - Resource Management Act 1991

RMG - Resource Managers Group (Regional Councils)

RMZ - Riparian Management Zone

ROI - Return on Investment

RP – Regional Plan

RPMP - Regional Pest Management Plan

RPMS - Regional Pest Management Strategy

RPS - Regional Policy Statement

RPTP – Regional Public Transport Plan

RRSAP – Regional Road Safety Action Plan

RSG – Regional Sector Group

RSHL - Regional Software Holdings Ltd

RTC - Regional Transport Committee

RTO - Regional Tourism Organisation

SIG – Special Interest Group

SIPO - Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives

SITREP - Situation Report

SOE - State of Environment (or) State Owned Enterprise

SOI – Statement of Intent

SOLGM - Society of Local Government Managers

STV - Single Transferable Vote

TAG - Technical Advisory Group

Tier 1 - Site level plan or response for an oil spill

Tier 2 - Regional level plan or response to an oil spill

Tier 3 - National level plan or response to an oil spill

TLA - Territorial Local Authority – City & District Councils

TON – Top of the North (regions)

TTMAC – Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party

TTNEAP – Tai Tokerau Northland Economic Action Plan

TMP - Treasury Management Plan

TOR - Terms of Reference

TPK - Te Puni Kōkiri (Ministry of Maori Development)

TUANZ - Telecommunications Users Association of NZ

UNISA - Upper North Island Strategic Alliance

WDC - Whangarei District Council

WHHIF - Whangarei Harbour Health Improvement Fund

WRC - Waikato Regional Council

WSMP - Workplace Safety Management Practices

 

 

 



Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 5.1

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meeting 14 December 2021

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist

Authorised by:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 16 February 2022

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the minutes of the meeting held on 14 December 2021, confirmed as a true and correct record.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Minutes of the council meeting - 14 December 2021   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 5.1

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 5.2

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Receipt of Action Sheet

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist

Authorised by:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 08 February 2022

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

The purpose of this report is to enable the meeting to receive the current action sheet.

 

Nga mahi tutohutia / Recommendation

That the action sheet be received.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Council Action Sheet - February 2022   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 5.2

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.1

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Financial Report to 31 January 2021

From:

Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 10 February 2022

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

This report is to inform council of the year to date (YTD) financial result to January 2022. Council has achieved a YTD surplus after transfers to and from reserves of $7.85M, which is $1.07M favourable to budget (November YTD: $245K). December gains on externally managed funds is the main contributor to an improved surplus over November but no gains have been accrued for January as it is expected to be a loss month for the majority of fund managers. Eriksens have advised that losses have been incurred due to equity sell offs in response to concerns about rising inflation and central bank interest rates. An update on fund performance to the end of January will be provided to the February council meeting.

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Financial Report to 31 January 2021’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 9 February 2022, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

   

Revenue

Year to date revenue is $42.75M, which is $579K or 1.4% above budget.


 


Expenditure

Year to date expenditure is $29.04M, which is $1.31M or 4.3% below budget. 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.1

22 February 2022

Salary Variances

Across council there is a $988K (November YTD: $804K) favourable salaries variance predominantly due to the time to complete recruitment of positions identified in the LTP (Long Term Plan) and some vacancies already present at the end of 2020/21. Of this $59K (November YTD: $25K) is related to subsidised work programmes. This variance is partially offset by $317K (September YTD: $278K) of annual leave earned not taken.

 

Transfers to reserves

For the year to date there has been a net transfer to reserves of $5.86M compared to a budgeted net transfer to reserves of $5.05M.  This is predominantly due to:

Ÿ $569K more than budgeted transfers to flood infrastructure river reserves due to higher than budgeted subsidies for capital flood works.

Ÿ $160K more than budgeted transfers to river reserves due to lower than budgeted YTD expenditure relating to maintenance and river clearance works not occurring when budgeted and higher than budgeted subsidies on flood schemes.

Ÿ $49K more than budgeted transfers to bus reserves due to lower than budgeted YTD expenditure.

 

Capital Expenditure

Capital expenditure of $2.06M is lower than the budget of $2.21M due to the timing of expenditure on flood works.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.2

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Update to Delegations

From:

Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 15 February 2022

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report seeks council approval for amendments to the delegations manual, which have not been sub-delegated and may only be approved by a council resolution.

 

These amendments include an update to the bank and cheque signatory delegations

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Update to Delegations’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and dated 21 January 2022, be received.

2.         That council approve the updated bank and cheque signatory delegations, as outlined in Attachment 1 pertaining to Item 6.2 of the 22 February 2022 council agenda.

 

 

Background/Tuhinga

For administrative efficiency and expediency when conducting day-to-day business, the council and its Chief Executive delegates certain statutory duties, responsibility and powers to committees, members or staff. 

 

Council’s delegation manual records delegations given to council officers in relation to administrative and financial matters, and in relation to statutory duties, responsibilities and powers. This is a living document that is reviewed periodically and is updated as necessary in response to legislative or staff changes.

 

The Chief Executive may authorise changes and updates to any delegations or matters to which he has been sub-delegated, however delegations made under the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Ratings) Act 2002 are not able to be sub-delegated and may only be approved by a council resolution.

 

Bank delegations

The delegation for authorising payment vouchers and authorising electronic payments on the council’s ASB Bank was last amended in August 2019.  Updates are now proposed in response to having additional staffing of a sufficient seniority to allow for better cover of banking duties for staff holidays, busy periods, and potential sickness cover in light of the current pandemic.

The amendment proposed by this report are:

1.    Add the Assistant Management Accountant as an approved signatory being able to authorise creditor and payroll transactions and operate council’s bank accounts.

 

An excerpt from the delegations manual for creating and authorising payments, including changes, is provided in Attachment 1.

 

 

Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Approve updates to delegations as recommended as included as Attachment 1

Increased staff numbers with banking delegations will allow for better cover of banking duties.

None

2

Do not approve updates to delegations.

None

Maintains our current level of bank authorisers with lower flexibility around leave and more risk from staff absence.

 

The staff’s recommended option is option 1.

Considerations

 

1.        Significance and engagement

Section 76AA of the LGA directs that council must adopt a policy setting out how significance will be determined, and the level of engagement that will be triggered.  This policy assists council in determining how to achieve compliance with the LGA requirements in relation to decisions.

This decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.  Council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

2.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The activities detailed in this report are in accordance with the council's Treasury Management Policy which was adopted in compliance with the decision making requirements of sections 76–82 of the Local Government Act 2002.

 

Further considerations

Being a purely administrative matter Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Banking delegations update   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.2

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.1

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Northland Regional Council and Department of Conservation Memorandum of Understanding

From:

Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services, on 09 February 2022

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

In early 2017 Northland Regional Council and the Department of Conservation signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).  The MOU seeks to formalise closer collaboration and co-operation between NRC and DOC to achieve greater environmental outcomes for the Northland community.

NRC and DOC staff have reviewed the MOU and the outcomes and delivery that this has supported.  While our working relationship and understanding of each others priorities has improved, the actual outcomes achieved on the ground has not advanced as much as initially anticipated.  With that in mind, the MOU has been reframed to focus on priority work areas and to establish a senior staff programme steering group to help ensure this mahi is progressed.

It is recommended that council approve the revised MOU and authorise the Chairperson to sign on behalf of council.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Northland Regional Council and Department of Conservation Memorandum of Understanding’ by Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services and dated 9 February 2022, be received.

2.         That the council approves the Memorandum of Understanding and delegation of authority to the NRC Chairperson to sign the memorandum on behalf of council.

 

Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Council chooses not to approve the MOU

N/A

Reduced collaboration and cooperation between NRC and DOC

2

Council chooses to sign the MOU between DOC and NRC

The relationship between DOC and NRC will enhance, focussing on specific shared strategic projects, have greater collaboration in planning and integrating functions where appropriated.

N/A

 

The staff’s recommended option is option 2.

Considerations

1.        Environmental Impact

It is anticipated that greater environmental outcomes will be achieved by both organisations having a closer more collaborative working relationship.

2.        Community views

Community views on the MOU between NRC and DOC are not known, however we would anticipate the community would be supportive of both organisations seeking to work more collaboratively to deliver more for our community and the environment. 

3.        Māori impact statement

Similarly to community view, it would be anticipated that Māori would be supportive of greater environmental outcomes being delivered from a closer working relationship between NRC and DOC.

4.        Financial implications

The MOU does not have any direct financial implication.

5.        Implementation issues

It will be important to ensure the new Programme Steering Group is established to ensure the MOU, and its intent, is fully realised and both organisations seek opportunities to work more collaboratively.

 

6.        Significance and engagement

The activities detailed in this report are provided for in the council’s 2021–2031 Long Term Plan, in respect of council’s biosecurity, biodiversity, and water management programmes and functions, and as such the decision in this report are in accordance with council’s decision making process and sections 76–82 of the LGA 2002. This report does not trigger council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

7.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

 The decision within this report is consistent with council policies and legislative compliance.  It is anticipated that the MOU will assist in managing the risk that both organisations are heading off in opposite directions, but rather seeks greater coordination.

Background/Tuhinga

A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been developed in conjunction with the Department of Conservation (DOC) and represents a review of the original MOU signed in February 2017. 

 

The MOU seeks to formalise closer collaboration and co-operation between NRC and DOC to achieve greater conservation outcomes for the Northland community.  It seeks to enhance our relationship and develop a greater understanding of how we work together by focussing on some specific shared strategic projects. The key areas of focus will be reviewed annually.

 

It is noted that the MOU has been drafted intentionally as a higher level document that affirms the intent and principles of collaboration and co-operation between NRC and DOC to achieve greater environmental outcomes for the Northland community. It is not the intent or purpose of the MOU to detail the specific details about the other work/projects that NRC collaborates on or has potential to collaborate on. This will be addressed through day to day management and the collaboration that currently occurs.

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Draft DOC / NRC Memorandum of Understanding   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 7.1

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.2

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision

From:

Ben Lee, Policy and Planning Manager

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services, on 08 February 2022

 

Executive Summary | Whakarāpopototanga

Council approval is sought to adopt Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision (Attachment 1).

Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision is a summary of the activities council plans to deliver as set out in the Long Term Plan 2021-2031 and council strategies (such as Ngā Taumata o te Moana: our strategy for tackling climate change), in the context of council’s longer term aims for the region. 

Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision has been prepared by staff and workshopped with councillors.  There has been no consultation or other engagement in its development – it has not been considered necessary given it is a pulling together and summarising of information. 

Council released a previous version of Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision soon after the adoption of the previous LTP and it proved to be popular with the public.

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision’ by Ben Lee, Policy and Planning Manager and dated 17 November 2021, be received.

2.         That council approves the adoption of Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision.

3.         That the Pou Tiaki Taiao - Group Manager Environmental Services be delegated ability to make any necessary minor changes to Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision, such as formatting, grammar, and spelling.

 

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Adopt Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision

Helpful summary of council activities for the public.

None

2

Don’t adopt Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision

None

Council doesn’t have a publication that helpfully summarises council’s activities.

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.

Considerations

1.        Environmental impact

None

2.        Community views

Community will likely appreciate having a document that helpfully summarises council’s activities.  The decision to approve the adoption of Te Pai Tawhiti: Our vision is unlikely to have a negative impact on the community because it is not committing the council to any new activity.

3.        Māori impact statement

Māori are likely to have a similar view to the community.

4.        Financial implications

Small cost of printing (budgeted).

5.        Implementation issues

None

6.        Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

7.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

There is no statutory basis to the document, which means:

Ÿ there is no legal requirement to have the document,

Ÿ there is no legal process that needs to be followed for its development, and

Ÿ it does not have any legal weight in future council decisions.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Te Pae Tawhiti: Our vision   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 7.2

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator


PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.3

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Water Resilience Fund - Criteria, Process and LTP Year 1 Allocation

From:

Tony Phipps, Contracted Advisor

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Victoria Harwood, Pou Tiaki Hapori - GM Community Resilience, on 10 February 2022

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The Northland Regional Council established a Water Resilience Fund in its Long Term Plan 2021-31.  The Water Resilience Fund provides $500,000 per year to support improving water resilience infrastructure (water tanks and associated treatment and plumbing) for vulnerable communities via grants to community linked providers.

This report recommends criteria and process for making Water Resilience Fund grant allocations and makes recommendations for the grant allocations for 2021-22 FY. These recommendations have been made based on the guidance provided by Council at the Council workshop (15 December 2021) on this matter.

Recommendations are made to allocate a total of $477,600, being 95.5% of the first year’s Fund budget to two water resilience improvement projects:

·    Te Rūnanga o Whaingaroa: up to $330,000 for Tūtū Te Wai.

·    Te Kotahitanga E Mahi Kaha Trust: up to $150,000 for Waikotihe Puna and Te Kotahitanga Marae and Community Water Proposal.

These projects will provide water infrastructure including water collection and storage tanks, filters and associated plumbing to improve the water resilience and alleviate water poverty for some 110 households, three marae and a kohanga reo.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Water Resilience Fund - Criteria, Process and LTP Year 1 Allocation’ by Tony Phipps, Contracted Advisor and dated 10 February 2022, be received.

2.         That the Council adopt the criteria and process for making Water Resilience Fund grant allocations as set out and recommended in this report.

3.         That the Council make the following Water Resilience Fund grants for the 2021-22 FY:

·    Te Rūnanga o Whaingaroa: up to $330,000 for Tūtū Te Wai.

·    Te Kotahitanga E Mahi Kaha Trust: up to $150,000 for Waikotihe Puna and Te Kotahitanga Marae and Community Water Proposal.

 

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

As recommended.

Efficient and effective process that makes best use of existing information and learnings from the 2019-20 drought and collective advice from the Te Tai Tokerau Water Resilience Working Group.

 

Some potential projects may be missed due to the process not including a formal public application process.

2

Including a public expressions of interest/application process.

(This option will be re-considered for possible inclusion in the process for future years.)

Likely to get more potential projects.

Work and resources applied to projects that do not receive grants.

A lengthier more costly process.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.

 

Considerations

1.        Environmental Impact

The projects funded by the Water Resilience Fund grants recommended will significantly improve the water resilience and overall resilience of the recipient communities, reduce their need for emergency water supplies and improve their health and wellbeing.

There are no adverse environmental impacts expected from the recommendations.

2.        Community views

The Water Resilience Fund was established through the Long Term Plan 2021-31 public process with community views on the Fund proposal and kaupapa being sorted and considered by Council. The recommended criteria are strongly aligned to the kaupapa of the Fund and the process includes receiving advice from the Te Tai Tokerau Water Resilience Working Group.

3.        Māori impact statement

The Water Resilience Fund was widely supported by Māori through the Long Term Plan process and the most water-short predominantly Māori communities will benefit from the Water Resilience Fund grants.  The grant allocation process includes advice from the Te Tai Tokerau Water Resilience Working Group which includes iwi representatives.

4.        Financial implications

The total of the recommended grants, $477,600, represents 95.5% of the Water Resilience Fund for the 2021-22 FY provided for in the Long Term Plan 2021-31.  The remaining $22,400 (4.5%) and any grant funds not fully utilised will remain in a Water Resilience Fund reserve for re-allocation.

5.        Implementation issues

Once the Council has made the grants, implementation of the individual water resilience improvement projects is the responsibility of the grantees.  While the grantees have been selected as capable providers, this is the first year of the Fund and these are the first projects of this kind.  As the first grants have been made with less than half the FY left and with pandemic impacts including possible material supply delays and shortages, there is some risk that these first projects may not be completed within the FY.  However, as it is intended to make grant payments in advance to enable the grantee/providers to purchase materials which are the largest cost components of these projects, it is likely that all payments of the allocated grants will be made before the end of the FY.

 

6.        Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it has previously been consulted on and provided for in council’s Long Term Plan and/or is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significant to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

7.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The recommendations present no know significant policy or legislation compliance risks for Council.  The Council is making grants to trustworthy and capable providers based on advice from a regional water resilience working group with wide and specialist representation. Responsibility for the management of operational risks and compliance is with the grantees.

Background/Tuhinga

The Water Resilience Fund

As part of its response to the severe 2019-20 drought and the lack of water resilience and water poverty exposed, the Northland Regional Council established a Water Resilience Fund in its Long Term Plan 2021-31.  The Water Resilience Fund provides $500,000 per year to support improving water resilience infrastructure (water tanks and associated treatment and plumbing) for vulnerable communities via grants to community linked providers.

This report recommends the criteria and process for making Water Resilience Fund grant allocations and makes recommendations for the grant allocations for 2021-22 FY.  These recommendations have been made based on the guidance provided by Council at the Council workshop (15 December 2021) on this matter.

Criteria for Eligible Projects to Receive Water Resilience Fund Grants

The following recommended criteria for eligibility for Water Resilience Fund grants were developed to align with the kaupapa of the Fund and on advice from the Te Tai Tokerau Water Resilience Working Group (TTWRWG: has mandate to co-ordinate and advise, with representation from iwi, central and local government):

Criteria:

1.    The project will substantially improve water resilience of a community including households, that are not on an existing public water supply.

2.    The benefitting community is identified as suffering from chronic water shortages and water poverty, and is housing or serving vulnerable people: elders, Kaumatua and Kuia, supporting unwell or disabled whanau, high number of whanau including tamariki.

3.    Inadequate or poor state of water infrastructure is a primary cause of the water shortages.

4.    Deliverability of solutions including infrastructure (tanks, treatment and associated plumbing).

5.    The project provider (grantee) is trustworthy and capable with strong community links.

 

Process for Identifying and Selecting Projects for Water Resilience Fund

 Year 1; 2021-22

The process for identifying and selection of projects for Water Resilience Fund grants for this first year of the Fund used the above criteria and was based on information and learnings from the 2019-20 drought and using the collective knowledge and advice of the Te Tai Tokerau Water Resilience Working Group (TTWRWG) as follows:

1.    Referring to Te Tai Tokerau Water Resilience Working Group for advice and support.

2.    Based on list of potential projects compiled during and following 2019-20 drought response and applying the Criteria for Eligible Projects to Receive Water Resilience Fund Grants.

