Council

Tuesday 23 July 2024 at 10.15am

 

 

AGENDA

 

 


Council Meeting

23 July 2024

Northland Regional Council Agenda

 

Meeting to be held in the Council Chamber

36 Water Street, Whangārei

on Tuesday 23 July 2024, commencing at 10.15am

 

Recommendations contained in the council agenda are NOT council decisions. Please refer to council minutes for resolutions.

 

RĪMITI (Item)                                                                                                                                           Page

1.0      Ngā Mahi Whakapai / Housekeeping

Key Health and Safety points to note:

·        If the fire alarm goes off – exit down the stairwell to the assembly point which is the visitor carpark.

·        Earthquakes – drop, cover and hold

·        Visitors please make sure you have signed in at reception, and that you sign out when you leave. Please wear your name sticker.

·        The toilets are on the opposite side of the stairwell.

 

Please note that the public section of this meeting will be recorded and livestreamed via Youtube to the NRC website.  As a participant in the meeting or a member of the public gallery your presence may be recorded.  By remaining present at the meeting it is understood your consent is given if your image or voice is broadcast. 

Opinions expressed or statements made by individual persons during a meeting are not the opinions or statements of the Northland Regional Council.  Council accepts no liability for any opinions or statements made during a meeting.

2.0      Karakia Timatanga – Tauāki ā roto / Opening karakia

3.0      Ngā WhakapĀhA / apologies

4.0      Ngā Whakapuakanga / DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

5.0      Ngā Whakaae Miniti me te Mahere Mahi / Council Minutes and Action Sheet

5.1      Confirmation of Minutes - 25 June 2024                                                              6

5.2      Receipt of Action Sheet                                                                                          30

6.0      Ngā Take / Decision Making Matters

6.1      Regional Land Transport Plan 2021/2027 - Three Year Review.                  33

6.2      Biosecurity Operational Plan 2024-2025                                                         153

6.3      Approval of Draft Future Development Strategy for public consultation.                                                                                                                                   183

6.4      Council Submissions Lodged under Delegation - retrospective approvals                                                                                                                                   230

6.5      Joint delivery of local government economic development services in Northland: Expansion to include WDC                                                             246

6.6      RMA Hearing Commissioners – Approval and Appointment Procedures                                                                                                                                   292

6.7      Adoption of Te Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy                       301

6.8      Whangarei Public Transport Working Party - Chairperson and Meeting Frequency                                                                                                                337

7.0      Ngā Ripoata Mahi / Operational Reports

7.1      Health and Safety report for April to June 2024 quarter and financial year end                                                                                                                            340

7.2      Chair's Report to Council                                                                                     350

7.3      Chief Executive’s Report to Council                                                                  352

7.4      Quarterly and End of Financial Year People and Culture Report               383

7.5      Legislative Compliance half yearly report January-June 2024                    395

8.0      Receipt of Committee Minutes and Working Party/Group Updates

8.1      Receipt of Committee Minutes                                                                          398

8.2      Working Party Updates                                                                                        417

9.0      Kaupapa ā Roto / Business with the Public Excluded                                          419

9.1      Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - 25 June 2024

9.2      Receipt of Confidential Committee Minutes

9.3      Strategic Projects Update

9.4      Leaseholder's Notice of Exit Stage Two   

 


 

ACC - Accident Compensation Corporation

ALGIM - Association of Local Government Information Management

AMA - Aquaculture Management Area

AMP - Asset Management Plan/Activity Management Plan

AP - Annual Plan

BOI - Bay of Islands

BOPRC - Bay of Plenty Regional Council

CAPEX - Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets)

CBEC - Community, Business and Environment Centre

CCO – Council Controlled Organisation

CCTO – Council Controlled Trading Organisation

CDEM - Civil Defence Emergency Management

CEEF – Chief Executives Environment Forum

CEG - Co-ordinating Executive Group

CEO - Chief Executive Officer

CIMS - Co-ordinated Incident Management System (emergency management structure)

CMA - Coastal Marine Area

CPCA - Community Pest Control Areas

CRI - Crown Research Institute

DHB - District Health Board 

DOC - Department of Conservation

DP – District Plan

E350 – Extension 350 programme

ECA - Environmental Curriculum Award

ECAN - Environment Canterbury

EECA - Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority

EF - Environment Fund

EMA - Employers and Manufacturers Association

EOC - Emergency Operations Centre

EPA - Environmental Protection Authority

ETS - Emissions Trading Scheme

FDE - Farm Dairy Effluent

FNDC - Far North District Council

FNHL - Far North Holdings Limited

FPP - First Past the Post

GE - Genetic Engineering

GIS - Geographic Information System

GMO - Genetically Modified Organism

HBRC - Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Horizons - Brand name of Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council

HR - Human Resources

HSNO - Hazardous Substances & New Organisms Act 

HSWA - Health and Safety at Work Act 2015

IHEMP – Iwi/Hapū Environmental Management Plan

ILGACE - Iwi and Local Government Chief Executives Forum

IPPC - Invited Private Plan Change

IRIS - Integrated Regional Information System

KDC - Kaipara District Council 

KPI - Key Performance Indicator

LAWA – Land, Air, Water Aotearoa

LEA - Local Electoral Act 2001

LGA - Local Government Act 2002

LGNZ - Local Government New Zealand

LGOIMA - Local Government Official Information & Meetings Act 1987

LIDAR – Light detection and ranging

LTI – Long time injury

LTP - Long Term Plan

MBIE – Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment

MFE - Ministry for the Environment

MFL – Māori Freehold Land 

MHWS - Mean High Water Springs

MMH - Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited

MNZ - Maritime New Zealand

MOH - Ministry of Health

MOT - Ministry of Transport

MPI - Ministry for Primary Industries

MSD - Ministry of Social Development

MTAG – Māori Technical Advisory Group (a subgroup of TTMAC)

NCMC - National Crisis Management Centre

NDHB - Northland District Health Board

NEMA – National Emergency Management Agency

NES - National Environmental Standards

NFT – Northland | Forward Together

NGO - Non-Governmental Organisation

NIF - Northland Intersectoral Forum

NINC - Northland Inc. Limited

NIWA - National Institute of Water and Atmosphere

NORTEG - Northland Technical Advisory Group

NPS - National Policy Statement

NPS-FM - National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

NZCPS - New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement

NZTA – Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency

NZTE - New Zealand Trade and Enterprise

NZWWA - New Zealand Water and Wastes Association

OFI - Opportunity for Improvement

OPEX – Operating Expenditures

OSH - Occupational Safety & Health

OTS – Office of Treaty Settlements

PCBU - Person Conducting Business or Undertaking

PGF – Provincial Growth Fund

PPE - Personal Protective Equipment

RAP - Response Action Plan

RBI - Regional Broadband Initiative

RFI - Request for Information

RFP - Request for Proposal

RLTP - Regional Land Transport Plan

RMA - Resource Management Act 1991

RMG - Resource Managers Group (Regional Councils)

RMZ - Riparian Management Zone

ROI - Return on Investment

RP – Regional Plan

RPMP - Regional Pest Management Plan

RPMS - Regional Pest Management Strategy

RPS - Regional Policy Statement

RPTP – Regional Public Transport Plan

RRSAP – Regional Road Safety Action Plan

RSG – Regional Sector Group

RSHL - Regional Software Holdings Ltd

RTC - Regional Transport Committee

RTO - Regional Tourism Organisation

SIG – Special Interest Group

SIPO - Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives

SITREP - Situation Report

SOE - State of Environment (or) State Owned Enterprise

SOI – Statement of Intent

STV - Single Transferable Vote

TAG - Technical Advisory Group

TKoT  - Te Kahu o Taonui

Tier 1 - Site level plan or response for an oil spill

Tier 2 - Regional level plan or response to an oil spill

Tier 3 - National level plan or response to an oil spill

TLA - Territorial Local Authority – City & District Councils

TON – Top of the North (regions)

TTMAC – Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party

TTNEAP – Tai Tokerau Northland Economic Action Plan

TMP - Treasury Management Plan

TOR - Terms of Reference

TPK - Te Puni Kōkiri (Ministry of Māori Development)

TWWAG – Tangata Whenua Water Advisory Group

UNISA - Upper North Island Strategic Alliance

WDC - Whangarei District Council

WRC - Waikato Regional Council

WSMP - Workplace Safety Management Practices

 

 

 

 



Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 5.1

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Confirmation of Minutes - 25 June 2024

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist

Authorised by:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 08 July 2024

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the minutes of the council meeting held on 25 June 2024, be confirmed as a true and correct record and that these be duly authenticated with the Chair’s electronic signature.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Unconfirmed council minutes - 25 June 2024  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 5.1

23 July 2024Attachment 1























 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 5.2

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Receipt of Action Sheet

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist

Authorised by:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 15 July 2024

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

The purpose of this report is to enable the meeting to receive the current action sheet.

 

Nga mahi tutohutia / Recommendation

That the action sheet be received.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Council Action Sheet - July 2024  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 5.2

23 July 2024Attachment 1


 

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.1

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Regional Land Transport Plan 2021/2027 - Three Year Review.

From:

Chris Powell, Transport Manager - Northland Transportation Alliance and Michael Payne, Policy Specialist

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Louisa Gritt, Group Manager - Community Resilience, on 12 July 2024

 

Whakarāpopototanga | Executive Summary

This report seeks the Northland Regional Council’s approval of the Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027 – Three Year Review compiled by the Regional Transport Committee in accordance with the requirements of the Land Transport Management Act 2003.

The report further requests that the Northland Regional Council approve the submission of the Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027 – Three Year Review (RLTP) to New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi no later than 1 August 2024.

Ngā mahi tūtohutia | Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Regional Land Transport Plan 2021/2027 - Three Year Review.’ by Chris Powell, Transport Manager - Northland Transportation Alliance and Michael Payne, Policy Specialist and dated 19 June 2024, be received.

2.         That the council approve the Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027 – Three Year Review compiled by the Regional Transport Committee.

3.         That the council approve the submission of the Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027 – Three Year Review to New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi by no later than 1 August 2024.

Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

That the council approve the RLTP and approve the submission of the RLTP to the NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi by 1 August 2024.

The RLTP is submitted to NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi within the prescribed time period and thereby ensuring that the Northland Regional Council, Far North District Council, Whangarei District Council, Kaipara District Council, NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi, Waitangi Trust and the Department of Conservation applications for transport-related funding assistance through the National Land Transport Fund are received by NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi by the prescribed date of 1 August 2024 and are thereby eligible for government funding.

None.

2

That the council does not approve the RLTP and does not approve the submission of the RLTP to the NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi by 1 August 2024.

None.

Failure to submit the RLTP by 1 August 2024 could potentially adversely impact on the ability of the Northland Regional Council, Far North District Council, Whangarei District Council, Kaipara District Council, Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency, Waitangi Trust and the Department of Conservation to obtain funding assistance through the National Land Transport Fund. (Further detail is provided in section 4 of this report).

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.

Considerations

1.        Climate Impact

Section 14(c) of the Land Transport Management Act 2003 stipulates the environmental requirements that must be taken into account in the preparation of an RLTP.  The importance of environmental impacts is further covered by the Government Policy Statement on Transport 2024.  All the proposed actions to address the region’s transport priorities as reflected in the RLTP are measured against national outcomes.

2.        Environmental Impact

Section 14(c) of the Land Transport Management Act 2003 stipulates the environmental requirements that must be taken into account in the preparation of an RLTP.  The importance of environmental impacts is further covered by the Government Policy Statement on Transport 2024.  All the proposed actions to address the region’s transport priorities as reflected in the RLTP are measured against national outcomes.

3.        Community views

Community views have been sought as detailed under Sections 18 and 18A of the Land Transport Management Act 2003.  Extensive advertising and promotion of the RLTP was undertaken through the press, radio, email, mail and various electronic mediums.

During February and March 2024, the following public consultation was undertaken on the Draft RLTP: -

a)   Drop-in Have Your Say Events

i.    Monday 19 February 2024          Whangārei

ii.   Monday 19 February 2024          Dargaville

iii.  Tuesday 20 February 2024          Mangawhai

iv.  Monday 11 March 2024               Opononi

v.   Monday 11 March 2024               Kaikohe

vi.  Tuesday 12 March 2024               Kaitaia

vii. Tuesday 12 March 2024               Kerikeri

b)   Online Have Your Say Events

i.    Tuesday 5 March 2024

ii.   Friday 15 March 2024 – Hybrid (online & in-person)

A total of 77 persons attended the above and 131 written submissions were received.

The deliberations on the submissions received (written and verbal) were held on Friday 24 May 2024.

Additional Consultation Required

In mid-May 2024, NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) advised that changes in government priorities and funding resulted in them having to amend some of the State Highway safety proposals reflected in the draft RLTP that was consulted on.

Changes to two projects triggered the threshold for ‘significant change’ (more than $7M per project) and resulted in a limited consultation being implemented.

The submission period ran from Wednesday 15 May 2024 to Wednesday 29 May 2024.

A total of six submissions were received with deliberations being held on 11 June 2024.

4.        Māori impact statement

No specific Māori impacts were identified through the public consultation process.

5.        Financial implications

The financial implications identified relate to the Council not approving the submission of the RLTP to NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi by 1 August 2024.

Failure to submit the RLTP by 1 August 2024 means the Council will miss the statutory cut-off date for funding under the National Land Transport Fund. Potential implications of this are that government funding of all transport funding in Northland, to support road maintenance, local road and State Highway construction and public transport may not be available. This could have significant impact on the ability of Northland Regional Council, Far North District Council, Whangārei District Council, Kaipara District Council, NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi, Waitangi Trust and the Department of Conservation to carry out essential transport projects in the 2024-2027 period. 

In the absence of NLTF funding these projects will likely need to be entirely funded by the Council or agency proposing the works if they progress at all.  In the case of NRC and the region’s TAs, Long Term Plans have been developed with the assumption that government subsidies will be available for transport projects.

6.        Implementation issues

The only implementation issue identified is that if the NRC does not approve the submission of the Regional Land Transport Plan 2021/2027 – Three Year Review to NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi by 1 August 2024 the designated submission date will not be met. This could potentially adversely impact on the receipt of national funding assistance to the Far North District Council, Whangarei District Council, Kaipara District Council, Northland Regional Council and NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi.

7.        Significance and engagement

In relation to sections 13 to 18H of the Land Transport Management Act 2003 which details the Significance and Engagement requirements relating to the compilation of an RLTP, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against the councils Significance and Engagement Policy because the RLTP has already been consulted on. This decision concerns its submission to NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi by 1 August 2024. This is provided for in the councils Long Term Plan and is part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.


 

8.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The policies, risk management and legislative compliance relating to the compilation of an RLTP are stipulated in the Land Transport Management Act 2003 were met.

Tuhinga | Background

The Regional Land Transport Plan 2021-2027 is essentially a six-year ‘Programme of Works’ through which the Northland Regional Council, Far North District Council, Whangarei District Council, Kaipara District Council, NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi, Waitangi Trust and the Department of Conservation bid for funding assistance from the National Land Transport Fund.

Whilst the RLTP is a six-year plan, the government releases its Government Policy Statement on Land Transport (GPS) every three years.  This results in RLTPs having to be reviewed every three years to ensure they align with the relevant GPS.  Therefore, all reference to the RLTP in this paper is to the three-year review of the approved six-year plan implemented in July 2021.

 

Statutory requirement

The RLTP – Three Year Review has been compiled in accordance with the requirements of the Land Transport Management Act 2003.

Land Transport Management Act 2003

Contained in the Land Transport Management Act (LTMA) are the following sections, which are relevant to the compilation and content of a Regional Land Transport Plan.

Section 13 states that:

Every six financial years, each regional council, in the case of every region except (Auckland), must—

a)  ensure that the relevant regional transport committee prepares, on the regional council's behalf, a regional land transport plan; and

b) approve the regional land transport plan by a date appointed by the Agency.

In addition to the above, Section 18c states that: -

1)  A regional transport committee must complete a review of the regional land transport plan during the 6-month period immediately before the expiry of the third year of the plan.

This RLTP has been developed by the Regional Transport Committee in partnership with Northland’s three district councils and the NZTA. 

It reflects their collective land transport related problems, strategic objectives and funding requirements for the 2024-2027 funding period and provides an indication of significant state highway improvement projects for the following three financial years.

As the region’s transport related Strategic Objectives and Regional Priorities aligned with the government’s objectives as reflected in the GPS 2024, the Regional Transport Committee approved that the RLTP be “Reviewed” and that a “Complete Rewrite” was not warranted.

 

Submission of Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027 – Three Year Review

Section 18B of the LTMA further stipulates that: -

1)  A regional transport committee that has prepared a regional land transport plan on behalf of a regional council must, after it has consulted under sections 18 and 18A, lodge the regional land transport plan with the regional council.

This report therefore serves to formally request-

Ÿ That the ‘Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027 – Three Year Review’ is acknowledged as being lodged with the Northland Regional Council by the Regional Transport Committee; and

Ÿ That the Northland Regional Council approve the submission of the ‘Regional Land Transport Plan for Northland 2021-2027 – Three Year Review’ to the NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi no later than 1 August 2024.

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Regional Land Transport Plan 2021/2027 - Three Year Review  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.1

23 July 2024Attachment 1


















































































































 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.2

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Biosecurity Operational Plan 2024-2025

From:

Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity, on 16 July 2024

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The attached draft Biosecurity Operational Plan 2024-2025 (hereafter referred to as the Operational Plan) has been prepared as a requirement of the Biosecurity Act 1993 section 100B and should be read in conjunction with the Northland Regional Pest and Marine Pathway Management Plan 2017–2027 (hereafter referred to as the Pest Plan).  It includes all species listed in the Pest Plan and describes how biosecurity programmes will be implemented during the 2024/2025 financial year. The biosecurity operational plan was supported by the Biosecurity & Biodiversity working party at a meeting held in March 2024 and recommended for adoption at a future full council meeting.

Recommendations:

1.         That the report ‘Biosecurity Operational Plan 2024-2025’ by Don McKenzie, Pou Tiaki Pūtaiao - GM Biosecurity and dated 16 July 2024, be received.

2.         That council approve the Operational Plan in accordance with the Biosecurity Act section 100B.

3.         That council authorises the GM Biosecurity to make any necessary minor drafting, typographical, rounding, or presentation corrections to the Operational Plan.

 

Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Council approves the whole Operational Plan.

Implementation of the rules and activities can proceed under the revised Operational Plan.

