Council Tuesday 28 June 2022 at 10.30am
|
|
|
|
Council Meeting
28 June 2022
Northland Regional Council Agenda
Meeting to be held in the Council Chamber
36 Water Street, Whangārei
on Tuesday 28 June 2022, commencing at 10.30am
Recommendations contained in the council agenda are NOT council decisions. Please refer to council minutes for resolutions.
RĪMITI (Item) Page
1.0 Ngā Mahi Whakapai (Housekeeping)
Key Health and Safety points to note:
· If the fire alarm goes off – exit down the stairwell to the assembly point which is the visitor carpark.
· Earthquakes – drop, cover and hold
· Visitors please make sure you have signed in at reception, and that you sign out when you leave. Please wear your name sticker.
· The toilets are on the opposite side of the stairwell.
· Please adhere to the recommended Covid alert guidance that applies.
2.0 Karakia Timatanga – Tauāki ā roto (Opening karakia)
3.0 Ngā Whakapahā (apologies)
4.0 Ngā Whakapuakanga (DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST)
5.0 Ngā Whakaae Miniti me te Mahere Mahi (Council Minutes and Action Sheet)
5.1 Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meeting 24 May 2022 and Annual Plan Deliberations 24 May 2022 6
5.2 Receipt of Action Sheet 16
6.0 Ngā Ripoata Putea (Financial Reports)
6.1 Financial Report to 31 May 2022 18
7.0 Ngā Take (Decision Making Matters)
7.1 Rates for the year 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023 23
7.2 Adoption of Annual Plan 2022/23 43
7.3 Adoption of User Fees and Charges 2022/23 | Kaupapa Here a Utu 116
7.4 Biosecurity Operational Plan 2022-2023 181
7.5 Submissions on freshwater and indigenous biodiversity national instruments 211
7.6 Te Mana o Te Wai Funding 214
7.7 Tangata Whenua Environmental Monitoring Fund - draft allocation policy 218
7.8 Formal endorsement of submission made into the National Adaptation Plan by the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee 224
8.0 Ngā Ripoata Mahi (Operational Reports)
8.1 Chair's Report to Council 267
8.2 Chief Executive’s Report to Council 269
9.0 Receipt of Committee Minutes and Working Party/Group Updates
9.1 Receipt of Committee Minutes 303
9.2 Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings 322
10.0 Kaupapa ā Roto (Business with the Public Excluded) 324
10.1 Confirmation of confidential minutes - council meeting 24 May 2022
10.2 Human Resources Report - May 2022
10.3 Regional Projects Reserve: Investment proposal for Kaipara Water Scheme
10.4 Purchase of Whangārei CBD Properties
ACC - Accident Compensation Corporation ALGIM - Association of Local Government Information Management AMA - Aquaculture Management Area AMP - Asset Management Plan/Activity Management Plan AP - Annual Plan BOI - Bay of Islands BOPRC - Bay of Plenty Regional Council CAPEX - Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets) CBEC - Community, Business and Environment Centre CCO – Council Controlled Organisation CCTO – Council Controlled Trading Organisation CDEM - Civil Defence Emergency Management CEEF – Chief Executives Environment Forum CEG - Co-ordinating Executive Group CEO - Chief Executive Officer CIMS - Co-ordinated Incident Management System (emergency management structure) CMA - Coastal Marine Area CPCA - Community Pest Control Areas CRI - Crown Research Institute DHB - District Health Board DOC - Department of Conservation DP – District Plan E350 – Extension 350 programme ECA - Environmental Curriculum Award ECAN - Environment Canterbury EECA - Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority EF - Environment Fund EMA - Employers and Manufacturers Association EOC - Emergency Operations Centre EPA - Environmental Protection Authority ETS - Emissions Trading Scheme FDE - Farm Dairy Effluent FNDC - Far North District Council FNHL - Far North Holdings Limited FPP - First Past the Post GE - Genetic Engineering GIS - Geographic Information System GMO - Genetically Modified Organism HBRC - Hawke's Bay Regional Council HEMP - Hapū Environmental Management Plan Horizons - Brand name of Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council HR - Human Resources HSNO - Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act HSWA - Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 IEMP - Iwi Environmental Management Plan ILGACE - Iwi and Local Government Chief Executives Forum IPPC - Invited Private Plan Change IRIS - Integrated Regional Information System KDC - Kaipara District Council KPI - Key Performance Indicator LAWA – Land, Air, Water Aotearoa LEA - Local Electoral Act 2001 LGA - Local Government Act 2002 LGNZ - Local Government New Zealand LGOIMA - Local Government Official Information & Meetings Act 1987 LIDAR – Light detection and ranging LTI – Long time injury LTP - Long Term Plan MBIE – Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment MFE - Ministry for the Environment MFL – Māori Freehold Land MHWS - Mean High Water Springs MMH - Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited MNZ - Maritime New Zealand MOH - Ministry of Health MOT - Ministry of Transport |
MPI - Ministry for Primary Industries MSD - Ministry of Social Development NCMC - National Crisis Management Centre NDHB - Northland District Health Board NEMA – National Emergency Management Agency NES - National Environmental Standards NFT – Northland Forward Together NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation NIF - Northland Intersectoral Forum NINC - Northland Inc. Limited NIWA - National Institute of Water and Atmosphere NORTEG - Northland Technical Advisory Group NPS - National Policy Statement NZCPS - New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement NZRC - New Zealand Refining Company (Marsden Point) NZTA – Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency NZTE - New Zealand Trade and Enterprise NZWWA - New Zealand Water and Wastes Association OFI - Opportunity for Improvement\ OPEX – Operating Expenditures OSH - Occupational Safety & Health OTS – Office of Treaty Settlements PCBU - Person Conducting Business or Undertaking PGF – Provincial Growth Fund PPE - Personal Protective Equipment RAP - Response Action Plan RBI - Regional Broadband Initiative RCP - Regional Coastal Plan RFI - Request for Information RFP - Request for Proposal RLTP - Regional Land Transport Plan RMA - Resource Management Act 1991 RMG - Resource Managers Group (Regional Councils) RMZ - Riparian Management Zone ROI - Return on Investment RP – Regional Plan RPMP - Regional Pest Management Plan RPMS - Regional Pest Management Strategy RPS - Regional Policy Statement RPTP – Regional Public Transport Plan RRSAP – Regional Road Safety Action Plan RSG – Regional Sector Group RSHL - Regional Software Holdings Ltd RTC - Regional Transport Committee RTO - Regional Tourism Organisation SIG – Special Interest Group SIPO - Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives SITREP - Situation Report SOE - State of Environment (or) State Owned Enterprise SOI – Statement of Intent SOLGM - Society of Local Government Managers STV - Single Transferable Vote TAG - Technical Advisory Group Tier 1 - Site level plan or response for an oil spill Tier 2 - Regional level plan or response to an oil spill Tier 3 - National level plan or response to an oil spill TLA - Territorial Local Authority – City & District Councils TON – Top of the North (regions) TTMAC – Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party TTNEAP – Tai Tokerau Northland Economic Action Plan TMP - Treasury Management Plan TOR - Terms of Reference TPK - Te Puni Kōkiri (Ministry of Maori Development) TUANZ - Telecommunications Users Association of NZ UNISA - Upper North Island Strategic Alliance WDC - Whangarei District Council WHHIF - Whangarei Harbour Health Improvement Fund WRC - Waikato Regional Council WSMP - Workplace Safety Management Practices |
Council Meeting item: 5.1
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Confirmation of Minutes - Council Meeting 24 May 2022 and Annual Plan Deliberations 24 May 2022 |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist |
Authorised by: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 21 June 2022 |
That the minutes of the council meeting held on 24 May 2022 and the Annual Plan Deliberations held on 24 May 2022 be confirmed as true and correct record.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Minutes of the council meeting - 24 May 2022 ⇩
Attachment 2: Minutes of the Annual Plan Deliberations - 24 May 2022 ⇩
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Receipt of Action Sheet |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist |
Authorised by: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 21 June 2022 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
The purpose of this report is to enable the meeting to receive the current action sheet.
That the action sheet be received.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Council Action Sheet - June 2022 ⇩
Council Meeting item: 6.1
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Financial Report to 31 May 2022 |
From: |
Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and Taka Skipwith, Financial Accountant |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 21 June 2022 |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary
This report is to inform council of the year to date (YTD) financial result to May 2022. Council has achieved a YTD surplus after transfers to and from reserves of $4.89M, which is $75K favourable to budget (April YTD per agenda was $1.5M favourable to budget and then updated verbally at the meeting to $1.1M). This result includes May losses on externally managed funds of ($877K).
That the report ‘Financial Report to 31 May 2022’ by Vincent McColl, Financial Accountant and Taka Skipwith, Financial Accountant and dated 14 June 2022, be received.
Background/Tuhinga
Revenue
Year to date revenue is $59.52M, which is $2.27M or 3.7% below budget.
Council Meeting item: 6.1
28 June 2022
The finance team are actively working towards including all unreported expenditure for this financial year and are identifying carry forward expenditure for the next financial year.
Salary Variances
Across council there is a $1.33M (April YTD: $1.28M) favourable salaries variance predominantly due to the time to complete recruitment of positions identified in the LTP (Long Term Plan) and some vacancies already present at the end of 2020/21. The salary variance is broken down below:
|
May YTD |
April YTD |
Gross salary variance |
$1.25M |
$1.19M |
Add: unbudgeted KMR salaries offset with budgeted grant expenditure |
$523K |
$441K |
Less: Subsidised work programmes |
($152K) |
($133K) |
Less: Annual leave earned not taken |
($286K) |
($218K) |
Net salary variance |
$1.33M |
$1.28M |
Transfers to reserves
For the year to date there has been a net transfer to reserves of $5.3M compared to a budgeted net transfer to reserves of $2.78M. This is predominantly due to:
$1.68M more than budgeted transfers to flood infrastructure river reserves due to higher than budgeted subsidies for capital flood works.
$130K higher than budgeted transfers from the investment growth reserves due, due to timing of economic development grants.
$105K more than budgeted transfers to transport reserves due to lower than budgeted YTD expenditure. This consists of $112K for Far North transport reserve offset by ($7K) for the Whangarei transport reserve.
$650K more than budgeted transfers to the Kaipara Moana Remediation reserve due to the Kaipara Maurikura not yet requiring funding this financial year.
$1.5M lower than budgeted transfers from the enterprise system reserve representing lower costs than budgeted at this stage of the project.
$99K lower than budged transfers to Sporting Facilities Reserve, due to works not occurring as budgeted.
$1.1M lower than budget transfer to group investment reserves, due to poor return on long term funds.
Capital Expenditure
Capital expenditure of $5.64M is lower than the budget of $5.95M due to the timing of expenditure on flood works work programmes.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 7.1
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Rates for the year 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023 |
From: |
Casey Mitchell, Management Accountant; Kim Harvey, Assistant Management Accountant and Shivam Shivam, Planning and Reporting Officer |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 22 June 2022 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
Under sections 23, 24, 57 and 58 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 (LGRA), the council is required to set its rates, due dates and penalty regime by resolution.
This paper provides for the council to set its rates, due dates, and penalty regime for the year commencing on 1 July 2022 and ending on 30 June 2023.
This paper has been prepared in accordance with the revenue and financing policy and rates section (including the funding impact statement) contained within the 2022-2023 Annual Plan.
1. That the report ‘Rates for the year 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023 by Casey Mitchell, Management Accountant; Kim Harvey, Assistant Management Accountant and Shivam Shivam, Planning and Reporting Officer and dated 9 May 2022, be received.
2. That council notes that it has had regard to section 100T of the Biosecurity Act 1993 and confirms that its analysis of Section 100T of the Biosecurity Act 1993, as included in the Long Term Plan 2021-2031, remains appropriate in relation to setting the Pest Management Rate for 2022-2023.
3. That the Northland Regional Council resolves to set the following rates under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 (LGRA) for the financial year commencing 1 July 2022 and ending 30 June 2023:
a. Targeted council services rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is calculated on the total projected capital value, as determined by the certificate of projected valuation of each constituent district in the Northland region. An additional $1.73 (including GST) per each rateable separately used or inhabited part (SUIP) of a rating unit is to be assessed across the Whangārei constituency to provide funding for the ongoing maintenance of the Hātea River Channel. The rate is differentiated by location in the Northland region and assessed as a fixed amount per each rateable separately used or inhabited part (SUIP) of a rating unit in the Far North and Whangārei districts, and on each rateable rating unit (RU) in the Kaipara district. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $140.02 per SUIP
Kaipara District $169.14 per RU
Whangārei District $158.26 per SUIP
The Whangārei District targeted council services rate amount of $158.26 (including GST) per SUIP includes funding for the Hātea River Channel amount of $1.73 (including GST).