3.    Identify potential projects and providers* (TTWRWG/NRC).

4.    Seek detailed proposals (NRC).

5.    Evaluate (NRC/TTWRWG) and refine projects (NRC/provider).

6.    Allocate and pay grants (NRC).

*Excluding projects or components of projects with, or more closely aligned to, other funding eg. Puna Wai Ora (Te Hiku) or Kainga Rua (TPK).

Years 2-3; 2022-24

Before considering potential projects for grants in years 2 and 3 of the Fund it is proposed to review the above process and advise on and recommend any improvements. The review will include the consideration of the merits of adding a public expressions of interest/application process. It is proposed to seek advice from TTWRWG on improving the process and report to Council for consideration, then proceed to use the revised process to provide recommendations for allocating the grants for years 2 and 3 before the start of year 2 (July 2022).

 

Water Resilience Fund Grant Allocations for 2021-22.

Following the above process it is recommended that Water Resilience Fund grants for 2021-22 are made to:

Te Rūnunga o Whaiangaroa, Tūtū Te Wai project: up to $327,600 (ex GST).

Project summary:

•     Improving water resilience to some eight Whaingaroa communities, including 95 homes and two marae and benefitting 350 people.

•     Prioritisation based on Te Rūnanga O Whaingaroa and connected social services data and knowledge of community.

•     Providing tanks, water treatment and associated plumbing and minor repairs.

•     Provider: Te Rūnanga O Whaingaroa, a mandated Iwi organisation, experienced and trusted community services provider with good project management capability and access to contractors.

•     Project cost: Total $327,600 (ex GST), proposed in three tranches.

 

 

 

Te Kotahitanga E Mahi Kaha Trust: Waikotihe Puna and Te Kotahitanga Marae and Community Water Proposal: up to $150,000 (ex GST).

Project Summary:

•     Improving water resilience to a community immediately SW of Kaikohe, including 15 homes and a marae, church and kohanga reo.

•     Prioritisation based on local knowledge of community and participation in the 2019-20 drought response.

•     Providing tanks, water treatment and associated plumbing and minor repairs.

•     Provider: Te Kotahitanga E Mahi Kaha Trust, experienced and trusted community services provider with recent water tank project experience and access to contractors.

•     Project cost: Estimate $150,000 (ex GST).

 

The recommended grants total $477,600 (95.5%) of the 2021-22 Fund, leaving $22,400 (4.5%) as yet unallocated.  A further recommendation will be made on the allocation of the remaining amount, either for a grant to a small-scale project being investigated, or to put in reserve to be added to the following year grants.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.4

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Draft NRC feedback - Discussion document on resource management system reform

From:

Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services, on 09 February 2022

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The government has released a consultation document seeking feedback on proposals for reform of the resource management system. The consultation follows on from the select committee report on the exposure draft of the Natural and Built Environment Bill. The consultation document sets out the ‘direction of travel’ for some elements of the reforms, including regional spatial strategies, the national planning framework and the planning and decision-making system. It does not cover the Strategic Planning or Climate Change Acts in any detail.

 

A draft submission is attached for consideration by council (Attachment 1). The draft has been provided to Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) non-elected members for comment.  

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Draft NRC feedback - Discussion document on resource management system reform’ by Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and dated 2 February 2022, be received.

2.         That council authorise the draft submission and that it be lodged on or before 28 February 2022.

3.         That the GM – Environmental Services be authorised to make minor changes for readability and formatting prior to lodgement.

4.         That the submission be signed by Chair Penny Smart on behalf of council.

 

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

That council does not provide feedback on the reform proposals

None

Government does not receive the views of council on the reform proposals.

Council is perceived to have little interest in the reforms and is not representing the interests of the region.

2

That council does provide feedback on the reform proposals.

Government receives the views of council on the reform proposals.

Council is perceived to have an active interest in the reforms and to be representing regional interests.

None

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 2.

Considerations

1.        Environmental Impact

While there is no direct environmental impact from council lodging a submission, the eventual legislation will have a significant impact on how our environment is managed.

2.        Community views

Community views on the reform proposals are likely to vary widely, however council providing feedback to government is not likely to materially affect / impact communities. Council feedback is likely to better ensure regional circumstances are considered in future government decisions.

3.        Māori impact statement

Māori views on the reform proposals are likely to vary widely, however council providing feedback to government is not likely to materially affect / impact them directly. A draft of the council submission was circulated to non-elected members of Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party for comment. Council has considered these comments in developing the submission.

4.        Financial implications

There are no known financial implications of council providing feedback to government on resource management system reform proposals. The activity is provided for in councils Long Term Plan.

5.        Implementation issues

There are no implementation issues associated with this decision.  There will be significant implementation and financial impacts from the eventual resulting legislative reform however it is too early to know with certainty as to what these may be and how best to plan and budget for them.

 

6.        Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

 

7.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

There are no known policy, risk or legislative compliance issues associated with this decision.

Background/Tuhinga

In November 2021 the government released a targeted consultation document seeking feedback on proposals for reform of the resource management system. The consultation follows on from the select committee report on the exposure draft of the Natural and Built Environment Bill. The consultation document sets out the ‘direction of travel’ for some elements of the reforms, including regional spatial strategies, the national planning framework and the planning and key aspects of the decision-making system. It does not cover the Strategic Planning or Climate Change Acts in any detail.

Part one of the consultation document sets out the context for the reform of the resource management system and provides an overview of its key elements, including the objectives and the scope of new legislation proposed. This section also provides high level commentary on other reforms underway, including those related to local government and three waters. Commitments to uphold Treaty settlements, takutai Moana arrangements and protect Māori rights and interests in freshwater are also made by the government.  

 

Part two of the consultation document describes at a high level:

·    An overview of how the new system will work and the new legislation proposed (the Strategic Planning Act and the Natural and Built Environments Act) – it is effectively silent on the Climate Change Act.

·    How the main elements of the system will work together

 

It also sets out more detailed reform proposals relating to:

·    The National Planning Framework (NPF)

·    Regional spatial strategies (RSS)

·    Natural and built environment plans (NBA plans)

·    The relationship between the NPF, RSS and NBA plans

·    Joint committees and their role in RSS and NBA plan making

·    Consenting, compliance monitoring and enforcement

·    National monitoring and system oversight

 

Part two of the document describes some of the future roles and responsibilities for local government, Māori and central government. It also states that the government is considering appropriate funding mechanisms.   

The future resource management system and the reforms represent the most significant redesign of Aotearoa NZ’s planning system in decades. It also coincides with reform of the local government system and three waters which are interrelated.

The implications are significant and will materially affect how resource management will occur and the future functions and obligations of council. Staff therefore recommend council provide feedback to government on the proposals – a draft submission is attached for consideration by council. The draft has been circulated to non-elected members of TTMAC for comment in accordance with the council decision to engage with TTMAC on this topic prior to making submissions to government.

The consultation closes 28 February 2022.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Draft NRC feedback on Our future resource management system (9 Feb 2022)   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 7.4

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.5

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Proposed changes to the NES Drinking water - Council submission

From:

Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services, on 10 February 2022

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

In January of this year, the government (Ministry for the Environment) released a consultation document outlining potential changes to the National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water 2007 (NES-DW). The NES-DW currently applies restrictions on the activities regional councils can authorise or permit upstream of source water takes (including land uses, bed disturbance, water takes and discharges) to protect specified drinking water sources (registered drinking-water supply that provides no fewer than 501 people with drinking water for not less than 60 days each calendar year).

 

The government is proposing changes to the NES-DW, largely as a response to the Havelock North drinking water contamination inquiry and to align provisions with the Water Services Act 2021 (WSA). The changes include requirements for regional councils to map three source water risk management areas (SWRMA) for all registered drinking water takes and apply controls on ‘high-risk’ activities. The NES-DW would apply to all drinking water sources that require registration under the WSA – all suppliers other than domestic self-suppliers (i.e. any drinking supply that supplies more than one dwelling).

 

The proposals have significant implications for council and landowners. The consultation closes on 6 March 2022. Staff recommend council lodge a submission on the proposals, however a draft was not able to be prepared by agenda deadlines. It is therefore recommended that council authorise the submission to be approved under delegated authority. 

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Proposed changes to the NES Drinking water - Council submission’ by Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and dated 3 February 2022, be received.

2.         That a draft submission be circulated to councillors and TTMAC for comment prior to the draft being finalised.

3.         That council authorise the draft submission to be approved, under delegated authority to Chair Penny Smart, prior to being lodged with the Ministry for the Environment on or before 6 March 2022. 

 

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Council does not submit on the proposed changes to the NES-DW

No staff time required

The government does not have access to the views of council on the proposals and their potential implications.

Council is potentially seen not to have an interest in the changes or is not representing Northland’s interests.

2

Council submits on the proposed changes to the NES-DW

The government receives the views of council on the proposals and their potential implications.

Council is seen to have an interest in the changes and to be representing Northland’s interests.

Staff time required to draft a submission.

3

Council provides input into submissions by other parties.

Less staff time required.

Northland’s particular circumstances / issues are unlikely to be reflected as strongly.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 2

Considerations

1.    Environmental Impact

While the decision to lodge a submission will not have a material impact on the environment, the eventual NES-DW will have a material impact on the environment, and it is for that reason that staff are recommended that council should lodge a submission.

2.        Community views

Communities are known to have a strong interest in drinking water supply, although views are likely to vary across the region. However, the decision to lodge a submission to government on the matter will not have direct material impacts on communities.

3.    Māori impact statement

Māori are known to have an interest in the management of drinking water supplies and all aspects of water. The council decision to lodge a submission to government on the matter will not have direct material impact on Māori.  Council has however resolved to seek the views of Māori through engagement with Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) when providing input into government proposals relating to freshwater. Staff will therefore seek input from either MTAG or TTMAC members in developing the draft submission. 

4.    Financial implications

There are no known financial implications associated with eh decision.

5.    Implementation issues

The are no significant implementation issues associated with the development and lodgement of a council submission.

 

6.    Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is provided for in council’s Long-Term Plan and is part of council’s day to day activities.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.”

 

7.    Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

There are no known policy, risk management or legislative compliance issues associated with this decision.

Background/Tuhinga

In January 2022 the government (Ministry for the Environment) released a consultation document outlining potential changes to the National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water 2007 (NES-DW). The existing NES-DW requires regional councils to identify certain activities ‘upstream’ of an ‘abstraction point’ and then determine whether those activities are likely to introduce or increase the concentration of contaminants in treated drinking water, beyond what is allowable in the Drinking Water Standards NZ (DWSNZ). Under the current NES-DW regional councils cannot grant water or discharge permits and cannot permit certain activities[1] upstream of a source water abstraction point if the activity is likely to impact a water supplier’s ability to meet the DWSNZ after that water has been treated. These provisions apply to source water that provides no fewer than 501 people with drinking water for not less than 60 days each calendar year. A feature of the current NES-DW is that the discretion is largely left to regional councils to apply through resource consents and regional rules.

The government is proposing changes to the NES-DW, largely as a response to the Havelock North drinking water contamination inquiry and to align provisions with the Water Services Act 2021 (WSA). The changes proposed include:

·    requirements for regional councils to map three source water ‘risk management’ areas (SWRMA) around all currently registered drinking water takes.

·    the revised NES-DW would apply controls on ‘high-risk’ activities in each of these SWRMA

·    the revised NES-DW would apply to all drinking water sources that require registration under the WSA – that is all suppliers other than domestic self-suppliers (i.e. any drinking supply that supplies more than one dwelling).

·    A staged approach to registration (and mapping SWRMA) and associated activity controls is proposed in accordance with WSA registration deadlines (4 years for currently unregistered takes).

 

Source water risk management areas

The three SWRMA are:

SWRMA 1 is the immediate area around the source water take where there is an immediate risk of contamination because there is very little time to respond to any contamination before it enters the water supply. Most activities will be restricted in this area.

For rivers, it includes the river and its bed 1,000 metres upstream and 100 metres downstream of the intake, extending 5 metres into land from the river edge.

For lakes, it encompasses the lake and its bed within a 500-metre radius of the intake, extending 5 metres into land from the lake edge.

For aquifers, it encompasses land within a 5-metre radius around the intake (bore head).

 

SWRMA 2 is a larger area where activities need to be managed, to mitigate more medium-term risks of contamination. The size will vary because it is based on the time it takes for water to flow to the source.

For rivers, it is the river and bed from where water travels to the intake within an 8-hour period.

For lakes, it is the entire lake area, extending landward 100 metres, and includes tributaries (being the area from where water travels to the lake within an 8-hour period).

For aquifers, it is the land area above where groundwater travels to the intake (bore) within a 1-year period, to a maximum of 2.5 kilometres.

SWRMA 3 is the entire catchment area for the source water. Persistent contaminants and cumulative effects of all activities within the catchment are the management focus in this area, and they are considered to be appropriately managed under the RMA. The proposed amendments to the NES-DW aim to clarify that consenting decisions must address source water risks.

Regional councils can use a ‘bespoke’ method to map SWRMA but this is to be approved by the relevant minister.

 

Proposed controls in SWRMA

The NES-DW would impose controls on ‘high-risk’ activities in each SWRMA with the most restrictions imposed in SWRMA1, including:

·    land uses including drilling of bores and earthworks over vulnerable aquifers

·    (RMA section 9)

·    uses of the beds of lakes and rivers (RMA section 13)

·    all restrictions on water (RMA section 14)

·    discharges, excluding to air (RMA section 15)

·    Controls on application of herbicides.

 

These controls are very broad and could restrict a number of activities currently permitted in regional plans – such as use of herbicides within 5m of riverbanks.

Controls in SWMRA2 are proposed to include discharges to water and earthworks over vulnerable aquifers and that all consents are to consider effects on source water.

No specific controls are proposed in SWRMA3 but impacts on source water must be considered.

 

 

Potential implications:

It is difficult to assess the costs and benefits of the proposal given:

·    The location of all drinking source water takes that need to be registered under the WSA is unknown (but likely numerous sites)

·    The exact details of the s9 (land use), s13 (use of beds of lakes and rivers), 14 (taking, damming, diversion of water) and s15 (discharges) activities to be controlled is unclear – for example would SWMRA1 controls restrict stock drinking water takes, construction of stock crossings or stormwater discharges.  

 

The discussion document tis available here: https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/new-dw-consultation-document.pdf

Staff are still assessing the proposals and a draft submission was not able to be provided at agenda deadlines. Council has endorsed engagement with TTMAC on council input / submissions into government proposals related to freshwater which has yet to occur. Staff would also like to discuss the changes to the NES-DW with district council colleagues.

It is therefore recommended that council authorise the draft being approved under delegated authority to Chair Penny Smart prior to it being lodged with the Ministry for the Environment on or before 6 March 2022.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.6

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Maritime Safety Management System (SMS)

From:

Jim Lyle, Regional Harbourmaster

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Victoria Harwood, Pou Tiaki Hapori - GM Community Resilience, on 11 January 2022

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

A paper was put to the Audit and Risk subcommittee of the risks associated with shipping on Northlands’s coastline and harbours, and to seek the support of council for the continued use and ongoing implementation of the nationally recognised port and harbour safety code. (The code.)

Safety management systems are in place, and risks are being currently actively managed in Northland in line with recommendations from the code. This is a live system, operating in a dynamic and ever-changing environment. As an example, in the last year cruise ships have been banned, the refinery has announced closure, and there has been an increase in large container ships arriving at Northport.

The audit and risk committee agreed with the recommendations within the paper as follows:

1.    That the Audit and Risk subcommittee note the risks posed by shipping, and the management of these risks by safety management systems under the port and harbour safety code.

2.    That the Audit and Risk subcommittee recommend to council that the port and harbour safety code is fully supported by the council.

This report seeks the written support of the council for the ongoing adoption of the code, and associated safety management systems. Northland is due to be peer reviewed early 2022, and the support of the council will illustrate Northland is taking the steps needed to protect its coastline.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Maritime Safety Management System (SMS)’ by Jim Lyle, Regional Harbourmaster and dated 11 January 2022, be received.

2.         That the Council note the risks posed by shipping, and the management of these risks by Safety Management Systems under the Port and Harbour Safety Code.

3.         That the Council fully support the Port and Harbour Safety Code.

 

 

Options

An important part of the code compliance is buy-in by all the parties involved. The active management of safety cannot be undertaken effectively by token paperwork, it must be whole heartedly supported by senior management of the ports and regional councils. By noting this report, and confirming support for the code, the regional council will be playing its part in a nationally recognised port and harbour safety system.

 

 

 

 

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Support the recommendations

Maintains the risk management level

None noted

2

Ignore the recommendations

No advantage

Illustrates lack of support for safety on the coast

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.

Considerations

1.        Environmental Impact

This decision will increase the ability of Council and the region to proactively respond to the risks of shipping on the coast and in Northland harbours, now and in the future, by supporting the use of Safety Management Systems to manage the risks.

2.        Community views

The community and Māori expect the regional council to manage the risks posed by shipping.

3.        Māori impact statement

There are no known impacts on Māori which are different from other users.

4.        Financial implications

There are no financial implications, this work is planned and resourced.

5.        Implementation issues

This work is planned and resourced.

 

6.        Significance and engagement

This work does not trigger the Significance and Engagement policy.

7.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The risks posed by shipping are noted in the Council Risk Register, and currently sit at number 17 in the rating of risks.

From 2001, the then-Maritime Safety Authority, now Maritime NZ, started implementing a risk-based approach to port and harbour safety and introduced shortly after the Port and Harbour Safety Code, based on a UK safety system that was seen to work, and required each port to manage their risks in a consistent and formal manner.

Northland Regional Council quickly adopted the code and implemented a Safety Management System (SMS) for Whangārei and the Bay of Islands, the two harbours that catered for commercial-sized vessels requiring pilotage.

Initially the SMS was audited by Maritime NZ, however their resourcing for this lapsed, and the gap was filled by a peer review system shared by the Regional Councils and the Ports with a representative attending from Maritime NZ. Northland’s next peer review will be in early 2022.

 

In summary, the SMS uses a risk management approach to manage the risks of shipping on our coastline and harbours.

Support and use of the Code is voluntary, however if/when a serious incident occurs in a port, and best practice has not been undertaken, then the potential is for Council to carry the responsibility for inaction. Council, and the Harbourmaster functions, are insured for a significant sum, and the insurance comfort level for the Council factors in the active Safety Management Systems in place. 