Nil

2

Council may request amendments on the grounds that the Operational Plan is inconsistent with the Pest Plan

Improved consistency with the Pest Plan is achieved.

The process for their confirmation by council will cause delays in implementation.

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1.

Considerations

1.    Climate Impact

This decision will have no foreseeable impact on the ability of council to respond to the impacts of climate change within the following year.

 

 

2.    Environmental Impact

This decision will have beneficial effects on the environment by reducing pest impact over the coming year.

3.    Community views

Community views have been sought through the development of the Pest Plan and respective Long-Term Plans and Annual Plans.  Based on community feedback the Pest Plan and annual budgets have been set which this Biosecurity Operational Plan now implements.

4.    Māori impact statement

In respect of tangata whenua feedback, input has been sought through the development of the Pest Plan and respective Long-Term Plans and Annual Plans.  Based on this feedback the Pest Plan and annual budgets have been set which this Biosecurity Operational Plan now implements.  In addition, tāngata whenua members of the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council sit on the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party and have had an opportunity to provide feedback and input into this Operational Plan.

5.    Financial implications

Budget for implementation is allocated as part of the current Long-Term Plan and Annual Plan.  Regular review of the Operational Plan will be undertaken as additional and any external funding allocations are confirmed.

6.    Implementation issues

There are no barriers to implementation of the current plan at this stage.

 

7.    Significance and engagement

In relation to Section 100B of the Biosecurity Act 1993 this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against the council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because the pest plan has previously been consulted on.  This decision concerns its implementation and is provided for in council’s Long-Term Plan and is part of council’s day to day activities.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tāngata whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

8.    Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The Operational Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Biosecurity Act 1993, section 100B and is consistent with the Pest Plan.

Background/Tuhinga

The Northland Operational Plan aims to be a concise and accurate reflection of the content of the Pest Plan.  Reviews of the Operational Plan can be undertaken during the year to align with any changes in external funding that may arise.

Section 100B of the Biosecurity Act states that the Operational Plan will be completed within three months of the end of the financial year.  The Plan is now presented for council approval within that timeframe and having been considered and endorsed by the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party in March of this year.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: 2024-2025 Biosecurity Operational Plan  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.2

23 July 2024Attachment 1



























 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.3

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Approval of Draft Future Development Strategy for public consultation.

From:

Ingrid Kuindersma, Policy Planner and Michael Payne, Policy Specialist

Authorised by:

Jason Donaghy, Natural Resources Monitoring Manager, on 17 July 2024

 

Whakarāpopototanga | Executive Summary

The National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (NPS-UD) requires Tier 2 councils such as Whangarei District Council (WDC) to prepare a Future Development Strategy (FDS) to outline how they are planning for growth over the next 30 years.  NRC is required to jointly prepare and sign the FDS along with WDC.

A technical working group was formed to guide the drafting of the FDS with NRC nominating Councillors Geoff Crawford and Amy McDonald along with Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) members Mira Norris and Ripeka Read.  This group has been meeting on a regular basis since September last year to shape the draft FDS.  Input has also been sought from a wide range of stakeholder groups including central government agencies, private industry, and local hapū.

Based on the working group deliberations and inputs from stakeholders, the draft document has reached a stage where it is ready to be tested with the public to seek their feedback.  The technical background reports would also be made available.  The intention is to open the consultation for four weeks beginning early August.  During this time there will a range of public engagement events for community groups and iwi/hapū.

In accordance with the approved working group Terms of Reference, following the submission period, there will be a hearing process to allow submitters to speak to their submissions.  The working group will consider the feedback received before summarising submissions and presenting recommendations to both councils to make decisions on finalising the FDS.

Approval is now being sought from both NRC and WDC councillors to proceed with notification of the draft document and technical reports (Refer Attachment 1).

Ngā mahi tūtohutia | Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Approval of Draft Future Development Strategy for public consultation.’ by Ingrid Kuindersma, Policy Planner and Michael Payne, Policy Specialist and dated 1 July 2024, be received.

2.         That the draft Future Development Strategy document be approved for public consultation.

3.         That council delegates to the Group Manager – Environmental Services the authority to make any necessary minor formatting, typographical and administrative changes to the draft FDS and supporting information prior to formal public consultation.

 

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Approve the release of the FDS draft for public consultation.

The FDS document will be available for public feedback and submission which is a key step in finalising the document.  Extensive consultation with the technical working group and a range of other stakeholders has been undertaken in preparing the draft and the public now need the opportunity to have their say.

None

2

Not approve the release of the draft FDS.

None

NRC and WDC will not be able to progress with finalising the FDS which is a statutory requirement under the NPS-UD

The staff’s recommended option is 1.

Considerations

1.        Climate Impact

The implementation of the FDS will have implications with regard to climate change and these are considered in the draft report, however, release of the draft for public consultation is an administrative matter with no direct effects on climate change considerations.

2.        Environmental Impact

The implementation of the FDS will have a range of environmental outcomes which have been assessed throughout the draft report.  However, the release of the draft document will not have environmental effects in itself and will provide the opportunity for the public to identify any additional risks or benefits they perceive.

3.        Community views

A range of community views have been sought in the preparation of the draft.  Approving the draft for release will allow the whole community to provide input via the submissions process.

4.        Māori impact statement

The proposals in the draft FDS document were developed with input from iwi and hapū through a series of evening hui, input from TTMAC and Te Kārearea representatives on the working group and a separate group that prepared the hapū aspiration statement. The implementation of the FDS, including the Hapū Aspiration Statement will have a range of outcomes affecting the environment and Māori. Further consideration of impacts on Māori will be addressed through the deliberations process and subsequent council decisions but the release of the draft report itself will have no direct impact on Māori.

5.        Financial implications

There are no known financial implications of this decision other than the ongoing time costs of staff and TTMAC representatives which have been budgeted.

6.        Implementation issues

Approval to notify the draft FDS for consultation is also required from WDC councillors and will be on their agenda for the 25 July meeting.

 

 

7.        Significance and engagement

The decisions addressed in this agenda item are in themselves considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s current Significance and Engagement Policy, because they are for the purpose of achieving compliance with the requirements of the NPS-UD and do not, in themselves, impact the community other than to provide them with information.

8.        Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

Notification of the draft FDS is consistent with the legislative requirements for preparing the strategy in accordance with the NPS-UD.

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Draft Whangarei Future Development Strategy  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.3

23 July 2024Attachment 1












































 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.4

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Council Submissions Lodged under Delegation - retrospective approvals

From:

Michael Payne, Policy Specialist and Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist

Authorised by:

Jason Donaghy, Natural Resources Monitoring Manager, on 17 July 2024

 

Whakarāpopototanga | Executive Summary

Two submissions on central government proposals have been lodged under delegation by the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) on behalf of council over the last month – both proposals are Bills to amend the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA).  These are outlined below.

Resource Management (Freshwater and Other Matters) Amendment Bill

This Bill was open for submissions from 5 June until 30 June 2024.  The Bill proposes changes to exclude the Te Mana o Te Wai hierarchy from consenting, aligning consent pathways for coal mining with those applied to other mineral extraction activities, extending timeframes for identifying significant natural areas (SNA), repeal of intensive winter grazing standards and simplifying the process used to develop / change national direction.  The council submission was lodged on 27 June following approval by ELT – the submission is attached (Attachment 1).

Resource Management (Extended Duration of Coastal Permits for Marine Farms) Amendment Bill

This Bill was introduced in Parliament on 1 June 2024. If passed, the Bill will extend the current duration of all coastal permits authorising aquaculture activities by 20 years, but not beyond 2050. The extension would cover all of the RMA consents (coastal permits) needed for a marine farm to operate. Submissions on the Bill closed 16 June 2024.  A submission on the proposal was lodged on 14 June 2024 under delegated authority by ELT (refer Attachment 2).

Delegations were used as the submission timeframes either did not allow for approval at a formal meeting or would not provide staff adequate time to develop the submission.  In accordance with the Delegation Manual, draft submissions on both Bills were circulated to councillors for discussion and comments prior to being sent to ELT for approval and lodged with the relevant select committee.

Council’s Delegations Manual requires that submissions authorised by the Executive Leadership Team that are deemed to be politically significant must be retrospectively approved by council. Retrospective approval is being sought by council for that reason.  This report recommends council give retrospective approval for the submissions attached as Attachment 1 and Attachment 2.

Ngā mahi tūtohutia | Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Council Submissions Lodged under Delegation - retrospective approvals’ by Michael Payne, Policy Specialist and Justin Murfitt, Strategic Policy Specialist and dated 1 July 2024, be received.

2.         That Council retrospectively approve the attached submission on the Resource Management (Freshwater and Other Matters) Amendment Bill.

3.         That Council retrospectively approve the attached submission on the Resource Management (Extended Duration of Coastal Permits for Marine Farms) Amendment Bill.


 

Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Council retrospectively approves the submissions

The Select Committees overseeing the Bills will be able to take into account council’s submissions.

None

2

Council does not approve the submissions

None.

The submission points would need to be formally withdrawn. Select committees would not be able to consider the council submission points.

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1

Considerations

1.        Climate Impact

Although the outcome of the Bills could affect New Zealand’s ability to address climate impacts, the matter subject to this report is of an administrative nature and does not warrant any specific considerations in respect of climate change.

 

2.        Environmental Impact

Although the outcome of the Bills could affect New Zealand’s ability to address environmental effects, the matter subject to this report is of an administrative nature and does not warrant any specific considerations in respect of climate change.

 

3.        Community views

Council’s submissions are intended to advocate for the interests of the region. The Bills were open to public submission and therefore individuals in the community have also had the opportunity of raise matters relating to their own interest.

 

4.        Māori impact statement

Although the outcome of the Bills could have impacts on Māori, the matter subject to this report is of an administrative nature.

 

5.        Financial implications

There are no known financial implications associated with this decision.

 

6.        Implementation issues

There are no known implementation issues associated with decision.

 

7.        Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s significance and engagement policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities.  This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to Tangata Whenua and/or individual communities, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

8.    Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

There are no material policy or legislative compliance risks associated with council lodging submissions on the Bills or relating to council’s retrospective approval of the submission.

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: NRC submission Resource Management (Freshwater and other matters) Amendment Bill

Attachment 2: NRC Submission on Resource Management (Extended Duration of Coastal Permits for Marine Farms) Amendment Bill  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.4

23 July 2024Attachment 1








 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.4

23 July 2024Attachment 2





 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.5

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Joint delivery of local government economic development services in Northland: Expansion to include WDC

From:

Darryl Jones, Economist and Avinash Govind, Economic Policy Advisor

Authorised by:

Bruce Howse, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, on 17 July 2024

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The purpose of this report is to seek council approval on a set of recommendations that arise from the decision by Whangarei District Council (WDC) at its meeting on 16 July 2024 to adopt it’s Long Term Plan 2024-2034 which included the decision to become a shareholder of Northland Inc Limited (Northland Inc) and provide funding into the Investment and Growth Reserve (IGR). These recommendations include the sale to WDC of ten (10) of the 40 Northland Inc shares held by Northland Regional Council (NRC), agreement to a revised Shareholders’ Agreement and terms of reference for the Joint Regional Economic Development Committee (JREDC) that incorporates WDC ownership and membership respectively, and minor amendments to the criteria and procedures for the allocation of funding from the IGR.

 

If all three current shareholder councils approve the sale of shares, Northland Inc will move from being a council-controlled organisation (CCO) jointly and equally controlled by NRC, Far North District Council (FNDC), and Kaipara District Council (KDC), to being a CCO jointly and equally controlled by NRC, FNDC, KDC, and WDC. Each of those four councils will own thirty shares in Northland Inc; currently, NRC, KDC, and FNDC each own forty shares in Northland Inc.

 

At its meeting on 18 April 2024, JREDC agreed that these recommendations be put to their respective councils for decision.  All three current shareholders of Northland Inc will be making similar decisions, except for the amendments to the IGR criteria which is a decision for NRC only. WDC will be making decisions to purchase shares from the three councils and agree to the Shareholders’ Agreement and the Terms of Reference for the JREDC, as well as deciding their membership on the JREDC. 

 

Staff recommend that council approve the suite of recommendations. Doing so will transition the primary delivery mechanism for local government economic development services in Northland (Northland Inc) to full ownership by all four Northland local authorities, enlarges the governance body (JREDC) so that it has membership from all four councils, and increases the level of funding that is available for economic development activities in Northland.

 

Recommendations:

1.         That the report ‘Joint delivery of local government economic development services in Northland: Expansion to include WDC’ by Darryl Jones, Economist and Avinash Govind, Economic Policy Advisor and dated 19 June 2024, be received.

2.         That council sells 10 shares in Northland Inc Limited to Whangarei District Council at a price of $2 per share and authorises the Chief Executive Officer to sign the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement (Attachment One) and Share Transfer Form (Attachment Two) to execute the sale.

3.         That council authorises Chair Geoff Crawford to sign the revised Northland Inc Limited Shareholder Agreement (Attachment Three).

4.         That council adopts the updated Terms of Reference for the Joint Regional Economic Development Committee (Attachment Four).

5.         That council agrees to the revised Criteria and procedures for the allocation of funding from the Investment and Growth Reserve (Attachment Five).

 

Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Agree to the set of decisions that move to the joint delivery model for local government economic development services with WDC, including the sale of shares in Northland Inc to WDC, the expansion of membership in the JREDC, and a revised criteria for the allocation of funding from the IGR

Completes the process of WDC joining the JREDC and becoming a shareholder in Northland Inc.

Provides additional funding into the IGR, allowing for a greater level of enabling investment across the region.

Enables JREDC to serve as a demonstration of regional unity, on economic development issues, to stakeholders inside and outside the region.

Enables a greater level of regional coordination in conversations with central government and private firms about investment and development opportunities.

Enhances Northland Inc’s ability to advocate for the region and secure funding for economic development projects.

Council dilutes its shareholding of Northland Inc, decreasing its level of influence over the CCO’s operations and board composition.

Increases the operational complexity of the JREDC.

2

Do not agree to the set of decisions to move to the joint delivery model for local government economic development services with WDC. 

Enables NRC to maintain its level of control over Northland Inc and its board.

Doesn’t increase the complexity of the JREDC.

Limits the capacity of Northland Inc to advocate for our region, when talking to central government and businesses.

Likely to decrease the operational funding available to Northland Inc, hindering its ability to support small businesses, given the JREDC’s desire to increase the size of the IGR.

Negatively affects Northland’s ability to secure funding from the Regional Infrastructure Fund (RIF), given the government’s stated desire to see a high level of regional coordination around the fund.

Indicates a lack of regional unity and coordination on economic development priorities, which could limit Northland’s access to central government funding, beyond the RIF.

Could damage NRC’s relationship with the other three local authorities given their support for WDC’s decision to become a shareholder.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1: approve the set of recommendations which extend the joint service delivery model for local government economic development services in Northland to include WDC alongside NRC. KDC and FNDC. This joint delivery model includes joint and equal ownership of Northland Inc by the four local authorities, membership of all four councils on the JREDC, and additional funding into the IGR to support regional economic development activities. Extending the delivery model to include WDC will also enhance Northland Inc’s ability to advocate for investment and development in the region in conversations with central government and private firms. The JREDC is fully supportive of these changes. Preventing WDC from joining the JREDC and becoming a shareholder in Northland Inc could severely damage the NRC’s relationship with the other stakeholders involved in the process. Beyond this, external stakeholders, such as central government, would likely view our decision negatively, given their public support for region economic coordination.

Considerations

1.    Climate Impact

There are no climate impacts associated with this decision.

2.    Environmental Impact

There are no environmental risks or impacts associated with this decision.

3.    Community views

WDC have consulted on becoming a shareholder in Northland Inc and providing funding to the IGR as part of their LTP 2024-2034 consultation process. While responses both in favour and against the proposal were received, WDC agreed in their deliberation to participate in the joint ownership of Northland Inc. The three current shareholders did not need to consult on this matter because they already had an ownership interest in Northland Inc. Central government has stressed the importance of regional coordination and unity on economic development matters and recognise Northland Inc and JREDC as key parties for regional economic development.

4.    Māori impact statement

There are no known particular impacts on Māori that are different from general community views that need to be considered. 

5.    Financial implications

As part of their deliberation decision, WDC agreed to provide an annual funding contribution into the IGR for the first two years of LTP 2024-2034: $475,000 in 2024/25 and $587,000 in 2025/26. This will be on top of the annual funding contribution made by NRC, KDC and FNDC, and represents a 19% increase in 2024/25 and 23% in 2025/26.

6.    Implementation issues

There are two main implementation issues. As the sale and purchase of the shares cannot occur on 1 July because WDC does not adopt its Long Term Plan 2024-2034 until 16 July 2024, there will be some minor financial management issues that will need appropriately accounted for. These can be managed without impacting the move to joint ownership. Staff will need to coordinate the sale and purchase of the shares on the same day so that WDC is able to move to a 25% shareholding all at once. The exact day on which this occurs will be determined in due course once

Second, and more importantly, there will be a need to support the WDC review of their involvement in Northland Inc so they are able to make an informed decision regarding their funding commitment beyond 2025/26. This may require actions by both council and Northland Inc staff and governance. This issue is complicated by the need to complete the review in time for the outcome to be incorporated into WDC’s 2026/27 annual plan process and the local body elections in October 2025.

7.    Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is not considered to be of high significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it can be considered part of council’s day to day activities. This does not mean that this matter is not of significance to tangata whenua and/or individual communities, but that the council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

 

8.    Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

These decisions comply with council’s policy and legislative requirements. Legal advice has been sought in the preparation of the documents to ensure compliance with legislative requirements. 

Background/Tuhinga

On 1 July 2021, KDC and FNDC become joint and equal shareholders of Northland Inc alongside NRC. This was accomplished by NRC selling 40 shares to both KDC and FNDC. The decision by FNDC and KDC to become shareholders of Northland Inc followed public consultation by the two councils as part of their respective Long Term Plan (LTP) 2021-2031 consultation process. Becoming a shareholder in a council-controlled organisation requires consultation under section 56(1) of the Local Government Act (LGA) 2020. This move to joint ownership of Northland Inc was recommended by a LGA 2020 section 17A review of local government economic development service delivery in Northland undertaken in 2017 (which was jointly funded by all four councils) and a proposal agreed to by the Northland Mayoral Forum in early 2020.