b. Targeted land and freshwater management rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is assessed on the land value of each rateable rating unit in the region. The rate is set per dollar of land value. The rate per dollar of land value is different for each constituent district because the rate is allocated based on projected land value, as provided for in section 131 of the LGRA. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $0.0003835 per dollar of land value
Kaipara District $0.0003565 per dollar of land value
Whangārei District $0.0002780 per dollar of land value
c. Targeted pest management rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is calculated on the total projected capital value, as determined by the certificate of projected valuation of each constituent district in the Northland region. The rate is a fixed amount, differentiated by location in the Northland region. The rate will be assessed on each rateable separately used or inhabited part (SUIP) of a rating unit in the Far North and Whangārei districts, and each rateable rating unit (RU) in the Kaipara District. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $71.77 per SUIP
Kaipara District $86.69 per RU
Whangārei District $80.23 per SUIP
d. Targeted flood infrastructure rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is a fixed amount assessed on each rateable separately used or inhabited part (SUIP) of a rating unit in the Far North and Whangārei districts, and each rateable rating unit (RU) in the Kaipara District. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $33.24 per SUIP
Kaipara District $33.24 per RU
Whangārei District $33.24 per SUIP
e. Targeted emergency and hazard management rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is calculated on the total projected capital value, as determined by the certificate of projected valuation of each constituent district in the Northland region. The rate is a fixed amount, differentiated by location in the Northland region. The rate will be assessed on each rateable separately used or inhabited part (SUIP) of a rating unit in the Far North and Whangārei districts, and each rateable rating unit (RU) in the Kaipara District. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $40.15 per SUIP
Kaipara District $48.50 per RU
Whangārei District $44.88 per SUIP
f. Targeted emergency services rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is a fixed amount assessed on each rateable separately used or inhabited part (SUIP) of a rating unit in the Far North and Whangārei districts, and each rateable rating unit (RU) in the Kaipara District. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $11.60 per SUIP
Kaipara District $11.60 per RU
Whangārei District $11.60 per SUIP
g. Targeted regional sporting facilities rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is a fixed amount assessed on each rateable separately used or inhabited part (SUIP) of a rating unit in the Far North and Whangārei districts, and each rateable rating unit (RU) in the Kaipara District. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $16.60 per SUIP
Kaipara District $16.60 per RU
Whangārei District $16.60 per SUIP
h. Targeted regional economic development rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. This rate is assessed on the land value of each rateable rating unit in the region. The rate is set per dollar of land value. The rate per dollar of land value is different for each constituent district, because the rate is allocated based on projected land value, as provided for in section 131 of the LGRA. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $0.0000260 per dollar of land value
Kaipara District $0.0000242 per dollar of land value
Whangārei District $0.0000188 per dollar of land value
i. Targeted Whangārei transport rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is a fixed amount assessed on each rateable separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit (SUIP) in the Whangārei District. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Whangārei District $38.47 per SUIP
j. Targeted Far North transport rate
A targeted rate as authorised by the LGRA. The rate is a fixed amount assessed on each rateable separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit (SUIP) in the Far North District. The rate is set as follows:
Including GST
Far North District $8.79 per SUIP
k. Targeted Awanui River management rate
A targeted rate set under the LGRA, set differentially by location and area of benefit as defined in the Awanui River Flood Management Plan, and as defined in the following table:
The rate is set differentially as follows:
Category |
Description |
Rate including GST |
|
|
UA |
Urban rate class UA (floodplain location) $285.53 direct benefit plus $28.19 indirect benefit per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit (SUIP). |
$313.72 per SUIP |
|
|
UA |
Urban rate class UA – commercial differential. |
$941.16 per SUIP |
|
|
UF |
Urban rate classes UF (higher ground) $28.19 direct benefit plus $28.19 indirect benefit per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit. |
$56.38 per SUIP
|
|
|
UF |
Urban rate class UF – commercial differential. |
$169.14 per SUIP |
|
|
Rural |
Rural rate differentiated by class, $11.75 per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit (SUIP) of indirect benefit plus a rate per hectare for each of the following classes of land in the defined Kaitāia flood rating district as illustrated in the following maps and table. |
$11.75 per SUIP |
|
|
Class |
Description |
Rate including GST |
|
|
A & B |
High benefit: rural land which receives high benefit from the Awanui scheme works due to reduced river flooding risk and/or reduced duration of flooding and/or coastal flooding – all rateable land other that in the commercial differential. |
$23.33 per hectare |
|
|
A & B commercial differential |
$69.99 per hectare |
|||
C |
Moderate benefit: land floods less frequently and water clears quickly – all rateable land other that in the commercial differential. |
$10.90 per hectare |
|
|
C commercial differential |
$32.70 per hectare |
|||
F |
Contributes runoff waters and increases the need for flood protection - all rateable land other that in the commercial differential. |
$0.77 per hectare |
|
|
F commercial differential |
$2.31 per hectare |
|||
The rating classifications are illustrated in the following maps:
I. Targeted Kaihū River management rate
A targeted rate set under the LGRA, and set differentially by location and area of benefit as defined in the following table:
Class |
Description |
Rate Including GST |
|
A |
Land on the floodplain and side valleys downstream of Rotu Bottleneck. |
$23.13 per hectare |
|
B |
Land on the floodplain and tributary side valleys between Ahikiwi and the Rotu Bottleneck and in the Mangatara Drain catchment upstream of SH12. |
$11.39 per hectare |
|
F |
Land within the Kaihū River rating area not falling within Class A and Class B. |
$1.60 per hectare |
|
Urban Contribution – A contribution from the Kaipara District Council instead of a separate rate per property: |
$5,015 per annum |
The rating classifications are illustrated in the following map:
l. Targeted Kaeo-Whangaroa rivers management rate
A targeted rate set under the LGRA, set on a uniform basis in respect of each rateable separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit falling within the former Whangaroa Ward rating rolls of 100-199, as illustrated in the map below:
Including GST
Former Whangaroa Ward $54.52 per SUIP
m. Targeted Whangārei urban rivers management rate
A targeted rate set under the LGRA and assessed on all rateable properties defined by reference to the differential categories and differentiated by location (illustrated in the map below) and, for some categories, land use. It is set as a fixed amount per each rateable separately used or inhabited part (SUIP) of a rating unit, as follows:
Category |
|
Including GST |
1 |
Commercial properties located in the Whangārei Central Business District flood area:
|
$351.22 per SUIP |
2 |
Residential properties located in the Whangārei Central Business District flood area:
|
$172.08 per SUIP |
3 |
Properties located in the contributing water catchment area (including properties falling in the Waiarohia, Raumanga, Kirikiri and Hātea River Catchments): |
$42.13 per SUIP |
Differential categories for the Whangārei urban rivers management rate:
Residential properties in the Whangārei central business district |
Residential properties in the Whangārei central business district (CBD) flood area are defined as all rating units which are used principally for residential or lifestyle residential purposes, including retirement villages, flats etc. Residential properties also includes multi-unit properties, these being all separate rating units used principally for residential purposes, and on which is situated multi-unit type residential accommodation that is used principally for temporary or permanent residential accommodation and for financial reward, including, but not limited to, hotels, boarding houses, motels, tourist accommodation, residential clubs and hostels but excluding any properties that are licensed under the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012. |
Commercial properties in the Whangārei central business district |
Commercial properties in the Whangārei CBD flood area are all separate rating units used principally for commercial, industrial or related purposes or zoned for commercial, industrial or related purposes in accordance with the Whangārei district plan. For the avoidance of doubt, this category includes properties licensed under the Sale and Supply of Alcohol 2012; and private hospitals and private medical centres. |
n. Targeted Taumārere rivers management rate
A targeted rate set under the LGRA, set on a uniform basis in respect of each rateable separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit falling within the Tamārere, as illustrated in the map below:
Including GST
Taumārere $67.15 per SUIP
4. That the Northland Regional Council resolves the following with respect to payment dates for rates and the penalty regime::
Far North District constituency:
The Northland Regional Council resolves that all rates within the Far North District constituency are payable in four equal instalments, on the following dates:
Instalment |
Due date for payment |
Instalment 1 |
20 August 2022 |
Instalment 2 |
20 November 2022 |
Instalment 3 |
20 February 2023 |
Instalment 4 |
20 May 2023 |
The Northland Regional Council resolves to add the following penalties to unpaid Far North District constituency rates:
· In accordance with section 58(1)(a) of the LGRA, a penalty of ten percent (10%) will be added to any portion of each instalment of Far North District constituency rates assessed in the 2022/23 financial year that is unpaid on or by the respective due date for payment as stated above. These penalties will be added on the following dates:
Instalment |
Date penalty will be added |
Instalment 1 |
27 August 2022 |
Instalment 2 |
27 November 2022 |
Instalment 3 |
27 February 2023 |
Instalment 4 |
27 May 2023 |
Kaipara District constituency:
The Northland Regional Council resolves that all rates within the Kaipara District constituency are payable in four equal instalments, on the following dates:
Instalment |
Due date for payment |
Instalment 1 |
20 August 2022 |
Instalment 2 |
20 November 2022 |
Instalment 3 |
20 February 2023 |
Instalment 4 |
20 May 2023 |
The Northland Regional Council resolves to add the following penalties to unpaid Kaipara District constituency rates:
· In accordance with section 58(1) (a) of the LGRA, a penalty of ten percent (10%) of so much of each instalment of the Kaipara District constituency rates assessed in the 2022/23 financial year that are unpaid after the relevant due date for each instalment will be added on the relevant penalty date for each instalment stated below, except where a ratepayer has entered into an arrangement by way of direct debit authority, and honours that arrangement. These penalties will be added on the following dates:
Instalment |
Date penalty will be added |
Instalment 1 |
21 August 2022 |
Instalment 2 |
21 November 2022 |
Instalment 3 |
21 February 2023 |
Instalment 4 |
21 May 2023 |
· In accordance with section 58(1)(b) of the LGRA, a penalty of ten per cent (10%) of the amount of all Kaipara District constituency rates (including any penalties) from any previous financial years that are unpaid on 5 July 2022 will be added on 7 July 2022.
· In accordance with section 58(1)(c) of the LGRA, a penalty of ten per cent (10%) of the amount of all Kaipara District constituency rates to which a penalty has been added under the point immediately above and which remain unpaid on 10 January 2023 will be added on 11 January 2023.
Whangārei District constituency:
The Northland Regional Council resolves that all rates within the Whangārei District constituency are payable in four equal instalments, on the following dates:
Instalment |
Due date for payment |
Instalment 1 |
20 August 2022 |
Instalment 2 |
20 November 2022 |
Instalment 3 |
20 February 2023 |
Instalment 4 |
20 May 2023 |
The Northland Regional Council resolves to add the following penalties to unpaid Whangārei District constituency rates:
· In accordance with section 58(1)(a) of the LGA, a penalty of ten percent (10%) will be added to any portion of each instalment of Whangārei District constituency rates assessed in the 2022/23 financial year that is unpaid on or by the respective due date for payment as stated above. These penalties will be added on the following dates:
Instalment |
Date penalty will be added |
Instalment 1 |
24 August 2022 |
Instalment 2 |
23 November 2022 |
Instalment 3 |
23 February 2023 |
Instalment 4 |
24 May 2023 |
· In accordance with section 58(1)(b) of the LGRA, a penalty of ten per cent (10%) will be added to any Whangārei District constituency rates (including any penalties) from any financial year prior to 1 July 2022 that still remain unpaid as at 5 July 2022. This penalty will be added on 7 September 2022.
The district councils have advised that their rates adoption dates are as follows:
· Far North District Council – 30 June 2022
· Kaipara District Council – 28 June 2022
· Whangarei District Council – 30 June 2022.
Should their collection and/or penalty dates change through the rate setting process we will need to amend our resolution accordingly.
Background/Tuhinga
The Northland Regional Council is scheduled to adopt its 2022-2023 Annual Plan at the council meeting to be held on 28 June 2022. Following the adoption of the Revenue and Financing Policy and the 2022-2023 Annual Plan, all formal requirements to resolve the rates for the year ended 30 June 2023 are in place and permit the following resolution to proceed.
The final rates have been calculated in accordance with the resolutions made by council on 24 May 2022; and the updated rating units, separately used or inhabited parts of a rating unit (SUIPs), capital values and land values provided by the district councils.
Under section 23 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 (LGRA) the council is required to set its rates by resolution. This paper provides for the council to set rates for the year commencing on 1 July 2022 and ending on 30 June 2023.
Rates for the 2022/23 year are set out on a GST inclusive basis. This means that the amount of the rates stated includes the council’s GST obligations. Penalties are added to the amount of unpaid rates.
Section 24 of the LGRA requires that the council state the due date for payment of the rates in its resolution setting rates.
Under section 55 of the LGRA, the council may provide for a discount on the rates if payment is made by a specified date before the due date or dates, in accordance with a policy made under section 55. Currently no council in Northland applies this policy.
Section 57 of the LGRA states that a local authority may, by resolution, authorise penalties to be added to rates that are not paid by the due date. The resolution must state how the penalty is calculated and the date the penalty is to be added to the number of unpaid rates. Section 58 of the LGRA sets out the penalties that may be imposed.
Pursuant to section 23(5) of the LGRA, within 20 working days after making a resolution, make the resolution publicly available on an Internet site maintained by it or on its behalf to which the public has free access.
Pursuant to section 28(4) of the LGRA the rating information database was made available for public inspection during May/June.
The full details of the rates calculations and rates collected from each constituent district of the Northland region will be as set out in the tables below:
Table One: Valuations by district (including equalised values)
SUIP = Separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit.
Table Two: Northland Regional Council rates for the 2022/23 financial year
Budgeted Rates 2022/23 (including GST) |
Far North District |
Kaipara District |
Whangārei District |
Total $ |
Total $ |
Targeted council services rate |
|||||
Rate per SUIP |
$140.02
|
|
|
$5,226,527 |
$5,089,867 |
Rate per RU |
|
$169.14
|
|
$2,475,195 |
$2,456,589 |
Rate per SUIP |
|
|
$158.26 |
$7,346,587 |
$7,133,253 |
|
|
|
|
$15,048,309 |
$14,679,709
|
Targeted land and freshwater management rate |
|||||
Rate per $ of Actual LV |
$0.0003835 |
|
|
$3,909,644 |
$3,878,687 |
Rate per $ of Actual LV |
|
$0.0003565 |
|
$2,153,227 |
$2,142,590 |
Rate per $ of Actual LV |
|
|
$0.0002780 |
$5,671,283 |
$5,621,215 |
|
|
|
|
$11,734,154 |
$11,642,492 |
Targeted pest management rate |
|||||
Rate per SUIP |
$71.77 |
|
|
$2,678,959 |
$2,608,911 |
Rate per RU |
|
$86.69 |
|
$1,268,621 |
$1,259,086 |
Rate per SUIP |
|
|
$80.23 |
$3,724,357 |
$3,616,207 |
|
|
|
|
$7,671,937 |
$7,484,204 |
Targeted flood infrastructure rate |
|||||
Rate per SUIP |
$33.24 |
|
|
$1,240,749 |
$1,208,307 |
Rate per RU |
|
$33.24 |
|
$486,434 |
$482,778 |
Rate per SUIP |
|
|
$33.24 |
$1,543,034 |
$1,498,227 |
|
|
|
|
$3,270,217 |
$3,189,312 |
Targeted emergency and hazard management rate |
|||||
Rate per SUIP |
$40.15 |
|
|
$1,498,679 |
$1,459,493 |
Rate per RU |
|
$48.50 |
|
$709,749 |
$704,414 |
Rate per SUIP |
|
|
$44.88 |
$2,083,374 |
$2,022,876 |
|
|
|
|
$4,291,802 |
$4,186,783 |
Targeted regional sporting facilities rate |
|||||
Rate per SUIP |
$16.60 |
|
|
$619,628 |
$603,427 |
Rate per RU |
|
$16.60 |
|
$242,924 |
$241,098 |
Rate per SUIP |
|
|
$16.60 |
$770,589 |
$748,212 |
|
|
|
|
$1,633,141 |
$1,592,737 |
Targeted regional economic development rate |
|||||
Rate per $ of Actual LV |
$0.0000260 |
|
|
$265,061 |
$262,965 |
Rate per $ of Actual LV |
|
$0.0000242 |
|
$146,166 |
$145,446 |
Rate per $ of Actual LV |
|
|
$0.0000188 |
$383,526 |
$380,129 |
|
|
|
|
$794,752 |
$788,540 |
Targeted emergency services rate |
|||||
Rate per SUIP |
$11.60 |
|
|
$432,993 |
$421,672 |
Rate per RU |
|
$11.60 |
|
$169,754 |
$168,478 |
Rate per SUIP |
|
|
$11.60 |
$538,484 |
$522,847 |
|
|
|
|
$1,141,231 |
$1,112,997 |
Targeted Whangārei transport rate |
|||||
Rate per SUIP |
|
|
$38.47 |
$1,785,816 |
$1,733,958 |
Targeted Far North transport rate |
|||||
Far North District |
$8.79 |
|
|
$328,104 |
$319,525 |
Targeted Awanui River management rate |
|||||
Far North District - Rural |
|
|
|
$190,286 |
$190,041 |
Far North District - Urban |
|
|
|
$850,144 |
$838,734 |
|
|
|
|
$1,040,430 |
$1,028,775 |
Targeted Kaihū River management rate |
|||||
Kaipara District (Kaihū river area only) |
|
|
|
$79,869 |
$79,869 |
Targeted Kaeo-Whangaroa rivers management rate |
|||||
Far North (Kaeo only) |
$54.52 |
|
|
$121,860 |
$118,043 |
Targeted Taumārere rivers management rate |
|||||
Far North (Otira-Moerewa/Kawakawa only) |
$67.15 |
|
|
$116,102 |
$113,278 |
Targeted Whangārei urban rivers management rate |
|||||
Rates per SUIP |
|
|
|
$1,163,385 |
$1,142,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rates |
|
|
|
Gross $ |
Net $ |
Far North District |
|
|
|
$17,478,737 |
$17,112,950 |
Kaipara District |
|
|
|
$7,731,941 |
$7,680,348 |
Whangārei District |
|
|
|
$25,010,434 |
$24,419,504 |
TOTAL RATES |
|
|
|
$50,221,110 |
$49,212,802 |
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Adopt the recommendations presented in this report |
Legally generate the rating revenue required to fund the council’s 2022/23 work programmes. |
None
|
2 |
Do not adopt the recommendations presented in this report |
None |
Inability to legally strike the 2022/23 rates. Consequently, unless alternative funding streams were obtained, the council would fail to deliver all its 2022/23 work programmes. |
The staff’s recommended option is to adopt the recommendations presented in this report.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
The work programmes that comprise the Annual Plan 2022-2023, funded by rates to the degree discussed in this paper, significantly increase council’s ability to respond to environmental issues and opportunities.
The risks and impacts of these proposals have been considered by council by way of a series of workshops, and in council’s deliberations on the proposals by way of extraordinary council meeting on 24 May 2022.
2. Community views
The impact of the 2022-2023 Annual Plan budgets on council’s rates has been consulted on with the community through the 2022-2023 Annual Plan consultative procedure in accordance with s82 of the Local Government Act 2002.
3. Māori impact statement
Consultation on the council’s rates funding requirement was undertaken with māori as part of the 2022/2023 Annual Plan consultation process using existing relationship channels.
4. Financial implications
This report discusses setting of rates for the 2022/23 financial year. The financial impacts of the recommendations in this report are significant as it determines council’s ability to collect rate revenue.
5. Implementation issues
No implementation issues are anticipated in setting rates for the 2022/23 financial year.
6. Significance and engagement
The council’s 2022-2023 Annual Plan has been developed in accordance with sections 93 and 93A-93G of the Local Government Act 2002, and contains details of the proposed rates.