 

Background/Tuhinga

Northland has an extensive coastline, several ports, and harbours, including two used for commercial shipping and cruise ships (Whangārei and the Bay of Islands), and responsibility for waters out to 12 nautical miles.

New Zealand legislation covering coastal waters for maritime activities is covered by the Maritime Transport Act 1994. The aim of the act is set out in Section 1 as follows:

 

An Act—

(a)

to continue Maritime New Zealand; and

(b)

to enable the implementation of New Zealand’s obligations under international maritime agreements; and

(c)

to ensure that participants in the maritime transport system are responsible for their actions; and

(d)

to consolidate and amend maritime transport law; and

(e)

[Repealed]

(f)

to protect the marine environment; and

(g)

to continue, or enable, the implementation of obligations on New Zealand under various international conventions relating to pollution of the marine environment; and

(h)

to regulate maritime activities in New Zealand and New Zealand waters; and

(i)

to regulate maritime activities and the marine environment in the exclusive economic zone and on the continental shelf as permitted under international law

 

Regional councils’ responsibilities are set down in section 33C:

 

33C Functions of regional councils

For the purpose of ensuring maritime safety in their regions, regional councils may regulate—

(a)

the ports, harbours, and waters in their regions; and

(b)

maritime-related activities in their regions.

 

Unfortunately, maritime safety is not defined in the Act, however regional councils have long taken responsibility for navigational safety and the environmental protection of the coast, and the Act does give the regional council the powers to appoint harbourmasters with clearly defined powers to carry out their role.

 

Northland Regional Council has a well-resourced Maritime team and Harbourmasters in comparison to most regions, and this is justified given the wide variety of coastal activity from tankers and container ships, large cruise liners, fishing ports, and one of the most popular recreational boating coasts in New Zealand, within a days’ sail of Auckland, holding half the population of which a large number own a vessel.

 

The Harbourmaster’s team consists of 10 staff, plus one contract Deputy Commercial Harbourmaster based at Marsden Point. Apart from two admin staff, the rest of the team all hold maritime qualifications to an appropriate level. This team actively manages 2,800 moorings, 300 aids to navigation, recreational boating safety, oil spill response and training.

 

Usually, the Bay of Islands cruise ships are also managed in-house by the Harbourmaster, making this a simpler management system due to the limited parties involved.

 

Whangārei is more complex due to the multiple agencies involved. There are four main facilities: Northport, Refining NZ, Golden Bay Cement, and Port Whangārei. The marine services are supplied by a separate towage company NorthTugz, who up until recently were mainly funded by a collective of the oil majors via the refinery. With the refinery closing, the long-term funding of North Tugz is not assured, making investment in new plant such as tugs and pilot vessels unlikely in the short term.

 

Northport plays an active part in the Safety Management Systems managing the ports aids to navigation, the local port information services (harbour radio) and owning an onsite ship simulator.

To add to the complexity Northport is part owned by Port of Tauranga and Marsden Holdings Ltd (which is 54% owned by NRC) and NorthTugz are 50% owned by Northport and Ports of Auckland.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.7

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Solar Energy Expansion at Water Street Whangarei

From:

Phil Heatley, Strategic Projects and Facilities Manager

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 10 February 2022

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The Chief Executive and Property Team recommend that the solar energy generation at council’s Water Street property be expanded beyond their current generation capacity. This item seeks approval to undertake the work with funding from the Equalisation Reserve.

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Solar Energy Expansion at Water Street Whangarei’ by Phil Heatley, Strategic Projects and Facilities Manager and dated 8 February 2022, be received.

2.         That up to $40,000 + GST in funds be drawn the Equalisation Reserve for further provision of solar power generation at 36 Water Street, Whangarei.

 

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Immediately further invest in solar expansion at Water Street HQ.

Both grid electricity costs and the cost of the installation of a solar alternative are likely to rise in future.

Returns an operational saving in the near term once investment payback is achieved.

Clearly demonstrates council’s practical commitment to climate change mitigation.

Funds will be required from the Equalisation Reserve which might be better directed elsewhere.


 

2

Do not further invest in solar expansion at this stage.

Funds from the Equalisation Reserve can be directed elsewhere.

 

Council can take time to measure the benefits of solar power provision before making a further commitment.

The impacts of Covid and surging inflation is resulting in price hikes, delaying implementation will result in longer payback periods.

 

Council loses an opportunity to further mitigate climate change though its operations.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1 to immediately further invest in solar expansion at Water Street HQ.

 

Considerations

1.        Environmental impact

The extension of solar power generation at council owner-occupied facilities improves the environmental footprint status of our activities and reduces grid-electricity costs.

 

2.        Community views

Regarding further solar power investment, the wider community/ratepayers are not significantly affected and then positively as council prudently invests in technology which returns an operational saving in the near term and demonstrates our commitment to the environment and climate change mitigation.

 

3.        Māori impact statement

Council previously consulted on the managing of its property portfolio in successive Annual and Long Term Plans.  There were no specific concerns raised from Māori or Iwi groups in respect of proposals.  The proposed investments have no specific impact on Māori. 

 

4.        Financial implications

The investment of $40,000 + GST is recommended to come from the Equalisation Reserve. This is because Water Street is a non-income generating investment property. The investment aligns with councillors’ aspirations for investment, ensuing council contributes positively and measurably toward climate change mitigation.

 

It is recommended that up to $40,000 of funding is provided from the Equalisation Reserve for the solar expansion.  It is noted that with this funding commitment, and others, that the reserve balance will be drawn down to a forecast closing balance of -$26,396 in 2026/27 if the $648,915 of 2020/21 IIF gains that have been recapitalised into the reserve are not included (refer attachment 1, note that the $40,000 for the solar expansion is not included in attachment 1).  It would be prudent to treat the $648,915 of recapitalised gains as part of the overall Equalisation Reserve budget, so there is capacity within the reserve to fund unforeseen and unbudgeted future forest activities (i.e. storm damage repair).  It is recommended that the closing balance of the reserve in any given year should not fall below $250,000 to enable sufficient funding for unforeseen and unbudgeted future forest activities.

 

5.        Implementation issues

There are no implementation issues with this decision.

 

6.        Significance and engagement

The decision to further invest in an investment property does not trigger the significance test as the ability to manage properties is specifically provided for in the Investment Strategy.

 

7.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The receiving of this report is provided for in council’s Investment Strategy.

 

 

Background/Tuhinga

At the 14 December meeting, council approved up to $125,000 + GST in investment be drawn from the Property Reinvestment Fund for further provision of solar power generation at the Kaipara Service Centre, Dargaville. The KSC is a rent generating investment property that is currently being constructed with PRF funding.

 

The decision to invest up to $40,000 + GST for further provision of solar power generation at 36 Water Street, Whangarei was delayed until the February 2022 meeting pending further consideration of funding options.

 

Water Street HQ solar array

The current solar array at Water Street provides 20kW and has been operational since April 2015 (~6.5 years), producing approximately 180,000 kWh of electricity. The array was designed to produce approximately 15% of the weekday demand and nearly 100% of the weekend demand during daylight hours. There are two ways of looking at its financial benefit:

 

1.    The current array has saved around $23,000 in electricity charges over its years of operation IF no electric car charging is considered.  Given council spent $51,400 for the turn-key system, the payback period equates to just over 14 years. 

2.    The current array produces enough electricity to drive ~200,000 EV kms each year.  If council calculates an offset of 200,000 petrol km with EV km our electric bill would stay the same, however we would save approximately $28,000 per year not buying petrol, yielding a payback on solar of just under two years. 

 

Water Street (current)

 

The Property Team recommend extending the Water Street HQ solar array by around 13kW, which will provide almost 25% of the weekday demand. This extension is limited only by suitable roof space available and financial outlay.

 

Such an extension will require up to $40,000 + GST in investment and, with an annual saving of grid electricity of $4,900 pa, the payback period will be around 8.2 years, less if depreciation is taken into account (note that electricity price increase broadly offset finance costs).

 

The financing is recommended to come from the Equalisation Reserve rather than the PRF. This is because the PRF is for the acquisition or redevelopment of income generating investment properties. Water Street is a non-income generating property, council does not pay itself rents for Water Street and therefore takes on capital and maintenance costs.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Equalisation Reserve Balance   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 7.7

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.8

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Budget approval for CEO recruitment

From:

Beryl Steele, Human Resources Manager

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 17 January 2022

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The recruitment costs for the CEO position are unbudgeted and cannot be accommodated in the general HR recruitment budget.  It is recommended that the budget for this expense comes from the Equalisation Reserve.  In addition, as the recruitment company fees and other potential recruitment costs will be above $70,000 this unbudgeted expenditure needs to be approved by council. 

 

Recommendation(s)

1.         That the report ‘Budget approval for CEO recruitment’ by Beryl Steele, Human Resources Manager and dated 17 January 2022, be received.

2.         That council approve budget of $100,000 to pay for recruitment expenses associated with the recruitment of the new CEO.

3.         That this budget comes from the Equalisation Reserve.

 

Options

 

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Approve the funding

Allows council to recruit for a new CEO

Financial cost to council will be around $90,000 to $100,000

2

Do not approve funding

 

Unable to fulfil contract with Sheffield for the recruitment of the new CEO.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1

 

Considerations

1.        Environmental Impact

There are no environmental impacts.

2.        Community views

No community views are known.

3.        Māori impact statement

Pita Tipene, TTMAC representative on the CEO recruitment panel, was involved with the decision to go with Sheffield.  Part of the decision to go with Sheffield Search was because they took into account the needs of Māori in Northland.

4.        Financial implications

Council currently has no specific budget to pay for the recruitment costs. The cost of recruitment is a maximum of 20% of the gross salary, plus advertising and additional costs specific to the recruitment of the CEO which may also include relocation expenses.  The final potential cost is likely to be between $90,000 and $100,000.

It is recommended that up to $100,000 of funding is provided from the Equalisation Reserve for the CEO recruitment expenses.  It is noted that with this funding commitment, and others, that the reserve balance will be drawn down to a forecast closing balance of -$26,396 in 2026/27 if the $648,915 of 2020/21 IIF gains that have been recapitalised into the reserve are not included (refer attachment 1).  It would be prudent to treat the $648,915 of recapitalised gains as part of the overall Equalisation Reserve budget, so there is capacity within the reserve to fund unforeseen and unbudgeted future forest activities (i.e. storm damage repair).  It is recommended that the closing balance of the reserve in any given year should not fall below $250,000 to enable sufficient funding for unforeseen and unbudgeted future forest activities.

5.        Implementation issues

If option 1 is adopted there should be no implementation issues.  If we do not go with option 1 additional budget will need to be found from other savings within the organisation otherwise we will need to terminate the contract with Sheffield Search.

6.        Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision (to approve unbudgeted expenditure of $100,000) is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it does not trigger any of the matters or thresholds in the policy, namely:

Ÿ It does not involve setting or amending rates

Ÿ It does not involve a strategic asset

Ÿ It is not a change to a level of service

Ÿ There is no legislative requirement to consult

Ÿ It is not substantially inconsistent with existing policies, strategies or decisions

Ÿ It does not incur high capital or operational expenditure, or a financial transaction, with a value greater than $750,000.

Ÿ The decision is reversible, does not have a high degree of risk, and the significance of the decision is largely known

Ÿ The decision will not have a large impact on a moderate number of people or a moderate impact on many people

Ÿ There are unlikely to be large divisions in community interest or high levels of prior public interest.

 

7.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The decision is consistent with the Delegations Manual which requires council approval for unbudgeted expenditure over $70,000. 

 

The risks of making the decision far outweigh the risks of not adopting the option to use budget from the Equalisation Reserve.

 

Background/Tuhinga

The current Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement expires on 30 September 2022.  A CEO Recruitment sub-committee made up of councillors and advisors was set up to work through the recruitment of a replacement CEO.  As part of this the sub-committee and advisors decided to contract Sheffield to assist in the recruitment.  A contract, including costs, was agreed and signed. 

Based on this decision the council needs to now find appropriate budget to pay for these costs.  All costs will be coded to a CEO related recruitment cost code.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Equalisation Reserve Balance   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 7.8

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 8.1

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Health and Safety Report

From:

Kelcie Mills, Health and Safety Advisor

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 09 February 2022

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

This report is to inform the council of the activity in health and safety for the months of December 2021 and January 2022.  An overview/summary of the activities include:

·        There was a reduction in the completed inductions of new staff to 67%.

·        The ‘Working with contractors’ and ‘COVID-19 pandemic’ risks have been reviewed and risk scores increased.

·        Scoping has begun on a health and safety audit which will focus on high-risk processes.

·        There was an increase in hazard related events, and a decrease in injury/incident related events.

·        A new health and safety committee has been elected and will have their first meeting in February 2022.

·        Training included wader and water safety, and health and safety investigations.

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Health and Safety Report’ by Kelcie Mills, Health and Safety Advisor and dated 28 January 2022, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

1.        Health and safety performance

Table 1: Health and safety performance lead and lag indicators

*Based on calendar year

Table 1 outlines the key lead and lag indicators in health and safety. 

·        The current health and safety advisor is leaving council in February. While recruitment is taking place, the health and safety programme delivery will be reduced to the required activities such as incident management. Critical tasks which need to take place in the interim will be outsourced.

·        No contractors were identified as having completed the contractor health and safety pre-engagement process in December or January. This is of concern as there may have been contractors engaged in this period without completing, or correctly submitting the health and safety information. A health and safety audit focusing on high-risk processes, including contractors and traffic management, is set to be undertaken this financial year. It is important to first identify how many contractors there are currently, to plan and prepare for this audit.

·        The health and safety inductions completed has decreased over the past three months and now sits at 67%. Many new staff are in teams who do not have a designated health and safety representative from the restructure. To resolve this, catch up inductions have been to cover these inductions until suitable health and safety representatives are designated to the teams. Training is identified to take place in February for new representatives.

 

2.        Risk management

The top risks are:

Note: The working with contractors, and COVID-19 pandemic risk scores have increased now both sit as 1st equal. The top risks are identified by the residual risk scores. There risks are the highest after all controls have been put in place.

The risk score is between 1 and 25.

 

 

Risk Updates

·        The ‘working with contactors’ risk has had an increase in risk score to reflect two severe incidents which occurred in the latter part of 2021. It has been recognised from these incidents, that contact managers are not trained enough to properly assess the health and safety risk and supporting evidence for their contractors at the pre-engagement phase. A scoping activity is being undertaken to identify what needs to be done to address this effectively. This will include an audit, updating processes and making training available as part of the contractor management framework. This is planned to be undertaken within this financial year and is included into the handover notes for the next health and safety advisor to lead. External advisors have been identified to assist in reviewing contractor documentation for high-risk work in the interim.

·        The traffic management plan has been distributed to staff and internal educative sessions are being held with staff who are affected by the changes. There are staff who are yet to be trained and obtain licences before undertaking any work in the corridor. Compliance checks need to be undertaken during this financial year to ensure its operating as its designed to. This is included into the handover notes for the next health and safety advisor to lead.

·        The stress survey was undertaken in November 2021. The report with analysed data will be completed in February and included into the March report. There has been very positive feedback on the three additional council days over the summer break.

·        The workload risk has had some initial work done to assess the extent and causes of issue. The workplan has been tasked to the wellbeing group to finalise and put into an action plan.

 

COVID-19

·        The COVID-19 pandemic risk score has been increased to reflect the increase of cases in New Zealand and Northland, and the governments estimated increase of infections/cases from February.

·        The consultation from the covid-19 role-based risk assessments is almost completed. New roles will now have a risk assessment completed before being advertised to identify the risk.

·        The covid management team (CMT) and executive leadership team (ELT) have developed a response using our business continuity plan to keep our staff safe, and operational through the omicron variants outbreak. Steps one and two in this response are:

o   Requiring vaccination passes for everyone on NRC premises

o   Separating critical staff into bubbles so that staff who are required as backup will not be in the office at the same time from February 8th, 2022.

 


 

3.        Injuries, incidents, and hazards

Figure 1: Number of hazard and injury related events for previous 12 months

Figure 1 shows an increase in hazard related events, and a decrease in injury/incident related events for January. With an increased number of staff on leave in December and January, the lower number of overall incidents is not surprising.

The trend for incidents reported as at the mid-way point of the financial year is shown in figure 2. This data shows a larger number of hazard related events being report to date, which is positive as staff are recognising issues and reporting them before they become incidents or injuries.

Figure 2: Trend of hazard and injury related events reported by financial year

 

 


 

Events reported

Figure 3: Top event types for previous 12 months

Events of interest

Note: the events of interest only detail high risk events, or events which affect large groups of people.

·        A worker was bitten by a dog that was bought into work by another staff member. The worker was petting the dog and was moving away when the dog nipped their face leaving a small abrasion. The worker was taken to white cross and given antibiotics and their last tetanus vaccine was checked. The manager was informed of the situation and workers have been made aware that dogs are not allowed in the building unless approved by a GM.

·        There were two incidents of poor driving reported by members of the public. Both instances were addressed with the staff members involved. The E-road (car tracking) reports were tracked to check if any speeding or other poor driving could be identified and, in both cases, no speeding had been identified.

·        There were three reports of headaches and eye strain, from either lighting or the new single screen monitors. Lights have been removed, and the IT team has been assisting in adjusting display settings and monitor placement to support the staff.

·        A worker fell over a concrete block while manually carrying a pallet at Union East street. The worker event raises an ongoing concern of the pallet stacker not being capable of travelling on the gravel, and the potential need for a forklift. The review on forklifts continues with input from the health and safety committee and workers involved.

·        There were two incidents with aggressive customers. The first was over the phone to reception, and the second was a compliance officer confronted with an unhappy and intimidating member of the public when investigating an environmental incident. The location was added to the people and places on interest register, and the worker was offered support. The worker identified that their situational safety training had been useful, with the skills applied.

 

4.        Health and safety strategy work programme

Leadership

·        There has been a health and safety committee re-election because of the restructure. The members are familiarising themselves with the health and safety strategy and subsequent action plans.