While WDC decided in 2020 to not consult on becoming a shareholder in Northland Inc, it did consult on this matter as part of its LTP 2024-2034 consultation process. At its deliberation meeting on 29 May 2024, WDC agreed to become a shareholder of Northland Inc, noting the importance of having a strong regional body to drive better economic outcomes for the Whangarei district. WDC also agreed to commit total investment funding of $475,000 in 2024/25 and $587,000 in 2025/26, and to review the benefits of their involvement in Northland Inc before committing further funding beyond 2025/26. The committed funding will go into the IGR, being the common fund into which the three current shareholders place their funding commitments to regional economic development as set out in their respective LTPs.

Sale of shares

Each of the three current council shareholders own 40 shares in Northland Inc, i.e. one-third of the total 120 shares. In the original (current) shareholders’ agreement each of the three shareholder councils committed to selling ten (10) of their 40 shares to WDC if WDC decided to become a shareholder. These transactions will result in joint and equal ownership of Northland Inc by the four councils, i.e. 30 shares each, one-quarter of the total 120 shares. Each of the current shareholders will sell the shares to WDC at a price of $2 per share, being the price originally paid by the councils for the shares. This process for moving to joint and equal ownership with WDC was agreed to by the JREDC at its meeting on 18 April 2024.

The process of selling these shares will be facilitated by staff from all four councils and overseen by the lawyers who provided the required documents for the execution of the sale. The documents include a common Share Sale and Purchase Agreement signed by all four councils as parties to the agreement (Attachment One) and a Share Transfer Form between NRC and WDC (Attachment Two). These documents set out the terms under which the share sale and transfer will be made. Arrangements will be made for these transactions to happen on the same day once the last of the four councils involved have agreed to the necessary decisions.

Shareholders’ Agreement

As part of the move to joint ownership, a Shareholders’ Agreement was prepared and signed by Northland Inc and each of the three current shareholders on 1 July 2021. The Shareholders’ Agreement sets out the terms between the parties in relation to the management and ownership of Northland Inc, its activities, and the rights and obligations of the shareholders. Among other things, the Shareholders’ Agreement sets out the rights attached to shares, the appointment of directors, the procedures for board meetings, matters requiring joint committee approval, the issue of new securities and share transfer restrictions.

A number of changes to the Shareholders’ Agreement are proposed in light of WDC becoming a shareholder. A few other minor changes are proposed to tidy the document. These changes have been prepared by NRC appointed lawyers acting on behalf of current shareholders, with review by WDC legal representatives. At its meeting on 18 April 2024, the JREDC agreed that these changes be provided to the three current shareholder councils for their agreement.

The changes made as a result of WDC becoming a shareholder include listing WDC as a specific party to the agreement, adding a clause 1.3 to terminate the previous agreement, and revising clause 11 to set out the process for any shareholder to exit ownership. A new clause 17 has been added to outline the funding commitments expected of shareholders and the process for resolving disputes regarding funding. The other changes relate to deleting unused definitions, clarification on a quorum of shareholders (clause 6.2) to ensure consistency with quorum requirements for the Joint Committee Regional Economic Development Committee, adding in a minimum monetary value for long term contracts requiring Joint Committee approval, and modifying references to the Constitution of Northland Inc as no changes to this are being proposed.

The new Shareholder’s Agreement requires signature by all parties, i.e. Northland Inc and the four shareholder councils. The new agreement will be dated with the same date as the share transactions occur.

Joint Committee Terms of Reference

As part of the suite of decisions made in 2021 to move to joint ownership of Northland Inc, a Joint Regional Economic Development Committee (JREDC) was established. The main reason for establishing the JREDC was to give it all the responsibilities, duties and powers of a local authority as a shareholder in a CCO under the Local Government Act (LGA) 2002 so that these could be enacted by one joint committee decision rather than three separate council decisions. JREDC was also given responsibility for the allocation of funding from the IGR. The IGR is the common pool into which the shareholder councils place their funding commitment to regional economic development as set out in their respective Long Term Plans.

Three changes are proposed to the JREDC terms of reference. First, changes are made to incorporate WDC as member, allowing it to appoint two elected as full members of the joint committee and one as an alternate in the event that either of the two nominees are unable to attend. This brings the total number of members to eight, two from each shareholder council.

Second, provision is made for a change in membership of JREDC if any of the member councils ceases to be a shareholder of Northland Inc. This has been inserted to allow for the smooth transition in operation of JREDC should WDC decide to no longer be a shareholder in Northland Inc following the two-year review that WDC have specifically included in their LTP 2024-2034 deliberation decision.  Finally, with the passage of time, the requirement that the inaugural Chair be an elected member of NRC is removed.

At its meeting on 18 April 2024, the JREDC agreed that these changes be provided to the three current shareholder councils for their agreement.

The formation of joint committees is provided for in the Local Government Act 2002 (Schedule 7, Clauses 30 and 30A). Clause 30A(1) states that a local authority does not appoint a joint committee under clause 30(1)(b) unless it has first reached agreement with every other local authority or public body that is to appoint members of the committee. Under Clause 30A(2), an agreement under subclause 30A(1) must also specify—

a.    the number of members each local authority or public body may appoint to the committee; and

b.    how the chairperson and deputy chairperson of the committee are to be appointed; and

c.    the terms of reference of the committee; and

d.    what responsibilities (if any) are to be delegated to the committee by each local authority or public body; and how the agreement may be varied.

e.    how the agreement may be varied.

The Terms of Reference (TOR) document for the Joint Regional Economic Development Committee (Attachment Four) address the requirements above and by each council resolving to adopt the terms of reference the requirements of Clause 30A(1) are considered to be met.

IGR criteria

The final document that requires council agreement is the criteria and procedures for the allocation of funding from council’s IGR (Attachment Five). The criteria were last revised at the council meeting on 22 June 2021 as part of the suite of decisions associated with the move to joint ownership of Northland Inc with FNDC and KDC. The major change at that time was that responsibility for the allocation of funding was moved from council to the JREDC. The current version of the criteria is available on council’s website: https://www.nrc.govt.nz/your-council/economic-development/investment-and-growth-reserve/.

Two changes are being proposed: to specifically identify WDC as a shareholder of Northland Inc and to remove the word “grant” from before the word “funding” in relation to the Enabling Investment category of funding (clause 10). This change is proposed to broaden the type of funding that can be allocated through this category. It is currently limited to grant funding only. By removing the word grant, the scope of possible investment types is extended to include loans and equity investment, while at the same time allowing for grant funding allocations if this is considered the most suitable.

At its meeting on 18 April 2024, the JREDC agreed to recommend to NRC that these two changes be made.

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Share Sale and Purchase Agreement (to be signed by all four councils)

Attachment 2: Share Transfer Form - NRC to WDC

Attachment 3: Northland Inc Shareholders' Agreement (July 2024 version to include WDC)

Attachment 4: Joint Regional Economic Development Committee Terms of Reference (July 2024 version to include WDC)

Attachment 5: Criteria and procedures for the allocation of funding from the Investment and Growth Reserve - Version 6  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.5

23 July 2024Attachment 1







 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.5

23 July 2024Attachment 2

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.5

23 July 2024Attachment 3

























 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.5

23 July 2024Attachment 4



 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.5

23 July 2024Attachment 5



 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.6

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

RMA Hearing Commissioners – Approval and Appointment Procedures

From:

Colin Dall, Pou Whakaritenga - Group Manager Regulatory Services

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Colin Dall, Pou Whakaritenga - Group Manager Regulatory Services, on 09 July 2024

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

The Audit, Risk and Finance Committee resolved at its 29 May 2024 meeting that it recommends to council that it:

i.     Approves an initial list of RMA hearing commissioners and any subsequent applications by commissioners to be added to the list that delegated staff then use to arrange and appoint commissioners for consent hearings.

ii.    Retains approval to appoint commissioners (informed by staff recommendations) to hear and make recommendations on non-freshwater plan changes.

iii.   Retains its power to make nominations to the Chief Freshwater Commissioner for appointment to the freshwater hearings panel for the council’s freshwater plan/plan changes.

The council’s Consents Manager has compiled the attached list Resource Management Act (RMA) certified hearing commissioners for its consideration and approval.  The list includes certified RMA hearing commissioners that the council has used for resource consent hearings in recent years, together with those used by Far North, Kaipara and Whangarei District Councils for joint hearings that they have been involved in with the council.  It also includes the council’s three currently certified RMA hearing commissioners – councillors Amy Macdonald, Geoff Crawford and Tui Shortland. 

 

No changes were recommended to the existing procedure for approving and appointing commissioners to hear and make recommendations on non-freshwater plan changes, or to make nominations to the Chief Freshwater Commissioner for appointment to the freshwater hearings panel for the council’s freshwater plan/plan changes.

 

Recommendations:

1.         That the report ‘RMA Hearing Commissioners – Approval and Appointment Procedures by Colin Dall, Pou Whakaritenga - Group Manager Regulatory Services and dated 6 July 2024, be received.

2.         That council approves the attached list of RMA hearing commissioners that delegated staff then use to arrange and appoint commissioners for consent hearings.

3.         That staff report to the council on any subsequent applications by commissioners to be added to the list for its consideration and approval.

 


 

Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Status quo – delegated staff arrange and appoint RMA hearing commissioners for consent hearings and make recommendations to the council for appointment of commissioners to hear and make recommendations on non-freshwater plan changes.

Quick and very efficient.  Avoids the need to go back to the council or a committee for approval of new/replacement commissioners if an approved commissioner pulls out prior to a hearing.

Council has little oversight of commissioner options for consent hearings.

2

Council:

 

 

 

·  Approves an initial list of RMA hearing commissioners that staff then use to arrange and appoint commissioners for consent hearings.

·  Considers and approves subsequent applications (reported on by staff) made by commissioners to be added to the list.

·  Retains approval to appoint commissioners (informed by staff recommendations) to hear and make recommendations on non-freshwater plan changes.

·  Retains its power to make nominations to the Chief Freshwater Commissioner for appointment to the freshwater hearings panel for the council’s freshwater plan/plan changes.

Quick and efficient once the initial list has been approved.

Council is involved in the process (commissioner options).

The approved list of commissioners could be published on council’s website together with the process for other commissioners to be added to the list.

Requires more administration.


 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

3A

Council:

 

 

 

·  Establishes a committee to appoint RMA hearing commissioners for consent hearings to make recommendations to council.

·  Retains approval to appoint commissioners (based on staff recommendations) to hear and make recommendations on non-freshwater plan changes.

·  Retains its power to make nominations to the Chief Freshwater Commissioner for appointment to the freshwater hearings panel for the council’s freshwater plan/plan changes.

Council is involved in the process of appointing hearing commissioners for consent hearings via its representatives on the committee.

Less efficient and requires more administration.

Potential delays in hearing commissioner appointment if committee members are not available/cannot be contacted or, if the appointment process can be done by e-mail, do not respond promptly to
e-mails.

3B

Council establishes a committee to appoint RMA hearing commissioners for consent hearings and non-freshwater plan changes, and to make nominations to the Chief Freshwater Commissioner for appointment to the freshwater hearings panel for the council’s freshwater plan/plan changes.

Same as Option 3A.

Same as Option 3A.  Only councillors on the committee are involved in the process of appointing commissioners for non-freshwater plan changes, and to make nominations to the Chief Freshwater Commissioner for appointment to the freshwater hearings panel for the council’s freshwater plan/plan changes.

 

The Audit, Risk and Finance Committee’s recommended option is Option 2 as a good balance between governance oversight and enabling an efficient and effective process for appointment of hearing commissioners.  It is noted that the Committee also passed a resolution seeking further advice from staff on guidelines for the appointment process and this will be considered at the Committee’s August meeting with subsequent recommendations to the council.

 

 

Considerations

Being a purely administrative matter, Climate and Environmental impacts, Community Views, the Māori Impact statement and Financial implications are not applicable.

1.    Implementation issues

All options can be implemented with varying degrees of efficiency and governance oversight.  These are summarised in the options assessment above.

2.    Significance and engagement

In relation to section 79 of the Local Government Act 2002, this decision is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy because it is part of council’s day to day activities and is only to give effect to an administrative function. Council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking consultation or engagement with the community.

3.    Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

All options presented are legislatively compliant.  The subsequent process of implementing the option will need to ensure the appointment of RMA hearing commissioners complies with the legislative requirements and any material conflicts of interest must be avoided to prevent potential challenge (judicial review proceedings) of the decisions they make.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Most regional councils have delegated the power to appoint RMA hearing commissioners to hear and determine consent applications that require a hearing to the relevant senior managers of their council.  Some of those councils also use a list of council approved commissioners.  A few councils use a committee or have not delegated the power to either a committee or staff.

 

Currently the power to appoint RMA hearing commissioners in our council is delegated to the Chief Executive Officer and Group Manager Regulatory Services.  They also have the associated power to delegate all relevant functions, powers and duties to a hearing commissioner, as does the Group Manager Environmental Services for non-freshwater plan hearings.  These delegations have been in place since late 2016.

 

The standard steps and factors in appointing hearing commissioners for consent hearings are:

 

Steps and Factors

Responsible Officer

Check if the consent applicant or a submitter has requested the council to use independent hearings commissioners.  If so, only commissioners who are not members of the local authority can be appointed to hear and determine a consent application.

Consents Manager

Determine the issues that have been raised in submissions.

Consents Manager

Determine whether a single commissioner would be sufficient to hold hearing based on issues that have been raised and the number of submitters wishing to be heard, or if more than one commissioner would be appropriate.  The latter is likely when there are many submitters and a wide range of issues raised.

Consents Manager

If complex technical issues are raised, then would need to identify a commissioner that has knowledge/experience regarding those issues.  If Māori cultural issues have also been raised, then would need to assess if an additional commissioner with knowledge/experience in Māori cultural issues is required.  If it is determined that only a single commissioner is required, then the commissioner should have significant experience in RMA planning matters and our regional plan framework.  Where more than one commissioner is required then one of commissioners must be appointed to chair the commissioner panel and hold a current chair certification.

Consents Manager (may be discussed with Group Manager Regulatory Services)

If the consent application is within the rohe of a hapū or iwi that has signed a Mana Whakahono ā Rohe, then the requirements of that agreement regarding consent hearings and Māori commissioners need to be followed.

Consents Manager

Once potential commissioners have been identified, their availability is ascertained, and any conflicts of interest are identified that would eliminate them from being engaged.  The consent applicant also needs to be contacted to determine hearing dates.  This can become an iterative process when there is more than one commissioner required and/or the consent applicant is relying on multiple people to give evidence/support their application at the hearing.  After these processes have been completed, approval of the commissioner(s) and the delegation of all relevant functions, powers and duties is sought from Group Manager Regulatory Services or Chief Executive Officer if the former is on leave or has a conflict of interest in relation to the consent application or a hearing commissioner.

Consents Manager

Approval of the commissioner(s) and the delegation of all relevant functions, powers and duties required by them.

Group Manager Regulatory Services or Chief Executive Officer

 

Other factors may also apply if the required hearing is a “Joint Hearing” with a District Council, particularly if only a single commissioner is required, and the District Council plan is the primary consideration for the application.  In these scenarios, it is likely that the District Council will also be lead agency and would be administering the hearing process for both councils.

 

Council has in the past used a committee with delegated powers to approve and appoint RMA hearing commissioners (this was called the “Hearing Committee”).  This committee was made up of two councillors and relied heavily on staff recommendations on hearing commissioners because of the steps and factors (preliminary work) outlined above.  Current staff that were involved in undertaking the preliminary work and recommending hearing commissioners to the committee cannot recall the committee declining any of their recommendations.  Delays were also experienced at times when one or both of committee members were not available to approve and appoint hearing commissioners.  These were key reasons why council decided that a committee was not an efficient way to approve appoint RMA commissioners to hear and determine consent applications and subsequently delegated that power to the Group Manager Regulatory Services and Chief Executive Officer.

 

An alternative option to provide greater involvement of council in the process is to get it to approve an initial list of RMA hearing commissioners and any subsequent applications by commissioners to be added to the list that delegated staff then use to arrange and appoint commissioners for consent hearings.  Currently, staff use a list of preferred RMA hearing commissioners that have knowledge/expertise in matters that are often pertinent to consent applications that are determined by the council.  This could be provided to the council for its review and added to prior to council approving the list.  A council approved process for approving additional commissioners at short notice would also be prudent if specific technical expertise is desirable to determine a consent application which none of the commissioners on the current list of approved commissioners holds.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: List of Approved RMA Hearing Commissioners  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.6

23 July 2024Attachment 1



 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.7

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Adoption of Te Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy

From:

Kyla Carlier, Corporate Strategy Manager

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 02 July 2024

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report presents Te Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy for adoption.  The strategy was developed by a cross-council working group comprising staff representatives from Far North District Council, Kaipara District Council, Northland Regional Council (NRC) and Whangarei District Council. 

 

The strategy sets out the intention and direction to make our region more accessible and responsive to residents and visitors with access needs. It is a high-level document that provides guidance across all councils, to be underpinned by implementation plans developed by each individual council.

 

Recommendations:

1.         That the report ‘Adoption of Te Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy’ by Kyla Carlier, Corporate Strategy Manager and dated 18 April 2024, be received.

2.         That Council formally adopt the Te Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy, a joint approach to accessibility developed by the Far North, Kaipara, Whangarei, and Northland Regional Councils.

3.         That council direct staff to develop an implementation plan specific to Northland Regional Council, that maps out actions within the strategy framework.

 

Options

 

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Formally adopt the Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy and direct staff to develop an implementation plan.

The strategy will move toward being fully adopted as a regional strategy by all councils, setting out the vision and key goals for accessibility in Northland; an NRC-specific plan will be developed to guide implementation of the strategy for council.

Staff resource will need to be allocated to the development of the implementation plan.

2

Formally adopt the Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy; do not direct staff to develop an implementation plan.

The strategy will move toward being fully adopted as a regional strategy by all councils, setting out the vision and key goals for accessibility in Northland;

No staff resource will need to be allocated to the development of an implementation plan. 

No implementation plan will be developed, meaning that the approach to accessibility across council will remain ad-hoc. 

3

Do not formally adopt the Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy; do not direct staff to develop an implementation plan.

No staff resource will need to be allocated to the development of an implementation plan.

The strategy will not be adopted by all councils, and will be prevented from being released as a formal strategy; the approach to accessibility across council will remain ad-hoc; reputational risk would be introduced.

 

The staff’s recommended option is Option 1 – to adopt the strategy and direct development of an implementation plan.

Considerations

1.    Climate Impact

There will be little impact on the climate as a result of this adoption; any actions resulting from the implementation plan will be assessed for climate impact on an individual basis.