The rates being set have been established as part of the 2022-2023 Annual Plan process that included consultation with the public who have had the opportunity to fully consider the issues and present their views to the council, which have in turn been taken into consideration.
Consequently, this resolution is required to enact previous decisions of council through the annual plan process and is an administrative decision that does not itself trigger the Significance and Engagement Policy.
The decisions in this report are in accordance with sections 76 to 82 of the Local Government Act 2002 and the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002.
The public will have access to the final 2022-2023 Annual Plan and rates resolution through the council’s website.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
This report has been independently reviewed by Lizzy Wiessing - Barrister, and meets all the statutory requirements under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 for the setting of 2022/23 rates.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 7.2
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Adoption of Annual Plan 2022/23 |
From: |
Nicola Hartwell, Corporate Planner |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 15 June 2022 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
This report presents council’s Annual Plan for 2022/23.
The Annual Plan 2022/23 underwent a period of public consultation, with deliberations on the proposals taking place on 24 May 2022.
1. That the report ‘Adoption of Annual Plan 2022/23’ by Nicola Hartwell, Corporate Planner dated 26 May 2022, be received.
2. That council sets and adopts the Annual Plan 2022/23 included as Attachment 1 pertaining to this item of the 28 June 2022 council agenda.
3. That council authorises Bruce Howse, Group Manager – Corporate Services to make any necessary minor drafting, typographical, rounding, or presentation corrections to the Annual Plan 2022/23 prior to final publication of the document.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Set and adopt the Annual Plan 2022/23 |
The relevant activities can be funded and delivered as planned, and rates set in a timely manner for the 2022/23 financial year |
None |
2 |
Do not set and adopt the Annual Plan 2022/23 |
None |
Council will be in breach of its statutory obligations and the relevant council activities will not receive funding to allow delivery of the service |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1, to set and adopt the Annual Plan 2022/23.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
The initiatives presented as part of the Annual Plan 2022/23 enable more efficient delivery of services, and reduced vehicle emissions, with otherwise minimal environmental impact.
2. Community views
The views of the community on the Annual Plan 2022/23 were obtained during a period of consultation in accordance with sections 82 and 83 of the LGA. Community views have been provided to council by way of links to full submissions and a summary of submissions report.
Council has considered the proposals included in the Annual Plan 2022/23 by way of a deliberations meeting held on 24 May 2022 that centred upon the public feedback received.
3. Māori impact statement
While there were no proposals in the Annual Plan 2022/23 that were considered to have significant and specific impacts on Māori over and above those of the general public, the process of consultation included engagement with Māori. This occurred by way of a letter circulated via electronic direct mail to all iwi and hapū groups on council’s database.
4. Financial implications
Financial implications are addressed in the Annual Plan 2022/23 and the Annual Plan Supporting Information document.
5. Implementation issues
Nil
6. Significance and engagement
Section 76AA of the LGA directs that council must adopt a policy setting out how significance will be determined, and the level of engagement that will be triggered. This policy assists council in determining how to achieve compliance with the LGA requirements in relation to decisions.
The proposals set out in the Annual Plan 2022/23 triggered council’s significance and engagement policy, and the process of consultation and engagement has now been carried out. The results of this engagement were summarised and provided to council to inform council’s deliberations on 24 May 2022 and its decision-making process.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
Section 95 of the LGA provides that council must adopt an annual plan before the end of each financial year. If the Annual Plan 2022/23 is not adopted by council before 30 June 2022, council will be in breach of s 95(1) of the LGA.
Background/Tuhinga
The Annual Plan 2022/23 identifies funding variations for council activities planned in its Long Term Plan 2021-31, highlighting the impact on council’s budget and regional rates. The Annual Plan 2022/23 adds an extra $1.7 million in capital expenditure to replace council’s maritime vessel, to be funded by lending from the Local Government Funding Agency and repaid from the council services rate over 15 years. The plan also adds $188,216 of additional operational expenditure to increase and improve the Whangārei CityLink public transport service.
The proposed changes increase the total region-wide rate take in 2022/23 from the 13.79% approved in the LTP 2021-31, to 13.89% (0.1% difference).
The Whangārei Transport rate increases by an extra $4.80 (approximately) per Whangārei ratepayer, for a year-on-year average increase of just over approximately $65 for Whangārei ratepayers.
There will be an increase in the region-wide rate of approximately $0.80 per ratepayer beginning in 2023/24, as a result of capital expenditure funding outlining in this annual plan.
Council consulted on the proposed changes pursuant to ss 82 and 83 of the LGA during a month long period running from 26 March to 29 April 2022. Council deliberated on the proposed changes and public feedback received on 24 May 2022.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Annual Plan 2022 for adoption ⇩
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Adoption of User Fees and Charges 2022/23 | Kaupapa Here a Utu |
From: |
Robyn Broadhurst, Policy Specialist |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 22 June 2022 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
This report presents council’s user fees and charges, and associated policy, contained within the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 schedule for setting and adoption by council.
This schedule underwent a period of public consultation concurrently with the Annual Plan 2022/23.
1. That the report ‘Adoption of User Fees and Charges 2022/23 | Kaupapa Here a Utu’ by Policy Specialist and dated 11 May 2022, be received.
2. That council sets and adopts the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 included as Attachment 1 pertaining to this item of the 28 June 2022 council agenda.
3. That council authorises Group Manager – Corporate Excellence to make any necessary minor drafting, typographical, rounding, or presentation corrections to the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 prior to final publication of the document.
Options
Section 150 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) sets out the process by which a local authority may prescribe fees and charges in respect of any matter provided for, either under a bylaw or under any other enactment if the enactment does not authorise the local authority to charge a fee. Section 36 of the Resource Management Act 1991 authorises local authorities to fix charges and specifies that such charges must be fixed in the manner set out by section 150 of the LGA.
Council has completed a review of fees and charges and followed the relevant process for consultation required under sections 82 and 83 of the LGA.
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Set and adopt the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 |
Policy, fees and charges can be updated for the 2022/23 financial year |
None |
2 |
Do not set and adopt the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 |
None |
Fees and charges will not be updated for the 2022/23 financial year, resulting in inaccurate costs, and the inability of council to recover the costs of activities |
The staff’s recommended option is option 1, to set and adopt the User Fees and Charges 2022/2023.
Considerations
1. Community views
The views of the community on the changes to the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 were obtained during a period of consultation in accordance with sections 82 and 83 of the LGA. Community views have been provided to council by way of links to full submissions and a summary of submissions report.
Council has considered the proposals included in the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 by way of a deliberations meeting held on 24 May 2022 that centred upon the public feedback received.
2. Māori impact statement
While there were no proposals in the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 that were considered to have significant and specific impacts on Māori over and above those of the general public, the process of consultation included engagement with Māori. This occurred by way of a letter circulated via electronic direct mail to all iwi and hapū groups on council’s database.
3. Financial implications
The User Fees and Charges 2022/23 sets out the fees and charges for the 2022/23 financial year, which make up a portion of council’s income sources. An estimation of the income received from these fees and charges, that contributes to budgeted income for the 2022/23 financial year, is reflected in the financial statements set out in council’s Annual Plan 2022/23.
4. Significance and engagement
Section 76AA of the LGA directs that council must adopt a policy setting out how significance will be determined and the level of engagement that will be triggered. This policy assists council in determining how to achieve compliance with the LGA requirements in relation to decisions.
Consultation on the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 has been completed, achieving compliance with council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
5. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The decision to confirm and adopt the User Fees and Charges 2022/23 is in accordance with section 150 of the LGA and is consistent with the policy and legislative requirements of the various pieces of legislation that council sets charges under. These are detailed in sections 2.1 – 2.6 of the User Fees and Charges 2022/23, and in addition to the LGA include the Resource Management Act, Northland Regional Council Navigation Safety Bylaw, Maritime Transport Act, the Biosecurity Act, and the Building Act.
Background/Tuhinga
The User Fees and Charges 2022/23 schedule contains the fees and charges that council is authorised to set under the various pieces of legislation that it works under. These are reviewed annually and have been done so, and consulted on, in conjunction with the process of developing the Annual Plan 2022/23.
All applicable fees and charges in the schedule have been adjusted for inflation with a rate of 2.4% applied as set by BERL.
In addition to the inflationary increase, the Pilotage and Shipping Navigation and Safety Services Fees have also been increased. Further minor amendments were made for clarity, including the removal of a note under tables 3.6.2 and 3.6.4 relating to the number of offices attending a site visit, which was the result of feedback received during consultation and subsequent council deliberation.
Vehicle rates (section 3.9.5) have also been updated in line with that set by IRD.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: User Fees and Charges 2022/23 ⇩
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Biosecurity Operational Plan 2022-2023 |
From: |
Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity, on 14 June 2022 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
The attached Operational Plan has been prepared as a requirement of the Biosecurity Act 1993 section 100B and should be read in conjunction with the Northland Regional Pest and Marine Pathway Management Plan 2017–2027 (hereafter referred to as the Pest Plan). It includes all species listed in the Pest Plan and describes how biosecurity programmes will be implemented during the 2022-2023 financial year.
1. That the report ‘Biosecurity Operational Plan 2022-2023’ by Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity and dated 14 June 2022, be received.
2. That council approve the Biosecurity Operational Plan 2022-2023 in accordance with the Biosecurity Act section 100b.
3. That council authorises the GM Biosecurity to make any necessary minor drafting, typographical, rounding, or presentation corrections to the Biosecurity Operational Plan 2022-2023.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Council approves the whole Operational Plan |
Implementation of the rules and activities can proceed under the revised plan. |
Nil |
2 |
Council may request amendments on the grounds that the Operational Plan is inconsistent with the Pest Plan |
Improved consistency with the Pest Plan is achieved. |
The process for their confirmation by council will cause delays in implementation. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option1.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
This decision will have no foreseeable impact on the ability of council to respond to the impacts of climate change within the following year.
2. Community views
Community views have been sought through the development of the Pest Plan and respective Long-Term Plans and Annual Plans. Based on community feedback the Pest Plan and annual budgets have been set which this Biosecurity Operational Plan now implements.
3. Māori impact statement
Similarly, Māori feedback and input has been sought through the development of the Pest Plan and respective Long-Term Plans and Annual Plans. Based on this feedback the Pest Plan and annual budgets have been set which this Biosecurity Operational Plan now implements. In addition, tāngata whenua members of the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council sit on the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party and have had an opportunity to provide feedback and input into this Operational Plan.
4. Financial implications
Budget for implementation is allocated as part of the current Long-Term Plan and Annual Plan. Regular review of the Operational Plan will be undertaken as additional and any external funding allocations are confirmed.
5. Implementation issues
There are no known barriers to implementation of the current plan at this stage.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to Section 100B this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against the council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because the pest plan has previously been consulted on. This decision concerns its implementation and is provided for in council’s Long-Term Plan and is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tāngata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The Operational Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Biosecurity Act 1993, section 100B and is consistent with the Pest Plan.
Background/Tuhinga
The Northland Operational Plan aims to be a concise and accurate reflection of the content of the Pest Plan. Reviews of the Operational Plan can be undertaken during the year, and staff believe this will be important as additional government funding for activities such as the national plan for kauri protection and PF2050 become clearer.
Section 100B of the Biosecurity Act states that the Operational Plan will be completed within three months of the end of the financial year and is now presented for council approval having been considered and endorsed by the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party in May.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Biosecurity Operational Plan 2022-2023 ⇩
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Submissions on freshwater and indigenous biodiversity national instruments |
From: |
Ben Lee, Planning and Policy Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services, on 15 June 2022 |
Executive Summary | Whakarāpopototanga
Government has released an exposure draft of prosed changes to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (2020) and the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (2020). It is recommended that council make a submission, and the content be approved by a small group of councillors and signed by the chair.
Government has also released on the Draft National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity – Exposure draft. It was only released on 9 June 2022 and at the time of writing staff had not had time to consider it. Staff will provide a verbal update at the council meeting as to whether council should make a submission. If council decides to make a submission, it is recommended the content be approved by a small group of councillors and signed by the chair.
1. That the report ‘Submissions on freshwater and indigenous biodiversity national instruments’ by Ben Lee, Planning and Policy Manager and dated 7 June 2022, be received.
2. That council make a submission on the exposure draft of proposed changes to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (2020) and the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (2020).
3. That councillors_________ be delegated authority to approve the content of a submission on behalf of council on the exposure draft of proposed changes to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (2020) and the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (2020), and the submission to be signed by the Chair.
4. That council (make / don’t make) a submission on the Draft National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity – Exposure draft.
5. That councillors ______ be delegated authority to approve the content of a submission on behalf of council on the Draft National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity – Exposure draft, and the submission to be signed by the Chair.
6. That a draft of any submission made under resolution 3. or 5. will be circulated to non-elected members of the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party for comment prior to being lodged.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Council makes submissions (either its own and/or a regional council sector submission) |
The government is aware of council concerns with the proposals and council’s submission informs government decisions. |
Staff time to prepare submissions |
2 |
Council does not make submissions |
No staff time taken up with preparing submissions |
The government is not aware of councils concerns and therefore no chance of influencing government decisions. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
The decision will not have a direct impact on the environment. There may be some indirect impact on Northland’s environment, but it will depend on the contact of the submission
2. Community views
The government proposals are likely to be of interest to communities. However, the decision to make council submissions does not require public / community consultation.
3. Māori impact statement
The government proposals are likely to be of interest to Māori. It is recommended a draft of any submission will be circulated to non-elected members of the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party for comment prior to being lodged.
4. Financial implications
There are no financial implications associated with this decision.
5. Implementation issues
There are no implementation issues associated with this decision
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement. (Note recommendation that the views of the non-elected members of the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party on draft submission(s) be sought for comment prior to being lodged)
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
There are no known legislative compliance or risks associated with this decision.
Background | Tuhinga
Exposure draft of proposed changes to the NPS-FM and NES-F (including wetland regulations)
The Ministry for the Environment (MfE) consulted on proposed amendments to wetland provisions in the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPS-FM) and the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (NES-F) from 1 September to 27 October 2021. Council made a submission.
Following consultation, MfE analysed submissions and prepared a report summarising submissions and providing advice and recommendations to the Minister. Decisions made based on that report enabled drafting of proposed amendments to wetland provisions.
Given the number and complexity of the proposed amendments to the wetland provisions, MfE have provided further context and policy rationale for those amendments.
Read Managing our wetlands: Policy rationale for exposure draft amendments 2022
Additionally, since the NPS-FM and NES-F were gazetted in August 2020, MfE officials have maintained a record of technical issues and provisions that require clarification. These amendments aim to improve clarity, reduce complexity of drafting, and in some cases correct errors, without fundamentally changing policy.
Read the Overview of technical corrections and clarifications in the NPS-FM exposure draft
MfE have proposed drafting for these amendments and is seeking feedback on whether the drafting is clear, and if there are any unintended consequences arising from the drafting. Feedback opened 31 May 2020 and closes 10 July 2022.
Staff recommend council make a submission. At the time of writing staff had yet to prepare draft submission, and therefore recommend delegating the lodging of a council submission to a small number of councillors (staff have no view as to which councillors – but just that it be a small number for administrative ease). It is anticipated this can be achieved via email with these councillors.
Councillors should also be aware that the regional council sector is also making a submission. Council’s submission therefore may not cover the entire range of issues as they may be adequality addressed in the sector submission, and rather focus on issues particularly relevant to Northland (for example the way the NES-F deals with coastal wetlands) and reiterate the points made in council’s previous submission.
Exposure draft of the National Policy Statement - Indigenous Biodiversity
Government released the Draft National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity — Exposure draft (draft NPS – IB) on 9 June. It is open for submissions until 21 July 2022. Staff had not determined whether council should make a submission at the time of writing. Staff will provide a verbal recommendation at the council meeting.
There will be a sector led submission that staff will input into.
The draft NPS-IB has objectives, policies, and implementation requirements to help protect precious flora and fauna.
More information about the draft NPSIB can be found here.
Public consultation on the previous iteration of the draft NPS-IB took place between November 2019 and January 2020. Council made a submission which supported the intent but raised major concerns over the complexity, cost implications (for councils, landowners and consent applicants) and implementation generally.