Communication and engagement

·        The health and safety spotlight has focused on providing the updates on the traffic management plan, contractor management and the importance of correct pre-engagement processes, vehicles and Garmin device updates, and offering skin protection courses to staff.

Learning and development

·        Training which took place in December was wader and water safety training, and health and safety investigations training.

Continual improvement

·        The health and safety strategy work has been shared to the new health and safety committee members to identify which action plans are the high priority ones.

 

 

 

5.        Legislative changes

Nil

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 8.2

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Chair's Report to Council

From:

Penny Smart, Chair

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer, on

 

Purpose of Report

This report is to receive information from the Chair on meetings/events attended, and correspondence sent for the month of December 2021 – January 2022.

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Chair's Report to Council’ by Penny Smart, Chair and dated 10 February 2022, be received.

 

Meetings/events attended

During this period, I attended the following meetings/events/functions:

·    Meetings attended with the council’s CEO, Malcolm Nicolson:

•     Kaipara Moana Remediation Maurikura Dedication opening

•     Local Government NZ Regional Sector meeting

•     Northland Mayoral Meeting

·    Other Meetings:

•     Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited Meeting with Murray Jagger

•     Regular meetings with Mayor Jake Smith for Northland Mayors and Chair

•     COVID Protection Framework webinar

•     Trifecta (NEMA) Workshop – Governance (Local and Regional Authorities)

 

Correspondence

During December and January I sent out the following correspondence:

Date

Addressed To

Subject

10.12.2021

Hon David Parker, Minister for the Environment, and Oceans and Fisheries

Hon Hon Kiritapu Allan, Minister of Conservation

Hon Nanaia Mahuta, Minister for Local Government

High Court decisions on jurisdiction of NES-F and natural wetlands in the CMA

20.12.2021

Hon Dr David Clark

Minister for the Digital Economy and Communications

Digital Connectivity in Taitokerau Northland

21.12.2021

Hon Andrew Little, Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations

Kaipara Moana Treaty settlement negotiations

10.01.2022

Mark Donnelly, Regional Software Holdings Limited

Northland Regional Council – Alternate Director

19.01.2022

Rt Hon Damien O’Connor

C/ Ministry for Primary Industries

Northland Regional Council

Biosecurity Operational Report

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 8.3

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Chief Executive’s Report to Council

From:

Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer, on

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Chief Executive’s Report to Council’ by Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer and dated 20 January 2022, be received.

 

8.3.1   Highlights

Whangarei Heads High Value Area

Success!  Owhiwa Landcare (near Pārua Bay) are proudly celebrating a huge milestone – the hatch of the first known kiwi chick to released kiwi in the area.  Named ‘Kotahi’ (‘The First’) it is hoped this is the first of many chicks to come now that kiwi released into the area have begun breeding successfully thanks to years of intensive predator control and great dog control by local landowners and hunters.

 

Kotahi nestling in front of
 his father Chookie

.

The milestone was reported in local media here:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/news/northland-kiwi-conservationists-celebrate-christmas-miracle-first-chick-hatches-in-whangarei-heads/WNKGVQOKY7DKMEKOTTXSR7HBTQ/

 

 

Experiencing Marine Reserves marine pest education events

The Marine Biosecurity team ran three engagement events with Experiencing Marine Reserves in December and January.  The partnership between Council and Experiencing Marine Reserves is working to develop an ongoing collaboration in the marine biosecurity space, engaging young rangatahi who are passionate about the ocean to keep an eye out for any invasive marine pests when they are in the water.  The engagement included staff providing marine pest stalls at the Experiencing Marine Reserves summer series snorkel event at Reotahi and Oneroa Bay in Russell.  The events provided a great opportunity for staff to educate the public about what we do in the marine biosecurity space, as well as the wider efforts happening around the region and how they can get involved in protecting our marine environment.

Additionally, staff also held a formal pest identification workshop at council for 13 Experiencing Marine Reserves volunteers.  The events had a positive outcome with numerous students, volunteers and adults interested to learn more about marine biosecurity in our local area and a strong willingness to understand how they can help.

A marine biosecurity team member discusses marine pests with an Experiencing Marine Reserves snorkel participant.

 

8.3.2   CEO’s Office

Current Legal Proceedings

Department

Description

Status

Consent decision appeal

Two separate consent applications for replacement and new consents relating to a proposed expansion of, Doug’s Opua Boat Yard in Walls Bay, Ōpua

The council and applicant are preparing an agreed set of conditions that will resolve the appeal.  A draft Consent Order will then be filed with the Court for its consideration.

Consent decision appeal

Irrigation of avocado orchards and horticulture crops

An Environment Court hearing date is set down for two weeks starting on 9 May 2022.  Hydrogeology and ecology experts for parties have produced joint witness statements.  The Applicant’s evidence is due in late February, however, all parties are working towards resolving the appeal if possible.

 

8.3.3   CORPORATE SERVICES

Cyber Security

Keeping ahead of security activity is consuming an increasing amount of organisational resource. The security systems detected one policy breach with a user uploading potentially sensitive documents during the month which has been addressed.

Strengthened policies were deployed during October and November to limit access to non-business sites. During December a significant increase in the number of policies triggered was recorded (721 to 3983). This is providing greater protection to council’s technology systems.

Fraud Declaration

The two previously reported fraud investigations have concluded with both investigations finding no evidence of fraudulent activities. 

 

Enterprise System Update

·   Timeline – Milestones not yet baselined, Supplier provided high level plan (28 Jan), further details to be added to confirm key milestone dates (due mid-February 2022)

·   Budget – Tracking under budget

·   Quality – Tracking to expectations

 

 

 

 

Council Property Update

·    Fleet: In line with council’s recently approved vehicle fleet policy, five full electric vehicles have now replaced older ones in council’s fleet. A further five hybrids are on order for delivery March 2022 to replace existing diesel vehicles.

 

·    Kaipara Service Centre: Site progress has centred largely around internal cladding, services, and internal linings. Overall, the project team are seeing increased contractors on site, sometimes up to 40-plus people, which is generally a positive sign of the increased engagement with the works. The project has Practical Completion of 31 March 2022 and opening ceremony in the first few weeks of April 2022, COVID-19 willing. The project team have been informed of council’s decision to increase the solar power generation and this is now in hand.

 

·      NIWA Kingfish RAS project: has completed initial ground preparation and poured concrete for the first fish tank bases. Offshore equipment procurement is progressing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.3.4   regulatory services

Consents in Process

During December 2021 and January 2022, a total of 189 Decisions were issued.  These decisions comprised:

December 2021 (114)

 

January 2022 (75)

 

Ÿ Coastal Permits

44

Ÿ Moorings

4

Ÿ Land Discharge Permits

14

Ÿ Coastal Permits

6

Ÿ Land Use Consents

46

Ÿ Air Discharge Permits

1

Ÿ Water Permits

7

Ÿ Land Discharge Permits

24

Bore Consents

3

Land Use Consents

35

 

 

Ÿ Water Permits

3

 

 

Ÿ Bore Consents

2

The processing timeframes for the December 2021 consents ranged from:

Ÿ 724 to 6 calendar days, with the median time being 41 days;

Ÿ 473 to 3 working days, with the median time being 26 days.

The processing timeframes for the January 2022 consents ranged from:

Ÿ 469 to 6 calendar days, with the median time being 64 days;

Ÿ 25 to 4 working days, with the median time being 20 days.

Fifty-one applications were received in December 2021.

Eighteen applications were received in January 2022.

Of the 102 applications in progress at the end of January 2022:

Ÿ 25 were received more than 12 months ago;

Reasons for being more than 12 months old:

-    Awaiting additional information (including CIAs)

11

-    Consultation with affected parties/stakeholders

3

-    On-hold pending new rules becoming operative

5

-    Other

6

Ÿ 13 were received between 6 and 12 months ago (most awaiting further information from the applicant);

Ÿ 64 less than 6 months.

Appointment of Hearing Commissioners

No commissioners were appointed in December 2021 and January 2022.

Consents Decisions and Progress on Notified Applications in Process, Objections and Appeals

The current level of notified application processing activities at the end of January 2022 is (by number):

Ÿ Applications Publicly/Limited Notified During Previous Month

1

Ÿ Progress on Applications Previously Notified

3

Ÿ Hearings and Decisions

0

Ÿ Appeals/Objections

2

 

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

The results of compliance monitoring for the period 1 December 2021 - 31 January 2022 (and year-to-date figures) are summarised in the following table and discussed below.

Classification

Total

Full compliance

Low risk non-compliance

Moderate non-compliance

Significant non-compliance

Not exercised during period

Air Discharge

51

48

1

1

0

1

Bore Consent

120

69

43

8

0

0

Coastal Air Discharge

5

5

0

0

0

0

Coastal Discharge

42

39

0

1

2

0

Coastal Permit

68

49

12

6

0

1

FDE – Discharge Permit

1

0

0

0

1

0

FDE – Permitted Activity

0

0

0

0

0

0

Land Discharge

162

135

11

6

1

9

Land Use Consent

93

84

5

2

0

2

Water Discharge

89

61

14

11

3

0

Water Permit

77

73

3

0

0

1

Water Take

114

74

20

14

0

6

Total

822

637

109

49

7

20

Percentage

 

77.5%

13.3%

6.0%

0.9%

2.4%

Year to date

3553

2699

428

255

48

123

Percentage

 

76.0%

12.0%

7.2%

1.4%

3.5%

 

Coastal

Marina bacteriological monitoring was delayed due to rainfall and unreliable laboratory or courier services. Annual seabed sediment compliance monitoring has been completed along upper Hatea River (Town Basin Marina, Kissing Point Marina, Riverside Drive Marina) and Norsand Boatyard, Port Nikau Marina and Marsden Cove Marina.

Coastal structure permit inspections were completed at Whangaroa, Taipa, Totara North and Hokianga.

 

Farm dairy effluent (FDE) monitoring

Annual FDE inspections commenced on 21 July 2021 and were concluded on 29 November 2021. NRC staff and the FDE contractor visited a total of 757 farms this monitoring season (32 less than last year). Comparisons between this season’s results with those for last season are shown in the tables below. 

Consented farms (total 575)

Full Compliance

Moderate Non-Compliance

Significant Non-Compliance

This Year

Last Year

This Year

Last Year

This Year

Last Year

467

398

90

136

18

62

81%

67%

16%

23%

3%

10%

Non-consented farms (total 182)

Full Compliance

Moderate Non-Compliance

Significant Non-Compliance

This Year

Last Year

This Year

Last Year

This Year

Last Year

137

142

36

29

9

22

75%

74%

20%

15%

5%

11%

 

There was a considerable decrease in the number of farms graded as significantly non-compliant this season (4% this season compared with 11% last season). This is partly attributed to significant non-compliances with silage leachate or dead stock rules not being included in this season’s FDE statistics. The statistics only cover farm dairy effluent compliance, which is in line with nationally agreed protocols for reporting of farm dairy effluent statistics. Even with the change to reporting, the comparatively low level of significant non-compliance is still a very good outcome. The Primary Industries monitoring team will be working closely with all the significantly non-compliant farmers to further improve the situation.

While undertaking this year’s FDE monitoring, where possible, relevant regulations of the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (NES-F) and other rules in the Proposed Regional Plan (PRP) pertaining to farming activities were checked on each dairy farm. 

This highlighted the following:

·      There are 102 farms with feedpads within 50 metres of a waterbody which do not meet the permitted activity separation distance criterion in the NES-F.

·      There are no dairy farms which fall under the intensive winter grazing regulation in the NES-F.

·      There are 178 dairy farms which have a silage storage area/bunker within 50 metres of a waterbody which do not meet the permitted activity separation distance criterion in the PRP.

·      There are 24 dairy farms which have a silage storage area/bunker within 20 metres of a public road, which do not meet the permitted activity separation distance criterion in the PRP.

 

The Primary Industries monitoring team is working with dairy farmers to address the above, where required.

 

Water, Waste, Air and Land Use (WWALU) Compliance Monitoring

Ÿ Contaminated Land Management

December 2021

Six incidents involving the discharge of hazardous substances and 17 enquiries regarding contaminated land were received and responded to. 450 kg of hazardous waste was disposed of at the amnesty day and 25 sites were added to the Selected Land-Use Register.

January 2022

Four incidents involving the discharge of hazardous substances and 16 enquiries regarding contaminated land were received and responded to. 390 kg of hazardous waste was disposed of at the amnesty day and 7 sites were added to the Selected Land-Use Register.

·      Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

WWTP/Consent Status

Issues

Enforcement Action/Response

Far North District

Ahipara

Expires 2033

Ongoing non-compliance with bacteriological consent limits

Under AN

FNDC investigating land disposal options

Hihi

Expires 2022

None recently

None currently

Kaeo

Expires 2022

None recently

None currently

Kaikohe

Expired

30 November 2021

Intermittent non-compliances with ADW flow, ammonia & bacteriological consent limits.

System overdue for de-sludging

None currently

Issues will be addressed in replacement consent

Kaitāia

Expired

30 November 2021

None recently

Under AN (reticulation overflows)

Issues will be addressed in replacement consent

Kawakawa

Expires 2036

None recently

None currently

Kerikeri

Expires 2036

No obvious issues from new plant (commissioned in December 2020)

Under AN – but is currently complying with notice

Kohukohu

Expired 2016 (replacement consent application on hold)

Occasional issues with bacteriological conditions of consent

None currently

Opononi & Omāpere

Expired 2019

Non-compliances with bacteriological consent limits

Desludging overdue

Under AN

Issues will be addressed in replacement consent; desludging to be undertaken

Paihia

Expires 2034

Plant upgraded 2019; alkalinity issues preventing optimal ammonia treatment

None currently

Alkalinity improvement project still in progress

Rangiputa

Expires 2032

None recently

None currently

Rāwene

Expires 2023

System overdue for de-sludging

INs issued in February 2022 to FNDC’s contractor for sewage spill from the Rawene reticulation system

Russell

Expires 2024

Occasional non-compliances with E. coli consent limit post UV

Under AN

Taipā

Expires 2029

None recently

None currently

Whatuwhiwhi

Expires 2025

Elevated TSS levels (consent limit may be unnecessarily restrictive)

FNDC to seek consent variation to address TSS levels – low priority

Whangarei District

Hikurangi

Expires 2025

Intermittent issues with plant performance

None currently

Plant performance being reviewed to identify improvements

Ngunguru

Expires 2035

None recently

None currently

Oakura

Expires 2025

Occasional spikes in E. coli

None currently

Portland

Expires 2024

None recently

None currently

Ruakaka

Expires 2046

None recently

None currently

Tutukaka

Expires 2024

None recently

None currently

Waiōtira

Expires 2030

None recently

None currently

Waipū

Expires 2030

None recently

None currently

Whāngārei City

Expires 2022

None recently

None currently

Kaipara District

Dargaville

Expires 2022

Non-compliances with WQ discharge volume consent limits

Pond desludged in 2020 to mitigate water quality issues and the most recent sample results show improvement

Glinks Gully

Expires 2024

No recent issues

None currently

Kaiwaka

Expires 2022

No recent issues

None currently

Mangawhai

Expires 2042

Odour complaints associated with the land irrigation and occasional exceedances of TDS consent limit

AN and IN issued in relation to the odour problem

Maungaturoto

Expires 2032

Intermittent non-compliances, generally due to high rainfall

Under AN

Te Kopuru

Expires 2044

Intermittent minor non-compliances

Second aerator installed 2020

 

Environmental Incidents

There were no environmental incidents reported in December and January which resulted in a significant environmental impact.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENFORCEMENT

Abatement Notices, Infringement Notices and Formal Warnings

Action Type

Number

Abatement Notice

25

Infringement Notice

8

 

Other Enforcement

Ÿ Earthworks without erosion and sediment controls – Tōtara North

Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 20 July 2020 against an individual for earthworks undertaken without controls, and work within a watercourse and the riparian management zone. The defendant has pleaded not guilty. A hearing was scheduled for 22-24 June 2021 which did not proceed due to the defendant being ill. Information has now been provided regarding the medical condition of the defendant. The case has been adjourned for parties to discuss options.

Ÿ Open burning on industrial/trade property – Whangārei

Charges were laid in the Whangārei District Court on 27 November 2020 against an individual for open burning on industrial/trade premises; the burnt items also included prohibited items. There are two charges against the individual who pleaded not guilty on 30 April 2021.  A case review hearing was completed on 22 June 2021.  A hearing date was scheduled for 4 November 2021 which did not proceed and we are currently waiting for the Court to set a new date.

Ÿ Farm dairy effluent – Parapara

Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 6 May 2021 against a farm owner for offences which occurred in August 2020.  There are four charges against the farm owner.  The first court appearance was set down for 9 July 2021, which was adjourned until 25 August 2021 to allow the defence lawyer to consider the disclosure documentation.  The judge at the hearing on the 17 January 2022 requested further information from the defence lawyer. The case has now been adjourned until 21 February 2022.

·   Vessel occupying CMA and removal of asbestos from CMA – Town Basin, Whangārei

An enforcement order was applied for on 23 November 2021 against an individual for occupying the coastal marine with a boat without consent, and for reimbursement of costs associated with work to remove and dispose of cladding material containing asbestos that had been deposited with the coastal marine area. A joint memorandum was filed on 22 December 2021 recording that the respondent agrees to the enforcement order requiring compliance with permitted activity Rule C.1.2.1 of the Proposed Regional Plan to legally moor the boat; and seeking further time to negotiate settlement of the costs claim. No response yet from the Court.

·   Earthworks and vegetation clearance within a wetland – Teal Bay

Charges were laid in the Whangarei District Court on 7 December 2021 against four parties for offences that occurred in December 2021. First appearance date is scheduled for 14 February 2022, an administrative adjournment will be sought to allow time for disclosure to be considered.

8.3.4   regulatory services

LAND MANAGEMENT

Sustainable Hill Country and Regional Priorities

Milestones

Status

Soil Conservation Plans

36 (26%) of 136 soil conservation plans have been completed in 2021-22. 

 

Poplar and Willow nursery

Objective

Status

Nursery expansion

Business case for the nursery expansion complete. Recommendations to be workshopped with Councillors in February. 