2.    Environmental Impact

There will be little impact on the environment as a result of this adoption; any actions resulting from the implementation plan will be assessed for environmental impact on an individual basis.

3.    Community views

The process of developing this strategy has included a lengthy and detailed engagement process. The cross-council working group that developed the strategy was supported by a community working group comprising people with access needs from across Te Tai Tokerau. 

4.    Māori impact statement

The 2013 disability survey carried out by statistics NZ showed that Māori and Pacific people had higher-than-average disability rates, after adjusting for differences in ethnic population age profiles. The consideration of tāngata whaikaha has been central to development of the Te Tai Tokerau Accessibility Strategy, and the community working group included Tāngata Whaikaha.

Development of the vision and values was carried out with respectful guidance from NRCs Kaiārahi Tikanga Māori.

5.    Financial implications

Budget for implementation of the strategy was considered by council during the early stages of its development, and was allocated in the Long Term Plan 2021-2031. The budget approved was $25,000 in 2023/24 and 2024/25, increasing to $90,000 in 2025/26 and $100,000 every year following, and capital spend of $95,000 in 2023/24 for development and implementation of a regional accessibility strategy.  The implementation plan will be managed within this budget, and therefore there are no further financial implications for council to consider.

 

6.    Implementation issues

The adoption of this strategy will be followed by the development of implementation plans relevant to each of the participating councils. These plans will set out future actions and priorities, with any additional funding requirements presented to council for individual consideration and approval.

 

7.    Significance and engagement

Section 76AA of the LGA directs that council must adopt a policy setting out how significance will be determined, and the level of engagement that will be triggered. While the development and adoption of the Regional Accessibility Strategy for Northland did not trigger council’s Significance and Engagement Policy, the strategy was developed in close consultation with the access-needs community, and is a great example of community involvement and collaboration.

8.    Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

While there is no specific legislative requirement to develop an accessibility strategy, local government is required to promote the social, economic, environmental, and cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future. This includes the disability community and other communities with access needs.

The accessibility strategy is influenced by multiple documents, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the New Zealand Disability Strategy 2016-2026, Whāia Te Ao Mārama 2018-2022:  The Māori Disability Action Plan, The Human Rights Act 1993, and Te Tiriti of Waitangi.

The action plans resulting from this strategy are likely to have impacts on council’s policies over time, as these policies are continuously improved.  

As the strategy is implemented it is anticipated that council’s risk profile will improve in terms of physical risk and reputation.

 

Background/Tuhinga

In May 2019, the Northland Chief Executives’ Forum proposed the development of a region-wide accessibility strategy for Te Taitokerau. 

Te Taitokerau has the second highest rate of disabilities nationwide at 29% of the population. The purpose of the strategy is to enable people with access-needs to live, work, play, visit and participate in our communities, in a more inclusive and equitable way. This mahi was subsequently reframed as Te Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy.

A cross-council working group, comprising staff representatives from the Whangārei, Far North, and Kaipara District Councils, and Northland Regional Council, have developed a high-level plan, or strategy, for the region. This plan will guide the development of action or implementation plans at individual council level, providing for consistency and the enabling efficiencies in service delivery to be realised.

The development of the strategy comprised an extensive and detailed process of engagement with representatives of the access-needs community, providing valuable feedback and insights.

The cross-council working group was supported by a community working group comprising people with access-needs from across the region, including whānau hauā/tāngata whaikaha. This group with support from a facilitator and Kaiārahi Tikanga Māori, developed the vision, values, guiding principles and focus areas for the core framework. The working group relied upon these guiding principles to develop the key goals, outcomes and actions of the strategy.

This development phase has now been completed and the Strategy has been designed for presentation back to the community. The designed document is screen reader friendly for those who use text to speech software, and summary documents are available in a range of alternate formats including:

•          New Zealand Sign Language video (deaf community)

•          Large Print, Braille and audio (blind low vision community)

•          Easy Read (learning/intellectual disabilities, and others with low literacy)

•          Te Reo Māori

 

The Chief Executive Forum received the final report on the strategy on 8 April 2024.  The Whangarei District Council adopted the strategy on 27 June at their formal meeting.

Each individual council will develop their own implementation or action plan based on the Strategy.  Council has already begun work that will be tied into these implementation plans, including carrying out an accessibility audit of all public-facing council buildings, and an accessibility audit of council’s website, and work to remediate issues identified on a priority basis.  

Other initial actions will likely include educating and empowering staff to adapt current work practices, staff training, and future planning to enable better inclusive and accessible outcomes for the region. Where there are joint actions, the working group will work to identify these and pull together the required staff and resources to support the actions.

 This mahi is supported by budget approved in the 2021 long term plan.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Te Tai Tokerau Regional Accessibility Strategy  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 6.7

23 July 2024Attachment 1
































 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 6.8

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Whangarei Public Transport Working Party - Chairperson and Meeting Frequency

From:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist

Authorised by:

Louisa Gritt, Group Manager - Community Resilience, on 04 July 2024

 

Executive summary/Whakarāpopototanga

This report proposes that the Whangarei Public Transport Working Party (WPTWP) reduce its meeting frequency from six to three times a year.  It also proposes that Councillor Jack Craw be replaced by Councillor Rick Stolwerk as the Chairperson of the WPTWP.

 

It is important to note that at the last meeting of the WPTWP these proposed changes were agreed to.  Therefore, if council approves the changes they will be implemented without delay.

 

Recommendations

1.         That the report ‘Whangarei Public Transport Working Party - Chairperson and Meeting Frequency’ by Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist and dated 2 July 2024, be received.

2.         That, Councillor Jack Craw be replaced by Councillor Rick Stolwerk, as the Chairperson of the Whangarei Public Transport Working Party (WPTWP).

3.         That the meeting frequency of the WPTWP be reduced from six to three times a year.

4.         That a submission be lodged with the Remuneration Authority to reflect the subsequent changes in remuneration arrangements for elected members (to give effect to recommendations 2 and 3).

Options

No.

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

1

Approve the changes to the Chairperson and meeting frequency of the WPTWP.

·   Meeting frequency better aligns with the workload of the working party.

·   Spreads workload across elected members.

·     None apparent.

2

Do not approve the changes to the Chairperson and meeting frequency of the WPTWP.

·    None apparent.

·     Meeting frequency is out of balance with the workload of the working party.

·     Workload is not well distributed between elected members.

 

This staff recommendation is Option 1.

Considerations

Being an administrative matter, climate impact, environmental impact, community views, Māori impact statement are not directly applicable.

1.    Financial implications

If the proposed changes are approved by council, then a submission will be lodged to the Remuneration Authority to reflect the new distribution of remuneration amongst members.  This will be actioned in conjunction with the changes approved at the June council meeting to appoint a new Chair of the Infrastructure Committee and a new Chair of the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party. [1]

The current remuneration (as gazetted in the Local Government Members (2024/25) Determination 2024) is as follows:

Regional Council Chairperson                                                                                                    138,846

Regional Council Deputy Chairperson                                                                                     87,685

Chair of Regional Transport Committee and Infrastructure Committee                        75,759

Chair of Whangārei Public Transport Working Party                                                           74,515

Chair of Audit, Risk and Finance Committee                                                                          73,892

Councillor with no additional responsibilities (x4)                                                               72,648

Councillor (minimum allowable remuneration)                                                                    55,697

 

Based on the methodology approved by council at the 14 February 2024 extraordinary council meeting as follows:

 

The submission to the Remuneration outlining the revised remuneration will be as follows:

 

Regional Council Chairperson                                                                                                    138,846

Regional Council Deputy Chairperson                                                                                     87,205.7

Chair of Regional Transport Committee                                                                                 74,505.7

Chair of Infrastructure Committee                                                                                           73,905.7

Chair of Audit Risk and Finance Committee                                                                           73,905.7

Chair of Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party                                                           73,905.7

Chair of Whangarei Public Transport Working Party                                                           73,605.7

Councillor with no additional responsibilities (x2)                                                               72,705.7

Councillor (minimum allowable remuneration                                                                      55, 697

 

2.    Implementation issues

As above, a revised proposal will need to be submitted to the Remuneration Authority. 

 

3.    Significance and engagement

This is an administrative matter and is considered to be of low significance when assessed against council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  This does not mean that the matter is not of significance to the community, but that council is able to make decisions relating to this matter without undertaking further consultation or engagement.

4.    Policy, risk management and legislative compliance

The matters addressed within this report comply with council’s Standing Orders. 

Content specifically relating to councillor remuneration gives effect to Schedule 7(6) of the Local Government Act 2002 which states that the Remuneration Authority must determine the remuneration, allowances and expenses payable to Chairpersons, Deputy Chairpersons and members of local authorities.

 

Background/Tuhinga

No further information to include.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

 


 

TITLE:

Health and Safety report for April to June 2024 quarter and financial year end

From:

Tamsin Sutherland, Health and Safety Advisor

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 12 July 2024

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

This report is to inform the council of the activity in Health and Safety for the period April to June 2024, and summary information for the financial year.

 

An overview/summary of the report includes: 

 

·          A summary of the events, investigations and outcomes that have occurred in this period.

·          Overall numbers of incidents/hazards (excluding speeding) continue to be improved. Speeding events continue to trend down.

·          Update on health and safety audit 2024.

·          The annual stress survey was completed and reflect a lower reported experience of stress for staff, recommendations from this report have been referred to the Executive Leadership team, the Health and Safety Committee and the Wellbeing Group.

 

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Health and Safety report for April to June 2024 quarter and financial year end’ by Tamsin Sutherland, Health and Safety Specialist and dated 9 July 2024, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

1.        Health and safety performance

A summary of the health and safety performance for the year to date including the period July 2023 to June 2024 is shown in Table 1 below. 

·   To provide a more systematic approach to health and safety continuous improvement, a Health and Safety strategy was developed with assistance from external consultants. This was provided to the Executive Leadership Team in February 2024.

 

·   Staff engagement continues to be at the core of the continuous improvement programme for health and safety.  Key staff and Health and Safety Representatives are included in focus groups for the improvement programme.  The elections for Health and Safety Representatives and the Health and Safety Committee will run in July 2024, as this is required every 3 years.

 

·   Whilst the number of completed health and safety (H&S) inductions to the building for new staff in the April – June 2024 quarter remains below the target of 100% within 2 working days, the failures to meet the target relate to onboarding of casual or part time staff employed to work in the field who do not work in the office in a regular pattern.

 

·   Training for the final quarter included H&S investigation training for H&S Reps, Kayak skills, trailer skills, fatigue at work, Traffic Inspector, contractor management, H&S for managers, first aid for field staff and working with aggressive dogs.

 

·   The move to QR code incident reporting has had a positive impact on the incident reports.  Reporting ‘near misses’ is a valuable learning opportunity. In 2022-2023 there were 17 near misses reported.  In 2023-24 there were 112 near miss reports, see Table 2 below for comparison.  This represents a significant change towards a proactive mindset in health and safety for staff.

 

·   ‘Working with contractors’ has been identified as a priority focus area for health and safety in previous audits and in the H&S Strategy.  A training programme has run for contract managers this year, 85 staff have completed this course.  Document management has become more standardised and auditing of contracts in progress is now routinely conducted at risk based frequencies.

 

·   A snapshot external audit of the health and safety maturity was conducted in May 2024.  The reporting from this has been delayed, it is anticipated this will be presented to the Audit, Risk and Finance Committee in August 2024.

 

·   The Executive Leadership Team (ELT) have adopted new Lead Indicators for the coming year, to show a commitment to proactive steps in health and safety, as well as continuing to report on lag indicators.

 

2.        Risk management

The review of the risk register was a significant piece of work to improve understanding of hazard and risk, engaging managers and H&S Representatives from all Teams.  The previous register had several duplicate entries, information on risks held under several relevant entries.  The replacement Hazard Register is reformatted to remove any repetition, it groups risks into fewer categories to make it simpler to use and removes any inconsistencies in the way risk scoring has been applied. The sign off level for different tasks is risk based and included in the hazard register.

Critical risks have been identified for prioritised management.  A critical risk is defined as “A risk likely to result in serious personal injury, illness or a fatality. Often less frequent exposure, but very severe consequences.” The critical risks have been adopted by members of ELT.

A programme of ‘deep dive’ visits with the critical risk owner and a health and safety Rep/Advisor has begun.  These visits provide an opportunity for ELT to gain insights into the risks faced by staff, and demonstrate ELT engagement in health and safety.

Essential training has been identified for different roles, and guidance clarified on whether staff can work under supervision of other competent staff to carry out this work.


A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

Table 1: Health and safety performance lead and lag indicators July 2023 to June 2024

 

Note – Where 100% building induction of new staff is not achieved within 2 working days, this relates to casual staff or part time staff who are less available within 2 working days.

 

Financial Year

Number of incident reports

Near miss reports

2020-2021

132

22

2021-2022

149

17

2022-2023

225

17

2023-2024

351

112

 Table 2: Comparison of incident reports for past 4 years, showing increasing trend in reporting of incidents and near misses – note total number of incidents includes near miss reports. Also see figure 4 below

Definitions used:                   Accident         unsafe event results in injury or property damage (no obvious cause)

                                                     Incident          unsafe event results in injury or property damage (obvious cause)

                                                     Near miss      unsafe event that doesn’t result in harm

                                                     Hazard           new things that can cause harm at work


 

The top cause for reported incidents for the April to June quarter is vehicle incidents, including near misses (18 incidents, 65 incidents in full year).  Staff have been encouraged to report driving incidents where they have to take evasive action, so that NRC has a better picture of the frequency of these incidents.

 

Speeding fell to second place (9 incidents this quarter) reflecting the improved speed management initiative.  There has been a steady decline in the number of speeding incidents since the initiative was introduced in March 2023.

 

Aggressive person incidents were the third most frequent incidents in this quarter and this year (8 incidents, 49 incidents in full year).  Staff have again been encouraged to report aggressive behaviour, rather than accepting abuse or threats as a ‘normal’ part of work.  It is not possible to determine whether this increase (16 incidents in 2022-23 to 49 incidents 2023-24) is due to improved reporting, more aggression in the community, or a combination of these factors.

 

 

A graph of a bar chart

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Figure 1: Health and safety event reports categorised by type for the April to June 2024 quarter – note vehicle incidents include near misses whilst driving

 

In this quarter, there have been several serious incidents with aggressive people making veiled or open threats with weapons to staff.  These incidents have been referred to the Police as they arise. 

 

The Regulatory Services Group are trialling the use of body cameras at the time of this report.  The cameras have a viewing screen that shows in real time, the aim is to show the person how they appear, and to act as a deterrent to aggressive behaviour. There is also the ability to record behaviour if it is necessary to pass information to the Police.  Many other local councils are also trialling body cameras as this does appear to be a widespread pattern of escalation in threats to Council staff.

 

A graph with numbers and a bar chart

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Figure 2: Health and safety event reports categorised by type for the April to June 2024 quarter and for the full financial year

3.        Injuries, incidents, and hazards

79 events were reported by staff for the quarter April to June 2024. Additionally, 7 speeding events were identified in ERoad for this period, and two speeding tickets.  NRC vehicles travel in excess of 100,000kms each month. The number of incidents recorded represents an average of 1 speeding event per 54,741 kms driven this quarter (compared to 1 event per 28,033 kms driver for the financial year), reflecting a positive change in driver behaviour through the year.

Figure 3 below shows injury/incident related events, as compared to hazard related events, for the previous 12 months. 

The simplified reporting system rolled out part way through October 2023 is reflected in a spike in reporting in November as people reported incidents they had not previously reported.  This peak has not been maintained, however, the reporting trend is significantly up on previous years. This reflects a more proactive culture in reporting near miss incidents.

In 2022 and 2023 financial years there were 17 near misses reported.  In 2023-24 there were 112 near miss reports, see Figure 4 below. Near misses are a valuable learning opportunity, to identify changes that can be made before an accident occurs.  The improved reporting of near misses is a very positive step. 

An audit of the hazardous substances storage by the Health and Safety Advisor identified some improvements to be made in separation of different types of substance, and in creating one location for bulk storage of hazardous materials.  The layout of Union East Street yard has been changed to allow the inclusion of a designated flammables shed and to create the necessary separation distances.  The flammables shed has been delivered and will provide adequate storage for all bulk flammables used at Whangarei sites. The location compliance certificate will be applied for shortly.

 

A graph of a blue line

Description automatically generated

Figure 3: Number of hazard and injury/incident related events for the previous 12 months

In past years, reporting of injuries has been reliable, but the reporting of hazards or near misses has been limited.  There has been a significant drive to stress the importance of the learning that can come from investigation why near misses occur.

Fostering a culture of reporting incidents and near misses has included:

·    simplifying reporting

·    providing better feedback to staff on changes made as a result of their incident reports

·    cultivating a growth mindset about learning from incidents, as opposed to ‘blaming’ those who report an incident

This has resulted in a significant improvement of reporting of near miss and hazard information, evident in Figure 4 below.  It is estimated that for every serious injury, there are hundreds of near miss opportunities to learn. This is better reflected in the 2023-2024 year data.

A graph of injury events

Description automatically generated

Figure 4: Trend of hazard vs injury related event reports over time

Events of interest

Note: the events of interest only detail high risk events, or events which affect large groups of people.

The following events are events of interest from the quarter April 2024 to June 2024.

·    Aggressive people causing stress through abusive and persistent phone calls and during site visits. Some high level threats made against staff - referred to the Police as criminal matters.

·    Vehicle incidents remain consistently high.  This includes small vehicle dings, and improved reporting of evasive action taken to avoid other drivers or animals in the road.

·    The increased reporting of near misses is a valuable learning opportunity for continuous improvement.

·    Improved segregation of hazardous substances has been adopted at the Whangarei locations and a Location Compliance Certificate will be sought shortly to consolidate the chemical storage at the Union East Street location.

4.    Health and safety strategy work programme

A health and safety maturity audit was undertaken in May 2024.  The report is not available at the time of writing.  The audit also included a review of contractor management.

 

The health and safety training requirements did not track effectively into Enterprise.  This database has been recreated in consultation with managers to clarify work where training is legally required, work that can be conducted under the supervision of another competent member of staff, and where training is a recommendation only.

 

In October 2023 a fixed term Health and Safety Advisor was appointed to support the Health and Safety function at council.  This role has now been made permanent.  The effective doubling of the resource for health and safety has created a shift from working almost exclusively in a reactive way as issues arose, to allowing health and safety to plan and implement a proactive plan of continuous improvement.