The draft NPS-IB takes into account submissions received during the November 2019 to January 2020 public consultation period.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 7.6
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Te Mana o Te Wai Funding |
From: |
Ben Lee, Planning and Policy Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services, on 15 June 2022 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
Council has allocated $250,000 per year ongoing, starting from next financial year (1 July 2022), for implementing Te Mana o Te Wai (as directed by the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management). The recommendations within this report reflect the advice of Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) on how this funding should be spent.
1. That the report ‘Te Mana o Te Wai Funding’ by Ben Lee, Planning and Policy Manager and dated 24 May 2022, be received.
2. That the allocation of the $250,000 Te Mana o Te Wai funding for 2023/2024, 2023/2024 and 2024/2025 is based on the following priorities:
a. 1st priority: Supporting tangata whenua participation in the freshwater planning process.
b. 2nd priority: Developing a mātauranga Māori freshwater framework.
c. 3rd priority:
i. Implementing the mātauranga Māori freshwater framework, and
ii. Investigating the use of mechanisms available under the Resource Management Act 1991 to involve tangata whenua in freshwater management (such as using transfer of functions and joint management agreements)
3. That the allocation of the $250,000 Te Mana o Te Wai funding for 2022/2023 is as follows:
Activity |
22/23 |
A) Supporting tangata whenua in the freshwater planning process |
$150k |
B) Developing a Freshwater Mātauranga Māori framework |
$100K |
C) Implementing the Mātauranga Māori freshwater framework |
$0 |
D) Investigating the use of mechanisms available under the Resource Management Act 1991 to involve tangata whenua in freshwater management (such as using transfer of functions and joint management agreements) |
$0 |
4. That Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party advice is sought early 2023 on the allocation of the 2023/2024 Te Mana o Te Wai funding.
5. That Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party advice is sought on a scope of work for developing a mātauranga Māori freshwater framework.
6. That council will approve a scope of work for developing a mātauranga Māori freshwater framework upon receiving advice from Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Confirm the priorities for the $250,000 Te Mana o Te Wai funding for the next three years. |
Provides clear direction to plan for the expenditure of the fund. Consistent with TTMAC advice. |
None |
2 |
Do not confirm the priorities. |
None |
No direction for staff to plan for expenditure of the fund. Goes against TTMAC advice. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
The decision (to identify the priorities for spending) will not have a direct impact on the environment. However, the priorities recommended will support activities benefiting the environment over time.
2. Community views
No views, other than TTMAC, have been sought on how the Te Mana o Te Wai funding should be spent.
3. Māori impact statement
The recommendations are consistent with the advice of TTMAC. No other Māori views have been sought and nor are they considered necessary. The views of TTMAC are considered to provide an appropriate level of understanding of Māori views given the nature of the decision.
4. Financial implications
There are no financial implications. The decision is about how to spend budgeted funds.
5. Implementation issues
There are no implementation issues in respect to a decision to support tangata whenua participation in the freshwater planning process (1st priority). It will help address an issue of potentially underfunding the tangata whenua involvement aspects of the freshwater planning process.
The development of a mātauranga Māori freshwater framework (2nd priority) will be led by the Environmental Services group. Any issues with implementation of the mātauranga Māori freshwater framework (3rd priority) will be considered during its development and when council approves it. The same applies to investigating the use of mechanisms available under the Resource Management Act 1991 to involve tangata whenua in freshwater management (3rd priority).
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, the recommendations are of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is about the allocation of a budget already set in council’s Long-Term Plan and the recommendations reflect the advice of TTMAC. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
The establishment of the $250,000 Te Mana o te Wai fund was as a result of the policy direction in the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management. There is no relevant policy or legislative direction for the specific allocation of the funding.
Background/Tuhinga
In 2020 central government released its National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020 (NPS-FM).
It requires freshwater to be managed in a way that gives effect to Te Mana of te Wai[1], including by
· involving tangata whenua,
· prioritising the health and wellbeing of water bodies, then the essential needs of people, followed by other uses,
· enabling the application of mātauranga Māori, to the management of freshwater, and
· investigating use of transfer of powers, joint management agreements and mana whakahono a rohe.
Council has allocated $250,000 a year ongoing starting in the next financial year (starting 1 July 2022) as part of its commitment to implement Te Mana o Te Wai. The funding is to support tangata whenua in freshwater management. No decisions have been made about how the funding will be allocated, except for advancing $111,000 from next year’s budget to assist the Tangata Whenua Water Advisory Group (TWWAG) in their work on the freshwater plan change[2] this current financial year.
Council sought advice from TTMAC on how the Te Mana o Te Wai funding should be allocated (19 May 2022 TTMAC meeting). The advice was that for the first three years the priorities are:
o 1st priority – Supporting tangata whenua participation in the freshwater planning process (principally providing funding for TWWAG’s work and supporting tangata whenua participation in the planning process)
o 2nd priority – Developing a mātauranga Māori freshwater framework, which could include:
§ How mātauranga Māori is used for monitoring progress towards freshwater target attributes states and environmental outcomes in the freshwater plan change
§ Supporting kaitiaki to undertake their own freshwater monitoring mahi
§ Involving tangata whenua in the development of council freshwater monitoring programmes (e.g. wetlands, threatened species, and sediment)
§ Supporting kaitiaki to undertake activities to improve te mnan o te wai
o 3rd priority:
§ Implementing the mātauranga Māori freshwater framework – allocation of funds to tangata whenua to undertake freshwater mātauranga Māori activities
§ Investigating the transfer of functions, joint management agreements etc.
Based on these priorities, the proposed general estimated allocation would be as follows:
22/23 |
23/24 |
24/25 |
|
1. Supporting tangata whenua in the freshwater planning process* |
$150k ($111k already allocated + additional estimated $39k) |
$50k |
$50k |
2. Developing a Freshwater Mātauranga Māori framework |
$100K |
$0 |
$0 |
3.a. Implementing the Mātauranga Māori freshwater framework |
$0 |
$150k |
$150k |
3.b. Investigate transfer of functions, JMAs etc |
$0 |
$50k |
$50k |
*There is already budget for Māori involvement in freshwater water planning i.e. not all being funded out of TMOTW funding.
If council is comfortable with this approach, then the proposed next steps are:
· Firm up the funding for the first year (22/23) for supporting tangata whenua in the freshwater planning process (the first priority). This will depend on TWWAG’s 22/23 workplan and the programme for tangata whenua engagement on the plan change (estimate August/September).
· Prepare a scope of work for developing the mātauranga Māori freshwater framework. TTMAC recommended they provide advice to council on the scope of work. Council would then confirm the scope of work.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 7.7
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Tangata Whenua Environmental Monitoring Fund - draft allocation policy |
From: |
Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Auriole Ruka, Pou Manawhakahaere - GM Governance and Engagement and Jonathan Gibbard, Pou Tiaki Taiao – Group Manager Environmental Services, on 22 June 2022 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
Council has a fund of $20,000 a year to support environmental monitoring by tāngata whenua. The fund is intended to support tāngata whenua to undertake their own monitoring, however it is often underutilised and there is limited guidance for staff on how this fund should be allocated. A policy to guide allocation of the fund would clarify this situation for staff and tāngata whenua and help ensure the fund is fully allocated.
A draft policy has been developed with advice from the Māori Technical Advisory Group (MTAG) and was endorsed by Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) at the 19 May working party meeting. It is recommended that the draft policy attached be adopted by council.
1. That the report ‘Tangata Whenua Environmental Monitoring Fund - draft allocation policy’ by Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and dated 7 June 2022, be received.
2. That council adopt the Tāngata Whenua Environmental Monitoring Fund draft allocation policy.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
That council adopt the draft allocation policy. |
There is greater clarity on the purpose of the fund (for staff and applicants) and guidance on allocation of the fund. |
None |
2 |
Council does not adopt the draft allocation policy |
None |
A lack of clarity on the purpose of the fund remains and little guidance for those making allocation decisions |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
The adoption of the policy will have no negative impact on the ability of council to respond to climate change or environmental issues. The policy will better enable tāngata whenua to provide information that will support environmental management by both tāngata whenua and council.
2. Community views
3. Māori impact statement
Impacts on Māori are likely to be positive due to a clearer policy basis for allocating the monitoring fund. The policy has also been developed with input from MTAG and was endorsed by TTMAC at the 19 May meeting.
4. Financial implications
There are no known financial implications of adopting the draft allocation policy given the fund is already established.
5. Implementation issues
No implementation issues are expected given the tāngata whenua monitoring fund is already in place and the allocation policy will assist decision makers ensure the fund is targeted appropriately and fully allocated.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, the recommendations are of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is about the allocation of a budget already set in council’s Long-Term Plan. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tāngata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
There are no known risk or legislative compliance issues associated with adoption of the policy.
Background/Tuhinga
Council has a fund of $20,000 a year to support environmental monitoring by tāngata whenua. The fund is intended to support tāngata whenua to undertake their own monitoring, however it is often underutilised and there is limited guidance for staff on how this fund should be allocated. A policy to guide allocation of the fund would clarify this situation for staff and tāngata whenua alike.
Staff have worked with MTAG to develop a policy to guide allocation decisions for this fund. The policy will provide clarity as to the scope and purpose of the fund and provide consistency in decision making. The draft allocation policy was endorsed by TTMAC at the 19 May 2022 meeting with a minor amendment to include reference to ‘operational tāngata whenua entity’ in the application criteria. It is recommended that the draft allocation policy attached is adopted by council.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Tāngata whenua Environmental Monitoring Fund – Allocation Policy ⇩
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Formal endorsement of submission made into the National Adaptation Plan by the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee |
From: |
Tom FitzGerald, Climate Change Manager |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Victoria Harwood, Pou Tiaki Hapori - GM Community Resilience, on 13 June 2022 |
Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga
This report provides the final submission into the draft National Adaptation Plan from the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee (the JCCAC). The Submission was drafted by staff from across the four (4) councils and was subject to a short but intensive review and feedback period with elected members and Tiriti partners.
Submissions closed with the Ministry for the Environment (MfE) on 3 June 2022.
There are no existing delegations to the JCCAC with respect to joint submissions.
As per council’s Delegation’s Manual (2019), the Executive Leadership Team has delegated authority to make submissions on council’s behalf where timeframes are such that formal council approval cannot be sought prior to their lodgement. This is the case for submissions deemed to be politically significant.
The final submission was signed by council’s CEO on behalf of the JCCAC and submitted. It is attached for noting and endorsement.
1. That the report ‘Formal endorsement of submission made into the National Adaptation Plan by the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee’ by Climate Change Manager and dated 10 June 2022, be received.
2. That the attached final Submission be formally received and retrospectively approved.
Options
No. |
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
1 |
Submission approved |
A collaborative regional submission representing the views of the four (4) northern councils is a significant achievement. Retrospectively approving the submission confirms the strength and integrity of the regional partnership to address the climate crisis. It also positions Te Taitokerau as a leader in collaborative climate governance and serves to shine a light on the unique challenges we face. |
None. |
2 |
Submission not approved |
None. |
The submission has already been received by the Ministry for the Environment. If council were to not approve, the submission would have to be requested to be formally withdrawn. As our partner councils and Tiriti partners did not lodge their own submissions, they are relying on council approval to ensure their voices are heard. Not approving would have significant ramifications on the strength and integrity of our partnership and weaken the implementation of climate response actions. |
The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.
Considerations
1. Environmental Impact
This decision to approve this submission will have no direct impact on the environment.
However, a joint submission from Te Taitokerau councils provides greater opportunity to influence the direction and final content of New Zealand’s first ever National Adaptation Plan, thereby allowing improved likelihood of good adaptation outcomes in our region and for our communities.
2. Community views
The call for public submissions into the National Adaptation Plan was open from late April to 3 June 2022. Every New Zealander and every organisation had a chance to provide their own submission. Whilst the consultation period could have been longer, it is unknown how many submissions were received by the Ministry for the Environment.
No specific consultation on the National Adaptation Plan has been undertaken in Northland.
There will be significant opportunities for engagement with local communities as each of our partner District Councils undertakes their own site-specific climate adaptation plans.
3. Māori impact statement
The draft submission was consulted on directly with members of the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party in late May 2022. Iwi/hapū representatives on the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee were also given specific opportunity provide guidance, feedback and input into the submission and formally endorsed the draft submission at their meeting of 30 May 2022.
No specific consultation on the National Adaptation Plan has been undertaken with Māori in Northland. The Ministry for the Environment conducted five (5) online workshops during the consultation period specifically with and for Māori. A document setting out an indigenous worldview framework for the National Adaptation Plan (the Rauora Framework) accompanied the consultation package. This Framework had been developed by the Iwi Chairs Forum.
There will be significant and specific opportunities for meaningful engagement with iwi, hapū and whanau as each of our partner District Councils undertakes their own location-specific climate adaptation plans. The Te Taitokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy has Māori values at its core and seeks to embed them in council processes. Amongst other things, this will include opportunities for self-directed adaptation by iwi and hapū at scale.
4. Financial implications
The final submission (and indeed submissions from many of our local government colleagues) highlight the vagaries of financing significant, far-reaching challenges around adaptation – particularly the criticality of central government support.
There are no direct financial implications.
5. Implementation issues
This decision provides no additional implementation issues.
6. Significance and engagement
In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy and no additional consultation or engagement is deemed necessary.
7. Policy, risk management and legislative compliance
It is anticipated that the implementation of the National Adaptation Plan will have significant bearing on the way council operates. However, at this stage the architecture of how actions identified in this Plan filter down to a regional scale are unknown. These challenges and opportunities are outlined in our submission.
There are no direct risks posed by the decision to approve this submission retrospectively.
A decision to NOT retrospectively approve this submission (Option 2 above) poses unknown reputational risks to council, particularly with regard to the nature and successful operation of the collaborative approach to climate change adaptation in Te Taitokerau.
Background/Tuhinga
The Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019 introduced a number of new mechanisms to help us address the climate crisis. These include the introduction of the new Climate Commission, and the requirements for a national Emissions Reduction Plan (ERP) and a National Adaptation Plan (NAP). The final ERP was released in full on 16 May 2022.
A draft NAP was released for public consultation on 27 April 2022.
The NAP will have significant bearing and influence the way we can enable on-ground adaptation and deals with significant issues like roles and responsibilities, funding, and managed retreat.
Staff prepared a detailed submission that represents the key region-wide issues and opportunities with the proposed NAP.
The submission represents the views of members of the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee. Each member council has undertaken their own internal consultation and approval process – including canvassing the views of relevant staff, Tiriti partners and elected members.
The final submission is attached.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Submission into the draft National Adaptation Plan by the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee ⇩
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Chair's Report to Council |
From: |
Penny Smart, Chair |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Penny Smart, Chair, on |
Purpose of Report
This report is to receive information from the Chair on meetings/events attended, and correspondence sent for the month of May 2022.
That the report ‘Chair's Report to Council’ by Penny Smart, Chair and dated 14 June 2022, be received.
Meetings/events attended
During this period, I attended the following meetings/events/functions:
· Regional Sector Meeting
· Big Fish filming at Kaipara Service Centre
· Farewell event for Fish and Game Regional Manager
· LGNZ Reforms updates webinars
· Meeting with Northland Rescue Helicopters representative
· Baylys Beach AGM
· 3 Waters meeting with Minister for Local Government
· NZAGRC State of science webinar
· Northland Mayoral Forum
Correspondence
During May 2022 I sent out the following correspondence:
Date |
Addressed To |
Subject |
03.05.2022 |
Eight successful Tertiary Students who live in and/or whakapapa to Te Taitokerau |
Tū I te ora Scholarship |
03.05.2022 |
Future for Local Government Review Panel |
Future for Local Government Review – follow up |
06.05.2022 |
Chairperson, Environment Committee Chairperson, Primary Production Committee |
NRC response to the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Space invaders report: A review of how NZ manages wees that threaten native ecosystems |
18.05.2022 |
Minister of Forestry, Parliament, Wellington |
Sediment and Forestry Issues in Northland |
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Council Meeting item: 8.2
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Chief Executive’s Report to Council |
From: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer, on |
That the report ‘Chief Executive’s Report to Council’ by Malcolm Nicolson, Tumuaki - Chief Executive Officer and dated 30 May 2022, be received.