 

Whangārei Urban Awa Project

The project has been running well, with the Q2 report having been submitted to MfE on schedule.

Key points:

·   2.38 kms of fencing completed across 5 properties (total of 5.8km planned for the year)

·   Million Metres funding has reached $12,005.97.

·   Landowner engagement/interest has diminished relative to Y1.  We are well on track to meet our fencing requirements for the year.  However, demand for planting has been light to date.

·   On track against the Y2 budget.

·   We are working with the comms team to improve landowner engagement and will likely send out a pamphlet in the next few weeks.

 

Waimā Waitai Waiora Partnership

The groups and organisations involved in the partnership of waimā, waitai, waiora (www) have now combined to plant over 350,000 trees in and around the northern kaipara catchment area. Alongside the trees, over 8700 meters of fencing was established on farms throughout the area in 2021.

Over $37,000 was raised last year via our collaboration with the sustainable business network’s million metres streams project, with funds being donated by various businesses, community groups, and even some generous individual donors.

Despite COVID-19 restrictions, a number of successful events were held by www last year, including research wānanga, community planting days, plant releasing, fish monitoring, water monitoring, and more. The community planting days in particular would not have been possible without the support of local groups, specifically tangata whenua and marae based roopu. The support of such groups has been instrumental in ensuring www is closer to its goal of planting 360,000 trees by the end of this year.

Partnering with mana i te whenua and both national and local authorities has led to more robust decision-making processes, more meaningful outcomes, and continued support for the kaupapa from local residents. The partnership and the mahi being done has also enabled local groups and residents to begin building trust in the partnership and those involved.

The partnership has continued to provide quality information and support to landowners throughout the northern kaipara catchment area via a range of channels and mediums. One such channel is the www website, which was launched around the middle of last year. The site continues to provide up-to-date information and resources for landowners wanting to implement sustainable practices on their land.

Whilst the obvious challenges involved with partnerships including so many parties have presented themselves, the partnership has continually found a way to push forward towards the common goal of restoring the mauri of the northern wairoa river.

A picture containing grass, sky, outdoor, person

Description automatically generated

Whakaahua 1 working together with Living Waters and Hapū to undertake a native fish survey in the Hikurangi Repo.

 

 

BIODIVERSITY

 

FIF Dune Lakes Project

Objective

Status

Aquatic weed and pest fish control

Post treatment submerged plant monitoring was undertaken at Lakes Tutaki, Egg (Poutō) and Mt Camel North (Houhora). These lakes have been treated for hornwort with Reglone which is a cost-effective option for reducing weed volume. After two ¼ lake treatments Tutaki has shown an excellent knockback at more than 90% of the weed volume.  Treatment of these lakes with Aquathol K is planned for late summer and autumn.

Biodiversity freshwater staff met on site in the new year with the Te Uri o Hau Incorporation who own the land around Lake Karaka, a large, high value lake at Poutō where hornwort has been found. If left this weed will increase and dominate the entire lake potentially causing its collapse. Mana whenua landowners have given permission for NRC to lead a herbicide operation using Aquathol K to eradicate the pest weed.

Sediment and nutrient mitigation

Nil

Education Days

Staff assisted with a freshwater education day at Lake Waimimiha near Ahipara at a Noho Taiao event organised by Te Rarawa Rūnanga.

 

Coastcare

Dune health assessments were undertaken in December and January with the Science Team.   The aim is to assess the health of the dunes and track changes over time such as changes in percentage native/exotic vegetation and increase/decrease in total plant cover.  This helps to get an objective picture of dune damage and track the impact of any dune restoration efforts.  Most sites on the schedule are now assessed annually.

Vegetation transects were re-measured at six sites including Ahipara, Taipa and Waipu Cove and new sites set up at Puwheke, Waipapakauri and Marsden Point.  The transect data can be viewed and compared to the previous survey results at https://monitoring.coastalrestorationtrust.org.nz/survey-data/northland.  Alongside the transect data, drone footage will be used to measure dune topography and track changes over time.

See also report on dune fauna assessments in Natural Resources section.

 

A picture containing outdoor, person, nature

Description automatically generated

Measuring a vegetation transect at Puwheke, Karikari Peninsula

 

Wetlands

Planning for the fourth, 3-yearly round of wetland condition index (WCI) monitoring has been underway, and the first wetland visits undertaken.  This monitoring started in 2011 and covers over 28 wetlands, most of which were fenced under Efund.  Monitoring will be carried out over the next few months using the nationally developed methodology which assesses, and scores changes in wetland condition. Feedback is given to landowners by way of letters and management recommendations.

Terrestrial

The first of the biodiversity assessments is underway at the NRC forestry block at Tāika / Mt Tiger, with acoustic recorders set out to detect the presence of bats and tracking tunnels for pests in the north-western block of the forest.  These will be rotated around the remaining forest over the next few weeks.  Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research is advising on sites for plots for vegetation assessments.

NATURAL RESOURCES

Coastal/Water Quality Operations

·   The annual Hātea awa clean up comprised of 25 NRC staff who collected 340kgs of rubbish.

·   The monitored beaches in Northland have been live on Safeswim since December as a trial this summer.

·   Non-telemetered continuous dissolved oxygen sensors have been installed at 19 sites and are being validated monthly by the team as part of the ecosystem metabolism monitoring programme.

·   The continuous water quality sites have been validated monthly.  The sonde at Tikinui Wharf has suffered corrosion which compromised the probes.  The decision was made to pause data collection as investment would be needed to replace the sonde at this site while a data review of the site is completed.

Natural Resources Science

·   The Science and Rivers teams have partnered on an open tender process for purchasing a high-resolution GIS-based digital river network (DRN) model.  The tender was advertised on GETS on 17 December 2021, closing on 1 February 2022.

Air quality and carbon emission

No breach of National Environmental Standard for air quality (NESAQ) for PM10 has occurred in 2021. PM2.5 results were also within the proposed NESAQ limits.

The Ministry for the Environment and Statistics NZ released Our Air 2021 in
December 2021. The report evaluated monitoring results against two standards or guidelines – National Environmental Standard for air quality (NESAQ) and World Health Organisation (WHO) air quality guidelines to indicate potential impacts on human health. In
summary the report findings for Northland are;

·   PM10 concentrations at Whangārei airshed, Robert Street have improved between 2011 and 2020.   The PM10 concentration trend confirms the findings of PM10 emission inventory produced by PDP (reported in October 2021).  The emission inventory found that Whangārei’s winter day PM10 emission decreased approximately by 27 percent from 2006 to 2018.  This is due to no new major PM10 emission sources having been consented in that period in the airshed and two major consented industries (Ballance Fertiliser and Carter Holt Harvey mills) ceasing their operation during this period.  Other factors such as the backyard burning rule implemented in 2008 and improved wood burners on new buildings, together with increased use of electrical heating appliances, may have also contributed towards the improving trend in PM10 concentration.

·   On one occasion between 2017 and 2020, the daily PM10 concentration at Whangārei airshed was higher than the 2021 WHO air quality guidelines.

·   Ninety five percent of New Zealand’s PM2.5 air monitoring sites, including Whangārei airshed recorded PM2.5 concentrations above the 24-hour (15 µg/m3) and annual (5 µg/m3) 2021 WHO air quality guidelines.

·   No similar trend was observed for PM10 concentrations at Marsden Point airshed.

Coastal

Stormwater litter project

·   The quarterly audit of the stormwater litter traps found a total of 7,204 items captured in the 51 litter traps in the three months period.  This is a 23% increase on the number of items captured in the previous quarterly audit.

·   Cigarette butts were again the most frequently captured item, with 2200 cigarette butts found (31% of all items), followed by fragments of soft plastic (1,577 items).  Overall, the dominant source of litter was plastic (72%).

·   Once again there were big differences between locations.  A transport/logistics site in Whangārei had 1075 items, while a residential street in Dargaville had just six items.  The worst five sites were: a transport and logistics site (1075 items); Lower Dent Street car park, in Whangārei (872 items); Mangawhai village shops (346 items); Whangārei hospital car park (328 items); and a food retailing site (298 items).

·   Overall, a total of 17,574 litter items have been captured by the 51 Litter Traps across the region since December 2020.  The data collected so far indicates that transport and logistic sites, loading bays, food retailing, car parks and playgrounds are high risk locations for litter and plastic.  In contrast, residential areas, professional and commercial land uses, and accommodation providers appear to be low risk.

 

A picture containing ground, outdoor, stone, cement

Description automatically generated

Stormwater grate at Lower Dent Street carpark, in Whangārei.

 

 

Freshwater ecology

·   Organised and hosted a joint electrofishing training seminar, provided by Smith-Root USA, with the Department of Conservation, Te Roroa, and local kaitiaki.

·   Initiated fish monitoring and the revitalised riverine ecology monitoring programmes.

·   Preliminary attributes and methodologies have been identified for ecological monitoring under the Drought Management Plan.

Freshwater quality

·   Envirolink Tools project - A two-day workshop was attended in December 2021 to discuss on a nationally consistent protocol for Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of riverine flow management under NPS-FM.  The Tools project is led by NIWA and Cawthron scientists and includes feedback and local experience from regional council experts.  The project is aimed at providing a national framework for effective and efficient monitoring and evaluation of instream ecological response to riverine flow management by regional councils, in accordance with the NPS-FM.

·   The work under National Environmental Monitoring Standard (NEMS) for sampling planktonic cyanobacteria is in progress. This work is jointly led by selected SWIM (Regional Sector Special Interest Group on integrated freshwater Management) members from regional councils including NRC, Waikato, Hawkes Bay, Environment Canterbury and Otago Regional Council.  The draft protocol written by NIWA algae expert Karl Safi is expected to be ready by June 2022.

 

Natural Resources Data

·   The Kieco biological database is now operational for periphyton, macroinvertebrate and sediment accumulation data.  The estuary monitoring component will be operational by February 2022.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hydrology

Rainfall

Diagram

Description automatically generated

Diagram

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

·   January rainfall averaged across the entire Northland region was about 43% of the normal expected.

·   Much of the region was below 40%, with the least rainfall along the West Coast, the Southeast, and Northeast. Kai iwi recorded 5%, Pouto 10%, Hakaru 9% and Oruru 11%.

·   The East Coast received more rain with 101% in Kerikeri, and 120% at Marsden Point.

 

·   Rainfall totals show the same pattern with a regional average of 33.6mm compared to the normal expected 79mm for the month

·   Kai iwi and Pouto along the West Coast recorded the least with 4mm and 6.5m respectively.

·   Thunderstorms brought more rain to the East with 101mm recorded in Kerikeri.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rivers

Map

Description automatically generated

·   River flows in the Far North and Eastern catchments are mostly in the Normal to Above Normal percentile ranges, with some rivers falling below normal.

·   River Flows in Central, Western and Southern catchments are mostly Below Normal to Low percentile ranges.

·   These flow ranges reflect the rainfall distribution pattern for January.

 

 

Groundwater

Map

Description automatically generated

Groundwater levels throughout the Region remain in the Normal to Above Normal percentile ranges, except for Russell which is Below Normal for January.

 

Hydrology Projects

·   Hydrometric station hardware upgrades continue.

 

 

Summary of the NIWA Seasonal Climate Outlook February 2022 – April 2022 for Northland

·   La Nina conditions are highly likely to continue, elevating the risk of atmospheric rivers and ex-tropical cyclones, which can bring heavy rainfall and increase the risk of flooding.

·   Temperatures are very likely to be above average (70% chance).

·   Rainfall totals are about equally likely to be near normal (40% chance) to above normal (35% chance).

·   Soil moisture levels and river flows are most likely to be near normal (45% chance).

 

Table

Description automatically generated

 

POLICY AND PLANNING

Proposed Regional Plan

·    The Environment Court approved the process for mapping of Outstanding Natural Landscapes in the CMA (17 January).  The first step in the process is to work with MTAG to select a Maori cultural landscape facilitator.

·    Council are due to report to the Environment Court on the outcome of any inter-party discussions on Topic 14 – Marine Protected Areas by 11 February.

·    The Environment Court has set a hearing date for the appeals on the aquaculture provision (19 September 2022).

·    Council are required to report back to the Environment Court by 18 February on the implications of the High Court decision regarding the application of the ‘rules’ in the Freshwater National Environment Standard on the Proposed Regional Plan mangrove removal and vehicles on beaches rules.

·    There are a number of matters we are waiting on an Environment Court decision (i.e. hearing already held) released:

Discharges to land and water

Land use and disturbance activities

Livestock exclusion

·    In addition to the above, the other outstanding matters which are still progressing (but hope to resolve without the need for hearing) are:

General provisions and plan structure

Infrastructure and energy (one policy)

Damming and diversion of water (two provisions unresolved).

·    The budget for the plan appeals is tracking towards approximately a $70,000 deficit by the end of the financial year.  By far the biggest cost element is legal.  Staff are using the lawyers sparingly, but it is a necessity given the Environment Court process and representing the council’s and community’s interests as best we can.  The deficit is likely to be largely offset by savings in other parts of the Policy and Planning team’s budget – in particular the Coastal Occupation Charging Plan Change budget, where only a small amount of the $80,000 budget is likely to be used this year.

 

Freshwater Plan Change

·   An update of the freshwater plan change process and the revised date for notification (now April 2024) was presented to a Council Workshop on 14th December. Council is keen to see no further extension of the notification date. NRC has set some ‘hard dates’ to complete key pieces of work, to minimise the risk of further slippage in the freshwater plan change process.

·   Staff will be presenting to council workshop in early March the draft plan change framework and the results of the modelling the effectiveness and costs of a range of water improvement interventions (e.g. fencing and riparian planting).

·   The Primary Sector Liaison Group met on 25 January 2002.  Members have provided feedback on the challenges and opportunities for the primary sector with regard to freshwater in Northland.  The group has started providing feedback on the Visions/values/objectives component of the draft freshwater plan change framework.

 

National initiatives and advocacy

Proposed changes to the National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water Drinking Water

An item is included in this agenda recommending a council make a submission.

Discussion document on resource management system reform

An item is included in this agenda recommending a council make a submission.

Taumata Arowai

Taumata Arowai is the regulator of drinking water supplies under the Water Services Act 2021.  It is consulting on a series of documents targeted at drinking water suppliers – they include drinking water standards, quality assurance rules, aesthetic values, network environmental performance measures and acceptable solutions for a range of different supplies.  Staff have yet to assess these proposals – the consultation closes 28 March 2022.  The documents are available here: https://www.taumataarowai.govt.nz/httpste-puna-korero-taumataarowai-govt-nz/

He Waka Eke Noa

He Waka Eke Noa is a partnership project between the agricultural sector, government and Māori to develop a framework to support farmers to measure, manage and reduce agricultural emissions (methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide). The partnership has released a consultation document on options for pricing agricultural emissions targeted at farmers and growers. The options proposed include farm-level levies and a processor-level hybrid option – it also proposes recognizing on farm sequestration that is not rewarded in the ETS (e.g. shelterbelts / riparian planting). The default position if other options are not progressed is the agricultural sector entering the Emissions Trading Scheme (at the processor level). While feedback is sought by 1 March 2022, staff do not propose to lodge a submission on this consultation document due to competing consultation requirements having a higher priority and limited staff capacity.  The consultation document is here:  https://hewakaekenoa.nz/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Consultation-Document_Final-1.pdf

Submission on Sand Mining Resource Consents

A council submission was lodged on two resource consent applications publicly notified by Auckland Council.  The applications were made by McCallum Brothers Ltd for the continuation of sand mining activities off Pakiri Beach adjacent to the regional boundary at Mangawhai.  The submission was neutral, seeking that full consideration be given to the significance of Mangawhai sandspit and ensuring that it is not adversely affected by the proposal.  The submissions were acknowledged by Auckland Council, but a hearing date has not yet been set.

Mangawhai Central Limited

Council has joined as a Section 274 party to the appeals on the plan change for the development of an integrated residential and commercial precinct at Mangawhai.  Council’s concern is ensuring the proposal will be adequately serviced with a reliable water supply.  Mediation between the parties was held late last year and a further day on the 13 January.  Discussions are ongoing but we are hopeful of reaching a resolution without the need to attend a hearing.

Wetland mapping project

This project is set to update existing wetland maps and help implement the governments Essential Freshwater reforms and is being undertaken in collaboration with the Kaipara Moana Remediation Programme (in Kaipara and Whangarei districts).  By June 2023 the desk top wetland mapping (for Kaipara and Whangarei districts) should be complete.  In the meantime, staff are considering how best this should be communicated with iwi / hapu and the wider community.  Papers will be circulated to future TTMAC and Planning and Regulatory Working Parties providing advice and seeking feedback. 

8.3.6   BIOSECURITY

INCURSIONS

Indian ringneck parakeet

Covid-19 pressures and the Christmas holiday period have delayed the Indian ringneck parakeet response near the Brynderwyn’s.  It is hoped that Biosecurity New Zealand, the lead agency for the response will be able to make progress in the near future.   Council Biosecurity staff have offered to assist with the response and continue to maintain contact with Biosecurity NZ Indian ring-necked parakeets are an exclusion animal pest in Northland and threaten native birds and bats by competing for food and nesting places whilst introducing diseases. 

WILD ANIMAL CONTROL

Russell sika response

Biosecurity staff working around Russell have gained two major landowner consents for the proposed goat control, sika survey, and eventual sika control work.

Staff are awaiting a response from the Department of Conservation regarding the delegation of the Wild Animal Control act powers which will assist the eradication programme.

Deer farm escapes

There have been two deer farm escapes in the last two months. 

·   Kaiwaka:  Six deer escaped from a farm near Kaiwaka after a tree fell on a fence.  The farmer has managed to recapture two deer and council is working with him to ensure all deer are accounted for.

·   Kamo:  Two deer escaped from a location near Kamo through a faulty floodgate.  A mail drop and Facebook messages have been fed into the community and both deer have been shot by local hunters.

Unconsented deer farm activity

Two deer farms that do not have the Department of Conservation farming permits have been reported.