 

5.        Stress survey 2024

The annual stress survey was completed after Easter 2024. The three main stressors identified in the stress survey remain Workload, Technology and Personal Life.  Personal life appeared to be more of a stressor than in previous years, likely reflecting the financial pressures on staff in 2024. 

The level of stress reported by staff was improved on last year, with no one identifying themselves at the highest level of stress (compared to 3% of respondents in 2023).  87% of staff believed they had a good work life balance (up from 69% in 2023).

Identified positives of working at Council included flexi plus, flexible working, Christmas leave, the team/organisation culture and core values of the organisation.

 

Improvements arising from the survey include:

·    promoting reporting of incivility by colleagues (demeaning treatment)

·    ensuring staff know how to report stress and what support is available

·    redefining the critical risk of ‘fatigue’ to a broader risk of ‘psychosocial harm’ (including fatigue, work design, decision making and stress) to align with WorkSafe guidance

·    using Aotahi and Teams channels to improve communication with staff

·    keeping the 9-day fortnight (flexi plus) scheme

 

6.        Legislative changes

From 1 July 2024 Maritime NZ has become the primary regulator for the Health and Safety at Work Act in major ports and on ships.  The Harbourmaster’s Office are aware of the implications of this change, which will affect Northport in Northland and all work on ships.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

 

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.2

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Chair's Report to Council

From:

Rae Hetaraka, Executive Assistant to the Chair

Authorised by:

Geoff Crawford, Chairperson of council, on 17 July 2024

 

Purpose of Report

This report is to receive information from the Chair on strategic issues, meetings/events attended, and correspondence sent for the month of June 2024.

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Chair's Report to Council’ by Rae Hetaraka, Executive Assistant to the Chair and dated 8 July 2024, be received.

 

 

Meetings/events attended

During this period, I attended the following meetings/events/functions:

·        5 June – Met with MP Grant McCallum on Flood Protection/Flooding in Dargaville

·        5-6 June – Attended Change Management Course – Auckland

·        7 June - Attended opening of the Pouto Wharf

·        12–13 June – Attended Field Days in Hamilton

·        14 June – Attended meeting in Auckland hosted by Auckland Council

·        19 June – Attended a Chamber of Commerce evening

·        20 June – Met with Hon Simeon Brown to discuss the closure of the Brynderwyns

·        21 June – View Commercial Forest Harvest Practises in Northland

·        26 June – Visited Omakiwi Cove – Russell

Correspondence

During June I sent out the following correspondence:

Date

Addressed To

Subject

24 June 2024

Hon Tama Potaka

Invitation to visit Taitokerau

25 June 2024

Hon Andrew Hoggard

Support to continue the eradication of Caulerpa

27 June 2024

Hon David Seymour

Signed :

Mayor of Whangarei

Mayor of Far North

Mayor of Kaipara

Chair of Northland Regional Council

Northland Tertiary Education

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

 

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.3

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Chief Executive’s Report to Council

From:

Jonathan Gibbard, Tāhūhū Rangapū  - Chief Executive Officer

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Jonathan Gibbard, Tāhūhū Rangapū  - Chief Executive Officer, on 17 July 2024

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Chief Executive’s Report to Council’ by Jonathan Gibbard, Tāhūhū Rangapū  - Chief Executive Officer and dated 26 June 2024, be received.

 

7.3.1   Highlights

Wild Animal Control

Operations for the sika eradication project began in late April, and since then 39 sika deer have been removed from both public and private lands in the Russell and Ngaiotonga areas. The team have been using a combination of helicopter thermal imaging and ground crews with drones. The use of a helicopter and high-quality thermal detection has proved very effective in finding deer under tall forest and tight manuka shrublands.  In addition, the deer are still mobbed up after the roar making them more vulnerable in terms of detection and eradication.

 

Once DNA and other samples are taken staff have been distributing deer meat back into the community through farm owners and the marae at Te Rawhiti, Waikare and Ngaiotonga.

 

A group of people standing around a table

Description automatically generated

Pictured above is the council’s Biosecurity Project Lead - Feral Deer, manning the barbeque and council’s Kaiwhakahaere Honongā Māori, who has tamariki at the school.  Local pest control kaitiaki from Waikare also joined the school’s Matariki event. 

 

7.3.2   Corporate Services

 

PROPERTY

Hon Judith Collins as Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology will be opening the new facility that council built for NIWA at 9.30am, Tuesday 13 August 2024. Council leases the building and core infrastructure to NIWA. NIWA own the specialist fit out and IP and on-grow kingfish for the high-end restaurant market. 

 

Demolition of two council buildings, in preparation for a property redevelopment, has commenced in Whangārei’s CBD.

 

On 30 June 2024, the occupancy rate for all properties ‘available for lease’ was 100%. However, there are 3 tenancies vacating in the months of July to September 2024 and the Property Team are actively seeking tenants for the properties to avoid any long term vacancy impacting budgets. To some extent, rent reviews on other properties will offset any impact.

 

Following council’s Health and Safety and Property Teams recommendation, provision of two specialist flammables and hazardous substances containers and other health and safety improvements are now being undertaken at the Union East Street Storage Facility.

FINANCE

The Finance team are currently working towards completing the 2023/24 year-end draft accounts for audit review, hence there is no financial report included in the July 2024 Council agenda.  These year-end draft accounts will be presented to Council at a workshop on 15 August 2024, and then to the full Council meeting on 27 August 2024.  Deloitte Auditors will be onsite from 19 August until early September completing their review of the final accounts, which are set to be given audit clearance, and be adopted by Council, at the Council meeting on 24 September 2024.

 

I am not aware of any fraud, nor am I investigating any incidents or suspected incidents of fraud at this time. 

 

7.3.3   Regulatory Services

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

The results of compliance monitoring for the period 1 to 30 June 2024 (and year-to-date figures) are summarised in the following table and discussed below.

 

Classification

Total

Full compliance

Low risk non-compliance

Moderate non-compliance

Significant non-compliance

Not exercised during period

Air Discharge

53

49

0

1

0

3

Coastal Air Discharge

1

0

0

0

0

1

Coastal Discharge

35

25

3

3

0

4

Coastal Permit

227

175

23

3

0

26

Land Discharge

178

79

26

4

0

69

Land Use Consent

144

61

1

0

0

82

NES-F

45

22

7

15

1

0

Water Discharge

78

44

9

12

3

0

Water Permit

144

47

1

1

0

95

Water Take

188

121

24

11

0

32

Total

1093

623

94

50

4

322

Percentage

 

57.0%

8.6%

4.6%

0.4%

29.5%

Year to date

7696

4984

851

706

84

1071

Percentage

 

64.8%

11.1%

9.2%

1.1%

13.9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal wastewater treatment plant compliance/enforcement

WWTP/Consent Status

Compliance for last 12 months

Enforcement Action/Response

Ahipara

Expires 2033

A red circle with a yellow triangle in the center

Description automatically generated

Under ANs (reissued in September 2022).

New SCUV unit currently being installed.

Ducting for power installed, shed in place, site visit with Ahipara Takiwa early June. Commissioning period to start end of July.

Russell

Expired 30 April 2024

(replacement consent application received)

A colorful circle with a few different colored sections

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Under AN.

Significant non-compliance currently being addressed.

Taipā

Expires 2029

A orange circle with a green triangle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Whatuwhiwhi

Expires 2025

A yellow and green circle with a triangle in the center

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Opononi & Omāpere

Expired 2019

(replacement consent under appeal)

A green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

Under AN.

Issues will be addressed in replacement consent.

Rāwene

Expired 2023

(replacement consent being processed)

A green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

Issues will be addressed in replacement consent.

Kaitāia

Expired 2021

(replacement consent being processed)

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

Under AN (for reticulation overflows).

Ongoing works on reticulation system. Issues will be addressed in replacement consent.

Kawakawa

Expires 2036

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Paihia

Expires 2034

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

 

Kaikohe

Expired 2021

(replacement consent being processed)

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

Issues will be addressed in replacement consent.

Kaiwaka

Expired 2022

Replaced consent granted on 27 May 2024 – expires 2049

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

Conditions imposed on the consent to improve WWTP performance/discharge quality.

Glinks Gully

Expires 31 July 2024

(replacement consent application received)

A green and orange pie chart

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Kohukohu

Expires 2026

 

A green yellow and orange circle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

 

Te Kopuru

Expires 2044

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Hihi

Expired 2022

(replacement consent being processed)

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Dargaville

Expires 2043

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

Under AN.

Issues addressed in replacement consent.

Ruakaka

Expires 2046

A yellow green and orange circle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Hikurangi

Expires 2025

A green yellow and orange pie chart

Description automatically generated

Improvements to plant performance currently underway.

Kaeo

Expired 2022

(replacement consent being processed)

A green and yellow pie chart

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Rangiputa

Expires 2032

A green and orange pie chart

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Maungaturoto

Expires 2032

A green and yellow pie chart

Description automatically generated

Under AN.

 

Mangawhai

Expires 2042

A green and yellow pie chart

Description automatically generated

Under AN.

Dam repairs completed. Extensive work being undertaken to address odour issues.

Tutukaka

Expired 31 May 2024

(replacement consent being processed)

A green circle with a yellow triangle in the center

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Whāngārei City

Expired 2022

(replacement consent conditions being finalised)

A green circle with a yellow triangle

Description automatically generated

Under AN for odour from plant.

Issues will be addressed in replacement consent.

Portland

Expired 31 May 2024

(replacement consent being processed)

A green and yellow circle with a pie chart

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Oakura

Expires 2025

A green and yellow pie chart

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Kerikeri

Expires 2036

A green circle with a yellow triangle in the middle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Waipū

Expires 2030

A green circle with a yellow triangle in the middle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Ngunguru

Expires 2035

A green circle with a yellow triangle in the middle

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Waiōtira

Expires 2030

A green circle with white background

Description automatically generated

None currently.

Compliance Status

Colour

Full compliance

Low risk non-compliance

Moderate non-compliance

Significant non-compliance

 

ENFORCEMENT

Abatement Notices, Infringement Notices and Formal Warnings

The following table gives the total numbers of abatement and infringement notices, and formal warnings issued in June 2024:

Nature of offence

Abatement notices

Infringement notices

Formal warnings

Other water discharge

1

0

0

Discharge to land

0

1

0

Sewage

3

0

0

Burning and smoke nuisance

5

3

0

Illegal use of lakebed or riverbed

0

1

0

Hazardous substances, spills and refuse

2

0

0

Burning & smoke nuisance

0

2

0

Earthworks/land use

2

0

0

Stormwater discharge

0

3

0

Total

13

10

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Court Cases Update

Litigation

Next Court Event/Action

Prosecution

District Court

Contravention of enforcement orders requiring remedial work.

Sentencing on 18 June 2024. Defendant was discharged without conviction and ordered to pay NRC costs of $10,000.

Prosecution

District Court

Discharge of sediment.

The next call-over is on 24 July 2024.

Prosecution

District Court

Discharge of raw farm dairy effluent to a stream; wastewater washed into stream; and overflow from pond.

Pre-trial hearing date is 10 and 11 July 2024. Crown submissions were filed on 19 June 2024.  Defendants were required to file their submissions by 3 July 2024.

Prosecution

District Court

Earthworks including: construction of tracks, earthworks and vegetation removal in and near wetland; stream crossings; discharge of sediment; and damming and diversions of tributaries.

Latest Court fixture was on 18 June 2024. The defendant has considered to change election from judge alone to jury trial. Judge directed the defendant to file the application by 3 July 2024 and NRC to respond by 17 July 2024. Judicial teams conference has been arranged for 29 July 2024.

Appeal against abatement notice & application for stay

Environment Court

Coastal works.

NRC is waiting for response to its costs proposal from the person responsible for the coastal works after his unsuccessful appeal.

Appeal against abatement notice

Environment Court

Aerial spraying in the vicinity of the spray-sensitive areas.

Case resolved and now closed after agreed outcome was reached at mediation on 5 June 2024.

Interim Enforcement Orders

Environment Court

Series of open burning in contravention of abatement notice.

Following the enforcement order decision made by the Environment Court on 12 June 2024, an order in relation to cost was made by consent for person responsible for the fire to pay $4,000 to NRC on date of settlement of sale of his property.

 

Current Legal Proceedings

Department

Description

Status

Consent decision appeal

Irrigation of avocado orchards and horticulture crops

Court released its ‘final’ decision on 11 July to grant all consents subject to some amended conditions.

Consent decision appeal

Replacement of consents for Opononi Wastewater Treatment System, Hokianga

Court assisted mediation held on 10 June 2024 which resulted in an agreed resolution of the appeal by a Consent Order.  This Consent Order is now being prepared for the Court to consider and determine.

Consent decision appeal

Site development works for a subdivision at Dip Road, Kamo

Appeal lodged on both WDC and NRC decision to grant consent.  Court assisted mediation held on 4 June 2024 which did not resolve the appeal.  Environment Court Hearing has been set down for five days commencing Monday 23 September 2024.

 

Consents in Process

During June 2024, a total of 53 Decisions were issued.  These decisions comprised:

Moorings

1

Coastal Permits

21

Coastal Discharge Permits

4

Land Discharge Permits

9

Land Use Consents

13

Water Takes

2

Bore Consents

4

 

Fifteen applications were received in June 2024.

 

Appointment of Hearing Commissioners

The following commissioners were appointed in June 2024 for one consent hearing:

·    Mr David Hill and Ms Sheila Taylor for Meridian Energy Limited’s consent application for a new solar farm at Ruakaka. The hearing is scheduled for 5 August 2024.

 

Consents Decisions and Progress on Notified Applications in Process, Objections and Appeals

The current level of notified application processing activities at the end of June 2024 is (by number):

Progress on Applications Previously Notified

6

Hearings and Decisions

1

Appeals/Objections

3

 

7.3.4   Environmental Services

LAND MANAGEMENT

Hill Country Erosion Programme

The second milestone report and invoice for $282,438.85 have been accepted by MPI.

In response to an underspend on the contractor pole planting budget for the 2023-24 and expected underspend for 2024-25, a contract variation has been approved in principle. Funds from future underspends will be re-allocated to fencing and/or native planting.

 

Kotuku Street property planting update

Winter 2023 saw many of the Land Team staff (with help from ELT and members of other NRC teams) working hard in very unpleasant conditions to plant 10,000 native trees at the Council’s Kotuku Street property. A year on, release sprays and improved weather conditions have seen some great growth in many areas of the planting. The Kotuku property includes wetland areas which are currently degraded by weed infestations and historic stock access. Some initial work has been undertaken to control the infestation and introduce native plants; however an ongoing programme of work is needed to get on top the weed infestation across the whole property as well as maintaining native plants introduced to the site. There is presently no resourcing allocated to this work.

A field of grass and trees

Description automatically generated

Planted area on the southern side of the wetland July 2023

 

A field with trees and a blue sky

Description automatically generated

One year on – looking great.

 

BIODIVERSITY

The annual community engagement and biodiversity plan has been completed and is now for review with the Community Engagement Management team.

 

A meeting was held with Whangārei District Council staff to better understand WDC activities for biodiversity protection in the Whangārei District and look for opportunities to work together.

 

Lakes

The annual report on hornwort control in dune lakes was completed and sent to the Environmental Protection Authority.

 

An online hui was held with Te Aupōuri to discuss Lake Wahakari and how NRC can support community aspirations for improving lake health.

 

Ten Lake Ecological Report Cards summarising the findings of the annual lakes survey were received from the contractors and reviewed and sent to iwi and landowners for their information.  The final reports cards will be uploaded to the NRC website in July. 

 

CoastCare

·      The dune planting season got well underway in June with planting days at several sites, most organised and attended by the CoastCare team: 

§ Langs Beach – with Langs CoastCare and Piroa Trust

§ Long Beach, Oneroa Bay Russell – with Russell Landcare Trust, Russell School and support from Predator Free Russell 

§ Otito Reserve, Matapōuri – with Department of Conservation (DOC) staff and volunteers, with the support of Te Whanau a Rangiwhakaahu Hapu 

§ Papanui Dunes, Pātaua South – organised by Aki Tai Here with plants provided by NRC and DOC 

§ Tern Point Recreation and Conservation Society held a dune planting day on Mangawhai sand spit with spinifex provided by NRC 

§ Mātihetihe Marae held two dune planting days with Mātihetihe Kura and Te Kura Taumata o Panguru with tihetihe (spinifex) provided by NRC 

·      A hui was held with Patuharakeke te taiao tima to debrief on the Bream Bay Dune Monitoring pilot programme and plan future work 

·      Education work included attending part of a Bream Bay College Geography field trip   

·      Weed control/planting prep undertaken by contractors at Mangawhai Heads, Matapōuri and Taipa 

 

A group of people on a beach

Description automatically generated

A group of people digging in the sand

Description automatically generated

A couple of women digging on a beach

Description automatically generated 

Photos clockwise from top left: Long Beach, Russell; Tern Point, Mangawhai; Otito Reserve, Matapouri, Papanui dunes Pātaua South 

 

Wetlands

Staff visited with partners from Kāpehu Marae to have a look at their kahikatea repo and provide advice on restoration and protection.  Staff accompanied a Patuharakeke representative on a site visit to provide advice on wetland restoration at their Takahiwai catchment restoration site.

 

 

 

General and Consent Advice

Staff attended the Top Energy Ngawha geothermal power station peer review panel meeting to provide ecological expert comment for their annual reporting.

 

NATURAL RESOURCES

Hydrology

·  

 

Rainfall

·    The Northland region averaged 190mm of rain for the month of June, which is 121% of the long-term median (or normal expected).

·    There was a pronounced regional difference in rainfall, with the north of Whangārei and the Hokianga averaging 218mm and southern areas averaging 136mm.

·    Highest rainfalls for the month were recorded at the Towai at Weta station (eastern Kāeo catchment) with 353.5mm, and the Waitangi at Wiroa Road station with 316.5mm. The Waitangi at McDonald Road station near Oramāhoe, had the highest percentage rainfall for the month with 221%.

·    Lowest rainfalls for June were recorded at Kai Iwi Lakes with 85mm, and the Awaroa at Wallace Road station in Ruawai with 95.5mm (both stations recording 75% of normal rainfall).

 

 

 

Cumulative rainfall

·    Cumulative rainfall for the June 2023 to July 2024 water year finished well below the historic average across the region, largely due to El Niño conditions during summer and early autumn. This is illustrated below with the cumulative rainfall graph for the Whakapara at Puhipuhi recording station.