8.2.1 Highlights
Education Days
A dune lake education day was held at Rotokawau with the help from Enviroschools, Biosecurity, Land Management, Te Uri o Hau and the Taurua whānau. 60 students from both Poutō primary and Te Kopuru school learnt about tuna and fish, biosecurity and kākahi (freshwater mussels). The inclusion of kākahi into this event was important due their presence in the lake and the significance of kākahi to Māori history in the area.
|
|
|
|
Northland Regional Council Environmental Awards – Kiwi Coast ‘Outstanding Group or Project Award’
A new addition to council’s environmental awards this year, the award aims to recognise the outstanding achievements of Northland groups and projects who have proven their commitment to restoring the health of their local native forests and wildlife, including kiwi. The winner of the inaugural award was Bay Bush Action Project for a truly outstanding, community led project with proven results in forest health regeneration and steadily increasing kiwi populations
|
Kiwi Coast outstanding group or project award winners Bush Bay Action. |
8.2.2 CEO’s Office
Department |
Description |
Status |
Consent decision appeal |
Two separate consent applications for replacement and new consents relating to a proposed expansion of, Doug’s Opua Boat Yard in Walls Bay, Ōpua |
Court has advised that a hearing is required for these appeals. The council evidence to be with the Court by 15 June 2022. |
Consent decision appeal |
Irrigation of avocado orchards and horticulture crops |
Court Hearing was held over a two week period from Monday 9 May to Friday 20 May 2022, with an additional day on Wednesday 22 May 2022. The Hearing was not closed and is adjourned until the end of June. The Court will undertake a site visit in mid June. |
A write-off of $12,391.74 (excluding GST) was approved from the account of Otehei Bay Holdings Limited following the direction from the District Court to reach a settlement on unpaid costs sought by council in relation to the processing of a consent application originally made the company.
8.2.3 CORPORATE SERVICES
Fraud Declaration
I am not aware of any fraud nor am I investigating any incidence or suspected incidence of fraud at this time.
Enterprise System Update
8.2.4 regulatory services
During May 2022, a total of 119 Decisions were issued. These decisions comprised:
Moorings |
2 |
|
|
Coastal Permits |
27 |
|
|
Land Discharge Permits |
10 |
|
|
Water Discharge Permits |
4 |
|
|
Land Use Consents |
49 |
|
|
Water Permits |
20 |
|
|
Bore Consents |
7 |
|
|
The processing timeframes for the May 2022 consents ranged from:
224 to 2 calendar days, with the median time being 43 days;
42 to 2 working days, with the median time being 22 days.
Forty-eight applications were received in May 2022.
Of the 187 applications in progress at the end of May 2022:
29 were received more than 12 months ago; |
|
Reasons for being more than 12 months old: |
|
- Awaiting additional information (including CIAs) |
12 |
- Consultation with affected parties/stakeholders |
4 |
- On-hold pending new rules becoming operative |
6 |
- Other |
7 |
20 were received between 6 and 12 months ago (most awaiting further information from the applicant); |
|
138 less than 6 months. |
Appointment of Hearing Commissioners
No commissioners were appointed in May 2022.
Consents Decisions and Progress on Notified Applications in Process, Objections and Appeals
The current level of notified application processing activities at the end of May 2022 is (by number):
Applications Publicly/Limited Notified During Previous Month |
1 |
Progress on Applications Previously Notified |
4 |
Hearings and Decisions |
0 |
Appeals/Objections |
2 |
COMPLIANCE MONITORING
The results of compliance monitoring for the period 1 – 31 May 2022 (and year-to-date figures) are summarised in the following table and discussed below.
Classification |
Total |
Full compliance |
Low risk non-compliance |
Moderate non-compliance |
Significant non-compliance |
Not exercised during period |
Air Discharge |
34 |
28 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Bore Consent |
9 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Coastal Discharge |
25 |
18 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Coastal Permit |
131 |
64 |
23 |
30 |
7 |
7 |
Land Discharge |
179 |
81 |
41 |
10 |
1 |
46 |
Land Use Consent |
154 |
85 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
68 |
Water Discharge |
116 |
78 |
17 |
9 |
2 |
10 |
Water Permit |
95 |
60 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
Water Take |
232 |
136 |
62 |
8 |
0 |
26 |
Total |
975 |
558 |
156 |
59 |
10 |
192 |
Percentage |
|
57.2% |
16.0% |
6.1% |
1.0% |
19.7% |
Year to date |
6477 |
4482 |
816 |
427 |
77 |
675 |
Percentage |
|
69.2% |
12.6% |
6.6% |
1.2% |
10.4% |
Coastal
Compliance reports following monitoring inspections for all marine farms were provided to consent holders. Follow-up enforcement action on marine farms will now be prioritised where moderate to significant non-compliances were recorded. Final coastal structure inspections for the Far North were undertaken and reporting on coastal permit inspections to consent holders was ongoing.
Water, Waste, Air and Land Use (WWALU) Compliance Monitoring
Contaminated Land Management
· Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants
WWTP/Consent Status |
Issues (June 2022) |
Enforcement Action/Response |
Far North District |
||
Ahipara Expires 2033 |
Ongoing non-compliance with bacteriological consent limits |
Under AN FNDC investigating land disposal options; UV system to be installed in 2022/2023 to reduce bacteriological concentrations |
Hihi Expires 30 November 2022 |
No recent issues; replacement consent application yet to be received |
None currently |
Kāeo Expires 31 October 2022 |
No recent issues; replacement consent application yet to be received |
None currently |
Kaikohe Expired 30 November 2021; Replacement consent application in process |
Intermittent non-compliances with ADW flow, ammonia & bacteriological consent limits. System overdue for de-sludging |
None currently Issues will be addressed in replacement consent |
Kaitaia Expired 30 November 2021; Replacement consent application in process |
No recent issues; FNDC discussing with iwi/hapu potential consent conditions |
Under AN (reticulation overflows) Issues will be addressed in replacement consent |
Kawakawa Expires 2036 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Kerikeri Expires 2036 |
No obvious issues from new plant (commissioned in December 2020)
|
Under AN |
Kohukohu Expired 2016; Replacement consent application on hold |
Occasional issues with bacteriological conditions of consent; CIA still awaited before public notification occurs |
None currently |
Opononi & Ōmāpere Expired 2019; Replacement consent application publicly notified and on hold |
Non-compliances with bacteriological consent limits; desludging overdue; still intended to jointly process with Kohukohu replacement consent application |
Under AN Issues will be addressed in replacement consent; desludging to be undertaken |
Paihia Expires 2034 |
Plant upgraded 2019; alkalinity issues preventing optimal ammonia treatment |
None currently Alkalinity improvement project still in progress |
Rangiputa Expires 2032 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Rāwene Expires 2023 |
System overdue for de-sludging |
Infringement notices issued in February 2022 in relation to a discharge from the reticulation |
Russell Expires 2024 |
Occasional non-compliances with E. coli consent limit post UV |
Under AN Infringement notices issued January 2022 |
Taipā Expires 2029 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Whatuwhiwhi Expires 2025 |
Elevated TSS levels (consent limit may be unnecessarily restrictive) |
FNDC to seek consent variation to address TSS levels – however this is not a priority |
Whangarei District |
||
Hikurangi Expires 2025 |
Intermittent issues with plant performance |
None currently Plant performance being reviewed to identify improvements |
Ngunguru Expires 2035 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Ōākura Expires 2025 |
Occasional spikes in E. coli |
None currently |
Portland Expires 2024 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Ruakākā Expires 2046 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Tutukaka Expires 2024 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Waiōtira Expires 2030 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Waipū Expires 2030 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Whāngārei City Expired 30 April 2022; Replacement consent application in process |
Odour issues; replacement consent application received and will be publicly notified shortly |
Abatement notice issued requiring actions to be implemented to mitigate the odour emanating from the treatment plant |
Kaipara District |
||
Dargaville Expires 30 June 2022: Replacement consent application in process |
Non-compliances with WQ discharge volume consent limits, replacement consent application received |
Under AN |
Glinks Gully Expires 2024 |
No recent issues |
None currently |
Kaiwaka Expires 31 October 2022 |
No recent issues; replacement consent application yet to be received |
None currently |
Mangawhai Expires 2042 |
Odour complaints and occasional exceedances of TDS consent limit |
Under AN
|
Maungaturoto Expires 2032 |
Intermittent non-compliances, generally due to high rainfall |
Under AN |
Te Kopuru Expires 2044 |
Intermittent minor non-compliances |
Second aerator installed 2020 |
Environmental Incidents
There were no environmental incidents reported in May which resulted in a significant environmental impact.
ENFORCEMENT
Abatement Notices, Infringement Notices and Formal Warnings
The following is a summary of the abatement and infringement notices issued:
Action Type |
Number |
Abatement Notice |
14 |
Infringement Notice |
3 |
Other Enforcement
Open burning on industrial/trade property – Whangārei
Charges were laid in the Whangārei District Court on 27 November 2020 against an individual for open burning on industrial/trade premises; the burnt items also included prohibited items. Witnesses from both sides gave evidence in court on 25 May 2022. Then the next step is to file submissions by June 2022. The set date for the decision to be released is 4 July 2022 at 10am.
Farm dairy effluent – Parapara
Charges were laid in the Kaitaia District Court on 6 May 2021 against a farm owner for offences which occurred in August 2020. There are four charges against the farm owner. According to the doctors’ reports confirming that the farm owner has mental health issues, the judge concluded the farm owner is to be discharged under section 25(1)(d) of the Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act. The case is concluded with no order for costs to the NRC.
· Vessel occupying CMA & removal of asbestos from CMA – Town Basin, Whangārei
An enforcement order was applied for on 23 November 2021 against an individual for occupying the coastal marine with a boat without consent, and for reimbursement of costs associated with work to remove and dispose of cladding material containing asbestos that had been deposited within the coastal marine area. A settlement on these matters was reached and has been executed.
· Earthworks & vegetation clearance within a wetland – Teal Bay
Charges were laid in the Whangarei District Court on 7 December 2021 against four parties for offences that occurred in December 2020. The offences relate to unconsented earthworks within wetland. NRC will put a proposal to the defendants’ lawyers for negotiation in charges.
8.2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Sustainable Hill Country and Regional Priorities
Milestones |
Status |
Farm Environment Plans (FEPs) |
A change in process and reporting template from Farm Environment Plans to Soil Conservation Plans resulted in a slow start to the completion of plans. Consequently, by the middle of the year we had underdelivered on the number of plans/hectares covered leaving us in a position of playing catchup. A late flurry of completed plans (particularly large farms) meant we have now met the hectare target by completing 85 plans covering 27,864ha (100% of hectare target achieved). |
Objective |
Status |
Harvest |
Harvest is underway with delivery scheduled for later this month. We have orders for 8,440 subsidised poplar and willow trees, exceeding our 7000 target (120% of target achieved). We have additional demand for 1009 trees for non-erosion control purposes such as shelter belts and livestock shade. These trees will be supplied at full price if there is stock remaining after the subsidised tree orders for soil conservation purposes have been satisfied. |
Key updates for this project:
· The deed variation to include the Otaika catchment and extend the timeframe until January 2024 has been signed by both parties.
· The Year 3 annual work plan and Year 2 Quarter 3 report have been accepted by MFE.
· Planting projects continue to lag behind the projected KPI. There are currently only three projects approved for this planting season. The extension of the project into the Otaika catchment will hopefully improve this.
· The recruitment process to replace the previous Project Manager has been completed, with an internal applicant successful. Having a full-time team member focusing on this project again will help extend the outreach to landowners and achieve KPI’s.
biodiversity
Māori Partnerships
The Roto Tapokapoka Tūhono Wānanga (Dune Lakes Partnerships Wānanga) was held at Lake Waikare, in the Te Roroa rohe of Kai Iwi Lakes. This was considered a landmark wānanga, a first in gathering around 40 kaitiaki from 6 different hapū and iwi together to connect, build relationships and develop a vision for our dune lake taonga. With the FIF Dune Lakes Project is in its final year, we explored how hapū and iwi would like to work with NRC to look after dune lakes and what a partnership might look like moving forward. Each region shared their aspirations and expectations while learning practical monitoring skills and sharing understandings about the ecology and cultural significance of ngā roto in Te Tai Tokerau. Feedback has been very positive from each of the iwi/hapū that came.
|
|
|
|
Aquatic weed and pest fish control
Staff removed 107 invasive tench (Tinca tinca) from Lake Kapoai, Te Koporu. Adult tench had a mean length of 402mm and a mean weight of 0.85kg. A wider range of net mesh sizes were used compared to previous attempts and this was successful in targeting adult tench, providing insight into the size range of tench in the lake.
Biodiversity staff held a field trip with Renew School year science 13 students, which followed a pre visit lesson earlier in the week to introduce dune ecology, function and monitoring methods. We started with a 5-minute bird count, checked lizard shelters and then measured the four vegetations transects set up last year. The school has been set up as a site admin on the coastal monitoring database and will be entering the vegetation data collected.
|
Dune monitoring with Renew School: checking lizard shelters, vegetation monitoring and five-minute bird count |
|
Wetlands
Council staff continue to work with MWLR, as part of an Envirolink funded project, to identify what enhancements would be required to councils current wetland monitoring programme to meet the requirements of the NPS-FM.
Biodiversity staff are part of the Kaimaumau Ecosystem Technical Advisory Group (TAG) advising a multi-agency Governance Group on recovery of the wetland after a major fire swept through the area over summer. A site visit was made with mana whenua, Department of Conservation, and ecologists from the TAG considering issues around weed spread, drains, threatened species management and restoration opportunities
|
Motutangi drain running through the Kaimaumau Wetland with firebreak and weedy wattle regeneration.
|
|
Regeneration of native species in a heavily burnt area of manuka peat bog.
|
Natural resources
Coastal/Water Quality Operations
· Consultation with tangata whenua on new water quality State of the Environment sampling sites is being undertaken.
· Quarterly litter surveys were undertaken at Hātea and Onerahi sites (results pending). An additional four sites were also included (Church Bay, Pacific Bay, Matapōuri and Sandy Bay), all of which returned low yields of plastic pollution.
· All freshwater continuous water quality monitoring stations have been installed as per the recent monitoring network review and LTP budget. These stations collect data every 15 minutes, providing a wealth of information on the water quality of the site.
Natural Resources Science
Air quality and carbon emission
· Comparison of council’s CO2-e (carbon dioxide equivalent) monthly emissions between 2021 and 2022 is presented in the graph below. The council’s monthly carbon emission in 2022 recorded lower than 2021 emission. The decreased emission in 2022 is attributed to the current COVID-19 restrictions. The graph is based on live data and therefore the figures for the last few months are subject to change.
|
Freshwater quality
· The contract for procuring a LiDAR based high resolution digital river network (DRN) model with the Water Technology NZ Ltd is progressing well. The Rivers team is providing technical assistance.
· The draft GIS layers for the Northern Wairoa catchment has been reviewed and the deliverables are due by mid-June 2022.
|
An example snapshot of DRN catchments (dark grey lines) with river lines at 2ha (dark blue), and 0.2ha (light blue) scales in Tangiterōria. Dark brown dots indicate start and end points of each river segment. The yellow jagged lines are currently available coarser catchments (i.e. NIWA river network model). |
· A river water quality workshop was presented by the Freshwater and Monitoring team to the Year 11 students from Whangārei Boys High School in the beginning of May, which received positive feedback from the school.
· Works related to the development of a NEMS (National Environmental and Monitoring Standards) protocol for sampling and processing planktonic cyanobacteria are ongoing. This NEMS protocol will mainly focus on lakes to assist in implementing the NPS-FM cyanobacteria attributes. The final draft of this NEMS protocol is currently being reviewed by the NEMS working group.
Natural Resources Data
· Data automation project for processing continuous data:
The contract for services for Phase 1 “feasibility and discovery” of the project is being finalised with Orbica Limited. This initial phase will involve regular workshops and meetings with Orbica Limited to define the needs, complete a gap analysis at NRC and understand the current data processing and handling methods. The contract for services for Phase 2 “Planning, Research & Development” will be finalised by the end of June 2022.
· The data team has contracted a consultant from HyQuest Solutions to help us with the final phases of the implementation of the KiEco biological database and historical data import.
Hydrology
Rainfall
· May 2022 was drier than normal.