·   Manganui:  Council’s deer response contractor discovered an unpermitted deer farm whilst doing night surveillance.  Further investigation has found up to 30 untagged deer on a property in the Manganui catchment.  Council is working with the Department of Conservation, Ministry for Primary Industries, OSPRI (Operational Solutions for Primary Industries) and the landowner to destock the farm.

·   Paparoa:  Acting on information received an unpermitted deer farm has been found in Paparoa.  Council is working with the Department of Conservation and the Ministry for Primary Industries to determine how this farm was established and the deer registered on the National NAIT database without a permit to farm. 

 

FRESHWATER

Check, Clean, Dry advocacy programme

The Check, Clean, Dry advocacy programme (aimed at preventing the spread of invasive freshwater pests in Northland) commenced in December.  Activities have included:

·   Waka ama competitions:  Events were attended at Lake Ngatu (22 November) and Lake Manuwai (8 January).  Participants were engaged about Check Clean Dry and freshwater pests, and collateral provided.

·   Te Rarawa Noho Taiao: An education event held at Lake Waimimiha South around freshwater lakes, fish, and Check Clean Dry for a range of age groups.

·   Ōtāria/Moerewa spill way wānanga:  This workshop centred around providing education to the hapū around freshwater lakes, rivers, biodiversity, and biosecurity.  A presentation including freshwater pests and their identification was included with a segment on the importance of Check Clean Dry when going between waterways.

·   Taharoa Domain lake side advocacy:  Advocacy at the Kai iwi lakes included engagement with members of the public both at the boat ramp and the camping grounds.  Collateral was provided to the Kai iwi Lakes campground office for the public, and the campground manager and harbour master were also briefed on Check Clean Dry so they can do their own advocacy. 

Pest freshwater fish

The Biosecurity and Biodiversity team have a new dinghy to help with pest fishing work and a new net decontamination tank for cleaning fishing nets has been set up. 

Staff have increased messaging around keeping an eye out for koi carp to holiday makers at Kai Iwi Lake over holiday period through additional signage around the lake, pamphlets at the camp ground office, and messaging on social media.   

 

 

The new fishing net decontamination tank.

KAURI PROTECTION

Soil sampling and training

Soil sampling of kauri to detect the causal agent Phytophthora agathidicida is in full swing across the region with five sites sampled and 80 samples taken.

The Kauri Protection team have also trained kaitiaki from the Te Rūnanga-Ā-Iwi O Ngāpuhi Kaitiaki Kauri Team and the Ngāti Rēhia Kauri Sanctuary.  The training focused on how to correctly take soil sample to detect P. agathidicida.

Rongoā treatment

Staff have also provided advice and assistance to a roopu  to undertake Rongoā treatment of infected kauri located in Pāwarenga. 

A council kauri protection staff member
explains the soil sampling process to the
Te Rūnanga-Ā-Iwi O Ngāpuhi Kaitiaki Kauri team leader.

PARTNERSHIPS

Piroa Brynderwyn High Value Area

Piroa Brynderwyn Landcare has been operating as a steering group for the past four years.  During this time the activities have moved from a pest animal and trapping focus to other conservation outcomes including pest plant control, education, and wider biodiversity.  Growth in community groups has gone from an original six to more than 30 that vary enormously in size and complexity of the work that they are doing.  One of these groups has established themselves as an independent trust.

Funding from Council and local sponsors/donors has been tremendous to get things kicked off, but funding needs and deliverables now require a more formal approach to governance.  Hence the decision to establish a formal trust under the Charities Services of Department of Internal Affairs.

Piroa Conservation Trust (PCT) is proposed as the name of the new trust, with the vision:

Te Ao Tūroa: Nature-People Flourishing Together
Ki Uta ki Tai:  from the hills to the sea

This vision has been deliberately kept broad. The objectives of the trust drill more specifically into the outcomes sought in the Piroa Brynderwyn Landcare high value area and are underpinned by the 5 year management plan and the recent ecology report with its 10 year roadmap.  Pivotal to the formation of a new trust is the intent to work in partnership with iwi/hapū – Te Uri o Hau and Patuharakeke.  The resulting partnership agreement sits alongside the trust deed as a mana enhancing agreement.  The trustees would be elected from and by the wider steering group – the Piroa Conservation Collective.  This group would be similar in composition to the existing PBL steering group.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tutukaka High Value Area

·   Predator control:  Cat and mustelid catches over December-January (69) have doubled from the previous two month period.  The majority of the catch was taken in the Tutukaka Landcare Rayonnier projects.

·   Myrtle rust:  Rust has been found on fresh, new growth leaves of a young pōhutukawa at Riverlands (Figure 1). The identification was confirmed by a specialist mycologist.  Dozens of other pōhutukawa in the area were checked but were unaffected. More on myrtle rust can be found here https://myrtlerust.org.nz/ and incidences can be reported through iNaturalist.  

 

Myrtle rust on a young pōhutukawa leaves at Riverlands.

.

 

Kai Iwi Lakes 

The Taharoa Domain (Kai Iwi Lakes) toxin operation was completed with uneaten bait retrieved from bait stations on 6 December 2021.  A 7 day wax tag post monitor was carried out prior to Christmas and returned a result of 23% which was slightly above the aim of £20%.  The results between years show that possum population numbers quickly recover (and grow) after an operation is completed because of rapid reinvasion from surrounding areas.  This highlights that until there is pest control occurring on private land around the lakes that there will be limits to what level of control can be achieved and maintained in the domain. 

 

 

 

 

Wax tag index results from Taharoa Domain toxin operations – 2020 and 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tānekaha Community Pest Control Area

Allen the kiwi has successfully hatched his second nesting in the Tānekaha Community Pest Control Area.  The two chicks were microchipped in January under the supervision of Biosecurity staff in January.

 

 

 

 

The grandchildren of a Tānekaha
Community Pest Control Area landowner
 get up close and personal
 with one of Allen’s two chicks
 during microchipping.

.

PREDATOR FREE

Predator Free Whangārei

·   Possum control:  Focus in Whangārei Heads project area has been bait and trap device installation in priority locations.  Possum removal will begin in February.  As the initial working blocks move into mop up stage, operations will extend further north.

·   Community engagement:  Engagement with landowners continues, and two hui were conducted with Whangārei Heads hapū to discuss their aspirations and ideas on eradication work.  Hapū approval has been obtained to install a third live capture hub at Reotahi.  A brief project update submitted to Whangārei Heads Citizens Association which will be published in their February community newsletter

·   Trail cameras:  Images from trail cameras have been classified with possums present in:

-      Working block 1 (Te Whara / Bream Head) – 6% (2 of 32 cameras)

-      Working block 2 (Taurikura) – 60% (26 of 43 cameras)

.

Left: Possum detection (black dots) by trail cameras in the Predator Free Whangārei area between 12-16 August 2021.  Where detected, possums have been abundant.  Right: Possums caught on trail camera at Taurikura.

 

Predator Free Pēwhairangi Whānui (Bay of Islands)

Community engagement has included hui with Kororāreka Marae Society, Russell Landcare Trust, and 3B2 Trust at Rāwhiti. 

MARINE BIOSECURITY

Hull surveillance

Between the 22 November 2021 and 28 January 2022, the 2021/2022 Hull Surveillance Programme surveyed 494 vessels.  There were 29 incidents of Sabella spallanzanii (Mediterranean fanworm), one incident of Styela clava (clubbed tunicate) and one incident of Eudistoma elongatum (Australian droplet tunicate) found on vessel hulls, the majority of which were in Whangārei Harbour.  All incidents of pests recorded on vessels outside of infected areas were cleaned within 5 working days either in-water by an approved dive contractor or by owner directed haul outs.  Marine biosecurity staff continue to work closely with vessels in infected harbours to ensure they are cleaned within an appropriate time frame or before they move to another harbour. 

Table 1:  Hull Surveillance Programme Results to 28 January 2022

2020/2021 Hull Surveillance Programme Results

Total this month

Total YTD

Pathways Plan Compliance

 

 

Number of vessels surveyed this month

494

1,008

% Pathways Plan Compliance (all vessels) *

63.8

56.1

Vessels found with Marine Pests

 

 

Sabella spallanzanii (fanworm)

29

35

Styela clava (clubbed tunicate)

1

41

Undaria pinnatifida (Japanese kelp)

0

0

Eudistoma elongatum (Australian droplet tunicate)

1

2

Pyura doppelgangera (sea squirt)

0

0

*     Percentage vessels surveyed complying with acceptable level of light fouling as defined in the Marine Pathways Plan.

Detection of Sabella spallanzanii (fanworm) on a commercial barge in Houhora 

Contract divers detected fanworm on a large commercial barge while conducting biosecurity hull inspections in Houhora harbour in January 2022.  Fanworm is not known to be established in the area.  Given the size of the barge, environmental conditions, and the distance away from any facilities where the barge could be hauled it was agreed that the best method to mitigate risks in this instance was to have trained divers remove all individuals with the burden of cost being the responsibility of the barge company.  A large six diver team attended the barge supervised by council marine biosecurity staff on the 27-28 January, removing approximately 550 individuals with an average size of approximately 120 mm.  Council staff preformed histological analysis on a subset

Marine biosecurity staff conducting histological analysis on Mediterranean fanworm using field microscope and equipment.

of the individuals removed which revealed that a majority of the fanworm were within their first reproductive year and had not spawned yet.  There was however a small number of individuals that had the potential to have existed on the barge for a number of years and as such spawning within Houhora could not be ruled out.  Staff will continue to engage with the barge contractor and their client to arrange routine surveillance of seabed and structures following this incident. 

 

PEST PLANTS

Eradication plants

Biosecurity staff and contractors are busy with the schedule of summer eradication and progressive containment pest plant control work.  This includes resuming the large scale grid search work for batwing passionflower in bush reserves in the Kamo area that had been delayed by Auckland based contractors unable to travel because of COVID-19 restrictions.

Progressive containment and sustained control plants

The first annual round of the Ministry for Primary Industries funded Manchurian wild rice program is also well underway, with good results from the previous round of spray evident.

With tree privet flowering quite early staff are also receiving numerous requests for advice around control and for enforcement of boundary rules.

Pest plant Biofunds

Small Biofunds to help landowners with knock down of serious pest plants are becoming increasingly popular.  For high priority sites and target species, in addition to control resources, some contract hours are being made available where landowners have invested volunteer hours or matched the contractor contribution.  This helps with project momentum and rapid knockdown of seed sources reduces the maintenance effort required.

 

8.3.7   GOVERNANCE AND ENGAGEMENT

MĀORI ENGAGEMENT

He Maimai Aroha

Haere atu rā e ngā tini mate

Hoki atu ki te mūrau a te tini

Ki te wenerau a te mano

Ki te wāhi hokinga kore ki muri

Ki te pō ra kia koutou e moe

Kei ngā whānau katoa

Tēnei te tuku i ngā whakāronui ki a koutou i tēnei wā pouri

Nei ka pari atu ngā tai o aroha ki a koutou!

It was with great sadness that we heard the news of the passing away of two Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) hapū representatives Victor Holloway, Ngāti Tara and Hoki Tua, Whāingaroa.  Both known for their commitment for the hopes and aspirations of their hapū and iwi, they will both be sadly missed for their contributions and leadership on TTMAC.

Tangata Whenua Engagement

Currently our team are working on the following activities to improve engagement with tangata whenua on resource consents processes:

·    A meeting held with hapū kaitiaki from across Te Taitokerau to consider how we can improve our decision making processes and provide better information to applicants and staff.

·    Updating of Resource Consents contacts including Marae, Hapū, Iwi and Ingoa Wharenui and Wharekai.

·    Reviewing of historic Hapū and Iwi environmental and monitoring plans and contacts and with relevant hapū and iwi to discuss revisions and progressing new applications with Te Parawhau and Ngāti Toro.  Providing relevant information for expressions of interest for the next funding round.

Mana Whakahono ā Rohe (MWaR)

The team is currently working with the policy and planning team to prepare and consider a review of the MWaR with hapū Patuharakeke and Ngāti Rehia.  Te Uri o Hau and Te Parawhau are keen to be signatories to the agreement, however COVID-19 has impacted the ability to do this appropriately ā kānohi (face to face on the marae).

Treaty Health Check

An independent health check is underway and has been endorsed and supported by the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) and council. Utilising the Te Arawhiti Framework https://www.tearawhiti.govt.nz/assets/Tools-and-Resources/Maori-Crown-Relations-Capability-Framework-Individual-Capability-Component.pdf council will undertake an independent review of areas that are identified as key priorities by the Māori Technical Advisory Group (MTAG) on behalf of TTMAC caucus, and other key stakeholders in our commitment to building meaningful relationships with tangata whenua.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Investment and Growth Reserve – Projects Report

Project

Update

Future developments/ reporting

REL

Expecting to receive draft repayment agreement between REL and NRC.

Further information to be provided.

Extension 350

Quarterly evaluation meeting held in December.

Presentation update given to JREDC.

The E350 team reported that budget is on track and further funding for evaluation and planning next steps has been secured. Potential follow-on programme as part of a broader “Grow Northland” work programme

Other Work Undertaken

Ÿ Joint Regional Economic Development Committee (JREDC) – Meeting held on 10 December followed by the quarterly workshop with Northland Inc directors. A letter of expectations on the Statement of Intent 2022-25 sent to Northland Inc.

Ÿ Northland Economic Quarterly – 32nd issue of the NEQ Newsletter published. The annual section looks at selected primary industries in Northland while the spotlight section analyses the latest business demographic data. The latest issue is available online at https://www.nrc.govt.nz/resource-library-summary/newsletters/economic-quarterly/.

Ÿ Economic information – Provided data on economic impact of COVID-19 to various parties; worked with Te Hiku Development Trust to create a “Te Hiku Iwi” cluster within the Northland region economic profile hosted by Infometrics.

Ÿ Digital – Prepared letter from the Mayoral Forum to Hon Dr David Clark, Minister for the Digital Economy and Communications on various digital issues.

Ÿ Oruku Landing Project – Prepared letter from CEO to proponents clarifying that NRC’s funding is no longer available in light of WDC decision to abandon the project.

Ÿ Te Tai Tokerau Water Trust (TTTWT) – Provided briefing to council workshop and continued discussions with the Trust on progress being made on water storage schemes.

Ÿ Land Use Mapping –Drafting request for proposal (RFP) in conjuction with Science team.

Ÿ CLUES Scenarios costings– Supporting Policy and Plannng team with water quality mitigation options costings.

 

ONLINE CHANNELS

Most popular content on Facebook:    

*Engaged – number of people who ‘reacted’, commented, or shared the post

Key Performance Indicators

Sep-21

Oct-21

Nov-21

Dec-21

Jan-22

WEB

 

 

 

 

 

# Visits to the NRC website

34,900

41,300

33,100

34,526

41,600

E-payments made

29

33

20

18

7

# subscription customers (cumulative)

1,286

1,273

1,273

NA*

1,263

SOCIAL MEDIA (cumulative)

 

 

 

 

 

# Twitter followers

1,562

1,566

1,564

1,564

1,567

# NRC Facebook fans

10,500

10,500

10,507

10,469

10,510

# NRC Overall Facebook Reach

56,300

37,300

57,300

244,777

157,700

# NRC Engaged Daily Users

2,502

1,479

2,093

4,821

2,755

# CDEM Facebook fans

25,419

25,700

25,800

26,120

26,117

# CDEM Overall Facebook Reach

344,100

325,000

236,900

NA*

214,100

# CDEM Engaged Daily Users

27,400

54,700

30,600

NA*

26,600

# Instagram followers

1,422

1,442

1,450

NA*

1,488

 

NOTES: *NA – Data not available due to Christmas break.

ENVIROSCHOOLS / EDUCATION

Dune Lakes Education Day

On 11 January, Enviroschools, Biodiversity and Land Management team members ran a dune lakes education day at Lake Waimimiha, near Ahipara, as part of Te Noho Taiao o Te Rarawa.  Environmental action stations covered pest fish, water quality and tuna (eels).

Bronze, Silver and Green-Gold Enviroschools

Council’s Enviroschools continue to grow in depth and breadth of environmental knowledge and action, as they progress through the Bronze, Silver and Green-Gold stages.  

Celebrations

During December, councillors joined in Enviroschools celebrations with Bay of Islands International Academy - Green-Gold with Cr Joce Yeoman – and with Forest View (Tikipunga), Parihaka and Tikipunga Kindergartens - Bronze with Crs Jack Craw, Terry Archer and Amy Macdonald. During December also, Tangiteroria School became a Silver Enviroschool. 

This year, it is exciting to note that almost 40 Enviroschools from across the region plan to Reflect at Bronze (14), Silver (15), Green-Gold (3) and Green-Gold reviews (6).

Enviroschools communities facilitated

Despite the school holidays, during December and January Enviroschools Facilitators held specific interactions with 66 school and early childhood communities.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Communications

Communications issued in December/January included our quarterly e-newsletter and newspaper spread, Our Northland, our Coastcare e-newsletter, rates brochure as well as 12 media releases covering the following topics:

·    Release of new floodmaps

·    Scholarships opening for applications

·    Masks on buses competition

·    Rubbish barge in Bay of Islands

·    Call to tackle pest plants

·    Beach buses and free bus travel before Christmas

·    Cancellation of Whangarei Heads bus route

·    Shipping channel warning

·    Life jacket library in Far North

·    Awanui floodworks update

·    Natural causes of waterway pollution

·    Tackling moth plant

Campaigns

Several marketing campaigns were completed or are in progress:

·    Transport Mask Up Campaign to encourage mask use on our buses

·    Summer Beach Buses promoting our service to Ocean Beach and Ruakaka

·    Can I Swim here to highlight our summer water monitoring activity and encourage the public to check it is safe to swim before they get in.

·    Recruitment campaign promoting NRC as a place to work and driving sign-ups for our vacancy alerts

·    Nobody’s stronger than Tangaroa – promoting safer boating practices

Scholarships

Our scholarships programme, Tū I te Ora, is open to applications until the start of March. Radio, print and social media advertising are being used to promote the scholarships.