·    Late autumn and early winter rainfall has helped lift the cumulative totals in recent months.

 

 

River flows

·    River flows in Northland’s primary monitored catchments ranged from above normal to very low for the month across the region.

·    River flows in the far north were generally normal to above normal.

·    River flows in central and southern areas from west to east, were predominantly below normal to low.

·    The regional pattern of river flow levels largely follows rainfall distribution.

 

 

Groundwater

·      Groundwater levels in most of Northland’s primary monitored aquifers were normal to above normal for June 2024.

·      Groundwater levels in Doubtless Bay and the wider Whangārei area were generally below normal to low.

·      Groundwater levels in the Russell at Foreshore Bore remained extremely low.

 

 

Science

·   The Lakes and Groundwater Scientists, and Environmental Monitoring Officer - Māori Relationships attended a meeting with representatives from local hapū Ngai Takoto at Lake Ngatu, Awanui.   The ongoing project to investigate the drivers of water quality and nutrient load in the lake was discussed and the proposed groundwater monitoring locations around the lake perimeter were visited. Council is requesting permission from Ngai Takoto and the Department of Conservation to install monitoring sites and begin a two-year monitoring program.

 

Water Quality Field Operations

·   Council has been working with Ngati Kahu and Utakura Taio Roopu to support freshwater monitoring initiatives.

 

POLICY AND PLANNING

Hearings for the Far North Proposed District Plan are underway and will continue until August 2025.  Staff are monitoring the process and will provide input to support the points raised in the NRC submissions.

 

Submissions on the RMA Amendment Bill No1 and the RMA Extended Duration of Coastal Permits Bill have been lodged with central government.

 

The Select Committee report on the Māori Wards Bill has been released with only very minor amendments proposed.

 

A consultation document on the construction of ‘Granny Flats’ without requiring building or resource consent has been released with the chance to provide input until August 12. This is not a formal process and so staff will provide technical feedback on the initial proposal.  The Bill is expected to be released for submissions later in the year.

 

7.3.5   Biosecurity

INCURSIONS

Wallabies

Staff have received an increasing number of wallaby sightings most recently in the mid north area from Kaikohe across to Kawakawa and down to Matawaia. These have been reported at various locations, forming a pattern of activity.

 

Trail cameras have been deployed and staff have conducted thermal drone surveys. Given the increased frequency of sightings and the resources needed for effective monitoring staff have reported these developments to Biosecurity New Zealand who would lead a response should wallabies be confirmed and will continue to update as we gather more information.

 

PREDATOR FREE 2050

Predator Free Whangārei 

A cyanide operation in the DOC Ocean beach coastal reserve was successfully carried out and yielded 77 possums - this will be followed-up with wax tag monitoring. A service contract with Bream Head Conservation Trust (BHCT) for Te Whara is now in place and is going well. Landowner permissions have been obtained to allow the night flying of a thermal drone aimed at detecting possums, and a recent mail out to Parua bay landowners received strong support for the upcoming buffer zone work. McLeod’s Bay working block has transitioned from knockdown to a mop-up phase as possum detections have significantly reduced.   

 

A new field lead starts in July which will help with the effective delivery of fieldwork. Team members supported the Aki Tai Here / Weed Action Trust Community delivery on Manaia maunga, and others attended the Parua bay Sunday markets to promote the pending buffer zone work. Open days at the field depot have commenced for residents local to the  buffer area in anticipation of an August install date.

 

Predator Free Pēwhairangi Whanui Project

Purerua-Mataroa

Te Ahutai Kaimahi have completed monitoring at Mataroa and Te Tii, and the results will inform the next steps for elimination. Bait station top-ups occurred with pindone, double-tap and pestoff across 4,600ha. Toxin operations at the project buffer (Tapuaetahi and Taronui) have gone well, with very low pest numbers, and the infrastructure of traps and poisons continue to prevent reinvasion of the eradication zone.

 

Russell

Knockdown of rats and possums across the 220ha Tapeka peninsula has moved to mop-up as bait take has reduced significantly. Installation of devices within the 100ha Russell township buffer continued over June, while the servicing of devices in the elimination area showed a small increase in possum and rat presence.

 

Rakaumangamanga

Monitoring took place across specific sections of the 1,000ha elimination zone and the results indicated high possum presence. Toxin delivery commenced in June and will continue through July as more of the devices within the elimination zone are activated.

 

Whangarei PF2050 team member servicing bait stations at Ocean Beach

 

 

MARINE BIOSECURITY

Caulerpa

Weather continued to hamper mechanical dredging this month, with the barge unable to operate in winds above 30-35 knots from the west, southwest, or northwest. Consequently, several stand-down days or periods of days have been required. In some instances, the barge had to be relocated offsite to shelter and wait for the weather to pass, resulting in multiple days of no dredging. To mitigate the need to move in the future, the NRC marine biosecurity team has applied for two temporary moorings to be placed in Omākiwi Cove.

 

Given the end of the current funding, the team has been developing a plan to demobilize the barge, perform necessary maintenance on the equipment (painting and de-rusting). The barge has accumulated considerable biofouling since operations started, so the team plans to wrap and treat the hull with chlorine next week. This will ensure all small fragments of Caulerpa that have become entrained in the biofouling are rendered non-viable before moving from the controlled area notice zone.

 

Commercial dive specialists (CDS) undertook diver-assisted suction dredging from June 10th to June 19th. They covered a total area of approximately 1,593 m² over the 9 days of dredging. This initially involved dredged material being pumped into a cage, then offloaded onshore to the disposal pit. To increase efficiency, the team partnered up with the Johnson Bros team and developed a system where the divers dredge spoils were pumped directly onto the barge to be processed through the trommels allowing for operations to continue uninterrupted.

A boat in the water

Description automatically generated

Topside (CDS) team managing hoses for the diver assisted suction dredging

 

KAURI PROTECTION

Te Araroa Trail (Helena ridge track) upgrade has been completed and is now re-opened to the public. This track project had improvements made to a 5585-metre section of the trail including new aggregate, cellular geoweb, an installation of timber edge board, boxed steps, culverts, low timber boardwalk, and the additional install of a round timber viewing platform and passing bay. 

 

Staff made a site visit to Pouto Topu- A- Trust whenua on the Pouto peninsula at the request of the owners to inspect a stand of remnant kauri.  This stand was considered by staff to be very healthy with no evidence of any disease.  Staff are looking forward to assisting Pouto Topu- A- Trust with their ongoing projects including kauri mapping, sampling, and track development. 

 

Recent drone footage across parts of Northland has successfully mapped kauri in small to medium parcels and there have been multiple requests this past month from other stakeholders requesting drone assisted surveillance to identify the presence of kauri dieback and disease.  This has highlighted the growing awareness of this tool and the usefulness of drones for aerial forest survey. 

 

7.3.6   Governance And Engagement

Māori Relationships

Te Korowai Manaaki Terenga Paraoa, and Mama Neke Maunga

Despite the power outage and weather, the Elder Abuse Awareness Event was a hit. A small but fun-loving group attended, making it a memorable day for all. Below are the photos captured on the day.

A huge mihi to Ruby from Te Hā o ngā Tūpuna for bringing the fabulous kaumātua through from Kaikohe and to our Whangārei kaumātua for attending. Mike Hoeta kept us entertained while the power was on, and our extraordinary MC, Te Hiwi Preston, with his skill and fun personality, maintained great whanaungatanga throughout the day.

None of this would have been possible without the commitment and presence of our kaumātua who were able to leave loaded with goodies given with aroha and care.

Acknowledgements were expressed to Northland Regional Council. Ringa Atawhai, Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), Ngāti Hine Health Trust (NHHT), Age Concern, Mate Wareware, Hāpai Te Hauora, E Tū Whānau, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Disorder Care Action Network (FASD-CAN), and Hauora Whakamana for their presence and invaluable information. Thanks also to VOYCE and Wot Matters for providing the prizes and to Tiffany's for their kai. 

The next day, was the launch of the collaboration between Te Korowai Manaaki Terenga Paraoa with Māmā Neke Maunga exhibition titled "Te Hā O Ngā Tupuna Tehei wā Mauri Ora." This exhibition was on show for two weeks at the Hihiaua Cultural Centre as a celebration of Whakapapa. Again, braving the weather, our Kaumātua came to tautoko.

"Te Hā O Ngā Tupuna Tehei wā Mauri Ora" exhibition at the Hihiaua Cultural Centre, Whangārei.

A group of people standing in a line

Description automatically generated

Whanau and Marae Preparedness – Te Taitokerau Resilience Action Plan

The challenges posed by Cyclone Gabrielle have underscored the critical need for readiness and preparedness within our communities and our Marae. “Grab bags” with essential items to grab in the event of an emergency (right).

 

 

A group of people standing around a table

Description automatically generated

This process is guided by the Whanau Oranga Framework, ensuring what matters to whānau is paramount (right).

 

Oturei Marae participants were guided through a series of topics to build their case to capture their insights and ideas to build their resilience and preparedness (below).

 

A diagram of a diagram

Description automatically generated

 

A group of post-it notes on a board

Description automatically generated

A group of post it notes on brown cardboard

Description automatically generated

Te Mahuri o te Taiao – Kaipara Youth Participatory Grant Makers

Continued facilitation support with a panel of local Rangatahi, 18 to 24 years, designing a funding programme.  The fund’s purpose is to enable rangatahi-led projects that address environmental and climate challenges in the Northern Kaipara region (including North Wellsford and capturing the Marae Ouruawharo, the southernmost marae for Te Uri O Hau, the Waipoua Forest and Whangārei).

Their vision is to support our whānaunga in the Kaipara through a Te Ao Māori lens, learning new things to deepen understanding of our relationship with taiao, ensuring the health, wealth, and wellbeing of both whānau and taiao thrive for future generations to maintain and enjoy.

Taiao ka puāwai – Whānau ka puāwai

“He pihinga I te onemata, ka puāwai”

“A seedling this planted in fertile soil will thrive”

 

Valuing:

·      Grounded in local knowledge and active in their community

·      Climate Change Agents

·      Creativity

·      Whakapapa

·      Adaptation

·      Collaborative and empowering Inspiring Youth Leaders

·      Entrepreneurial mind

·      Mātauranga Māori

·      Self-determined wellness

A group of people sitting at a table

Description automatically generated

 

A blueprint for many more rangatahi Manaaki taiao movements to come.

A group of people sitting around a table

Description automatically generated

Ngāti Rēhia wānanga Moana – June 2024

The Māori Relationships Team recently supported a two day hui held at Tākou. Professor Kura Paul-Burke was there to present her recent mahi regarding mātauranga moana and data sovereignty.

 

A person standing in front of a screen

Description automatically generated

 

Hannah Street Blessing

NRC engaged local hapū Te Parawhau for cultural support during plans to demolish buildings in the Whangārei CBD area.

 

A group of people standing in a circle

Description automatically generated

 

Ngūnguru seawall:

In recent weeks we have been working closely with whānau at a papakāinga at Ngūnguru  who are working through consenting issues. It has been important to take the time and care with forming and strengthening this relationship. We will continue to work alongside the consents team and the whānau to get a positive outcome for all.

 

Economic Development

·    Northland Inc Limited – finalise common text for all four council’s LTPs; acknowledgement letter to Nicole Anderson (retiring director).  

·    Regional Infrastructure Fund – support Northland Inc develop a list of projects for RIF funding; prepared documents for ILGACE and JREDC workshops.

·    Te Tai Tokerau Water Trust – organised councillor field trip to Te Waihekeora reservoir; co-ordination with other co-funders.

·    Ngawha Innovation and Enterprise Centre – allocation of funding was approved as per the Underwrite Commitment Agreement between NRC and Northland Inc.

·    Northland Forward Together– developed common agenda paper for all four local authorities to use to adopt the revised strategic collaboration document.

·    Caulerpa – initial report setting out the cost of doing nothing to prevent the spread of Caulerpa in the Bay of Islands. 

·    Northland Economic Quarterly e-newsletter – Issue 42 distributed on 27 June and available online at https://www.nrc.govt.nz/your-council/online-services/enewsletters/. The annual section contained data from the 2023 agricultural production survey while the spotlight section examined some of the information available in the initial release of the 2023 Census results.

 

Community Engagement

Social media

Overall performance across social media platforms:

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

 

Top posts

The following posts reached the most people: media release on new bus service for students, video about Predator Free Russell and, a video on hapū led predator control for Ngāti Rēhia.

*Reach: total number of people who saw the content.

 

Sentiment

Most positive sentiment received in response to celebrating volunteers, plastic pollution video series, Pēwhairangi video series. Most negative sentiment received in response to coastal works media release.

Title: Inserting image...

 

eNewsletters:

·    Hills to Harbour | Ki uta, ki tai: Our Hills to Harbour e-newsletter covering land management news was issued in June. This issue covered: feedback on the draft Freshwater Plan Change; FAQs on poplars and willows; the Find-A-Pest biosecurity app; rules and regulations; and the Oromahoe Farm Trust Open Day. 592 subscribers, 52.8% open rate

·    Economic Quarterly: Our quartely update featuring quick statistics and commentary around economic activity. 292 subscribers, 59.8% open rate

 

Website

Top three website pages:

·    Environmental data hub

·    Kaeo webcam

·    Pest Control Hub

 

 

Digital KPIs

Key Performance Indicators

Feb-24

Mar-24

Apl-24

May-24

June -24

WEB

 

 

 

 

 

# Visits to the NRC website

45,249

48,020

52,819

39,995

44,565

E-payments made

13

12

6

19

11

# subscribed web alerts (cumulative)

1,348

1,342

1,357

1,591

1,601

# subscribed to eNewsletters (cumulative)

5,431

5,421

5,580

5,593

5,574

Cdem sOCIAL MEDIA (CUMULATIVE)

 

 

 

 

 

# CDEM Facebook fans

36,233

36,288

36,396

36,468

36,823

# CDEM Overall Facebook Reach

39,203

54,326

87,766

54,326

212,487

 

Media Liaison

Two Northland Regional Council media releases were created and distributed to media throughout Te Taitokerau during June. Topics included: 

·    Long Term Plan 2024-2034 formally adopted

·    New Whangārei bus service for intermediate, high school students.

A number of media enquiries were also received and responded to. Combined, this activity helped generate 68 items mentioning Northland Regional Council as reported by media monitoring agency Fuseworks. 

Top five sources of Te Taitokerau coverage:  Northern Advocate (19), NZ Herald (11), Radio New Zealand (6), Northern News (4) and Stuff (4).

 

Content types were split as follows: 

 

Projects and campaigns

·    SchoolLink: Community Engagement supported Transport with an online and offline promotional campaign for the new SchoolLink service. Activities included a media release, social media, posters, and digital display advertising. Significant levels of positive feedback from the community were received via social channels, providing an overwhelmingly positive response to this long-awaited service.

·    National Volunteer Week: Community Engagement worked on social media posts for National Volunteer Week, raising awareness of the vital role volunteers play in helping NRC and the community, and encouraging others to get involved. Content included a video shout out featuring staff from various teams, a video of Coastcare volunteers at a recent Langs Beach planting day, and posts highlighting volunteers working in the pest plant and marine protected areas spaces. The campaign generated good engagement and positive sentiment.

·    Tū i te ora Scholarship: With the scholarship recipients selected, we announced the six recipients via media release, social media, and rates brochure (and have prepared a piece for the next edition of Huaki). We have also produced written profiles on each recipient (which can be viewed at scholarships.nrc.govt.nz and Our Northland). We will produce more content with the recipients during their work experience later this year.

·    Plastic pollution in Te Taitokerau: To help share the storymap about plastic pollution in Te Taitokerau, we created a series of three short social media videos. The purpose of the videos was to educate on the difference between micro/macro plastics, promote the research NRC is doing alongside our partners and to encourage people to find out more through our website. 

·    Predador-Free Pēwhairangi Whānui  video series: We worked with the Predator Free team to release four videos on our social media channels.  The video’s received good engagement and reach.  Check out the videos Te Ahutai, Purerua Mataroa,  Rākaumangamanga, and Russell.

·    Freshwater Plan Change: To ‘close the loop’ with the community, we updated our website to provide a downloadable summary report and full reports of public feedback from the consultation on the draft Freshwater Plan Change. We also published the first six-monthly e-newsletter to keep stakeholders and other interested parties informed of progress on the Freshwater Plan. A media release is also underway.

·    Marine protected areas: A communication and engagement plan has been put in place for the coming year, working alongside hapū. Two community-driven videos have been developed and an online breach reporting form is underway.

·    Aotahi: The new council intranet, Aotahi, has been launched. We are continuing to gather feedback and encourage contributions from across the organisation.

 

Education

Matariki events

Schools and early childhood centres throughout Te Taitokerau have been taking the opportunity to honour Matariki by celebrating, reflecting and setting goals with their local communities.  Our facilitators supported 13 enviroschools to receive funding for native planting through the 1 Billion Trees programme, as part of their celebrations.

 

A group of people in a field

Description automatically generatedHarvest School, Kerikeri

BestStart Kindy and BestStart Pipiwai Road early childhood centres, Whangārei A person and child holding a shovel

Description automatically generated

 

Environmental Leaders Fund (ELF) progress reports

2023/24 recipients of ELF are making good progress on their climate action projects.  The project completion date is December 2024.

Ngataki School students add mulch to their fruit trees – growing their own kai and water conservation (climate actions)

A bulletin board with pictures of kids

Description automatically generatedHarinui Early Childhood Learning Centre’s mini recycling centre – processing waste on site (climate action)

 

Kaipara assessment and Whangārei skills workshops for Project Pest Control (PPC)

All three Kaipara secondary schools successfully wrapped up their 2024 NCEA-based PPC experience at the Waikare Events Centre, Kai Iwi whilst Whangārei’s equivalent kicked off at Kiwi North.  The senior students learned skills in trapping a range of animal pests, plucking and skinning possums and running a trapline.  NRC Biosecurity and Predator Free staff, Can Train NZ, Animal Pest NZ and a PPC graduate provided the tuition.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kaipara students prove they can set raised set leg hold traps to avoid catching non-target species.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biosecurity staff member– supervised rat trapping in the ngahere at Kiwi North, Whangārei. A group of women in the woods

Description automatically generated

 

Far North Wai Fencing assessment day

The Whangārei NCEA-based assessment workshop was held on the Pamu Rangiputa Station on Karikari Peninsula.  Students handed in their theory work, were assessed on their practical skills and fenced off a waterway.  East Coast fencing contractors, Rangiputa Station and Can Train NZ joined a NRC Land Mangement team member in providing tuition. 