· Overall autumn was a classic La Niña rainfall distribution across the region, with wetter than normal conditions on the East and dry to the North and the West.
|
|
|
Rivers · River flows generally reflect rainfall distribution across the region. The Kaihū and the Awanui Rivers are quite low for this time of year (note though, that flows are categorised relative to time of year, so flows are not as low as typical summer conditions; there are no water resourcing concerns). · Most rivers on the east recorded “Normal” or “Above Normal” flows.
|
Groundwater Groundwater levels continue to be categorised as “Normal” to “Above Normal”
|
|
POLICY AND PLANNING
Review of the Regional Policy Statement
Work is underway on the 5 yearly review of the RPS required under section 35 of the RMA. MTAG has selected a consultant to assist them in providing input to the review from a tangata whenua perspective and the district councils have had an initial briefing on the process. The project will be completed by the end of the year ready for consideration when the new council is convened and available for decision making.
Proposed Regional Plan Appeals
Staff continue to work towards resolving the remaining appeals on a range of topics. Key points arising since the last report are:
· Council is due to report progress to the Court on topics 1 (coastal activities), 6 (damming and diverting water and land drainage), 10 (infrastructure, energy, and natural hazards) and 1A (vehicles on beaches) by 30 June. If appeals remain unresolved after 30 June, council staff will confer with parties and request that these matters be set down for a hearing.
· In January’s CEO report staff advised that the Environment Court approved the process for mapping Outstanding Natural Landscapes in the Coastal Marine Area. Part of this process was to map cultural landscapes of significance to Tangata Whenua with support of a consultant with expertise in engagement with Tangata Whenua and Landscape Architecture. Unfortunately, staff were not successful in securing the required expertise within the allocated budget. At the time of writing, a workshop with council was scheduled for 21 June to discuss the next steps for councils before seeking direction from the Environment Court on how to proceed.
Freshwater Plan Change
Staff gave a presentation to key stakeholders (e.g., District Councils, Northland DHB, Fish and Game, Doc, Forest & Bird) on our freshwater plan change process, freshwater framework, and the opportunity for these parties to engage at this point in the freshwater plan change process.
Staff also met with Auckland Regional Council staff to discuss our respective freshwater plan change processes, particularly our alignment of planning provisions in the Kaipara catchment.
The NIWA mitigation scenario and costing information will be presented to the next Primary Sector Liaison Group meeting (21 June).
A meeting has been scheduled for 15 July with the ‘Wai Māori Group’ - a subgroup of the iwi members of ILGACE (Iwi and Local Government Chief Executives).
Staff will be presenting to the executive management team of Te Rūnanga-A-Iwi O Ngāpuhi on 22 June.
TTMAC approved the ‘Stage 1’ report prepared by the Tangata Whenua Water Advisory Group (TWWAG) at their 9 June meeting. The Stage 1 report sets out freshwater matauranga Māori to set the foundation for TWWAGs development of recommended freshwater planning provisions.
8.2.6 BIOSECURITY
Feral deer
· Deer farm escape: A lone deer escape reported from a Paparoa deer farm was resolved with the farmer and council working together to recapture a young stag. However, continued surveillance with game cameras (left in situ after the recapture), have identified a further escapee – a red hind still on the outside of the fence. Council staff are continuing to work with the farmer to recapture the escapee.
|
· Reported fallow deer release: Extensive enquiries into the report of 20 fallow deer released at the Tangihua Range have produced no evidence to support the report after several days of investigation. The release information came from word of mouth that the liberation occurred rather than an actual sighting of the animals. Regardless of this, a leaflet drop to residents has been undertaken around the location.
· Kaitāia fallow deer sighting: A reported fallow deer sighting near Kaitāia last month is being followed up by the deer response contractor using thermal surveillance, tracker dogs and ground hunting. There are historic reports going back to 2020 of the fallow deer sightings in the area so it appears there is a small herd there. There are 19 landowners who have given permission to respond in the vicinity.
Feral pigs
There has been a small number of enquiries in relation to access to council pig traps as winter sets in and pig damage to pasture and sightings increase.
FRESHWATER PESTS
· Grass carp removal, Lake Swan: A grass carp removal operation at Lake Swan on the Poutō Peninsula involved setting 32 gill nets over two days and captured 11 grass carp.
· Tench removal, Lake Kapoai: A joint Biosecurity-Biodiversity operation to remove tench from Lake Kapoai on the Poutō Peninsula was conducted over 2½ days and removed 117 tench.
Tench
removal, Lake Kapoai, Te Kōpuru; (clockwise from top left):
Setting gill nets, field examination of removed tench, measuring tench, Lake
Kapoai, some of the 117 removed fish.
KAURI PROTECTION
Waitangi marae wānanga
A council kauri protection officer arranged a wānanga for approximately 20 rangatahi at Waitangi marae. Biosecurity officers presented topics including kauri protection, pest animals, pest plants, Predator Free 2050 and marine biosecurity. The young people were very engaged and the possibility for extending this to a day of practical application was discussed for further opportunities such as this in the future.
Waitangi Treaty Ground hygiene stations
Discussions are underway with Waitangi Treaty Ground staff and the Ministry for Primary Industries regarding installation of hygiene stations at the grounds and advocacy for kauri protection.
PARTNERSHIPS
Northland Regional Council – Kiwi Coast partnership
· Annual Regional Pest Control Workshop: For the first time the wānanga was an online workshop (or “Zui”). The online workshop was well received with 176 people registered from Northland, wider New Zealand and even Australia, Europe, and USA! Topics covered were based on three themes of “Northland Research and Results”, ‘Perspectives and Projects’, and “Trappers and Tools”. The online workshop was very well received by participants and received a lot of unsolicited positive feedback which is best summed up as “brilliant job”.
Kiwi Link High Value Area
· Pest control results 2021: Pest control results for 2021 have been collated with a grand total of 9,038 pest removed during the year. Over half the total pest (4,598) were possums, of which over half (2,830) were trapped by the Owhiwa Landcare and Whareora Landcare groups. In the five years the Kiwi Link project has been running a total of 36,487 pests have been removed from the project area.
Whangārei Heads High Value Area
· Annual kiwi call count: The annual kiwi count is well under way with keen counters at most of the 20 sites throughout the Whangārei Heads area counting kiwi calls and working out approximate kiwi locations. The call counting period started well with a good week of calm weather, but the wind, rain, and surf noise (and busy lives) are making things tricky for those trying to finish their four nights counting.
Tutukaka High Value Area
· Predator control: Whilst possum catches have generally decreased since January, the high value area’s total catch for2020-2021 is 1,026.
· Biodiversity – uncommon species: A special kākā sighting was made in Sandy Bay in mid-May (Figure 2.), in an area where they have not been seen before. It is hoped that these sightings are an indicator of the habitat improvements being achieved.
A special kaka sighting in Sandy Bay. |
Tānekaha Community Pest Control Area A scheduled transmitter change for Ellis the kiwi in the Tānekaha Community Pest Control Area provided the opportunity for kiwi liaison with Ngāti Hau.
A Ngāti hau member with Ellis the kiwi |
PREDATOR FREE
Predator Free Whangārei
· Project area activities: The project has been busy with continuous servicing of traps and bait stations in Working Block 1 and surrounding areas. Both possums and kiwi are being detected by trail cameras in the project area.
Whangārei Heads PF2050 project trail camera detections since August 2021 of possums (left - red) and kiwi (right – green). |
MARINE BIOSECURITY
Hull surveillance
In the past month, divers surveyed 372 vessels as part of the hull surveillance programme with an additional 20 vessels surveyed by kaitiaki using a pole camera. Most vessels surveyed were based in berths at either Marsden Cove Marina or Ōpua Marina. There was 18 incidents of Sabella spallanzanii (Mediterranean fanworm), two incidents of Styela clava (clubbed tunicate) and 58 incidents of Eudistoma elongatum (Australian droplet tunicate) found on vessel hulls. Eudistoma elongatum were present in small buds which is typical for this time of year because of colder water temperatures. Most incidents where S. spallanzanii was found located on vessels were determined to be local recruitment and were removed by divers. However, one detection was the result of a vessel moving when it was unclean and arriving infected with Sabella- the owner was subsequently directed to haul and clean and this was undertaken the following day at the owner’s cost. In addition, there were two incidents of Clavelina lepadiformis (lightbulb ascidian) at Marsden Cove Marina where this species is known to be present.
Table 1: Hull Surveillance Programme Results to 9 June 2022
Hull Surveillance Programme Results |
Total this period |
Total |
Pathways Plan Compliance if Moving* |
|
|
Number of vessels surveyed this period |
392 |
1999 |
% Pathways Plan Compliance if Moving (all vessels) * |
53.1 |
52.5 |
Vessels found with Marine Pests |
|
|
Sabella spallanzanii (fanworm) |
18 |
59 |
Styela clava (clubbed tunicate) |
2 |
47 |
Undaria pinnatifida (Japanese kelp) |
0 |
0 |
Eudistoma elongatum (Australian droplet tunicate) |
58 |
86 |
Pyura doppelgangera (sea squirt) |
0 |
0 |
* This is the percentage of vessels surveyed that complied with the acceptable level of ‘light fouling’ as defined in the Marine Pathway Plan. Note: actual compliance is higher given not all these vessels will move from one designated place to another.
Hutchwilco Boat Show
Council marine biosecurity staff attended the Hutchwilco Boat Show in Auckland alongside colleagues from the Top of the North Marine Biosecurity Partnership (DOC, MPI, Auckland Council, Gisborne District Council, and Bay of Plenty, Waikato, and Hawkes Bay regional councils). This event provides an excellent opportunity to engage with boaties from all regions about the importance of keeping vessels clean and communicate important, up to date information about current marine biosecurity issues. |
|
Top of the North staff explaining identification tips
for |
Student Seminars
Marine biosecurity staff have continued engagement with both the Bay of Islands College and NorthTec students studying management of environmental and biodiversity issues. The Papa Taiao class at Bay of Islands College aims to have a marine biosecurity focus on their upcoming assessment, using Mediterranean fanworm in Ōpua as a case study. Students will use eDNA sampling to delimit the current population of this pest thus adding a valuable element to council’s ongoing efforts. NorthTec students will also take a more analytical approach to marine biosecurity by working with staff to assess gaps and challenges faced by those working in Biosecurity in New Zealand.
Top of the North Webinar Series
Council marine biosecurity staff, along with other council representatives from the Top of the North (TON) partnership, presented a webinar about marine pests in the Top of North region. The webinar attracted more than 40 participants from all over New Zealand who were engaged and encouraged about the progress the TON collaboration has made in recent years. The webinar series (jointly coordinated by TON and the Top of the South partnerships) has been running for most of the year, attracting hundreds of viewers. The series has provided accurate and accessible information to boat owners, regulators, treaty partners and important stakeholders about marine biosecurity issues and the progress Aotearoa has made in this space.
PEST PLANTS
Eradication Plants
· Batwing passionflower: The Kamo bush blocks grid search and control rounds are nearly complete and are on track for completion in early June.
· Spartina: A drone survey of inlet in the Whangārei and Kaipara Harbours has been conducted to identify new infestation areas. Results of the survey will be available in June.
Progressive containment plants
The resumption of fieldworks has allowed a much-needed catchup on inspections that had fallen behind schedule.
· Mile a minute: Five reports generated by a recent mailout at Bayleys Beach were followed up with a further 16 new infestation sites identified in the extended survey area.
· Manchurian wild rice: The second round of Manchurian wild rice control is 95% complete and are on track for completion by mid-June. The quarterly report to the Ministry for Primary Industries has also been completed.
· Manchurian
wild rice infestation – Matakohe forestry block: Treatment of a Matakohe forestry block Manchurian
wild rice infestation |
Sustained control plants
Staff continue to work through the backlog of sustained control pest plant species requests that built up whilst Covid-19 restrictions impacted on delivery of this work. A total of 13 notices of direction were in different stages of enforcement during the month.
8.2.7 GOVERNANCE AND ENGAGEMENT
MĀORI ENGAGEMENT
Te Whāriki Core Cultural Competency Programme
As an ongoing commitment to develop staff and council cultural competency a Level 1 Te Whariki workshop was facilitated by the Kaiarahi Kaupapa Maori for new council staff at Terenga Paraoa Marae on May 16, 2022.
Facilitators David Tapine presenting importance of te reo Māori me ōna waiata o Te Taitokerau. |
Te Tiriti Health Check
This work is progressing well for recommendations to be provided to council by August 2022. This will be conducted in Partnership with TTMAC to guide and advise the process alongside independent contractors as noted below:
Independent contractors Paul Beverley, Buddle Findlay and Tai Ahu, Whaia Legal have been engaged to work at Governance, Executive Leadership Team and TTMAC with leadership in the process provided by the tangata whenua caucus of TTMAC.
A full staff survey is being worked on and due to go live shortly aligned with the Te Arawhiti framework and its recommendations.
Analysis and recommendations will be provided by independent contractors focused on areas of development as identified by TTMAC which include Governance, Relationships with Maori, service design and delivery.
Kete of resources developed and shared end May with iwi, hapū and promoted via appropriate communications platforms.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Investment and Growth Reserve – Projects Report
Update |
Future developments/ reporting |
|
REL |
Received draft repayment proposal. Made changes following council workshop and discussion with lawyers and provided revision back to Maher Jammal. |
Waiting for response from Jammal. |
Hundertwasser Art Centre with Wairau Māori Art Gallery |
Received final project costings and marketing report as per funding agreement. |
Completed. |
Water storage – Council workshops held to present investment options of the Kaipara and Mid-North water storahe schemes being developed by the Te Tai Tokerau Water Trust. Multiple discussions were held in preparation for this with members of the Trust and Tupu Tonu.
Walking and Cycling – Led meeting of key stakeholders (district councils, Waka Kotahi, DoC, WAC, Bike Northland, Te Araroa Northland Trust, etc) on implementation of the Strategy.
Digital – Provided briefing to the Northland Mayoral Forum on various digital-related actions including information for the hope-to-soon-be-arranged meeting with the Minister.
Land Use Geospatial Layer Project – RFP was published on GETS on 17 May, and answers to questions provided. Tender closes Monday 13 June.
TTMAC – Assisted with organising an update on economic development to be provided to TTMAC by Northland Inc members.
CLUES scenarios and costings – Continued working with the Policy and Planning Team on scenario costings and additional scenario options.
ONLINE CHANNELS
Most popular content on Facebook: Facebook post of congratulations for our Marketing and Engagement Manager, Natasha Stubbing. Co-winning the Taituarā — Local Government Professionals Aotearoa Emerging Leader Award (26 May 2022). Reaching 4,434 customers with engagement of 808.
*Engaged – number of people who ‘reacted’, commented, or shared the post
Key Performance Indicators |
Jan-22 |
Feb-22 |
Mar-22 |
Apl-22 |
May-22 |
WEB |
|
|
|
|
|
# Visits to the NRC website |
41,600 |
34,400 |
35,900 |
37,900 |
31,600 |
E-payments made |
7 |
16 |
14 |
7 |
11 |
# subscription customers (cumulative) |
1,263 |
1,385 |
1,378 |
1,368 |
1,366 |
SOCIAL MEDIA (CUMULATIVE) |
|
|
|
|
|
# Twitter followers |
1,567 |
1,566 |
1,564 |
1,570 |
1,580 |
# NRC Facebook fans |
10,510 |
10,600 |
10,600 |
10,600 |
10,700 |
# NRC Overall Facebook Reach |
157,700 |
207,200 |
189,900 |
62,700 |
44,000 |
# NRC Engaged Daily Users |
2,755 |
4,807 |
8,442 |
3,838 |
3,507 |
# CDEM Facebook fans |
26,117 |
26,200 |
26,300 |
26,300 |
26,300 |
# CDEM Overall Facebook Reach |
214,100 |
171,100 |
103,300 |
111,100 |
37,000 |
# CDEM Engaged Daily Users |
26,600 |
19,500 |
5,564 |
7,168 |
1,895 |
# Instagram followers |
1,488 |
1,506 |
1,520 |
1,526 |
1,540 |
ENVIROSCHOOLS / EDUCATION
Enviroschools’ sustainability
milestones celebrated
On 4 May, Cr Jack Craw arrived on his bike to Geckos Early Learning Centre
to celebrate them becoming a Bronze Enviroschool. They are enjoying a
‘wild’ area housing lizards and insects, growing their own kai and
creating a uniquely-Aotearoa space of plants and structures. The centre
looks forward to further exploring te ao Māori through pūrākau
and ngā atua.