COVID-19

COVID-19 continues to impact us from a communications and engagement perspective on multiple fronts: internal comms to support the organisations workplace response to COVID-19, working with other areas of the organisation like transport to encourage mask wearing, and event cancellations including the Whangarei and Kaikohe A&P shows. It has also now been confirmed that Field Days will not go ahead this year. Where possible we are working to continue to run events like enviroschools in line with government protocols or shifting to hybrid or virtual delivery where we can.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INFORMATION (LGOIMA) REQUESTS

Total LGOIMAs

Dec 2020 to Feb 2021

Dec 2021 to Feb 2022

33

13

Number of LGOIMAs not responded to within 20 working days

0

 

 

 

CUSTOMER SERVICES

Telephone inbound call statistics & enquiries

   

Nov 2021  

Dec 2021

Jan 2022

Call volume via Customer Services 

2240

1713

2049

Average wait time 

7.8secs

7.2 secs

5.2 secs

 

Customer service calls have been fairly consistent with a slight drop in numbers over December. The greatest volume of calls have been for biosecurity, maritime and consents.

 

 

1 July 2018 –

30 June 2019

1 July 2019 –

30 June 2020 

1 July 2020 –

30 June 2021

Call volume via Customer Services 

20812

30566 

31130

This is the call volume over the last three years using our 3CX system.

Mailroom email processing performance
The inwards mail has, as expected slowed somewhat over the summer period.

 

Nov 2021

Dec 2021

Jan 2022

Mail processed

904

810

679

Satisfaction monitoring

All complaints were attended to.

Feedback cards, compliments, and complaints

Compliments received  

Total  

December 2021 and January 2022

Service provided by a specific person/people

·    Monitoring

·    Melissa Larkin

·    City Link

 

 

2

1

1

Total compliments recorded

4

 

Complaints received  

Total  

December 2021 and January 2022

Service provided by a specific person/people

·    City Link buses

·    Maritime

 

 

 

9

1

Total complaints recorded

10

 

8.3.8   COMMUNITY RESILIENCE

 

TRANSPORT

 

PASSENGER TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATION 

*BusLink figures are reported one month in arrears, due to the required information being unavailable at the time of the agenda deadline. 

Bus Link stats for November 2021 

(revenue ex GST)    

Actual   

Budget   

Variance   

Year/Date Actual   

Year/Date Budgeted   

Variance   

CityLink passengers carried

29,884

27,573

+2,311

114,954

137,918

-22,964

CityLink fares collected

$32,906

$35,337

-$2,431

$146,323

$176,754

-$30,431

Mid North Link passengers carried

 

144

 

156

 

-12

 

689

 

792

 

-103

Mid North Link fares collected

$446

$780

-334

$1,851

$3,960

-$2,109

Hokianga Link passengers carried

94

78

+16

384

390

-6

Hokianga Link fares collected

$513

$543

-$30

$2,115

$2,713

-$598

Far North Link passengers carried

189

405

-216

1,179

1,978

-799

Far North Link fares collected

$434

$1,024

-$590

$3,182

$5,004

-$1,822

Bream Bay Link passengers carried 

45

24

+21

197

126

+71

Bream Bay Link fares collected

$301

$86

+$215

$1,364

$454

+$910

Hikurangi Link passengers carried  

28

24

+4

78

114

-36

Hikurangi Link fares collected

$73

$63

+$10

$204

$329

-$125

Whangarei Heads Link passengers carried

11

24

-13

52

126

-74

Whangarei Heads Link fares collected

$47

$104

-$57

$225

$548

-$323

 

 

Bus Link stats for December2021 

(revenue ex GST)    

Actual   

Budget   

Variance   

Year/Date Actual   

Year/Date Budgeted   

Variance   

CityLink passengers carried  

 21,264 

22,420 

-1,156 

136,218  

160,338  

-24,120 

CityLink fares collected 

$22,912  

$28,733 

-$5,821 

$151,211 

$205,407 

-$54,196 

Mid North Link passengers carried 

 

124 

 

 

156 

 

-32 

 

813 

 

948 

 

-135 

Mid North Link fares collected  

$413  

$780 

-$367 

$2,264 

$4,740 

-$2,476 

Hokianga Link passengers carried 

58  

78  

-20 

442 

468 

-26 

Hokianga Link fares collected  

$327  

$543 

-$216 

$2,442 

$3,255 

-$813 

*Far North Link passengers carried 

219 

331 

-112 

1,398 

2,309  

-911 

*Far North Link fares collected  

$443 

$837 

-$394 

$3,625 

$5,842 

-$2,217 

Bream Bay Link passengers carried    

53  

30 

+23 

250 

156 

+94 

Bream Bay Link fares collected 

 $263 

$108 

+$155 

$1,627 

$561 

+$1,066 

Hikurangi Link passengers carried   

38  

30  

+8 

116  

144 

-28 

Hikurangi Link fares collected 

$57   

$78 

-$21 

$261 

$407 

-$146 

Whangarei Heads Link passengers carried   

30 

-21 

61 

156 

-95 

Whangarei Heads Link fares collected  

$30 

$130 

-$100 

$254 

$678 

-$424 

*December 2021 statistics  

 

 Please Note that the following services reflected above operate on Thursdays Only:  

·           Bream Bay Link 

·           Hikurangi Link 

·           Whangārei Heads Link  

 

Passengers Carried 

Passenger numbers remain low with the continued reluctance of adult passengers to travel on buses with scholars due to continued antisocial behavior. It is hoped that the introduction of the separate scholar buses in the early part of 2022 will help in alleviating this problem. 

 

In addition to the above, the negative commercial impact of COVID-19 coupled with decreased family disposable income had led to existing passengers not travelling as frequently. In addition, the move of SuperGold Card passenger to the Total Mobility Scheme has continued.  

 

The above has not been helped with the continued movement of COVID-19 Alert Levels and the resultant impact on the level of services operated. It is expected this scenario will worsen with the anticipated impact of the Omicron strain. 

 

From regular meetings with other regional councils, Waka Kotahi and the Ministry of Transport, it is apparent the above trend is national. Regional councils concern over decreasing passengers' numbers, decreasing farebox revenue and the difficulty in raising both national and local share funding coupled with the government's expectations on types of services to be delivered is constantly being passed on to Waka Kotahi and the Ministry of Transport. 

 

At the time of compiling this report, the impact rising fuel prices will have on the number of passengers carried is unknown. 

 

Far North Link 

Please note for the month of November 2021, the Far North Link service did not operate for a full week due to a member of the contracting company testing positive for COVID-19.  

 

Whangārei Heads Link 

This service will be removed at the end of January 2022 due to lack of passengers. 

 

Farebox Revenue 

Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency advised in December 2022 that they will extend their financial assistance for farebox revenue lost because of the COVID-19/Omicron related passenger decline through to 30 June 2022. This subsidy assistance is at the approved financial assistance rate of 54%. 

 

Staff have requested both Ministry of Transport and Waka Kotahi give serious consideration to the approval of medium/long term funding support for rural based social bus services. Continued short term decisions and/or no medium to long term funding certainty is placing these services in jeopardy of closure and rural communities left without alternative transport options. This has the potential for the increase of unlicensed, unregistered and unroadworthy vehicles and increased crashes on the region's roads. 

 

CityLink Bus Service Whangārei 

Staff are presently undertaking a complete review of the CityLink Bus Service timetables, routes, and vehicles. This review will include consideration of urban growth patterns, industrial and commercial growth patterns, population demographics, potential travel behaviour changes brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, vehicle utilisation, vehicle types and resultant costs. 

 

Rose Street Bus Terminus Update 

Tenders for the Phase 1 upgrade of the Rose St Terminal closed on Thursday 20 January 2022. Subject to an acceptable tender being awarded, the upgrade is scheduled for completion by May 2022. During the construction period, temporary loading/unloading facilities will be utilised in Vine St. 

 

An application for a full-time staff member to work from the Rose Street office has been approved subject to resolving security concerns. This application will be presented separately to the NTALG at the February 2022 meeting. This person will be the face of the Link Service in Northland and will assist passengers with enquiries, complaints, ticketing related issues etc. 

 

Summer Beach Bus Services 

Thursday only services were operated between Whangārei and Oceans Beach, and Whangārei and Ruakākā Beach.  

 

These services operated Thursday only from 23 December 2021 to 27 January 2022. Passenger loadings for the Oceans Beach Service were unfortunately very poor at an average of 1 passenger per trip. Passenger loadings for the Ruakākā Beach services averaged 6 passengers per trip. 

 

CityLink Promotions 

There have been several promotions over the last reporting period to encourage use of the CityLink bus services. These have included: 

 

The Silver Festival 2021 event held in Whangarei on 11, 12, 13 November 2021 was used to encourage people to use the CityLink bus service. This included a give-away morning tea for 6 people who caught “alternative transport”, like buses to the event.  

 

Free Travel was offered on scheduled public transport services from 1 October to 31 December 2021, to support the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. The fare for those persons making use of this offer was covered by Waka Kotahi at 100%.  Unfortunately, the uptake was very low. In addition, Super Saturday for vaccinations was advertised through the Civil Defence FB page. 

 

Snap a Selfie Wearing a Mask - A BusLink and CityLink promotion that ran from Tuesday 30 November 2021 to Tuesday 14 December 2021. Passengers were encouraged to wear masks, snap a selfie and upload it to the NRC URL platform to go in the draw to win one of 50 $30 grocery vouchers. 

 

Christmas Promotion for BusLink and CityLink - Free travel for all Services. This was held on Thursday 23 December 2021, with Christmas giveaways at the Rose Street bus terminus for passengers, along with a visit from Santa.    

 

Due to Covid-19 RED traffic light restrictions, efforts were directed more toward online promotions than promotions resulting in gatherings of people at the terminus. 

 

Due to the uncertainty over COVID-19 levels of lock down, this year’s Car Free Day has been cancelled.    


Total Mobility (TM) 

 

 

Total Clients 

Monthly Actual Expend 

Monthly Budgeted Expend 

Monthly Variance 

Year/Date Actual Expend 

Year/Date Budgeted Expend 

Annual Variance 

November 

2021 

1246 

$23,214 

$25,000 

-$7,786 

$109,273 

$125,000 

-$15,727 

December 2021 

1246 

$21,487 

$25,000 

-$3,513 

$130,759 

$150,000 

-$19,241 

 

RideWise Two (RW2) Upgrade  

RideWise 2 (RW2) is an upgrade from RideWise 1 (R1) which is the Total Mobility Scheme electronic swipe card system.  It’s an online system that manages Total Mobility nationally, swipe cards for clients, tracking of journeys and allows agencies to upload client assessment forms. 

 

Northland remains part of the national SME’s group (Subject Matter Expert). Workshops in 2021 continued, concentrating on consultation with transport operators, agencies, and other councils regarding all of the RW1 functions. 

 

Ongoing comparisons to RW2 to develop a new and improved system to be implemented in 2022 continues with Northland scheduled be the 2nd region to go live.  

 

National Total Mobility Card  

Northland, along with all other regions, is undertaking a staged implementation of the National Total Mobility card. The rationale behind the move to a national system is: 

·      To align with the drive toward a national bus ticketing system. 

·      A nationally recognised card to allow TM client’s the opportunity to use the card anywhere in the country and to reduce/eliminate issues with drivers not recognising the card which happens especially in the bigger regions with the smaller operators    

·      All regions had input and ownership. 

·      The card design is consistent with disability sector branding and guidelines  

 

The “Getting Out There” Expo promoting Abilities & International Day of People with Disabilities planned for Wednesday 1 December 2021 at which the TM Scheme was to be promoted, had to be cancelled due to Northland being at the RED traffic light setting for COVID-19.  

 

Investigation into Incidents of Double Dipping  

Northland is working with Wellington who have engaged a consultant to investigate “Double Dipping” of available funding support across all sectors of transport for peoples with disabilities.  

 

National Driver Training 

There is a national request for a more nationally consistent Total Mobility driver training programme. This request is to be presented to all TM Coordinators and Waka Kotahi with a recommendation that this form part of the Ministry of Transport review into the national TM Scheme review.   

   

 

ROAD SAFETY UPDATE 

Road Trauma Update - 2021 Year to Date, Road Fatalities Statistics 

Fatalities this year 

Far North 

Whangārei 

Kaipara 

Northland 

National 

Local roads 

4 

3 

4 

11 

178 

State highways 

7 

8 

7 

22 

142 

TOTAL 

11 

11 

11 

33 

320 

 

Road Trauma Update - 2022 Year to Date, Road Fatalities Statistics 

Fatalities this year 

Far North 

Whangārei 

Kaipara 

Northland 

National 

Local roads 

0 

1 

0 

1 

13 

State highways 

0 

0 

1 

1 

10 

TOTAL 

0 

1 

1 

2 

23  

 

Motorcycle Safety - Ride Forever (R4E) Rider Training Update 

·      R4E – 2020/2021 – 186 riders completed courses   

·      R4E – 2021/2022 – 88 riders completed courses year to date  

Driver Reviver/Fatigue Stops Cancelled

The planned event for 17 December was cancelled due to COVID-19 travel / border restrictions / operations.  

 

The two planned Driver Reviver / Fatigue Stops for 28 January 2022 (Anniversary Weekend) were cancelled due to poor weather forecast and Omicron & the red traffic light issues which also influenced cancelling the Waitangi Weekend Stop.

 

Road Safety Promotion/Media themes for December 2021 and January 2022 

Road safety promotional and media related themes for the above-mentioned months will concentrate around:    

·      Alcohol, Drugs, Fatigue, Seatbelts, Speed, Young Drivers, Motorcyclists. 

 

 

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 

 

NATIONAL   

Legislation review 

NEMA held a series of online introductory sessions in the week of 17 January to introduce proposed policy changes to the rewrite of the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act. The six sessions were well attended with over 350 external people able to join. The discussions at the meetings were highly constructive and provided valuable insights, including positive feedback.  

 

Main concerns raised related to the timeframe for engagement, and connection to other reforms.  

It should be noted that at this time NEMA have indicated that they are not seeking formal consultation or public consultation, they are seeking feedback on early options before final policy proposals are provided to Ministers. The opportunity for formal submissions (e.g. from CDEM Groups and local authorities) at the Select Committee process, will occur later in the year. 

  

COVID-19  

As most would be aware New Zealand is now moving into a new phase of the pandemic with the Government preparing for Omicron spreading rapidly in the community and consequential impacts on the Health sector, workforces, and supply chains.  The Government is implementing a three phased approach with changes to testing, case investigation, contract tracing, isolation, and quarantine requirements at each phase. 

 

NEMA and the CDEM groups continue to support the All-of-Government response to COVID-19 as New Zealand moves into COVID-19 Protection Framework Red setting and Phase One.  

 

CDEM Groups will not be required to provide COVID-19 welfare support under the Care in the Community programme to ensure they can focus on other concurrent emergency responses.  

 

The Northland CDEM Group has been focused upon planning for and responding to concurrent events in the region (including the Kaimaumau Fire, Ex-tropical cyclone Cody, Tonga volcanic eruption and tsunami and an additional tsunami advisory on 30 January).    As a result, a plan has been developed for staff continuity and the ability to carry out surveillance testing for COVID-19 for business continuity and critical service provision purposes.   The group has secured stocks of Rapid Antigen Tests and will move to surveillance testing if or when required.    

 

National Tsunami Evacuation Map  

NEMA is currently building an online map which will allow people anywhere in Aotearoa to find out if they are in a tsunami evacuation zone. The map will take tsunami evacuation data from the sixteen different regional tsunami mapping services and will be built with accessibility in the front of mind.  

 

This national map is expected to be ready in the first half of 2022 and will initially be released as a public education tool on the Get Ready website. Once complete, this will be promoted with an awareness campaign encouraging people to familiarise themselves with their evacuation zones.  

 

REGIONAL  

Kaimaumau Fire 

Northland CDEM has been providing Welfare and liaison support to the FENZ lead response to the Kaimaumau fire since mid-December 2021. As part of the Welfare arrangements CDEM have provided accommodation and support on three separate occasions to evacuees from the fire, including over the Christmas and New Year periods.  There has also been ongoing liaison with FENZ to assist with planning and welfare related matters.  FENZA have indicated that they are starting to scale back resourcing to the fire and move to a recovery structure.  Again, CDEM has been contributing to the recovery planning and arrangements as an advisor.    

 

Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano in Tonga – Tsunami Impacts at Tutukaka  

GNS Science is the mandated and official scientific assessor of earthquake/volcano/potential tsunami for New Zealand. GNS have said that assessing this tsunami was different from assessing earthquake-source tsunamis that occur more frequently. Cyclone Cody was also a complicating factor. The storm caused heightened swells around the east coast of the North Island and made GNS data more difficult to decipher.  Based on GNS assessments, the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) issued a National Advisory: Tsunami Activity for the east and north coast of the North Island and the Chatham Islands around 8:30pm on Saturday. This was extended to the West Coast of the South Island around 9:40am on Sunday based on further observations from the network. NEMA warned people to expect strong and unusual currents and unpredictable surges at the shore. 

 

Northland CDEM team members were monitoring the effects of Cyclone Cody and were in communication with both NEMA and GNS Science during the assessment process which followed the volcanic eruption. At the same time there was a Kaimaumau fire evacuation advised by Fire and Emergency NZ and a member of the CDEM team supported this.

 

Stakeholders were informed including community response groups of the national advisory and also sent out on social media sites.

Northland CDEM team members received reports from campgrounds in the Far North that had been evacuated as a precaution after elevated sea levels/wave heights were observed and were advised of damage at the Tutukaka Marina. 

In the following days, the Maritime and CDEM teams supported the Tutukaka Marina and trust members with clean up, salvage, public information and safety.

 

Tsunami sirens were not used in this instance due to the national advisory level and that the current network cannot be activated in isolation by location, so the entire east coast of the Whangarei district siren network would have to be activated, which in this instance was not necessary and not aligned with standard operating procedures.

  

MARITIME 

Commercial Shipping 

Shipping was relatively quiet over this period with no incidents of note. An upcoming port and harbour safety code review is due in March, and stakeholders have been updating their processes and documents in preparation.  

 

Recreational Boating 

The maritime team destroyed 6 vessels from 3 harbours, with 4 more lined up. One vessel wrecked at Ruakākā due to the inexperience of those onboard. Two vessels were saved from sinking in the Bay of Islands by the maritime team. One vessel sunk in Parua bay, and a large barge sunk at Opononi.  