 

A few women in orange vests measuring a pole

Description automatically generated

A group of people in orange vests

Description automatically generated

Students fence off a waterway on Rangiputa Station, Karikari Peninsula.

Land Management staff member – checks that the fence post is going in correctly.

 

Facilitating Enviroschools communities

During June, Enviroschools Facilitators visited or held specific online interactions with over 40 enviroschools’ communities.

 

Local government official information (LGOIMA) requests

We received 21 LGOIMA requests in June 2024. Overall, we have received 17 less requests than at the same time in 2023. Within this calendar year (Jan – July 2024) there have been three LGOIMA requests that have failed to be responded to within 20 days (already reported).

A graph with lines and numbers

Description automatically generated

A screenshot of a graph

Description automatically generated

 

Tāiki ē Te Tiriti o Waitangi Strategic Intent and Implementation Plan

The following is a report provided by the Māori Relationships team that updates progress against the Priority Actions set out in Tāiki ē.

Action

Work item

Progress

Notes

Budget

Action 01

Te Tiriti Health Check

In progress

Scope received from Whaia Legal and Buddle Findlay.

$25,000 per annum for independent ‘health check’ of council’s Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations
$100,000 per annum from 2022/23 for implementation of recommendations

Action 02

Continue developing Tāiki ē

On track

Tāiki ē now covers all five whainga adopted at 23 April 2024 council meeting.

Within existing resources

Action 03

Increase IHEMPs

On track

Continue to work with climate resilience team to support IHEMP's via climate change adaptation fund.
LTP budget increase from 1 July - allocation process to begin in July

Confirm budget commencing 24/25 financial year

Action 04

Manawhakahono a Rohe agreements

In progress

Te Parawhau formally signed up to multi hapū agreement 29 April 2024.  Work still to be done to progress development by other hapū and iwi.

 $30,000 per annum

Action 05

Māori RMA Hearing Commissioners

On track

New cohort to commence following RMA 101 training in 24/25 financial year.

Taiki e implementation (cost $33,000)

Action 06

Hapū training in RMA processes

On track

New cohort to commence 24/25 financial year.

$20,000 per annum RMA noho – Wananga Waiora

Action 07

Environmental Monitoring Programme

In progress

Mātauranga Māori Freshwater Monitoring Framework. LTP budget increase from 1 July 2024 - allocation process to commence July 2024

Confirm budget commencing 24/25 financial year

Action 08

Hapū freshwater monitoring

In progress

Budgeted: $250,000 22/23 ongoing (specific purpose and allocation yet to be confirmed)

Action 09

Regulatory services delivery

In progress

Resource Consent Review and Report completed.

To be budgeted

Action 10

Support education providers

In progress

No change June 2024 - Initial work underway across various providers.

Unbudgeted

Action 11

Tangata whenua resourced to participate in council decision making processes.

In progress

Long Term Plan has identified the current funding for tangata whenua operational activities and Tāiki ē has budget allocated.

Action 12

External funding for iwi/hapū

In progress

Regional Leadership Group – across sector funding opportunities being explored.

Within existing resources.

Action 13

Joint advocacy

On track

Amendment to Local Government Electoral Legislation (Māori Wards and Constituencies) submission presented.

Within existing resources.

Action 14

Streamline councils' collaboration

In progress

Initial cross council meeting held - each group working to identify priorities and to agree on shared priorities to commence working together.

Within existing resources.

Action 15

Tangata whenua governance opportunities

On track

 Tangata Whenua Expert roles

Confirm budget commencing 24/25 financial year

Action 16

Project delivery

In progress

GIS project to pilot with specific areas of council projects to be identified to assist iwi and hapū relationships and have a shared understanding of the work that happens in the region.

Budgeted

Action 17

Cultural competency framework

In progress

Draft Māori Employment Outcomes Framework work in progress

Within existing resources

Action 18

Scholarship/Intern programme

 

Scholarship process completed. Details of successful applicants to be shared once available

Budgeted: 8 scholarships at $4,000 per annum (4 specifically for Māori)

Action 19

Iwi/hapū engagement policy re LTP, RPS, etc

On track

Policy on advancing partnerships with Māori under review as part of the LTP process. LTP marae-based engagements were held.

Within existing resources.

Action 20

Iwi/hapū contacts database

In progress

Work continues to update and maintain database including GIS and IRIS updates

Budgeted $20,000

Action 21

Transfer of powers

In progress

Partnerships Roadmap to Transfer of Powers paper deferred to Sept. TTMAC meeting

Unbudgeted

Action 22

Māori constituencies

In progress

To be revisited for 2025 LG elections and introduction of new bill.

Budgeted: $20,000 allocated in governance budget for 22(a)

Action 23

Equitable/safe environment for councillors

On track

Funding of Te Reo Māori interpreter services commencing 24/25 financial year

Within existing resources

Action 24

Procurement

In progress

Progressive procurement being considered in partnership with Amotai/Whāriki.

Within existing resources.

Action 25

Council contracts for iwi and hapū

In progress

Progressive procurement to be explored and benefits for tangata whenua and council under the economic whainga.

Within existing resources.

Action 26

Long Term Plan / Annual Plan

On track

LTP process completed

Within existing resources.

Action 27

Freshwater Plan

In progress

TWWAG updates and progress report Freshwater Farm Plans

Budgeted: Annually $250,000 is set aside in the current LTP 2021 – 2031 for the Te Mana o Te Wai Fund. Within existing resources.

Action 28

Community resilience to climate crisis

In progress

Developing Flood Resilient Marae and the Te Taitokerau Resilience Action Plan.

Budgeted and underway within existing resources. Further budget required to fully implement the action.

Action 29

Sustainable economic development

In progress

Work in progress with iwi, Northland Inc & Joint Regional Economic Development Committee.

Unbudgeted Further budget required to fully implement the action.

Action 30

Marine protection and development

In progress

Work being done by the Bio Security Group in regards to Rahui Moana with hapū.

Budgeted: $50,000 Further budget required to fully implement the action.

Action 31

KPI framework for Ngā Whainga

Not started

To be commenced.

Within existing resources

7.3.7   Community Resilience

MARITIME

There were 12 incidents reported in June mostly involving bylaw offences and debris/ navigational hazards.

 

The Maritime team provided vessel assistance to other departments for the usual water quality runs, plus some additional trips assisting the biosecurity team for the Caulerpa response. Waikare II was used including a day escorting national media.  

 

The maritime team and Maritime New Zealand conducted 2 days of oil spill training testing the purpose-built hydraulic system aboard the Waikare II and its compatibility with national response team equipment. The test was successful and the Waikare II will be contracted for a national training exercise in September. Close monitoring of the hull anodes and the silicon antifoul wrap is being carried out with the assistance of the dive team to ensure performance and integrity of the new vessel.   

 

The sale of the old Waikare has been concluded. It has been sold to a Western Australian company who specialise in supplying charter vessels to the oil and gas industry. The vessel will be shipped to Australia in due course.  

 

TRANSPORT

 

Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2024

The Government released the final Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2024 (GPS) on 27 June 2024. The GPS outlines the Government’s investment priorities for land transport over the next 10 years through the National Land Transport Fund (NLTF) which is reviewed and updated every three years. A review of the final GPS confirmed that there are no significant amendments to the final GPS that would necessitate changes to the Regional Land Transport Plan of such a nature as to trigger the Significance Policy and require further public consultation.

 

PASSENGER TRANSPORT  

The Whangarei SchoolLink Services commenced operation on Monday, 17 June 2024 on the following routes: - 

·    Onerahi to Whangārei Intermediate

·    Onerahi to Kamo High School

·    Raumanga to Whangārei Boys' and Girls' High

·    Raumanga to Tikipunga High

·    Raumanga to Kamo High

 

It is too early to ascertain the trend in uptake of the service, but early indications are positive.

 

TOTAL MOBILITY SCHEME (TM)

National Meeting

The National TM Coordinators meeting was held at Auckland Transport on Wednesday 19 June 2024 where an update was provided on the delayed Ministry of Transport (MoT) TM review was provided. Other items covered included budget over-runs and lack of funding created by the uptake on the governments 75% discounted fare. Members were also informed that the eligibility criteria review has been delayed pending the outcome of the MoT review.

 

Regional Working Group

This meeting was held on Thursday 27 June 2024 where staff met with all of the Regional Agencies and Transport Operators. The main discussion point was the increasing number of clients coming onto the scheme and the pressure put on available funding.

 

Total mobility Trips and client travel for June 2024:

Whangarei – 1,775 clients undertaking 3,546 trips

Far North – 294 clients undertaking 254 trips

 

Regional Road Safety

Staff attended a Matariki event at Otangarei School on 20 June 2024. The goal was to raise awareness for road safety, particularly around restraint use and staff asked the public to make road safety wishes for Northland as pictured below.

 

With the reopening of the Brynderwyns, a fatigue campaign was pushed with the Oakleigh Service Station on State Highway One who offered free coffees to fatigued drivers over the long weekend for Matariki and gave out fatigue information with tips on travelling long distances.

 

RIVERS

Awanui Scheme Upgrade

Work sites have been winterised and staff are planning next year's works programme. 

 

Kawakawa Deflection Bank   

Machine work is complete in Kawakawa, with only minor site tidying next to the library remaining.  Despite recent heavy rain, the deflection bank performed well.  It is projected that the project will close out approximately 300k under budget, staff will investigate if remaining funds can be allocated to other Crown Infrastructure Partner projects.

 

Culvert grate installed by local business Kawakawa Engineering

 

 

Final bit of work to complete the bank raising near the library

 

 

 

Looking downstream from the library park, a view of the deflection bank with grass starting to strike

 

 

Otiria Spillway

Work is finished, pending the installation of guard rails on Ngapipito Road and a road safety audit before transferring assets to FNDC. A blessing/opening ceremony for the spillway and deflection bank is planned for 09 August.

 

Upper Kawakawa Catchment Nature Based Solutions

Significant progress has been made with landowners at identified road locations. Four priority locations have been chosen for pilot projects. We have consulted with landowners upstream and downstream to gather input on road flooding issues and potential solutions. We are now drafting concept designs and rough cost estimates, aiming to take this back for final community approval.

 

Matangirau Floodway

Positive meetings have been held with most of the community, with 4 out of 10 blocks agreeing to the flood mitigation works.  However, some key shareholders oppose the works, blocking essential properties for the floodway.  Staff will continue to work with the community to resolve any concerns but there is a risk that if a resolution cannot be found the external funding wil nee dot be diverted to another project to ensure they are spent with hthe funding timeframe.

 

Kaeo Stage 2

The Kaeo Stage 2 peer review has emphasised some geomorphology concerns, mainly the difficulty of maintaining a new Kaeo River Channel and old Kaeo River Channel with much smaller flows.  We are currently modelling a high-level spillway instead of a new channel alignment and considering a weir behind the community hall to manage and detain peak peak-floodwaters from the Waikare Creek catchment.

 

 

Flood Resilient Māori Communities and Marae

The team have identified 35 of the most flood affected Marae and have started engaugement with the Whaunu.   The team has engaged with 12 marae so far, with the main goal is to share information and implement solutions to make the Marae more flood Resilient.  RNZ article: Northland's most flood-prone marae to receive resilience boost | RNZ News

 

CIVIL DEFENCE AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Major Power Outage in Northland on June 20

There was a major power outage in Northland on Thursday 20 June, around 11:00 am. A large power tower, owned by Transpower and located near Glorit, unexpectedly tipped over. This caused a complete loss of electricity for a large portion of Northland, affecting areas from Langs Beach/Dargaville and everything north of there.

 

Since the exact timeframe for restoring power was uncertain and to ensure a coordinated response across different organisations, the Northland Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Emergency Coordination Centre (ECC) along with Emergency Operations Centres (EOCs) in Whangarei, Far North, and Kaipara were activated. 

 

Additionally, stakeholder teleconferences were held. Relevant groups and agencies involved in the power grid and emergency response came together to develop a common understanding and response to the situation.   Power was restored to residential customers by 6.00 pm, with some major commercial customers not being restored until a full temporary repair was made on Sunday.   Debriefs are being carried out by respective agencies, including with the Northland Lifelines Utility Group.  

 

Severe weather warnings for rainfall from the MetService were monitored by the CDEM on call for the 14 and 20 June. 

 

CLIMATE ACTION AND NATURAL HAZARDS

Climate Action

A highlight for staff was attending the Environmental Defence Society (EDS) Conference in Ōtautahi Christchurch. The conference theme was The Future is Now: Biodiversity, Climate, and us. The overall messaging was that the climate and biodiversity crises are intrinsically linked, and humans are being buffeted by the instability caused by both. Biodiversity is a key pillar in maintaining stable earth systems that enable people and the environment to thrive. There was strong messaging around the need to be making mokopuna decisions – decisions for future generations and this included a call to include more youth voice in strategy development and decision making.  All presentations are accessible online here.

 

Climate Change Education Tool

NRC now has access to the climate change education tool - Climate Fresk. The tool is designed to make learning about climate science accessible to everyone through engaging, collaborative, and creative workshops. The interactive sessions are designed to help participants explore the science of climate change, the impacts it is creating now, and in the future, what we can do about it.  We will be looking to run a workshop with councillors, roll it out across staff and then take it into communities to facilitate conversations about the changing climate and the potential impacts.

 

Natural Hazards

NRC Risk Portal

Urban Intelligence’s Resilience Explorer was selected as the preferred supplier for the Risk Portal. The project will start in July and is a 12-month project to support NRC and district councils in understanding risks from climate change to inform decision making and it can also be used in community consultation.

 

Taumata Hui

Staff presented at the Taumata Hui for Te Uri o Hau. This meeting was critical to get the support of the iwi in engaging with hapu around Climate Adaptation. Te Uri o Hau are working on a programme of risk assessment and climate adaptation. They were appreciative of the information, data and support the council can provide.

 

Flood Risk Modelling work

The Natural Hazards Advisor continues to work with our rivers team to ensure that contracted modelling work is delivered and quality assured. Three models (Whangarei, Ruawai and Waimea) are close to delivery and staff will then work with the GIS team to publish these on the Natural Hazards Portal on the NRC website.

 

The draft of the Regional Approach to Flood Risk Management has been completed. This tool will support NRC staff to manage and prioritise flood risk reduction work at the operational level. Staff will review the framework and then work to imbed into council processes using cross-organisation working groups.

 

7.3.8   KAIPARA MOANA REMEDIATION

Independent survey of KMR landowners

In April and May 2024, the Ministry for the Environment ran a second independent survey of 207 landowners/groups who have already engaged, or who are continuing to engage, with KMR.  The aim was to understand the drivers for and barriers to working with KMR.  This survey complements a 2023 survey which focused on operational areas for improvement.

Overall, the 2024 survey results were extremely pleasing, benchmarking KMR very highly compared to norms for similar (voluntary) programmes:

·      The vast majority ‘agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ that their interactions with KMR were positive (88%) and their questions were answered adequately (86%).

·      The vast majority found it ‘easy’ or ‘very easy’ to obtain the information (81%) or advice (83%) they needed from KMR.

The 2024 survey affirmed previous survey results as well as wider feedback to KMR to date.  Where the survey identified possible improvements, in the large majority of cases, KMR has already made changes or is working towards better practice.  The survey confirmed previous largely anecdotal evidence that some landowners/groups were struggling to reach the required matched co-funding.

While the majority (72%) indicated that people they know ‘strongly approve’ or ‘somewhat approve’ of their work with KMR, the 2024 survey also identified a potential new barrier to some landowners/groups taking action with KMR  - viz. that other landowners/groups would view them [negatively] (e.g. as ‘greenies’).  The comments appear reflective of wider concerns in the rural community (e.g. ‘loss of grazed areas’; ‘frustration with regulatory challenges, red tape’).

The main survey results are set out below.  As not everyone who completed the survey completed every question, the percentages given refer only to those who answered that question.

·    The 2024 survey confirmed that most landowners/groups find out about KMR via someone they know (45%), a KMR newsletter or newspaper article (22%), or at a public event (20%).

·    Of those surveyed, the majority were beef farmers (68%) or sheep farmers (20%).  Of those surveyed who provided their postcode (optional), most came from the mid-section of the Kaipara Moana catchment (viz. around Maungatūroto (0520 postcode), Warkworth (0910) or Tāpora/Wellsford (0977)).

·    When asked what prompted them to work with KMR, most of the landowners/groups mentioned ‘financial assistance’ and ‘environmental/community alignment’ as primary reasons.  Secondary reasons were the ‘planning and technical advice’ provided by KMR, as well as ‘positive recommendations and experiences’ by others.

·    When asked what their KMR project means to them, those surveyed mentioned ‘financial assistance’ and ‘environmental legacy’ as the key aspects, followed by ‘personal and community benefits’ and ‘regulatory compliance’.

·    When asked what they liked the most about working with KMR, those surveyed mentioned ‘supportive and knowledgeable people’ and ‘funding and financial assistance’ as the primary aspects, ‘technical expertise and practical advice’ as secondary aspects.

·    When asked about the benefits of working with KMR, those surveyed highlighted ‘financial and practical support’, ‘expertise’, and ‘community and collaborative benefits’, and indicated the ‘ease of grant application and project execution’, ‘hands-on support’ from KMR, ‘advice on fencing, planting and ecological management’, ‘learning opportunities and knowledge-sharing’, ‘environmental benefits and healthier farm management’, as well as ‘strengthened community engagement and collaboration’.

·    When asked what makes it easy to work with KMR, those surveyed highlighted ‘effective communication’, ‘quality of ‘field advisors’ and ‘ease of process and contract management’.

·    When asked about the disadvantages of working with KMR, those surveyed either mentioned ‘none’ or highlighted ‘regulatory and administrative challenges’, ‘funding constraints’, and ‘operational and project management issues’. Those who indicated challenges specified matters such as ‘slow approval processes delaying project start’, ‘regulatory constraints’, ‘insufficient funding’, ‘constraints relating to organic farming’ (e.g. use of weedkiller; species suitability for organic land), and ‘communications challenges’ as lowlights.

·    When asked what makes it difficult to work with KMR, nearly a third of those surveyed indicated ‘nothing’, ‘can’t think of anything’, or similar. However, others noted operational or administrative challenges including certified land constraints, an inexperienced Field Advisor, communications issues (e.g. KMR emails going to spam), plant procurement and supplier issues, regulatory constraints, and funding challenges (including KMR market rates being too low).