On 9 May, Renew School also celebrated becoming a Bronze Enviroschool with Cr Jack Craw. The students’ plant and animal pest control mahi, stream studies and involvement in the wider community is admirable.
On 23 May Cr Joce Yeoman joined in Oromahoe School’s Enviroschools Silver celebration. This school community includes a junior class of skink experts, meaningfully embraces te ao Māori with embedded tikanga and looks forward to exploring leadership at all levels of the school.
Teachers
pest control workshop held
On 24 May, 20 teachers gathered to learn more
about using trapping hardware, how to integrate pest control into the
curriculum and how to help their local ngahere thrive. The Enviroschools
and Biosecurity teams ran the workshop in conjunction with Tiakina Whangarei
and the Pukenui Forest Trust.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
2022 Whakamānawa ā Taiao Environmental Awards
Winners of the fourth annual Whakamānawa ā Taiao Environmental Awards were announced on Thursday 26 May, at a celebration in Dargaville attended by over 150 finalists and supporters.
The 2022 overall winner of Te Tohu Matua - Supreme Award went to Te Kotahitanga e Mahi Kaha Trust - Project Ngā Wai Ora o Ngāpuhi for their community focused restoration of waterways around Kaikohe. The project won the Environmental Action in Water Quality Improvement award and also placed Highly Commended in the Kaitiakitanga category.
The 2022 category winners are:
Environmental action in the community - Vision Kerikeri and Friends of Wairoa Stream
Environmental action in pest management - Kerikeri Peninsula Conservation Charitable Trust
Environmental action in education - Tangiteroria School
Environmental action in water quality improvement - Te Kotahitanga e Mahi Kaha Trust - Project Ngā Wai Ora o Ngāpuhi
Environmental leadership - Hori Parata
Kaitiakitanga - Te Toa Whenua
Youth environmental leader - Curtis Robinson & Jayden Edwards - Junior Fishery Officers.
Also new in 2022 is the Kiwi Coast Outstanding group or project award, recognising high achieving Northland groups and projects who have proven their commitment to restoring the health of their local native forests and wildlife, including kiwi. This special award has been introduced to broaden the reach of the awards and to support NRC partners to celebrate and recognise mahi specific to their core focus.
The Kiwi Coast Outstanding Group or Project Award went to Bay Bush Action.
More information about the Whakamānawa ā Taiao Environmental Awards programme, details of all the winners and photos from the awards celebration is available at awards.nrc.govt.nz. A full-page spread will also feature in the Northern Advocate in late June.
Emerging Leader Award
Our Marketing & Engagement Manager, Natasha Stubbing, has been named one of two winners of the AskYourTeam Emerging Leader of the Year Award at the 2022 LGFA Taituarā Local Government Excellence Awards.
The award recognizes an emerging leader, aged 35 or under, who has a proven track record of designing or delivering innovative and successful programmes, projects, processes or practices with an identifiable community impact.
As her prize, Natasha will travel with the Taituarā President and Chief Executive to the ICMA Conference in Columbus, Ohio in September this year.
2022 Tū i te Ora Scholarship winners
The eight recipients of Northland Regional Council's Tū i te Ora Scholarships programme for 2022 were confirmed as: Aya Morris, Fern Donovan, Josh Otene, Maria Secker, Rosa Harper, Shavonne Toko, Taiawhio Wati, and Tayla Bamber. Each received $3000 toward their tertiary studies.
More details on the winners and what they are studying can be found here: https://www.nrc.govt.nz/our-northland/story/?id=74458
Communications
Communications issued in May included seven media releases covering the following topics:
Duck shooters, eel fishers asked to help stop weed spread
Air Force to help Piroa/Brynderwyn conservation work
‘Wallaby’ spotted in Kaipara likely a hare
First region-wide climate adaptation strategy adopted in Northland
Eight $3000 Tū i te ora Scholarships awarded
Young leader recognised at national awards
Project Nga Wai Ora ō Ngāpuhi named Whakamānawa ā Taiao
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INFORMATION (LGOIMA) REQUESTS
Total LGOIMAs |
Apr 2020 to May 2021 |
Apr 2021 to May 2022 |
14 |
16 |
|
Number of LGOIMAs not responded to within 20 working days |
0 |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
Telephone inbound call statistics and enquiries
|
Mar 2022 |
April 2022 |
May 2022 |
Call volume via Customer Services |
2254 |
1847 |
2072 |
Average wait time |
7.6 secs |
5.4 secs |
7.8 secs |
Telephone call volume over the last three years
|
1 July 2018 – |
1 July 2019 – |
1 July 2020 – |
Call volume via Customer Services |
20,812 |
30,566 |
31,130 |
Mailroom email processing performance
|
March |
April |
May |
Mail processed |
851 |
716 |
913 |
Satisfaction monitoring
No compliments in the month of May.
The complaint is being resolved
Feedback cards, compliments, and complaints
Compliments received |
Total |
Feedback cards |
0 |
Total compliments recorded |
0 |
Complaints received |
Total |
City Link |
1 |
Total complaints recorded |
1 |
8.2.8 COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
TRANSPORT
REGIONAL TRANSPORT PLANNING
Speed Limit Rule
Settings of Speed Limit Rule
A new Setting of Speed Limits Rule came into effect on 19 May 2022. This new Rule replaces the 2017 Rule and creates a new focus on speed management and promotes a regionwide approach to setting safe and appropriate speeds on both the local and State Highway network.
Regional Speed Management Plans
The purpose of the Regional Speed Management Plan is to ensure regional consistency in the approach to setting safe and appropriate speed limits. The Plans are also intended to enable better integration of speed management with infrastructure investment by aligning with the RLTP.
The District Council, as a Road Controlling Authority (RCA) has the principal role of identifying proposed speed limits. This includes undertaking the technical assessment of the proposed speed limit that ensures the proposed limits are compliant with the technical requirements set out in the new Rule and must be considered under the Rule.
The Regional Transport Committee (RTC) has a role to prepare the Consultation Draft Regional Speed Management Plan. This includes:
· Compiling the information received from the District Councils into a single cohesive plan.
· Determining if the approaches to speed limits across the region are consistent and working with the RCA’s to make appropriate changes to ensure consistency.
· Provide the Regional Council with the Consultation Draft.
The RTC role is principally that of coordinator, editor and approver of the Draft Speed Management Plan. Once finalised, the RTC is responsible for providing the Draft Plan to the Director of Waka Kotahi for certification.
The Regional Council has a new role to facilitate public consultation on the Draft Plan. Consultation includes but is not limited to publishing the Plan and accepting written submissions.
PASSENGER TRANSPORT ADMINISTRATION
*Bus Link figures are reported one month in arrears, due to the required information being unavailable at the time of the agenda deadline.
Bus Link stats for April 2022 (revenue ex GST) |
Actual |
Budget |
Variance |
Year/Date Actual |
Year/Date Budgeted |
Variance |
CityLink passengers |
20,577 |
25,289 |
4,712 |
223,410 |
264,040 |
40,630 |
CityLink fares |
$23,996 |
$32,623 |
$8,627 |
$249,835 |
$340,612 |
$90,777 |
Mid North link passengers |
99 |
96 |
3 |
1,370 |
1,464 |
94 |
Mid North Link fares |
$354 |
$480 |
$126 |
$5,033 |
$7,320 |
$2,287 |
Hokianga Link passengers |
66 |
48 |
18 |
730 |
726 |
4 |
Hokianga Link fares |
$410 |
$334 |
$76 |
$3,865 |
$5,760 |
$1,895 |
Far North Link passengers |
276 |
377 |
101 |
2,342 |
3,823 |
1,481 |
Far North Link fares |
$553 |
$954 |
$401 |
$5,615 |
$9,671 |
$4,056 |
Bream Bay Link passengers |
73 |
24 |
49 |
465 |
258 |
207 |
Bream Bay Link fares collected |
$502 |
$87 |
$415 |
$2,831 |
$929 |
$1,902 |
Hikurangi Link passengers |
22 |
24 |
2 |
199 |
246 |
47 |
Hikurangi Link fares |
$58 |
$63 |
$5 |
$478 |
$673 |
$195 |
Bus Link stats for May 2022 (revenue ex GST) |
Actual |
Budget |
Variance |
Year/Date Actual |
Year/Date Budgeted |
Variance |
CityLink Passengers |
31,953 |
27,027 |
4,926 |
255,287 |
291,067 |
35,780 |
CityLink Revenue |
$36,130 * |
$34,865 |
$1,266 |
$305,637 |
$375,476 |
-$69,839 |
Mid North Link Passengers |
228 |
108 |
120 |
1598 |
1572 |
26 |
Mid North Link Revenue |
$893* |
$540 |
$353 |
$5,787 |
$7,860 |
$2,073 |
Hokianga Link Passengers |
94 |
54 |
40 |
828 |
780 |
48 |
Hokianga Link Revenue |
$367 * |
$376 |
-$9 |
$4,410 |
$5,426 |
$1,016 |
Far North Link Passengers |
334 |
405 |
-71 |
2,676 |
4,227 |
1,551 |
Far North Link Revenue |
$710 * |
$1,024 |
-$314 |
$5,920 |
$10,695 |
$4,775 |
Bream Bay Link Passengers |
38 |
24 |
14 |
503 |
282 |
221 |
Bream Bay Link Revenue |
$312 * |
$86 |
$226 |
$2,987
|
$1,015
|
$1,972 |
Hikurangi Link Passengers |
5 |
24 |
-19 |
204 |
270 |
-66 |
Hikurangi Link Revenue |
$14* |
$63 |
-$56 |
$485 |
$735 |
-$250 |
* = 50% Farebox + 50% Waka Kotahi
*The fares collected are recorded at 50% actual fares taken + the 50% funded by Waka Kotahi (to be claimed)
Waka Kotahi have stated that the government's COVID-19 Farebox Recovery Funding Policy will be terminated on 30 June 2022. Staff will be working on the potential financial impact that move may have on all Northland Regional Council contracted bus services.
National Bus Driver Shortage
The national driver shortage continues to have an impact on our Citylink services with the current CityLink contractor being unable to provide the necessary levels to implement our proposed School Services.
Half Price Fares
There was a definite increase in passengers carried during the month of May due in large to the half price fares. However, this government initiative, which has been open to all passengers, will cease at the end of August 2022 and will only be available to Community Card holders.
Rose Street Bus Terminus Upgrade
The Stage 1 project for the upgrade of the Rose Street bus terminus is scheduled for completion at the end of June 2022. The CityLink service bus stops will then move back from their temporary location in Vine Street.
Youth Week – Free CityLink buses
Northland Regional Council teamed up with Whangarei Youth Space and Whangarei District Council to provide free bus passes for Youth week 9-14 May 2022, to encourage our youth to try public transport, this resulted in 562 free tickets being presented.
Total Mobility (TM)
*Total Mobility Scheme figures are reported one month in arrears, due to the required information being unavailable at the time of the agenda deadline.
|
Total Clients |
Monthly Actual Expend |
Monthly Budgeted Expend |
Monthly Variance |
Year/Date Actual Expend |
Year/Date Budgeted Expend |
Annual Variance |
April 2022
|
1,284 |
$20,710 |
$25,000 |
-$4,290 |
$193,229 |
$250,000 |
-$56,771 |
Total Mobility half price fares
From Friday 1 April 2022 until Wednesday 31 August 2022, Total Mobility journeys will have an additional discount applied to the already subsidised fare. This has been made available as part of the Government’s 50% public transport Initiative. These fares are 100% claimable from Waka Kotahi, for the month of April, the fares forgone were $10,305, making the sum of Total Mobility figures - $31,015. This government initiative will cease at the end of August 2022.
Total Mobility Scheme – Far North
NRC staff continue to work on the Far North Total Mobility Scheme, going live 1 July. The Far North District Council endorsed the development of a Total Mobility Scheme as one of the planning activities in its “Far North District Council Integrated Transport Plan”. $31,000 local share to assist the NRC in the development of trial Total Mobility services in 2022 has been included in the Far North District Council Long Term Plan 2021-2031. The Far North Scheme will have an annual operational budget for the first year of $75,000. 40% ($31,000) of this is funded through local share and 60% ($45,000) through national funding assistance.
ROAD SAFETY UPDATE
Road Trauma Update
Road Fatalities Statistics for the period 1 January 2021 – 10 June 2021
Fatalities Jan – June 2021 |
Far North |
Whangārei |
Kaipara |
Northland |
National |
Local roads |
2 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
80 |
State highways |
5 |
2 |
4 |
11 |
67 |
TOTAL |
7 |
4 |
5 |
16 |
147 |
Road Fatalities Statistics for the period 1 January 2022 – 10 June 2022
Fatalities Jan – June 2022 |
Far North |
Whangārei |
Kaipara |
Northland |
National |
Local roads |
3 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
96 |
State highways |
3 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
71 |
TOTAL |
6 |
4 |
2 |
12 |
167 |
Motorcycle Safety - Ride Forever (R4E) Rider Training Update
· R4E – 2020/2021 – 186 riders completed the three courses
· R4E – 2021/2022 – 165 riders have completed courses to date:
o Bronze Course – 72
o Silver Course – 45
o Gold Course – 48
Waka Kotahi & NZ Police Road Safety Promotion/Media themes for May 2022
Road safety promotional and media related themes for the above-mentioned months will concentrate around:
· Speed, Safe Vehicles, Drugs & Young Drivers
At the local level, Northland continues to produce radio, print, bus backs along with other social media to promote road safety messages specific to Northland and complimenting the ‘Road to Zero’ and ‘Safe System Approach.’
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
National Partnership Charter
Over the past 15 months NEMA and the CDEM Group Managers have collaborated on the development of a Partnership Charter that sets out how NEMA and CDEM Group offices will collaboratively work together. This is a new initiative, having been developed by NEMA officials and the 16 CDEM group managers.
The purpose of the Partnership Charter is to outline a shared vision for an effective and enduring strategic partnership at the regional and national level, which will provide a strong “back-bone” that supports the broader emergency management sector and stakeholders, and the roadmap to achieving this. It includes:
• A shared Kaupapa (vision)
• How our functions align and support each other
• How NEMA and Groups work together
• Partnership aspirations
• What actions to take to support the achievement of our partnership aspirations.
Trifecta Programme
At the National Emergency Managers Development Group (NEMDG) meeting in May, NEMA officials ran a workshop to further refine and develop policy proposals for the Bill. The purpose of the NEMDG session was to gather any final feedback to inform the proposals to be presented to Minister Allan. Consultation with Minsters and departments will then follow before final approval from cabinet is sought, hopefully in late July and August, which will allow sufficient time for the Bill to be drafted and go into the House towards the end of the year (post local body elections).
Recently released cabinet papers, which can be located at: https://www.civildefence.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/publications/Proactive-Release-Emergency-Management-System-Reform.pdf summarise the policy proposals forming the changes to the new bill.
The key areas where changes are being made are:
1. Clarifying the roles and responsibilities of CDEM Groups and local authorities. NEMA is proposing to allocate separate functions through the Bill to clarify that: CDEM Groups are responsible for regional coordination and governance; and local authorities are responsible for delivering local emergency management in their communities and for participating in the CDEM Group.
2. Enabling equitable outcomes. NEMA is proposing to include a requirement in the Bill for CDEM Groups and their local authorities to consult with disproportionately impacted communities in their regions when preparing the CDEM Group Plan.
3. Roles and responsibilities lead and support agencies. NEMA proposes a new provision in the Bill that enables the making of regulations which establish the roles and responsibilities of (lead and support) agencies with regards to the management of hazards and emergencies.
4. Strengthening Māori participation. NEMA proposes six changes through the Bill to strengthen Māori participation in emergency management including: adding a Te Tiriti / Treaty clause. Māori members on Joint Committees and CEGs and establishing a National Māori Emergency Management Advisory Group.
Monitoring, Alerting and Reporting (MAR) Centre
As part of NEMA’s response to the 2018 TAG Report, work to stand up a 24/7 ‘awake’ capability
to replace the current ‘on call’ Duty System is nearing completion. This capability (the MAR
Centre) will be focussed on gathering and sharing information during the early stages of an
event (including sending National Warning System messages or Emergency Mobile Alerts) or
until the NCC/NCMC is activated.