 

The team are dealing with a number of vessel owners with derelict vessels, no mooring, and little ability to manage and maintain their vessel.  

 

General 

There were 44 incidents overall, including the above wrecks, and a large number of mooring related incidents. The team carried out 15 days of bylaw and education patrols over summer, with two vessels over the east coast harbours and Kai Iwi lakes. Assistance was provided for a medi-vac by helicopter of an injured person off a vessel and assisted with several breakdowns.  

 

The Tonga volcano caused a significant damage from a Tsunami in Tutukaka harbour, with 6 vessels sunk and damage to the fuel jetty and several pontoons. Luckily a newly installed cut off at the fuel jetty prevented a significant spill. The maritime team spent several days assisting with the clean-up of the debris. The harbourmaster liaised with the insurers and marina manager to assist with a complex incident and multiple claims.  

 

The tender for the replacement work vessel was tendered out and awarded to CIRCA in Whangarei.  

 

  

RIVERS AND NATURAL HAZARDS 

RIVERS 

Long Term Plan Projects 

Rivers 

Comments 

Awanui 

Work on the Northern Floodway Benching is progressing well. The Kaitaia Rugby Club Floodway Benching and Mathew’s Park and Switzer Spillway tender has closed and will be awarded 2nd week in February.  

Quarry Road & SH10 Bridges improved flow designs have been completed. Physical work to start in March.  

Otīria/Moerewa 

Cultural Assessment was completed in January, this was well received and attended by the hapū. Enabling work to remove asbestos waste has been completed clearing the Stage 1 lower spillway work to begin in mid-February.  

Matangirau  

Staff expect benching work to be underway in late February.  

Kerikeri 

Waipapa Industrial Estate Flood Mitigation- site walkover meeting was held with the contractor and engineer with work to begin mid-February.  

 

NATURAL HAZARDS   

Work Streams    

Status    

Comments    

Region-Wide River Flood Mapping    

100% complete    

The flood maps went live at the end of November 2021. Press releases went out as well as a notice in the regional rate payer's letter. The feedback from consultants, practitioners and from the public (few) has been very positive following several workshops. 

Whangārei (CBD) River Catchment Flood Model   

60% complete 

Upgrade of the hydraulic model including new structures, updated LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and sea level rise values and recalibration. Initial draft outcomes were discussed and reviewed at the end of December 2021. A specific river / stream structures inspections are underway. This hydraulic model will be shared with WDC (Whangarei District Council) as they, in parallel, are developing their storm water model. The 2nd draft outcomes of the hydraulic model are expected in March 2022. 

Website Natural Hazards Portal   

80% complete 

Morphum Environmental have been engaged to develop the portal. The third phase of the development of the portal is underway, e.g., landing page, flooding and Te Ao Māori aspects, story maps, and sea level rise viewer. It is our vision to ‘go public’ by the end of June 2022 after delays due to resourcing challenges, and re-prioritization of workloads, by both parties. 

Raupo Drainage Scheme – Coastal Flood Hazard Analysis & Mitigation Options  

70% complete 

We have engaged Water Technology (WT) to do detailed hydraulic modelling from all perspectives, i.e., catchment, river and most importantly coastal.  

The objective is to establish a detailed base model and to develop flood hazard mitigation options, particularly from a coastal perspective, and adaptation planning.  

The project team consists of NRC and KDC staff, Chair of the Drainage Committee, and the Consultants. NRC are taking the modelling analysis lead on this project, i.e. contract management (NRC Budget). KDC are collating the assets data covered under their budgets. 

Surveys, data collection, assets inspection and ‘building’ of the hydraulic model is underway. First draft ‘results’ are expected by the end January of 2022. 

Natural Hazards technical and planning support to District Councils on Plan Changes and Rules 

Ongoing 

Following the publication of our coastal hazard maps and the regionwide flood maps, complimentary to the priority rivers flood maps, further technical, consultative, and planning support / guidance is provided to the DCs. This follows the commitments to DCs prior to the publication of the coastal hazard maps. 

 

CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE  

Work Streams    

Status    

Comments    

NRC Climate Change Strategy “Ngā Taumata o te Moana” and implementation plan  

Progressing Actions 

Progress on recommended actions in the implementation plan were reported on at the Climate Change Working Party (CCWP) meeting on Wednesday 10 November and updated subsequently. The next update will be presented at the CCWP meeting on 23 February 2022. 

Te Taitokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy   

Draft V2.3 – council workshops 

 

85% complete 

Workshops have been held with all Councils, Te Taitokerau Māori and Council (TTMAC) as well as tangata whenua representative groups. The draft final Strategy was presented on 29 November to the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee (JCCAC) for acceptance and recommendation for Councils to adopt by March 2022. 

The (draft) Coastal Adaptation programme has been developed, including exposure assessment of 63 coastal communities, to support TAs to select sites for community adaptation planning. 

Output of this assessment is one of the data corner stones for the Northland Lifeline Group Climate Change Assessment conducted by Tonkin & Taylor which is funded through CDEM; NRC being one of the participants (not the lead). 

Te Taitokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy - Adaptation Programme; Pilot Projects 

Ongoing 

Regional Council has made funding available, up to a maximum of $45,000 each, for the three district councils to support the implementation of their respective pilot projects from our Climate Change budget (Te Roopu Tiaki Hapori – Community Resilience). Funding is made available through a business case application. KDC submitted the business case and was awarded the funds. WDC are in the process of submitting and FNDC are ‘not ready yet.’ 

National Science Challenge (The Deep South): Living with Uncertainties – Stakeholder Grand in Aid 

 

This directly supports the above Strategy for the implementation phase, and more particularly for the immediate timeframe, the districts’ pilot projects on coastal communities' adaptation plans. 

Scoping, research, collaboration development; commenced November 2021. 

 

Initial phase 

35% complete 

Following a joint application with GNS funding was granted (led by NIWA) for $32,640 for the initial phase with up to $320k over a three-year period. Project and contract (including financial) management, including reporting, is being administered by GNS. All regional councils are part of this project in a collaborative way. 

 

The research support is focusing on How can a region enable inclusive, coordinated, effective adaptation planning to deliver positive outcomes for diverse communities?” 

  

The three focus areas being: Self-directed Adaptation for iwi/hapū, Coordinated and Tailored Adaptation Approaches to Place, Integrating Non-local Supporting Mechanisms for Adaptation. 

 

This project is developed in collaboration with the below WDC Framework development. 

 

Whangārei District Council, on behalf of the northern Councils is investigating the development of a Te Ao Māori Decision-Making Framework.  This is a project that seeks to co-design and develop a Te Ao Māori Decision Making Framework that responds directly to the way decisions are being made by local authorities, in particular climate change (due March 2022 

 

 

NORTHLAND WIDE LIDAR SURVEY 

Work Streams    

Status    

Comments    

Regional LiDAR Survey 

In progress 

Staff are nearing final QA/QC checks and anticipate final deliver in 1st Quarter.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 8.4

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Emergency Services Fund 2020-2021 Report

From:

Victoria Harwood, Pou Tiaki Hapori - GM Community Resilience

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Victoria Harwood, Pou Tiaki Hapori - GM Community Resilience, on 16 February 2022

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

The purpose of this report is to outline the Emergency Services Fund (ESF) uptake and end of year 2020-2021 allocation and outcomes.

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Emergency Services Fund 2020-2021 Report’ by Victoria Harwood, Pou Tiaki Hapori - GM Community Resilience and dated 10 January 2022, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

The 2020-2021 Emergency Services Fund total was $972,000.00. The fund was allocated per year over 3 years up to 2021 to the following:

 

Northland’s rescue helicopter service ($525,000 a year)

Surf Life Saving Northern Region ($201,000 a year)

St Johns Northern Region ($90,000 a year)

Coastguard Northern Region ($84,000 a year).

 

Extra funding available in the reserve fund of $71,696.00 was also distributed proportionately as approved by council in December 2020 and can be seen included in the final funding uptake figures below.

 

 

Emergency Service provider

Funding purpose

Annual Allocation (in each of 3 years (GST exclusive)

Funding uptake as of 30 June 2021 FY (2020-2021)

Northland Emergency Services Trust

 

Operational costs for the air rescue and ambulance services

$525K per year

$566,822.66

Surf Life Saving Northern Region

 

Professional guards at popular beaches outside volunteer paid hours

$201k per year

$217,012.11

St John Northern Region

 

Partially-fund replacement of Northland ambulances

$90k per year

$97,169.70

Coastguard Northern Region

 

Operating, support and training costs for Northland units

$84k per year

$90,691.63

 

 

 

Engagement and Promotion

The Community Engagement team continue to undertake publicity and promotion of these emergency services, raising awareness of council’s support for them. The team have been promoting our involvement with these life-saving services via a range of channels including radio, social media, print, rates brochures, stories, signage and promotional boards at the beach. Of note, we supported NEST (Northland Emergency Services Trust)’s annual appeal with radio advertising as part of More FM’s all-day breakfast promotion, helping to raise funds for NEST while showcasing our partnership and support.

The team are also working on a story with SLSNR (Surf Life Saving Northern Region) for council’s Our Northland web content with accompanying social posts – celebrating their success/hard work over the summer session. The budget for engagement and promotion remained at $10k as the previous year.

 

Annual Reports and Service Performance Measures

As a condition of the ESF grant, each of the recipients are required to report on their financial and service performance measures as well as submit a report on the use of the ESF grant. This information provided by the fund recipients is summarised below.

 

Northland Emergency Services Trust (NEST)

Over the last twelve months, NEST has undertaken a Transition Programme to combine existing NEST and Auckland Rescue Helicopter Trust (ARHT) operational capability (Northern Rescue), and responsibility for contract service delivery into Northern Rescue. This was a requirement under the National Ambulance Sector Office (NASO) contract.

In simple terms, the Trust is the asset owner, and Northern Rescue is the operator. Northern Rescue has established a programme of work to deliver on both the Strategic and Transition Plans throughout 2021 and into early 2022.

 

 

The 2020-2021 stats (above) show 1289 revenue hours against a budget forecast of 1135 hours. Non-revenue hours have reduced from the 2019-20 year when we were commissioning the new aircraft, but still reflect a higher level of training hours required for crew.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The service covers across Northland, the following is a breakdown of the missions completed over the last twelve months by location (constituency).

Other activities undertaken to improve performance and services this year include and internal audit to provide a level of safety and compliance assurance and to identify opportunities for continuous improvement. Safety Management System meetings, cultural competency, and media updates.

 

NEST is very grateful for the financial support we receive from Northland Regional Council.

 

Surf Life Saving Northern Region (SLSNR)

SLSNR continue to allocate the NRC funding to deliver efficient and effective services aligned with the NRC’s strategic priorities including building Safe and Resilient Communities, providing continuous improvement in water quality, and building a strong economy.

 

Services provided in Northland include:

 

·    27 rescues

·    46 patient assists

·    3,440 public assists

·    24 major first aid provisions

·    139 minor first aid provisions

·    15 water searches

 

Provided by 17, 252 volunteer hours during 2020-2021.

 

St John Northern Region

In 2016 the NRC funded a fully equipped ambulance, vehicle 157, over the 2020-2021 financial year, this ambulance attended 188 incidents. NRC funding also contributes to an additional four ambulances in the Northern Region vehicles 155, 721, 980 and 258.

 

St John Northern Region continue to be grateful for the support shown by the NRC.

 

Coastguard Northern Region

Coastguard provides the primary maritime search and rescue service in Northland and across New Zealand. NRC funding provides services across 9 locations in Northland including, Whangaroa, Bay of Islands, Whangaruru, Tutukaka, Whangarei, Kaipara, North Kaipara, Hokianga, Houhora and the Northland Coastguard Air Patrol based near the Bay of Islands.

 

On 30 June 2020 – the Coastguard Northern Region ceased, and all Coastguard regions were merged into Project Horizon to become one national organisation.

 

Coastguard NZ continue to provide their services including maritime search and rescue, provision of critical safety information and communication services and delivery of boating education and community initiatives.

 

Annual reports for SLSNR and Coastguard can be found online at:

 

SLSNR - http://www.lifesaving.org.nz/about-us/slsnr-annual-reports

 

Coastguard Northern Region - https://www.coastguard.nz/about-us/annual-reports/

 

Attachment 1 – St John Annual Report for Northland 2020-2021

 

Attachment 2 – NEST Annual Report 2020-2021

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: St John Annual Report 2020 - 2021

Attachment 2: NEST Annual Report 2020 - 2021   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.4

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.4

22 February 2022Attachment 2

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 8.5

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Reporting on Long Term Plan 2021-2031 performance measures for quarters one and two of the 2021/22 year

From:

Robyn Broadhurst, Policy Specialist

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 10 February 2022

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

This report presents a summary of the results of council’s Long Term Plan key performance indicators for quarters one and two of the 2021/22 financial year, being July to December inclusive.

This report proposes an alteration to the reporting format, from what was agreed by council in December 2021.

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Reporting on Long Term Plan 2021-2031 performance measures for quarters one and two of the 2021/22 year’ by Robyn Broadhurst, Policy Specialist and dated 10 February 2022, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

The Long Term Plan 2021-2031 includes 31 key performance indicators that measure aspects of council’s service provision across three activity areas:

· Te Taiao | Natural environment

· Manawaroa te hapori | Community resilience

· Hautūtanga ā rohe | Regional leadership

Each performance measure provides a snapshot of the activity’s performance. The frequency of reporting against the measures varies, with the majority being reported on annually at the end of the financial year.

There are ten performance measures that we report on either quarterly, annually (in quarter two) or biannually (quarters two and four). Of these ten, five have achieved their targets, three are on track to achieve the end of year target, and two have not achieved their targets for the period. 

At the council meeting on 14 December 2021, council agreed to change the Terms of Reference of the Audit and Risk Subcommittee to be the delegated body responsible for undertaking a ‘deep dive’ into the quarterly reports, provided a summary report is then provided to full council.

Subsequent analysis of the reporting periods for the measures against meeting dates for the year has highlighted that this would result in a significant lag of up to three months in the reporting of data to the committee, and council.

It is recommended that the delegation to the Audit and Risk subcommittee be retained, with the intention that the comprehensive ‘deep dive’ of quarterly reporting be carried out annually at the end of each full reporting period. The information provided to the audit and risk committee for each measure would include the potential impact of the measure on council deliverables and budget and any mitigation options going forward. It is recommended that in addition to this, regular quarterly reporting to council continue with the same detailed information provided but only for those measures not tracking to achievement.  

This report therefore provides this recommended level of reporting for quarters one and two of the 2021/22 financial year. Only two of council’s 31 measures are not tracking to achievement at this stage, as set out in the table below.

Hautūtanga ā rohe | Regional leadership

3.1 Governance

Level of service

Target

Compliance

Potential impact

Potential impact to budget

Mitigation options

Percentage of official information requests that are responded to within 20 working days

100% compliance

Q1: 91.70% – not achieved

Q2: 86.70 – not achieved

 

Details on individual requests are reported through the monthly CE’s Report

Delays for customers seeking information, reputational impact

N/A

We’re looking to improve our administrative processes so that these types of errors do not occur again.

Percentage of time that elected members attend council meetings

90% compliance

Q1: 88.90% – not achieved

Q2: 97% – achieved

 

Reduced quality of decision making

N/A

Non-achievement of this measure was due to two councillors having a leave of absence for medical reasons.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 9.1

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Receipt of Committee Minutes

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Auriole Ruka, Pou Manawhakahaere - GM Governance and Engagement, on

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the minutes of the:

·        Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Meeting Minutes -  10 November 2021

·        Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee - 15 November 2021

·        Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee Minutes – 29 November 2021

·        Regional Transport Committee – 8 December 2021

·        Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee – 13 December 2021

·        Te Oneroa-A-Tōhē Board Minutes – 17 December 2021

be received.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Meeting Minutes

Attachment 2: Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee

Attachment 3: Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee Minutes

Attachment 4: Regional Transport Committee Minutes

Attachment 5: Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee Minutes

Attachment 6: Te Oneroa-A-Tōhē Board Minutes   


Council Meeting  ITEM: 9.1

22 February 2022Attachment 1

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 9.1

22 February 2022Attachment 2

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 9.1

22 February 2022Attachment 3

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 9.1

22 February 2022Attachment 4

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 9.1

22 February 2022Attachment 5

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting  ITEM: 9.1

22 February 2022Attachment 6

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 9.2

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist

Authorised by:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on date 16 February 2022

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings’ be received.

 

Water and Land Working Party (Councillor Blaikie)

The Water and Land Working Party met on 8 December 2021. The topics for discussion included:

·        An overview was provided on Dung Beetle releases by New Zealand councils.

·        Land Management Approach.

Following discussion, there was no action required.

 

 

.    


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                                           ITEM: 10.0

22 February 2022

 

TITLE:

Business with the Public Excluded

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider the confidential matters detailed below for the reasons given.

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendations

1.            That the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider confidential matters.

2.            That the general subject of the matters to be considered whilst the public is excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to this matter, and the specific grounds under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution, are as follows:

Item No.

Item Issue

Reasons/Grounds

10.1

Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - Council Meeting 14 December 2021

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting -.

10.2

Human Resources Report

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a).

10.3

Strategic Review

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to prevent the disclosure or use of official information for improper gain or improper advantage s7(2)(j).

10.4

Introduction of Continuity Capital Private Equity No. 7 Fund into the Long Term Investment Fund

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to prevent the disclosure or use of official information for improper gain or improper advantage s7(2)(j).

3.            That the Independent Financial Advisors be permitted to stay during business with the public excluded.

Considerations

1.    Options

Not applicable. This is an administrative procedure.

2.    Significance and Engagement

This is a procedural matter required by law. Hence when assessed against council policy is deemed to be of low significance.

3.    Policy and Legislative Compliance

The report complies with the provisions to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting as detailed in sections 47 and 48 of the Local Government Official Information Act 1987.

4.    Other Considerations

Being a purely administrative matter; Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.

 



[1] Including the use of land, and river and lake beds, as well as those relating to water and discharges