·    When asked what was the top priority for KMR to improve, most of the landowners/groups surveyed indicated “more funding” [noting that the KMR matched co-funding requirement is a condition of Crown funding], operational improvements (e.g. streamlining administrative processes, plant quality control), and better communication on process, timing and what support KMR can offer.  Many recommendations were outside of KMR’s mandate (e.g. the need for: rates reductions for retired land; ongoing environmental subsidies; reduced regulation; community engagement via schools; and broader environmental awareness campaigns).

When invited to share any other comment, three main themes were recorded:

·      The significant financial constraints in the rural sector, particularly in relation to the high costs associated with fencing.

·      The crucial support provided by KMR, and KMR’s role as a nationwide model.

·      Appreciation for the technical and practical assistance from KMR in navigating administrative processes and providing advice.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

 

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.4

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Quarterly and End of Financial Year People and Culture Report

From:

Kayla Ludlow, Human Resources Advisor; Beryl Steele, Human Resources Manager and Jessica Matson, Human Resources Advisor

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 16 July 2024

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

This report is to inform the council of high-level activity within People and Culture for the months of April, May and June 2024 and the running statistics for the 2023-2024 financial year. This report includes an overview of the following areas of the last financial year, staffing levels, recruitment, training, sick leave, departures and turnover.

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Quarterly and End of Financial Year People and Culture Report’ by Kayla Ludlow, Human Resources Advisor; Beryl Steele, Human Resources Manager and Jessica Matson, Human Resources Advisor and dated 9 July 2024, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

Overview

 

Summary of quarter – April, May and June 2024.

 

Please refer to the following page for the year-to-date data.

 

The staff headcount and full-time equivalent has increased since this time last year. This will be due to high numbers of recruitment from the annual and long-term plans. However, there has been a reduction in full-time equivalents since January 2024, this will be due to the summer internships and scholarship internships ending.

 

There has been a reduction in turnover with June 2024 sitting at 10.83% and June 2023 sitting at 12.97%.

 

We have seen an increase in annual leave entitlement this quarter, this may be in part be due to the increased sick leave that was taken during this time. Other contributing factors could also include an increase in staff numbers as well as the flexi plus trial.

 

Sick leave taken is higher in June 2024 than it was in April and May. We saw a large increase of COVID-19 numbers in June with many staff off sick with winter bugs. This quarter has followed a similar trend to this time last year. We also have had several staff off with injuries, which then result in further time off for recovery.

 

 

 

 

 


A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Looking Back 2023 - 2024

 

Current Staff Count.

 

Staff numbers have increased from the start of the financial year. There is an increase over the summer months as we had several Summer Interns and Scholarship Interns come onboard for a fixed term period.

 

Overall staff numbers have increased from 296 in July 2023 to 329 staff as at June 2024. This reflects the high number of vacancies we had from July 2023 to October 2023.

 

Our permanent staff headcount increased from 263 in July 2023 to 285 in June 2024.

 

 

 

A graph of green and white bars

Description automatically generated

 

 

 

Recruitment and Retention Quarter April 2024 – June 2024

 

Recruitment Summary | April 2024

Vacancies filled this month. (Appointments made, however, yet to commence)

New vacancies listed this month

Roles currently in recruitment phase

3 Appointments

0 Internal

3 External

2 Advertised (new)

1 Readvertised

9 Roles Vacant

 

Recruitment Summary | May 2024

Vacancies filled this month. (Appointments made, however, yet to commence)

New vacancies listed this month

Roles currently in recruitment phase

9 Appointments

0 Internal

9 External

5 Advertised (new)

0 Readvertised

6 Roles Vacant

 

Recruitment Summary | June 2024

Vacancies filled this month. (Appointments made, however, yet to commence)

New vacancies listed this month

Roles currently in recruitment phase

5 Appointments

3 Internal

2 External

5 Advertised (new)

0 Readvertised

7 Roles Vacant

 

This quarter recruitment has been slightly quieter than previous quarters, however in addition to the numbers above we have also been working on the 6 Tū ī te ora scholarship roles which is a big process.

 

In June we went live with our new recruitment system ELMO, the Recruitment Advisor and team have been working very hard to implement this system and get it live before the end of the financial year. The system is far more user friendly for both applicants and recruiters, it will also reduce the amount of double handling of information and help improve and simplify the process.

 

Planning has started for the 2024 – 2025 Summer Internships, we will likely start to advertise these positions in July. We will also see an increase in vacancies as the team and managers work on the Long Term Plan positions that were adopted at the end of June.  This year there is a delayed funding for new positions to allow time for the recruitment process to take place.

 

Recruitment and Retention 2023 – 2024

 

Total Vacancies Listed

Total Vacancies Filled

81

88

 

The difference between the total vacancies listed and the total vacancies filled, as noted above, will be due to a role over from the previous year and internal appointments.

 

There has been a decrease in total vacancies listed, there were 90 vacancies listed in 2022-2023.

 

The total number of vacancies listed will have also decreased due to our decrease in turnover. The statistics also show that the positions have been easier to fill this year.

 

The below graph shows a peak in vacancies filled following the vacancies listed.

 

Internal Movement

 

Staff Promoted

Movement Only

Total Internal Movements 2023-2024

9 staff

12 staff

21 staff

 

A graph with numbers and a number of people

Description automatically generated

 

We had a total of 21 Northland Regional Council staff members move internally into new roles over the past 12 months. Within this there were 9 promotions and 12 internal transfers (movement only).

 

In 2022 – 2023 a total of 34 staff members moved to new roles internally. This was made up of 14 staff promotions and 20 staff transfers.

 

For the past two years we have found internal recruitment was becoming common practice in the NRC recruitment culture as we faced difficulties finding suitable talent externally. As part of our retention plan, where we know we potentially have suitable internal staff we initially advertise internally.  If we do not have any suitable applicants, we then go to the market.

 

While offering internal staff opportunities to develop and move internally is positive for organisational culture and staff retention, it is important to note that the number of internal movements has had flow on impacts. Hiring internal staff results in consistent vacancies within the organisation, and potentially lost opportunities to bring new talent into NRC’s workforce. 

 

For the financial year 2023 – 2024 we saw a decrease in our internal promotions and movements, this could be due to the decreased number of vacancies throughout the middle of the financial year. With the Long Term Plan positions coming through we will likely see a spike in internal movement for next quarter.

 

Training 2023 - 2024

 

Please note the below figures are based on centralised training and do not include any Health and Safety training which will be reported in the Health and Safety report.

 

Average staff trained per month

Average monthly cost per person

Total Training Costs 2023-2024

28 staff

$51.09

$18,898

 

The amount of training has decreased this year as has the average monthly cost per person which has resulted in lower training costs for the financial year. In 2022-2023 we saw an average of 79 staff trained per month with an average monthly cost of $104.00 per person.

 

A graph of a graph showing the number of employees attending training

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

 

Sick Leave Taken 2023 -2024

 

Average Monthly Cost 2023-2024

Total Sick Leave Cost 2023-2024

Total Days Taken 2023-2024

$51,029

$595,122.83 p.a

1687.35 days

 

Comparison 2022-2023 Sick Leave Taken

 

Average Monthly Cost 2022-2023

Total Sick Leave Cost 2022-2023

Total Days Taken 2022-2023

$41,449

$497,389 p.a

1576.1 days

 

The increase in sick leave is likely to be attributed to a number of factors such as an increase in staff numbers and the encouragement to remain at home when unwell following new expectations after the COVID pandemic.

 

The increase in average and total costs will be due to the increase in sick leave, the increase in staff numbers and the increase in remuneration following salary reviews.

 

On average 146.70 paid sick days were taken each month amongst all staff. This is an increase from the last financial year where the average was 131.34 paid sick days.

 

A graph of green bars

Description automatically generated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Departures 2023 – 2024

 

A pie chart with numbers and text

Description automatically generated

 

Note: Career change is moving into a different role than what the person had at NRC. Better career opportunities are where the individual has moved for an advancement or growth that we could not provide at NRC at this point in time.

 

One permanent employee departed in the month of April 2024, four permanent employees departed in the month of May 2024 and three permanent employees departed in the month of June 2024. This totals eight permanent employee departures in this quarter.

Last quarter we had nine staff depart from NRC.

For the financial year 2023 - 2024 29 permanent employees left the council for several reasons with the largest percentage (31%) leaving for better career opportunities. This is a reduction from 35% in 2023 and 45% in 2022. The graph does show an increase in staff leaving due to relocation.

 

We have also seen a decrease in the number of staff leaving due to family reasons and both stress and retirement decreased by 1%.

 

 

A graph showing a blue line

Description automatically generated

 

 

 

A graph with numbers and a line

Description automatically generated

We have seen a decrease in our turnover rate this year compared to last year.

 

Salary Reviews

All salary reviews have been completed.

 

Flexi Plus

A large focus for Organisational Development has been the Flexi Plus trial. We're halfway through the trial and feedback from staff is positive with strong scores over a range of questions conducted as pulse surveys in March and June.

A graph of a graph of a graph

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

A graph of a graph showing a number of blue and green bars

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

 

Feedback from staff consistently highlights the positive impact this trial has had on general wellbeing, improving efficiency, and improved attraction and retention.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB)

A new DEIB policy was approved in April 2024. After it was released, a survey was created to develop a baseline. This survey will be re-run periodically to gauge progress and continue to identify and areas of concern. An overview of results can be seen in the following to diagrams.

 

A graph with different colored bars

Description automatically generated

 

A graph with different colored bars

Description automatically generated

A DEIB strategy has now been created and confirmed. This policy and strategy will guide a range of targeted initiatives and goals over the coming three years to ensure that all employees work in a collaborative and productive environment where diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging are encouraged, respected and embraced in day-to-day operations.

 

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

 

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 7.5

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Legislative Compliance half yearly report January-June 2024

From:

Samuel van Hout, Corporate Policy Analyst

Authorised by Group Manager/s:

Bruce Howse, Pou Taumatua – Group Manager Corporate Services, on 15 July 2024

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive summary

This report presents the findings of council’s legislative compliance programme for the six-month period 1 January – 30 June 2024

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Legislative Compliance half yearly report January-June 2024’ by Samuel van Hout, Corporate Policy Analyst and dated 5 July 2024, be received.

 

Background/Tuhinga

The Office of the Auditor-General encourages local authorities to apply a systematic process to managing the legal risks that might arise in relation to the functions and activities that they are responsible for. 

Council’s current legislative compliance framework provides assurance for compliance with legislation that is fundamental to the council’s operations and/or poses significant potential risk (core legislation).  Core legislation includes:

·    Council's own rules, policies and bylaws

·    The Local Government Act 2002

·    The Local Government (Financial Reporting and Prudence) Regulations 2014

·    The Non-Financial Performance Measures Rules 2013

·    The local Government Borrowing Act 2011

·    The Local Government (Rating) Act 2002

·    The Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

·    Local Government (Pecuniary Interests Register) Amendment Act 2022

·    The Local Authorities (Member’s Interests) Act 1968

·    The Resource Management Act 1991

·    The Health and Safety at Work Act 2015

·    The Holidays Act 2003

·    The Employment Relations Act 2000

·    The Biosecurity Act 1993

·    The Building Act 2004

·    The Civil Defence and Emergency Management Act 2002

·    The Land Transport Act 1998

·    The Maritime Transport Act 1994

·    The Fire and Emergency New Zealand Act 2017

·    The Privacy Act 2020

·    The Public Records Act 2005

·    The Goods and Services Tax Act 1985

·    The Residential Tenancies Act 1956

·    The following settlement acts:

Ngāti Kuri Claims Settlement Act 2015;

Te Aupōuri Claims Settlement Act 2015;

NgāiTakoto Claims Settlement Act 2015;

Te Rarawa Claims Settlement Act 2015;

Ngāti Kahu Accumulated Rentals Trust Act 2015;

Te Hiku Omnibus Settlement Acts.

There are several other pieces of legislation that also have relevance to council operations, but compliance is managed via other internal processes and procedures and not reported here.

Legislative compliance reporting is completed six-monthly by group managers.  Reporting requires group managers to confirm compliance (or otherwise) with the relevant legislation and identify action that has been carried out to ensure that council is aware of any new legislation or regulations. Group managers must sign a declaration confirming their level of compliance. 

Group managers stay informed of legislative amendments via ComplyWith, ListServs, national steering groups, parliamentary alerts, legal advice, advisors, and audit processes.

Reporting has been completed for the six-month period 1 January – 30 June 2024, and the results are reported here by exception.

Reporting indicated that compliance was achieved with all of council’s core legislation, with exception to the following:

·    Partial compliance was achieved with the Public Records Act 2005 due to the information asset register not having been completed during the reporting period. Progress on the development of the asset register has included certified storage of relevant files, external review of IM maturity, the establishment of a Protective Security Group, scoping a retention and disposal project, and promotion of council acceptable use policy.

·    Partial compliance was achieved with the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 due to three breaches of the 20-day timeframe. This has been reported to council in the Chief Executive Report.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Nil

 

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 8.1

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Receipt of Committee Minutes

From:

Meloney Tupou, Maori Governance and Engagement Support Admin

Authorised by:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on 17 July 2024

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the unconfirmed minutes of the:

·        Te Oneroa-A-Tōhe Board – 24 May 2024

·        Audit Risk and Finance Committee – 29 May 2024

·        Extraordinary Regional Transport Committee – 4 July 2024

be received.

 

Attachments/Ngā tapirihanga

Attachment 1: Te Oneroa-A-Tōhe Board minutes - 24 May 2024

Attachment 2: Audit Risk and Finance Committee minutes - 29 May 2024

Attachment 3: Extraordinary Regional Transport Committee minutes - 4 July 2024  

 

 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.1

23 July 2024Attachment 1







 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.1

23 July 2024Attachment 2







 


Council Meeting  ITEM: 8.1

23 July 2024Attachment 3




 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                  item: 8.2

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Working Party Updates

From:

Meloney Tupou, Maori Governance and Engagement Support Admin

Authorised by:

Chris Taylor, Governance Specialist, on date 17 July 2024

 

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendation

That the report ‘Working Party Updates’ be received.

 

Whangarei Public Transport Working Party (Chair Cr Craw)

The Whangarei Public Transport Working Party (WPTWP) met on 11 June 2024. The topics for discussion included:

·        Operational Report

·        Frequency of future meetings

Following discussion, the Whangarei Public Transport Working Party provided advice on the following next steps:

·        Citylink driver situation response email to be circulated to WPTWP members following the June meeting

·        Group Manager Community Resilience to provide an email to the Chair within one week to provide T2 lanes update

·        Transport Manager NTA to obtain timeline from National meeting on MOT/NZTA review of Total Mobility eligibility criteria

·        New meeting dates to be agreed with the Chair

 

Awanui River Working Group (Chair Cr Carr)

The Awanui River Working Group met on 27 June 2024. The topics for discussion included:

·        Shovel Ready – Project Update

·        Year End Budget 2022 – 2023

·        Works Programme

·        Kaitaia Treatment Plant Resource Consent Renewal

·        Paparore Banks

·        Management of Tāngogne Wetland storage area and Waihoe Floodgates

Following discussion, the Awanui River Working Group provided advice on the following next steps:

·        Rivers Manager to gather hydrological data and to investigate ways to improve the management of the Tāngonge Wetland Storage Area and Waihoe outfall.

·        Area Manager Kaitāia to clarify if these assets are Awanui River Flood Scheme assets or the FNDC Drainage District assets

·        Rivers Manager to contact Tanya Proctor (FNDC) regarding Kaitāia Treatment Plant Resource Consent Renewal resolution

 

Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (Co-Chairs: Cr Tui Shortland and Pita Tipene, Ngāti Hine)

The Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) met on 9 May 2024. The key topics for discussion included:

·        Freshwater monitoring framework

·        Partnership roadmap to transfer of powers

·        Amendment to Local Government Electoral Legislation (Māori Wards and Constituencies)

Following discussion, the Te Taitokerau Māori and Council Working Party (TTMAC) provided advice on the following next steps:

·    That a work programme be developed that strengthens our commitment by council to develop and fund culturally appropriate environmental monitoring programmes for tangata whenua to undertake their own monitoring and bring this programme to the next available TTMAC meeting for consideration.

·    That a ‘roadmap’ for progressing towards formal delegations and transfers of functions and powers be developed and that staff present an action plan for reporting on milestones, outcomes and case studies associated with giving effect to the roadmap at the next available TTMAC meeting.

·    That TTMAC iwi and hapū representatives provide advice on how they would like to be informed, supported and contribute to key points council could consider in developing its submission on the changes proposed to the Local Electoral Act 2001 and the associated challenges for iwi and hapū in Te Taitokerau.

 

 

   

 


Council Meeting                                                                                                                                                                              ITEM: 9.0

23 July 2024

 

TITLE:

Business with the Public Excluded

 

Whakarāpopototanga / Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider the confidential matters detailed below for the reasons given.

Ngā mahi tūtohutia / Recommendations

1.            That the public be excluded from the proceedings of this meeting to consider confidential matters.

 

2.            That the general subject of the matters to be considered whilst the public is excluded, the reasons for passing this resolution in relation to this matter, and the specific grounds under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution, are as follows:

Item No.

Item Issue

Reasons/Grounds

9.1

Confirmation of Confidential Minutes - 25 June 2024

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting -.

9.2

Receipt of Confidential Committee Minutes

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, as stated in the open section of the meeting -.

9.3

Strategic Projects Update

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities s7(2)(h) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i).

9.4

Leaseholder's Notice of Exit Stage Two

The public conduct of the proceedings would be likely to result in disclosure of information, the withholding of which is necessary to protect information where the making available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information s7(2)(b)(ii) and the withholding of which is necessary to enable council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) s7(2)(i).

3.            That the Independent Advisors be permitted to stay during business with the public excluded.

Considerations

1.    Significance and Engagement

This is a procedural matter required by law. Hence when assessed against council policy is deemed to be of low significance.

2.    Policy and Legislative Compliance

The report complies with the provisions to exclude the public from the whole or any part of the proceedings of any meeting as detailed in sections 47 and 48 of the Local Government Official Information Act 1987.

3.    Other Considerations

Being a purely administrative matter; Climate Impact, Environmental Impact, Community Views, Māori Impact Statement, Financial Implications, and Implementation Issues are not applicable.

 



[1] Please note there was an error in the report to the June council meeting with the ‘Financial implications’ not taking into account the remuneration changes as a result of the change in the Chair of the Biosecurity and Biodiversity Working Party.