Service Level Agreements
The Service Level Agreements between the Northland Regional Council and the Far North, Kaipara and Whangārei District Councils are currently being reviewed to ensure alignment with the recently reviewed Northland CDEM Group Plan 2021-2026.
RNZ Kaitaia Mast removal
Northland Civil Defence have been advised that the Radio New Zealand (RNZ) Kaitaia AM transmission mast located at Waipapakauri is at risk of structural failure and is beyond repair. It is required to be removed urgently and is unlikely to be replaced. The Kaitaia site provides AM radio transmissions for the northernmost areas of Northland from 20km north of Kerikeri to the top of Cape Reinga.
Tsunami Information Boards
An annual regional wide check of all the tsunami information boards has been completed. Only one board has had to be replaced.
Northland Lifelines Group
The Northland Lifelines Group met on Friday 13 May 2022. The agenda included presentations on the response to Cyclone Dovi by Northpower and Top Energy and an update on the draft results of the Northland Region Infrastructure Climate Change Assessment by Tonkin and Taylor.
MARITIME
There were 18 Maritime Incidents reported in May. Seven incidents involved abandoned vessels or vessels that were sinking and were removed by Maritime staff. A collision in Whangarei Harbour between a fishing vessel and pleasure craft was also being investigated.
A logging truck that crashed into the Hokianga Harbour had 250 litres of Diesel removed by Maritime staff that prevented a spillage into the Harbour. The truck was then recovered.
The rest of the incidents mainly involved moorings and damaged aids to Navigation.
The ‘Waikare’ was out of the water for 10 days for antifouling. Once the vessel was antifouled and back in the water the Ninepin weather buoy was removed for servicing and maintenance.
12 large navigation signs were refurbished, and new sign panels installed.
The port and harbour safety management systems received their 3 yearly reviews by a panel of experts drawn from other ports and regions, along with a Maritime NZ representative. This is part of the national peer review system that is in place. The results of the review have not yet been received; however, the review did go well with visits to the Bay of Islands and Marsden point.
The Harbourmaster, along with staff Peter Thomas, and Cathy Orevich participated in a national oil spill exercise Whai Manu in Auckland over three days. The exercise was testing systems from a high level of incident control from Wellington, through to a full incident command centre based at the spill in Wellington. These large-scale exercises are only held every few years.
NRC have nine staff on the national response team, probably the highest representation amongst the regions. All costs of staff time are borne by the oil pollution fund.
The navigational safety bylaw review has been progressing but will most likely go on hold Maritime NZ have informed that the related maritime rule part 91 is being reviewed at the same time. Staff will update council at a workshop.
RIVERS AND NATURAL HAZARDS
RIVERS
Awanui |
Favourable Autumn weather conditions and 3 contracts currently in progress (1 completed). Contract 21/05 - Northern Stopbanks. Approx. 70% complete. Satisfactory progress with stopbanks and benching earthworks with minimal issues. Reinstatement of first few sites now complete and prep for over-wintering of remaining sites in hand. Contract 21/09 - Switzer Bench. Earthworks are now 90% complete and rock revetment at rear of Bell’s Produce well underway (25%) and will progress into winter (materials supply & river levels permitting). Contract 21/10 - Rugby Club. Earthworks 80% complete. Rock revetment is phased to continue into winter (materials & river levels permitting) and has the advantage that we have rock storage on hard stand, so less risk from wet weather. Primary School bench now 100% complete and community incredibly happy with reinstatement of Showgrounds areas. FNDC cycle path ties in very nicely with NRC reinstatement. Planting planned for several completed areas and local (Māori-owned) contractors being lined up for this work. |
Otīria/Moerewa |
Stage 1 is nearing completion. Stage 2 Bridge tender is live on GETS closes 23 June |
Kerikeri |
Waipapa Industrial Estate Flood Mitigation is approximate 85% completed. Because of the wet weather we have decided to winterise the site for completion next year. |
NATURAL HAZARDS
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
Whangārei (CBD) River Catchment Flood Model |
75% complete |
Upgrade of the hydraulic model catchment(s) including new structures, updated LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and sea level rise values and recalibration. Specific river/stream structures inspections have been completed over the last month.
Following discussions with WDC (Whangārei District Council), Ewaters (consultants on the project) will now also be engaged to include the CBD stormwater network as part of the same package (variation).
WDC will be funding the additional costs, approximately $90,000, related to the additional tasks. Our aim was to complete the project, including the additional tasks, but has been delayed until the end of 2022 due to resources issues by the consultant.
|
Website Natural Hazards Portal |
91% complete |
Morphum Environmental has been engaged to develop the portal with support and input from colleagues across various departments.
The third phase of the development of the portal is ongoing, e.g., landing page, flooding and Te Ao Māori aspects, story maps, property viewer and sea level rise viewer.
It is our vision to ‘go public’ has been delayed until the beginning August 2022 due to internal GIS (Geographic Information System) resourcing. Prior to that we will be presenting this to our Councillors, and other appropriate platforms, for feedback. Simultaneously it is our intention to share this with our District Council colleagues before going live. |
Raupo Drainage Scheme – Coastal Flood Hazard Analysis & Mitigation Options |
90% complete |
Water Technology (WT) have been engaged to do detailed hydraulic modelling from all perspectives, i.e., catchment, river and most importantly coastal. The objective is to establish a detailed base model and to develop flood hazard mitigation options, particularly from a coastal perspective, and adaptation planning.
The project team consists of NRC and KDC staff, Chair of the Drainage Committee, and Consultants. NRC are taking the modelling analysis lead on this project, i.e., contract management (NRC Budget). KDC are collating the assets data covered under their budgets.
Surveys, data collection, assets inspection and ‘building’ of the hydraulic model have been completed. First draft ‘results’ have been reviewed by the project team. Further analysis and ‘flood event scenarios’ are underway with results expected at the end of April. The project is on target to be completed by the end of June 2022.
This project will support the pilot project under the Te Taitokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy (TTCAS) in which scoping, and planning process is underway; early engagement has commenced with KDC. |
Natural Hazards technical and planning support to District Councils on Plan Changes and Rules |
Ongoing |
Following the publication of our coastal hazard maps and the regionwide flood maps, complimentary to the priority rivers flood maps, further technical, consultative, and planning support / guidance is provided to the DCs. This follows the commitments to DCs prior to the publication of the coastal hazard maps. |
Te Taitokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy (TTCAS): Professional Services Panel
|
Ongoing |
NRC, in collaboration with and on behalf of Kaipara District Council, Whangarei District Council and Far North District Council will be going out for Request(s) for Proposal (RfPs), 6th May 2022, to establish a regional Panel of Professional Services to support the implementation of the TTCAS actions, e.g., district’s pilot projects and beyond. This will provide all four Councils with informed and preselected providers, being able to have shared services, cost, and time effective. Subsequent contracts will be directly with the respective Council as per respective procurement procedures. A total of 42 high quality submissions were received; assessment completion and agreement with preferred respondents has been delayed to the 23rd June 2022 due to the high volume of respondents. The assessment will be conducted by representatives from all four councils. |
CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE
NRC Climate Change Strategy “Ngā Taumata o te Moana” and Implementation Plan
Progress is ongoing. This Strategy touches every aspect of Council business. In undertaking a ‘stocktake’ of current actions, staff are meeting with teams across Council to build relationships, identify current climate-related actions and areas where more could be done. This stocktake will form a baseline for work to set up a monitoring, evaluation, review, and reporting system to track our progress.
Discussions over the past month have traversed Council’s procurement framework, communications and engagement, economics, biodiversity, river and natural hazards forward planning and strategy, EVs, transport planning and emergency management.
Staff have also recently met with Northpower, Northland Inc and attended the Collaboration Te Taitokerau agricultural forum in Waitangi. Staff have also participated in workshops on the Carbon Neutral Government Program and attended the Carbon and Energy Professionals conference in Rotorua. A number of educational opportunities have also been seized including working with EnviroSchools on Te Kete Aronui about climate change as well as a presentation planned for Whangārei Girls High.
Two papers were presented to the most recent Climate Change Working Party meeting, one on climate governance and another on monitoring and reporting. Both papers generated significant discussion. Staff are working on next steps.
There continues to be significant volume of new climate related policy and legislation in development. This is not insignificant and continues to challenge staff’s ability to be proactive and contribute meaningfully consistently. NZ’s first emissions budgets and Emission Reduction Plan were released this month.
Toitū have been engaged to baseline our GHG emissions, certify our accounting and provide advice on where further reductions could occur. Initial kick off meetings will be held in coming weeks.
Te Taitokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy (TTCAS) - Programme Implementation
Joint Strategy now adopted by all four (4) Councils.
See www.catt.org.nz
There are 46 'priority actions' listed in the Joint Strategy. Coordinating and reporting on these actions will happen through the JCCAC (Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee) and CATT (Climate Adaptation Te Taitokerau).
Staff continue to support KDC’s adaptation pilot project at Raupo/Ruawai. Open days are planned for the middle of June – see https://www.kaipara.govt.nz/news/post/350-Ruawai-Flats-Our-Stories-Our-Future
A submission was prepared on behalf of the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee into the draft National Adaptation Plan. This was consulted within each Council’s governance, collectively and submitted to MfE.
NORTHLAND WIDE LIDAR SURVEY
Work Streams |
Status |
Comments |
Regional LiDAR Survey |
In progress |
Payment for final delivery initiated and dataset expected within 1st Quarter. |
8.2.9 KAIPARA MOANA REMEDIATION
KMR continues to accelerate programme delivery, with ongoing progress in key KPIs:
· Growing the pipeline of Sediment Reduction Plans (SRPs), with 35 new Expressions of Interest for SRPs received from landowners since last reporting, covering 5856 Ha and 29kms of fencing
· Good results from the winter 2022 Foundation Planting campaign, with a 320% uplift in contracted planting over the March-May period (from 41,000 to 130,000 stems).
· A further contractor has been accredited to KMR, bringing the total to 22. The contractor affiliates to iwi/hapū in the catchment. Te Uri o Hau Environs is also in the process of accreditation.
· Two further Field Advisor workshops have been developed (17 June, 5-7 July) to upskill current contractors and train new ones, working with Ngā Maunga Whakahii and Te Roroa on the latter.
· Two KMR Kaitiaki Workforce Coordinator roles are shortly to be advertised, as part of KMR’s contribution to the MSD-led Workforce Hub.
· On 14 June, an inaugural workshop to co-design and develop the Workforce Hub was held in Dargaville, with a focus on identifying priorities for the KMR Workforce Development programme.
· Lifting external communications via in-person and online engagement (e.g. via 2 public Zui, KMR Partnership Forum, inaugural Digital Tools Reference Group meeting, regular partner meetings).
· Issue of regular, 6-weekly Pānui, with a reach of over ~1100 people across Auckland and Northland.
· KMR has established social media profiles on Facebook, LinkedIn and Instagram platforms, with a content workplan in development. This work is being undertaken with NRC, as well as others.
Soil Conservation Strategy
A draft project plan is complete and work is starting to establish a project advisory group and commission analysis. Northland Regional Council is undertaking a refreshed soil conservation strategy on similar timeframes, and we are working closely with the NRC team (and Auckland Council Healthy Waters, among others) to align KMR activity and use a shared evidence base.
While we are now scaling up sediment reduction funding, the programme costs and expenditure remain lower than originally budgeted. As in previous years, we will carry over unused budget.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Nil
Council Meeting item: 9.1
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Receipt of Committee Minutes |
From: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 22 June 2022 |
That the unconfirmed minutes of the:
· Te Oneroa-A-Tōhē Board Minutes - 22 April 2022
· Joint Climate Change Adaption Committee 30 May 2022
· Regional Transport Committee 7 June 2022
· Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee 13 June 2022
· Civil Defence Emergency Management Group 14 June 2022
be received.
Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga
Attachment 1: Te Oneroa-A-Tōhē Board 22 April 2022 ⇩
Attachment 2: Joint Climate Change Adaption Committee 30 May 2022 ⇩
Attachment 3: Regional Transport Committee 7 June 2022 ⇩
Attachment 4: Kaipara Moana Remediation Joint Committee 13 June 2022 ⇩
Attachment 5: Civil Defence Emergency Management Group 14 June 2022 ⇩
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings |
From: |
Sally Bowron, Strategy, Governance and Engagement Team Admin/PA |
Authorised by Group Manager/s: |
Auriole Ruka, Pou Manawhakahaere - GM Governance and Engagement, on date 22 June 2022 |
That the report ‘Working Party Updates and Chairpersons' Briefings’ be received.
Climate Change Working Party (Chairperson, Councillor Amy Macdonald)
The Climate Change Working Party met on 25 May 2022. The topics for discussion included:
· Emissions Reduction Work Programme Update (Item 4.3)
· Progress of Ngā Taumata o Te Moana Implementation Plan (item 4.4)
· Tracking Progress on Naā Taumata o Te Moana (item 4.5)
· Climate Change Governance Review (Item 4.6)
Following discussion, the Climate Change Working Party had no actions required
Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party (Chairperson, NRC Councillor Jack Craw)
The Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party met on 25 May 2022. The topics for discussion included:
· A report concerning tangata whenua involvement in PF2050 (Item 4.3)
· Biosecurity Operational Plan (Item 4.4)
· PF2050 Progress Update (Item 4.5)
· Feral Deer (Item 4.6)
· Progress on Road and Rail Plans with Agencies (Item 4.7)
· Kauri Protection and recent Biosecurity and Biodiversity incidents (Item 4.8)
· FIF Dune Lakes programme and herbicide update (Item 4.9)
· Update on Coast Care and dune monitoring programmes (Item 4.10)
· Update on Internal Biodiversity Strategy and Biodiversity Annual Report (Item 4.11)
· Biosecurity Marine Concerns - Alastair Wells (Item 4.12)
Following discussion, the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:
· Biosecurity Operational Plan – Recommendation supported to bring the Draft Northland Regional Pest and Marine Pathway Operational Plan 2022–2023 to council for approval
· PF2050 Progress Update – Recommendation to provide further updates to the working party at the next Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party meeting in August 2022.
· Update on Internal Biodiversity Strategy and Biodiversity Annual Report – Recommendation supported to prepare Councils first Biodiversity Annual Report, highlighting council biodiversity activities and achievements for 2021-2022 financial year
· Biosecurity Marine Concerns – NRC Biosecurity Manager to meet with members and work through the concerns raised and report back at the next working party meeting in August 2022
Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee (Chairperson, Councillor Amy Macdonald)
The Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee met on Monday 30 May 2022. The topics for discussion included:
· Councils Adoption of Joint Climate Adaptation Strategy (Item 6.1)
· Te Ao Māori Decision Making Framework Update (Item 6.2)
· Communications and Engagement Update (Item 6.3)
· National Adaptation Plan Submission (Item 6.4)
· Submission to the National Adaptation Plan (Item 6.5)
Following discussion, the Joint Climate Change Adaptation Committee provided advice on the following next steps:
· Submission to the National Adaptation Plan - The CATT roopū will look to develop methodology on progress of actions in the joint strategy
Council Meeting ITEM: 10.0
28 June 2022
TITLE: |
Whakarāpopototanga / Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to recommend that the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider the confidential matters detailed below for the reasons given.
1. That the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider confidential matters.
2. That the general subject of the matters to be considered whilst the public is excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to this matter, and the specific grounds under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution, are as follows:
Item No. |
Item Issue |
Reasons/Grounds |
10.1 |
Confirmation of confidential minutes - council meeting 24 May 2022 |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting -. |
10.2 |
Human Resources Report - May 2022 |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons s7(2)(a). |
10.3 |
Regional Projects Reserve: Investment proposal for Kaipara Water Scheme |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i). |
10.4 |
Purchase of Whangārei CBD Properties |
The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i). |
3. That the Independent Financial Advisors be permitted to stay during business with the public excluded.
Considerations
1. Options
Not applicable. This is an administrative procedure.
2. Significance and Engagement
This is a procedural matter required by law. Hence when assessed against council policy is deemed to be of low significance.
3. Policy and Legislative Compliance
The report complies with the provisions to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting as detailed in sections 47 and 48 of the Local Government Official Information Act 1987.
4. Other Considerations
Being a purely administrative matter; Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.